Pain symptoms and stooling patterns do not drive diagnostic costs for children with functional abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome in primary or tertiary care.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the cost of medical evaluation for children with functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome brought to a pediatric gastroenterologist versus children who remained in the care of their pediatrician, (2) compare symptom characteristics for the children in primary versus tertiary care, and (3) examine if symptom characteristics predicted the cost of medical evaluation. METHODS: Eighty-nine children aged 7 to 10 years with functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome seen by a gastroenterologist (n = 46) or seen only by a pediatrician (n = 43) completed daily pain and stool diaries for 2 weeks. Mothers provided retrospective reports of their children's symptoms in the previous year. Cost of medical evaluation was calculated via chart review of diagnostic tests and application of prices as if the patients were self-pay. RESULTS: Child-reported diary data reflected no significant group differences with respect to pain, interference with activities, or stool characteristics. In contrast, mothers of children evaluated by a gastroenterologist viewed their children as having higher maximum pain intensity in the previous year. Excluding endoscopy costs, cost of medical evaluation was fivefold higher for children evaluated by a gastroenterologist, with higher cost across blood work, stool studies, breath testing, and diagnostic imaging. Symptom characteristics did not predict cost of care for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of difference in symptom characteristics between children in primary and tertiary care, a notable differential in cost of evaluation exists in accordance with level of care. Symptom characteristics do not seem to drive diagnostic evaluation in either primary or tertiary care. Given the lack of differences in child-reported symptoms and the maternal perspective that children evaluated by a gastroenterologist had more severe pain, we speculate that parent perception of child symptoms may be a primary factor in seeking tertiary care.

Review article: epidemiology and quality of life in functional gastrointestinal disorders.

The epidemiology and health-related quality of life associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders are reviewed, with particular emphasis on irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. The literature supports the significant world-wide prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia and chronic constipation. An increased female prevalence has been demonstrated in most studies in patients with IBS and chronic constipation, but not functional dyspepsia. The female to male ratio appears to be greater in the health care-seeking population than in community populations. However, some differences in the reported general prevalence and gender-related prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders may be due to cultural factors and study methodology. A significant health care burden is associated with IBS, with increased out-patient services, abdominal and pelvic surgeries, and gastrointestinal- and non-gastrointestinal-related physician visits and health care costs. Health-related quality of life is impacted significantly in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia and IBS, compared with the general healthy population, as well as patients with other chronic medical conditions, such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and asthma. Impaired health-related quality of life has been demonstrated, in particular, in patients with moderate to severe disease seen in referral settings. The health-related quality of life appears to improve in treatment responders, or correlates with symptom improvement, with at least some treatment modalities studied in functional gastrointestinal disorders, but further studies are needed. Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders include psychosocial factors, such as early adverse life events, and symptoms related to visceral perception, e.g. pain and chronic stress. The presence of extra-intestinal symptoms appears to have a major if not greater impact on health care visits, excess health care costs and health-related quality of life in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Serological testing for coeliac disease in patients with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome may have coeliac disease. AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of coeliac disease testing in suspected irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: We used decision analysis to estimate the number of coeliac disease cases detected, quality-adjusted life-years gained, and costs resulting from testing suspected irritable bowel syndrome patients for tissue transglutaminase antibody or an antibody panel (tissue transglutaminase, gliadin, total immunoglobulin A). Positive tests prompted endoscopic biopsy. A gluten-free diet improved quality of life in coeliac disease. RESULTS: Assuming a coeliac disease prevalence of 3%, tissue transglutaminase detected 28 and the panel detected 29 of 30 coeliac disease cases among 1000 suspected irritable bowel syndrome patients. The cost/case detected was $4600 with tissue transglutaminase and $8800 with the panel. The cost/quality-adjusted life-year gained with tissue transglutaminase was $7400, and the incremental cost/quality-adjusted life-year gained for the panel vs. tissue transglutaminase was $287 000. Tissue transglutaminase cost under $100 000/quality-adjusted life-year gained at a coeliac disease prevalence >/=1.1%, assuming a modest utility gain of 0.005 with coeliac disease diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for coeliac disease in patients with suspected irritable bowel syndrome is likely to be cost-effective even at a relatively low coeliac disease prevalence and with small improvements in quality of life with a gluten-free diet.

The economic consequences of irritable bowel syndrome: a US employer perspective.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to measure the direct costs of treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and the indirect costs in the workplace. This was accomplished through retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from a national Fortune 100 manufacturer, which includes all medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims for the company's employees, spouses/dependents, and retirees. METHODS: Patients with IBS were identified as individuals, aged 18 to 64 years, who received a primary code for IBS or a secondary code for IBS and a primary code for constipation or abdominal pain between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1998. Of these patients with IBS, 93.7% were matched based on age, sex, employment status, and ZIP code to a control population of beneficiaries. Direct and indirect costs for patients with IBS were compared with those of matched controls. RESULTS: The average total cost (direct plus indirect) per patient with IBS was 4527 dollars in 1998 compared with 3276 dollars for a control beneficiary (P<.001). The average physician visit costs were 524 dollars and 345 dollars for patients with IBS and controls, respectively (P<.001). The average outpatient care costs to the employer were 1258 dollars and 742 dollars for patients with IBS and controls, respectively (P<.001). Medically related work absenteeism cost the employer 901 dollars on average per employee treated for IBS compared with 528 dollars on average per employee without IBS (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Irritable bowel syndrome is a significant financial burden on the employer that arises from an increase in direct and indirect costs compared with the control group.

[Irritable bowel syndrome and healthcare consumption. An observational study in private gastroenterology]. / Troubles fonctionnels intestinaux et consommation de soins. Etude observationnelle en gastro-entérologie libérale.

AIM: Little data is available on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to study the relationship between the severity of IBS and healthcare consumption. METHODS: During a cross-sectional epidemiological study undertaken by 330 private gastro-enterologists, the severity of IBS symptoms experienced by patients was quantified with Francis' score (limits 0-500) to study the relationship with the healthcare consumption. RESULTS: Data obtained from 1407 patients (mean age: 52.3 +/- 15 years, females: 68%) were analysed. Symptoms were usually long-lasting (mean duration: 134.1 +/- 128.4 months); they had required on average 5.7 +/- 4.5 medical visits in the past year including 2.3 +/- 2.1 visits to a gastroenterologist. The mean number of additional investigations performed by patient was 1.3 +/- 1.4. Ninety one percent of them took at least one medication. The mean severity score was 268.5 +/- 85.2. Patients' distribution according to severity showed that 47.3% of the patients had symptoms of moderate severity and 44.9% of high severity. There was a significant relationship between, in one hand, severity of symptoms and, in the other hand, the number of visits (P<0.001), the number of additional investigations (P<0.001) and the number of prescribed medications (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a positive relationship between the severity of symptoms and the healthcare consumption in private gastroenterological practice. The data confirm the significant burden of IBS in France.

Safety, efficacy and costs of pharmacotherapy for functional gastrointestinal disorders: the case of alosetron and its implications.

BACKGROUND: Functional gastrointestinal disorders cause substantial morbidity, but not mortality. Alosetron may achieve 'adequate relief ' in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, but may cause major complications, including death. AIM: To appraise, quantitatively, the trade-off between possible symptomatic improvement and serious complications in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders. METHODS: A decision analytical model was used to examine alosetron or standard treatment for 6 months in 45-year-old women with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome using the health care system's perspective. RESULTS: Assuming a 14% higher 'adequate relief' rate with alosetron compared to standard care, and a complication rate of four per 1000 persons in 6 months, alosetron gained 0.00081 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient at a cost of 358,700 US dollars per QALY gained. Alosetron gained QALYs if 'adequate relief' increased the patients' utility by more than 0.01 in the base case. In probabilistic analysis, alosetron gained QALYs in 98.2% of iterations at a median cost of 212,600 US dollars per QALY (interquartile range, 138,000-338,900 US dollars per QALY). Results were highly sensitive to the utility gain with 'adequate relief' and alosetron's response and complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Alosetron's benefit-to-risk profile appears to be favourable, but its cost per QALY gained may be substantial. Decision analyses on treatments for functional gastrointestinal disorders are likely to be highly sensitive to the utility estimates used. There is a pressing need for direct utility measurements in functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Irritable bowel syndrome, health care use, and costs: a U.S. managed care perspective.

OBJECTIVE: We performed an evaluation of patient symptoms, health care use, and costs to define the burden of illness of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and the relation to the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort in a large health maintenance organization. METHODS: All 6500 adult health maintenance organization members who had undergone flexible sigmoidoscopy in the year 2000 were mailed a questionnaire that elicited Rome I symptom criteria and severity ratings for abdominal pain/discomfort. Multiple health care use measures were obtained from various administrative databases. IBS patients were compared with a control group of non-IBS subjects, and analyses were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: We received 2613 (40.2%) responses. Compared with non-IBS subjects over 2 yr, IBS patients had more outpatient visits (medical, surgery, and emergency, p < 0.05), were hospitalized more often (p < 0.05), and had more total outpatient prescriptions (p < 0.05) and IBS-related prescriptions (p < 0.05). Over 1 yr, total costs were 51% higher in IBS patients, who also had higher costs for outpatient visits, drugs, and radiology and laboratory tests (p < 0.05). Total costs were increased by 35%, 52%, and 59% in IBS patients with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms of abdominal pain/discomfort compared with non-IBS subjects (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using Rome I symptom criteria, we found that IBS is associated with a broad pattern of increased health care use and costs. The severity of abdominal pain/discomfort is a significant predictor of health care use and costs for patients with IBS compared with non-IBS subjects.

Irritable bowel syndrome in Germany. A cost of illness study.

OBJECTIVES: When asked, between 10% and 15% of people in the Western world report symptoms compatible with irritable bowel syndrome, and around 5% seek medical advice for these complaints. This should incur considerable costs. The present study was designed to give a cost estimate for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome paid for by German statutory health insurance. METHODS: Fifty doctors working in private practice were randomly selected to each carry out personal interviews on four irritable bowel syndrome patients chosen from their own records (total 200 patients). Using a structured questionnaire, information regarding diagnostic procedures, drugs and other therapies, hospitalization and days off work were obtained from the case records. To calculate the total direct costs of the illness, all single cost elements such as physician services, medication and hospitalization were included. RESULTS: The number of office visits was nine per patient per year; nearly one-third of employed patients missed work for irritable bowel syndrome, and one out of 15 patients was hospitalized for this condition. Several technical procedures were ordered, mostly laboratory tests. Nearly all patients had at least one drug prescription for irritable bowel syndrome during the year of the survey, with a mean of 3.5 prescriptions per patient. The largest pharmacological groups were antispasmodics (29.2%) and prokinetics (8.9%). Total direct costs for one irritable bowel syndrome patient per year amounted to 1548 DEM (791.48 [OV0556]), comprising roughly 25% for physician visits and tests, 50% for drugs and 25% for hospitalization. Including indirect costs for sick leave, total costs were 1946 DEM (994.97 [OV0556]) per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: The costs incurred by irritable bowel syndrome are considerable.

Burden of illness in irritable bowel syndrome comparing Rome I and Rome II criteria.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the burden of illness in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in terms of resource utilisation (direct and indirect) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), in individuals with IBS who meet Rome I and Rome II criteria. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, carried out by personal interview, on a representative sample (n = 2000) of the Spanish population. Individuals with suspected IBS were identified via a screening question and subsequently given an epidemiological questionnaire to complete. The questionnaire collected information on IBS symptoms, resource utilisation, and HR-QOL [Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36)]. RESULTS: Sixty-five individuals met Rome II criteria for IBS, while 146 individuals met exclusively Rome I criteria. Of Rome II individuals, 67.7% had consulted some type of healthcare professional in the previous 12 months, compared with only 41.8% of those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria (p vs 17.1%); 'drug consumption' (70.8 vs 45.2%); and 'reduced performance in main activity' (60 vs 27.4%). Compared with the general population, the study sample reported significantly worse HR-QOL scores in four dimensions of the SF-36 ('bodily pain', 'vitality', 'social functioning' and 'role-emotional'. Additionally, individuals meeting Rome II criteria reported worse HR-QOL scores than those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria, especially in the 'bodily pain' and 'general health' dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness in IBS is important and correlated to the diagnostic criteria employed. Individuals who met Rome II criteria reported a higher level of resource utilisation and worse HR-QOL than individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria.

Health-related quality of life and cost impact of irritable bowel syndrome in a UK primary care setting.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), time off work and the utilisation and cost of health services. DESIGN: A case-control study was undertaken matching patients with IBS and controls. Quality-of-life information was collected using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) health survey, EuroQOL instrument (EQ-5D) and IBS Quality-of-Life (IBS-QOL) instruments. Data on time off work was also collected. National Health Service (NHS) resource use in primary and secondary care was estimated by review of general practitioner (GP) and hospital records over a 12-month period. SETTING: Recruitment was from six GPs' surgeries in the Trent Region of the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 161 patients with IBS, as defined by the Rome Criteria I were recruited. These were compared with 213 controls matched for age, sex and social characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SF-36 and EQ-5D scores; mean number of days off work; mean NHS costs per person during the 12-month study period. RESULTS: Patients with IBS had considerably lower HR-QOL than controls. They scored worse in all dimensions of the SF-36 and the EQ-5D and they had more time off work. On average patients with IBS cost the NHS 123 UK pounds (95% confidence interval: 35 UK pounds to 221 UK pounds, 1999 values) more per year than individuals in the control group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IBS affects patients through reduced quality of life, more time off work and greater healthcare utilisation than a control group of patients without IBS. The difference in quality of life was pronounced and unusual in that it was influential in every dimension of both the SF-36 and the EQ-5D.

The economic impact of irritable bowel syndrome in a managed care setting.

GOALS: To compare the healthcare resource consumption of patients who have irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with an age-, gender-, and comorbidity-matched cohort of patients without IBS from a managed care perspective. STUDY: Retrospective cohort analysis. Data were obtained electronically through the Henry Ford Health System corporate data warehouse. Patients with IBS were eligible if they had at least one primary diagnosis of irritable colon (ICD-9-CM 564.1). The control cohort was identified from an age, gender, and comorbidity population-matched (5:1) sample. The index date for the IBS and control cohorts was defined as the first initial diagnosis and first clinical encounter in 1998, respectively. The charges per patient by resource use type were collected for the 12 months before and after the index date. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients with IBS and 2505 controls fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria (70% female, 58% between 40 and 65 years). The IBS cohort, before the IBS diagnosis, had significantly higher total charges (p < 0.001), drug charges (p < 0.001), and outpatient charges (p < 0.001) than the control cohort. During the postindex (postdiagnosis period), the patients with IBS had higher total charges (p < 0.006), outpatient charges (p < 0.022), and drug charges (p < 0.001) than the control population. The control cohort had higher procedure charges (p < 0.001) during both periods. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an IBS diagnosis represent a substantial cost to managed care before and after the diagnosis of IBS. Costs associated with these patients result mainly from non-IBS conditions. Further research is warranted to identify these patients earlier, and to prevent the economic burden associated with them.

[How extensively should irritable bowel syndrome be investigated? Expensive bowel sounds in the abdomen]. / Wie gründlich muss das Reizdarmsyndrom abgeklärt werden? Teures Rumoren im Bauch.

Its high prevalence, chronic course, sometimes very troubling symptoms and rather limited therapeutic options, make the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) one of the most common conditions seen by the family doctor, internist and gastroenterologist. IBS is characterized by abdominal pain accompanied by altered bowel movements and a facultative association with abdominal distension. IBS runs a chronic recurrent course punctuated by relatively symptom-free phases, and an overall good prognosis for survival (quoad vitam). Visceral hypersensitivity, altered gastrointestinal motility, psychosocial factors, and neurotransmitter imbalance are under discussion as underlying pathophysiology. An orienting medical history, clinical examination and exclusion of such alarm symptoms as weight loss, general debility and rectal bleeding, must be followed by a rational choice of further diagnostic measures.

Socioeconomic impact of irritable bowel syndrome in Canada.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gastroenterological disorder reported to physicians. In Canada, its prevalence is about 6%. In the United States and the United Kingdom, the prevalence is estimated to be closer to 15%. Patients with IBS tend to make extensive use of health care services, even though a high percentage of them do not seek medical advice. The costs of IBS are a large expenditure of scarce resources. These costs can be divided into several categories: direct, indirect and intangible costs. The direct costs, associated with the diagnosis and treatment, are largely sustained by the health care system. The indirect costs are related to the production losses due to morbidity, and intangible costs are associated with the pain, suffering and alteration in the patient's quality of life. The condition is a diagnosis of exclusion, and treatment, although beneficial, is rarely curative. The general treatment approach stresses the importance of a good physician-patient relationship. Exploring the nature of the expenses associated with IBS and understanding how treatment options may affect these costs are essential to reducing its financial burden.

Costs of care for irritable bowel syndrome patients in a health maintenance organization.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the total costs of care and costs related to lower GI-related problems for patients who received a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 2) to compare them to age- and sex-matched population controls and patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Use and cost data were obtained through the computerized information systems of a large staff-model health maintenance organization on three groups of patients diagnosed in 1994 or 1995 with IBS, IBD, or GERD; and an age- and sex-matched control group of patients without any of these listed diagnoses. The IBS patient group was compared to the three comparison groups on components of total and IBS-related costs. RESULTS: Total costs of care for IBS patients were 49% higher than population controls during the year starting with the visit at which IBS patients were identified. In the index year, every component of total costs except inpatient care was significantly higher for IBS patients than for population controls. The costs of care for lower GI problems were significantly higher for patients with IBS than for population controls across a range of services. However, only 33% of the difference in total costs of care between IBS patients and population controls was due to lower GI-related services in the index year. In the subsequent years, lower GI-related services accounted for 18% and 20% of the total cost difference between IBS patients and population controls. The total costs of care as well as the components of costs of care were generally higher for IBD patients than for IBS patients, but were comparable for GERD and IBS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBS show sustained increases in health care costs relative to population controls for both lower GI services and care unrelated to lower GI problems. However, the majority of the excess in health care costs resulted from medical care not directly related to lower GI problems.

Quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome.

Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment is becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of the impact of disease and the effect of therapy. This is particularly so forirritable bowel syndrome (IBS) where there is often a tendency for a chronic clinical course, but with no associated mortality. Instruments used to study quality of life may be generic or disease specific, and care needs to be taken to ensure that the instrument used has been adequately validated for the purpose intended. Several disease-specific instruments [Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL, IBSQOL) and Functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL)], in addition to generic measures, are now available for use in IBS. Quality of life in patients with IBS is surprisingly poor, particularly in the population seeking healthcare, where it can be compared with conditions which carry a high mortality, such as ischaemic heart disease, heart failure and diabetes mellitus. Pain severity appears to be an important factor in determining quality of life in IBS, although bowel disturbance and psychological difficulties are also likely to be important. There is limited data on the effect of treatment of IBS on quality of life. Improvement has been reported with dietry modification, drug treatments and hypnotherapy. It is likely that, in the future, QOL measures will become increasingly used as secondary end-points in therapeutic trials in IBS.

Irritable bowel syndrome: toward a cost-effective management approach.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the economic implications of current irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management practices and formulate recommendations based on these implications. METHODS: Relevant English-language research publications in which the direct and indirect costs of IBS were examined, identified using a search of records contained in Medline. RESULTS: Review of the identified publications indicates that in Western nations, IBS management is associated with high direct costs (particularly for diagnostic testing, office visits, pharmacotherapy, and emergency department visits). Indirect costs, associated with lost wages and decreased productivity, account for the largest proportion of the IBS economic burden. Moreover, rapid projected growth in IBS disease-related costs indicates a need for more focused attention toward improved treatment of IBS. More cost-effective management might be achieved by diagnosing and instituting nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management earlier in the disease process. Under such an approach, patients are classified based on symptoms and a therapeutic trial is begun. More extensive, expensive diagnostic testing is reserved for patients refractory to treatment or for whom serious disease must be ruled out. CONCLUSION: IBS is a condition with high direct and indirect costs. Management strategies should be evaluated both on their clinical efficacy and on their cost effectiveness. As new, IBS-specific pharmacotherapies become available, the ability to diagnose and manage the condition in a cost-effective manner can be improved.

Health-related quality of life and health care costs in severe, refractory irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may lead to considerable impairment of health-related quality of life and high health care costs. It is not clear whether these poor outcomes directly result from severe bowel symptoms or reflect a coexisting psychiatric disorder. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bowel symptom severity and psychological symptoms directly influence health-related quality of life and health care costs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary gastroenterology clinics. PATIENTS: 257 patients with severe IBS who did not respond to usual treatments and were recruited for a trial of psychological treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Predictors were abdominal pain, entries in a diary of 10 IBS symptoms, and measures of psychological symptoms. Outcomes were inability to work, health-related quality of life (measured by Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short-form questionnaire [SF-36] physical component summary scores), and health care and productivity costs. Predictor and outcome measures were compared by using multiple regression and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Abdominal pain occurred on average 24 days per month and activities were restricted on 145 days of the previous 12 months. The mean (+/-SD) Hamilton depression score was 11.3 +/- 6.1. The SF-36 physical component summary score was low (37.7 +/- 10.6), and the patients had incurred high health care costs ($1743 +/- $2263) over the previous year. Global severity and somatization scores on the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, abdominal pain, and Hamilton depression scores independently contributed to the physical component score of the SF-36 (adjusted R(2) = 35.2%), but only psychological scores were associated with disability due to ill health. These variables did not accurately predict health care or other costs (adjusted R(2) = 9.3%). History of sexual abuse was not an independent predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both abdominal and psychological symptoms are independently associated with impaired health-related quality of life in patients with severe IBS. Optimal treatment is likely to require a holistic approach. Since health care and loss of productivity costs are not clearly associated with these symptoms, alleviation of them will not necessarily lead to reduced costs.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopy in irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown to what extent at what expense flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy add to the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of the study was to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of endoscopic procedures in the workup for IBS. METHODS: Using the Bayes formula, we calculated the increase in diagnostic certainty for a consecutive number of tests. We also calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which corresponds to the test costs divided by the increment in diagnostic certainty. RESULTS: The diagnosis of IBS can be established with a relatively high probability of more than 80% relying on relatively inexpensive and noninvasive tests only. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy constitute the most costly portion of any workup for IBS, which amounts to 50% to 75% of the overall costs. Because of their high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, endoscopic procedures should not be used at the beginning of the diagnostic workup. This outcome of the analysis remains largely unaffected within reasonable ranges of the sensitivity and specificity of various tests. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of IBS, inexpensive, noninvasive tests should be used first to rule out other diagnoses. Despite their high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are indicated when a serious organic disease is reasonably likely and needs to be ruled out.

Economic burden of irritable bowel syndrome. Proposed strategies to control expenditures.

It has been suggested that the annual direct costs for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are now around $US41 billion in the 8 most industrialised countries. This paper reviews the data on calculations of direct costs. The true economic burden is unclear, as there are insufficient data on indirect costs other than absenteeism from work and intangible costs cannot be estimated, particularly since presenters with IBS constitute only a subset of the patients with such symptoms in the community. Strategies to reduce direct costs must include physician and patient education, paramedical-based education and therapy, lay support groups, early consideration of psychosocial issues and psychological treatments, avoidance of unnecessary investigations and optimising the doctor-patient relationship. Indirect and intangible costs could be effectively reduced by novel, effective (not only efficacious) therapies.