Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy is stable and feasible.

AIMS: This multicenter prospective cohort study (registration no. ChiCTR2000032089) aimed to investigate the relationship between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations to determine whether saliva could be used for routine monitoring of levetiracetam during pregnancy. METHODS: The slot concentrations of levetiracetam in simultaneously obtained saliva and plasma samples were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. The correlations between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations and the dose-normalized concentrations were compared among pregnant women in different stages and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy. RESULTS: In total, 231 patients with 407 plasma and saliva sample pairs were enrolled from 39 centers. Linear relationships between salivary and plasma levetiracetam concentrations were reported in the enrolled population (r = 0.898, p < 0.001), including pregnant (r = 0.935, p < 0.001) and nonpregnant participants (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations were moderately higher than saliva concentrations, with ratios of saliva to plasma concentrations of 0.98 for nonpregnant women, 0.98, 1, and 1.12 for pregnant women during the first trimester, the second trimester, the and third trimester, respectively. The effective range of saliva levetiracetam concentration was found to be 9.98 µg/mL (lower limit) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals, 0.915-0.959), sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 86.8%, and p < 0.001, to 24.05 µg/mL (upper limit) with an AUC of 0.952 (0.914-0.99), sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, and p = 0.007. CONCLUSION: The saliva/plasma concentration ratio of levetiracetam remains constant during pregnancy and is similar to that in non-pregnant individuals. Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy should be widely promoted.

Assessment of cerebral drug occupancy in humans using a single PET-scan: A [11C]UCB-J PET study.

PURPOSE: Here, we evaluate a PET displacement model with a Single-step and Numerical solution in healthy individuals using the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein (SV2A) PET-tracer [11C]UCB-J and the anti-seizure medication levetiracetam (LEV). We aimed to (1) validate the displacement model by comparing the brain LEV-SV2A occupancy from a single PET scan with the occupancy derived from two PET scans and the Lassen plot and (2) determine the plasma LEV concentration-SV2A occupancy curve in healthy individuals. METHODS: Eleven healthy individuals (five females, mean age 35.5 [range: 25-47] years) underwent two 120-min [11C]UCB-J PET scans where an LEV dose (5-30 mg/kg) was administered intravenously halfway through the first PET scan to partially displace radioligand binding to SV2A. Five individuals were scanned twice on the same day; the remaining six were scanned once on two separate days, receiving two identical LEV doses. Arterial blood samples were acquired to determine the arterial input function and plasma LEV concentrations. Using the displacement model, the SV2A-LEV target engagement was calculated and compared with the Lassen plot method. The resulting data were fitted with a single-site binding model. RESULTS: SV2A occupancies and VND estimates derived from the displacement model were not significantly different from the Lassen plot (p = 0.55 and 0.13, respectively). The coefficient of variation was 14.6% vs. 17.3% for the Numerical and the Single-step solution in Bland-Altman comparisons with the Lassen plot. The average half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), as estimated from the area under the curve of the plasma LEV concentration, was 12.5 µg/mL (95% CI: 5-25) for the Single-Step solution, 11.8 µg/mL (95% CI: 4-25) for the Numerical solution, and 6.3 µg/mL (95% CI: 0.08-21) for the Lassen plot. Constraining Emax to 100% did not significantly improve model fits. CONCLUSION: Plasma LEV concentration vs. SV2A occupancy can be determined in humans using a single PET scan displacement model. The average concentration of the three computed IC50 values ranges between 6.3 and 12.5 µg/mL. The next step is to use the displacement model to evaluate LEV occupancy and corresponding plasma concentrations in relation to treatment efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05450822. Retrospectively registered 5 July 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results? term=NCT05450822&Search=Search.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Different Trimesters of Pregnant Women with Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug in pregnant women due to its low teratogenic risk profile, favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, and safety profile. Serum levels of levetiracetam vary in epilepsy during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the serum levels of levetiracetam during different trimesters of pregnancy by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective study. Pregnant women with epilepsy on levetiracetam were enrolled after getting written informed consent from them. Serum trough levels of levetiracetam were estimated at all trimesters by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: The study included 16 participants with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 27.75 ± 4 years. There were nine (56.2%) participants with generalized seizure disorder and seven (43.8%) participants of focal seizure disorder. Among 16 patients, 10 (62.5%) participants were on levetiracetam alone and six (37.5%) participants were on levetiracetam combined with other antiepileptic drugs. In a total of 48 trough samples, 45 sample concentrations were below the therapeutic range of 12-46 mg/l and three sample concentrations were within the therapeutic range. There was a statistically significant difference in the concentration-dose ratio (CDR) of levetiracetam between the third and first trimesters (P-value 0.018). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in serum levetiracetam concentration between the third and first trimesters. A well-conducted, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling study in PWWE with a control group is needed in future to evaluate the whole pharmacokinetic profile of levetiracetam and to correlate the clinical outcome.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Characterize the Effects of Age and Obesity on the Disposition of Levetiracetam in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is an antiseizure medication used for several seizure types in adults and children aged 1 month and older; however, due to a lack of data, pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of levetiracetam is not adequately characterized in certain populations, particularly neonates, children younger than 2 years of age, and children older than 2 years of age with obesity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to address the gap by leveraging PK data from two prospective standard-of-care pediatric trials (n = 88) covering an age range from 1 month to 19 years, including those with obesity (64%), and applying a physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling framework. METHODS: A published PBPK model of levetiracetam for children aged 2 years and older was extended to pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age and patients older than 2 years of age with obesity by accounting for the obesity and age-related changes in PK using PK-Sim® software. The prospective pediatric data, along with the literature data for neonates and children younger than 2 years of age, were used to evaluate the extended PBPK models. RESULTS: Overall, 82.4% of data fell within the 90% interval of model-predicted concentrations, with an average fold error within twofold of the accepted criteria. PBPK modeling revealed that children with obesity had lower weight-normalized clearances (0.053 L/h/kg) on average than children without obesity (0.063 L/h/kg). The effect of maturation was well-characterized, resulting in comparable PBPK-simulated, weight-normalized clearances for neonates and children younger than 2 years of age reported from the literature. CONCLUSIONS: PBPK modeling simulations revealed that the current US FDA-labeled pediatric dosing regimen listed in the prescribing information can produce the required exposure of levetiracetam in these target populations with dose adjustments for children with obesity aged 4 years to younger than 16 years.

The impact of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of antiseizure medications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 674 pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence suggests that the physiological changes of pregnancy may impact pharmacokinetics of antiseizure medications (ASM), and this may affect treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to quantify the pregnancy impact on the ASM pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/EMBASE in November 2022 and updated in August 2023 for studies comparing levels of ASM in the same individuals during pregnancy and in the preconception/postpartum period. Alteration ratios between the 3rd trimester and baseline were estimated. We also performed a random-effects meta-analysis calculating between-timepoint differences in mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D ratios). Study quality was assessed using the ClinPK guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 65 studies investigating 15 ASMs in 674 pregnancies were included. The largest differences were reported for lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam (alteration ratio 0.42, range 0.07-2.45, 0.42, range 0.08-0.82 and 0.52, range 0.04-2.77 respectively): accordingly, C/D levels were lower in the 3rd trimester for lamotrigine, levetiracetam and the main oxcarbazepine metabolite monohydroxycarbazepine (MD = -12.33 × 10-3, 95%CI = -16.08 to -8.58 × 10-3 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), p < 0.001, MD = -7.16 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -9.96 to -4.36, p < 0.001, and MD = -4.87 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -9.39 to -0.35, p = 0.035, respectively), but not for oxcarbazepine (MD = 1.16 × 10-3 (µg/mL)/(mg/day), 95%CI = -2.55 to 0.24 × 10-3, p = 0.10). The quality of studies was acceptable with an average rating score of 11.5. CONCLUSIONS: Data for lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine (and monohydroxycarbazepine) and levetiracetam demonstrate major changes in pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, suggesting the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment outcomes.

A Simulation-Based Assessment of Levetiracetam Concentrations Following Fixed and Weight-Based Loading Doses: A Meta-Regression and Pharmacokinetic Modeling Analysis.

Current recommendations for refractory status epilepticus (SE) unresponsive to benzodiazepines suggest a loading dose of levetiracetam (LEV) of 60 mg/kg to a maximum of 4500 mg. LEV therapeutic drug monitoring can help guide therapy and is garnering increasing attention. The objective of this study is to simulate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of fixed dose and weight-based loading doses of LEV with respect to established therapeutic target concentrations. Meta-regression of the current literature was performed to evaluate the relationship between intravenous LEV loading dose and seizure cessation in refractory SE patients. A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate the PTA capacity of competing single intravenous dosing schemes (fixed vs weight-based dosing) to achieve maximum (Cpeak) and 12-h (C12h) plasma concentrations that exceed 12 mg/L. The meta-regression indicated that dosage was not a statistically significant modulator of seizure control at dosages between 20 and 60 mg/kg. Stochastic simulations showed all dosing schemes achieved plasma Cpeak >12 mg/L, but C12h levels were <12 mg/L in subjects over 60 kg with a fixed dose ≤2000 mg or in subjects <60 kg with a weight-based dose <30 mg/kg. Dosages of 40 and 60 mg/kg provided ≥90% PTAs across all weights. Using a weight-based loading dose of 40 mg/kg, up to a suggested maximum of 4500 mg, improves the likelihood of achieving a sustained therapeutic drug concentration after the initial LEV dose, whereas fixed <3000 mg may not achieve the desired concentration before maintenance dosing.

Brivaracetam exposure-response predictions in pediatric patients from age 1 month: Extrapolation of levetiracetam adult-pediatric scaling to brivaracetam.

BACKGROUND: An adult population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for the antiseizure medication (ASM) brivaracetam (BRV) was previously extended to children aged 4-16 years by using a pediatric BRV population PK model. Effects were scaled using information from a combined adult-pediatric PK/PD model of a related ASM, levetiracetam (LEV). OBJECTIVE: To scale an existing adult population PK/PD model for BRV to children aged 1 month to < 4 years using information from a combined adult-pediatric PK/PD model for LEV, and to predict the effective dose of BRV in children aged 1 month to < 4 years using the adult BRV PK/PD model modified for the basal seizure rate in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An existing adult population PK/PD model for BRV was scaled to children aged from 1 month to < 4 years using information from a combined adult-pediatric PK/PD model for LEV, an ASM binding to the same target protein as BRV. An existing adult-pediatric PK/PD model for LEV was extended using data from UCB study N01009 (NCT00175890) to include children as young as 1 month of age. The BRV population PK model was updated with data up to 180 days after first administration from BRV pediatric studies N01263 (NCT00422422) and N01266 (NCT01364597). PK and PD simulations for BRV were performed for a range of mg/kg doses to predict BRV effect in pediatric participants, and to provide dosing recommendations. RESULTS: The extended adult-pediatric LEV PK/PD model was able to describe the adult and pediatric data using the same PD model parameters in adults and children and supported the extension of the adult BRV PK/PD model to pediatric patients aged 1 month to < 4 years. Simulations predicted exposures similar to adults receiving BRV 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), when using 3 mg/kg b.i.d. for weight < 10 kg, 2.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for weight ≥ 10 kg and < 20 kg, and 2 mg/kg b.i.d. for weight ≥ 20 kg in children aged 1 month to < 4 years. PK/PD simulations show that maximum BRV response is expected to occur with 2-3 mg/kg b.i.d. dosing of BRV in children aged 1 month to < 4 years, with an effective dose of 1 mg/kg b.i.d. for some participants. CONCLUSION: Development of an adult-pediatric BRV PK/PD model allowed characterization of the exposure-response relationship of BRV in children aged 1 to < 4 years, providing a maximal dose allowance based on weight.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy: Levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication that is mainly excreted by the kidneys. Due to its low teratogenic risk, LEV is frequently prescribed for women with epilepsy (WWE). Physiological changes during gestation affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of LEV. The goal of our study was to characterize the changes in LEV clearance during pregnancy and the postpartum period, to better plan an LEV dosing paradigm for pregnant women. METHODS: This retrospective observational study incorporated a cohort of women who were followed up at the epilepsy in pregnancy clinic at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center during the years 2020-2023. Individualized target concentrations of LEV and an empirical postpartum taper were used for seizure control and to reduce toxicity likelihood. Patient visits took place every 1-2 months and included a review of medication dosage, trough LEV blood levels, week of gestation and LEV dose at the time of level measurement, and seizure diaries. Total LEV concentration/dose was calculated based on LEV levels and dose as an estimation of LEV clearance. RESULTS: A total of 263 samples were collected from 38 pregnant patients. We observed a decrease in LEV concentration/dose (C/D) as the pregnancy progressed, followed by an abrupt postpartum increase. Compared to the 3rd trimester, the most significant C/D decrease was observed at the 1st trimester (slope = .85), with no significant change in the 2nd trimester (slope = .11). A significant increase in C/D occurred postpartum (slope = 5.23). LEV dose was gradually increased by 75% during pregnancy compared to preconception. Average serum levels (µg/mL) decreased during pregnancy. During the postpartum period, serum levels increased, whereas the LEV dose was decreased by 24%, compared to the 3rd trimester. SIGNIFICANCE: LEV serum level monitoring is essential for WWE prior to and during pregnancy as well as postpartum. Our data contribute to determining a rational treatment and dosing paradigm for LEV use during both pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Effect of Nonadherence on Levetiracetam Pharmacokinetics and Remedial Dose Recommendations Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nonadherence to levetiracetam (LEV) use can result in subtherapeutic concentrations and increase the risk of the occurrence of seizures. The impact of missing LEV doses on its pharmacokinetics and evidence of the appropriate remedial dose is lacking. This study has determined the influence of missed LEV doses on its pharmacokinetics and has explored the appropriate remedial dosage regimens. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the impacts of different remedial dosage regimens on LEV concentrations. Simulated LEV concentrations outside the individual therapeutic range were calculated for the compliance scenario and for each of the remedial dosage regimens. The percentage of deviation from the full compliance scenario was also calculated. The regimen with the lowest percentage of deviation was considered the most appropriate. RESULTS: The suitable LEV remedial dose varied across the delay times. For one missed dose, a remedial regimen with a regular dose followed by the usual dose was suitable for a delay time of less than 6 h, while a replacement with a regular dose followed by a partial dose appeared to be appropriate for a delay time of 6 h and longer. This was justified based on the concerns of LEV toxicity when the remedial dose is close to the next scheduled dose. For two consecutive missed doses, a remedial dose with one and a half of the regular dose was suitable if the gap between that and the next dose was greater than 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate remedial dosage regimen for one and two consecutive missed doses of LEV have been proposed. These remedial regimens, however, should be applied with clinicians' judgment based on the clinical status of the patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The use of levetiracetam (LEV) has been increasing, given its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Numerous population pharmacokinetic studies for LEV have been conducted. However, there are some discrepancies regarding factors affecting its pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to summarize significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics as well as the need for dosage adjustments. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for population pharmacokinetic studies of LEV conducted using a nonlinear-mixed effect approach from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and Science Direct databases from their inception to March 2020. Information on study design, model methodologies, significant covariate-parameter relationships, and model evaluation was extracted. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Only two studies were conducted with a two-compartment model, while the rest were performed with a one-compartment structure. Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were the two most frequently identified covariates on LEV clearance (CLLEV). Additionally, postmenstrual age (PMA) or postnatal age (PNA) were significant predictors for CLLEV in neonates. Only three studies externally validated the models. Two studies conducted pharmacodynamic models for LEV with relatively small sample size. CONCLUSION: Significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics are highlighted in this review. For future research, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using a larger sample size should be conducted. From a clinical perspective, the published models should be externally evaluated before clinical implementation.

Effects of concurrent and staggered dosing of semi-solid enteral nutrients on pharmacokinetic behavior of antiepileptic drugs after oral administration in rats.

BACKGROUND: The use of enteral nutrients plays a highly important role in accurate nutrition management, but limited information is currently available on the cautionary points of semi-solid enteral nutrients. AIM: In this study, we examined whether the pharmacokinetic profiles of sodium valproate (SVA), levetiracetam (LEV), and carbamazepine (CBZ) are affected by altering the dosing time of RACOL®-NF Semi Solid for Enteral Use (RASS), a prescribed semi-solid formula. We also investigated whether the pharmacokinetic interaction observed in this study can be avoided by staggered dosing of the chemical drug and semi-solid enteral nutrient. METHODS: The plasma concentration of SVA, LEV and CBZ after oral administration was measured by LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: There was no difference in pharmacokinetic characteristics of SVA and LEV when the dosing time of RASS was altered. On the other hand, the plasma concentration of CBZ after oral administration at all sampling points decreased with the extension of the dosing time of RASS, which was consistent with the Cmax and AUC. However, no significant difference was observed in the pharmacokinetic profiles or parameters of CBZ between the short-term and long-term RASS dosing groups by prolonging the administered interval of CBZ and RASS for 2 hr. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the pharmacokinetic profiles of CBZ, but not SVA and LEV, after its oral administration are affected by the dosing time of RASS, but staggered administration of CBZ and RASS prevented their interaction.

Predictive Performance of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Levetiracetam in Children and Evaluation of Dosing Regimen.

Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug that exhibits high interindividual variability in serum concentrations in children. A population pharmacokinetic approach can be used to explain this variability and optimize dosing schemes. The objectives are to identify the best predictive population pharmacokinetic model for children and to evaluate recommended doses using simulations and Bayesian forecasting. A validation cohort included children treated with levetiracetam who had a serum drug concentration assayed during therapeutic drug monitoring. We assessed the predictive performance of all the population pharmacokinetic models published in the literature using mean prediction errors, root mean squared errors, and visual predictive checks. A population model was finally constructed on the data, and dose simulations were performed to evaluate doses. We included 267 levetiracetam concentrations ranging from 2 to 69 mg/L from 194 children in the validation cohort. Six published models were externally evaluated. Most of the models underestimated the variability of our population. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with allometric scaling was finally fitted on our data. In our cohort, 57% of patients had a trough concentration <12 mg/L and 12% <5 mg/L. To reach a trough concentration >5 mg/L, doses ≥30 mg/kg/d for patients ≤50 kg and ≥2000 mg/d for patients >50 kg are required. In our population, a high percentage of children had low trough concentrations. Our population pharmacokinetic model could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam in children.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lamotrigine, Lacosamide, and Levetiracetam in Dried Capillary Blood-Determination of Conversion Factors for Serum-Based Reference Ranges.

BACKGROUND: Drug concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are routinely determined from blood serum or plasma at trough levels (before intake of morning dose). In capillary blood collection, blood is taken from the fingertip with the aid of a disposable tool and dried on absorbent material. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique offers several advantages over the use of filter paper cards. The aim of this study was to determine conversion factors for the estimation of AED serum concentrations from capillary blood concentrations. METHODS: Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from adult inpatients with epilepsy who were treated with lacosamide (LCM, n = 30), lamotrigine (LTG, n = 40), and/or levetiracetam (LEV, n = 36). A validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method for dried blood samples for these AEDs was compared with routine serum laboratory methods. Method agreement was evaluated using different regression techniques, and the conversion factors were calculated. RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed a linear relationship between serum and capillary blood concentrations for all 3 AEDs (r ≥ 0.95). For LTG, the regression intercept was significantly different from 0, indicating that the relationship was linear, but not necessarily proportional. Although LEV and LCM concentrations tended to be lower in capillary blood than in serum (mean ratio of serum concentration to capillary blood concentration: 1.14 and 1.22, respectively), LTG concentrations were higher in capillary blood (mean ratio = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of serum concentrations from measured capillary blood concentrations is feasible for LCM, LTG, and LEV. A simple ratio approach using the mean ratio and Passing-Bablok regression showed the best results for all 3 AEDs. The volumetric absorptive microsampling technique facilitates the quantitative sample collection of capillary blood and overcomes the drawbacks associated with the classical dried blood spot technique.

A pharmacokinetic simulation study to assess the performance of a sparse blood sampling approach to quantify early drug exposure.

Estimating early exposure of drugs used for the treatment of emergent conditions is challenging because blood sampling to measure concentrations is difficult. The objective of this work was to evaluate predictive performance of two early concentrations and prior pharmacokinetic (PK) information for estimating early exposure. The performance of a modeling approach was compared with a noncompartmental analysis (NCA). A simulation study was performed using literature-based models for phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA). These models were used to simulate rich concentration-time profiles from 0 to 2 h. Profiles without residual unexplained variability (RUV) were used to obtain the true partial area under the curve (pAUC) until 2 h after the start of drug infusion. From the profiles with the RUV, two concentrations per patient were randomly selected. These concentrations were analyzed under a population model to obtain individual population PK (PopPK) pAUCs. The NCA pAUCs were calculated using a linear trapezoidal rule. Percent prediction errors (PPEs) for the PopPK pAUCs and NCA pAUCs were calculated. A PPE within ±20% of the true value was considered a success and the number of successes was obtained for 100 simulated datasets. For PHT, LEV, and VPA, respectively, the median value of the success statistics obtained using the PopPK approach of 81%, 92%, and 88% were significantly higher than the 72%, 80%, and 67% using the NCA approach (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test). This study provides a means by which early exposure can be estimated with good precision from two concentrations and a PopPK approach. It can be applied to other settings in which early exposures are of interest.

Bioequivalence and switchability of generic antiseizure medications (ASMs): A re-appraisal based on analysis of generic ASM products approved in Europe.

The safety of switching between generic products of antiseizure medications (ASMs) continues to be a hot topic in epilepsy management. The main reason for concern relates to the uncertainty on whether, and when, two generics found to be bioequivalent to the same brand (reference) product are bioequivalent to each other, and the risk of a switch between generics resulting in clinically significant changes in plasma ASM concentrations. This article addresses these concerns by discussing the distinction between bioequivalence and statistical testing for significant difference, the importance of intra-subject variability in interpreting bioequivalence studies, the stricter regulatory bioequivalence requirements applicable to narrow-therapeutic-index (NTI) drugs, and the extent by which currently available generic products of ASMs comply with such criteria. Data for 117 oral generic products of second-generation ASMs approved in Europe by the centralized, mutual recognition or decentralized procedure were analyzed based on a review of publicly accessible regulatory assessment reports. The analysis showed that for 99% of generic products assessed (after exclusion of gabapentin products), the 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for AUC (area under the drug concentration vs time curve) were narrow and wholly contained within the acceptance interval (90%-111%) applied to NTI drugs. Intra-subject variability for AUC was <10% for 53 (88%) of the 60 products for which this measure was reported. Many gabapentin generics showed broader, 90% CIs for bioequivalence estimates, and greater intra-subject variability, compared with generics of other ASMs. When interpreted within the context of other available data, these results suggest that any risk of non-bioequivalence between these individual generic products is small, and that switches across these products are not likely to result in clinically relevant changes in plasma drug exposure. The potential for variability in exposure when switching across generics is likely to be greatest for gabapentin.

Early Exposure of Fosphenytoin, Levetiracetam, and Valproic Acid After High-Dose Intravenous Administration in Young Children With Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus.

Fosphenytoin (FOS) and its active form, phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA) are commonly used second-line treatments of status epilepticus. However, limited information is available regarding LEV and VPA concentrations following high intravenous doses, particularly in young children. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial, a blinded, comparative effectiveness study of FOS, LEV, and VPA for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus provided an opportunity to investigate early drug concentrations. Patients aged ≥2 years who continued to seizure despite receiving adequate doses of benzodiazepines were randomly assigned to FOS, LEV, or VPA infused over 10 minutes. A sparse blood-sampling approach was used, with up to 2 samples collected per patient within 2 hours following drug administration. The objective of this work was to report early drug exposure of PHT, LEV, and VPA and plasma protein binding of PHT and VPA. Twenty-seven children with median (interquartile range) age of 4 (2.5-6.5) years were enrolled. The total plasma concentrations ranged from 69 to 151.3 µg/mL for LEV, 11.3 to 26.7 µg/mL for PHT and 126 to 223 µg/mL for VPA. Free fraction ranged from 4% to 19% for PHT and 17% to 51% for VPA. This is the first report in young children of LEV concentrations with convulsive status epilepticus as well as VPA concentrations after a 40 mg/kg dose. Several challenges limited patient enrollment and blood sampling. Additional studies with a larger sample size are required to evaluate the exposure-response relationships in this emergent condition.

Intramuscular atenolol and levetiracetam reduce mortality in a rat model of paraoxon-induced status epilepticus.

Organophosphorus (OP) compounds are chemical threat agents and are irreversible inhibitors of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase that lead to a hypercholinergic response that could include status epilepticus (SE). SE particularly targets the heart and brain and despite existing therapies, it is still associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Here, we investigated the effect of intramuscular (i.m.) adjunct therapy consisting of atenolol (AT) and levetiracetam (LV) when administered after paraoxon (POX)-induced SE. The combination therapy was administered twice daily for 2, 7, or 14 days. POX exposure in rats produced rapid SE onset that was treated with atropine, pralidoxime chloride, and midazolam. Here, AT + LV therapy produced significant reductions in POX SE mortality assessed at 30 days post-SE. AT + LV therapy exhibited muscle pathology inflammation scores that were not significantly different from saline-treated controls. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that the i.m. route achieved faster and stabler plasma therapeutic levels for both AT and LV under OP SE conditions compared with oral administrations. Our data provide evidence of the safety and efficacy of i.m. AT + LV therapy for reducing mortality following POX SE.

Pharmacokinetic Variability During Long-Term Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam in Patients With Dravet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiseizure medications (ASMs) may contribute to treatment optimization in individual patients. This study included patients with Dravet syndrome as they often require close monitoring because of polypharmacy with various ASMs. The aim was to use long-term TDM to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of ASMs in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with Dravet syndrome were collected from the TDM database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2008-2018). Concentration/(dose/kg)ratios (C/D ratios) were calculated for the ASMs and the concentration (C/C ratio) for N-desmethylclobazam. In patients with at least 3 measurements, the CV for C/D ratios for intrapatient and interpatient variability was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (30 male patients/23 female patients) between 2 and 50 years of age (mean, 16 years) were included. Pharmacokinetic variability of the total number of measurements of valproate (n = 417), clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (n = 328), and levetiracetam (n = 238) was determined. Interpatient variability was more pronounced than intrapatient variability (coefficient of variations: valproate, 65% vs. 24%; levetiracetam, 71% vs. 27%; and clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, 47%/77% vs. 35%/55%) (P < 0.01). Comedication with stiripentol (n = 16) increased the C/D ratio of valproate by 63% and of clobazam by 133% and the C/C ratio of N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam by 104% (P < 0.05). Younger age also contributed to pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term TDM revealed extensive variability in serum concentrations over time; the variability was lowest for levetiracetam, moderate for valproate, and highest for clobazam. Pharmacokinetic variability and interactions can thus be identified and adjusted to facilitate decision making to achieve the optimal treatment outcome.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of levetiracetam: investigation of factors affecting the clinical outcome.

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral levetiracetam therapy in drug refractory adult epileptic outpatients, as well as factors affecting them. Concentration-time data were collected at steady state, while seizure recurrence was monitored for 13 months. Non-linear mixed effects modeling was applied, and covariates assessed included weight, height, age, daily dose and creatinine clearance.Plasma concentrations of levetiracetam were best described by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model (V/F = 34.7 L) with first-order absorption (ka = 0.616 h-1) and clearance (CL/F = 3.26 L/h). Patient's CrCL was found to significantly affect levetiracetam clearance (beta = 0.795). Time to seizure occurrence followed an exponential distribution and the mean time to seizure occurrence was estimated Te = 22.08 days. Seizure rate per month followed a Poisson distribution, while mean seizure rate per month was estimated λ = 1.33. Daily dose significantly affected the mean estimated time to seizure (beta = -2.2) and the mean monthly seizure rate (beta = 2.27) in a reverse way. Using discrete time Markov chains, it was shown that the transition probability from focal seizures to focal to bilateral tonic-clonic is significantly altered in relation to patient's CrCL.Simulations showed that dose should be adjusted in relation to CrCL, while low doses of levetiracetam are more effective for seizure control. Modeling and simulation in every-day clinical practice may provide significant information for the optimization of seizure control using well-known agents.

A Practice-Based, Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study to Inform Levetiracetam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (PADRE-01).

Limited data exist on the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) methods on anti-epileptic drug pharmacokinetics (PK). This prospective practice-based PK study aims to assess the impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), a modality of CRRT, on levetiracetam PK in critically ill patients and to derive individualized dosing recommendations. Eleven patients receiving oral or intravenous levetiracetam and CVVH in various intensive care units at a large academic medical center were enrolled to investigate the need for dosing adjustments. Prefilter, postfilter, and ultrafiltrate samples were obtained before dosing, after the completion of the infusion or 1-hour postoral dose, and up to 6 additional time points postinfusion or postoral administration. Patient-specific blood and ultrafiltrate flow rates and laboratory values were also collected at the time of sampling. The average sieving coefficient (SC) for levetiracetam was 0.89 ± 0.1, indicating high filter efficiency. Six of the 11 patients experienced concentrations outside the reported therapeutic range (12-46 mg/L). The average volume of distribution was 0.73 L/kg. CVVH clearance contributes a major fraction of the total levetiracetam clearance (36-73%) in neurocritically ill patients. The average bias and precision of the estimated vs. observed total clearance value was ~ 10.6% and 21.5%. Major dose determinants were identified to be SC and effluent flow rate. Patients with higher ultrafiltrate rates will have increased drug clearance and, therefore, will require higher doses in order to match exposures seen in patients with normal renal function.