Pharmacogenetic Testing or Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Quantitative Framework.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenetic profiling and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have both been proposed to manage inter-individual variability (IIV) in drug exposure. However, determining the most effective approach for estimating exposure for a particular drug remains a challenge. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the circumstances in which pharmacogenetic profiling may outperform TDM in estimating drug exposure, under three sources of variability (IIV, inter-occasion variability [IOV], and residual unexplained variability [RUV]). METHODS: Pharmacokinetic models were selected from the literature corresponding to drugs for which pharmacogenetic profiling and TDM are both clinically considered approaches for dose individualization. The models were used to simulate relevant drug exposures (trough concentration or area under the curve [AUC]) under varying degrees of IIV, IOV, and RUV. RESULTS: Six drug cases were selected from the literature. Model-based simulations demonstrated that the percentage of patients for whom pharmacogenetic exposure prediction is superior to TDM differs for each drug case: tacrolimus (11.0%), tamoxifen (12.7%), efavirenz (49.2%), vincristine (49.6%), risperidone (48.1%), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (100%). Generally, in the presence of higher unexplained IIV in combination with lower RUV and IOV, exposure was best estimated by TDM, whereas, under lower unexplained IIV in combination with higher IOV or RUV, pharmacogenetic profiling was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: For the drugs with relatively low RUV and IOV (e.g., tamoxifen and tacrolimus), TDM estimated true exposure the best. Conversely, for drugs with similar or lower unexplained IIV (e.g., efavirenz or 5-FU, respectively) combined with relatively high RUV, pharmacogenetic profiling provided the most accurate estimate for most patients. However, genotype prevalence and the relative influence of genotypes on the PK, as well as the ability of TDM to accurately estimate AUC with a limited number of samples, had an impact. The results could be used to support clinical decision making when considering other factors, such as the probability for severe side effects.

Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Model of Z-Endoxifen Concentrations in Tamoxifen-Treated Patients from the CEPAM Cohort.

Tamoxifen is widely used in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The polymorphic enzyme CYP2D6 is primarily responsible for metabolic activation of tamoxifen, resulting in substantial interindividual variability of plasma concentrations of its most important metabolite, Z-endoxifen. The Z-endoxifen concentration thresholds below which tamoxifen treatment is less efficacious have been proposed but not validated, and prospective trials of individualized tamoxifen treatment to achieve Z-endoxifen concentration thresholds are considered infeasible. Therefore, we aim to validate the association between Z-endoxifen concentration and tamoxifen treatment outcomes, and identify a Z-endoxifen concentration threshold of tamoxifen efficacy, using pharmacometric modeling and simulation. As a first step, the CYP2D6 Endoxifen Percentage Activity Model (CEPAM) cohort was created by pooling data from 28 clinical studies (> 7,000 patients) with measured endoxifen plasma concentrations. After cleaning, data from 6,083 patients were used to develop a nonlinear mixed-effect (NLME) model for tamoxifen and Z-endoxifen pharmacokinetics that includes a conversion factor to allow inclusion of studies that measured total endoxifen but not Z-endoxifen. The final parent-metabolite NLME model confirmed the primary role of CYP2D6, and contributions from body weight, CYP2C9 phenotype, and co-medication with CYP2D6 inhibitors, on Z-endoxifen pharmacokinetics. Future work will use the model to simulate Z-endoxifen concentrations in patients receiving single agent tamoxifen treatment within large prospective clinical trials with long-term survival to identify the Z-endoxifen concentration threshold below which tamoxifen is less efficacious. Identification of this concentration threshold would allow personalized tamoxifen treatment to improve outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Towards clinical adherence monitoring of oral endocrine breast cancer therapies by LC-HRMS-method development, validation, comparison of four sample matrices, and proof of concept.

Oral endocrine therapies (OET) for breast cancer treatment need to be taken over a long period of time and are associated with considerable side effects. Therefore, adherence to OET is an important issue and of high clinical significance for breast cancer patients' caregivers. We hypothesized that a new bioanalytical strategy based on liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry might be suitable for unbiased adherence monitoring (AM) of OET. Four different biomatrices (plasma, urine, finger prick blood by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), oral fluid (OF)) were evaluated regarding their suitability for AM of the OET abemaciclib, anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole, palbociclib, ribociclib, tamoxifen, and endoxifen. An analytical method was developed and validated according to international recommendations. The analytical procedures were successfully validated in all sample matrices for most analytes, even meeting requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Chromatographic separation of analytes was achieved in less than 10 min and limits of quantification ranged from 1 to 1000 ng/mL. The analysis of 25 matching patient samples showed that AM of OET is possible using all four matrices with the exception of, e.g., letrozole and exemestane in OF. We were able to show that unbiased bioanalytical AM of OET was possible using different biomatrices with distinct restrictions. Sample collection of VAMS was difficult in most cases due to circulatory restraints and peripheral neuropathy in fingers and OF sampling was hampered by dry mouth syndrome in some cases. Although parent compounds could be detected in most of the urine samples, metabolites should be included when analyzing urine or OF. Plasma is currently the most suitable matrix due to available reference concentrations.

A Genome-Wide Association Study of Endoxifen Serum Concentrations and Adjuvant Tamoxifen Efficacy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Tamoxifen is part of the standard of care of endocrine therapy for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, survival outcomes with tamoxifen are highly variable. The concentration of endoxifen, the 30-100 times more potent metabolite of tamoxifen and bioactivated by the CYP2D6 enzyme, has been described as the most relevant metabolite of tamoxifen metabolism. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed with the objective to identify genetic polymorphisms associated with endoxifen serum concentration levels and clinical outcome in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen. A GWAS was conducted in 608 women of the CYPTAM study (NTR1509/PMID: 30120701). Germline DNA and clinical and survival characteristics were readily available. Genotyping was performed on Infinium Global Screening Array (686,082 markers) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) imputation by using 1000 Genomes. Relapse-free survival during tamoxifen (RFSt) was defined the primary clinical outcome. Endoxifen serum concentration was analyzed as a continuous variable. Several genetic variants reached genome-wide significance (P value: ≤5 × 10-8). Endoxifen concentrations analysis identified 430 variants, located in TCF20 and WBP2NL genes (chromosome 22), which are in strong linkage disequilibrium with CYP2D6 variants. In the RFSt analysis, several SNP were identified (LPP gene: rs77693286, HR 18.3, 95% CI: 15.2-21.1; rs6790761, OR 18.2, 95% CI: 15.5-21.1). Endoxifen concentrations have a strong association with the chromosome 22, which contains the CYP2D6 gene.

Preliminary results using a kit to measure tamoxifen and metabolites concentrations in capillary blood samples from women with breast cancer.

The aim of the study was to compare 3 blood sampling methods, including capillary blood sampling, for determining Tamoxifen (TAM), Z-endoxifen (END), and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT) concentrations. High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to quantify concentrations of TAM, END, and 4HT in plasma, venous blood, and capillary blood samples of 16 participants on TAM therapy for breast cancer. The rhelise kit was used for capillary sampling. Calibration curves using 13C-labeled analogs of TAM, END, and 4HT as internal standards were used for quantifications. A capillary sampling kit was used successfully for all participants. Mean TAM concentrations did not differ significantly in the 3 types of samples. Mean END and 4HT concentrations did differ significantly between capillary and venous blood samples, possibly related to photodegradation in the internal standards prior to use or degradation products with chromatographic retention times similar to the metabolites. TAM, END, and 4HT concentrations were relatively stable when stored for 14 days at 8 °C and 20 °C. Therapeutic drug monitoring of TAM using an innovative kit and capillary blood sampling is feasible. Preliminary data from this study will aid in developing a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of personalized TAM dose monitoring and adjustments, with the goal of enhancing the quality-of-life and outcomes of patients with breast cancer.Clinical Trial Identification: EudraCT No 2017-000641-44.

A preliminary study on the association of tamoxifen, endoxifen, and 4-hydroxytamoxifen with blood lipids in patients with breast cancer.

The long-term treatment with tamoxifen can alter the lipid profile of patients with breast cancer. Only a few studies associated the plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, endoxifen, and 4-hydroxytamoxifen with blood lipids, which is relevant as the distribution of these compounds for the tissues can be changed, negatively affecting the treatment. The variations in lipids also can account for the high interindividual variation in plasma concentrations of these compounds. The aim of this preliminary study was to associate the plasma levels of tamoxifen and the active metabolites with the lipid levels. An observational study of cases was conducted in patients with breast cancer using tamoxifen in a daily dose of 20 mg. The lipids were measured by spectrophotometric methods and the plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, endoxifen, and 4-hydroxytamoxifen by high-performance liquid chromatography. A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The median plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen were 62 ng/mL, 1.04 ng/mL and 8.79 ng/mL. Triglycerides levels ranged from 59 to 352 mg/dL, total cholesterol from 157 to 321 mg/dL, LDL-c from 72 mg/dL to 176 mg/dL and HDL-C from 25.1 mg/dL to 62.8 mg/dL. There were no significant associations between the plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and endoxifen with the levels of triglycerides and total cholesterol. The multivariate analysis revealed a weak association between plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and the active metabolites with HDL-c, LDL-c and VLDL-c. This finding provides preliminary evidence of the low impact of lipoproteins levels in the exposure to tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen.

Simplified phenotyping of CYP2D6 for tamoxifen treatment using the N-desmethyl-tamoxifen/ endoxifen ratio.

INTRODUCTION: CYP2D6 protein activity can be inferred from the ratio of N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDMT) to endoxifen (E). CYP2D6 polymorphisms are common and can affect CYP2D6 protein activity and E level. Some retrospective studies indicate that E < 16 nM may relate to worse outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A target NDMT/E ratio was defined as associated with an E level of 15 nM in the 161 patient Test cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients, dichotomizing them into 'Normal' (NM) and 'Slow' (SM) CYP2D6 metabolizer groups. This ratio was then tested on a validation cohort of 52 patients. Patients were phenotyped based on the standard method (ultrarapid/extensive, intermediate or poor metabolizers; UM/EM, IM, PM) or a simplified system based on whether any variant allele (V) vs wildtype (wt) was present (wt/wt, wt/V, V/V). Comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping was undertaken on germline DNA. RESULTS: A target NDMT/E ratio of 35 correlated with the 15 nM E level, dichotomizing patients into NM (<35; N = 117) and SM (>35; N = 44) groups. The ratio was independently validated by a validation cohort. The simplified system was better in predicting patients without slow metabolism, with specificity and sensitivity of 96% and 44% respectively, compared with the standard method - sensitivity 81% and specificity 83%. CONCLUSIONS: The simplified classification system based on whether any variant was present better identified patients who were truly not CYP2D6 slow metabolizers more accurately than the current system. However, as CYP2D6 genotype is not the only determinant of endoxifen level, we recommend that direct measurement of endoxifen should also be considered.

Endoxifen levels and metabolic phenotype-associated factors in Mexican Mestizo patients under tamoxifen treatment.

Aim: To evaluate plasma endoxifen levels and metabolic phenotype-associated factors in Mexican Mestizo patients under tamoxifen treatment. Patients & methods: A total of 138 breast cancer patients under tamoxifen treatment were cross-sectionally evaluated and side effects (SE) were recorded. CYP2D6 genetic phenotypes (GP) and metabolic phenotypes (MP) were assessed (metabolic poor [mPM], intermediate [mIM], normal [mNM], and ultrarapid [mUM] metabolizer). Associations were tested in uni-multivariate models for endoxifen >5.9 ng/ml and for mNM + mUM MP. Results: The main SE was hot flashes (62%). Distribution of the CYP2D6 MP was 4.3% mPM; 14.5% mIM; 75.4% mNM; and 5.8% mUM. Endoxifen >5.9 ng/ml was partially associated with SE (p = 0.06); the mNM + mUM MP was associated with treatment time (p = 0.03). Conclusion: The endoxifen-associated factors in Mexican Mestizo patients remain inconclusive, although treatment time was associated with MP.

Predicting steady-state endoxifen plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients by CYP2D6 genotyping or phenotyping. Which approach is more reliable?

In previous studies, steady-state Z-endoxifen plasma concentrations (ENDOss) correlated with relapse-free survival in women on tamoxifen (TAM) treatment for breast cancer. ENDOss also correlated significantly with CYP2D6 genotype (activity score) and CYP2D6 phenotype (dextromethorphan test). Our aim was to ascertain which method for assessing CYP2D6 activity is more reliable in predicting ENDOss. The study concerned 203 Caucasian women on tamoxifen-adjuvant therapy (20 mg q.d.). Before starting treatment, CYP2D6 was genotyped (and activity scores computed), and the urinary log(dextromethorphan/dextrorphan) ratio [log(DM/DX)] was calculated after 15 mg of oral dextromethorphan. Plasma concentrations of TAM, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (ND-TAM), Z-4OH-tamoxifen (4OH-TAM) and ENDO were assayed 1, 4, and 8 months after first administering TAM. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify the clinical and laboratory variables predicting log-transformed ENDOss (log-ENDOss). Genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotypes (PM, IM, NM, EM) and log(DM/DX) correlated independently with log-ENDOss. Genotype-phenotype concordance was almost complete only for poor metabolizers, whereas it emerged that 34% of intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid metabolizers were classified differently based on log(DM/DX). Multivariable regression analysis selected log(DM/DX) as the best predictor, with patients' age, weak inhibitor use, and CYP2D6 phenotype decreasingly important: log-ENDOss = 0.162 - log(DM/DX) × 0.170 + age × 0.0063 - weak inhibitor use × 0.250 + IM × 0.105 + (NM + UM) × 0.210; (R2  = 0.51). In conclusion, log(DM/DX) seems superior to genotype-derived CYP2D6 phenotype in predicting ENDOss.

Development and validation of a high throughput bioanalytical UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of tamoxifen and sulphoraphane in rat plasma: Application to an oral pharmacokinetic study.

Tamoxifen (TAM) is the choice of a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of estrogen-positive receptor (ER+) breast cancer. Sulphoraphane (SFN), a natural plant antioxidant compound, also acts on estrogen-positive breast cancer receptor. Thus, a combination of TAM with SFN is preferred as it helps to minimize the drug-related toxicity and increases the therapeutic efficacy by providing synergistic anticancer effects of both drugs. In the present study, a new simple, sensitive, precise, and selective UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of tamoxifen and sulphoraphane using propranolol as an internal standard (IS) in rat plasma. Chromatographic separation was achieved on reverse phase Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, i.d., 1.7 µm) with an isocratic mobile phase composed of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) and B (0.1% formic acid in water) (80:20, v/v) at a flow-rate of 0.4 mL/min. The detection and quantification of analytes was performed on Waters ZsprayTM Xevo TQD using selected-ion monitoring operated under a positive electrospray ionization mode. The transitions were m/z = 372.0 [M+H]+ → 71.92 for tamoxifen, m/z = 177.9 [M+H]+ → 113.9 for sulphoraphane and m/z = 260.3 [M+H]+ → 116.1 for propranolol. The method was linear over the concentration range of 8-500 ng/mL (r2 = 0.9996) for tamoxifen, 30-2000 ng/mL (r2 = 0.9998) for sulphoraphane with insignificant matrix effect and high extraction recovery on spiked quality control (QC) samples. The intra- and inter-batch precisions and accuracy were within the acceptable limits, and both the analytes were found to be stable throughout the short term, long term and freeze thaw stability studies. The validated method was successfully applied for the simultaneous estimation of TAM and SFN in an oral pharmacokinetic study in female Wistar rats. This developed UPLC-MS/MS method could be a valuable tool for future pharmacokinetic interaction, therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic characterization of novel formulations.

Obesity Alters Endoxifen Plasma Levels in Young Breast Cancer Patients: A Pharmacometric Simulation Approach.

Endoxifen is one of the most important metabolites of the prodrug tamoxifen. High interindividual variability in endoxifen steady-state concentrations (CSS,min ENDX ) is observed under tamoxifen standard dosing and patients with breast cancer who do not reach endoxifen concentrations above a proposed therapeutic threshold of 5.97 ng/mL may be at a 26% higher recurrence risk compared with patients with endoxifen concentrations exceeding this value. In this investigation, 10 clinical tamoxifen studies were pooled (1,388 patients) to investigate influential factors on CSS,min ENDX using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Age and body weight were found to significantly impact CSS,min ENDX in addition to CYP2D6 phenotype. Compared with postmenopausal patients, premenopausal patients had a 30% higher risk for subtarget CSS,min ENDX at tamoxifen 20 mg per day. In treatment simulations for distinct patient subpopulations, young overweight patients had a 3.1-13.8-fold higher risk for subtarget CSS,min ENDX compared with elderly low-weight patients. Considering ever-rising obesity rates and the clinical importance of tamoxifen for premenopausal patients, this subpopulation may benefit most from individualized tamoxifen dosing.

Serum Detection of Nonadherence to Adjuvant Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk.

PURPOSE: Nonadherence to long-term treatments is often under-recognized by physicians and there is no gold standard for its assessment. In breast cancer, nonadherence to tamoxifen therapy after surgery constitutes a major obstacle to optimal outcomes. We sought to evaluate the rate of biochemical nonadherence to adjuvant tamoxifen using serum assessment and to examine its effects on short-term, distant disease-free survival (DDFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 1,177 premenopausal women enrolled in a large prospective study (CANTO/NCT01993498). Definition of biochemical nonadherence was based on a tamoxifen serum level < 60 ng/mL, assessed 1 year after prescription. Self-reported nonadherence to tamoxifen therapy was collected at the same time through semistructured interviews. Survival analyses were conducted using an inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards model, using a propensity score based on age, staging, surgery, chemotherapy, and center size. RESULTS: Serum assessment of tamoxifen identified 16.0% of patients (n = 188) below the set adherence threshold. Patient-reported rate of nonadherence was lower (12.3%). Of 188 patients who did not adhere to the tamoxifen prescription, 55% self-reported adherence to tamoxifen. After a median follow-up of 24.2 months since tamoxifen serum assessment, patients who were biochemically nonadherent had significantly shorter DDFS (for distant recurrence or death, adjusted hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.06; P = .036), with 89.5% of patients alive without distant recurrence at 3 years in the nonadherent cohort versus 95.4% in the adherent cohort. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful method to promptly identify patients who do not take adjuvant tamoxifen as prescribed and are at risk for poorer outcomes. Targeted interventions facilitating patient adherence are needed and have the potential to improve short-term breast cancer outcomes.

Exposure-response analysis of endoxifen serum concentrations in early-breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is part of endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment. Studies have indicated the use of endoxifen concentrations, tamoxifen active metabolite, to guide tamoxifen efficacy. Three endoxifen thresholds have been suggested (5.9 ng/ml, 5.2 ng/ml and 3.3 ng/ml) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Our aim was to validate these thresholds and to examine endoxifen exposure with clinical outcome in early-breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. METHODS: Data from 667 patients from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were available. Patients were stratified (above or below), according to the endoxifen threshold values for tamoxifen efficacy and tested by Cox regression. Logistic regressions to estimate the probability of relapse and tamoxifen discontinuation were performed. RESULTS: None of the thresholds showed a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival: 5.2 ng/ml threshold: hazard ratio (HR): 2.545, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.912-7.096, p value: 0.074; 3.3 ng/ml threshold: HR: 0.728; 95% CI 0.421-1.258, p value: 0.255. Logistic regression did not show a statistically significant association between the risk of relapse (odds ratio (OR): 0.971 (95% CI 0.923-1.021, p value: 0.248) and the risk for tamoxifen discontinuation (OR: 1.006 95% CI 0.961-1.053, p value: 0.798) with endoxifen concentrations. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not confirm the endoxifen threshold values for TDM nor does it allow definition of a novel threshold. These findings indicate a limited value of TDM to guide tamoxifen efficacy.

Post-marketing assessment of generic tamoxifen in Brazilian breast cancer patients.

Generic formulations of tamoxifen are commonly prescribed to oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA). We carried out a post-marketing surveillance of the generic tamoxifen formulation in current use at INCA, by comparing plasma concentrations of the parent drug and metabolites obtained with the generic vs the reference formulation. Thirty patients participated in an open-label, bracketed protocol, comprising 3 successive phases of 30-32 days each: the generic formulation was used in phases 1 and 3 and the reference formulation in phase 2. Two blood samples were collected in the last 4 days of each phase, for LC-MS/MS quantification of tamoxifen and metabolites in plasma. The median plasma concentrations (ng/mL) for the reference formulation were as follows: tamoxifen, 135.0 (CI 95% 114.2-155.8); endoxifen, 35.3 (30.0-40.8); and 4-hydroxytamoxifen, 4.8 (4.2-5.4). The endoxifen/tamoxifen plasma concentration ratio was 0.27 (0.21-0.25). ANOVA detected no statistically significant difference in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, metabolites or the endoxifen/tamoxifen ratio among the three phases. The genetic component (rGC) of the CYP2D6-mediated conversion of tamoxifen into endoxifen, estimated using the repeated drug administration procedure across the three phases, was 0.87, pointing to an important component of genetic variability. In conclusion, this first post-marketing surveillance trial of oncologic generic drugs carried out in Brazilian patients verified the switchability between the reference and the generic tamoxifen formulation currently used at our institution. The adopted bracketed protocol adds confidence to this conclusion and may serve as a frame for future trials of post-marketing assessment of other generic drug products.

The Influences of Adherence to Tamoxifen and CYP2D6 Pharmacogenetics on Plasma Concentrations of the Active Metabolite (Z)-Endoxifen in Breast Cancer.

Tamoxifen efficacy in breast cancer is suspected to depend on adherence and intact drug metabolism. We evaluated the role of adherence behavior and pharmacogenetics on the formation rate of (Z)-endoxifen. In 192 Brazilian patients, we assessed plasma levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment (liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry), adherence behavior (Morisky, Green, and Levine medication adherence scale), and cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and other pharmacogene polymorphisms (matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionization time of flight) mass spectrometry, real-time polymerase chain reaction). Adherence explained 47% of the variability of tamoxifen plasma concentrations (P < 0.001). Although CYP2D6 alone explained 26.4%, the combination with adherence explained 40% of (Z)-endoxifen variability at 12 months (P < 0.001). The influence of low adherence to not achieving relevant (Z)-endoxifen levels was highest in patients with noncompromised CYP2D6 function (relative risk 3.65; 95% confidence interval 1.48-8.99). As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated that (Z)-endoxifen levels are influenced both by patient adherence to tamoxifen and CYP2D6, which is particularly relevant for patients with full CYP2D6 function.

Hormonal status affects plasma exposure of tamoxifen and its main metabolites in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is considered a prodrug of its active metabolite endoxifen, which is dependent on the CYP2D6 and CYP3A enzymes. Tamoxifen pharmacokinetic variability influences endoxifen exposure and, consequently, its clinical outcome. This study investigated the impact of hormonal status on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its metabolites in TAM-treated breast cancer patients. METHODS: TAM-treated breast cancer patients (n = 40) previously believed to have CYP3A activity within the normal range based on oral midazolam and phenotyped as CYP2D6 normal metabolizers using oral metoprolol were divided into two groups according to premenopausal (n = 20; aged 35-50 years) or postmenopausal (n = 20; aged 60-79 years) status. All patients were treated with 20 mg/day tamoxifen for at least three months. Serial plasma samples were collected within the 24 h dose interval for analysis of unchanged tamoxifen, endoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen quantified by LC-MS/MS. CYP activities were assessed using midazolam apparent clearance (CYP3A) and the metoprolol/alfa-hydroxymetoprolol plasma metabolic ratio (CYP2D6). CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP2D6 SNPs and copy number variation were investigated using TaqMan assays. RESULTS: Postmenopausal status increased steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of tamoxifen (116.95 vs 201.23 ng/mL), endoxifen (8.01 vs 18.87 ng/mL), N-desmethyltamoxifen (485.16 vs 843.88 ng/mL) and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (2.67 vs 4.11 ng/mL). The final regression models included hormonal status as the only predictor for Css of tamoxifen [ß-coef ± SE, p-value (75.03 ± 17.71, p = 0.0001)] and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (1.7822 ± 0.4385, p = 0.0002), while endoxifen Css included hormonal status (8.578 ± 3.402, p = 0.02) and race (11.945 ± 2.836, p = 0.007). For N-desmethyltamoxifen Css, the final model was correlated with hormonal status (286.259 ± 76.766, p = 0.0007) and weight (- 8.585 ± 3.060, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The premenopausal status was associated with decreased endoxifen plasma concentrations by 135% compared to postmenopausal status. Thus, the endoxifen plasma concentrations should be monitored mainly in the premenopausal period to maintain plasma levels above the efficacy threshold value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RBR-7tqc7k.

Evaluation of the Synergism Mechanism of Tamoxifen and Docetaxel by Nanoparticles.

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies have shown that Docetaxel (DTX) and Tamoxifen (TMX) loaded nanoparticles(Co-NPs) could exhibit a synergistic effect on estrogen receptor positive cell lines. In the current study，we have studied the synergistic effect of Co-NPs and underlying possible molecular mechanism. METHODS: Cell apoptosis assay, pharmacokinetic experiment and immunohistochemistry experiment were used to explore the synergistic effect and underlying possible mechanism in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: Cell apoptosis assay revealed that Co-NPs could mediate cell sensitization to a cytotoxic agent, resulting in remarkable cell apoptosis. In addition, pharmacokinetic experiment research showed that Co-NPs have longer circulation time in vivo, which could prolong the treatment time of the chemotherapeutic drugs. Immunohistochemistry experiment revealed that the Co-NPs could downregulate the expression of P-gp level to reduce the drugs' efflux. CONCLUSION: The possible mechanism of the synergistic effect of DTX and TMX by Co-NPs was attributed to the longer in vivo circulation time, significantly increased rate of cell apoptosis and downregulated expression of P-gp level to the tumor cells.

Plasma endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen levels in CYP2D6(C100T) carrying breast cancer patients and association with serum cholesterol.

Breast cancer patients with high cholesterol biosynthesis signature had poorer therapeutic outcome. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 is crucial in the oxidation of tamoxifen to generate active metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. CYP2D6 variants with C100T substitution encode null or poor functional proteins. This study aims to examine the association of C100T genotypes and serum lipid levels with plasma drug levels in patients. Plasma tamoxifen concentration was positively associated with serum triglyceride concentration, adjusting for age and C100T genotype. Overweight (body mass index >24.0) patients with high serum cholesterol (≥200 mg/dL) had increased risks of ineffective endoxifen levels (<5.97 ng/mL). Compared to the low-cholesterol group, the high-cholesterol group had a lower 4-hydroxytamoxifen or endoxifen level in T/T carriers. In T/T carriers, the high-cholesterol group had an increased risk of an ineffective endoxifen level. Metastasis, hot flash/flushing, and high alanine transaminase did not relate to plasma 4-hydroxytamoxifen or endoxifen levels. Results indicate that C100T and high serum cholesterol are risk factors of ineffective endoxifen levels in Taiwanese breast cancer patients. These findings warrant further studies of a large hypercholesterolemic population to examine the outcome of increased doses of tamoxifen.

Tamoxifen-induced severe hot flashes and endoxifen levels: is dose reduction a safe and effective strategy?

OBJECTIVES: Severe hot flash (HF) toxicity due to tamoxifen can compromise compliance. We previously found that HFs did not correlate with endoxifen level or CYP2D6 genotype. In this study, we reduced tamoxifen dose in patients with severe HFs to determine whether HFs were ameliorated whilst maintaining a purported therapeutic endoxifen level of >15 nM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with severe HFs on 20 mg TAM had CYP2D6genotype, trough level tamoxifen and metabolites measured with Loprinzi HF scores (HFS) derived before and after DR of tamoxifen to 10 mg. Other data collected included demographics, smoking, alcohol, menstrual and breast cancer history, previous chemotherapies, concurrent medications, BMI and other tamoxifen toxicities. RESULTS: At the 20 mg tamoxifen dose, endoxifen levels were 25.6, 0-91.9 nM (median, range) with HFS 131, 22-1482 (median, range). Upon DR to 10 mg, median endoxifen level fell to 14.1, 0.6-71.9 nM (difference in means p = 0.11, two-tailed T test) with HFS 47, 5-864 (difference in means p = 0.24, two-tailed T test). Despite lacking statistical significance, 85% of patients reported subjective improvement of HFs with DR. After DR, the proportion of patients with endoxifen level <15 nM increased from 20% to 50%. HFS did not correlate with any other parameter. CONCLUSION: DR of tamoxifen from 20 mg to 10 mg daily resulted in halving of endoxifen levels and subjective improvement of HF. While half the dose-reduced patients were below a potential therapeutic level of endoxifen, other recent studies suggest that low endoxifen levels may not indicate reduced effectiveness of tamoxifen.