Is a guideline required to predict the intensive care unit need of patients over 65 years of age during the pre-operative period? A comparison of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, lung ultrasound score, Charlson age-added comorbidity index, surgi.

BACKGROUND: All pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative variables of the patients at 65 years of age who had a surgi-cal procedure determine the necessity of post-operative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring. The indication for post-operative ICU is detected through ideal scoring systems related to the surgery and anesthesia that will be performed easily and fast would prevent the development of morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, lung ultrasound score (LUSS), Charlson age-added comorbidity index (CACI), and surgical outcome risk tool (SORT) score of the indication for ICU. The hypothesis of our study is to show that real visual LUSS is superior to the screening test SORT, CACI, and the other score, ASA, for ICU indication determination. METHODS: The study enrolled 101 patients over 65 years of age who will have surgical procedures under elective conditions. De-mographic features, clinical parameters, ICU indications, ASA, LUSS, CACI, and SORTs of the patients were calculated prospectively and recorded. The effects of patients' ASA, LUSS, CACI, and SORT on determining the need for postoperative ICU admission were examined. RESULTS: The age of patients who needed post-operative ICU admission was significantly higher than those who did not need post-operative ICU admission (P<0.001). The groups did not show differences in terms of gender, body mass index, smoking, and type of anesthesia (P>0.05). ASA, LUSS, CACI, and SORT were significantly higher for patients who needed post-operative ICU admission (P<0.001). The proportion of patients who needed post-operative ICU admission was higher for patients with post-operative ICU indication (P<0.001). The number of consultations was significantly higher for patients who needed post-operative ICU admission (P<0.001). SORT was found to be the highest accuracy for predicting the need for post-operative ICU admission. CONCLUSION: It was detected that ASA, LUSS, CACI, and SORT are effective for the determination of the ICU indication in the pre-operative evaluation process of patients over the age of 65 who had elective surgery. However, the efficiency of SORT was found to be superior to the others.

The impact of a preanesthesia assessment clinic on scheduled elective case cancelations at a Thai university hospital.

Elective surgical case cancelations negatively impact healthcare systems and patient dissatisfaction. Preanesthesia assessment clinics (PACs) have been established in many countries to facilitate preoperative medical optimization. However, their benefits for elective procedure cancelations in Thailand have not been formally assessed. This study evaluated the impact of a PAC on scheduled elective surgical case cancelations at a Thai university hospital. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted for the period covering from May 2016 to April 2017. We included all scheduled elective surgical cases at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, canceled on the day of surgery. The cancelation incidences of patients attending and not attending the PAC were compared. Cancellation reasons were categorized as "patient issue," "hospital-facility issue," "surgeon issue," "anesthesiologist issue," "medical condition," and "miscellaneous." The PAC patients' reasons were rigorously explored to determine their preventability. There were 30,351 scheduled elective procedures during the study period. The case-cancelation incidences were 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.2%) for patients visiting the PAC and 5.9% (95% CI, 5.6-6.3%) for those who did not. Medical conditions were the most common reason for cancelation for non-PAC patients (27.3%), whereas hospital-facility issues were the most frequent for PAC patients (43.8%). The cancelation rate for patient issues was significantly lower in the PAC group (4.2% vs 20.7%; P < .05). Thirty-one (64.6%) of the PAC patients' cancelations were potentially preventable. Of the 15 PAC patient cancelations related to medical conditions, 12 were for patients with a history of acute illness and were determined to be nonpreventable. Visiting the PAC was significantly associated with a decreased elective-case cancelation rate. Cancellations were most frequently related to hospital-facility issues for patients visiting the PAC and medical conditions for those who did not. Some PAC patient cancelations for medical conditions involved unpreventable acute patient illnesses. Clinical Trials.gov (NCT02816281).

Outpatient percutaneous image-guided microwave ablation with monitored anesthesia care: An exploratory study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and periprocedural perception of pain for a combination approach of moderate and deep sedation for image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of both primary and secondary malignant lesions. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 33 image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation procedures performed on 33 patients in an outpatient-based interventional radiology center. We used a combination of midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and/or ketamine to achieve mild to moderate sedation for the procedure, and also to achieve deeper sedation as needed for the ablation portion. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation procedures. Mean procedural time was 49.4 min. There were no major complications. Intraprocedural pain was absent in all patients. All 33 patients were deemed fit for discharge within 30 min following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The combination approach of moderate and deep sedation for anesthesia during image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is an advantageous option. This approach has a strong safety profile, good technical success, short procedure times, low levels of intraprocedural and post-procedural pain, and short recovery from anesthesia.

[Modern approaches to the components of multimodal antinociceptive protection in patients with ovarian cancer]. / Sovremennye podkhody k komponentam mul'timodal'noi antinotsitseptivnoi zashchity u bol'nykh rakom yaichnikov.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze the effectiveness of the inclusion of a stress-limiting metabolic component into multimodal anesthesia (MMA) in patients operated for ovarian cancer. METHODS: A randomized study of the effectiveness of several variants of MMA was conducted in 65 patients with ovarian cancer 55.6±10.3 years old. Prior to the operation, a two-sided TAR block was performed. Anesthesia was maintained by sevoflurane. Analgesia was realized with lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, fentanyl, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The patients were divided into 2 groups. In the 1st (n=36) group, in order to expand the stress-limiting capabilities of MMA, before surgery, intraoperatively and in the next three days, Remaxol was included. In the 2nd (n=29) group, Remaxol was not used. Biochemical parameters were studied: POL/AOS, stress and antistress reactions, the content of C-reactive protein, haptoglobin and liver enzymes. RESULTS: Before the operation, the examined patients revealed dysregulation of the antioxidant system, endogenous intoxication (EI), intensification of the systemic inflammatory response, and fermentopathy. The results obtained in the groups depended on the nature of the MMA used. In the group where Remaxol was used as a metabolic component of MMA, there was a change in the dynamics of antistress reactions, characterized by a directed intergroup vector of increased resistance, with a predominance of the development of long-term adaptation processes, allowing to prevent the formation of disorders in the POL/AOS system, to reduce the concentration of acute phase proteins, fermentopathy. CONCLUSION: The introduction of Remaxol into MMA improves the quality of antinociceptive protection, promotes regression of POL products, and prevents the progression of hepatopathy and EI, contributing to the development of stress-limiting mechanisms of long-term adaptation in patients with ovarian cancer in the intra and near perioperative period.

Characterization of combined endoscopies and aerodigestive care: An analysis of utilization and financial feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Aerodigestive care is one model of multi-disciplinary care, which is a valuable tool for both providers and patients. Aerodigestive care models are associated with improved outcomes, reduced anesthesia exposure, reduction in hospital admissions, and fewer days of missed work or school. This is the first study to explore national usage and cost trends in combined endoscopy utilization to identify gaps in care and the potential for financial resource optimization. METHODS: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kid's Inpatient Sample (KID) was used from 2016 and 2019. Diagnoses and procedures were identified using ICD-10 codes, for patients with hospital length of stay less than 1 day. Demographic data were identified, and survey-weighted means and proportions were computed. Bivariate comparisons were made using Rao Scott Chi-Square tests. National estimates of charges were computed with discharge weights, developed using the American Hospital Association (AHA) universe. KEY RESULTS: White, high-income patients, and those at urban teaching hospitals received the greatest proportion of combined endoscopic procedures. The cost/charges associated with combined endoscopies are less than for separate gastrointestinal (GI) or airway only endoscopies combined. However, combined procedures comprise a smaller share of national aggregate cost. CONCLUSIONS: National utilization trends highlight racial and socioeconomic disparities and suggest differences in access based on hospital characteristics, despite the reduced cost/charges of the combined procedure. For patients with a need for combined aerodigestive procedures, there appears to be a cost-savings opportunity to increase efforts for combined procedures at the level of the clinician or hospital.

Risk factors for failure of manipulation under anesthesia in posttraumatic knee stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients who fail manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) as a treatment for posttraumatic knee stiffness and determine the risk factors for MUA failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a level I trauma center. We identified 213 knees in 199 patients with arthrofibrosis treated by MUA within 1 year of injury from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was MUA failure as defined by need for repeat MUA or surgical release after MUA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between MUA failure and potential risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, 111 knees (52%) failed treatment with MUA. An association was demonstrated between MUA failure and delay in treatment >90 days after injury (OR 3.6, p < 0.01), neurologic injury (OR 2.2, p = 0.02), and pre-procedure knee flexion <45° (OR 1.9, p < 0.01). The rate of failure for knees with no risk factors was 0% (0 of 14), 37% for knees with one risk factor (27 of 73), and 67% (84 of 126) for knees with two or more risk factors. CONCLUSION: For patients whose MUA is delayed beyond 90 days postinjury, pre-manipulation knee flexion is <45°, or those with associated neurologic injury; odds of MUA failing to correct posttraumatic arthrofibrosis are significantly increased. The likelihood of obtaining adequate range of motion (ROM) with MUA alone is lower than reported in other populations, with a higher likelihood of being treated with surgical release or additional MUA to attempt to obtain adequate ROM.

Reading man flap in four dogs: a case series.

BACKGROUND: The reading man flap is a novel technique in human medicine for the closure of cutaneous circular defects. To the best of our knowledge, no recent clinical studies have described this procedure in small animals. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case series, we present four dogs in which neoplasms were reconstructed using the reading man procedure, which is a double-advancement transposition subdermal flap. The reading man flap was applied in wound revision after surgical removal of a neoplasm in two dogs and in the closure following the excision of a neoplasm in another two dogs. Successful tension-free closure of the lesion site was achieved in all four patients. The postoperative period was uneventful in all patients, and there was no flap necrosis or surgical site infection, although surgical site infection preceded in two cases. Minor complications included partial suture dehiscence in one dog and seroma formation in two dogs. Only one dog required a second anesthesia to insert an active drainage system. The follow-up examination of all four dogs revealed no further complications with the reading man flap at time of the latest wound reevaluation conducted by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: The reading man flap is a well-vascularized fasciocutaneous flap that provides tension-free closure owing to its asymmetrical Z-plasty. It is a simple-to-use option for the closure of circular skin lesions in dogs.

Impact of Remimazolam versus Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Cerebral Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure during Gynecological Laparoscopy with Mild Hypercapnia.

BACKGROUND Remimazolam has the advantage of better hemodynamic stability compared with other anesthetics. We compared the effects of remimazolam and sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation, intracranial pressure, and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during mild hypercapnia in patients undergoing laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-two patients (20-65 years old) scheduled for gynecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to either the remimazolam (n=31) or sevoflurane (n=31) group. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) were recorded. Intracranial pressure was measured using the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). RESULTS The change over time in rSO2 did not differ between groups (P=0.056). The change in ONSD over time showed a significant intergroup difference (P=0.002). ONSD significantly changed over time (P=0.034) in the sevoflurane group but not in the remimazolam group (P=0.115). The changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate over time showed significant intergroup differences (P=0.045 and 0.031, respectively). The length of stay and the use of rescue antiemetics and analgesics in the postanesthetic care unit were significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (P=0.023, 0.038, and 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Remimazolam can provide a favorable hemodynamic profile and attenuate the increase in ONSD during gynecological laparoscopy compared with sevoflurane anesthesia during lung-protective ventilation with mild hypercapnia. Remimazolam can provide faster and better postoperative recovery than sevoflurane anesthesia.

Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is frequent. While two network meta-analyses assessed the impact of pharmacological interventions to prevent CSA-AKI, none focused on non-pharmacological interventions. We aim to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Central and clinical trial registries from January 1, 2004 (first consensus definition of AKI) to July 1, 2023. Additionally, we conducted manual screening of abstracts of major anesthesia and intensive care conferences over the last 5 years and reference lists of relevant studies. We selected all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI, without language restriction. We excluded RCTs of heart transplantation or involving a pediatric population. The primary outcome variable was CSA-AKI. Two reviewers independently identified trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: We included 86 trials (25,855 patients) evaluating 10 non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI. No intervention had high-quality evidence to reduce CSA-AKI. Two interventions were associated with a significant reduction in CSA-AKI incidence, with moderate quality of evidence: goal-directed perfusion (RR, 0.55 [95% CI 0.40-0.76], I2 = 0%; Phet = 0.44) and remote ischemic preconditioning (RR, 0.86 [0.78-0.95]; I2 = 23%; Phet = 0.07). Pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with a significant reduction in CSA-AKI incidence but with very low quality of evidence (RR = 0.69 [0.48; 0.99]; I2 = 53%; Phet < 0.01). We found high quality of evidence for lack of effect of restrictive transfusion strategy (RR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.92; 1.12; Phet = 0.67; I2 = 3%) and tight glycemic control (RR, 0.86 [95% CI 0.55; 1.35]; Phet = 0.25; I2 = 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Two non-pharmacological interventions are likely to reduce CSA-AKI incidence, with moderate quality of evidence: goal-directed perfusion and remote ischemic preconditioning.

Prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification from preoperative clinical text narratives using natural language processing.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHR) contain large volumes of unstructured free-form text notes that richly describe a patient's health and medical comorbidities. It is unclear if perioperative risk stratification can be performed directly from these notes without manual data extraction. We conduct a feasibility study using natural language processing (NLP) to predict the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA-PS) as a surrogate measure for perioperative risk. We explore prediction performance using four different model types and compare the use of different note sections versus the whole note. We use Shapley values to explain model predictions and analyze disagreement between model and human anesthesiologist predictions. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of EHR notes from patients undergoing procedures with anesthesia care spanning all procedural specialties during a 5 year period who were not assigned ASA VI and also had a preoperative evaluation note filed within 90 days prior to the procedure. NLP models were trained for each combination of 4 models and 8 text snippets from notes. Model performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). Shapley values were used to explain model predictions. Error analysis and model explanation using Shapley values was conducted for the best performing model. RESULTS: Final dataset includes 38,566 patients undergoing 61,503 procedures with anesthesia care. Prevalence of ASA-PS was 8.81% for ASA I, 31.4% for ASA II, 43.25% for ASA III, and 16.54% for ASA IV-V. The best performing models were the BioClinicalBERT model on the truncated note task (macro-average AUROC 0.845) and the fastText model on the full note task (macro-average AUROC 0.865). Shapley values reveal human-interpretable model predictions. Error analysis reveals that some original ASA-PS assignments may be incorrect and the model is making a reasonable prediction in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: Text classification models can accurately predict a patient's illness severity using only free-form text descriptions of patients without any manual data extraction. They can be an additional patient safety tool in the perioperative setting and reduce manual chart review for medical billing. Shapley feature attributions produce explanations that logically support model predictions and are understandable to clinicians.

A comparative study of esketamine-dexmedetomidine and sufentanil-dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in lung tumor percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA): a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To observe and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Esketamine or Sufentanil combined with Dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in lung tumor percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) to provide a clinical basis for the optimization of sedation and analgesia in lung tumor PRFA protocols outside the operating room. METHODS: In this trial, 44 patients aged 37 to 84 undergoing lung tumor PRFA were enrolled and assigned to Group E (n = 22, Esketamine 0.2 mg/kg) or Group S (n = 22,Sufentanil 0.1 µg/kg ). Dexmedetomidine was infused intravenously as a sedative in both groups. The modified observer's assessment of alertness and sedation scale (MOAAS), physical movement pain scale, intraoperative vital signs, anesthesia recovery time, radiologist and patient satisfaction rates, incidence of respiratory depression, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded. RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference in the physical movement pain scale, blood oxygen saturation or incidence of perioperative adverse events between the two groups during ablation, the MOAAS, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were higher in Group E than in Group S. The anesthesia recovery time was shorter in Group E than in Group S, and radiologist satisfaction was better in Group E than in Group S, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Esketamine or Sufentanil combined with Dexmedetomidine is safe for lung tumor PRFA. However, in elderly patients with multiple underlying diseases, low-dose Esketamine combined with Dexmedetomidine has fewer hemodynamic effects on patients, milder respiratory depression, shorter recovery time, and better radiologist satisfaction because of its better controllability of sedation depth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number#ChiCTR ChiCTR21000500 21); Date of Registration: 16/08/2021.

The Anesthesiology Physician-Scientist Pipeline: Current Status and Recommendations for Future Growth-An Initiative of the Anesthesia Research Council.

The limited number and diversity of resident physicians pursuing careers as physician-scientists in medicine has been a concern for many decades. The Anesthesia Research Council aimed to address the status of the anesthesiology physician-scientist pipeline, benchmarked against other medical specialties, and to develop strategic recommendations to sustain and expand the number and diversity of anesthesiology physician-scientists. The working group analyzed data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the National Resident Matching Program to characterize the diversity and number of research-oriented residents from US and international allopathic medical schools entering 11 medical specialties from 2009 to 2019. Two surveys were developed to assess the research culture of anesthesiology departments. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding information awarded to anesthesiology physician-scientists and departments was collected from NIH RePORTER and the Blue Ridge Medical Institute. Anesthesiology ranked eighth to tenth place of 11 medical specialties in the percent of "research-oriented" entering residents, defined as those with advanced degrees (Master's or PhDs) in addition to the MD degree or having published at least 3 research publications before residency. Anesthesiology ranked eighth of 11 specialties in the percent of entering residents who were women but ranked fourth of 11 specialties in the percent of entering residents who self-identified as belonging to an underrepresented group in medicine. There has been a 72% increase in both the total NIH funding awarded to anesthesiology departments and the number of NIH K-series mentored training grants (eg, K08 and K23) awarded to anesthesiology physician-scientists between 2015 and 2020. Recommendations for expanding the size and diversity of the anesthesiology physician-scientist pipeline included (1) developing strategies to increase the number of research intensive anesthesiology departments; (2) unifying the diverse programs among academic anesthesiology foundations and societies that seek to grow research in the specialty; (3) adjusting American Society of Anesthesiologists metrics of success to include the number of anesthesiology physician-scientists with extramural research support; (4) increasing the number of mentored awards from Foundation of Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER) and International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS); (5) supporting an organized and concerted effort to inform research-oriented medical students of the diverse research opportunities within anesthesiology should include the specialty being represented at the annual meetings of Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) students and the American Physician Scientist Association, as well as in institutional MSTP programs. The medical specialty of anesthesiology is defined by new discoveries and contributions to perioperative medicine which will only be sustained by a robust pipeline of anesthesiology physician-scientists.

Integration of functional capacity to medically necessary, time-sensitive scoring system: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 2 new modifications to medically necessary, time-sensitive (MeNTS) scoring systems integrating functional capacity assessment in estimating intensive care unit (ICU) requirements. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients undergoing elective surgeries between July 2021 and January 2022. The MeNTS scores and our 2 modified scores: MeNTS-METs (integrated Duke activity status index [DASI] as metabolic equivalents [METs]) and MeNTS-DASI-5Q (integrated modified DASI [M-DASI] as 5 questions) were calculated. The patients' ICU requirements (group ICU+ and group ICU-), DASIs, patient-surgery-anesthesia characteristics, hospital stay lengths, rehospitalizations, postoperative complications, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: This study analyzed 718 patients. The MeNTS, MeNTS-METs, and MeNTS-DASI-5Q scores were higher in group ICU+ than in group ICU- (p<0.001). Group ICU+ had longer operation durations and hospital stay lengths (p<0.001), lower DASI scores (p<0.001), and greater hospital readmissions, postoperative complications, and mortality (p<0.001). The MeNTS-METs and MeNTS-DASI-5Q scores better predicted ICU requirement with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.806 and 0.804, than the original MeNTS (AUC=0.782). CONCLUSION: The 5-questionnaire M-DASI is easy to calculate and, when added to a triage score, is as reliable as the original DASI for predicting postoperative ICU requirements.

The art of chasing numbers in titration of anaesthetic dose.

There is no difference in between-patient variability of concentrations when comparing propofol and sevoflurane titrated to a bispectral index of 40-60. There is about a 300% variation in hypnotic concentration between the bottom 5% and top 5% of the population. Anaesthesia titration cannot be based solely on measured or estimated drug concentrations.