Effect of sodium fluorescein strip application on cornea parameters commonly used in laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis.

To assess the effect of sodium fluorescein (NaF) strip on corneal parameters commonly used in Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Eighty-six subjects (172 eyes) scheduled for LASIK were recruited between January and March 2022. The study and statistical analysis test were conducted in April 2022. Topographic measurements of corneal parameters, including central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior keratometric (K) readings (K1, flat keratometry; K2, steep keratometry), horizontal corneal diameter (white to white, WTW), and corneal asphericity (Q value), were obtained using a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam) before and 10 min after NaF strip treatmentThe Pentacam recorded a small significant increase in CCT (mean 538.88 ± 28.78 µm to 547.90 ± 29.94 µm; p < .001), with no differences in K1 and K2 (mean 42.24 ± 1.35D to 42.24 ± 1.35D, and mean 43.34 ± 1.50D to 43.32 ± 1.51D; P > .05, for all) as well as WTW(mean 11.58 ± 0.32 mm to 11.58 ± 0.32 mm, P > .05) before and after NaF strip intervention. Furthermore, there was no significant difference was observed in Q value (mean - 0.30 ± 0.13 to - 0.30 ± 0.14, P > .05). These results indicate that clinicians should avoid NaF strip application before obtaining precise topographic measurements of cornea parameters using the Pentacam.

Comparing Effective Optical Zones After Myopic Ablation Between LASIK, PRK, and SMILE With Correlation to Higher Order Aberrations.

PURPOSE: To explore size, decentration, and eccentricity of effective optical zones (EOZs) in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and correlate them to higher order aberrations (HOAs). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 188 eyes that underwent refractive surgery for compound myopia (61 LASIK, 84 PRK, 43 SMILE). EOZ measurements were determined using 1-year postoperative Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) tangential difference maps. HOA data were measured using Pentacam wavefront aberration Zernike polynomials. Correlations between EOZs and HOAs were analyzed. RESULTS: The EOZs of LASIK and PRK are smaller than SMILE at 19.54 ± 1.44, 19.39 ± 1.66, and 22.18 ± 2.61 mm2, respectively (P < .001). No difference existed in absolute decentration from corneal vertex (P = .078) or pupil center (P = .131), but horizontal and vertical components differed significantly (P < .001). Smaller EOZ areas were correlated with greater spherical aberration induction (rLASIK = -0.378, rPRK = -0.555, rSMILE = -0.501) and total HOA induction in all groups. Absolute decentration from corneal vertex positively correlated with total HOA (rLASIK = 0.396, rPRK = 0.463, rSMILE = 0.399) and directional vertical coma induction negatively correlated with vertical decentration from the corneal vertex (rLASIK = -0.776, rPRK = -0.665, rSMILE = -0.576) in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE results in a larger EOZ than LASIK and PRK, and absolute decentration remains comparable regardless of surgical reference center, despite horizontal/vertical differences. Surgical planning to ensure adequate EOZ size and centration may reduce induction of HOAs, including spherical aberrations and vertical coma. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):741-750.].

Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method.

PURPOSE: To compare the effective optical zone (EOZ) and centration in eyes with high myopia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) using a novel method. METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 consecutive patients with high myopia scheduled for SMILE or FS-LASIK were enrolled in the study. The EOZ, optical zone decentration, and corneal aberrations were analyzed using Scheimpflug imaging. These values were then analyzed and compared between the two procedures 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean EOZ diameter for SMILE (4.41 ± 0.14 mm) was larger than that for FS-LASIK (4.24 ± 0.28 mm; P = .002), corresponding to reductions of 1.60 ± 0.11 and 1.71 ± 0.21 mm, respectively, compared with the programmed optical zone (POZ) (P = .007). Moreover, the total decentration for SMILE (0.33 ± 0.12 mm) was greater than that for FS-LASIK (0.27 ± 0.15 mm; P = .020). The induction of spherical aberration (SA) was lower with SMILE than with FS-LASIK (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: A larger EOZ and less SA were observed after SMILE than after FS-LASIK in eyes with high myopia. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):736-740.].

The Most Cited Modern Articles in Refractive Surgery (2010-2020).

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive analysis of the most highly cited modern articles in refractive surgery, those published between 2010 and 2020, and compare these results to a list of the most highly cited articles in refractive surgery from all timepoints. METHODS: The Scopus database was searched for articles pertaining to refractive surgery using multiple search terms to identify the top 100 most cited articles in refractive surgery published between 2010 and 2020. Articles were reviewed for relevance and ranked based on total citations accrued. RESULTS: The 100 most cited modern articles in refractive surgery were identified. The article with the most citations by Sekundo et al has garnered nearly 600 citations to date. Almost all articles (88%) included in the top 100 had 200 or more citations. Intraocular lens (34 articles), keratorefractive lenticule extraction (ie, small incision lenticule extraction) (27 articles), and laser in situ keratomileusis (17 articles) were the predominant topics. Aarhus University in Denmark generated the most articles (5), whereas numerous articles originated from multiple countries, including the United States (16), United Kingdom (10), France (8), Spain (8), China (7), and Germany (7). CONCLUSIONS: This list provides a comprehensive assessment of the most cited modern articles in refractive surgery and demonstrates key focuses and trends in the field over the past decade. Intraocular lens and keratorefractive lenticule extraction were the primary topics. There was a broader representation of procedures, topics, authors, and country of origin as compared to prior work. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):784-790.].

Corneal Higher Order Aberrations and Epithelial Remodeling With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Topography-guided and Customized Asphericity Ablation in the Contralateral Eye: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive results, corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), and epithelial remodeling in the preoperative and postoperative period of regular corneas that had topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (Contoura WaveLight; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) and compare them with the contralateral eye that underwent ablation customized by asphericity (Custom-Q WaveLight; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in myopic eyes with or without astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study was conducted. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative epithelial mapping and corneal tomography to assess the epithelial thickness map, HOAs of the corneal anterior surface, visual acuity, and refractive evaluation. RESULTS: This study enrolled 96 normal eyes of 48 patients. Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 97% of patients and gains in corrected distance visual acuity and effectiveness in correcting refractive astigmatism were similar in both techniques. Seventeen sectors of the corneal epithelium map were assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and no significant differences were found between techniques preoperatively and postoperatively (P > .05). HOA root mean square, coma Z3±1, trefoil Z3-3, and tissue consumption exhibited statistically significant between-technique differences (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Contoura and Custom-Q techniques were similar with respect to refractive and visual outcomes after 3 months, as well as in epithelial remodeling. The Contoura provides lower postoperative HOA root mean square, coma Z3±1, and trefoil Z3-3 values, but the techniques showed no differences in the correction of the corneal astigmatic wavefront component and in the spherical aberration after 3 months. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):751-758.].

Comparison of errors in ablation depth calculation after myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with different degrees of myopia: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the difference between the predicted preoperative corneal ablation depth and the measured ablation depth for femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in patients with different degrees of myopia, and to analyze the source of the difference. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (109 eyes) were included in this study. Multiple logistics regression was applied to analyze the sources affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. The difference between the preoperative predicted corneal ablation depth and the 1-day postoperative ablation depth in patients with different degrees of myopia was explored using linear regression. Corneal biomechanical parameters influencing error in ablation depth calculation were examined using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: One hundred and nine eyes were divided into low to moderate myopia (55 eyes, myopia of 6 D or less), high myopia (45 eyes, myopia ranging from 6 D to a maximum of 9 D), and very high myopia group (9 eyes, myopia greater than 9 D) based on preoperative refractive error (spherical equivalent). Postoperative visual outcomes were comparable among the three groups of patients, with no significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). We did find notable disparities in spherical equivalent (SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with different degrees of myopia at 1 day postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that error in ablation depth calculation was an independent risk factor for refractive outcomes one day after surgery (OR = 1.689, 95% CI: 1.366 - 2.089). There was a substantial discrepancy in error in ablation depth calculation at 1 day postoperatively between the three groups. The measured ablation depth of the laser platform was lower than the predicted ablation depth in the low to moderate myopia and very high myopia groups, but the opposite was true in the high myopia group. Pre-operative SE (p < 0.001) and corneal front minimum radius of curvature (Front Rmin) (p = 0.007) obviously influenced the error in ablation depth calculation. CONCLUSIONS: Error in ablation depth calculation values vary significantly between patients with different degrees of myopia and correlate highly with preoperative SE and Front Rmin. At the same time, the available evidence suggests that error in ablation depth calculation is an influential factor in postoperative refractive status, so it is imperative to control error in ablation depth calculation.

Late approach for LASIK flap striae.

A 24-year-old man was referred for postrefractive surgery evaluation. The patient had a history of uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in both eyes 3 months previously. According to the surgeon who originally performed the surgery, on slitlamp examination, only microstriae in the left eye was detected on postoperative day 1 and a more conservative follow-up approach was adopted without further immediate intervention. The patient returned only 3 months after surgery, complaining of low vision in the left eye that, according to the patient, had been present since postoperative week 2. The patient was then referred for examination and surgical procedure with a diagnosis of significant postoperative striae. The slitlamp examination revealed a LASIK flap with striae, epithelial filling, and a wrinkled appearance (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202312000-00017/figure1/v/2023-11-20T151558Z/r/image-tiff). There were no signs of infection or inflammation. Originally, the LASIK flap was programmed to be 110 µm. Preoperative manifest refraction in the right eye was -5.25 (20/20) and in the left eye was -5.25 (20/20). Assuming it is a case of late-approach LASIK flap striae, how would you proceed? Would you try to hydrate and lift the flap and just reposition it? Would you avoid lifting and associate phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with excimer laser on top of the flap? Would you consider topo-guided surgery with regularization of the visual axis or even amputation of the flap?

Non-invasive assessment of the tear film after LASIK.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the assessment of the ocular surface using classic methods with the newly developed keratoscopy-based MYAH (Topcon EU, Visia Imaging, Japan) device after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 80 eyes of 40 patients. Tear film and ocular surface evaluation were performed at baseline, postoperative week 1, and month 1. Measurements obtained using the Schirmer I test and invasive tear-film breakup time (I-TBT) were compared with non-invasive evaluation of the tear break-up time (NI-TBT), tear meniscus height (TMH) and blink analysis obtained using the MYAH device. Findings were correlated with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire in all subjects. RESULTS: The study included 80 eyes of 40 consecutive patients (21 males and 19 females) with a mean age of 26.6 ± 5.9 years (18-40 years) and a mean spherical equivalent value of -3.64 D (-9.63 to -0.25 D). There was a significant decrease in Schirmer I test (19.21 ± 8.4 vs. 16.61 ± 9.1 vs. 14.69 ± 9.86, p= 0.02, respectively) and I-TBT values (8.59 ± 3.4 vs. 7.4 ± 3.25 vs. 6.17 ± 3.01, p=0.03 respectively). OSDI values showed a significant increase after LASIK (11.56 ± 6.3 vs. 17.24 ± 7.5 vs. 14.71 ± 9.6, p=0.03, respectively). 5% level NI-TBT was significantly lower at 1 week 6.75 and 1 month 7.45 than baseline 13.2 at follow-up (p=0.037). Ocular protection index (6.6 vs. 2.3 vs. 2.6, p=0.009, respectively) and blink/minutes (18 vs. 17 vs. 15, p=0.002, respectively) values showed a statistically significant decrease. Our data detected a weak correlation between I-TBT and noninvasive first TBT, 5% level TBT parameters at month 1 follow-up. This study also found no correlation between contact lens use, older age, female gender, and pre-operative refractive error with the noninvasive MYAH dry eye parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the ability of the new keratoscopy-based MYAH device to detect changes in the short term after LASIK surgery.

Intraocular Pressure Changes in Myopic Patients Undergoing Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in intraocular pressure measurements between Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in myopic patients undergoing laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (AFIO), National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, between September 2020 and 2021. METHODOLOGY: Myopic patients undergoing LASIK and PRK during the study period were selected. Baseline examinations and postoperative follow-ups were carried out to measure intraocular pressure at 1, 3, and 6 months after LASIK or PRK, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and Ocular Response Analyzer, corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc). RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen eyes underwent myopic refractive surgery, LASIK (n = 60) or PRK (n = 53). Mean age of patients was 23.6 ± 4.11 years in the PRK group and 24.4 ± 5.94 years in LASIK group. For the PKR group, the GAT IOP value increased at 1-month (p <0.001), decreased at 3-month (p <0.001) and further decreased at 6-month (p <0.001) follow-up postoperatively. In the LASIK group, the GAT IOP value decreased at all time points (p <0.001). In both groups, the mean ORA IOPcc value increased at 1 month (p <0.001), decreased at 3-month (p <0.001) and further decreased at 6-month (p <0.001) follow-up postoperatively. The IOP mean values were generally found to be higher when measured using ORA as compared with GAT. CONCLUSION: Corneal refractive surgery markedly decreased IOP. This decrease in IOP was observed more after LASIK than after PRK. ORA was less likely to underestimate the intraocular pressure than GAT. KEY WORDS: Myopia, Laser in-situ keratomileusis, Photorefractive keratectomy, Tonometery ocular, Intraocular pressure.

Impact of corrected refractive power on the corneal denervation and ocular surface in small-incision lenticule extraction and LASIK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of corrected refractive power on the corneal denervation and ocular surface in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: 88 eyes undergoing SMILE or LASIK were divided into low-moderate (manifest refractive spherical equivalent [MRSE] <-6.0 diopters [D]) and high myopic (MRSE ≥-6.0 D) groups. In vivo confocal microscopy and clinical assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In SMILE, high myopic treatment presented with significantly greater reduction in the corneal nerve fiber area (CNFA) and nerve fiber fractal dimension (CFracDim) compared with low-moderate myopic treatment (both P < .05). There was a significant and negative correlation between the corrected MRSE and the reduction in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length, CNFA, and CFracDim after SMILE (r = -0.38 to -0.66, all P < .05). In LASIK, a significant correlation between the MRSE and the changes in CNBD, corneal nerve fiber total branch density, CNFA (r = -0.37 to -0.41), and corneal nerve fiber width (r = 0.43) was observed (all P < .05). Compared with SMILE, LASIK had greater reduction in CNBD and CNFA for every diopter increase in the corrected MRSE. High myopic SMILE, compared with low-moderate myopic SMILE, resulted in significantly lower tear break-up time at 1 and 6 months (both P < .05). The changes in CNFA and CFracDim were significantly associated with Schirmer test values (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative corneal denervation was related to corrected refractive power in both SMILE and LASIK. With the same refractive correction, LASIK led to more prominent corneal denervation.

Post-laser refractive surgery keratitis: A concise narrative review.

Laser refractive surgery (LRS) is a specialized surgical discipline within ophthalmology that focuses on vision correction via laser techniques. LRS requires a high rate of accuracy and exactitude to improve the visual outcome and minimize complications, which may lead to delayed visual recovery. Keratitis, either infectious or noninfectious, is a post-LRS complication that requires early diagnosis and proper interventional measures. In this narrative review, we summarize different aspects of keratitis following LRS. This literature review aims to provide a thorough understanding of the causes of post-LRS infectious keratitis and its appropriate management for successful outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of TransPRK and FS-LASIK refractive procedures on patients with astigmatism and amblyopia.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK) with femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for the correction of astigmatism on amblyopic eyes. Methods: The design was a retrospective interventional study on 37 eyes with hyperopic or mixed astigmatism and refractive amblyopia, which underwent transPRK or FS-LASIK. The patients were distributed into 2 groups according to the technique used. Data was collected from patient files and comparison between groups was performed. The main outcomes measured were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent (SEQ), efficiency and safety indexes. Results: In the transPRK group, SEQ improved significantly after 1 month, from 2.08 ± 2.02D (p<0.01) to 0.125 ± 0.86D and at the 12 month visit to -0.04 ± 0.62D (p>0.05), sphere improved from 4.03 ± 1.44D preoperatively to 0.67 ± 0.9D at 1 month (p<0.05) and further to 0.44 ± 0.71 at 12 months (p<0.05). CDVA improved from 0.194 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.115 ± 0.1 logMAR at the 1-year visit. Safety index after 1 month was 1.09 ± 0.2 and 1.12 ± 0.35 at the 1-year visit. Efficiency index was 0.95 ± 0.22 at 1 month and 1.03 ± 0.34 after 1 year. In FS-LASIK group, SEQ improved after 1 month, from 2.28 ± 3.04 to -0.79 ± 0.73D (p<0.01), and further to -0.49 ± 0.79 (p>0.05) at the 12 month visit, sphere improved from 4.11 ± 2.35D preoperatively to -0.42 ± 0.66D at 1 month (p<0.05) and further to -0.08 ± 0.75D at 12 months (p<0.05). CDVA also improved from 0.191 ± 0.1 logMAR to 0.140 ± 0.1 logMAR at 1 year. Safety index after 1 month was 1.1 ± 0.2 and 1.16 ± 0.21 at the 1-year visit. Efficiency index was 0.98 ± 0.27 at 1 month and 1.06 ± 0.23 after 1 year. Conclusion: Both procedures were safe and efficient in improving visual acuity for patients with mixed and hyperopic astigmatism and refractive amblyopia. Abbreviations: transPRK = transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, FS-LASIK = femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis, logMAR = logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, BCVA = best corrected distance visual acuity, CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity.

Self-limited corneal ectasia in a post-LASIK eye after cataract surgery: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: To present a case with a history of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) developing central conic protrusion after phacoemulsification cataract surgery, which spontaneously resolved 5 months postoperatively. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 55-year-old female who underwent myopic LASIK surgery 10 years ago presented to the clinic with bilateral cataracts and without ectasia. Following phacoemulsification cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation in the right eye, the patient experienced a significant increase in spherical equivalent and corneal astigmatism. DIAGNOSES: Based on a central conic protrusion on topography examination, surgically-induced corneal ectasia was diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS: Topical lubricants, corticosteroids, and serial follow-up with corneal topography. OUTCOMES: The corneal protrusion gradually resolved over a period of 5 months. LESSONS: For post-LASIK patient who developed corneal protrusion following uneventful cataract surgery with a clear corneal incision, the clear corneal wound may have disrupted the biomechanical stability of the post-LASIK eye, compromising the peripheral stromal integrity. Additionally, postoperative inflammation could have contributed to corneal ectasia. Smaller clear corneal wounds or scleral tunnel entry during cataract surgery in post-LASIK eyes should be considered. Monitoring wound healing and using topical steroids can aid in achieving satisfactory outcomes and reducing the potential vision-threatening complications associated with corneal ectasia.

Quality of life following LASIK surgery at a tertiary center in North India.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Laser-assisted in situ keratomileuses (LASIK) refractive surgery is a cutting-edge and developing area of ophthalmology. Reshaping the cornea during refractive surgery helps patients become less dependent on glasses or contact lenses. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the visual outcome, quality of life, and patient satisfaction following LASIK surgery at a tertiary care center in North India using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life (NEIRQL-42) questionnaire. METHODS: NEI-RQL, a 42-item measure with 13 subscales. The questionnaire was administered to a sample size of 71 patients who underwent LASIK Surgery at a tertiary center in North India. Data were collected pre- and post-surgery (1,3,6 month post-LASIK) for myopic or hyperopic refractive error. Statistical analysis was done using the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: In myopic patients, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.19 ± 2.28D in the right eye and -4.26 ± 2.28D in the left eye and post-op SE -0.06±0.29 (p=0.00). The largest improvements (>25 points) on the 0 to 100 possible score range, were seen in activity limitations, dependence on correction, appearance, and satisfaction with correction subscales. The subscale glare showed a statistically significant difference (worsening) whereas a non-significant change (P> 0.05) was recorded only in the sub-optimal correction sub-scale. CONCLUSIONS: The NEIRQL-42 is a responsive tool to evaluate vision-related changes in quality of life after LASIK surgery in the Indian population. The best surgical expectancy and QoL can be expected at 6 months following surgery.

Epithelial Inoculation After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Case Report.

Epithelial ingrowth is a rare condition that is generally seen after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and has been reported in the literature in a small number of cases after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. "Epithelial inoculation" should also be considered in patients presenting with decreased vision and an appearance similar to epithelial ingrowth in the early period after SMILE surgery. A 23-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a request for refractive surgery. Her manifest refractions were -7.50 -1.00 x 180° in the right eye and -7.25 -1.00 x 150° in the left eye, and best corrected distance visual acuity was 10/10 in both eyes. The SMILE procedure was performed with the Visumax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Slit-lamp examination at postoperative 1 week revealed a small grayish-white intrastromal opacity resembling epithelial ingrowth in the central optic axis of the right eye. Irrigation of the interface was performed with balanced salt solution using an irrigation cannula and the epithelial cluster was removed. The patient remained clinically stable 6 months after surgery and has experienced no recurrence. When epithelial inoculation is observed early after SMILE surgery, immediate irrigation of the interface appears to be an effective and safe treatment.

Management of traumatic displacement of LASIK flap.

Background: Although flap-based laser refractive surgeries are being extensively performed worldwide, complications due to the flap may occur years after the procedure leading to severe vision-threatening complications. Purpose: To describe the management of a case of traumatic displacement of a LASIK flap performed 8 years earlier. Synopsis: A 42-year-old male presented to us with complaints of decreased vision in his left eye following trauma with a toy gun sustained a day earlier. His best-corrected visual acuity was Counting fingers @ 2 m, and a slit-lamp evaluation revealed a LASIK flap with its temporal edge folded inwards. Flap repositioning was planned. The final surgical plan was interface irrigation with mechanical debridement, alcohol epitheliectomy, fibrin glue application, and bandage contact lens. His uncorrected visual acuity improved to 6/6, N6 at 5 weeks postoperatively, which was maintained at 8 months postoperatively along with a clear interface. Highlights: Traumatic displacement of LASIK flap years after the procedure is a known complication. However, simple flap repositioning may lead to various complications like epithelial ingrowth, DLK, astigmatism, etc., This video describes how to achieve anatomical and visual rehabilitation in such eyes without any long-term complications. Video link: https://youtu.be/QtWG9hEMsXM.

Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures.

BACKGROUND: As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients. RESULTS: The Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411). CONCLUSION: The study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes.

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (PGroup = 0.373). At 1 year postoperatively, the CCT reduction was overestimated by 17.85 ± 5.36 µm in the SMILE group, underestimated by 4.31 ± 7.08 µm in the FS-LASIK group, and underestimated by 7.60 ± 8.28 µm in the LASEK group (PGroup < 0.001, PTime < 0.001). In the FS-LASIK group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction was not related to the predicted CCT reduction (P = 0.095). The laser platform may overestimate the CCT reduction for SMILE and underestimate it for FS-LASIK and LASEK. FS-LASIK has a much higher level of accuracy in CCT reduction, which is not influenced by refractive correction.