Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Factors that predict the quality of bowel preparation in older adults are unclear, and current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in older patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched from their inception to February 2023. Cohort and cross-sectional studies exploring the risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation were included in this systematic review. Odds ratio (OR) values from individual studies were pooled using fixed-effects and random-effects models. In addition, a sensitivity analysis and assessment of publication bias were performed. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included six studies (n = 1553) on previous abdominal surgery, six studies (n = 1494) on constipation, seven studies (n = 1505) on diabetes, eight studies (n = 2093) on non-compliance with the diet regimen, seven studies (n = 1350) on incomplete intake of laxative, and nine studies (n = 2163) on inadequate exercise during preparation. The pooled analysis showed that history of abdominal surgery (OR = 2.72; 95 % confidence interval, CI: 2.07 to 3.56), constipation (OR = 3.56, 95 % CI: 2.41 to 5.25), diabetes (OR = 2.54, 95 % CI: 1.81 to 3.57), non-compliance with the diet regimen (OR = 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.96 to 3.21), incomplete intake of laxative (OR = 2.43, 95 % CI: 1.60 to 3.67), and inadequate exercise during preparation (OR = 3.13, 95 % CI: 2.39 to 4.11) were independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in older patients undergoing colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Three comorbid factors and three behavioral factors were significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation in older adults. This meta-analysis provides valuable information for developing predictive models of poor bowel preparation.

Post-colonoscopy rectal cancer in Swedish patients with Crohn's disease 2001-2015: a population-based case review study.

OBJECTIVE: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is a key quality indicator of colonoscopy, and PCCRC rates are high in the IBD population. Rectal cancer, an important risk factor for PCCRC among patients with Crohn's disease (CD), has not previously been examined. METHODS: Swedish adult patients with CD who underwent a colonoscopy within 36 months before a rectal cancer diagnosis between 2001 and 2015 were identified through the National Patient and Cancer registers. Their medical records were reviewed and a root-cause analysis and a sub-categorization according to the World Endoscopic Organization (WEO) were performed. RESULTS: Of 24 patients with CD and PCCRC in the rectum, 79% were men and the median age was 50 (IQR 45-59) years. The median disease duration was 21.5 (IQR 19-30) years. The cancer was located in the distal 5 cm of the rectum in 63% of the cases. Retroversion in the rectum was reported in only one case. The most common plausible explanation for PCCRC was 'possible missed lesion, prior examination adequate' (63%); when adding retroversion in the rectum, instead 77% of examinations were considered negative but deemed as inadequate. The most common PCCRC sub-category was non-interval type C (54%) and B (37%). Among those with type C, 38% should have been included in surveillance according to present guidelines. CONCLUSION: Better adherence to surveillance guidelines and more meticulous follow-up is warranted. The importance of performing rectal palpation and retroversion in the rectum is underscored and we suggest that this is included in the WEO algorithm.

[Prevention of bleeding in polypectomy]. / Profilaktika krovotecheniya pri udalenii obrazovanii slizistoi obolochki polykh organov putem primeneniya endoskopicheskoi ligiruyushchei petli.

OBJECTIVE: To improve early treatment outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal polyps using a new device designed for prevention of bleeding during endoscopic minimally invasive polypectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective trial included 35 patients with 36 colonic polyps (stalk diameter >5 mm). Polyp ligation procedure was performed using a novel device providing delivery and tightening the knot before polypectomy. RESULTS: All polyps were successfully removed without any technical difficulties and exposed to histological examination. Mean age of patients was 64 years (52-81), mean dimension of polyps - 15.6 mm (10-40), mean thickness of stalk - 8 mm (5-12). There were no intraoperative and early postoperative complications. All patients were discharged after 2 postoperative days. CONCLUSION: The proposed method for prevention of bleeding during polypectomy is simple, effective and safe for clinical practice.

Time to Endoscopy or Colonoscopy Among Adults Younger Than 50 Years With Iron-Deficiency Anemia and/or Hematochezia in the VHA.

Importance: To date, the diagnostic test completion rate and the time to diagnostic endoscopy or colonoscopy among adults with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) and/or hematochezia have not been well characterized. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic test completion rate and the time to diagnostic testing among veterans younger than 50 years with IDA and/or hematochezia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted within the Veterans Health Administration between October 1, 1999, and December 31, 2019, among US veterans aged 18 to 49 years from 2 separate cohorts: those with a diagnosis of IDA (n = 59 169) and those with a diagnosis of hematochezia (n = 189 185). Statistical analysis was conducted from August 2021 to August 2023. Exposures: Diagnostic testing factors included age, sex, race and ethnicity, Veterans Health Administration geographic region, and hemoglobin test value (IDA cohort only). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes of diagnostic testing were (1) bidirectional endoscopy after diagnosis of IDA and (2) colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy after diagnosis of hematochezia. The association between diagnostic testing factors and diagnostic test completion was examined using Poisson models. Results: There were 59 169 veterans with a diagnosis of IDA (mean [SD] age, 40.7 [7.1] years; 30 502 men [51.6%]), 189 185 veterans with a diagnosis of hematochezia (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [7.6] years; 163 690 men [86.5%]), and 2287 veterans with IDA and hematochezia (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [6.9] years; 1856 men [81.2%]). The cumulative 2-year diagnostic workup completion rate was 22% (95% CI, 22%-22%) among veterans with IDA and 40% (95% CI, 40%-40%) among veterans with hematochezia. Veterans with IDA were mostly aged 40 to 49 years (37 719 [63.7%]) and disproportionately Black (24 480 [41.4%]). Women with IDA (rate ratio [RR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.40-0.43) had a lower likelihood of diagnostic test completion compared with men with IDA. Black (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62-0.68) and Hispanic (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94) veterans with IDA were less likely to receive diagnostic testing compared with White veterans with IDA. Veterans with hematochezia were mostly White (105 341 [55.7%]). Among veterans with hematochezia, those aged 30 to 49 years were more likely to receive diagnostic testing than adults younger than 30 years of age (age 30-39 years: RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.12-1.18; age 40-49 years: RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.33-1.40). Hispanic veterans with hematochezia were less likely to receive diagnostic testing compared with White veterans with hematochezia (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: In the cohorts of veterans younger than 50 years with IDA and/or hematochezia, the diagnostic test completion rate was low. Follow-up was less likely among female, Black, and Hispanic veterans with IDA and Hispanic veterans with hematochezia. Optimizing timely follow-up across social and demographic groups may contribute to improving colorectal cancer outcomes and mitigate disparities.

[Value of fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening].

Screening and early diagnosis and treatment have been proven effective in reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy combined with pathological examination is the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening. However, due to the invasiveness, high cost and the need for professional endoscopists of colonoscopy, it is not feasible to directly use this method for mass population screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is one of the screening techniques recommended by authoritative international guidelines for colorectal cancer screening, and has been widely used in population-based colorectal cancer screening programs in countries around the world. This paper elaborates on the value of FIT in colorectal cancer screening from different aspects, such as the technical principles, the screening efficiency, the screening strategies, and the population effects and benefits. Additionally, it describes the current situation of colorectal cancer screening in China and summarizes the challenges faced in colorectal cancer screening in order to optimize the FIT-based colorectal cancer screening strategies in the population and provide theoretical reference for effective colorectal cancer screening.

[Usefulness and safety of observing anorectal lesions by colon capsule endoscopy].

We investigated the findings of rectoanal lesions in 190 patients who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) at our hospital. Internal hemorrhoids were observed in 70 (36.8%) patients and rectal polyps in 19 (10%) patients. When conventional endoscopy (colonoscopy and double balloon endoscopy) was considered the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of rectal polyps were 75% and 93.4%, respectively, and those of internal hemorrhoids were 88.9% and 92.7%, respectively. The prevalence of constipation was significantly higher in the false-negative group for internal hemorrhoids, and the colonic transit time was significantly shorter in the false-negative and false-positive groups for rectal polyps. No adverse events occurred in any of the patients. CCE might be a useful and safe examination method for rectoanal lesions.

Coloscopy, or colonoscopy?

In current medical and lay communication practice, the terms coloscopy and colonoscopy appear in parallel, and their usage is quite varied. The conclusion of the article is neither the form coloscopy nor the form colonoscopy is to be rejected. The final form depends on how the term got into Czech medical terminology - whether directly from Greek or via French (coloscopy) or through English (colonoscopy). As far as the professional-medical discourse is concerned, the article supports those opinions that recommend the unification of the first variant for professional medical practice, i.e. term coloscopy as a direct adaptation of the Greek word. However, regarding common practice in relation to patients, the fact that the term colonoscopy is more frequent and more familiar to users cannot be neglected; therefore, it cannot be rejected.

Screening and Colonoscopy Quality Measures: Ethnic Disparities and Impact on Patients' Outcome.

Background: Recent reports have confirmed the improving trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and outcomes. Still, disparities in incidence and mortality in CRC continue to persist between major ethnic groups despite the provision of widespread screening and improved care. We aimed to outline, from an endoscopic point of view, ethnic disparities in major endoscopic measures concerned with CRC screening and detection and track their impact on patients' outcomes. Methods: We reviewed electronic reports of patients referred for colonoscopy procedures over 20 years. We compared demographic, clinical, and endoscopic findings between major ethnic population groups in Israel. In addition, trends of screening utilization, bowel preparation, and polyp detection rates were tracked, and the incidence of CRC diagnosis was followed. Results: A total of 51307 patients had undergone colonoscopies, of whom 16% were Arabs, and 84% were Jewish. The procedures performed for CRC screening throughout the study period were significantly lower in Arabs (5% vs. 13.1%; P < 0.0001). In parallel, for most of the follow-up period, the Arab patients had higher rates of inadequate bowel preparation (overall: 19.9% vs. 12%; P < 0.001) and a lower polyp detection rate (16.7% vs. 22.5%; P < 0.0001). Expectedly, the incidence of CRC has steadily decreased in the Jewish group, while an adverse pattern of increasing incidence was documented in the Arab patient during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Characterized by lower screening utilization and poor bowel preparation, the incidence of CRC development in Arab patients is increasing, while improving trends of CRC were observed in their Jewish counterparts.

Inequities in colonoscopy access: a retrospective audit of accepted referrals in Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau.

AIM: Maori are more likely to have colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed in the emergency setting.[[1]] CRC patients diagnosed in the emergency setting have a higher stage, increased surgical complications and worse survival than those diagnosed elsewhere.[[2]] Access to colonoscopy is crucial to diagnosing CRC prior to an emergency presentation. This study aims to assess inequities in access to symptomatic and surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all accepted referrals for symptomatic and surveillance colonoscopies made in Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau in 2018 (n=7,184) with analysis by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 751 Maori patients, 33.4% were removed off the waiting list and therefore did not have their colonoscopy performed, compared to 24.1% of the 4,047 NZ European patients. Maori patients were significantly more likely to be removed off the waiting list than NZ European patients with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.02). Pasifika patients were significantly more likely to be removed off the waiting list than NZ European patients with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.30 (95% CI 1.92-2.75). CONCLUSIONS: Maori have significantly less access to colonoscopies than NZ Europeans. We suggest improvements to referral systems locally and nationally to facilitate equitable access.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Clinical Management Approaches.

Inflammatory bowel disease is not uncommon among kidney transplant recipients. In transplant patients with chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain, de novo inflammatory bowel disease can be considered among differential diagnoses, after exclusion of infectious causes and drug-induced diarrhea. Inflammatory bowel disease, in the cnnnontext of organ transplant, is associated with a higherrisk of morbidity, increased rate of hospitalization, and higher mortality.Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, before and after transplant, among a gastroenterologist specialized in inflammatory bowel disease, a gastrointestinal surgeon, and a transplant clinician is essential, given the higher clinical complexity for this subgroup of patients. Limited data are available on management of inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients, although the concurrent use of immunosuppressive therapy can mitigate flare-ups but with increased infection risks. Colorectal cancer can be a serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease; hence, patient compliance with regular colonoscopy surveillance programs is crucial. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are undergoing kidney transplant have a shorter overall survival rate compared with matched control groups. However, inferences based on studies involving inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients are blighted by small sample sizes,thus making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions. Our review was undertaken to comprehensively report the clinical approaches to kidney transplant recipients with inflammatory bowel disease, describing their clinical course, outcomes, and management plan.

Clinical performance study of a fecal bacterial signature test for colorectal cancer screening.

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the most widely used test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. RAID-CRC Screen is a new non-invasive test based on fecal bacterial markers, developed to complement FIT by increasing its specificity. The test was previously clinically evaluated in FIT-positive patients (>20 µg of hemoglobin/g of feces, "FIT20"), in which it reduced the proportion of false positive results by 16.3% while maintaining most of FIT20's sensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of a CRC screening program using RAID-CRC Screen in addition to FIT20 as a triage test in a European screening population undergoing screening colonoscopy with a CRC screening program with FIT20 alone in the same cohort. A cohort of 2481 subjects aged > 55 years from the German screening colonoscopy program was included. The colonoscopy findings were used as the gold standard in calculating the diagnostic capacity of the tests and included 15 CRC and 257 advanced neoplasia cases. RAID-CRC Screen added to FIT20 provided the same sensitivity as FIT20 alone (66.7%) in detecting CRC and a significantly higher specificity (97.0% vs. 96.1%, p<0.0001). The positive predictive value was 11.9% when using RAID-CRC Screen and 9.5% with FIT20 alone, and the negative predictive value was 99.8% in the two scenarios. For advanced neoplasia detection, the use of RAID-CRC Screen yielded significantly lower sensitivity than with FIT20 alone (17.5% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.0009), and the overall specificity was significantly higher when using RAID-CRC Screen compared with FIT20 alone (98.2% vs. 97.8%, p = 0.0039). Our findings confirm the results obtained in previous clinical studies in a CRC screening setting, showing the potential of RAID-CRC Screen to increase the overall specificity of FIT-based screening.

Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of telephone instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Online English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were screened for randomized controlled trials on telephone instructions regarding bowel preparation for colonoscopy from inception to April 15, 2022. After data extraction, the Review Manager software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 3,836 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.30, P < 0.01). The pooled mean difference (MD) for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score was 1.32 (95% CI: 0.15-2.49, P < 0.05), and that for the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale score was -1.93 (95% CI: -2.35 to -1.51, P < 0.01). The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in the telephone group than in the control group (RR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was noted in the adenoma detection rate between the groups (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.97-1.94, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Telephone instructions for patients undergoing colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation and increased polyp detection rate.

Virtual reality interventions to reduce psychological distress during colonoscopy: a rapid review.

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy can cause psychological distress in patients, consequently discouraging patients from undergoing an unpleasant procedure or reducing compliance with follow-up examinations. This rapid review aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) interventions during colonoscopy on patients' perceived psychological distress and procedure satisfaction. AREAS COVERED: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest/All Databases, and Cochrane Library databases on 1 December 2022, with a date limiter of 2002-2022 for articles that investigated the effect and feasibility of any type of immersive VR-based intervention on patients' pain, anxiety, discomfort, and procedure satisfaction immediately before, during, and/or post-procedure of colonoscopy. EXPERT OPINION: Initially, 118 articles were identified, of which seven were eligible and included in this rapid review. Our findings demonstrate that VR interventions during colonoscopy were feasible, significantly reduced participant pain and anxiety, and significantly increased participant satisfaction with the procedure. VR interventions appear to be an effective alternative for patients who prefer to avoid analgetic medications or as an adjunct to routine sedation during colonoscopy. Directions of research design should focus on an optimized blinding process, using the high-end technology of 3-dimensional devices, considering an audiovisual distracting intervention, and designing multicenter and high-quality Randomized Controlled Trials.

Effect of Reinforced Video by WeChat on Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of reinforced educational video through smartphone WeChat on adenoma detection rate (ADR). STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Xiantao First People's Hospital affiliated to Yangtze University, Hubei, China, from May 2020 to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: All participants received written instructions regarding bowel preparation and diet before colonoscopy. After randomisation, patients in video group received educational videos through WeChat, two days before the colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was ADR. The secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR), quality of bowel preparation, adverse events, and satisfaction with preparation. RESULTS: Five-hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the study (284 in video group and 280 in non-video group). ADR was similar in both groups without significant difference (26.4% vs. 23.2%, p=0.38). PDR was not different among the two groups (31.7% vs. 30.4%). The total cleansing score and percentage of adequate bowel preparation in the video group were higher compared with non-video group (p<0.05). Moreover, patient satisfaction was also higher in video group (p=0.048), and the incidence of adverse events in both groups was similar. CONCLUSION: The availability of a supplementary educational video before colonoscopy was insufficient to improve ADR and PDR, but offered benefits on bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. KEY WORDS: Video, Adenoma detection rate, Bowel preparation, Colonoscopy.

Outcomes and appropriateness of colonoscopy referrals at King Khalid University Hospital, Saudi Arabia: An opportunity to expand the colonoscopy screening.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the colonoscopy referrals in an open-access system and determine the outcome and factors associated with appropriate referral. METHODS: A retrospective study of colonoscopy referrals used patients' medical records at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during 2020-2022. Fisher's exact or Pearson's Chi-squared test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Out of 365 patients, 95.1% were referred from family medicine clinics with a mean age of 56.2±15.7 years. Men account for 53.2% of patients. The most common symptoms were change in bowel habits (35.6%), abdominal pain (30.4%), and anemia (20.1%). A family history of colorectal cancer was positive in 12.1%, while a personal history was positive in 4.4%. Most referrals (86.0%) were appropriate based on the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines. However, approximately 89.1% of patients aged ≥45 years had neoplasia and 40.0% had inflammatory bowel disease (p=0.019). The rank of the physicians (p=0.558) or the gender of the patients (p=0.665) did not influence the appropriateness. The inappropriate referrals were lower in patients with neoplasia (1.6%) than in patients with other lesions (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The colonoscopy referrals were appropriate. The incidence of neoplasia was higher among those aged ≥45. Low inappropriate referrals and a high neoplasia detection were found based on ASGE guidelines. Future research should involve prospective multicenter referrals from family physicians outside hospitals and investigate patients' hesitancy to proceed with colonoscopy and cost-effectiveness.

Provider- and System-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy and Multi-Target Stool DNA for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural/Remote Alaska Native Communities.

The Alaska Tribal Health System is working to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native people, who experience the highest CRC rates in the world. This study examined CRC screening provider- and system-level barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare providers serving Alaska Native people in rural/remote communities. A total of 28 provider (physicians, advanced practice, and Community Health Aides/Practitioners) interviews were held from 1 February to 30 November 2021. Colonoscopy provider-level barrier themes included time, competing priorities, and staffing, while system-level barriers included travel costs, weather, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) barrier themes included test viability and unfamiliarity, and previous stool tests experiences. For both tests, limited medical record reminders was a major barrier. Facilitator themes for both tests included community outreach, cultural competency and patient navigation, and clinic/system improvements. In-depth interviews with tribal health providers showed that adding mt-sDNA testing may help address system-level colonoscopy barriers such as waitlists and travel costs, but other barriers remain. Further research is needed into patient barriers and facilitators, as well as the effectiveness of integrating mt-sDNA into a geographically dispersed tribal health system to reduce cancer disparities and build equity in CRC prevention among Alaska Native people.

Recent advances in devices and technologies that might prove revolutionary for colonoscopy procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), a quality indicator for colonoscopy, has gained prominence as it is inversely related to CRC incidence and mortality. As such, recent efforts have focused on developing novel colonoscopy devices and technologies to improve ADR. AREAS COVERED: The main objective of this paper is to provide an overview of advancements in the fields of colonoscopy mechanical attachments, artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy, and colonoscopy optical enhancements with respect to ADR. We accomplished this by performing a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases from inception to September 2023. This review is intended to be an introduction to colonoscopy devices and technologies. EXPERT OPINION: Numerous mechanical attachments and optical enhancements have been developed that have the potential to improve ADR and AI has gone from being an inaccessible concept to a feasible means for improving ADR. While these advances are exciting and portend a change in what will be considered standard colonoscopy, they continue to require refinement. Future studies should focus on combining modalities to further improve ADR and exploring the use of these technologies in other facets of colonoscopy.