RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In an effort to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), governments restricted outdoor activities and imposed lockdown quarantine. This change in lifestyle probably affected individuals' eating habits and physical activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal antenatal weight gain, neonatal macrosomia, and other maternal and neonatal outcomes of women delivering at an academic medical center in Israel. METHOD: A retrospective, two-period cohort study conducted at a university teaching medical center in Afula, Israel. The study period was between April and September 2020. This period signifies worsening in pandemic situations, during which citizens experienced strict prolonged lockdown measures. The parallel unexposed period (control period) was between April and September 2019. Singleton pregnancies delivered at >24 weeks were eligible. Primary outcome was incidence of macrosomia. Secondary outcomes included gestational weight gain, body mass index (BMI) at delivery, rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and neonatal outcomes reflecting neonatal birth weight and condition at delivery. RESULTS: A total of 4,765 women were included, 2,442 in the study group and 2,323 in the control group. The incidence of macrosomia was significantly higher in 2020 (6.2%) than in 2019 (4.9%), (p = .048; OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.002- 1.65). Women gained significantly more weight (median 1 kg more), weighed more at delivery (median 1 kg), and had higher BMI at delivery in 2020 compared with those in 2019 (p < .01). The incidence of GDM was 9.5% and 8.5% in the study and control groups respectively (p = .26; OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.92-1.37). Greater percentage of women did not perform the glucose challenge test in 2020 (9.9%) compared with those in 2019 (7.5%) (p = .003, OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.11-1.67). The incidence of any hypertension related to pregnancy was significantly higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (5.8% vs 4.4% respectively, (p = .042; OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.02-1.71). The proportion of women who smoked during pregnancy was also significantly higher in 2020 than in 2019 (5.1% vs 3.7%, respectively, p = .02; OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-1.86). Delivery mode did not differ, while the incidence of PPH was significantly higher in 2020 than in 2019 (5.6% vs 3.4%, respectively, p = .001; OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.25-2.19). Neonatal condition at delivery was comparable. CONCLUSION: COVID-19-related lockdown was associated with the increased rate of macrosomic infants. This indirect effect of the pandemic is probably related to poorer maternal antenatal metabolic health status. Long-term consequences should be further examined.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Gestacional , Ganho de Peso na Gestação , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Israel , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Aumento de Peso , Peso ao Nascer , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Resultado da GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the combined effect of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and maximum level of maternal serum total bile acid (TBA) on the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). METHODS: This was an observational study with 724 women with ICP. Perinatal outcomes were compared by the presence of GDM. Logistic regression was used to assess the independent and multiplicative interactions of GDM and maximum maternal serum TBA on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Additive interactions were calculated using an Excel sheet developed by Andersson to calculate relative excess risks. RESULTS: The incidence of GDM in patients with ICP was 21.55%. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy weight, parity, and gravidity were positively correlated with GDM. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and fetal distress rates were higher in the GDM vs. non-GDM group. There were no significant differences in biochemical outcomes (i.e., Triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein (LDL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bile acid (TBA)) between the two groups. In terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes, GDM was only associated with maximum TBA concentration for cesarean section. No additive or pairwise interactions were detected between GDM and maximum TBA concentration and HDP, PPH, preterm delivery, LGA, SGA, and cesarean section. CONCLUSION: GDM independently contributes to adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with ICP. However, the combined effects of GDM and maximum TBA concentration on adverse pregnancy outcomes do not appear to be multiplicative or additive.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Feminino , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Cesárea , Ácidos e Sais BiliaresRESUMO
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of suffering diverse adverse pregnancy outcomes, threating maternal and child health seriously, with an increasing incidence rate year by year. However, the exact cause of GDM is still unknown. Prospective cohort studies obtain data through follow-up, which is helpful to clarify the causal relationship, so as to draw more accurate and reliable conclusions. In recent years, numerous prospective cohort studies on the GDM have emerged. This article elaborates along the occurrence and development process of GDM, in order to provide useful reference for the establishment of relevant high-quality prospective cohort studies in China.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado da Gravidez , Incidência , China/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy in acromegaly is uncommon and still in debate for fear of tumor progression or potential threat to both mother and fetus's health. Besides, the data for pregnancy complications in uncontrolled acromegaly is limited. Thus, the objective of this study was to summarize pregnancy safety and disease courses after pregnancy in acromegalic patients and review their clinical characteristics based on disease activity in the literature. METHODS: An evaluation of eight acromegalic women from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) with 11 pregnancies was conducted. We also summarized a literature review of 82 disease-active pregnancies and 63 disease-controlled pregnancies with acromegaly. A second analysis was conducted to compare pregnancy courses and outcomes in different disease activities. RESULTS: Before pregnancy, all patients had macroadenomas and underwent pituitary surgery. Pregnancy occurred at a median of 6 years (4-10) after the diagnosis of acromegaly. Assisted reproductive therapy was needed in 42.9% of participants. No cases had a premature birth or congenital malformations. Biochemical control was achieved in 50% of females before pregnancy and 75% at the last follow-up after delivery. Data analysis showed no differences in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) between acromegaly-active or acromegaly-controlled groups. The GDM prevalence in patients diagnosed during pregnancy (33.3%) was higher than that in patients diagnosed before pregnancy (4.8%) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy without biochemical control in acromegaly and receiving medical treatment during pregnancy are not rare and generally safe for the fetus. There could be a higher prevalence of PIH in acromegalic pregnancies. The treatment of acromegaly and related complications can be managed with regular follow-up after pregnancy.
Assuntos
Acromegalia , Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Lactente , Acromegalia/complicações , Acromegalia/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Família , Análise de Dados , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Anemia and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are amongst major clinical and public health challenges in South Asia that influence the progression of chronic health problems in this population. Despite a growing body of research on these problems, there is a lack synthesized evidence on the burden of anemia among people with DM in this region. This meta-analytic review was conducted to estimate the prevalence of anemia among people with DM in South Asia. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in five primary databases and additional sources up to July 29, 2022, that reported the prevalence of anemia among DM patients in any of the eight South Asian countries. Observational studies that met pre-determined eligibility criteria according to the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022348433) were included in this meta-analysis. Random effect models were used to estimate pooled prevalence. RESULTS: Of the 40 eligible studies, 38 underwent meta-analysis representing 14,194 participants with DM. The pooled prevalence of anemia was 45% (95% CI: 37.0-54.0, I2 = 99.28%, p = 0.00) among diabetic people in South Asia. In sub-group analysis, the pooled prevalence of anemia was higher in females (48%, 95% CI: 37.0-60.0, I2 = 98.86%, p = 0.00) compared to males (39%, 95% CI: 29.0-48.0, I2 = 98.18%, p = 0.00). Diabetic patients with older age (≥ 50 years) reported higher pooled estimates of anemia (48%, 95% CI: 38.0-58.0, I2 = 99.07%) than younger age group (< 50 years) (34%, 95% CI: 21.0-47.0, I2 = 98.83%). In addition, we found variation in pooled prevalence estimates of anemia considering the type of DM, such as type 1 reported 2% (95% CI: 0.00-4.00), type-2 reported 48% (95% CI: 40.0-56.0, I2 = 98.94%), and Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) reported 6% (95% CI: 3.00-12.0). CONCLUSION: High pooled estimates of anemia among diabetic patients in South Asia, including publication bias, warrants further clinical and public health research following standard research methods to understand the more context-specific epidemiological insights and evidence.
Assuntos
Anemia , Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Ásia Meridional , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Anemia/epidemiologia , Estudos Observacionais como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had indirect effects on pregnancy outcomes. There is limited data on the impact on gestational diabetes (GDM) in diverse populations and the possible underlying mediators. This study aimed to assess the risk of GDM pre-COVID-19 and in two distinct pandemic exposure periods, and to determine the potential factors contributing to increased risk in a multiethnic population. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed of women with singleton pregnancy receiving antenatal care at three hospitals two years pre-COVID-19 (January 2018 - January 2020), first year of COVID-19 with limited pandemic-mitigating restrictions (February 2020 - January 2021) and second year of COVID-19 with stringent restrictions (February 2021 - January 2022). Baseline maternal characteristics and gestational weight gain (GWG) were compared between cohorts. The primary outcome was GDM, assessed using univariate and multivariate generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS: 28,207 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria, 14,663 pregnancies two years pre-COVID-19, 6,890 in COVID-19 Year 1 and 6,654 in COVID-19 Year 2. Maternal age increased across exposure periods (30.7 ± 5.0 years pre-COVID-19 vs 31.0 ± 5.0 years COVID-19 Year 1 vs 31.3 ± 5 years COVID-19 Year 2; p < 0.001). There were increases in pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (25.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2 vs 25.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2 vs 26.1 ± 5.7 kg/m2; p < 0.001), proportion who were obese (17.5% vs 18.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.001) and proportion with other traditional risk factors for GDM including South Asian ethnicity and prior history of GDM. Rate of GWG and proportion exceeding recommended GWG increased with pandemic exposure (64.3% vs 66.0% vs 66.6%; p = 0.009). GDM diagnosis increased across exposure periods (21.2% vs 22.9% vs 24.8%; p < 0.001). Both pandemic exposure periods were associated with increased risk of GDM on univariate analysis, only COVID-19 Year 2 remaining significantly associated after adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics and GWG (OR 1.17 [1.06, 1.28], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of GDM increased with pandemic exposure. Progressive sociodemographic changes and greater GWG may have contributed to increased risk. However, exposure to the second year of COVID-19 remained independently associated with GDM after adjusting for shifts in maternal characteristics and GWG.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Massa CorporalRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess benefits and harms arising from increasing gestational diabetes (GDM) diagnosis, including for women with normal-sized babies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Diagnosis rates, outcomes, interventions and medication use are compared in a retrospective cohort study of 229 757 women birthing in public hospitals of the Australian State of Queensland during two periods, 2011-2013 and 2016-2018, using data from the Queensland Perinatal Data Collection. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons include hypertensive disorders, caesarean section, shoulder dystocia and associated harm, induction of labour (IOL), planned birth (PB), early planned birth <39 weeks (EPB), spontaneous labour onset with vaginal birth (SLVB) and medication use. RESULTS: GDM diagnosis increased from 7.8% to 14.3%. There was no improvement in shoulder dystocia associated injuries, hypertensive disorders or caesarean sections. There was an increase in IOL (21.8%-30.0%; p<0.001), PB (36.3% to 46.0%; p<0.001) and EPB (13.5%-20.6%; p<0.001), and a decrease in SLVB (56.0%-47.3%; p<0.001). Women with GDM experienced an increase in IOL (40.9%-49.8%; p<0.001), PB (62.9% to 71.8%; p<0.001) and EPB (35.3%-45.7%; p<0.001), and a decrease in SLVB (30.01%-23.6%; p<0.001), with similar changes for mothers with normal-sized babies. Of women prescribed insulin in 2016-2018, 60.4% experienced IOL, 88.5% PB, 76.4% EPB and 8.0% SLVB. Medication use increased from 41.2% to 49.4% in women with GDM, from 3.2% to 7.1% in the antenatal population overall, from 3.3% to 7.5% in women with normal-sized babies and from 2.21% to 4.38% with babies less than the 10th percentile. CONCLUSION: Outcomes were not apparently improved with increased GDM diagnosis. The merits of increased IOL or decreased SLVB depend on the views of individual women, but categorising more pregnancies as abnormal, and exposing more babies to the potential effects of early birth, medication effects and growth limitation may be harmful.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Distocia do Ombro , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cesárea , Queensland/epidemiologia , AustráliaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy has been considered as one of the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among women. Although the evidence regarding the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and subsequent CVD has been synthesised, there are no systematic reviews covering the evidence of the association among the non-GDM population. This systematic review and meta-analysis, therefore, aim to fill the gap by summarising existing evidence on the association between maternal glucose levels and the risk of future CVD in pregnant women with or without a diagnosis of GDM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL to identify relevant papers from inception to 31 December 2022. All observational studies (case-control studies, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies) will be included. Two reviewers will perform the abstract and full-text screening based on the eligibility criteria through Covidence. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the I2 test and Cochrane's Q test. If the included studies are found to be homogeneous, pooled estimates will be calculated and meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager 5 (RevMan) software. Random effects will be used to determine weights for meta-analysis, if needed. Pre-specified subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed, if needed. The study results will be presented in the sequence of main outcomes, secondary outcomes and important subgroup analysis for each type of glucose level separately. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Given no original data will be collected, ethics approval is not applicable for this review. The results of this review will be disseminated by publication and conference presentation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022363037.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Gestacional , Hiperglicemia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Glucose , Metanálise como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Obesity in pregnancy carries significant maternal and fetal risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 485 pregnant women who delivered at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, during the period of three years (2018-2020) and compared them against the body mass index (BMI). Correlation coefficient was calculated for BMI and seven pregnancy complications (hypertensive syndrome, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture of membranes, mode of delivery and postpartum hemorrhage). The collected data were presented in the form of median values and relative numbers (the measure of variability). The implementation of the simulation model and its verification were carried out using a specialized programming language, Python. Statistical models were created where the Chi-square and p-value were as determined for every observed outcome. RESULTS: The average age of the subjects was 35.79 years and average BMI 29.28 kg/m2. A statistically significant correlation was found between the BMI and arterial hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia and cesarean section. The correlations between the body mass index and postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction and premature rupture of membranes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: As high BMI correlates with a number of negative outcomes in pregnancy, weight control before and during pregnancy and proper antenatal and intranatal care are necessary to achieve a favorable pregnancy outcome.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Complicações na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da GravidezRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Short interpregnancy interval is defined as conception occurring within 18 months of a previous live birth. Studies show increased risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age with short interpregnancy intervals; however, it is unclear if these risks are higher for all short interpregnancy intervals or only for those less than 6 months. The objective of this study was to evaluate prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among people with short interpregnancy intervals, stratified by degree: less than 6 months, 6 to 11 months, and 12 to 17 months. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people with 2 singleton pregnancies between 2015 and 2018 at a single academic center. The following outcomes were compared between patients with interpregnancy intervals of less than 6 months, 6 to 11 months, 12 to 17 months, and 18 months or more; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension and preeclampsia), preterm birth at less than 37 weeks, low birth weight ( < 2500 g), congenital anomalies, and gestational diabetes. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were done to examine the independent role of the degree of short interpregnancy interval and each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1,462 patients were included in the analysis, with 80 pregnancies occurring at interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months, 181 at 6 to 11 months, 223 at 12 to 17 months, and 978 at 18 months or more. In unadjusted analysis, patients with interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months had the highest rate of preterm birth at 15.0%. In addition, patients with interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and 12 to 17 months had higher rates of congenital anomalies versus those with interpregnancy intervals of 18 months or more. In multivariate analysis, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical confounding factors, interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months were associated with 2.3 higher odds of preterm birth (95% CI, 1.13-4.68), and those 12 to 17 months were associated with 2.52 higher odds of congenital anomalies (95% CI, 1.22-5.20). The odds of gestational diabetes were lower with interpregnancy intervals of 6 to 11 months compared to those 18 months or more (aOR 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-site cohort, people with interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months had higher odds of preterm birth, while those with interpregnancy intervals 12 to 17 months had higher odds of congenital anomalies, compared with the control group with interpregnancy intervals greater than or equal to 18 months. Future research should focus on identifying modifiable risk factors for short interpregnancy intervals and interventions to reduce them.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Intervalo entre Nascimentos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
To review the current evidence on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women with endometriosis, taking into account relevant confounders such as the higher frequency of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) conceptions. Database searches on PubMed, Medline, Embase and Scopus through June 2022, using combinations of relevant keywords. A total of 18 studies, involving N = 4,600,885 women, were included. The overall risk of GDM in endometriosis patients was significantly higher than in controls (OR, 1.23; 95% CI 1.07-1.51). This significant association persisted in natural pregnancies (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.12) but not in pregnancies conceived through ART (OR, 0.93;95% CI 0.70-1.24). Based on the limited number of studies that examined this association in relation to endometriosis phenotype, an increased risk was found in more severe stages (OR, 3.20; 95% CI 1.20-8.54) but independently from localization of the lesions. Endometriosis increases the risk of GDM, with a possible progressive effect in more advanced stages of the disease. Although the effect magnitude may be limited in some subgroups, this finding has a clinically relevant impact due to both the strong biological plausibility and to the relatively high incidence of both endometriosis and GDM.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Endometriose , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/etiologia , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Fertilização , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fruit, vegetable, and fruit juice intake is associated with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, the conclusion is limited and conflicted. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the association between fruit, vegetable, and fruit juice consumption and the risk of GDM. METHODS: To find relevant studies, we searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Ovid, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP for the report on prospective cohort studies published from inception to April 8, 2022. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 32,794 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Total fruit consumption was associated with a lower risk of GDM (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.99). Whereas an increasing the consumption of vegetable, including all vegetable (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.87-1.03), starchy vegetable (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.82-1.26), and fruit juice (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.91-1.04) was not associated with a reduction in the risk of GDM. In a doseâresponse analysis of eight studies, a 3% reduction in risk of GDM for a 100 g/d increase in fruit consumption (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that higher fruit consumption may reduce the risk of GDM, with a 3% reduction in the risk of GDM for every 100 g/d increase in fruit intake. Higher-quality prospective studies or randomized clinical trials are required to validate the effect of different variations of fruits, vegetables, and fruit juice consumption on the risk of GDM.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Verduras , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Frutas , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Comportamento Alimentar , Estudos Prospectivos , Sucos de Frutas e VegetaisRESUMO
Background: The incidence of diabetes mellitus (both pregestational and gestational) is increasing worldwide, and hyperglycemia during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of metformin during pregnancy has accumulated resulting in an increase in its prescription in many reports. Aims: We aimed to determine the prevalence of antidiabetic drug use (insulins and blood glucose-lowering drugs) before and during pregnancy in Switzerland and the changes therein during pregnancy and over time. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study using Swiss health insurance claims (2012-2019). We established the MAMA cohort by identifying deliveries and estimating the last menstrual period. We identified claims for any antidiabetic medication (ADM), insulins, blood glucose-lowering drugs, and individual substances within each class. We defined three groups of pattern use based on timing of dispensation: (1) dispensation of at least one ADM in the prepregnancy period and in or after trimester 2 (T2) (pregestational diabetes); (2) dispensation for the first time in or after T2 (GDM); and (3) dispensation in the prepregnancy period and no dispensation in or after T2 (discontinuers). Within the pregestational diabetes group, we further defined continuers (dispensation for the same group of ADM) and switchers (different ADM group dispensed in the prepregnancy period and in or after T2). Results: MAMA included 104,098 deliveries with a mean maternal age at delivery of 31.7. Antidiabetic dispensations among pregnancies with pregestational and gestational diabetes increased over time. Insulin was the most dispensed medication for both diseases. Between 2017 and 2019, less than 10% of pregnancies treated for pregestational diabetes continued metformin rather than switching to insulin. Metformin was offered to less than 2% of pregnancies to treat gestational diabetes (2017-2019). Conclusion: Despite its position in the guidelines and the attractive alternative that metformin represents to patients who may encounter barriers with insulin therapy, there was reluctance to prescribe it.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Metformina , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Suíça/epidemiologia , Glicemia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Resultado da Gravidez , GlucoseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests an association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (pre-BMI) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the effects of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms on these relationships require further investigation. This study aimed to investigate whether the relationship between pre-BMI and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes was influenced by MTHFR gene polymorphisms. METHODS: A total of 5614 mother-fetus pairs were included in the study. The odds ratios (OR) of adverse pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension (GHT), cesarean delivery (CS), and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), were estimated using adjusted logistic regression models and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Pregnant women with higher pre-BMI values were positively related to the risk of GDM, GHT, and CS. In the subgroup analysis, underweight BMI was associated with a decreased risk of CS and GDM in pregnant women with the MTHFR A1298C AA or C677T CC genotype, while overweight/obese BMI was associated with an increased risk of GDM and CS in different MTHFR variants. Moreover, pregnant women with MTHFR A1298C AC + CC or C667T CC were found to have an increased risk of GHT in the MTHFR A1298C AA or C667T CT + TT genotype. A remarkable association was observed between the obesity group with MTHFR A1298C AC + CC (OR = 6.49, CI: 2.67-15.79) and the overweight group with the C667T CC genotype (OR = 4.72, CI: 2.13-10.45). CONCLUSIONS: MTHFR gene polymorphisms exert a modifying effect on the association between maternal pre-BMI and the risk of GHT, CS, and GDM. Pregnant women with a high pre-BMI with specific MTHFR genotypes should be considered for GHT development.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Gestantes , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Índice de Massa Corporal , Resultado da Gravidez , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/genética , Metilenotetra-Hidrofolato Redutase (NADPH2)/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Genótipo , China/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/genética , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/genéticaRESUMO
Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with a significantly increased risk of later type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Post-natal interventions aim to reduce this risk by addressing diet and lifestyle factors and frequently focus on restricting energy or macronutrient intake. With increased interest in the role of complete dietary patterns in the prevention of cardiometabolic disease, we sought to evaluate what is known about the role of dietary patterns in reducing cardiometabolic risk in women with previous GDM. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies relating to dietary pattern and cardiometabolic parameters in women with a history of GDM. The search criteria returned 6014 individual studies. In total, 71 full texts were reviewed, with 24 studies included in the final review. Eleven individual dietary patterns were identified, with the Alternative Health Eating Index (AHEI), Mediterranean diet (MD), and low glycaemic index (GI) as the most commonly featured dietary patterns. Relevant reported outcomes included incident T2DM and glucose tolerance parameters, as well as several cardiovascular risk factors. Dietary patterns which have previously been extensively demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in the general population, including AHEI, MD, and DASH, were found to be associated with a reduction in the incidence of T2DM, hypertension, and additional risk factors for cardiometabolic disease in women with a history of GDM. Notable gaps in the literature were identified, including the relationship between dietary patterns and incident CVD, as well as the relationship between a low GI diet and the development of T2DM in this population.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Dieta Mediterrânea , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the drug-related problems (DRPs) in high-risk pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus according to frequency, type, cause, and factors associated with their occurrence in the hospital setting. METHODOLOGY: This is an observational, longitudinal, prospective study that included 571 hospitalized pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus using at least one medication. DRPs were classified according to the Classification for Drug-Related Problems (PCNE V9.00). In addition to descriptive statistics, a univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was employed to determine the factors associated with the DRPs. RESULTS: A total of 873 DRPs were identified. The most frequent DRPs were related to therapeutic ineffectiveness (72.2%) and occurrence of adverse events (27.0%) and the main drugs involved were insulins and methyldopa. These were followed in the first five days of treatment by: the ineffectiveness of insulin (24.6%), associated with underdosage (12.9%) or insufficient frequency of administration (9.5%) and methyldopa associated with the occurrence of adverse reactions (40.2%) in the first 48h. Lower maternal age (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.938-0.995, p = 0.022), lower gestational age (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.938-0.996, p = 0.026), report of drug hypersensitivity (OR 2.295, 95% CI 1.220-4.317, p = 0.010), longer treatment time (OR 1.237, 95% CI: 1.147-1.333, p = 0.001) and number of prescribed medications (OR 1.211, 95% CI: 0.240-5.476, p = 0.001) were risk factors for occurrence of DRPs. CONCLUSION: DRPs are frequent in pregnant women with hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus, and they are mainly related to therapeutic ineffectiveness and the occurrence of adverse events.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Hipertensão , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Metildopa , Hospitais , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , InsulinaRESUMO
Objective: There is a lack of risk factors that can effectively identify gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in early pregnancy. It is unclear whether serum taurine in the first trimester and dynamic changes have different characteristics in GDM women. Whether these features are associated with the occurrence of GDM has not yet been elucidated. The main objective of this study was to observe the dynamic changes of serum taurine during pregnancy and investigate the relationship between serum taurine levels and GDM in the first and second trimesters. Methods: This was a nested case-control study in 47 women with GDM and 47 age-matched normoglycemic women. We examined serum taurine at 8-12 weeks' gestation and 24-28 weeks' gestation. The serum taurine of the two groups was compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate how serum taurine was associated with GDM. Results: The serum taurine concentration of GDM women was significantly lower than that of normoglycemic women in the first trimester(2.29 vs 3.94 µmol/L, P<0.001). As the pregnancy progressed, serum taurine concentration in normoglycaemic women decreased significantly(3.94 vs 2.47 µmol/L, P<0.001), but not in the GDM group(2.29 vs 2.37 µmol/L, P=0.249), resulting in the disappearance of differences between the two groups(2.47 vs 2.37 µmol/L, P=0.160). After adjustment for pre-pregnancy body mass index(BMI), fasting plasma glucose(FPG), and lipid profiles in the first trimester, the serum taurine concentration in the first trimester was negatively correlated with the risk of GDM(OR=0.017, 95% CI=0.003-0.107, P<0.001). Furthermore, dynamic change of serum taurine showed a significantly positive correlation with the risk of GDM(OR=9.909, 95% CI=3.556-27.610, P<0.001). Conclusion: Low serum taurine concentration in the first trimester was significantly associated with the development of GDM. As the pregnancy progressed, the association between serum taurine and GDM disappeared in the second trimester, which might be related to the inhibition of taurine transporter(TauT) activity by high glucose.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Segundo Trimestre da GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of the 2016 Chinese second child policy and different maternal ages on adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 22 monitoring hospitals in Hebei Province from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2021. A total of 413,892 parturient were divided into 3 groups based on delivery age: 20-34, 35-39, and 40-55 years old. The clinical data were analyzed to explore the relationship among the 2016 Chinese second-child policy, maternal age, and various pregnancy risks. RESULTS: Pregnancy complications showed an upward trend from 2013 to 2021.The top 10 incidences of pregnancy complications in Hebei Province were anemia, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), macrosomia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), premature delivery, preeclampsia (PE), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), placenta previa, and placental abruption. The two-child policy was implemented in 2016. The incidence of pregnancy complications, anemia, GDM, PE, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, premature delivery, SGA, LGA, macrosomia in 2016-2021 was significantly higher than that in 2013-2015 (P<0.05), and the proportion of women of advanced maternal age (AMA, ≥ 35 years old) increased from 2013 to 2021. Advanced maternal age was a risk factor for most assessed adverse pregnancy outcomes, including GDM, PE, placenta previa, placenta abruption, cesarean delivery, PPH, premature delivery, SGA, LGA and macrosomia. CONCLUSION: After the adjustment of the "second-child" policy, the incidence of pregnancy complications increased. Moreover, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in AMA has increased. Early prevention and intervention should be implemented to cope with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Assuntos
Política de Planejamento Familiar , Idade Materna , Complicações na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem , Descolamento Prematuro da Placenta/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , População do Leste Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Placenta Prévia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Política de Planejamento Familiar/tendências , Fatores Etários , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The cause of fetal overgrowth during pregnancy is still unclear. This study aimed to analyze and predict the risk of macrosomia in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: This study was a retrospective study collected from October 2020 to October 2021. A total of 6072 pregnant women with a routine 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24-28 gestational weeks were screened. Nearly equal numbers of pregnant women with gestational diabetes and with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included in the study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed to determine the index and inflection point for predicting macrosomia occurrence. RESULTS: The data of perinatal outcomes of 322 GDM and 353 NGT who had given birth to single live babies at term were analyzed. We found that significant cut-off values for the prediction of macrosomia are 5.13mmol/L in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 12.25kg in gestational weight gain (GWG), 3,605g in ultrasound fetal weight gain (FWG) and 124mm in amniotic fluid index (AFI).The area under the ROC curve of this predictive model combined all variables reached 0.953 (95% CI: 0.914 ~ 0.993) with a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 85.4%. CONCLUSIONS: FPG is positively associated with newborn birth weight. An early intervention to prevent macrosomia may be possible by combining maternal GWG, FPG, FWG, and AFI in gestational diabetes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Glicemia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aumento de Peso , Glucose , Jejum , Índice de Massa CorporalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in recent years with serious health ramifications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strength and validity of associations between diabetes and anti-diabetic interventions and the risk of any type of gynaecological or obstetric conditions. METHODS: Design: Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, manual screening of references. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and interventional studies investigating the relationship between diabetes and anti-diabetic interventions with gynaecological or obstetric outcomes. Meta-analyses that did not include complete data from individual studies, such as relative risk, 95% confidence intervals, number of cases/controls, or total population were excluded. DATA ANALYSIS: The evidence from meta-analyses of observational studies was graded as strong, highly suggestive, suggestive or weak according to criteria comprising the random effects estimate of meta-analyses and their largest study, the number of cases, 95% prediction intervals, I2 heterogeneity index between studies, excess significance bias, small study effect and sensitivity analysis using credibility ceilings. Interventional meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials were assessed separately based on the statistical significance of reported associations, the risk of bias and quality of evidence (GRADE) of included meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 117 meta-analyses of observational cohort studies and 200 meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials that evaluated 317 outcomes were included. Strong or highly suggestive evidence only supported a positive association between gestational diabetes and caesarean section, large for gestational age babies, major congenital malformations and heart defects and an inverse relationship between metformin use and ovarian cancer incidence. Only a fifth of the randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of anti-diabetic interventions on women's health reached statistical significance and highlighted metformin as a more effective agent than insulin on risk reduction of adverse obstetric outcomes in both gestational and pre-gestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Gestational diabetes appears to be strongly associated with a high risk of caesarean section and large for gestational age babies. Weaker associations were demonstrated between diabetes and anti-diabetic interventions with other obstetric and gynaecological outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (OSF) (Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9G6AB ).