Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 11.890
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(42): e22751, 2020 Oct 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33080740

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine and endometrial abnormalities is often associated with postoperative pain. This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of preoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine in reducing pain after hysteroscopy. METHODS: In total, 138 patients undergoing elective hysteroscopy at the CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 69) or a lidocaine group (n = 69), which received normal saline or IV lidocaine at 1.5 mg/kg, respectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pain. RESULTS: The incidence of pain was significantly lower in the IV lidocaine group than in the control group at the post-anesthesia care unit (27.3% vs 68.2%, P < .001). The visual analog scale (0-10) score (median [interquartile range]) was lower in the IV lidocaine group than in the control group (0 [0-2]) vs 2 [0-4]), P < .001). The use of rescue analgesics and postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar between the 2 groups. This study demonstrated that administering 1.5 mg/kg of preoperative IV lidocaine can be a simple method to reduce incidence of pain after hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION: Preoperative bolus administration of 1.5 mg/kg of IV lidocaine may be used to decrease incidence of pain after hysteroscopy under general anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Histeroscopia , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Escala Visual Analógica
2.
Mymensingh Med J ; 29(4): 951-955, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33116101

RESUMO

The incidence of visceral pain among caesarean section can be as high as 50% in sub arachnoid block (SAB) in spite adequate sensory block, which requires conversion to general anesthesia. Different types of adjuvant have been used to augment the effect of local anesthetics but their use is limited due to adverse effects. The effect of intrathecal midazolam along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in sub arachnoid block is less known. So this randomized, double blind study was conducted to evaluate the additive effect of 0.4ml midazolam to 0.5% 3ml bupivacaine on sub arachnoid block in scheduled elective caesarean section. This study demonstrated that the addition of intrathecal 0.4ml midazolam to spinal 0.5% bupivacaine kept all the characteristics of block unaffected, furthermore pain score VAS 3.4±1.3 in Group A and 1.8±1.22 in Group B which is statistically significant, the requirement of intraoperative analgesia and also increased the duration of postoperative analgesia that is 130.3±5.4 minute in Group A, 265.1±3.6 minute in Group B and also statistically significant. Therefore addition of 2.0mg midazolam with 0.5% bupivacaine significantly reduces the VAS score, reduces the intraoperative visceral pain and need of analgesia.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Anestésicos Locais , Midazolam , Dor Pós-Operatória , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bupivacaína , Cesárea , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Espinhais , Midazolam/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(43): e22667, 2020 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120758

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is accompanied by moderate to severe postoperative pain. Postoperative pain hampers the functional recovery and lowers patient satisfaction with the surgery. Recently, the adductor canal block (ACB) has been widely used in total knee arthroplasty. However, there is no definite answer as to the location of a continuous block within the ACBs. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials about relevant studies were searched in PubMed (1996 to Oct 2019), Embase (1996 to Oct 2019), and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, Oct 2019). RESULTS: Five studies involving 348 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data indicated that the proximal ACB was as effective as the distal ACB in terms of total opioid consumption (P = .54), average visual analog scale (VAS) score (P = .35), worst VAS score (P = .19), block success rate (P = .86), and time of catheter insertion (P = .54). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the distal ACB, the proximal ACB showed similar analgesic efficacy for total opioid consumption, average VAS score, worst VAS score, block success rate, and time of catheter insertion. However, because of the limited number of involved studies, more high-quality studies are needed to further identify the optimal location of the ACB.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Nervo Femoral , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(41): e22251, 2020 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33031265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The randomized controlled study aimed to examine the efficacy of preoperative ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block combined with ropivacaine in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomized to ESP block group receiving ropivacaine (Group A) and control group (Group B), n = 30 per group. Visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded in both the groups during rest and movement at the various time intervals. Both the groups were also compared for time to initial anal exhaust, analgesic usage, early postoperative complications and side-effects, walk distance after the operation, time to out-of-bed activity, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the demographic characteristics. For group A, when compared to group B, VAS scores during rest and movement within post-operative 24 hours were decreased, the time of first anus exhaust and ambulation were earlier, analgesic consumption and the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and headache was reduced, the duration of hospital stay were shorter with longer walk distance. CONCLUSION: ESP block combined with ropivacaine treatment effectively reduced early postoperative pain and improved recovery after hepatectomy.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Hepatectomia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Músculos Paraespinais , Ropivacaina/uso terapêutico , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor
5.
Am J Vet Res ; 81(9): 699-707, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112167

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine perioperative analgesia associated with oral administration of a novel methadone-fluconazole-naltrexone formulation in dogs undergoing routine ovariohysterectomy. ANIMALS: 43 healthy female dogs. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive the methadone-fluconazole-naltrexone formulation at 1 of 2 dosages (0.5 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, and 0.125 mg/kg, respectively, or 1.0 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, and 0.25 mg/kg, respectively, PO, q 12 h, starting the evening before surgery; n = 15 each) or methadone alone (0.5 mg/kg, SC, q 4 h starting the morning of surgery; 13). Dogs were sedated with acepromazine, and anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. A standard ovariohysterectomy was performed by experienced surgeons. Sedation and pain severity (determined with the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale-short form [GCPS-SF]) were scored for 48 hours after surgery. Rescue analgesia was to be provided if the GCPS-SF score was > 6. Dogs also received carprofen starting the day after surgery. RESULTS: None of the dogs required rescue analgesia. The highest recorded GCPS-SF score was 4. A significant difference in GCPS-SF score among groups was identified at 6:30 am the day after surgery, but not at any other time. The most common adverse effect was perioperative vomiting, which occurred in 11 of the 43 dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oral administration of a methadone-fluconazole-naltrexone formulation at either of 2 dosages every 12 hours (3 total doses) was as effective as SC administration of methadone alone every 4 hours (4 total doses) in dogs undergoing routine ovariohysterectomy. Incorporation of naltrexone in the novel formulation may provide a deterrent to human opioid abuse or misuse.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Doenças do Cão , Administração Oral , Analgesia/veterinária , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Animais , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Cães , Feminino , Fluconazol , Humanos , Histerectomia/veterinária , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/veterinária
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(40): e22477, 2020 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33019439

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a procedure used for management of refractory renal calculi. Oral and parenteral opioids, along with local anesthetic infiltration, neuraxial anesthesia, and paravertebral blocks are the most common methods of managing intra-operative and post-operative pain for these patients. The erector spinae plane block with catheter (ESPC) is a newer interfascial regional anesthetic technique that can be used to manage peri-operative pain in these patients. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Three patients complained of significant flank pain were scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia in the prone position. DIAGNOSES: Patients were diagnosed with large renal calculi. THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ESPC in the pre-operative holding area at the level of the T7 transverse process. The ESPCS were bolused with a solution of 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine with 4 mg dexamethasone prior to surgery. Patients also received oral tramadol 50 mg and acetaminophen 1 g as part of the multimodal pain protocol prior to surgery. After the procedure, the patients were bolused with 0.25% bupivacaine or started on an infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine to manage their pain. OUTCOMES: No opioid or other pain medications, other than the local anesthetic solution given in the ESPCs, were used during the intra-operative or post-operative period for management of pain in these patients. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were below 4 for all patients in the post-operative period, and patients did not report any issues with post-operative nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSION: These patients were compared to 3 prior patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ESPC. The 3 patients without ESPC placement reported increased VAS scores, had increased opioid/pain medication consumption intraoperatively and postoperatively, and had increased incidence of perioperative nausea when compared to our ESPC patients. Our report shows that ESPC, in combination with a multimodal pain protocol, can be a good option for management of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos Paraespinais
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(43): e22762, 2020 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as an attractive alternative for femoral nerve blocks (FNB) as the peripheral nerve block of choice for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), preserving quadriceps motor function while providing analgesia comparable to FNB. However, its optimal application for TKA remains controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare continuous-injection ACB (CACB) vs single-injection ACB (SACB) for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: This study attempts to identify the available and relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the analgesic effects of CACB compared to SACB in patients undergoing TKA according to electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMbase, and the Cochrane Library, up to September 2019. Primary outcomes in this regard included the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score with rest or activity, while secondary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications of vomiting and nausea, and rescue analgesia. The corresponding data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. ETHICAL REVIEW: Because all of the data used in this systematic review and meta-analysis has been published, the ethical approval was not necessary RESULTS:: This research included 9 studies comprised of 739 patients. The analyzed outcomes demonstrated that patients who received CACB had a better at rest-VAS scores at 4 hours (P = .007), 8 hors (P < .0001), 12 hours (P < .0001), 24 hours (P = .02), mobilization-VAS score at 48 hours (P < .0001), and rescue analgesia (P = .03) than those who underwent SACB. Nevertheless, no significant differences were present between the 2 strategies in terms of pain VAS scores 48 hours at rest (P = .23) and 24 hours at mobilization (P = .10), complications of vomiting and nausea (P = .42), and length of hospital stay (P = .09). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicated that CACB is superior to SACB in regard to analgesic effect following TKA. However, due to the variation of the included studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn. Further investigations into RCT are required for verification.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Nervo Femoral , Humanos , Injeções , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0237363, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017425

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of paravertebral block (PVB) versus intercostal nerve block (INB) in thoracic surgery and breast surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to February 2020 for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of PVB compared with INB after thoracic surgery and breast surgery. For binary variables, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. For continuous variables, weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used. RevMan5. 3 and Stata/MP 14.0 were used for performing the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9 trials including 440 patients (PVB block:222 patients; INB: 218 patients) met the inclusion criteria. In the primary outcome, there was no significant differences between the two groups with respect to postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1h (Std. MD = -0. 20; 95% CI = -1. 11to 0. 71; P = 0. 66), 2h (Std. MD = -0. 71; 95% CI = -2. 32to 0. 91; P = 0. 39), 24h (Std. MD = -0. 36; 95% CI = -0. 73 to -0. 00; P = 0. 05) and 48h (Std. MD = -0. 04; 95% CI = -0. 20 to 0. 11; P = 0. 57). However, there was significant difference in VAS of non Chinese subgroup at 1h (Std. MD = 0. 33; 95% CI = 0. 25to 0. 41; P<0. 00001) and VAS of Chinese subgroup at 24h (Std. MD = -0.32; 95% CI = -0.49 to-0.14; P = 0.0003). In the secondary outcome, the analysis also showed no significant difference between the groups according to the rates of postoperative nausea and vomit (OR = 0. 63; 95% CI = 0. 38 to 1. 03; P = 0. 06) and the rates of postoperative additional analgesia (OR = 0. 57; 95% CI = 0. 21 to 1. 55; P = 0. 27). There was significant difference in postoperative consumption of morphine (Std. MD = -14. 57; 95% CI = -26. 63 to -0.25; P = 0. 02). CONCLUSION: Compared with INB, PVB can provide better analgesia efficacy and cause lower consumption of morphine after thoracic surgery and breast surgery.


Assuntos
Mama/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Analgesia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Nervos Intercostais , Masculino , Mastectomia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Segurança , Coluna Vertebral/inervação , Toracoscopia , Toracotomia , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 33(6): 746-752, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002959

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: General anesthesia is a popular choice for ambulatory surgery. Spinal anesthesia is often avoided because of perceived delays due to time required to administer it and prolonged onset, as well as concerns of delayed offset, which may delay recovery and discharge home. However, the reports of improved outcomes in hospitalized patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty have renewed the interest in spinal anesthesia. This review article critically assesses the role of spinal anesthesia in comparison with fast-track general anesthesia for the outpatient setting. RECENT FINDINGS: The purported benefits of spinal anesthesia include avoidance of airway manipulation and the adverse effects of drugs used to provide general anesthesia, improved postoperative pain, and reduced postoperative opioid requirements. Improved postoperative outcomes after spinal anesthesia in hospitalized patients may not apply to the outpatient population that tends to be relatively healthier. Also, it is unclear if spinal anesthesia is superior to fast-track general anesthesia techniques, which includes avoidance of benzodiazepine premedication, avoidance of deep anesthesia, use of an opioid-sparing approach, and minimization of neuromuscular blocking agents with appropriate reversal of residual paralysis. SUMMARY: The benefits of spinal anesthesia in the outpatient setting remain questionable at best. Further studies should seek clarification of these goals and outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/tendências , Humanos
11.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 33(6): 753-759, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33027075

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postoperative pain is frequent while, on the other hand, there is a grooving general concern on using effective opioid pain killers in view of the opioid crisis and significant incidence of opioid abuse. The present review aims at describing nonopioid measures in order to optimize and tailor perioperative pain management in ambulatory surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Postoperative pain should be addressed both preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The management should basically be multimodal, nonopioid and procedure-specific. Opioids should only be used when needed on top of multimodal nonopioid prophylaxis, and then limited to a few days at maximum, unless strict control is applied. The individual patient should be screened preoperatively for any risk factors for severe postoperative pain and/or any abuse potential. SUMMARY: Basic multimodal analgesia should start preoperatively or peroperatively and include paracetamol, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 specific inhibitor or conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and in most cases dexamethasone and local anaesthetic wound infiltration. If any of these basic analgesics are contraindicated or there is an extra risk of severe postoperative pain, further measures may be considered: nerve-blocks or interfascial plane blocks, gabapentinnoids, clonidine, intravenous lidocaine infusion or ketamine infusion. In the abuse-prone patient, a preferably nonopioid perioperative approach should be aimed at.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Epidemia de Opioides , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico
12.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 33(6): 760-767, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33027077

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite peripheral nerve blockade offering analgesic benefits and improving patient satisfaction, it has not been well adopted in ambulatory anesthesia. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence underlying peripheral nerve blockade, local anesthetic adjuncts, continuous peripheral nerve blockade and novel analgesic modalities, with the objective to provide recommendations on postoperative analgesia optimization after peripheral nerve blockade in an ambulatory setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Barriers to the widespread use of peripheral nerve blockade in ambulatory anesthesia could include lack of education and training, and increased anesthetic induction time. Strategies that have demonstrated promise to increase duration of action and attenuate rebound pain phenomenon after peripheral nerve blockade include multimodal analgesia, local anesthetic adjuncts and continuous infusion of local anesthetic. Dexamethasone has been demonstrated to be the most effective local anesthetic adjunct. Continuous peripheral nerve blockade is a reasonable alternative but at the expense of additional costs and logistical reorganization. There is currently insufficient data to promote the ambulatory use of liposomal bupivacaine, cryoanalgesia and percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation. SUMMARY: Educational programs and parallel processing may promote peripheral nerve blockade in an ambulatory setting, improving the patient experience in the postoperative period. Intravenous dexamethasone should be considered wherever appropriate as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy to optimize postoperative pain control.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestesia por Condução , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(36): e21971, 2020 Sep 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32899035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in the treatment of total knee and hip arthroplasty patients. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. We also reviewed the references of all identified articles to identify additional studies. For each study, we assessed the risk ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to synthesize outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: We included 13 studies with 942 patients for meta-analysis. LIA significantly decreased the pain value with rest or mobilization until 72 hours (P < .05). LIA significantly decreased cumulative morphine consumption by 13.52 mg. Moreover, the length of hospital stay was lower in the LIA group than in the ITM analgesia group. Finally, LIA significantly reduced morphine-related complications (nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and respiration depression). CONCLUSIONS: LIA was an effective approach for relieving postoperative pain and reducing postoperative consumption of morphine compared with ITM in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Local , Humanos , Injeções Espinhais , Tempo de Internação , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(36): e21994, 2020 Sep 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32899045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most serious type of cervical spondylosis, which is often treated surgically in patients with progressive neurological symptoms following ineffective conservative treatment. However, some patients have residual symptoms such as neck pain, stiffness, and C5 nerve palsy after surgery. The Qishe pill can effectively relieve the symptoms of neck pain and numbness, but there is no evidence showing the efficacy and safety of the Qishe pill in treating symptoms after spinal cord surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Qishe Pill. A total of 330 patients with CSM who receive surgical treatment will be randomly divided into 2 groups, treated for 12 weeks and with a 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome will be Japanese Orthopaedic Association score from the baseline to 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include Visual Analogue Scale score, Neck Disability Index, and imaging indicators (including magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray). Additionally, adverse reactions will be observed and recorded as safety indicators. DISCUSSION: Although the Qishe pill can effectively improve the discomfort of the neck and upper limbs in clinical applications, there is a lack of clinical research on postoperative patients. This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of the Qishe pill in treating postoperative symptoms of CSM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov ID: ChiCTR1900028173. Registered on 17 December 2019.


Assuntos
Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Fitoterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Doenças da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Espondilose/complicações
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(37): e21956, 2020 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported short-term analgesic efficacy of obturator nerve block (ONB), as in comparison with the femoral nerve block (FNB) in the treatment of postoperative pain after the total knee replacement (TKR). The optimal method remains under debate. The purpose of our current work is to compare the safety and efficacy of FNB and ONB for postoperative analgesia after TKR. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, and controlled study was performed from January 2018 to December 2019. It was authorized via the Institutional Review Committee in NO.971 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Navy (2019-PLAN-132).Two hundred patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, the control group (n = 100) and study group (n = 100). The experimental group received FNB and control groups received ONB. Primary outcome included pain at different time point (Visual Analogue Scale score of anterior knee pain at rest and in motion). The Visual Analogue Scale scores were marked by patients themselves on a paper with a graduated line starting at 0 (no pain) and ending at 10 (the most painful). Opioid consumption was converted to equivalents of oral morphine uniformly for statistical analysis. Secondary outcomes included the knee range of motion, the hospital stay length as well as the postoperative complications such as pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Table 1 will show the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This trial would provide an evidence for the use of different types of peripheral nerve blocks in TKR.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Nervo Femoral , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Debilidade Muscular/etiologia , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Nervo Obturador , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Músculo Quadríceps
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(37): e22158, 2020 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain management after the total joint arthroplasty is still challenging, but worthy of attention, because good pain management can improve the outcomes of patient. It is still controversial whether fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) can effectively decrease the opioid consumption and pain after total hip replacement (THR) owing to the number of published investigations is small. The purpose of this present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of FICB for postoperative analgesia after THR. METHODS: This is a single center, placebo-controlled randomized trial which is performed in accordance with the SPIRIT Checklist for randomized studies. It was authorized via the Chifeng Municipal Hospital institutional review committee (H2020-19-8). 100 patients undergoing THR will be included in this study. Patients are randomly divided into 2 groups: FICB group or Non-FICB group, FICB with 5mgmL of epinephrine and 40 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Primary outcomes are pain score at different time point. Visual analog scale is used to assess the pain (10: the maximum possible pain and 0: absent pain). The secondary outcomes are the postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and total consumption of opioid. All the needed analyses are implemented through utilizing SPSS for Windows Version 15.0. RESULTS: Figure 1 will show the primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This trial can provide an evidence for the use of FICB for analgesia after THR.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Ropivacaina/administração & dosagem
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(35): e21672, 2020 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871881

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to be a painful orthopedic procedure and moderate to severe pain is common, especially immediately postoperatively and during active motion. The aim of the present study was to compare epidural analgesia (EA) and adductor canal block (ACB) techniques with regard to early period pain levels, need for additional opioids, and ambulation and functional scores in patients who had undergone primary TKA. METHODS: Approval for the study was granted by the Changji Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Written informed consent will be obtained from all of the participants. Inclusion criteria included the following: planned unilateral TKA; spinal anesthesia; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification score of I to III. Prospective assessment will be done for 100 patients who are scheduled for unilateral primary TKA surgery in our academic hospital by a single senior surgeon between August 2020 and December 2021. Patients were randomized to ACB treatment or EA treatment by a computer random number generator. The primary outcome was visual analog scale pain scores in the immediate postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid use, length of hospital stay, activity level during physical therapy, and knee range of motion. Results were evaluated in a confidence interval of 95% and at a significance level of P < .05. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that standard ACB would be as effective as EA for postoperative pain management following TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5775).


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
18.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 45(4): 406-410, 2020 Apr 28.
Artigo em Inglês, Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32879065

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of different ways of cocktail analgesic mixture injection on total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A total of 50 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated by TKA from July to September 2018 were randomly divided into two groups (n=25). The Group 1 underwent anterior intra-articular injection before prosthesis implanted while the Group 2 underwent posterior intra-articular injection before prosthesis implanted. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of all patients for pain during activity and at rest, maximal flexion degree of the knee at the 48th h and the 72th h after surgery, the time of raise leg, usage rate of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and complications were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: VAS for pain at rest of patients in the Group 1 was significantly less than that in the Group 2 at the 6th, 12th, and 24th h after surgery (all P<0.05). Maximal flexion degree of the knee at the 48th h and the 72th h after surgery in the Group 1 was better than that in the Group 2 (both P<0.05). The Group 1 costed less time than the Group 2 on the ability to perform an active straight leg raise (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The anterior intra-articular cocktail analgesic mixture injection can strongly relieve the pain early after TKA, which can improve knee function and achieve painless rehabilitation in most patients, with safety.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Analgésicos , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle
19.
J Perioper Pract ; 30(9): 277-282, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869726

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has changed the approach to operating on breast cancer for the benefit of patients, staff and the general population. One approach involves the switch from operating under general to local anaesthetic. We assess whether diluational local anaesthetic is as effective as the current standard approach. METHODS: Postoperative pain was recorded in prospective, consecutive patients undergoing wide local excision under dilutional local anaesthetic (concentration < 1mg/ml). Pain scores were documented at 0, 30 and 60 minutes and compared to a control group consisting of combined general with local anaesthetic. RESULTS: Pain significantly increased in the control group during the postoperative recovery. This was not seen in the dilutional local anaesthetic group that was non-inferior to the standard approach at 0, 30 and 60 minutes. CONCLUSION: Dilutional local anaesthetic provides a safe and effective alternative approach to operating on breast cancer patients whilst avoiding risky general anaesthetic in a COVID-19 pandemic environment.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Infecções por Coronavirus , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Difusão , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(33): e21670, 2020 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872033

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established and successful surgical procedure which is the major treatment for degenerative knee joint diseases. A novel technique to address posterior knee joint pain is the infiltration of local anesthetic between the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK). The goal of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding IPACK to adductor canal block (ACB) after TKA. METHODS: This was a prospectively randomized trial that investigated the effectiveness and safety of the IPACK after TKA. Approval from Clinical Studies Ethical Committee in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University was obtained. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 or 2 with normal cognitive function. The patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment options: ACB-alone group and ACB + IPACK group. The primary outcome was the total morphine consumption during postoperative 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, time to first and total dosage of rescue morphine in postoperative 48 hours, early and late postoperative period (from postoperative day 0-3 months follow-up) performance-based test (Timed-Up and Go test, and quadriceps strength). Postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and other adverse events were also evaluated. RESULTS: It was hypothesized that when combined with a control group, the IPACK block would result in a lower morphine consumption and pain score after TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5765).


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Artéria Poplítea , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA