Teaching Medical Students to Use Supercomputers: A Personal Reflection.

At the "Kick Off" meeting for CompBioMed (compbiomed.eu), which was first funded in October 2016, I had no idea that one single sentence ("I wish I could teach this to medical students") would lead to a dedicated program of work to engage the clinicians and biomedical researchers of the future with supercomputing. This program of work which, within the CompBiomed Centre of Excellence, we have been calling "the CompBioMed Education and Training Programme," is a holistic endeavor that has been developed by and continues to be delivered with the expertise and support from experimental researchers, computer scientists, clinicians, HPC centers, and industrial partners within or associated with CompBioMed. The original description of the initial educational approach to training has previously been published (Townsend-Nicholson Interface Focus 10:20200003, 2020). In this chapter, I describe the refinements to the program and its delivery, emphasizing the highs and lows of delivering this program over the past 6 years. I conclude with suggestions for feasible measures that I believe will help overcome the barriers and challenges we have encountered in bringing a community of users with little familiarity of computing beyond the desktop to the petascale and beyond.

Atributos da atenção primária à sáude: a teoria e a prática em uma unidade de saúde da família na perspectiva de acadêmicos de medicina / Attributes of primary health care: theory and practice in a family health unit from the perspective of medical students / Atributos de la atención primaria de salud: teoría y práctica en una unidad de salud familiar desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de medicina

A Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS), definida a partir da Declaração de Alma- Ata, e, identificada mundialmente como uma estratégia de organização dos serviços de saúde, caracteriza-se como o primeiro nível de contato dos indivíduos, da família e da comunidade com o sistema nacional de saúde. Este trabalho constitui um relato de experiência desenvolvido a partir de uma atividade teórico-prática, que se propôs a analisar os atributos e os processos de trabalho da Atenção Primária à Saúde no contexto de uma Unidade de Saúde da Família (USF), no município de Foz do Iguaçu-PR, com o objetivo de relacionar a teoria com a prática, por meio de questionários, elaborados com base na literatura e, aplicado aos profissionais e usuários do sistema de saúde. Ademais, contou com a observação da rotina do processo de trabalho na unidade. A vivência oportunizou a identificação dos desafios e fragilidades referentes aos atributos da APS e dos elementos constituintes do processo de trabalho em saúde. Por fim, conclui-se que, no cotidiano dos serviços, a APS enfrenta muitas dificuldades em se estabelecer como previsto na literatura e, por isso, faz-se premente a participação social para sua efetivação e consagração como primeiro nível de contato com o sistema de saúde.

Primary Health Care (PHC), defined from the Declaration of Alma-Ata, and identified worldwide as a strategy for organizing health services, is characterized as the first level of contact of individuals, family and community with the national health system. This paper is an experience report developed from a theoretical-practical activity, which proposed to analyze the attributes and work processes of Primary Health Care in the context of a Family Health Unit (USF) in the municipality of Foz do Iguaçu-PR, with the objective of relating theory to practice, through questionnaires, prepared based on the literature and applied to professionals and users of the health system. In addition, there was observation of the routine of the work process in the unit. The experience made it possible to identify the challenges and weaknesses related to the attributes of PHC and the constituent elements of the health work process. Finally, it is concluded that, in the daily life of services, PHC faces many difficulties in establishing itself as predicted in the literature and, therefore, social participation is necessary for its effectiveness and consecration as the first level of contact with the health system.

La Atención Primaria de Salud (APS), definida a partir de la Declaración de Alma-Ata, e identificada mundialmente como una estrategia de organización de los servicios de salud, se caracteriza por ser el primer nivel de contacto de los individuos, la familia y la comunidad con el sistema nacional de salud. Este trabajo es un relato de experiencia desarrollado a partir de una actividad teórico-práctica, que se propuso analizar los atributos y procesos de trabajo de la Atención Primaria de Salud en el contexto de una Unidad de Salud de la Familia (USF) en el municipio de Foz do Iguaçu- PR, con el objetivo de relacionar la teoría con la práctica, a través de cuestionarios, elaborados con base en la literatura y aplicados a profesionales y usuarios del sistema de salud. Además, hubo observación de la rutina del proceso de trabajo en la unidad. La experiencia permitió identificar los desafíos y debilidades relacionados con los atributos de la APS y los elementos constitutivos del proceso de trabajo en salud. Finalmente, se concluye que, en el día a día de los servicios, la APS enfrenta muchas dificultades para establecerse como predice la literatura y, por lo tanto, es necesaria la participación social para su eficacia y consagración como primer nivel de contacto con el sistema de salud. PALABRAS CLAVE: Atención Primaria de Salud; Sistema Único de Salud; Políticas de Salud.

Evaluación de la dilatación cervical en simuladores comparada con una herramienta visual: estudio aleatorizado / Cervical dilation assessment in simulators compared to a visual tool: A randomized study / Avaliação da dilatação cervical em simuladores comparada a uma ferramenta visual: estudo randomizado

Objetivo: comprobar la tasa de evaluación correcta mediante la comparación visual directa de las medidas de dilatación cervical en modelos de cuello uterino de consistencia dura. Método: estudio aleatorizado abierto con 63 estudiantes de obstetricia a los que se les asignó usar o no la comparación visual directa con una guía de dilatación. Los estudiantes estimaron de forma ciega la dilatación cervical en simuladores con diferentes dilataciones. El resultado primario fue la tasa de evaluación correcta. Resultados: los estudiantes realizaron 441 pruebas. Se observó una mayor tasa de evaluación correcta en el grupo experimental que en el grupo control (47,3% versus 27,2%; p < 0,001; Odds Ratio = 2,41; intervalo de confianza del 95% = 1,62-3, 58). Conclusión: la comparación visual directa aumentó la precisión de la evaluación de la dilatación cervical en modelos de simulación de cuello, lo que podría ser beneficioso en el entrenamiento de laboratorio. Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos n.º U1111-1210-2389.

Objective: to verify the correct assessment rate when using direct visual comparison in the cervical dilation measures in hard-consistency cervix simulation models. Method: an open-label and randomized study conducted with 63 Obstetrics students that were designated either to use direct visual comparison in a dilation guide or not. The students estimated cervical dilation blindly in simulators with different dilations. The primary outcome was the correct assessment rate. Results: the students performed 141 tests. A higher correct assessment rate was found in the Experimental Group than in the Control Group (47.3% versus 27.2%; p<0.001; Odds Ratio = 2.41; 95% Confidence Interval = 1.62-3.58). Conclusion: the direct visual comparison increased precision of the cervical dilation assessment in cervix simulation models, with the possibility of being beneficial in laboratory training. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials No. U1111-1210-2389.

Objetivo: verificar a taxa de avaliação correta com o uso da comparação visual direta nas medidas de dilatação cervical em modelos de simulação de colo com consistência dura. Método: estudo randomizado aberto com 63 estudantes de obstetrícia que foram designados para usar comparação visual direta em um guia de dilatação ou não. Os estudantes estimaram cegamente a dilatação cervical em simuladores com diferentes dilatações. O desfecho primário foi a taxa de avaliação correta. Resultados: os estudantes realizaram 441 testes. Foi encontrada maior taxa de avaliação correta no grupo experimental do que no grupo controle (47,3% versus 27,2%; p <0,001; Odds Ratio = 2,41; intervalo de confiança de 95% = 1,62-3,58). Conclusão: a comparação visual direta aumentou a precisão da avaliação da dilatação cervical em modelos de simulação de colo, podendo ser benéfica no treinamento em laboratório. Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos nº U1111-1210-2389.

Implicaciones de las actividades prácticas en el Laboratorio de Habilidades y Simulación relacionadas con la motivación y los sentimientos de los estudiantes / Implications of practical activities in the Skills and Simulation Laboratory on students' motivation and feelings / Implicações das atividades práticas no Laboratório de Habilidades e Simulação relacionado a motivação e sentimentos dos alunos

Objetivo: verificar las implicaciones de las actividades prácticas en el Laboratorio de Habilidad y Simulación relacionadas con la motivación y los sentimientos expresados por los estudiantes universitarios cuando regresan a las actividades presenciales luego del aislamiento social ocasionado por la pandemia del COVID-19. Método: estudio cuasiexperimental, con un solo grupo y del tipo pre y postest, realizado mediante una intervención educativa basada en el entrenamiento de habilidades en administración de medicamentos y venopunción, con estudiantes de medicina de una universidad pública brasileña. La muestra estuvo conformada por 47 estudiantes. Para la recolección de datos se utilizaron los instrumentos de caracterización y autopercepción de los individuos y la Escala de Motivación Situacional. Resultados: en la muestra, el 98% mencionó la falta de actividades prácticas durante la pandemia. El sentimiento descrito con mayor frecuencia fue la ansiedad. Después de realizar la actividad, hubo un cambio en la frecuencia de los sentimientos expresados, aunque no hubo un cambio significativo en los niveles de motivación. Regulación Externa (5,1 - 5,6), Regulación Identificada (6,1 - 6,4) y Motivación Intrínseca (5,6 - 6,0) presentaron resultados altos, demostrando similitud con los sentimientos relatados por los estudiantes. Conclusión: la motivación es fundamental para un aprendizaje efectivo y el uso de metodologías activas refuerza de manera efectiva las habilidades construidas en los estudiantes frente al proceso de aprendizaje.

Objective: to verify the implications of practical activities in the Skills and Simulation Laboratory on the motivation and feelings expressed by undergraduate students when returning to face-to-face activities after the social isolation caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Method: a quasi-experimental study, with a single group and of the pre- and post-test type, carried out through an educational intervention based on skills training on medication administration and venipuncture, with medical students from a Brazilian public university. The sample was comprised by 47 students. The instruments of students' characterization and self-perceived feelings and the Situational Motivation Scale were used for data collection. Results: in the sample, 98% mentioned the lack of practical activities during the pandemic. The most frequently described feeling was anxiety. After carrying out the activity, there was a change in the frequency of expressed feelings, although there was no significant change in motivational levels. External Regulation (5.1 - 5.6), Identified Regulation (6.1 - 6.4) and Intrinsic Motivation (5.6 - 6.0) presented high results, showing similarity to the feelings reported by the learners. Conclusion: motivation is essential for effective learning and the use of active methodologies reinforces skills built in an affective way in the students facing the learning process.

Objetivo: verificar as implicações das atividades práticas no Laboratório de Habilidade e Simulação relacionado à motivação e os sentimentos expressos pelos estudantes universitários quando regressam às atividades presenciais após o isolamento social causado pela pandemia da COVID-19. Método: estudo quase-experimental, com um único grupo, do tipo pré e pós-teste, realizado por meio de uma intervenção educacional baseada no treino de habilidades de administração de medicamentos e punção venosa, com estudantes de medicina de uma universidade pública brasileira. A amostra foi composta por 47 estudantes. Para a coleta de dados, foram utilizados os instrumentos de caracterização dos sujeitos e sentimentos autopercebidos pelos estudantes e a Escala de Motivação Situacional. Resultados: na amostra, 98% referiram falta de atividades práticas durante a pandemia. O sentimento mais frequentemente descrito foi a ansiedade. Após a realização da atividade, observou-se uma mudança na frequência dos sentimentos expressos, embora não se tenha verificado uma mudança significativa nos níveis motivacionais. A Regulação Externa (5,1 - 5,6), a Regulação (6,1 - 6,4) e a Motivação Intrínseca (5,6 - 6,0) apresentaram resultados elevados, demostrando semelhança com os sentimentos relatados pelos alunos. Conclusão: a motivação é essencial para uma aprendizagem eficaz e a utilização de metodologias ativas reforça as habilidades construídas de uma forma efetiva nos estudantes frente ao processo de aprendizagem.

Teaching the Legacy of Slavery in American Medicine and Psychiatry to Medical Students: Feasibility, Acceptability, Opportunities for Growth.

Introduction: Understanding the legacy of slavery in the United States is crucial for engaging in anti-racism that challenges racial health inequities' root causes. However, few medical educational curricula exist to guide this process. We created a workshop illustrating key historical themes pertaining to this legacy and grounded in critical race theory. Methods: During a preclinical psychiatry block, a second-year medical school class, divided into three groups of 50-60, attended the workshop, which comprised a 90-minute lecture, 30-minute break, and 60-minute small-group debriefing. Afterwards, participants completed an evaluation assessing self-reported knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and satisfaction with the workshop. Results: One hundred eighty students watched the lecture, 15 attended small-group debriefings, and 132 completed the survey. Seventy-six percent (100) reported receiving no, very little, or some prior exposure to the legacy of slavery in American medicine and psychiatry. Over 80% agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop made them more aware of this legacy and that the artwork, photographs, storytelling, and media (videos) facilitated learning. Qualitative feedback highlighted how the workshop improved students' knowledge about the legacy of slavery's presence in medicine and psychiatry. However, students criticized the lecture's scripted approach and requested more discussion, dialogue, interaction, and connection of this history to anti-racist action they could engage in now. Discussion: Though this workshop improved awareness of the legacy of slavery, students criticized its structure and approach. When teaching this legacy, medical schools should consider expanding content, ensuring opportunities for discussion in safe spaces, and connecting it to immediate anti-racist action.

Block-based teaching method based on cybernetics: a trial with 115 Chinese undergraduate medical students.

BACKGROUND: Class attendance is important for academic performance. Personal interactions between teachers and students are difficult in large classes; the number of medical undergraduate students in China ranges from dozens to over 100. It is important for teachers to control the teaching process to improve student attendance and participation. METHODS: Two classes of fourth-year undergraduate medical students, with each class comprising 115 students, participated in the study. One class, the trial group, was taught by the block-based teaching method based on cybernetics. This study was conducted with three of the courses in the Introduction to Oncology subject, and the trial group's courses included several blocks. Each block had a test paper that the students responded to immediately in class using the Internet. The teacher obtained feedback from the students when the rate of correct responses to block-test questions was less than 90%. The teacher adjusted the teaching in the following blocks according to the feedback information. The other class, the control group, was taught using the traditional lecture-based teaching method. RESULTS: The average attendance in the trial group was 104/115 (90.43%), and that in the control group was 83/115 (72.17%) (p = 0.0003). The teacher adjusted the teaching three times in the radiotherapy course owing to the complex ideas. After feedback, information on chemotherapy for the upper body was adjusted once, as was that on chemotherapy for the lower body, owing to students' attitudes. The average total score of the trial group was 86.06 ± 17.46 and that of the control group was 80.38 ± 6.97 (p = 0.041). Questionnaire I showed that the trial group students' attendance and participation were better than in the control group. Questionnaire II showed that the block-based teaching method based on cybernetics was approved by the students. CONCLUSIONS: The block-based teaching method based on cybernetics used in medical classes with large numbers of Chinese undergraduate students had positive effects.

Experiences with Racism Among Asian American Medical Students.

Importance: Asian American physicians have experienced a dual pandemic of racism and COVID-19 since 2020; understanding how racism has affected the learning environment of Asian American medical students is necessary to inform strategies to promoting a more inclusive medical school environment and a diverse and inclusive workforce. While prior research has explored the influence of anti-Asian racism on the experiences of Asian American health care workers, to our knowledge there are no studies investigating how racism has impacted the training experiences of Asian American medical students. Objective: To characterize how Asian American medical students have experienced anti-Asian racism in a medical school learning environment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study included online video interviews of Asian American medical students performed between July 29, 2021, and August 22, 2022. Eligible participants were recruited through the Asian Pacific American Medical Students Association and snowball sampling, and the sample represented a disaggregated population of Asian Americans and all 4 medical school years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The medical school experiences of Asian American medical students. Results: Among 25 participants, Asian ethnicities included 8 Chinese American (32%), 5 Korean American (20%), 5 Indian American (20%), 3 Vietnamese American (12%), 2 Filipino American (8%), and 1 (4%) each Nepalese, Pakistani, and Desi American; 16 (64%) were female. Participants described 5 major themes concerning their experience with discrimination: (1) invisibility as racial aggression (eg, "It took them the whole first year to be able to tell me apart from the other Asian guy"); (2) visibility and racial aggression ("It transitioned from these series of microaggressions that every Asian person felt to actual aggression"); (3) absence of the Asian American experience in medical school ("They're not going to mention Asian Americans at all"); (4) ignored while seeking support ("I don't know what it means to have this part of my identity supported"); and (5) envisioning the future. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, Asian American medical students reported feeling invisible within medical school while a target of anti-Asian racism. Addressing these unique challenges related to anti-Asian racism is necessary to promote a more inclusive medical school learning environment.

Perception and engagement in unprofessional behaviors of medical students and residents: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate perception and engagement in unprofessional behavior of residents and medical interns and explore the factors affecting their engagement in unprofessional behavior. METHOD: This study has an explanatory (quantitative-qualitative) mixed-method design. This study was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in 2022-2023. Participants, including residents and medical interns (n = 169), were entered by stratified random sampling. A survey was conducted in the quantitative step. A by an unprofessional behavior in clinical practice questionnaire (29 items) was used. For each behavior, the participants were asked to report whether they (a) participated in the behavior and (b) stated that the behavior Is unprofessional. In the qualitative step, 17 participants contributed. The qualitative data were collected by semi-structured interviews and analyzed according to the conventional content analysis approach Graneheim and Lundman introduced. RESULTS: The highest ratio of participants' engagement in unprofessional behavior was reported in 'failure to introduce yourself and nurses and physician assistants to the patient and his family' (n = 145 (85.8%)). The results showed the proportion of participants who engaged in unprofessional behavior more than those who did not participate. There were associations between participants' engagement in each behavior and their perception of that particular behavior as unprofessional. (p = 0.0001). In the following behaviors, although the participants acknowledged that these behaviors were unprofessional, those who participated in the unprofessional behaviors were significantly more than those who did not participate: failure to comply with clinic regulations and policy (p = 0.01), eating or drinking in the hallway of the clinic (p = 0.01), medical negligence in duties in the clinic setting (p = 0.04) and failure to perform duties in teamwork (p = 0.04). The qualitative results were explored in a theme entitled "internalized unprofessional culture," including three categories "encouraging contextual risk factors towards unprofessionalism," "suppressing of unprofessionalism reporting," and "disbelieving professionalism as a key responsibility." CONCLUSION: The results indicated that most participants engaged in unprofessional behaviors. The findings resulted from the internalized unprofessional culture in the workplace. The findings showed that engagement in unprofessional behaviors resulted from personal and systemic factors. The weakness of responsibility recognition and identity formation as a professional facilitated the engagement in unprofessional behaviors at the personal level. Furthermore, systemic factors including the contextual risk factors (such as deficiency of explicit and hidden curriculum), and the suppression of unprofessionalism reporting mechanism as a hidden factor played an important role in normalizing unprofessional behavior and promoting engagement in unprofessional behaviors among the participants. Recognition of the nature and extent of students' unprofessional behaviors facilitates educational discussion among teachers and students in this field. The results might assist to establish an assessment system and feedback mechanism to solve the problem of the "failure to fail" problem. In addition, these results provide medical educators insights into the development of professional courses that equip learners with adherence to professionalism and coping skills to deal with unprofessionalism in the healthcare system.

A pilot study to assess the impact of aboriginal and torres strait islander cultural humility webinars on australian medical school students.

BACKGROUND: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Curriculum Framework helps higher education providers to deliver safe and well-informed cultural humility education. However, there is currently a scarcity of evidence surrounding the efficacy and impact of cultural humility education. This study will use qualitative and quantitative research methods to evaluate learning outcomes from an Indigenous health educational webinar aimed at Australian medical students. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted following a group of Australian medical students who attended an educational Indigenous health (IH) culturally responsive webinar. Recruitment was conducted via the webinar hosts' social media pages. Quantitative methods involved sending one pre- and two post-webinar questionnaires to attendees. To assess participants' retention of information, one post-webinar survey was sent out immediately after the webinar and another three months after the webinar. These questionnaires were designed to reflect pre-determined learning objectives for the webinar. Qualitative methods involved a focus group discussion to identify common themes from participant feedback. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants were included in the final quantitative analysis. Most of the participants were clinical students between 18 and 24 years old who did not identify as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. There was a significant increase (p = 0.007) between pre-intervention (M = 0.35, SD = 0.26) and post-webinar knowledge for the learning outcome exploring the links between health and education (M = 047, SD = 0.25). No results were obtained from the three months post-intervention questionnaire. The qualitative analysis synthesized feedback from three participants and identified presenter delivery style as an important mediator of webinar effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in knowledge and understanding for the learning outcome that explored the links between health and education. We attribute this partly to the engaging and conversational delivery style of the webinar presenters. The importance of Indigenous facilitators that encourage reflective teaching should not be understated. Our results suggest that cultural humility webinars can have a positive impact on medical students' understanding of the Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health landscape. This pilot study warrants further research on a larger population.

Virtual Standardized Patients Versus Traditional Academic Training for Improving Clinical Competence Among Traditional Chinese Medicine Students: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The practical training course of internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine (PTC-IMTCM) is primarily based on traditional case teaching, which can be stressful for teachers. The use of virtual standardized patient (VSP) applications could be an alternative; however, there is limited evidence regarding their feasibility and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to build a VSP-TCM application according to the characteristics of PTC-IMTCM and the needs of students and to compare its efficacy with that of traditional teaching in improving TCM clinical competence among students. METHODS: A prequestionnaire investigation was conducted before the course, and a VSP-TCM system was developed based on the results of the questionnaire. A randomized controlled trial was then conducted between February 26, 2020, and August 20, 2021. A total of 84 medical students were included and were divided into 2 groups: an observation group, trained with VSP-TCM (n=42, 50%), and a control group, trained with traditional academic training (n=42, 50%). Formative and summative assessments were conducted to evaluate teaching effectiveness. After completing the course, the students were administered a questionnaire to self-assess their satisfaction with the course. A questionnaire was also administered to 15 teachers to uncover their perspectives on VSP-TCM. RESULTS: All participants completed the study. In the formative assessment, the VSP-TCM group performed better in medical interviewing ability (mean 7.19, SD 0.63, vs mean 6.83, SD 0.81; P=.04), clinical judgment (mean 6.48, SD 0.98, vs mean 5.86, SD 1.04; P=.006), and comprehensive ability (mean 6.71, SD 0.59, vs mean 6.40, SD 0.58; P=.02) than the control group. Similarly, in the summative evaluation, the VSP-TCM group performed better in the online systematic knowledge test (OSKT; mean 86.62, SD 2.71, vs mean 85.38, SD 2.62; P=.046), application of TCM technology (mean 87.86, SD 3.04, vs mean 86.19, SD 3.08; P=.02), TCM syndrome differentiation and therapeutic regimen (mean 90.93, SD 2.42, vs mean 89.60, SD 2.86; P=.03), and communication skills (mean 90.67, SD 4.52, vs mean 88.24, SD 4.56; P=.02) than the control group. There was no significant difference in medical writing between both groups (mean 75.07, SD 3.61, vs mean 75.71, SD 2.86; P=.37). The postcourse feedback questionnaire indicated that VSP-TCM can better enhance students' TCM thinking ability (n=39, 93%, vs n=37, 88%; P=.002), medical history collection (n=38, 90%, vs n=30, 72; P=.001), syndrome differentiation and treatment and critical thinking (n=38, 90%, vs n=37, 88%; P=.046), comprehensive clinical application ability (n=40, 95%, vs n=36, 86%; P=.009), interpersonal communication skills (n=36, 86%, vs n=28, 67%; P=.01), and autonomous learning ability (n=37, 88%, vs n=28, 67%; P=.01) than traditional academic training. Similarly, the teachers held a positive perspective on VSP-TCM. CONCLUSIONS: VSP-TCM enhances students' TCM clinical competence and dialectical thinking and improves their ability to work autonomously. Moreover, the VSP-TCM system is feasible, practical, and cost-effective and thus merits further promotion in TCM education.

Effects of the Education and Training Programme for Excellent Physicians in China on medical students' academic performance: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the Education and Training Programme for Excellent Physicians in China on medical students' academic performance. DESIGN: This study is a secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional survey of China Medical Student Survey (CMSS, 2021) and administrative data of the first-stage Medical Licensing Examination-the Standardised Competence Test for Clinical Medicine Undergraduates (the Test, 2021). CMSS used a stratified sampling process, with all undergraduate clinical medicine students participating voluntarily. SETTING: This programme is implemented at the class level within reformed medical schools, targeting undergraduate students in 5-year clinical medicine in China. The reformed medical schools run pilot classes and traditional classes simultaneously. The analytic sample was a total of 12 243 observations from pilot and traditional classes in 34 medical schools which implemented the reform across 19 provinces in China. METHODS: This study applied the propensity score matching method to estimate the effect of the reform by comparing the scores of the Test between pilot and traditional classes within the same medical schools. We further explored the potential mechanisms driving the effect from two facets of the Test: medical knowledge modules and cognitive levels. RESULTS: Pilot classes outperformed traditional classes by 0.104 SD on the Test (95% CI 0.037 to 0.171). Improvements were seen in basic medicine and clinical medicine modules (0.109 and 0.101 SD, respectively) and cognitive levels of memorisation and application (0.116 and 0.111 SD, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the reform had a significant positive impact on medical students' academic performance. Based on the components of this reform and the potential mechanism analysis of the two facets, this study indicates that curriculum reform in integrated learning and teaching methods reform in the adoption of problem-based learning may have been the possible drivers of this positive impact.

Embedding interpersonal stigma resistance into the medical curriculum: a focus group study of medical students.

BACKGROUND: Mental-health-related stigma among physicians towards people with mental illnesses remains a barrier to quality care, yet few curricula provide training with a proactive focus to reduce the potential negative impacts of stigma. The aim of our study was to explore medical students' perspectives on what areas of learning should be targeted (where stigma presents) and how they could be supported to prevent the formation of negative attitudes. METHODS: Six focus group discussions were conducted with second, third, and fourth-year postgraduate medical students (n = 34) enrolled at The University of Melbourne Medical School in September - October 2021. Transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In terms of where stigma presents, three main themes emerged - (1) through unpreparedness in dealing with patients with mental health conditions, (2) noticing mentors expressing stigma and (3) through the culture of medicine. The primary theme related to 'how best to support students to prevent negative attitudes from forming' was building stigma resistance to reduce the likelihood of perpetuating stigma towards patients with mental health conditions and therefore enhance patient care. The participants suggest six primary techniques to build stigma resistance, including (1) reflection, (2) skills building, (3) patient experiences, (4) examples and exemplars, (5) clinical application and (6) transforming structural barriers. We suggest these techniques combine to form the ReSPECT model for stigma resistance in the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: The ReSPECT model derived from our research could provide a blueprint for medical educators to integrate stigma resistance throughout the curriculum from year one to better equip medical students with the potential to reduce interpersonal stigma and perhaps self-stigma. Ultimately, building stigma resistance could enhance care towards patients with mental health conditions and hopefully improve patient outcomes.

Deliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students.

PURPOSE: Diagnostic errors are a large burden on patient safety and improving clinical reasoning (CR) education could contribute to reducing these errors. To this end, calls have been made to implement CR training as early as the first year of medical school. However, much is still unknown about pre-clerkship students' reasoning processes. The current study aimed to observe how pre-clerkship students use clinical information during the diagnostic process. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, pre-clerkship medical students completed 10-11 self-directed online simulated CR diagnostic cases. CR skills assessed included: creation of the differential diagnosis (Ddx), diagnostic justification (DxJ), ordering investigations, and identifying the most probable diagnosis. Student performances were compared to expert-created scorecards and students received detailed individualized formative feedback for every case. RESULTS: 121 of 133 (91%) first- and second-year medical students consented to the research project. Students scored much lower for DxJ compared to scores obtained for creation of the Ddx, ordering tests, and identifying the correct diagnosis, (30-48% lower, p < 0.001). Specifically, students underutilized physical exam data (p < 0.001) and underutilized data that decreased the probability of incorrect diagnoses (p < 0.001). We observed that DxJ scores increased 40% after 10-11 practice cases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We implemented deliberate practice with formative feedback for CR starting in the first year of medical school. Students underperformed in DxJ, particularly with analyzing the physical exam data and pertinent negative data. We observed significant improvement in DxJ performance with increased practice.

Assessing commitment to reflection: perceptions of medical students.

Background: While developing reflection skills is considered important by educators, the assessment of these skills is often associated with unintended negative consequences. In the context of a mandatory longitudinal course that aims to promote the development of reflection on professional identity, we assessed students' commitment to reflection. This study explores students' perception of this assessment by their mentor. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with twenty-one 1st and six 2nd year medical students. Thematic analysis was informed by Braun and Clarke's six-step approach. Results: We identified four main themes: 1- assessment as a motivator, 2- consequences on authenticity, 3- perception of inherent subjectivity, and 4 - relationship with the mentor. Conclusions: In the context of assessing reflection skills in future physicians, we observed that students -when assessed on the process of reflection- experienced high motivation but were ambivalent on the question of authenticity. The subjectivity of the assessment as well as the relationship with their mentor also raises questions. Nevertheless, this assessment approach for reflective skills appears to be promising in terms of limiting the negative consequences of assessment.

Contexte: Malgré l'importance que les éducateurs attribuent à l'acquisition de compétences de réflexion, l'évaluation de ces compétences entraîne souvent des conséquences négatives involontaires. Dans le cadre d'un cours longitudinal obligatoire visant à promouvoir le développement de la réflexion sur l'identité professionnelle, nous avons évalué l'engagement des étudiants à cultiver leurs compétences de réflexion. Cette étude explore leur perception de cette évaluation menée par leur mentor. Méthodes: Nous avons réalisé une étude qualitative descriptive à l'aide d'entretiens semi-structurés avec vingt-et-un étudiants en médecine de première année et six étudiants en médecine de deuxième année. Notre analyse thématique repose sur l'approche en six étapes de Braun et Clarke. Résultats: Nous avons identifié quatre thèmes principaux : 1 ­ l'évaluation comme facteur de motivation, 2 ­ les conséquences sur l'authenticité, 3 ­ la perception de la subjectivité inhérente, et 4 ­ la relation avec le mentor. Conclusions: Dans le contexte de l'évaluation des compétences de réflexion des futurs médecins, focalisée plus particulièrement sur le processus de réflexion, les étudiants se sont montrés très motivés, mais incertains quant à son authenticité. La subjectivité de l'évaluation et la relation avec leur mentor soulèvent également des interrogations. Néanmoins, cette approche d'évaluation des compétences réflexives semble prometteuse dans la mesure où elle permet de limiter les conséquences négatives de l'évaluation.

Teaching peer reviewing to medical students through authentic peer reviews: how to build the next generation of scholars.

Implication Statement: The peer review process is a critical step in producing sound scientific literature, traditionally conducted by professionals well-established in their field. It is uncommon for students, even at the graduate level, to contribute. Faculty created a novel course in which 18 medical students (nine per year) delivered peer reviews to the Canadian Medical Education Journal (CMEJ). The positive feedback and competency gained is described in the students' Letter to the Editor. While this course was initially created to benefit students, it has also helped to address a known deficit in peer reviewers. Énoncé des implications de la recherche: L'évaluation par les pairs est une étape essentielle de la production d'une littérature scientifique de bonne qualité. Traditionnellement faite par des professionnels confirmés dans leur domaine de compétences, il est rare que les étudiants, même ceux des cycles supérieurs, participent aux comités de lecture. Un cours novateur a permis à 18 étudiants en médecine (9 par année) de réaliser des évaluations par les pairs pour la Revue canadienne de l'éducation médicale (CMEJ). Les commentaires positifs et les compétences acquises sont décrits dans une lettre des étudiants à l'éditeur. Bien qu'à l'origine ce cours ait été créé pour profiter aux étudiants, il a également contribué à combler un déficit notoire de pairs évaluateurs.

If we assess, will they learn? Students' perspectives on the complexities of assessment-for-learning.

Introduction: Assessment can positively influence learning, however designing effective assessment-for-learning interventions has proved challenging. We implemented a mandatory assessment-for-learning system comprising a workplace-based assessment of non-medical expert competencies and a progress test in undergraduate medical education and evaluated its impact. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with year-3 and 4 medical students at McGill University to explore how the assessment system had influenced their learning in year 3. We conducted theory-informed thematic analysis of the data. Results: Eleven students participated, revealing that the assessment influenced learning through several mechanisms. Some required little student engagement (i.e., feed-up, test-enhanced learning, looking things up after an exam). Others required substantial engagement (e.g., studying for tests, selecting raters for quality feedback, using feedback). Student engagement was moderated by the perceived credibility of the system and of the costs and benefits of engagement. Credibility was shaped by students' goals-in-context: becoming a good doctor, contributing to the healthcare team, succeeding in assessments. Discussion: Our assessment system failed to engage students enough to leverage its full potential. We discuss the inherent flaws and external factors that hindered student engagement. Assessment designers should leverage easy-to-control mechanisms to support assessment-for-learning and anticipate significant collaborative work to modify learning cultures.

Introduction: L'évaluation peut influencer positivement l'apprentissage mais la conception de dispositifs d'évaluation pour l'apprentissage efficaces s'avère difficile. Nous avons implanté en formation prédoctorale un système obligatoire d'évaluation pour l'apprentissage comprenant une évaluation en milieu clinique des compétences transversales et un test de rendement progressif, puis évalué ses effets. Méthodes: Nous avons mené des entretiens semi-dirigés avec des étudiants en troisième et quatrième années de médecine à l'Université McGill pour explorer la manière dont le système d'évaluation avait influencé leur apprentissage au cours de la troisième année. Nous avons effectué une analyse thématique, informée par la théorie, des données. Résultats: Onze étudiants ont participé. Les résultats indiquent que l'évaluation a influencé leur apprentissage par le biais de plusieurs mécanismes différents. Certains d'entre eux nécessitaient une implication faible de la part de l'étudiant, comme l'identification des objectifs à atteindre (feed-up), l'apprentissage amélioré par les tests, la recherche d'informations après un examen. D'autres exigeaient une implication importante (par exemple, étudier pour les tests, sélectionner les évaluateurs pour obtenir une rétroaction de qualité, mettre à profit la rétroaction). L'implication des étudiants était modulée par leur perception des avantages et des inconvénients de s'impliquer, et de la crédibilité du système. Cette dernière était influencée par les objectifs-en-contexte des étudiants: devenir un bon médecin, contribuer à l'équipe soignante, réussir les épreuves d'évaluation. Discussion: Notre système d'évaluation n'a pas réussi à impliquer suffisamment les étudiants que pour réaliser son potentiel. Nous abordons les défauts inhérents au système ainsi que les facteurs externes qui ont entravé l'implication des apprenants. Pour implanter efficacement un dispositif d'évaluation pour l'apprentissage, les concepteurs d'évaluations devraient optimiser les mécanismes qui sont faciles à contrôler et être prêts à s'investir dans un important travail de collaboration pour changer les cultures d'apprentissage.

Do educational interventions improve prescribing skills of medical students compared to no additional learning? A systematic review.

Research suggests that medical students are not confident and may be ill-prepared to prescribe competently. Therefore, changes to standard education may be required to fortify medical student prescribing skills, confidence, and competence. However, specific education to write a safe and legal prescription is generally lacking. Furthermore, the term prescribe and the skill thereof is not clearly defined. This review compares additional education for medical students to no identified additional education or another educational modality on the skill of prescription writing. Secondary aims include review of education modalities, prescribing skill assessments, educator professional background, and timing of education within the medical curriculum. This systematic review was conducted and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Databases searched included: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Emcare (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed and Scopus. Search terms included: medical education, medical undergraduate, medical student, medical school, and prescriptions. The search was conducted in February 2023, and quantitative outcomes were reported. Of the 5197 citations identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies reported significant improvements in prescribing skills of medical students after additional educational intervention(s). Various educational modalities were implemented, including case-based teaching (n=3), patient-based teaching (n=1), tutorial-based teaching (n=2), didactic teaching (n=1), and mixed methods (n=6). There were no commonalities in the professional background of the educator; however, five studies used faculty members. There was no consensus on the best assessment type and time to implement prescription writing education during medical training. There are a range of interventions to educate and assess prescribing competencies of medical students. Despite heterogenous study designs, there is evidence of the superiority of additional prescription writing education versus no identified additional education to develop prescription writing skills. The introduction of formal teaching and standardised assessment of prescribing skills for medical students is recommended.