Acute coronary syndrome management in hemophiliacs: How to maintain balance?: A review.

To analyze existing literature and understand how to balance the minimization of bleeding risk and ensuring adequate anticoagulation during coronary intervention treatment and long-term postoperative anticoagulation in hemophilia patients during the perioperative period, in order to provide guidance for healthcare professionals in developing effective treatment plans. This narrative review will analyze existing studies, case reports, and clinical guidelines to determine the most effective strategies for managing acute coronary syndrome in hemophilia patients. When evaluating the literature, factors such as patient age, medical history, and severity of the condition will be considered. The current management guidelines for acute coronary syndrome in hemophilia patients are not based on systematic evaluation and mainly rely on expert opinions. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of existing literature and recommends coagulation factor replacement therapy before anticoagulation and intervention treatment, as well as personalized anticoagulation treatment during the postoperative period for better management of hemophilia patients with acute coronary syndrome. These recommendations can help healthcare professionals develop more effective treatment plans for hemophilia patients.

The National Hemophilia Foundation State of the Science Research Summit initiative: executive summary.

INTRODUCTION: The National Hemophilia Foundation State of the Science Research Summit initiative sought to unify research efforts in the US inherited bleeding disorders (BDs) community around key topics of importance to people living with inherited BDs, the lived experience experts. AREAS COVERED: This community-led and -informed project focused on six broad areas - hemophilia A or B; von Willebrand Disease (VWD), platelet dysfunctions and other mucocutaneous inherited BDs; ultra-rare inherited BDs; the unique challenges of people with the potential to menstruate with inherited BDs; diversity, equity and inclusion, health services research, and implementation science; and facilitating research in the inherited BD community through designing an optimizied research infrastructure, enabling resources and funding, and furthering workforce capabilities required to execute the research priorities. EXPERT OPINION: The work summarized here, and in the accompanying supplement manuscripts , has implications not only for the US population but for people globally who have inherited BDs. The information is equally relevant to people living with hemophilia, VWD, the spectrum of inherited platelet disorders, ultra-rare factor deficiencies, and all other inherited BDs as it is to the health care providers and researchers focused on the care and treatment of inherited BDs in the US and globally.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities to transform the care of people with hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Decades of research have transformed hemophilia from severely limiting children's lives to a manageable disorder compatible with a full, active life, for many in high-income countries. The direction of future research will determine whether exciting developments truly advance health equity for all people with hemophilia (PWH). National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network conducted extensive inclusive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Working group (WG) 1 of the NHF State of the Science Research Summit distilled the community-identified priorities for hemophilia A and B into concrete research questions and scored their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG1 defined 63 top priority research questions concerning arthropathy/pain/bone health, inhibitors, diagnostics, gene therapy, the pediatric to adult transition of care, disparities faced by the community, and cardiovascular disease. This research has the potential to empower PWH to thrive despite lifelong comorbidities and achieve new standards of wellbeing, including psychosocial. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative research and care delivery will be key to capitalizing on current and horizon treatments and harnessing technical advances to improve diagnostics and testing, to advance health equity for all PWH.

Hemophilia is the best known of the inherited bleeding disorders (BD). This is a rare condition that causes disproportionate bleeding, often into joints and vital organs. Factor replacement, injecting recombinant or plasma-based clotting factor products directly into the vein, became commonplace to control the disorder in the 1990s and 2000s. Prophylaxis, or injecting replacement factor every few days into people with hemophilia (PWH), has revolutionized patients' lives. In the last few years, other advances in new therapies have entered this space, such as non-factor replacement therapies and gene therapy. With many more research advances on the horizon, the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) initiated a State of the Science Research Summit in 2020. This event was attended by over 880 interested parties to help design an agenda of research priorities for inherited BDs for the next decade, based on community consultations. NHF formed multiple Working Groups (WG), each exploring a theme resulting from the community consultations, and presenting their results at the Summit. Led by 2 hematologists who manage and treat PWH daily, the 21-community member WG1 assigned to hemophilia A and B divided into 7 subgroups to identify and organize research priorities for different topic areas. The outcomes focused on prioritizing patients' needs, technological advances, and research in the areas of greatest potential for PWH and those who care for them. The results are a roadmap for the future execution of a research plan that truly serves the community.

[Acquired hemophilia A that developed after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and worsened following re-vaccination].

An 86-year-old Japanese male patient visited a nearby hospital with painful swelling in his left upper and lower limbs 35 days after the second dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. He was referred to our hematological department due to a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time and was urgently admitted. He was diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) based on factor VIII (FVIII) activity of 1.7%, FVIII inhibitor of 152.3 BU/ml, and FVIII-binding antibodies detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunosuppressive therapy with prednisolone (PSL) at 0.5 mg/kg/day was started owing to the risk of infection due to old age and poor activities of daily living. Hemostasis treatment with bypass hemostatic preparations (rFVIIa preparation, FVIIa/FX) was administered for each bleeding event, such as intramuscular and knee joint bleeding, resulting in good hemostatic effects. Coagulative complete remission was achieved on day 69 with PSL treatment; however, FVIII activity decreased with PSL tapering. AHA relapse with rectus abdominis muscle hematoma was observed after the third vaccination. This is the first Japanese report of AHA after COVID-19 vaccination and the world's first case, in which the presence of anti-FVIII-binding antibodies were observed.

[Acquired hemophilia A following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination].

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease characteized by bleeding symptoms caused by decreased factor VIII activity due to the appearance of inhibitors to factor VIII triggered by malignancy or collagen disease. An 86-year-old woman developed purpura on her extremities after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. This symptom subsided after a few days. After the second dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, purpura appeared again, and the patient was referred to our hospital Her APTT was remarkably prolonged to 110 seconds, and a cross-mixing test revealed an inhibitor pattern. Since FVIII activity was <1% and FVIII inhibitor was 51.6 BU, she was diagnosed with AHA. Prednisolone therapy was started, and coagulative complete remission was achieved. Because acquired hemophilia can develop after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, as in this case, it is critical to monitor the appearance of bleeding symptom.

Pain: a neglected symptom in hemophilia.

Repetitive bleeding attacks may cause joint pain and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia (PWH). Despite being a common symptom, pain is not a well-studied topic in this disease. The aim of this cross-sectional, observational study was to assess the frequency and intensity of pain and analyze the success rates ofpain treatment methods. Adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. The Multidimensional Hemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ) was used to assess pain. In addition to the MHPQ, demographic data were collected. Fifty adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. Thirty-one (62%) of the patients reported pain due to hemophilia in the last year. Twenty-six of them (81.2%) reported pain during bleeding attacks. The most successful pain coping strategy was clotting factor replacement. None of the participants used opioids or adjuvant analgesics. None of them used a physical therapy modality or interventional pain therapy method. While 67.6% of the patients were very dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their global pain treatment, only 16.1% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Patients with higher pain during bleeding episodes were more likely to continue their prophylaxis. There was no significant difference between plasma-derived or recombinant-derived factor prophylaxis in terms of pain complaints. Pain is a frequent and important symptom of hemophilia, but most of the patients are not treated sufficiently. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve the life quality of the patients. In addition to successful bleeding prophylaxis, administration of a proper and adequate analgesic regimen and combined physical therapy modalities may decrease pain intensity and prevent the development of arthropathy.

Acquired Hemophilia A: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of 42 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for acquired hemophilia A (AHA) results in remission within days to months in 60% to 80% of patients. However, little is known regarding the predictors of response. AIM: This study aimed to identify the factors that influence response to treatment. METHODS: The data of 42 patients with AHA from three hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All 42 AHA patients received IST; complete treatment data were available for 34 patients. The response rate was 60% among the 5/34 (14.7%) patients who received steroids alone, 70.8% among the 24/34 (70.6%) patients who received steroids plus cyclophosphamide, and 80% among the 5/34 (14.7%) patients who received steroids plus cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Overall, 29/34 (85.3%) patients achieved CR; 4/34 (13.8%) of them relapsed after a median time of 410 (21-1279) days. Adverse events occurred in 14/34 (41.2%) patients: 13/34 (38.2%) had infections and 1/34 (2.9%) developed pancytopenia. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, FVIII inhibitor titer ≥20 BU/mL was the only significant prognostic factor affecting time to CR. No variable had significant effect on OS. CONCLUSION: FVIII inhibitory antibody titer ≥20 BU/mL appears to be an important predictor of time to complete response in patients with acquired hemophilia A treated with immunosuppressive therapy.

Liver-related aspects of gene therapy for hemophilia: need for collaborations with hepatologists.

Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies hemophilia allow long-term transgene expression with reduced annual bleeding rates. Various liver-related aspects are involved in the different phases of gene therapy, such as assessment of liver health in the pretherapy period, patient selection and follow-up, maintenance of liver health after gene therapy, and management of potential short- and long-term adverse events. Increase in alanine aminotransferease is a common adverse event that requires rapid evaluation and an immunosuppressive approach. It is therefore important that hemophilia treaters and hepatologists collaborate at all stages of gene therapy to assess potential safety issues and ensure the long-term success of gene therapy. Special attention should be given to patients with not well-defined conditions, e.g. patients with some degree of liver fibrosis or fatty liver disease, patients with a history of hepatitis C and hepatitis B infection, patients with HIV infection, and patients taking medications that may affect liver function.

Pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with hemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a rare X-linked recessive inherited bleeding disorder caused by mutations of the genes encoding coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX). Patients with hemophilia (PWH) often have a high risk of osteoporosis and fractures that is usually ignored. Herein, we review the underlying mechanisms of osteoporosis and the increased risk of fractures and their treatment in patients with FVIII or FIX deficiency. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify original research articles, meta-analyses, and scientific reviews on the mechanisms or treatment of osteoporosis in PWH. RESULTS: The pathogenic mechanisms of osteoporosis in PWH are multifactorial and remain unclear. The available evidence shows that FVIII and FIX deficiency may directly affect bone metabolism by interfering with the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. Other potential mechanisms of osteoporosis in PWH include thrombin deficiency and the unloading and immobilization of bone, which will affect osteoblast and osteoclast activity by changing the cytokine profiles. The treatment of osteoporosis in PWH includes antiresorptive, anabolic, and dual-action drugs; weight-bearing exercise; fall prevention; and prophylactic coagulation factor replacement therapy. However, clinical studies of the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic agents in osteoporosis of PWH are urgently needed. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes recent progress in research on the pathogenesis of osteoporosis in PWH and provides insights into potential treatment for osteoporosis in PWH.

[NEW INNOVATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF HEMOPHILIA].

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a congenital bleeding disorder with a deficiency of coagulation factor 8 or 9 (hemophilia A or B, respectively) and a tendency for recurrent bleeding, especially into muscles and joints, which may cause orthopedic damage and necessitate joint replacement surgeries at a young age. In recent years, there has been a huge breakthrough in the treatment of hemophilia. Until recently, the only available therapy was based on repeated intravenous injection of factor concentrates (replacement therapy). Nowadays, new therapeutic options are being developed, some already registered and approved and others are still in clinical studies. The new molecules either enhance the coagulation system or inhibit coagulation inhibitors, promoting faster and improved clot formation, and are administered subcutaneously. These developments have had an enormous impact on the patients' quality of life. In the last decade, the option of complete (genetic) cure of the disease has been explored for both hemophilia A and hemophilia B, and multiple clinical gene therapy trials are currently being conducted. In this review, we discuss the novel therapies currently available for hemophilia. We will elaborate on extended half-life long acting factor concentrates, subcutaneous non-replacement therapies and gene therapy.

CD14+/CD31+ monocytes expanded by UM171 correct hemophilia A in zebrafish upon lentiviral gene transfer of factor VIII.

Emerging gene therapy clinical trials test the correction of hemophilia A (HA) by replacing factor VIII (FVIII) in autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Although it is known that platelets, monocyte/macrophages, and mesenchymal stromal cells can secrete transgenic FVIII, a systematic examination of blood lineages as extrahepatic sources of FVIII, to our knowledge, has not yet been performed. In this study, we sought to provide a comprehensive map of native and lentivirus-based transgenic FVIII production from HSC stage to mature blood cells, through a flow cytometry analysis. In addition, we generated a model of transient HA in zebrafish based on antisense RNA, to assess the corrective potential of the FVIII-transduced HSCs. We discovered that FVIII production begins at the CD34+ progenitor stage after cytokine stimulation in culture. Among all mature white blood cells, monocytes are the largest producers of native FVIII and can maintain protein overexpression during differentiation from HSCs when transduced by a FVIII lentiviral vector. Moreover, the addition of the HSC self-renewal agonist UM171 to CD34+ cells during transduction expanded a subpopulation of CD14+/CD31+ monocytes with excellent ability to carry the FVIII transgene, allowing the correction of HA phenotype in zebrafish. Finally, the HA zebrafish model showed that f8 RNA is predominantly localized in the hematopoietic system at the larval stage, which indicates a potential contributory role of FVIII in hematopoiesis that warrants further investigation. We believe that this study may be of broad interest to hematologists and researchers striving to advance knowledge and permanent treatments for patients with HA.

Effectiveness of therapeutic exercise and cognitive-behavioural therapy combined protocol on functionality, pain and joint health in people with haemophilia: Secondary analysis of a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Haemophilic arthropathy is one of the main causes of morbidity in people with haemophilia (PWH), inducing pain and reduced functionality. Therefore, PWH are complex patients and must be approached from a multidisciplinary perspective. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic exercise and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) combined protocol on functionality, pain, and joint health of PWH, arthropathy and chronic pain. Treatment satisfaction was also evaluated. METHODS: A single-blinded clinical trial with 21 PWH in prophylactic regimen was carried out. Participants were divided into an experimental group (EG, n = 11) and a control group (CG, n = 10). The EG underwent a 4-month programme of home-based therapeutic exercise plus CBT, whilst CG performed their daily activities. Patients were evaluated at baseline, post-intervention and after 12 additional weeks. Measures of functionality (Haemophilia Activities List, Timed Up and Go Test, 2-Minutes-Walking-Test and Sit-to-Stand Test), pain (PainDETECT and Visual Analogue Scale) and joint health (Haemophilia Joint Health Score) were taken. Related dimensions of the A36 Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire were calculated. Effects were calculated using a two-factor ANOVA. RESULTS: The EG showed significant improvements in function (p < .001), pain (p < .001), joint damage (p = .006), and satisfaction with the treatment (p = .006) dimensions of the A36 Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire, as well as in pain measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (p = .008) and PainDETECT (p = .035). CONCLUSIONS: The combined physiotherapy and CBT protocol showed a partial improvement in functionality, pain and joint health of PWH, arthropathy and chronic pain. In addition, participants were satisfied with the treatment.

Therapeutic options for hemarthrosis in severe hemophilic patients / Opções terapêuticas para as hemartroses em pacientes hemofílicos graves

Introduction: Hemophilia A and B are rare congenital X-linked recessive diseases caused by lack or deficiency of the coagulation factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The primary therapeutic approach is to replace the deficient coagulation factor, which can be achieved with factors derived from human plasma or recombinants. However, despite having a therapeutic approach, most severe cases are symptomatic and may have complications, mainly in the muscles and joints. One example of such disorder is hemarthrosis. This manifestation tends to affect mainly the knee, ankle, or elbow joints in about 80% of cases. Objective: to describe the primary forms of treatment for joint bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia. Methods: This is a qualitative research of the integrative review type meant to identify productions on topics associated with hemarthrosis and severe hemophilia. The articles were searched through the databases PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) and Virtual Health Library (BVS) with the following search descriptors: "hemarthrosis and hemophilia"; "joint diseases and Hemophilia" and corresponding terms in Portuguese. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) scientific articles b) available in full-text c) studies available in Portuguese, English, or Spanish d) randomized clinical trials e) articles published between 2016 and 2021 f) articles containing hemarthrosis caused by severe hemophilia. As exclusion criteria, texts that had no relation to the theme, did not answer the guiding question, other types of articles that did not include randomized clinical trials and/or presented duplicates were discarded. Results: In total, 42 articles were found in the selected databases; eight were duplicated, and 25 were excluded for not being randomized clinical trials or because they did not contemplate the theme. After careful reading, nine articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. Of the eligible studies, one reported factor replacement, and eight reported physiotherapeutic treatment. Conclusion:Factor replacement for hemophilic patients is essential and, based on the information obtained, early replacement is ben-eficial for the patient to avoid joint complications. Prophylaxis is indicated in severe hemophilia and its main objective is to prevent recurrent hemarthrosis, which can cause permanent functional deformities. Some physiotherapeutic interventions are indicated to prevent joint damage in severe hemophilic patients. The findings show diversity in the physical therapy modalities employed. The complete prevention of joint damage is still a challenge. A combination of treatments and a multi-disciplinary team follow-up is necessary to ensure health and quality of life of patients. (AU)

Introdução: As hemofilias A e B são doenças congênitas raras, recessivas ligadas ao X, causadas por falta ou deficiência de fator de coagulação VIII (FVIII) ou IX (FIX), respectivamente. A terapêutica tem como conduta principal a reposição do fator de coagulação deficiente, podendo ser feita com fatores derivados de plasma humano ou recombinantes. Porém, apesar de possuir uma terapêutica, grande parte dos casos graves são sintomáticos e podem ter complicações, na sua maioria, nos músculos e nas articulações. Uma dessas desordens é a hemartrose. Essa manifestação tende a acometer principalmente articulações do joelho, tornozelo ou cotovelo em cerca de 80% dos casos. Objetivo: descrever as principais formas de tra-tamento para sangramento articular em pacientes com hemofilia grave. Método: Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa do tipo revisão integrativa para identificação de produções sobre temas associados a hemartrose e hemofilia grave. A busca dos artigos foi através das bases de dados PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) com os seguintes descritores de busca: "hemarthrosis and hemophilia"; "joint diseases and hemophilia" e termos correspondentes no português. Os critérios de inclusão foram os seguintes: a) artigos b) estar disponível em texto completo c) estudos disponíveis nos idiomas português, inglês ou espanhol d) ensaios clínicos randomizados e) artigos publicados entre 2016 e 2021 f) artigos que contemplem hemartrose por hemofilia grave. Resultados: No total, foram encontrados 42 artigos nas bases de dados selecionadas; oito estavam duplicados e 25 foram excluídos por não serem ensaios clínicos randomizados ou por não contemplarem a temática. Após leitura cuidadosa, foram identificados 9 artigos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Dos trabalhos elegíveis, um relatou sobre reposição de fator e oito artigos relataram sobre tratamento fisioterapêutico. Conclusão: A reposição de fatores para pacientes hemofílicos é essencial e, com base nas informações obtidas, a reposição precoce é benéfica para o paciente, evitando complicações articulares. A profilaxia está indicada na hemofilia grave e seu principal objetivo é prevenir a hemartrose recorrente, que pode causar deformidades funcionais permanentes. Algumas intervenções fisioterapêuticas são indicadas para prevenir danos articulares em pacientes hemofílicos graves. Os achados mostram diversidade nas modalidades de fisioterapia empregadas. A prevenção total dos danos articulares ainda é um desafio. É necessária uma combinação de tratamentos e acompanhamento por equipe multi-disciplinar de forma a garantir a saúde e qualidade de vida dos pacientes. (AU)

Gene therapy for hemophilia.

The cloning of the factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) genes in the 1980s has led to a succession of clinical advances starting with the advent of molecular diagnostic for hemophilia, followed by the development of recombinant clotting factor replacement therapy. Now gene therapy beckons on the back of decades of research that has brought us to the final stages of the approval of 2 products in Europe and United States, thus heralding a new era in the treatment of the hemophilias. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec, the first gene therapy for treatment of hemophilia A, has been granted conditional marketing authorization in Europe. Another approach (etranacogene dezaparvovec, AMT-061) for hemophilia B is also under review by regulators. There are several other gene therapy approaches in earlier stages of development. These approaches entail a one-off infusion of a genetically modified adeno-associated virus (AAV) engineered to deliver either the FVIII or FIX gene to the liver, leading to the continuous endogenous synthesis and secretion of the missing coagulation factor into the circulation by the hepatocytes, thus preventing or reducing bleeding episodes. Ongoing observations show sustained clinical benefit of gene therapy for >5 years following a single administration of an AAV vector without long-lasting or late toxicities. An asymptomatic, self-limiting, immune-mediated rise in alanine aminotransferase is commonly observed within the first 12 months after gene transfer that has the potential to eliminate the transduced hepatocytes in the absence of treatment with immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids. The current state of this exciting and rapidly evolving field, as well as the challenges that need to be overcome for the widespread adaptation of this new treatment paradigm, is the subject of this review.