Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 6.137
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 381(12): 1103-1113, 2019 09 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials evaluating the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan, we randomly assigned 2236 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) more than 1 year earlier or who had angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease not requiring revascularization to receive monotherapy with rivaroxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause; this end point was analyzed for noninferiority with a noninferiority margin of 1.46. The primary safety end point was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; this end point was analyzed for superiority. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early because of increased mortality in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for the primary efficacy end point, with event rates of 4.14% and 5.75% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for the primary safety end point, with event rates of 1.62% and 2.76% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P = 0.01 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS: As antithrombotic therapy, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. (Funded by the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.).


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos
2.
N Engl J Med ; 381(14): 1309-1320, 2019 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475798

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus who have not had a myocardial infarction or stroke are at high risk for cardiovascular events. Whether adding ticagrelor to aspirin improves outcomes in this population is unclear. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who were 50 years of age or older and who had stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus to receive either ticagrelor plus aspirin or placebo plus aspirin. Patients with previous myocardial infarction or stroke were excluded. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding as defined by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria. RESULTS: A total of 19,220 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 39.9 months. Permanent treatment discontinuation was more frequent with ticagrelor than placebo (34.5% vs. 25.4%). The incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events (the primary efficacy outcome) was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the placebo group (7.7% vs. 8.5%; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 0.99; P = 0.04), whereas the incidence of TIMI major bleeding was higher (2.2% vs. 1.0%; hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.82 to 2.94; P<0.001), as was the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (0.7% vs. 0.5%; hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.48; P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.1%; hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 4.15; P = 0.11). The incidence of an exploratory composite outcome of irreversible harm (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, fatal bleeding, or intracranial hemorrhage) was similar in the ticagrelor group and the placebo group (10.1% vs. 10.8%; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke, those who received ticagrelor plus aspirin had a lower incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events but a higher incidence of major bleeding than those who received placebo plus aspirin. (Funded by AstraZeneca; THEMIS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01991795.).


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
N Engl J Med ; 381(16): 1524-1534, 2019 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31475799

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4018 patients underwent randomization. A primary end-point event occurred in 184 of 2012 patients (9.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 137 of 2006 patients (6.9%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.70; P = 0.006). The respective incidences of the individual components of the primary end point in the ticagrelor group and the prasugrel group were as follows: death, 4.5% and 3.7%; myocardial infarction, 4.8% and 3.0%; and stroke, 1.1% and 1.0%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.3% of patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1.0% of patients assigned to prasugrel, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Major bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale) was observed in 5.4% of patients in the ticagrelor group and in 4.8% of patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.51; P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was significantly lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München; ISAR-REACT 5 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01944800.).


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Trombose Coronária/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efeitos adversos , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos
4.
EuroIntervention ; 15(6): e551-e557, 2019 08 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31186218

RESUMO

AIMS: Early mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is relatively rare. Current risk prediction models for this event are outdated. We sought to derive a 30-day mortality risk score after PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: The score was derived from a pooled database of 21 randomised clinical trials using a logistic regression model incorporating clinical and angiographic variables. The score was validated in a separate unrestricted study population, the Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy With Drug Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) registry. Of 32,882 eligible patients, 75% had data for all 19 variables used for score derivation. The independent predictors of 30-day mortality were age, presentation with ACS, diabetes mellitus, use of first-generation drug-eluting stents, left main or left anterior descending artery lesion, prior myocardial infarction (MI), and suboptimal flow in the artery before or after PCI. The median [interquartile range] score in the derivation cohort was 5 [3, 6] and overall mortality was 0.49%, ranging from 0.08% to 1.64% with scores of 0-16. The 30-day mortality rate was approximately tenfold higher in patients with a score at or above versus below the median of 5 (0.86% versus 0.08%, p<0.0001). Discrimination in both cohorts was very good (C statistic=0.848 and 0.828, respectively), and calibration was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: A novel risk score incorporating eight readily available clinical and angiographic variables had high discrimination for 30-day death after PCI across a wide range of clinical scenarios.


Assuntos
Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Gastroenterology ; 157(3): 682-691.e2, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152740

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective at treating acid-related disorders. These drugs are well tolerated in the short term, but long-term treatment was associated with adverse events in observational studies. We aimed to confirm these findings in an adequately powered randomized trial. METHODS: We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole (40 mg daily, n = 8791) or placebo (n = 8807). Participants were also randomly assigned to groups that received rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) with aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg) alone. We collected data on development of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, other enteric infections, fractures, gastric atrophy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, dementia, cardiovascular disease, cancer, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality every 6 months. Patients were followed up for a median of 3.01 years, with 53,152 patient-years of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the pantoprazole and placebo groups in safety events except for enteric infections (1.4% vs 1.0% in the placebo group; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.75). For all other safety outcomes, proportions were similar between groups except for C difficile infection, which was approximately twice as common in the pantoprazole vs the placebo group, although there were only 13 events, so this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In a large placebo-controlled randomized trial, we found that pantoprazole is not associated with any adverse event when used for 3 years, with the possible exception of an increased risk of enteric infections. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01776424.


Assuntos
Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Pantoprazol/administração & dosagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/induzido quimicamente , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pantoprazol/efeitos adversos , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
BMJ ; 365: l2222, 2019 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253632

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard term (12 months) or long term (>12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus short term (<6 months) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies published between June 1983 and April 2018 from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister.eu. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials comparing two of the three durations of DAPT (short term, standard term, and long term) after PCI with DES were included. The primary study outcomes were cardiac or non-cardiac death, all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding events. RESULTS: 17 studies (n=46 864) were included. Compared with short term DAPT, network meta-analysis showed that long term DAPT resulted in higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.49) and non-cardiac death (1.63, 1.03 to 2.59); standard term DAPT was associated with higher rates of any bleeding (1.39, 1.01 to 1.92). No noticeable difference was observed in other primary endpoints. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the risks of non-cardiac death and bleeding were further increased for ≥18 months of DAPT compared with short term or standard term DAPT. In the subgroup analysis, long term DAPT led to higher all cause mortality than short term DAPT in patients implanted with newer-generation DES (1.99, 1.04 to 3.81); short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety to standard term DAPT with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation and newer-generation DES placement. The heterogeneity of pooled trials was low, providing more confidence in the interpretation of results. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with all clinical presentations, compared with short term DAPT (clopidogrel), long term DAPT led to higher rates of major bleeding and non-cardiac death, and standard term DAPT was associated with an increased risk of any bleeding. For patients with ACS, short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety with standard term DAPT. For patients implanted with newer-generation DES, long term DAPT resulted in more all cause mortality than short term DAPT. Although the optimal duration of DAPT should take personal ischaemic and bleeding risks into account, this study suggested short term DAPT could be considered for most patients after PCI with DES, combining evidence from both direct and indirect comparisons. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018099519.


Assuntos
Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Stents Farmacológicos/normas , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Clopidogrel/administração & dosagem , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/mortalidade
7.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(8): 2302-2310, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31174954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aggregation of platelets is a trigger for additional development of larger thrombi. This study aimed to identify factors that may affect platelet aggregability and their role in clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 352) who were transferred within 24 hours after its onset were enrolled. Peripheral venous blood was sampled to measure platelet aggregability and other parameters. RESULTS: Mean values of spontaneous small-sized platelet aggregates and collagen- or adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced large-sized aggregates were elevated in acute ischemic stroke. In atherothrombotic stroke (n = 178), collagen and ADP-induced large-sized aggregates were positively correlated with HbA1c, respectively. High incidence of the modified Rankin Scales (mRS) 5-6 at discharge was associated with diabetes complication (odds ratio [OR] 8.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-57.56). The proportion of patients who were functionally independent (the mRS 0-2) at discharge was lower in the middle tertile of collagen and ADP-induced large-sized aggregates than their low tertile (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.09-5.58; OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.05-5.59, respectively). Prestroke administration of aspirin recovered the proportion of independence at discharge (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06-0.99), and ameliorated incidence of the mRS 5-6. On logistic regression analysis, diabetes, HbA1c, collagen-induced large-sized aggregates, and prestroke administration of aspirin remained independent predictors of clinical outcomes in atherothrombotic stroke. In cardioembolic and lacunar stroke, no relations with clinical outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: High plasma level of HbA1c is involved in enhanced platelet aggregability in acute atherothrombotic stroke patients, and prestroke administration of aspirin may be beneficial to clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Hemoglobina A Glicada/metabolismo , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Função Plaquetária/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/sangue , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/sangue , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima
8.
J Clin Neurosci ; 66: 45-50, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (ET) has been proved as safety and effective in acute ischemic stroke. However, early reocclusion is an inevitable complication following ET. There is uncertainty effect of early antiplatelet therapy on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment. METHODS: We searched major databases for articles published from 2011 to 2019 in the present study. Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Efficacy outcomes were recanalization rate and follow-up functional outcome. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata Software Package 14.0 were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1251 patients were included. A total of 451 (36.1%) patients were administrated by antiplatelet agent following ET. Meta-analysis suggested that early antiplatelet did not increase the risk for ICH (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.56-2.37; P = 0.70), sICH (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.79-2.09; P = 0.31) and mortality (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.45-1.12; P = 0.14). There was no association between antiplatelet therapy and recanalization rate (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.73-1.46; P = 0.30) or functional outcome (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.55-1.69; P = 0.90). Sensitivity analysis indicated tirofiban did not associated with any ICH and mortality, nor improve the recanalization rate and functional outcome in patients receiving ET or mechanical thrombectomy (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early antiplatelet therapy may be safe in acute ischemic stroke patients, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Tirofibana/efeitos adversos , Tirofibana/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Clin Neurosci ; 66: 33-37, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31160199

RESUMO

Antiplatelet therapy at the time of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) may increase risk for hemorrhage expansion and mortality. Current guidelines recommend considering a single dose of desmopressin in sICH associated with cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors or adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors. Adult subjects with sICH and concomitant antiplatelet therapy admitted to a large, tertiary care center were included. We sought to compare the risk of hematoma expansion in patients that received desmopressin for antiplatelet reversal in the setting of sICH to similar patients that did not receive desmopressin. The primary outcomes were the incidence of relative and absolute hematoma expansion. In total, 71 patients (29 received desmopressin, 42 did not receive desmopressin) were analyzed. All patients in the desmopressin group received a 0.3 mcg/kg intravenous dose prior to hematoma expansion assessment. Relative hematoma expansion occurred in 5/29 (17%) with desmopressin compared to 11/42 (26%) without desmopressin (OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.18-1.92]). Absolute hematoma expansion occurred in 9/29 (30%) with desmopressin compared to 12/42 (28%) without desmopressin (OR 1.13 [95% CI 0.40-3.16]). Multiple logistic regression controlling for significant covariates did not reveal a significant effect of desmopressin on relative or absolute hematoma expansion (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.18-2.43] and OR 1.55 [0.48-4.99], respectively). We failed to find evidence that desmopressin administration for antiplatelet reversal in sICH reduces the incidence of hematoma expansion. Larger studies, focusing on the early phase of sICH, are needed to characterize the clinical efficacy and safety of desmopressin for antiplatelet reversal before widespread implementation.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Desamino Arginina Vasopressina/administração & dosagem , Hematoma/tratamento farmacológico , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Hemostáticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hemorragia Cerebral/induzido quimicamente , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hematoma/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
JAMA ; 321(24): 2414-2427, 2019 06 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237644

RESUMO

Importance: Very short mandatory dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent may be an attractive option. Objective: To test the hypothesis of noninferiority of 1 month of DAPT compared with standard 12 months of DAPT for a composite end point of cardiovascular and bleeding events. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolling 3045 patients who underwent PCI at 90 hospitals in Japan from December 2015 through December 2017. Final 1-year clinical follow-up was completed in January 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized either to 1 month of DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (n=1523) or to 12 months of DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel (n=1522). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or major or minor bleeding at 12 months, with a relative noninferiority margin of 50%. The major secondary cardiovascular end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or definite stent thrombosis and the major secondary bleeding end point was major or minor bleeding. Results: Among 3045 patients randomized, 36 withdrew consent; of 3009 remaining, 2974 (99%) completed the trial. One-month DAPT was both noninferior and superior to 12-month DAPT for the primary end point, occurring in 2.36% with 1-month DAPT and 3.70% with 12-month DAPT (absolute difference, -1.34% [95% CI, -2.57% to -0.11%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98]), meeting criteria for noninferiority (P < .001) and for superiority (P = .04). The major secondary cardiovascular end point occurred in 1.96% with 1-month DAPT and 2.51% with 12-month DAPT (absolute difference, -0.55% [95% CI, -1.62% to 0.52%]; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.49-1.29]), meeting criteria for noninferiority (P = .005) but not for superiority (P = .34). The major secondary bleeding end point occurred in 0.41% with 1-month DAPT and 1.54% with 12-month DAPT (absolute difference, -1.13% [95% CI, -1.84% to -0.42%]; HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.64]; P = .004 for superiority). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing PCI, 1 month of DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with 12 months of DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel, resulted in a significantly lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events, meeting criteria for both noninferiority and superiority. These findings suggest that a shorter duration of DAPT may provide benefit, although given study limitations, additional research is needed in other populations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02619760.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico
11.
JAMA ; 321(24): 2428-2437, 2019 06 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237645

RESUMO

Importance: Data on P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are limited. Objective: To determine whether P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT is noninferior to 12 months of DAPT in patients undergoing PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SMART-CHOICE trial was an open-label, noninferiority, randomized study that was conducted in 33 hospitals in Korea and included 2993 patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents. Enrollment began March 18, 2014, and follow-up was completed July 19, 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for 3 months and thereafter P2Y12 inhibitor alone (n = 1495) or DAPT for 12 months (n = 1498). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 12 months after the index procedure. Secondary end points included the components of the primary end point and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5. The noninferiority margin was 1.8%. Results: Among 2993 patients who were randomized (mean age, 64 years; 795 women [26.6%]), 2912 (97.3%) completed the trial. Adherence to the study protocol was 79.3% of the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group and 95.2% of the DAPT group. At 12 months, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 42 patients in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group and in 36 patients in the DAPT group (2.9% vs 2.5%; difference, 0.4% [1-sided 95% CI, -∞% to 1.3%]; P = .007 for noninferiority). There were no significant differences in all-cause death (21 [1.4%] vs 18 [1.2%]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.63-2.21; P = .61), myocardial infarction (11 [0.8%] vs 17 [1.2%]; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.40; P = .28), or stroke (11 [0.8%] vs 5 [0.3%]; HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 0.78-6.43; P = .14) between the 2 groups. The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group than in the DAPT group (2.0% vs 3.4%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT compared with prolonged DAPT resulted in noninferior rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Because of limitations in the study population and adherence, further research is needed in other populations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02079194.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efeitos adversos
13.
Minerva Med ; 110(5): 410-418, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31081301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) (stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD] or coronary artery disease [CAD]) are at high risk of serious events and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend new antiplatelet drugs (NADs) for high cardiovascular risk patients with ACS; however, these drugs are underused in different scenarios. METHODS: This study included 1717 ACS patients from 3 tertiary hospitals. Of them, 641 (37.33%) suffered from previous CVD: 149 patients with stroke, 154 patients with PAD and 541 patients with CAD. Bleeding, mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year of follow-up after hospital discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: NADs administration during hospital stay and at discharge was less frequent in patients with previous CVDs (P<0.001, for both). Cox analysis in this cohort of patients showed that clopidogrel prescription at discharge was independently associated with MACEs (HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 1.03-2.45]; P=0.036) and with death (HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.00-3.98]; P=0.049) in multivariate analysis. More specifically, when ticagrelor prescription at discharge was compared with clopidogrel, a significant death reduction was found in both, the univariate and the multivariate Cox analysis (HR: 4.54 [95% CI: 2.26-9.13]; P<0.001 and HR: 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.90]; P=0.021, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: New antiplatelet drugs, especially ticagrelor, showed lower rates of mortality in patients with CVD without differences for bleeding. Despite the recommendations of current clinical guidelines for high risk patients with ACS, the use of NADs is very low in "real-life" patients with previous CVD.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Assistência ao Convalescente , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espanha , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico
14.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 144(10): 683-689, 2019 05.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31083738

RESUMO

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is a frequent and chronic vascular disorder mostly affecting the lower limbs and caused by fibrous plaques in arteries that can result in stenoses and thrombi. Patients suffering from this condition show a high risk for cardiovascular complications of the complete arterial vascular system, especially post-procedural. Thus, there is a need to optimize anti-thrombotic therapy. Data on multiple antiplatelet aggregation therapy including new drug classes are expected in the coming years. In addition, recent studies showed that direct oral anticoagulation provided clinical advantages combined with a reasonable safety profile. Management of risk factors such as overweight and nicotine and correction of metabolic disorders are not to be ignored and the background to further therapy. All treating physicians should be aware of these aspects to guarantee an optimal care and motivation of their patients.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Doença Arterial Periférica , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Doença Arterial Periférica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Riscos
15.
Internist (Berl) ; 60(6): 597-607, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31076795

RESUMO

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common and sometimes life-threatening event in older people. There is often a drug-induced cause. Drugs that can lead to gastrointestinal bleeding include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like diclofenac and ibuprofen, platelet inhibitors such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASS), clopidogrel and prasugrel, as well as anticoagulants like vitamin-K antagonists, heparin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAKs). Combination antiplatelet therapy or combined medication with platelet inhibitor and anticoagulants increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to monotherapy. Primary and secondary prevention options include Helicobacter pylori eradication and co-medication with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI).


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Risco
16.
Lancet ; 393(10191): 2613-2623, 2019 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. METHODS: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29-146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0- 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25-1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39-1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65-1·60]; p=0·92). INTERPRETATION: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Doenças Vasculares/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hemorragia Cerebral/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
17.
N Engl J Med ; 380(20): 1906-1917, 2019 05 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31091372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cryptogenic strokes constitute 20 to 30% of ischemic strokes, and most cryptogenic strokes are considered to be embolic and of undetermined source. An earlier randomized trial showed that rivaroxaban is no more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke after a presumed embolic stroke from an undetermined source. Whether dabigatran would be effective in preventing recurrent strokes after this type of stroke was unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of dabigatran at a dose of 150 mg or 110 mg twice daily as compared with aspirin at a dose of 100 mg once daily in patients who had had an embolic stroke of undetermined source. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 5390 patients were enrolled at 564 sites and were randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2695 patients) or aspirin (2695 patients). During a median follow-up of 19 months, recurrent strokes occurred in 177 patients (6.6%) in the dabigatran group (4.1% per year) and in 207 patients (7.7%) in the aspirin group (4.8% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.03; P = 0.10). Ischemic strokes occurred in 172 patients (4.0% per year) and 203 patients (4.7% per year), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03). Major bleeding occurred in 77 patients (1.7% per year) in the dabigatran group and in 64 patients (1.4% per year) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.66). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 70 patients (1.6% per year) and 41 patients (0.9% per year), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a recent history of embolic stroke of undetermined source, dabigatran was not superior to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke. The incidence of major bleeding was not greater in the dabigatran group than in the aspirin group, but there were more clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events in the dabigatran group. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; RE-SPECT ESUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02239120.).


Assuntos
Antitrombinas/administração & dosagem , Dabigatrana/administração & dosagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Antitrombinas/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Incidência , Embolia Intracraniana/tratamento farmacológico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Prevenção Secundária , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade
18.
Int Heart J ; 60(3): 546-553, 2019 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31105152

RESUMO

Antithrombotic strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain challenging. This study aims to explore the best antithrombotic strategy for AF patients after PCI based on a network meta-analysis. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018093928). The PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify clinical trials concerning antithrombotic therapy for AF patients with PCI from inception to April 2018. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare clinical outcomes of different antithrombotic therapy. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. Fifteen studies including 16,382 patients were identified with follow-up ranging from 3 to 12 months. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) plus P2Y12 inhibitor ranked first with a reduced risk of major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.75) but with no significant difference compared with VKA plus single platelet therapy (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.62-1.16). Similar thrombotic events were evident among these groups. Subgroup analysis showed that VKA plus aspirin exhibited a similar risk of major bleeding compared with VKA plus clopidogrel (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.73-1.23) but was associated with increased risks of ischaemic stroke (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.33-3.32) and all-cause death (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.15-2.74) versus VKA plus clopidogrel. In AF patients undergoing PCI, NOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor and VKA plus clopidogrel, but not VKA plus aspirin, were associated with reduced risk of major bleeding compared with the recommended VKA-based triple therapy, while thrombotic events were similar among these treatments.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores
19.
EuroIntervention ; 15(6): e513-e521, 2019 08 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31012853

RESUMO

AIMS: A guided de-escalation of P2Y12 inhibitor treatment is considered an alternative treatment strategy in ACS patients undergoing PCI. However, the safety and efficacy of this strategy may differ in diabetic vs non-diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of platelet function testing (PFT)-guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS patients with and without diabetes mellitus. METHODS AND RESULTS: The TROPICAL-ACS trial randomised 2,610 biomarker-positive ACS patients 1:1 to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation. The association and interaction of diabetes on clinical endpoints across treatment groups and on platelet reactivity was investigated. In diabetic patients (n=527, 20.2%), the overall event rates were high and the one-year incidence of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding ≥grade 2) did not differ between guided de-escalation and control group patients (12.5% vs 10.8%; HR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.71-1.93, p=0.55). In non-diabetic patients (n=2,083, 79.8%), the one-year incidence of the primary endpoint was lower in the guided de-escalation vs control group (6.1% vs 8.5%; HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p=0.04, pint=0.10). Diabetic patients showed higher platelet reactivity levels in both control (=on prasugrel, p=0.01) and guided de-escalation group (=on clopidogrel, p=0.005) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although diabetic status did not significantly interfere with the treatment effects of guided DAPT de-escalation, our results suggest that this approach might be safe and effective in non-diabetic patients. Further investigation is definitely warranted in diabetic patients.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Diabetes Mellitus , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Minerva Cardioangiol ; 67(2): 109-114, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30964246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of Aspirin, Pycnogenol®, ticlopidine, and sulodexide to reduce the incidence of new RTV (retinal vein thrombosis) after a first episode. Pycnogenol® is an anti-inflammatory, anti-edema, mild antiplatelet-antithrombotic agent. METHODS: The registry study evaluated the number of repeated episodes of RVT in 12 months. Possible managements were: standard management (SM); SM + Aspirin (100 mg/once day; if there were no tolerability problems); SM + Pycnogenol (100 mg/day); SM and ticlopidine (200 mg/day); SM + sulodexide (500 ULS/day). The number of subjects age and sex, distribution, the percent of smokers, the vision were comparable at inclusion. RESULTS: 307 subjects completed the study, 44 in the SM group, 90 in the Pycnogenol® group, 90 in the aspirin group, 45 in the ticlopidine group and 38 in the sulodexide group. At 12 months, recurrent RVT was documented in 22.7% of controls (SM), 3.3% of Pycnogenol® subjects (P<0.05 vs. SM; 19.4% difference). There were RVTs in 15.5% subjects using Aspirin (-7.2% vs. SM). Ticlopidine also reduced (P<0.05) the incidence of RVT in comparison with SM (-9.1%). Sulodexide reduced the occurrence of new RVT (-9.5% vs. SM). Edema was better controlled with the supplement than with all other treatments (P<0.05) (edema present in only 5.5% of the Pycnogenol® subjects). Pycnogenol® had a very good tolerability and safety profile (no patient had to stop treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Pycnogenol® is the only product able to control edema and this may reduce the incidence of recurrent RVT. This retrospective registry indicates that Aspirin, Pycnogenol®, ticlopidine an sulodexide reduce recurrent RVT without side effects. Larger studies should be planned to involve a wider range of conditions, diseases and risk factors associated with RVT and to its recurrence.


Assuntos
Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/administração & dosagem , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Flavonoides/administração & dosagem , Flavonoides/efeitos adversos , Glicosaminoglicanos/administração & dosagem , Glicosaminoglicanos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA