DETERMINATION OF CORNEAL POWER AFTER REFRACTIVE SURGERY WITH EXCIMER LASER: A CONCISE REVIEW.

Refractive surgery with excimer laser has been a very common surgical procedure worldwide during the last decades. Currently, patients who underwent refractive surgery years ago are older, with a growing number of them now needing cataract surgery. To establish the power of the intraocular lens to be implanted in these patients, it is essential to define the true corneal power. However, since the refractive surgery modified the anterior, but not the posterior surface of the cornea, the determination of the corneal power in this group of patients is challenging. This article reviews the different sources of error in finding the true corneal power in these cases, and comments on several approaches, including the clinical history method as described originally by Holladay, and a modified version of it, as well as new alternatives based on corneal tomography, using devices that are able to measure the actual anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, which have emerged in recent years to address this issue.

The 18-Month Outcomes of a Contralateral, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Photorefractive Keratectomy and SMILE for Myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia. METHODS: This contralateral, randomized, prospective clinical trial included 86 eyes of 43 patients diagnosed as having spherical equivalent (SE) from -1.00 to -8.00 diopters (D). One eye of each patient was randomly allocated to receive either PRK with 0.02% mitomycin C or SMILE. Visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp microscopy, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, Scheimpflug corneal tomography, contrast sensitivity assessment, ocular wavefront aberrometry, and a satisfaction questionnaire were performed preoperatively and during an 18-month follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-three eyes of each group completed the study. After 18 months of follow-up, eyes treated with PRK and SMILE showed comparable results regarding uncorrected distance visual acuity (-0.12 ± 0.07 and -0.25 ± 0.09, respectively), safety, efficacy, contrast sensitivity, and ocular wavefront aberrometry. For predictability, eyes treated with PRK had a statistically lower residual spherical equivalent when compared with eyes treated with SMILE. Residual astigmatism of 0.50 D or less was achieved in 95% of the PRK group and 81% of the SMILE group. At the 1-month follow-up visit, the PRK group presented worse evaluation in relation to vision and foreign body sensation when compared to the SMILE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both PRK and SMILE presented as safe and effective strategies for treating myopia with comparative clinical results. Eyes treated with PRK showed lower spherical equivalent and residual astigmatism. In the first month, eyes treated with SMILE showed less foreign body sensation and faster visual recovery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(3):180-186.].

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Wavefront-Guided Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL) Study Outcomes From a Single Institution.

PURPOSE: To determine patient-reported outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront-guided technology at a single institution. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 62 participants underwent examination and questionnaire at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The questionnaire included questions from validated questionnaires and new items to assess patient satisfaction with current vision and LASIK surgery, and existence/degree of visual symptoms. RESULTS: At month 1, patients reported an improvement in far vision (P = .01), activity limitations (P ≤ .001), and less worry about vision (P ≤ .001), as well as new visual symptoms, including halos (P ≤ .001) and double images (P = .03). At month 3, patients still noted an improvement in near vision (P = .05), far vision (P ≤ .001), activity limitation (P ≤ .001), and worry (P ≤ .001) along with halos (P = .05), double images (P = .01), and dry eye (P = .01). A total of 3.3% of patients at month 1 and 0% at month 3 had difficulty performing any activity due to symptoms, and 34.6% and 25.0% of patients reported decreased quality of life at months 1 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After LASIK, patients experience new visual symptoms. Patients have high rates of satisfaction overall but with some patients reporting a decrease in quality of life 1 month after surgery; quality of life improves by postoperative month 3, with 25% patients reporting a decrease in visual well-being after surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(3):198-204.].

Corneal Epithelial Remodeling in a 6-Month Follow-up Period in Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgeries.

PURPOSE: To investigate corneal epithelial thickness changes during a 6-month follow-up period after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This prospective study included 76 eyes of 76 participants who underwent myopic refractive surgery (23 FS-LASIK, 22 SMILE, and 31 tPRK). Epithelial thickness and anterior curvature were averaged over 4 regions (subdivided into 25 areas) and measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug tomography before the operation (pre) and at 1 or 3 days (pos1-3d), 1 week (pos1w), and 1 month (pos1m), 3 months (pos3m), and 6 months (pos6m) postoperatively. RESULTS: The epithelial thickness of the three groups was similar in both the pre and pos6m (all P > .05), but the tPRK group fluctuated the most during the follow-up period. The largest increase was in the inferior-temporal paracentral area (7.25 ± 2.58 µm for FS-LASIK; 5.79 ± 2.41 µm for SMILE; 4.88 ± 5.84 µm for tPRK; all P < .001). Only the epithelial thickness of tPRK increased from pos3m to pos6m (P < .05), whereas all changes for FS-LASIK and SMILE were not significant (P > .05). A positive correlation of thickness changes with curvature gradient in the paracentral region of tPRK was found (r = 0.549, P = .018), but not in other regions in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial remodeling followed different trends after different surgeries from the early postoperative stage onward, but exhibited similar values at pos6m. Although remodeling after FS-LASIK and SMILE stabilized by pos3m, it remained unstable at pos6m after tPRK. These changes may affect corneal profile and lead to deviation from the intended surgical outcome. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(3):187-196.].

Safety and efficacy of low-energy small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: A retrospective analysis.

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-energy settings in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. Methods: We included patients aged ≥18 years with the myopia of -0.5 to -10 D and myopic astigmatism of -0.5 to -5 Dcyl in this retrospective case series performed at a private eye hospital in South India. All patients had preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of LogMar 0.0 ± 0, with stable refraction for 1 year and normal corneal topography. Ocular surface disease and other pathology cases were excluded. The repetition rate of the laser was 500 kHz, and the pulse energy was 110 nJ. The lenticule diameter was set at 6.5 mm, cap diameter was 7.20 mm, and intended cap thickness was 110-130 µ. The spot distance was 4.5 µm. All patients were evaluated immediately postoperation and on postoperative days 1, 8, and 30. Results: Overall, 541 eyes were included. The mean patient age was 25.03 ± 4.1 years. The mean spherical error was -3.76 ± 1.84 Ds. The mean cylinder was -1.24 ± 0.91. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction was -4.22 ±1.94 D. The logMAR on postoperative day 1 was 0.0 ± 0. The mean spherical equivalent at 1 month was 0.28 ± 1.06 D. There was no loss of Snellen's lines after the procedure. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction to the target was 95% within ± 0.50 D. The postoperative astigmatism was within 0.5 Dycl. No intraoperative complications of SMILE including retained lenticule fragments, tears of incision, or improper dissection occurred. Conclusion: Low-energy settings in SMILE are safe and effective in correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism including high cylinders (>3 Dcyl).

Impact of crossplay between ocular aberrations and depth of focus in topo-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis outcomes.

Purpose: To develop a nomogram in cases with mismatch between subjective and Topolyzer cylinder, and based on the magnitude of the mismatch, customize a treatment plan to attain good visual outcomes post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Methods: The patients were evaluated preoperatively using corneal tomography with Pentacam. Five optimal corneal topography scans were obtained from the Topolyzer Vario were used for planning the LASIK treatment. For the nomogram purpose, the patients were divided into three categories based on the difference between the subjective cylinder and Topolyzer (corneal) cylinder. The first group (group 1) consisted of eyes of patients, where the difference was less than or equal to 0.4 D. The second group (group 2) consisted of eyes, where the difference was more than 0.4 D and the subjective cylinder was lesser than the Topolyzer cylinder. The third group (group 3) included eyes where the difference was more than 0.4 D but the subjective cylinder was greater than the Topolyzer cylinder. LASIK was performed with the WaveLight FS 200 femtosecond laser and WaveLight EX500 excimer laser. Assessment of astigmatism correction for the three groups was done using Aplins vector analysis. For comparison of proportions, Chi-square test was used. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The UDVA was statistically significantly different when compared between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.02). However, the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was similar among all the three groups (P = 0.1). Group 3 showed an increase of residual cylinder by -0.25 D, which was significant at intermediate and near reading distances (P < 0.05). Group 3 showed significantly higher target-induced astigmatism (TIA) compared to groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.01). The mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was the least in group 2, which was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The outcomes for distance vision using our nomogram postoperatively were excellent, but further refinement for improving the near vision outcomes is required.

Effect of fluence levels on prophylactic corneal cross-linking for laser in situ keratomileusis and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of various fluence levels on prophylactic corneal cross-linking (CXL) combined with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK-Xtra) or transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK-Xtra) on biomechanics, demarcation line (DL), and stromal haze. METHODS: Prospective analysis where two prophylactic CXL protocols (lower/higher fluence [LF/HF]: 30 mw/cm2 , 60/80 s, 1.8/2.4 J/cm2 ) were performed as part of either an FS-LASIK-Xtra or TransPRK-Xtra procedure. Data were collected preoperatively and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were (1) dynamic corneal response parameters and the stress-strain index (SSI) from Corvis, (2) actual DL depth (ADL), and (3) stromal haze on OCT images analysed by a machine learning algorithm. RESULTS: Eighty-six eyes from 86 patients underwent FS-LASIK-Xtra-HF (21 eyes), FS-LASIK-Xtra-LF (21 eyes), TransPRK-Xtra-HF (23 eyes), and TransPRK-Xtra-LF (21 eyes). SSI increased similarly by around 15% in all groups 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.155). All other corneal biomechanical parameters were statistically significant worsening postoperatively, but the change was similar in all groups. At 1 month postoperatively, there was no statistical difference in mean ADL among four groups (p = 0.613), mean stromal haze was similar between the two FS-LASIK-Xtra groups, but higher in the TransPRK-Xtra-HF group compared with the TransPRK-Xtra-LF group. CONCLUSIONS: FS-LASIK-Xtra and TransPRK-Xtra lead to a similar ADL and improve SSI equally. Lower fluence prophylactic CXL might be recommended as it achieves similar mean ADL with potentially less induced stromal haze, especially in TransPRK. The clinical relevance and applicability of such protocols remains to be assessed.

Comparison of Vision Correction and Corneal Thickness at 180-Day Follow-Up After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In-Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Study from a Single Center in Poland of 120 Patients with Myopia.

BACKGROUND This study from a single center in Poland included 120 patients with myopia, and the aim was to compare vision correction and corneal thickness at the 180-day follow-up after femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). MATERIAL AND METHODS The effectiveness and safety of laser vision correction (LVC) procedures were evaluated by determining pre- and post-procedure uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) values on the Snell chart. Twenty patients with diagnosed mild myopia (sphere maximum -3.0 diopters D; cylinder maximum 0.5 D) were qualified for PRK surgery. Fifty patients with diagnosed intolerance (sphere maximum -6.0 D; cylinder maximum 5.0 D) were eligible for the FS-LASIK procedure. Fifty patients with diagnosed myopia (sphere maximum -6.0 D cylinder 3.5 D) were qualified for the SMILE procedure. RESULTS Regardless of which procedure was performed, both UDVA and CDVA improved significantly postoperatively (P<0.05). In addition, the UDVA and CDVA values were similar in the postoperative period (P>0.05). For each procedure, the EI was no less than 0.94. Regardless of which type of LVC procedure was performed, CET at the center and 1.5 mm from the center in 4 meridians thickened, and this change was not statistically significant over the observation period (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis demonstrated similar effectiveness of the 3 methods - PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE - in patients with mild and moderate myopia.

Comparison of Corneal Densitometry and Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK): One-Year Comparative Study.

Purpose: To investigate changes in corneal densitometry (CD) and visual quality following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in patients with mild-to-moderate myopia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 24 and 25 patients (46 eyes each) who underwent SMILE and LASEK, respectively, for mild-to-moderate myopia. The visual quality and CD values were recorded. Using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, CD values were collected in three concentric optical zones at the depths of the anterior, central, and posterior layers. Efficacy, safety, predictability, corneal wavefront aberrations, and QoV scores were measured to evaluate visual quality. A correlation analysis was performed between changes in CD and clinical characteristics. Results: There were no statistical differences in efficacy and safety indices between the two groups. At 3 months postoperatively, a pronounced reduction in several zones was observed in the LASEK group (p < 0.05), whereas no obvious change was observed in the SMILE group. There were obvious changes in the CD values in several zones in the SMILE and LASEK groups (p < 0.05) after 1 year. The magnitude of the CD changes in the anterior and central corneal layers was smaller in the SMILE group than in the LASEK group (all p < 0.05). Lower HOAs, spherical aberration, and horizontal comas of the anterior and whole corneal surfaces were observed in the SMILE group. QoV scores were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: CD decreased in the SMILE and LASEK groups after 1 year; there was a smaller reduction in SMILE than in LASEK. SMILE and LASEK did not differ significantly in terms of safety and effectiveness in correcting mild-to-moderate myopia.

Evaluation of the Effects of Myopic Astigmatism Correction and Anterior Corneal Curvature on Functional Optical Zone After SMILE.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of different degrees of myopic astigmatism correction and preoperative anterior corneal curvature on the functional optical zone (FOZ) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 68 patients (106 eyes) treated with SMILE were grouped according to myopic astigmatism correction: control (0.00 diopters [D]), moderate astigmatism (-0.50 to -2.00 D), and high astigmatism (> -2.00 D). The FOZ was measured and compared between the three groups for 3 months. Correlations between attempted correction, anterior corneal curvature, corneal aberrations, and the FOZ were analyzed. RESULTS: The preoperative mean treatment spherical equivalent was comparable among the three groups. The average FOZ was 5.06 ± 0.24 mm in the control group, 5.19 ± 0.25 mm in the moderate astigmatism group, and 5.35 ± 0.20 mm in the high astigmatism group The FOZ showed statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < .001), particularly between the high astigmatism group and the other two groups (P < .001 and .018). Correlation analysis showed that the total higher order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberration change were correlated with the FOZ (P < .001). Preoperative steep keratometry, average keratometry, and corneal astigmatism were significantly correlated with the FOZ (P < .05). The correlation remained after excluding the influence of attempted correction on the FOZ (P < .05). After adjusting for other risk factors using multiple linear regression analysis, there was still a significant positive association between preoperative steep keratometry and the FOZ (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher myopic astigmatism achieved a larger FOZ and less induced horizontal coma than the control and moderate astigmatism groups. A larger FOZ after SMILE can be achieved in eyes with steeper keratometry. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):135-141.].

Changes in aberrations and biomechanics after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in eyes with high astigmatism: a retrospective case control study.

BACKGROUND: To compare the 6-month changes in aberration and biomechanics after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high astigmatism. METHODS: In this retrospective case control study, 47 eyes with high astigmatism (≥ 2.5 D, HA group) and 47 eyes with low astigmatism (≤ 1.0 D, LA group) underwent FS-LASIK. Preoperative and follow-up examinations included visual outcomes, higher order aberrations (HOAs) and biomechanics. Biomechanical parameters include a deformation amplitude ratio of 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and ambrosio relational thickness through the horizontal meridian (ARTh). RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in the efficacy and safety index (both P > 0.05) between the two groups, but the cylinder was higher in the HA group. The HOAs increased significantly after surgery in both groups (all P < 0.05). Six months postoperatively, the changes in spherical aberration and HOAs were larger in the HA group (both P < 0.005), but there was no significant difference between the changes in coma (P > 0.05). Significant decreases in SP-A1 and ARTh and significant increases in the IIR and DA ratio of 2 mm (all P < 0.05) were observed after surgery in both groups. The changes in the DA ratio 2 mm, IIR, SP-A1, and ARTh were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: FS-LASIK had relative comparable efficacy and safety in correcting high and low myopic astigmatism, with higher astigmatic under-correction in eyes with high astigmatism. High astigmatism in eyes after FS-LASIK could introduce larger corneal aberrations, but the impact on corneal stiffness was the same as that in eyes with low astigmatism.

Bilateral sequential small-incision lenticule extraction and LASIK result in similar short-term quality-of-life outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare quality of life (QoL) between patients who receive bilateral small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) vs bilateral sequential SMILE-LASIK (BSSL) surgery. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: 2 patient cohorts were recruited (2010-2012; 2014-2016). The bilateral SMILE (BS) and bilateral LASIK (BL) groups comprised patients (mean ± SD age: 30.3 ± 6.5, 50% male) from a prospective nonrandomized study who chose SMILE and LASIK, respectively. The BSSL group comprised patients (mean ± SD age: 28.6 ± 6.2, 64.3% male) randomized to receive SMILE in 1 eye and LASIK in the other. Rasch-scaled scores of the QoL Impact of Refractive Correction questionnaire between groups postoperatively at 1 and 3 months were compared. RESULTS: At month 1, scores on 3 QoL without emotional well-being items were worse in the BSSL (n = 70) compared with the BL group (n = 25), specficially, "using sunglasses" (ß: -20.6, 95% CI, -34.3 to -6.9), "reliance on refractive correction" (-23.1, 95% CI, -40.9 to -5.4), and "medical complications from optical correction" (ß: -14.8, 95% CI, -27.9 to -1.7). Emotional well-being (overall), and items "feeling able to do things" (ß: 11.0, 95% CI, 1.6-20.4) and "feeling eager to try new things" (ß: 14.1, 95% CI, 3.6-24.6) were better in the BSSL compared with the BS group (n = 25). No substantive differences were observed at month 3. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive correction-related QoL differences at month 1 between BSSL and BS/BL patients attenuated by month 3. Bilateral sequential SMILE-LASIK surgery appeared unlikely to negatively affect QoL beyond 3 months.

Phase I/II randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of processed amniotic fluid drops after PRK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of processed amniotic fluid (pAF) used postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: University of Utah, Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled prospective study. METHODS: 61 participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops, which were instilled 4 times per day for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measure was time to full re-epithelialization in days. Secondary measures included visual acuity at 30 days and postoperative pain scores during the first week. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization, with a median of 5 days for both groups. There were no difference in pain indicator scores during the first week and no difference in corneal staining scores at day 30 between the 2 groups. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication for PRK demonstrated that pAF did not improve the rate of epithelial healing after PRK. pAF may be safely studied in other ocular conditions to determine its effect on epithelial healing.

Wavefront-guided PRK treatment of myopia using a refractive aberrometer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopic refractive errors with and without astigmatism. SETTING: U.S. multicenter study. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical investigation. METHODS: 334 eyes (167 patients) underwent wavefront-guided PRK with the STAR S4 IR Excimer Laser System. Patients had preoperative myopic refractive errors with sphere up to -8.00 diopters (D) and cylinder up to -4.00 D with a maximum spherical equivalent (SE) of -10.00 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia, and treatment plans were derived from the iDESIGN system wavefront measurements. RESULTS: At 6 months, the point of refractive stability, 99.4% of eyes achieved 20/20 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), 92% of eyes achieved 20/16 or better UDVA, 85.5% of eyes achieved manifest refraction SE (MRSE) within 0.50 D of target, mean SE was -0.06, and less than 1% of eyes lost more than 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity. Glare and halos occurred with similar or lower frequencies at 6 months vs preoperative. Results from the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life questionnaire showed statistically significant improvements at 6 months vs preoperative across most measures of vision-related functioning and well-being. Approximately 98% of patients reported high satisfaction with their overall vision at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided PRK with the iDESIGN aberrometer was safe, effective, and predictable for the correction of low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism and led to high patient satisfaction.

Transient change in the binocular visual function after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia patients.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the difference in binocular visual function for high and low-moderate myopes before and after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods: Thirty-three subjects (17 males and 16 females) were divided into two groups according to their preoperative refractive errors in spherical equivalent (SE): low-moderate myopia group (SE ≥-6.00 D) and high myopia group (SE <-6.00 D). The binocular visual function including accommodative amplitude (AA), accommodative facility (AF), positive and negative relative accommodation (PRA and NRA, respectively), horizontal phoria measurement, positive and negative fusion vergence, accommodative-convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio, and stereopsis were assessed with the best-corrected vision before patients received FS-LASIK and 7 and 30 days after the surgery. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to study the change in binocular visual function. Results: The AF values in both groups were significantly reduced after 7 days of FS-LASIK (baseline vs. day 7 (mean): high myopia group: 7.85 vs. 5.62 cpm, repeated ANOVA, P = 0.01; low-moderate myopia group: 5.95 vs. 4.40 cpm, repeated ANOVA, P = 0.04). This change returned to the baseline level 30 days after the operation. In addition, the horizontal phoria values in both groups were significantly reduced for both distant (P = 0.019 and P = 0.001, respectively) and near (P = 0.003 and P = 0.049, respectively) 7 days after the operation, but they rebound to preoperative state after 30 days. Conclusion: A transient change in binocular visual function was noticed after 7 days of FS-LASIK operation, which could cause symptoms of asthenopia. Our data showed all the binocular visual functions returned to baseline level after 30 days of operation.

Laser in situ keratomileusis and surface ablation in pregnancy.

PURPOSE: Although corneal refractive surgery is contraindicated during pregnancy, some patients are unaware that they are pregnant when they undergo surgery. Our objectives were to determine the functional outcomes of corneal refractive surgery during pregnancy and to compare the results with those of nonpregnant women. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series review of patients who were pregnant and who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy, PRK) from September 11, 2002 to December 12, 2020 (group 1, n=82 eyes). Patients were included consecutively. Findings were compared with those of nonpregnant women (group 2, n=164 eyes). Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. Follow-up was at least 550 days (control group, median [IQR], 990 days [715-1496]; study group, 895 days [709-1310]). The setting was Clínica Baviera, Spain, (AIER Eye Hospital Group). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of efficacy index (EI). No complications of pregnancy or labor were reported. Similarly, a search of medical records revealed no adverse effects in the infants. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series on pregnancy and refractive surgery. We do not recommend performing LASIK or surface ablation on pregnant women. Our objective in the present study was to present relevant scientific data obtained from women who underwent refractive surgery while unaware that they were pregnant.

Twelve-month outcomes of a new refractive lenticular extraction procedure

Background: To evaluate the 12-month refractive and visual outcomes of Small Incision Guided Human-cornea Treatment (SmartSight®, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) in the treatment of myopia corrections with low to moderate astigmatism with the use of a new femtosecond laser system.Methods221 eyes of 114 patients consecutively treated with SmartSight lenticule extraction were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 28±6 years at the time of treatment with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -6.26±2.17D and mean astigmatism of 0.92±0.68D. Monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were assessed pre- and post-operatively. Refractive changes have been determined in terms of changes in refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings. The changes in central epithelial thickness have been determined.ResultsAt twelve months post-operatively, mean UDVA was 20/21±2. Spherical equivalent showed a residual refraction of +0.48±0.31D with refractive astigmatism of 0.13±0.18D postoperatively. There was a slight decrease of -0.1 Snellen lines at 12-months follow-up. The same correction was determined using changes in refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings. The central epithelial thickness increased by +3±2µm. Spherical equivalent correction within ±0.50D was achieved in 199 eyes (90%), and cylindrical correction in 221 (100%). Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 or better in 213 eyes (96%), and postoperative uncorrected (UDVA) was 20/20 or better in 205 eyes (93%). No eye had lost two or more Snellen lines of CDVA.ConclusionsMyopic astigmatism correction with SmartSight provided good results for efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes at the twelve months of follow up. The central epithelial thickness barely increased by 3±2µm. (AU)

PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK in Commercial and Military Pilots Requiring Class 1 Medical Certification.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in presbyopic commercial and military pilots requiring Class 1 aeromedical certification. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 23 consecutive pilots who underwent PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK. Postoperative visits were conducted at 1 day and 1, 3, and 12 months. Standard outcomes analysis was performed using the data at 12 months. Objective quality of vision measures including mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000; VectorVision), Ocular Scatter Index (HD Analyzer; Keeler), and straylight (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) were determined before and 3 months after surgery. A questionnaire to assess the functional vision of pilots before and after surgery was derived to record subjective outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 23 pilots treated, data were available at 12 months for 22 pilots (95.7%) and at 3 months for 1 pilot (4.3%). Median age was 55 years (range: 42 to 65 years). At 12 months, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 100% and 20/16 or better in 52% of pilots. Binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was J3 in 73%, J5 in 95%, and J10 in 100% of pilots. Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was J1 or better in 78% and J2 or better in 100% of pilots. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction relative to the target was -0.04 ± 0.34 diopters (D) (range: -0.63 to +0.63 D), with 93% within ±0.50 D. There was a statistically significant increase in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd. C-Quant straylight was 1.07 ± 0.16 before surgery and 1.06 ± 0.16 at 1 to 3 months after surgery (P = .705). All pilots achieved Class 1 medical certification from the United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority and resumed flying. All pilots reported improved functionality compared to the previous vision correction method. CONCLUSIONS: PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK enabled presbyopic commercial pilots to continue to fly without the need for glasses. With consideration of the visually challenging cockpit environment, PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK provides clear continuous vision for tasks at near, intermediate, and far distance. Class 1 pilots reported a subjective improvement in visual tasks and comfort following surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):6-14.].

The Impact of Corneal Epithelial Thickening and Inhomogeneity on Corneal Aberrations After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the corneal epithelial remodeling profile after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), the correlated explanatory variables, and its potential impact on corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs). METHODS: This single-center study prospectively evaluated 75 right eyes of 75 patients scheduled for SMILE. An anterior segment optical coherence tomography device was used to automatically obtain central 6-mm corneal epithelial thickness (ET), total corneal HOAs, and individual Zernike components before and after surgery. The ET inhomogeneity over the central 3- and 6-mm cornea was quantified with coefficient of variance (CV). RESULTS: Both ET and CV significantly increased 1 month postoperatively (all P < .05). The stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that ET and CV were significantly correlated with preoperative ET and CV, respectively (all P < .01). The corrected spherical equivalent also significantly influenced ET and CV (all P < .01). Over the central 6-mm zone, the alterations of total corneal HOAs and individual Zernike components such as vertical coma (Z7) and spherical aberration (Z12, Z24) were significantly correlated with ET and CV (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The SMILE-induced epithelial remodeling involved both ET and ET inhomogeneity. The modulation was associated with preoperative and treatment parameters, and exerted a significant impact on corneal HOA alterations especially over the central 6-mm cornea. Together with the amount of correction and corneal curvature gradient change, preoperative assessment of ET and ET inhomogeneity might help predict postoperative epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):23-32.].

Two-Dimensional Peripheral Refraction and Image Quality for Four Types of Refractive Surgeries.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive investigation of the optical quality across the visual field for current mainstream types of refractive surgeries. METHODS: Sixty eyes from 60 adults who received refractive surgery of either femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Q-value guided customized laser in situ keratomileusis (Q-LASIK), small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), or Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) implantation were included in this study. Refraction and optical aberrations from a visual field of horizontal 60° (from temporal 30° to nasal 30°) and vertical 36° (from superior 20° to inferior 16°) were measured using a custom-made Hartmann-Shack wavefront peripheral sensor. Refractive error, higher order aberrations, point spread function (PSF), and Strehl ratio were compared among these groups prior to and after the surgical procedures, respectively. RESULTS: All types of surgical procedures achieved an almost plano refraction in the central retina. This was also the case in the peripheral retina for the three types of laser refractive surgeries. However, residual peripheral relative hyperopic defocus was observed after ICL implantation. In all groups prior to the surgery, PSFs showed increasing distortion with eccentricity and arrow-like shape pointing toward the central fovea in the periphery in diagonals. Degradation of the PSFs was diminished by all three types of laser refractive surgeries, whereas ICL implantation made the peripheral distortion more prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Although ICL implantation produced a similar impact on refractive correction and objective optical quality in the central vision compared with other laser refractive surgeries, its outcome on the peripheral optics is different. The impact of this difference on visual performance deserves notice and warrants further investigation. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):40-47.].