Uso da terapia a laser de baixa potência como coadjuvante no levantamento de seios maxilares na implantodontia / Use of low-power laser therapy as an adjuvant in elevating maxillary sinuses in implantology

A busca por implantes dentários se tornou uma prática odontológica muito utilizada, no entanto, existem pacientes que não apresenta volume ósseo suficiente para receber o implante. A terapia a laser de baixa potência (LTBP) contém uma resposta relevante no desempenho dessas fases primárias da estabilidade da osseointegração. Dessa maneira, o estudo tem como objetivo analisar a eficiência e aplicação do LTBP em levantamento de seio maxilar dentro da implantodontia, ressaltando seus benefícios, limitações, importância e impacto para saúde bucal. Tratou-se de uma revisão narrativa de literatura, com seleção de artigos científicos encontrados nas bases de dados: PubMed, LILACS, BVS, SciELO e Google Acadêmico, sem período definido de publicação, com cruzamento dos Descritores em Ciências e Saúde (DeCS) e adotados os operadores booleanos "AND" e "OR". A quantidade ideal de altura óssea é importante para a reabilitação com implantes dentários e, em certos casos, o levantamento de seio maxilar se torna necessário expandir a altura de osso residual na maxila por meio da elevação da membrana de Schneider. Sendo assim, a literatura apresenta diversas formas para utilizar o LTBP na implantodontia, desde o início da limpeza na região que vai receber o implante até sua realização cirúrgica, a qual apresenta ótima melhoria na ação de osseointegração, amenizando desconfortos referentes ao pós-operatório e planejamento cirúrgico. Apesar de existir estudos controversos sobre a aplicação do LTBP no levantamento de seio maxilar para colocação de implantes, fica evidente que sua utilização obtém resultados efetivos no processo de cicatrização e reparação dos tecidos ósseos.

The search for dental implants has become a widely used dental practice; however, there are patients who do not have sufficient bone volume to receive the implant. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) contains a relevant response in the performance of these primary phases of osseointegration stability. Thus, the study aims to analyze the efficiency and application of LLLT in maxillary sinus lifting within implantology, highlighting its benefits, limitations, importance, and impact on oral health. It was a narrative literature review, with the selection of scientific articles found in the databases: PubMed, LILACS, BVS, SciELO, and Google Scholar, without a defined publication period, with the crossing of the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) and the adoption of the boolean operators "AND" and "OR." The ideal amount of bone height is important for rehabilitation with dental implants, and in certain cases, maxillary sinus lifting becomes necessary to expand the residual bone height in the maxilla through elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. Thus, the literature presents various ways to use LLLT in implantology, from the beginning of cleaning in the region that will receive the implant to its surgical implementation, which shows excellent improvement in osseointegration action, alleviating discomfort related to postoperative and surgical planning. Although there are controversial studies on the application of LLLT in maxillary sinus lifting for implant placement, it is evident that its use yields effective results in the healing and repair process of bone tissues.

Histomorphometric and microtomographic analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation surgeries with and without collagen membrane on the lateral window: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the histomorphometric and computerized microtomographic (Micro-CT) analysis of the regenerated bone tissue from maxillary sinus augmentation surgery, with and without using the collagen membrane on the external osteotomy window. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients were selected for this prospective, controlled, and randomized study. The patients were submitted to bilateral maxillary sinus surgery in a split-mouth design. On the test side, the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure included using Geistlich Bio-Oss® and a Geistlich Bio-Gide® collagen membrane covering the lateral osteotomy window. On the control side, only Geistlich Bio-Oss® was used without the presence of the membrane. After 6 months, the surgeries for implant installation were performed. In this surgical phase, specimens of the regenerated tissue were collected for histological and Micro-CT analysis. RESULTS: In the histomorphometric evaluation, the mean (±SD) percentages of newly formed bone were 43.9% (±11.5) and 40.8% (±8.9) in the test and control groups, respectively. The corresponding values of the Micro-CT analysis were 36.6% (±3.4) and 37.2% (±4.7) in the test and control groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the test and control groups in the two methods. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean percentage of biomaterial remaining between the test and control groups. However, the mean percentage of newly formed bone was significantly higher and the mean percentage of remaining biomaterial was significantly lower in the histomorphometric analysis compared to the values obtained through microtomography. CONCLUSION: The additional use of collagen membranes in maxillary sinus surgery does not offer advantages in newly formed bone.

Survival analysis of dental implants placed in horizontally severely resorbed maxillae after reconstruction with xenogeneic graft: a case series.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the survival rates of dental implants with a hybrid macrostructure and the surface biomimetically coated with nanohydroxyapatite, placed in horizontally atrophic maxillae previously submitted to the guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure, associated with the use of a deproteinized bovine bone graft (DBB). METHODS: Twenty-five patients who received 196 implants were involved in this study. First, these patients were submitted to GBR procedures and maxillary sinus lift, where DBB was used as the grafting material. The dental implants were placed after a minimum period of 6 months of the grafting procedures. The patients were followed up every six months and clinical/radiographic examinations were performed to assess the implants, using the following indicators as a reference: (1) Absence of mobility; (2) Absence of pain. Data about the age, surgery time, smoking status, implant size, and time between the grafting procedure and implant placement were correlated with implant failures. RESULTS: Twelve implants failed, generating a survival rate of 94.23%. None of the variables analysed correlated with the implant failures. CONCLUSION: Implants with a hybrid macrostructure and surface biomimetically coated with nanohydroxyapatite present good survival rates in horizontally atrophic maxillae grafted with DBB.

Assessment of the osteogenic effect after maxillary sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by analyzing trabecular bone parameters: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this population-based retrospective study was to compare the osteogenic effect of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by quantitatively analyzing trabecular bone parameters. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 patients with missing posterior maxillary teeth who required MSFE and implantation were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: the non-graft group (n=50) and the graft group (n=50). Radiographic parameters were measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the quality of newly formed bone was analyzed by assessing trabecular bone parameters using CTAn (CTAnalyzer, SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium) software. RESULTS: In the selected regions of interest, the non-graft group showed greater bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), bone surface/total volume (BS/TV), trabecular number (Tb. N), and trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) than the graft group (p<0.001). The non-graft group showed lower trabecular separation (Tb. Sp) than the graft group (p<0.001). The incidence of perforation and bleeding was higher in the graft group than in the non-graft group (p<0.001), but infection did not significantly differ between groups (p>0.05). Compared to the graft group, the non-graft group showed lower postoperative bone height, gained bone height and apical bone height (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MSFE with and without bone grafts can significantly improve bone formation. In MSFE, the use of bone grafts hinders the formation of good quality bone, whereas the absence of bone grafts can generate good bone quality and limited bone mass.

Dynamically guided transantral piezoelectric endodontic microsurgery: A case report with technical considerations.

AIM: Endodontic microsurgery (EMS) of maxillary molars may represent a complex challenge to the clinician due to the location of the roots and the proximity of the maxillary sinus floor. This report aimed to describe the simultaneous use of a computer-assisted dynamic navigation (C-ADN) system and piezoelectric bony-window osteotomy for the transantral microsurgical approach of a maxillary left first molar with adequate root canal filling and symptomatic apical periodontitis. SUMMARY: This case report highlights the importance of C-ADN to carry out a minimally invasive buccal surgical access to palatal roots affected by apical periodontitis and provides a practical example to help clinicians make treatment decisions based on the available evidence. Clinical and tomographic evaluations were performed before the surgical procedure and at 24-month follow-up. This case was treated using a C-ADN system fitted to a piezotome for the buccal approach of the buccal roots, maxillary sinus membrane lifting, and for transantral location, root-end resection, cavity preparation, and filling of the palatal root. The navigation system allowed to achieve an accurate apical canal terminus location and root-end filling of the three roots with a minimally invasive piezoelectric crypt approach. At the 24-month follow-up examination, the patient remains asymptomatic, with normal periapical structures, and regeneration of maxillary sinus walls. It was concluded that the combination of dynamic navigation with piezoelectric bony-window osteotomy offers enhanced accuracy, tissue preservation, diminished risk of iatrogenic complications, and could maximize success and survival rates in transantral EMS.

Comparison of sinusitis rate after sinus lift procedure and zygomatic implant surgery: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the reported sinusitis occurrence after the sinus lift procedure and zygomatic implant placement. METHODS: This meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO. Studies were searched on six databases. Two authors screened titles and abstracts and fully analyzed the studies against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The RoB 2.0 and the ROBINS-I tools were used to assess the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. The random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The prevalence of sinusitis was calculated based on the total of patients. Subgroup analysis was performed by sinus lift or zygomatic implant surgery technique. RESULTS: The search identified 2419 references. After applying the inclusion criteria, 18 sinus lift and 9 zygomatic implant placement studies were considered eligible. The pooled prevalence of sinusitis after sinus lift procedure was 1.11% (95% CI 0.30-2.28). The prevalence after zygomatic implant placement was 3.76% (95% CI 0.12-10.29). In the subgroup analysis, the lateral window approach showed a prevalence of sinusitis of 1.35% (95% CI 0.34-2.8), the transcrestal technique of 0.00% (95% CI 0.00-3.18), and the SALSA technique of 1.20% (95% CI 0.00-5.10). Regarding the techniques for zygomatic implant placement, the sinus slot technique showed a prevalence of 21.62% (95% CI 9.62-36.52) and the intrasinus technique of 4.36% (95% CI 0.33-11.08), and the prevalence after the extrasinus technique was 0.00% (95% CI 0.00-1.22). CONCLUSION: The sinusitis occurrence rate was higher after zygomatic implant placement than after sinus lift procedure and this occurrence was different depending on the used technique.

Instalação de implante em região posterior de maxila através da técnica de Summers e osseodensificação: relato de caso / Implant installation in posterior maxilla using the Summers technique and osseodensification: a case report / Instalación de implantes en la región posterior del maxilar utilizando la técnica de Summers y la oseodensificación: informe de un caso

Este trabalho tem por objetivo relatar um caso em que foi realizada a técnica de Summers para elevação do seio maxilar, associada à realização de osseodensificação. Paciente do gênero masculino, 53 anos, apresentando ausência do dente 17, com altura reduzida na área edêntula. Foi realizada a elevação do seio maxilar pela técnica de Summers associada à osseodensificação da região para uma melhora da qualidade óssea. Foi instalado um implante cone morse SIN de 3.8 x 8.5 com torque de 45 newtons. No acompanhamento pós-operatório não houve qualquer sinal ou sintoma de complicação e o paciente foi reabilitada com uma prótese parafusada sobre implante.

This study aims to report a case in which the Summers technique was performed for maxillary sinus elevation, associated with osseodensification. Male patient, 53 years old, with missing tooth 17, with reduced height in the edentulous area. Maxillary sinus elevation was performed using the Summers technique associated with osseodensification of the region for an improvement in bone quality. A 3.8 x 8.5 SIN morse taper implant with a torque of 45 newtons was installed. In the postoperative follow-up, there were no signs or symptoms of complications and the patient was rehabilitated with a screw-retained implant prosthesis.

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo informar de un caso en el que se realizó la técnica de Summers para la elevación del seno maxilar, asociada a la osteodensificación. Paciente varón, de 53 años, que presenta ausencia del diente 17, con altura reducida en la zona edéntula. Se elevó el seno maxilar mediante la técnica de Summers asociada a la osteodensificación de la región para mejorar la calidad ósea. Se instaló un implante morse cónico de 3,8 x 8,5 SIN con un par de 45 newtons. En el seguimiento postoperatorio no hubo signos ni síntomas de complicación y el paciente fue rehabilitado con una prótesis atornillada sobre un implante.

Digitally Guided Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement: 3 Case Reports With Technical Considerations.

A sinus floor elevation via lateral window (LSFE) is one of the most widely used bone augmentation procedures for implant therapy in the posterior area of the maxilla. Locating and preparing a correct opening window on the lateral sinus wall is a key step of this procedure. Conventionally, the surgeon designs and locates the window after the flap is reflected based on the information obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images or other diagnostic aids. Nevertheless, in spite of the advancements in CBCT imaging, clinicians may still experience hardships in situating and procuring meticulous access to the maxillary sinus by using CBCT alone. Therefore, in cases requiring an LSFE simultaneous to implant placement, a maxillary sinus surgical guide has been tested and reported to be the amiable method to be utilized as a conjunct to prevent unpredictable consequences according to its application in implying both the direction for the implant and the location of the lateral window. This article presents 3 clinical cases with a fully digital approach to guide the opening of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus as well as the simultaneous placement of a single implant in an ideal 3D position. Based on the CBCT images and intraoral scan, a surgical guide was fabricated based on 3D software. During surgery, this teeth-supported template can be placed intraorally, guiding sinus window opening preparation. This technique makes the sinus window opening procedure simple and predictable, reduces surgical time and the risk of complications, and allows the placement of the implant in the ideal 3D position.

Combination of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin and demineralized bovine bone graft enhanced bone formation and healing after maxillary sinus augmentation: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The resorption of alveolar ridge bone and maxillary sinus pneumatization are challenges to implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation. Bone regeneration using bone substitutes and growth factors are alternatives for maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA). Therefore, we sought to evaluate the effects of the association between leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in MSA procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six maxillary sinuses from 24 individuals were included in this randomized clinical trial. The maxillary sinuses were randomly grafted with LPRF and DBBM (test group) or grafted only with DBBM (positive control). Dental implants were installed in the test group following two periods of evaluation: after 4 (DBBM+LPRF4) and 8 (DBBM+LPFR8) months of sinus graft healing, while the control group received implants only after 8 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken 1 week after surgery (T1) and before implant placement (T2). Bone samples were collected during implant placement for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. The primary implant stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis. RESULTS: CBCT analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in bone volume from T1 to T2 in all groups without differences among them. Histologically, the test group showed significantly increase in bone neoformation in both periods of evaluation (LPRF+DBBM4: 44.70±14.01%; LPRF+DBBM8: 46.56±12.25%) compared to the control group (32.34±9.49%). The control group showed the highest percentage of residual graft. IHC analysis showed increased staining intensity of osteocalcin (OCN), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2) in LPRF+DBBM4 group, and osteopontin (OPN) in the L-PRF+DBBM8. Primary implant stability was successfully achieved (above 60 in implant stability quotient) in all the evaluated groups. CONCLUSION: Combination of L-PRF and DBBM increased and accelerated new bone formation allowing early implant placement probably due to the higher protein expression of RUNX2, VEGF, OCN, and OPN. These data suggest that the use of L-PRF might be an interesting alternative to use in combination with DBBM for augment the maxillary sinuses allowing the installation of appropriate length implants in shorter period of time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study showed improvement in bone neoformation and accelerated healing when associating L-PRF and DBBM for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered before participant recruitment in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC - RBR-95m73t).

Elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto y colocación simultánea de implante dental / Graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implant placement

Introducción: La elevación de seno maxilar con implante dental simultáneo, sin el uso de substitutos óseos, ha retomado la teoría del potencial de neoformación ósea, que el coágulo de sangre alojado bajo la membrana de Schneider por sí solo presenta. Excluyendo así la necesidad de materiales exógenos. Objetivo: Exponer la efectividad de la elevación de seno maxilar con implante dental simultáneo, sin el uso de injerto, mediante la evaluación de la cantidad de ganancia ósea vertical. Presentación de casos: Caso 1: Paciente de 62 años, género femenino, que fue sometida a una elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto e implante dental simultáneo, con técnica de ventana lateral debido a altura ósea reducida de 5,24 mm. Luego del período de seguimiento tomográfico de 12 meses, después de la carga protésica, se logró una altura ósea vertical de 10,2 mm, lo que dio como resultado una ganancia ósea vertical de 4,96 mm. Caso 2: Paciente de 48 años, género femenino, que fue sometida a una elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto e implante dental simultáneo, con técnica transalveolar, mediante el uso de piezoeléctrico debido a una altura ósea reducida de 8,33 mm. Luego del período de seguimiento radiográfico de 4 meses, antes de la carga protésica, se logró una altura ósea vertical de 11,55 mm, lo que dio como resultado una ganancia ósea vertical de 3,19 mm. Conclusiones: Con base en estos 2 informes de casos, la elevación de seno maxilar e implante dental simultáneo sin injerto se asocian con la reducción de la morbilidad quirúrgica, menor probabilidad de procesos infecciosos y menor costo de la cirugía. Por lo tanto, puede considerarse una alternativa quirúrgica para la colocación de implantes en el maxilar posterior superior debido a deficiencias óseas verticales, independientemente de la técnica (lateral o transalveolar(AU)

Introduction: Maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation without using bone substitutes, reapproaches the theory about the bone neoformation potential of the blood clot housed under the Schneider membrane, all by itself, thus excluding the need to use exogenous materials. Objective: Discuss the effectiveness of graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implant placement through an evaluation of the amount of vertical bone gain. Case presentation: Case 1: Female 62-year-old patient undergoing graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation by lateral window technique due to a reduced bone height of 5.24 mm. After a 12-month tomographic follow-up period subsequent to prosthetic loading, a 10.2 mm vertical bone height was achieved, resulting in 4.96 mm vertical bone gain. Case 2: Female 48-year-old patient undergoing graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation by transalveolar technique using a piezoelectric generator due to a reduced bone height of 8.33 mm. After a 4-month radiographic follow-up period, before prosthetic loading, an 11.55 mm vertical bone height was achieved, resulting in 3.19 mm vertical bone gain. Conclusions: According to these two case reports, graftless maxillary sinus lifting with simultaneous dental implantation is associated to reduced surgical morbidity, a lesser probability of infectious processes and lower surgical costs. It may therefore be considered to be a surgical alternative for implant placement in the posterior maxilla due to vertical bone deficiencies, regardless of the technique used (lateral or transalveolar(AU)

Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus can make it difficult, if not impossible, to install osseointegrated implants, and undertake their eventual functional rehabilitation, which may ultimately require regenerative techniques to achieve. This randomized controlled study proposed conducting a histological evaluation of the behavior of different graft materials in wide maxillary sinuses, at a height of 8 to 10 mm from the alveolar ridge, combined with bone remnants less than 3mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients underwent a sinus elevation procedure through the lateral window. The sinuses were randomly filled with the following materials (n=12/group): group 1, xenogenic bone + autogenous bone (ratio 70:30, respectively); group 2, xenogenic bone + L-PRF; and group 3, xenogenic bone. At 8 months, bone biopsies of engrafted sites were harvested and analyzed histomorphometrically in order to quantify newly formed bone tissue. RESULTS: The results showed a greater area of newly formed bone for G1, averaging 2678.37 (1116.40) µm2, compared with G2 at 984.87 (784.27) µm2, and G3 at 480.66 (384.76) µm2 (p < 0.05). Additionally, fewer xenogenic bone particles and a large amount of connective tissue were observed in G2. CONCLUSIONS: In maxillary sinuses with large antral cavities, autogenous bone combined with xenogenic bone seems to demonstrate better graft remodeling and improve bone formation, compared with the addition of L-PRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: L-PRF produces few advantages regarding new bone formation in the wide maxillary sinuses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC) number RBR-2pbbrvg.

Endoscopic analysis of alterations in sinus floor elevation approaching the summers technique and immediate implant: a clinical trial with 10 years follow-up / Análise endoscópica das alterações na elevação do assoalho do seio maxilar com abordagem da técnica de Summer e implante imediato: um ensaio clínico com 10 anos de acompanhamento

The goal of this study was to evaluate by endoscopy, possible intercurrences during the sinus floor lifting employing the Summers technique, besides verify the implants' survival rate after 10 years. Six patients (12 sinus) were included in this study. The same surgeon performed the procedures, under local anesthesia and venous sedation in the hospital. All participants underwent sinus lift and implant placement in only one procedure, as previously planned, using endoscopic analysis (Stortz®). All cases received bovine bone graft (Bio-Oss®) before the implant placement. After 10 years, the patients were recalled for follow-up. Two intercurrences (16.66%) were detected using the endoscope, one simple rupture, and another perforation with the leaking of the graft within the sinus. Both were reverted and corrected immediately. There was one implant loss (8.33%), therefore this patient did not undergo any intercurrence in transoperative, and the membrane was elevated lesser than 5 mm. The survival rate reached was 91.66%. The osteotome technique constitutes a reliable method with a long-term of 10 years presenting a high implant survival rate, suggesting an elevation up to 5.5 mm in healthy patients. The occurrences in transoperative were only detected by the endoscopic analysis which must be stimulated to guarantee more secure visibility. Otherwise, the association the atraumatic technique and endoscope was tough, increased the costs, limiting the use routinely.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar através de endoscopia as possíveis intercorrências durante levantamento de seio maxilar fechado, além de verificar a taxa de sobrevivência dos implantes após 10 anos. Seis pacientes (12 seios maxilares) foram incluídos neste estudo com idades entre 26 e 74 anos. O mesmo cirurgião realizou os procedimentos, sob anestesia local e sedação venosa em ambiente hospitalar. Todos os participantes foram submetidos à elevação do seio nasal e colocação do implante em apenas um procedimento, conforme planejado anteriormente, por acompanhamento transcirúrgico da endoscopia (Stortz®). Todos os casos receberam enxerto ósseo bovino (Bio-Oss®) antes da colocação do implante. Após 10 anos, os pacientes foram chamados para acompanhamento. Foram detectadas duas intercorrências (16,66%) com o endoscópio, uma ruptura simples e outra perfuração com extravasamento do enxerto para dentro do seio. Ambos foram revertidos e corrigidos imediatamente. Houve perda de um implante (8,33%), portanto esse paciente não apresentou intercorrência no transoperatório e a membrana estava elevada menos de 5 mm. A taxa de sobrevivência alcançada foi de 91,66%. A técnica do osteótomo constitui um método confiável em longo prazo (10 anos) apresentando uma alta taxa de sobrevivência do implante, sugerindo que uma elevação de até 5,5 mm em pacientes saudáveis é possível. Assim, verificou-se que as ocorrências no transoperatório foram detectadas apenas pela análise endoscópica que deve ser estimulada para garantir uma visibilidade mais segura. Por outro lado, a associação da técnica fechada com o endoscópio foi difícil, aumentou os custos, limitando seu uso como rotina

Delayed Bleeding in a Hemophilic Patient After Sinus Floor Elevation and Multiple Implant Placements: A Case Report.

Dental treatments in hemophilic patients are challenging, and the absence of adequate preparation for the procedures can be life-threatening. This letter describes a delayed postoperative bleeding after multiple dental implants with sinus floor elevation in a patient with mild hemophilia A.

Transcrestal sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement using osseodensification in posterior maxilla with residual bone height of 4-6 mm / Elevação de seio maxilar via crista do rebordo com instalação simultânea de implante utilizando osseodensificador em região posterior de maxila com altura do remanescente ósseo de 4 a 6 mm

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the transcrestal sinus lift using Osseodensification technique with simultaneous implant placement. Material and Methods: In this case series 7 patients who needed implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla were enrolled. In all the cases the residual bone height between the sinus floor and the alveolar crest was 4-6 mm. Transcrestal sinus lift was performed using Osseodensification with simultaneous implant placement. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were obtained immediately postoperative and 6 months after operation. Implant stability using Osstell® were assessed at the time of implant placement and implant exposure (6 months). Results: The results showed that the mean bone height gain was 5.33±0.83mm at 6 months postoperatively. Mean bone density value was 818.43±109.63 HU. Mean ISQ value was 80.00±3.11 at 6 months postoperatively. The duration of surgical procedure (minutes) ranged between 25-38 minutes with an average of 30.86±4.10 minutes. Conclusion: The crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation using Osseodensification technique with simultaneous implant placement provide superior results regarding bone density and implant stability and less duration of surgical procedure. (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a elevação de seio maxilar via crista do rebordo com a técnica de Osseodensificação com instalação simultânea de implante. Material e Métodos: Nesta série de casos, participaram 7 pacientes que necessitavam de implantes em região posterior de maxila atrófica. Em todos os casos a altura de remanescente ósseo entre o soalho do seio e a crista alveolar estava entre 4 a 6 mm. A elevação de seio maxilar via crista do rebordo foi realizada com osseodensificação com instalação simultânea de implante. As Tomografias Computadorizadas Cone Beam (TCCB) foram obtidas imediatamente após a cirurgia e 6 meses depois. A estabilidade dos implantes utilizando Osstell® foi avaliada no momento da instalação do implante e no momento da reabertura (6 meses). Resultados: Os resultados mostraram que a média de ganho de altura óssea foi de 5.33±0.83mm após 6 meses da cirurgia. A média da densidade óssea foi de 818.43±109.63 HU. A média de ISQ foi de 80.00±3.11 após 6 meses da cirurgia. A duração do procedimento cirúrgico (minutos) foi entre 25 a 38 minutos com uma média de 30.86±4.10 minutos. Conclusão: A elevação do soalho de seio maxilar via crista do rebordo com instalação simultânea de implante utilizando osseodensificador promove resultados superiores em relação à densidade óssea, estabilidade do implante e menor duração do tempo cirúrgico (AU)

Elevación unilateral de piso de seno maxilar con ventana lateral utilizando xenoinjerto: reporte de caso / Unilateral elevation of maxillary sinus floor with lateral window using xenografts: report of a case

En maxilares atróficos la elevación de piso de seno es una práctica de alta predictibilidad. El adve- nimiento de materiales osteoconductores que generan andamiaje para la formación ósea propor- cionaron un aumento en la tasa de éxito de los implantes endoóseos. El presente artículo reporta un caso clínico en el cual se llevo a cabo un aumento del nivel de altura del piso de seno unila- teralmente por medio de la técnica de Cadwell- Luck modificada por Tatum, técnica con ventana lateral, donde se utilizó xenoinjerto óseo (OstiumMAX, implante de matriz ósea bovina, Laboratorio Bioxen) y membrana reabsorbible de colágeno( Laboratorio Bioxen) en el primer tiempo quirúrgi- co y seis meses después, en el segundo acto quirúrgico se colocaron tres implantes endoóseos (Sistema de implante dental TRP, Laboratorio Tormicron S.R.L.). Los resultados obtenidos fueron controlados en forma mediata y a distancia a través de radiografías panorámicas y tomografías computadas tipo Cone Beam, donde se midió la altura ósea generada post injerto. Pudo consta- tarse el éxito del procedimiento, basándonos en criterios clínico radiograficos de oseointegración (AU)

Estudo comparativo entre o Bonefill e o Bio-Oss na enxertia óssea de seios maxilares com elevação da membrana sinusal: análise histométrica e imunoistoquímica / Comparison between bone study and bone biograft of maxillary bones with sinus membrane extension: histometric and immunohistochemical analysis

Objetivo: Comparar através de análise histométrica, imunoistoquímica o comportamento dos biomateriais Bonefill, Bio-Oss e do osso autógeno na enxertia de seios maxilares de humanos. Metodologia: 18 seios maxilares foram enxertados divididos em 3 grupos sendo o grupo autógeno controle; Grupo Bonefill; Grupo Bio-Oss. Após 6 meses as biópsias foram realizadas no sítio de instalação dos implantes. Resultados: A histometria apresentou maior formação óssea para o Bonefill (p< 0,002) em relação ao Bio-Oss, e maior presença de biomaterial remanescente para o Bio-Oss. A imunoistoquímica apresentou um padrão de maturação óssea maior para o Bonefill em relação ao Bio-Oss. Conclusão: Concluímos dentro dos limites desse estudo, o Bonefill apresentou maior quantidade osso neoformado e menor quantidade de tecido conjuntivo medular em relação ao Bio-Oss(AU)

Objective: To compare through histometric and immunohistochemical analysis of the behavior of Bonefill, Bio-Oss and autogenous bone biomaterials in human maxillary sinus grafting. Methodology 18 selectors were grafted maxima divided into 3 groups being the autogenous control group; Bonefill Group; Bio-Oss Group. After 6 months, biopsies were performed at the implant placement site. Results: Histometry showed greater bone formation for Bonefill (p< 0,002) in relation to Bio-Oss, and greater presence of remaining biomaterial for Bio-Oss. Immunohistochemistry showed a higher maturation pattern for Bonefill in relation to Bio-Oss. Conclusion: We concluded, within the limits of this study, Bonefill presented a greater amount of neoformed bone and a smaller amount of medullary connective tissue in relation to Bio-Oss(AU)

Posterior rehabilitation using 3D-printed dental implants and synthetic regenerative biomaterials / Reabilitação posterior com implantes impressos e biomateriais sintéticos

Aim: To describe through a clinical case report the surgical sequence of rehabilitation with 3D-printed implants associated with maxillary sinus floor lift with synthetic regenerative materials, including biphasic bioceramic. Case Report: Patient had an agenesis of the upper left premolars (#12 and #13), a vertical bone deficiency caused by maxillary sinus' pneumatization, and a horizontal alveolar resorption around the missing teeth area. During the surgical procedures, incisions, detachment, and osteotomy were performed in the lateral region of the maxillary sinus. The sinus membrane was detached and lifted 10 mm. Then, a thick poly(dioxanone)-based synthetic resorbable membrane (Plenum) was inserted and adapted inside the sinus to protect the sinus membrane. After the osteotomies with sub-instrumentation, 3D-printed implants (Plenum) were installed in the #12 area (3.5mm x 11.5 mm; 30N) and #13 area (4.0mm x 10mm; 20N). The maxillary sinus was entirely filled with a biphasic bioceramic, HA/ß-TCP (70:30) 500-1000 µm (Plenum) and covered by the same synthetic resorbable membrane. Connective tissue graft from the palatal area was positioned internally to the flap and stabilized with sutures to improve the vestibular tissue architecture. The entire surgical wound was sutured, and the tissues stabilized. No complications occurred in the postoperative period. Conclusion: The use of synthetic regenerative memberane and 3D-printed implants seems to be a promising option in areas of deficient bone remnants (AU)

Objetivo: Descrever por meio de um relato de caso clínico a sequência cirúrgica de reabilitação com implantes obtidos por impressão 3D associados à elevação do assoalho do seio maxilar com materiais regenerativos sintéticos, incluindo uma biocerâmica bifásica. Relato de Caso: Paciente apresentava agenesia dos pré-molares superiores esquerdos (24 e 25), deficiência óssea vertical causada pela pneumatização do seio maxilar e reabsorção alveolar horizontal ao redor da área dos dentes ausentes. Durante os procedimentos cirúrgicos foram realizados incisões, descolamento e osteotomia na região lateral do seio maxilar. A membrana sinusal foi descolada e elevada 10 mm. Em seguida, uma membrana reabsorvível sintética à base de poli(dioxanona) espessa (Plenum) foi inserida e adaptada dentro do seio para proteger a membrana do seio. Após as osteotomias com subinstrumentação, implantes impressos em 3D (Plenum) foram instalados na área do 24 (3,5mm x 11,5mm; 30N) e na área do 25 (4,0mm x 10mm; 20N). O seio maxilar foi inteiramente preenchido com biocerâmica bifásica, HA/ß-TCP (70:30)500-1000 µm (Plenum) e recoberto pela mesma membrana sintética reabsorvível. O tecido conjuntivo da região palatina foi posicionado internamente ao retalho e estabilizado com suturas para melhorar a arquitetura do tecido vestibular. Toda a ferida cirúrgica foi suturada e os tecidos estabilizados. Não ocorreram complicações no pós-operatório. Conclusão:A utilização de biomateriais regenerativos sintéticos e implantes impressos parece ser uma opção promissora em áreas de remanescentes ósseos deficientes.(AU)

A utilização isolada da matriz inorgânica óssea bovina em levantamentos de seios maxilares é previsível? Avaliação dos fatores de risco e obtenção de osseointegração de implantes instalados / Is the isolated utilization of the bovine inorganic matrix in maxillary sinus elevation predictable? Assessment of the risk factors and the obtainment of the osseointegration of installed implants

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar retrospectivamente a previsibilidade, por meio da análise de prontuários, os fatores de risco e a obtenção de osseointegração de implantes dentários instalados em seios maxilares submetidos à enxertia, utilizando como único material de enxerto a matriz inorgânica óssea bovina (Geistlich Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Pharma, Wolhusen, Suiça). A partir de 45 prontuários de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de elevação de seio maxilar uni ou bilateral foram analisados os dados de 116 implantes instalados em 60 seios maxilares enxertados. A obtenção da osseointegração e a possível influência das variáveis sexo, idade, tabagismo, ocorrência de perfuração transoperatória da mucosa sinusal, tempo de espera entre a realização do enxerto e instalação dos implantes, diâmetro, comprimento e estabilidade primária obtida dos implantes instalados foram avaliadas. Os dados coletados foram tabulados e submetidos à análise estatística pelo teste qui-quadrado (x²) de Pearson. Os resultados obtidos revelaram osseointegração em 97,78% (n=113) dos implantes avaliados. Apenas o parâmetro comprimento mostrou-se estatisticamente significante na amostra. Dentro dos limites deste estudo, pode-se concluir que a instalação de implantes osseointegrados em seios maxilares enxertados com matriz inorgânica óssea bovina isolada possui alta previsibilidade de obtenção de osseointegração sendo o comprimento dos implantes instalados o único fator estatisticamente significante na sua obtenção

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the predictability, through the analysis of the medical records, the risk factors and the acquiring of osseointegration of dental implants installed in maxillary sinuses submitted to grafting, by using, as the only graft material, the bovine inorganic matrix Geistlich Bio-Oss®ï¸, Geistlich Pharma, Wolhusen, Switzerland). From 45 records of patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral maxillary sinus elevation operation, data from 116 implants installed in 60 grafted maxillary sinuses were analyzed. The attainment of osseointegration and the possible influence of the variables gender, age, smoking, the occurrence of intraoperative perforation of the sinus mucosa, the waiting time between the grafting and the installation of the implants, diameter, length, and primary stability obtained of the installed implants were analyzed. The data collected were tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis using Pearson's chi-squared (x²) test. The results obtained showed osseointegration in 97,78% (n=113) of the evaluated implant. The length was the only parameter that showed statistical significance in the sample. Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that the installation of implants osseointegrated in maxillary sinuses grafted with isolated bovine inorganic matrix has high predictability of obtaining osseointegration and that the length of the installed implants is the only statistically significant factor to its obtainment.

Use of a stackable surgical guide to improve the accuracy of the lateral wall approach for sinus grafting in the presence of a sinus septum.

The identification and management of interfering maxillary sinus septa is essential to anticipate and prevent membrane perforation and other complications during sinus grafting. A computer-guided sinus approach based on a new magnetic stackable surgical guide was planned, to transfer the exact position of the septum and optimize the positioning of the lateral access windows. This technique reduces the risk of sinus membrane injury, thereby increasing the safety and efficacy of the procedure.

Three-dimensional volumetric changes of 5 different bone grafts in human maxillary sinuses reconstruction: a randomized clinical study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the three-dimensional volumetric changes of human maxillary sinuses after reconstruction using 5 different bone grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients underwent unilateral maxillary sinus bone height reconstruction using 5 bone substitutes allocated in different groups as follows: group 1 was grafted with autogenous bone graft alone; group 2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP); group 3 with ß-TCP + autogenous bone graft 1:1; group 4 with bioactive glass; and group 5 with bioactive glass + autogenous bone graft 1:1. The patients were submitted to cone beam computed tomography in two periods: 15 days after the surgical procedure (T1) and after 6 months (T2). The results were evaluated as the formula T2-T1 expressing the three-volumetric changes of the biomaterials in elapsed time. RESULTS: The resorption rate of autogenous bone graft was -630.699 ± 300.9 mm3; in the ß-TCP group, it was -315.772 ± 125.6 mm3; in the group with ß-TCP + autogenous bone graft 1:1, it was -336.205 ± 195.7 mm3; and in groups with bioactive glass and with the addition of autogenous bone graft 1:1, it was -428.878 ± 311.6 mm3 and -576.917 ± 471.6 mm3, respectively, without statistical difference (p = 0.167). Pearson's correlated test revealed a strong correlation as well as a progressive resorption of the grafts during bone healing. CONCLUSION: The similar outcomes for the three-dimensional volumetric changes using the bone substitutes evaluated after 6 months of bone healing suggest that all these grafts can be performed to maxillary sinus reconstruction.