Development and curricular alignment of a pharmacy travel medicine elective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Describe the design, implementation, and value of a travel medicine pharmacy elective. Students translated skills from rotations and practice environments addressing travel health-related needs. Content and educational outcomes align with the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, and Pharmacists' Patient Care Process core components of student learning and assessment. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A two-credit travel medicine elective included live and pre-recorded lectures, self-learning modules, peer critiques, and patient engagement. Students shadowed in a travel health clinic interacting with patients to prepare a formal travel care plan unique to the patient's history and travel destination. Pre- and post-course surveys, quizzes, progressive assignments, and course evaluations provided the framework for curricular enhancement. FINDINGS: A cohort of 32 third-year students provided evidence of successful curricular integration. Pre-course surveys demonstrated 87% of students self-scored low knowledge and ability to apply travel health services. Ninety percent of post-course surveys reported high levels of knowledge and ability. High perceived value was evident in course evaluations with some student intent to pursue credentialing. SUMMARY: Community practice affords increased opportunities to identify patients in need of travel medicine services. The unique approach and design supported successful integration of a travel medicine elective in the University of South Florida Taneja College of Pharmacy curriculum. Upon elective completion, students were prepared to educate internationally traveling patients to safely self-manage chronic health conditions, reduce potential health risks and harm exposures during travel, and monitor health changes upon return.

Factores asociados con malaria y arboviriasis en pacientes con síndrome febril importado: estudio de cohortes retrospectivo / Factors associated with malaria and arboviral disease in patients with imported febrile syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

Objetivos: Definir variables predictoras de malaria y arboviriasis en pacientes que consultan por síndrome febril tras la vuelta de un viaje a zonas tropicales/subtropicales. Método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyeron variables demográficas, epidemiológicas, clínicas, analíticas y el diagnóstico final clínico y microbiológico. Se realizó un análisis multivariante y se calcularon los índices de exactitud diagnóstica (sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos) y cocientes de probabilidad de la combinación de dichas variables. Resultados: Se incluyeron 291 pacientes con síndrome febril, 108 tenían malaria (37,1%), 28 arboviriasis (9,6%) y 155 otras causas de fiebre (53,3%). En el análisis multivariante, los pacientes con síndrome febril con más riesgo de padecer malaria fueron los que procedían de África subsahariana [odds ratio ajustado (ORa): 45,85; IC 95%: 9,45-222,49], eran inmigrantes que visitan a familiares y amigos (VFA) (ORa = 3,55; IC 95%: 1,21-10,46), presentaban cifras de plaquetas < 150.000/mm3 (ORa = 16,47; IC 95%: 5,46-49,70) o cefalea (ORa = 10,62; IC 95%: 3,20-35,28). La combinación de estas cuatro variables tiene un cociente de probabilidad positivo (CPP) de 23,72 (IC 95%: 5,76-97,62). Los pacientes con síndrome febril que tienen más riesgo de padecer arboviriasis eran los que procedían de Centroamérica y Sudamérica (OR = 5,07; IC 95%: 1,73-14,92), presentaban exantema (OR = 5,10; IC 95%: 1,72-17,02) o artromialgias (OR = 14,50; IC 95%: 3,05-68,80). La combinación de estas tres variables tiene un CPP de 20,66 (IC 95%: 7,74-55,21). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con síndrome febril que tienen más riesgo de padecer malaria son los que procedían de África subsahariana, eran VFA, presentaban cifras de plaquetas < 150.000/μl o cefalea, y tenían mayor riesgo de padecer arboviriasis si procedían de Centroamérica y Sudamérica, presentaban exantema o artromialgias. (AU)

Objective: To identify predictors of malaria and arboviral disease in patients with febrile syndrome who seek care after traveling from tropical or subtropical locations. Methods: Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical data; laboratory findings; and the clinical and final microbiologic diagnoses. Multivariate analysis was used to calculate indices of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) and coefficients of probability of combinations of variables. Results: Data for 291 patients with febrile syndrome were included; 108 had malaria (37.1%), 28 had an arboviral disease (9.6%), and 155 had other causes of fever (53.3%). Multivariate analysis showed patients most likely to have malaria were those from sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 45.85 (95% CI, 9.45-222.49); immigrants who returned to visit friends and relatives (VFR), aOR of 3.55 (95% CI, 1.21-10.46); or had platelet concentrations <150 000/mm3, aORa of 16.47 (95% CI, 5.46-49.70) or headache, aOR of 10.62 (95% CI, 3.20-35.28). The combination of these 4 variables gave a positive probability coefficient (PPC) of 23.72 (95% CI, 5.76-97.62). Patients with febrile syndrome most likely to have an arboviral disease were those from Central or South America, OR 5.07 (95% CI, 1.73-14.92), and those who had exanthems, OR 5.10 (95% CI, 1.72-17.02) or joint pain, OR 14.50 (95% CI, 3.05-68.80). The combination of these 3 variables gave a PPC of 20.66 (95% CI, 7.74-55.21). Conclusions: Patients with febrile syndrome with the greatest probability of having malaria are those from sub-Saharan Africa, those who are VFR, and those with platelet concentrations under 150.000/μL or headache. Arboviral disease wasmore likely in patients from Central and South America who had exanthems or joint pain. (AU)

Healthcare seeking during travel: an analysis by the GeoSentinel surveillance network of travel medicine providers.

BACKGROUND: International travellers may seek care abroad to address health problems that arise during their trip or plan healthcare outside their country of residence as medical tourists. METHODS: Data were collected on travellers evaluated at GeoSentinel Network sites who reported healthcare during travel. Both unplanned and planned healthcare were analysed, including the reason and nature of healthcare sought, characteristics of the treatment provided and outcomes. Travellers that presented for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis were described elsewhere and were excluded from detailed analysis. RESULTS: From May 2017 through June 2020, after excluding travellers obtaining rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (n= 415), 1093 travellers reported care for a medical or dental issue that was an unanticipated part of the travellers' planned itinerary (unplanned healthcare). Travellers who sought unplanned healthcare abroad had frequent diagnoses of acute diarrhoea, dengue, falciparum malaria and unspecified viral syndrome, and obtained care in 131 countries. Thirty-four (3%) reported subsequent deterioration and 230 (21%) reported no change in condition; a third (n = 405; 37%) had a pre-travel health encounter. Forty-one travellers had sufficient data on planned healthcare abroad for analysis. The most common destinations were the US, France, Dominican Republic, Belgium and Mexico. The top reasons for their planned healthcare abroad were unavailability of procedure at home (n = 9; 19%), expertise abroad (n = 9; 19%), lower cost (n = 8; 17%) and convenience (n = 7; 15%); a third (n = 13; 32%) reported cosmetic or surgical procedures. Early and late complications occurred in 14 (33%) and 4 (10%) travellers, respectively. Four travellers (10%) had a pre-travel health encounter. CONCLUSIONS: International travellers encounter health problems during travel that often could be prevented by pre-travel consultation. Travellers obtaining planned healthcare abroad can experience negative health consequences associated with treatments abroad, for which pre-travel consultations could provide advice and potentially help to prevent complications.

Impact d'une consultation de médecine des voyages sur les attitudes et les pratiques des voyageurs.

Introduction : Traveling regularly to malaria endemic areas increasingly exposes travelers to various risks which could be mitigated by a pre-travel health consultation. The objective was to study the impact of advice provided during a pre-travel consultation on travelers’ behaviors and practices to identify travelers’ profiles and adapt the prevention recommendations before trave-ling to intertropical zones.Methods : Two self-assessment questionnaires (Q1-before and Q2-after travelling) were proposed to 271 individuals over 5 months of traveler consultations to assess behaviors (Q1) and practices (Q2). Questionnaires gathered travelers’ profiles, source of information, travel diet and lifestyle, personal vector control, malaria chemoprophylaxis and other frequent risks.Results : Diet recommendations were the least followed (16 %), especially for people<55 (p<0.03) as well as Visiting Friends and Relatives (VFR) (p<0,001). A correlation between behaviors and practices for personal vector control and immunization and malaria chemoprophylaxis were found (resp. 89% and 78%). Mosquito nets and long sleeve clothes were underused. Changes of opinion resulting from concerns of potential side effects and lack of efficiency (<7%) explained the non-compliance to the pre-travel recommendations. During the stay, although 24% of travelers got sick, medical consultations (<5%) and hospital admissions (<1%) remained low. The General Practitioner remains the main point of contact (41%).Discussion : Better identifying travelers’ characteristics would allow to improve travel consultation, to refer to their knowledge and focus on preventive measures. It is crucial to highlight the importance of diet measures and insist on the low likelihood of adverse effects in Malaria Chemoprophylaxis.

[Malaria and its importance in travel medicine]. / Malaria und ihre Bedeutung in der Reisemedizin.

Malaria remains one of the most important infectious diseases worldwide. The annual number of cases is currently estimated at around 240 million globally, of which more than 500,000 cases are fatal. The majority of malaria cases in Europe are imported from the African continent. Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of malaria tropica, causes 75-90 % of all infections imported to Germany. Artemisinin-based combination therapies are the standard treatment for uncomplicated malaria worldwide. In addition to uncomplicated malaria infections, Plasmodium falciparum can cause severe malaria, characterized by vital organ dysfunction and hyperparasitaemia. The treatment of choice for severe malaria is parenteral artesunate. For all patients presenting with febrile illness after a stay in a malaria-endemic area malaria must be ruled out immediately. Microscopy of the thick drop remains the gold standard for diagnosis in clinical routine.

Risk of deaths due to injuries in travellers: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Annual global travel reached an all-time high of 1.4 billion international tourist visits in 2019. It is estimated that injury accounts for close to 25% of deaths in travellers, most of which are theoretically preventable. However, there are limited data available on injury occurrence and outcomes in travellers. Our objective was to better understand the relative risk of dying from injury that arises from the novel environments and behavioural changes associated with foreign travel. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) according to PRISMA guidelines that included studies published in English since 1990 that reported injury deaths in tourists per 100 000-person years or as a proportion of total tourist deaths in comparison to a non-traveller population. We also included studies that reported data allowing calculation of these rates. Relative rates or proportions of overall injury mortality, mortality due to traffic accidents, drowning and homicide were summarized. RESULTS: In total, 1847 articles were identified, 105 underwent full-text review, and 10 articles were suitable for data extraction. There was great variability of relative risk reported, but overall, travellers appear to have a higher risk of injury mortality than domestic populations, with relative rates of injury death ranging from 1.04 to 16.7 and proportionate mortality ratios ranging from 1.43 to 3. CONCLUSIONS: Tourists should be aware of the increased risk of dying from road traffic hazards, drowning and homicide while traveling abroad. Specific geographies and activities associated with higher risk should be emphasized. Travel medicine practitioners and organizations that send people abroad should counsel travellers regarding these risks and seek ways to reduce them, including encouraging potential risk-mitigating behaviours. There is a need to improve systems of data collection and reporting on injury deaths in travellers and to study the impact of pre-travel and institutional interventions aimed at reducing this risk.

[Collateral effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of tropical and travel medicine]. / Effets de la pandémie de Covid-19 sur la pratique de médecine tropicale et des voyages.

Undoubtedly, the COVID-19 pandemic has had impacts in many areas, including travel and by extension on daily practice in tropical and travel medicine. The intercontinental travelers in decline have been replaced by a new population of travelers who previously did not require specific consultations. SARS-CoV-2 has earned its place in the pre-travel consultation in view of the medical and administrative implications. Furthermore, the global health effects of the pandemic are broader than its direct medical consequences and should not be underestimated. The increase in malaria mortality worldwide is just one example. Preventive measures prior to exposure are more important than ever.

Indubitablement, la pandémie de Covid-19 a eu des impacts dans de nombreux domaines, notamment les voyages, et par extension sur la pratique quotidienne en médecine tropicale et des voyages. Les voyageurs intercontinentaux en diminution ont été remplacés par une nouvelle population de voyageurs qui ne nécessitait pas jusqu'alors de consultations particulières. Le SARS-CoV-2 a gagné sa place dans la consultation prévoyage au vu des implications médicales et administratives. Par ailleurs, les effets de la pandémie sur la santé globale sont plus larges que ses conséquences médicales directes et ne devraient pas être sous-estimés. L'augmentation de la mortalité due à la malaria dans le monde n'en est qu'un exemple. Les mesures préventives avant exposition sont plus que jamais d'actualité.

Travel Medicine in the Dominican Republic / La Medicina del Viajero en República Dominicana

Introduction: Travel Medicine specialty has existed for more than 40 years. However, this is practically unknown by Dominicans despite the large number of people who travel to and from our country. Methods: With the objective of determining the knowledge of Dominicans about the existence of Travel Medicine specialty and their attitudes in relation to it, we conducted a virtual survey of 8 questions, in which 2,584 Dominicans participated. Results: Despite the fact that more than 80 % of those surveyed knew that to travel to certain countries they had to take certain vaccines, less than 25 % had heard of the specialty of Traveler's Medicine. After knowing the definition and objectives of the specialty, more than 90 % of the participants considered it important to consult a specialist prior to the trip. Conclusion: The lack of knowledge of the specialty and the absence of this service in the public health system are the main barriers to the access of Dominicans to the Travel Medicine consultation. It is necessary to publicize the specialty, using scientific evidence and taking as an example the worldwide dissemination of COVID-19 through travelers, to make the population aware of the importance of pre and post-trip consultation, as well as the creation of this service in public hospitals

Introducción: la especialidad Medicina del Viajero existe hace más de 40 años. Sin embargo, esta es prácticamente desconocida por los dominicanos a pesar de la gran cantidad de personas que viajan desde y hacia nuestro país. Material y métodos: Con el objetivo de determinar el conocimiento de los dominicanos sobre la existencia de la Medicina del Viajero y sus actitudes en relación a esta, realizamos una encuesta virtual de 8 preguntas, de la cual participaron 2,584 dominicanos. Resultados: a pesar de que más del 80 % de los encuestados sabían que para viajar a determinados países debían tomar ciertas vacunas, menos del 25 % había escuchado hablar de la especialidad Medicina del Viajero. Tras conocer la definición y objetivos de la especialidad más del 90 % de los participantes consideró importante realizar una consulta previa al viaje con un especialista. Conclusión: el desconocimiento de la especialidad y la ausencia de este servicio en el sistema público de salud son las principales barreras para el acceso de los dominicanos a la consulta de Medicina del Viajero. Es necesario dar a conocer la especialidad, utilizando evidencia científica y tomando como ejemplo la difusión mundial de la COVID-19 a través de los viajeros, concienciar a la población de la importancia de la consulta pre y post viaje, así como la creación de este servicio en hospitales públicos

Ready-To-Go Questionnaire - Development and validation of a novel medical pre-travel risk stratification tool.

BACKGROUND: There are no validated pre-travel self-assessment tools to stratify travellers' health risks and identify their needs for pre-travel medical preparation. This study presents a novel pre-travel risk stratification tool (Ready-To-Go Questionnaire). METHODS: The Ready-To-Go Questionnaire was developed by travel medical experts. It assesses information on travellers' itinerary and current health status, thereby assigning travellers to one out of four risk categories. To explore the Ready-To-Go Questionnaire's validity, we analysed the agreement between the risk categories resulting from the questionnaire and predefined validation criteria. This study was carried out at the Travel Clinic, University of Zurich, Switzerland. RESULTS: One hundred travellers attending a pre-travel consultation were included. 82% corresponded to the substantial-risk category, 17% to the high-risk category, 1% to the moderate-risk category and 0% to the low-risk category. The concordance between the risk categories and the consultants' risk assessment, was 0.39 and 0.29 (unweighted/weighted Cohen's Kappa). No significant concordance was found between the risk categories and additional validation criteria. CONCLUSION: The Ready-To-Go Questionnaire is a medical triage tool developed to identify different levels of travel-related health risks. This tool assists in better understanding travellers' needs, shaping modern travel consultations and offering patient-centred travel medicine services. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10172086.

Underestimation of travel-associated risks by adult and paediatric travellers compared to expert assessment: A cross-sectional study at a hospital-based family pre-travel clinic.

BACKGROUND: Travellers' perception of their risk for acquiring travel-related conditions is an important contributor to decisions and behaviors during travel. In this study, we aimed to assess the differences between traveller-perceived and expert-assessed risk of travel-related conditions in children and adults travelling internationally and describe factors that influence travellers' perception of risk. METHODS: Children and adults were recruited at the Hospital for Sick Children's Family Travel Clinic between October 2014 and July 2015. A questionnaire was administered to participants to assess their perceived risk of acquiring 32 travel-related conditions using a 7-point Likert scale. Conditions were categorized as vector-borne diseases, vaccine-preventable diseases, food and water borne diseases, sexually transmitted infections and other conditions. Two certified travel medicine experts reviewed each patient's chart and assigned a risk score based on the same 7-point Likert scale. Traveller and expert risk scores were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: In total, 207 participants were enrolled to participate in this study, 97 children (self-reported, n = 8; parent-reported, n = 89), and 110 adults. Travel-related risk for adults and parents answering for their children were significantly underestimated when compared to expert-assessed risk for 26 of the 32 assessed conditions. The underestimated conditions were the same for both adults and parents answering for children. Travel-related risk was not over-estimated for any condition. CONCLUSIONS: Adults underestimated their children's and their own risk for most travel-related conditions. Strategies to improve the accuracy of risk perception of travel-related conditions by travellers are needed to optimize healthy travel for children and their families.

Pretravel plans and discrepant trip experiences among travelers attending a tertiary care centre family travel medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND: International travel can expose travelers to a number of health risks. Pretravel consultation (PC) helps mitigate risk and prepare travelers for health concerns that might arise. The assessment of risk, mitigation strategies, and relevance of pretravel advice is dependent on how closely travelers adhere to their planned travel itinerary and activities. We determined the proportion of returned travelers whose completed travel experiences differed from their stated travel itineraries, and identified discrepancies that significantly altered the traveler's health risk and would have required alternative counseling during their PC. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at the SickKids' Family Travel Clinic between October 2014 and November 2015. Returned travelers who completed a post-travel survey were included. Pretravel consultation assessments and post-trip surveys were compared to identify discrepant trip experiences. RESULTS: A total of 389 travelers presented to the clinic for a PC during the study period and 302 (77.6%) were enrolled. Post-travel surveys were received from 119 (39.4%) participants, representing 101 unique itineraries. The median participant age was 36.3 years (IQR 26.6-47.5) and there were 73 female travelers (61%). Most participants (n = 87,73%) were healthy as well as Canadian born (n = 84, 71%). A quarter of travelers were visiting friends and relatives (VFR) (n = 30, 25.2%). The vast majority of returned travelers (n = 109, 92%) reported discrepant trip experiences involving trip duration, countries visited, accommodations, environmental surroundings and/or activities. Almost two thirds of these individuals (n = 68, 62%) would have required alternative pretravel counseling. We did not identify any demographic or planned trip characteristics that predicted discrepant trip experiences requiring alternative pretravel counseling. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of travelers reported discrepant trip experiences and the discrepancies often affected health risk. Therefore, clinicians should consider providing broader counselling during the PC as discrepancies from planned travel are common.

Travel medicine meets conservation medicine in St. Kitts: Disinhibition, cognitive-affective inconsistency, and disease risk among vacationers around green monkeys (Chlorocebus sabaeus).

Despite concern about environmental protection, travelers often underestimate the contribution they may have to disease transmission to other species, as well as the risk of becoming infected themselves. Tourists in general tend to accept more physical risks when traveling than when at home, and much of this can be blamed on the temporary loss of situational awareness and loss of inhibition with a corresponding relaxed attitude toward safety. To better understand environmental attitudes and travel health knowledge and behaviors, a detailed survey of adult tourists was distributed on the island of St. Kitts, home to many green monkeys. Data from 1097 respondents were collected at two locations where cruise ship passengers typically visit the island. Results revealed that even though individuals with more positive environmental attitudes were more willing to take steps to mitigate tourism-related disease transmission, they were also more likely to report wanting to touch or feed a monkey/ape. Similarly, those more willing to prevent the spread of diseases (e.g., wear a mask and report any illnesses to park authorities) were actually more likely to want to touch or feed a monkey/ape. The human desire for physical contact with other species may be partly the result of biophilia, emotionally arousing events (like contact with exotic species) that can lead to further disinhibition, and social media platforms that provide opportunities for exhibitionism. The attitude-behavior incongruency identified here may also be explained through cognitive-affective inconsistency: environmentally-oriented individuals believe that it is prudent to take steps to prevent zoonotic disease transmission but also desire to touch or feed exotic species as it may be emotionally rewarding. Individuals for whom physically interacting with monkeys/apes may be emotionally rewarding may not alter their behavior in response to cognitive means of persuasion; techniques aimed at appealing to emotions may be more effective.

Barriers to seeking health care among returning travellers with malaria: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to seeking health care among returning travellers with malaria with the aim of developing targeted interventions that improve early health care-seeking behaviour, diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of published medical literature, selecting studies that investigated and reported barriers to seeking health care among returning travellers and migrants with malaria. In total, 633 articles were screened, of which four studies met the inclusion criteria after a full-text review. RESULTS: The four studies reported barriers to seeking healthcare among returning travellers in China, the United States, Thailand and the Dominican Republic. Three studies had an observational design. The identified barriers were summarised based on the appraisal delay, illness delay and utilisation delay stages. During appraisal delays, low awareness of malaria was the most significant factor. Once the patient assessed that he or she was ill, belonging to a specific minority ethnicity, being infected with P. vivax and receiving a low level of social support were predictors of delayed health care-seeking. Finally, the most significant factor associated with utilisation delays was the monetary cost. CONCLUSION: The health care-seeking behaviour of returning travellers with malaria should be further investigated and improved. Addressing the identified barriers and gaps in health care-seeking behaviour among returning travellers with malaria, particularly among groups at high risk of travel-associated infections, is important to prevent severe disease and deaths as well as secondary transmission and epidemics.