Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine has analgesic properties, but the intraoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine is often masked by the effects of other general anaesthetics. Therefore, the degree to which it reduces intraoperative pain intensity remains unclear. The objective of this double-blind, randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the independent intraoperative analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine in real-time. METHODS: This single-centre study enrolled 181 patients who were hospitalised for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries between 19 January 2021 to 3 August 2021 were eligible for this is single-centre study. Peripheral neural block was performed on patients scheduled for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine or midazolam group and were intravenously administered with 1.5 µg kg-1 h-1 dexmedetomidine or 50 µg kg-1 h-1 midazolam, respectively. The analgesic efficacy was evaluated using the real-time non-invasive nociception monitoring. The primary endpoint was the attainment rate of the nociception index target. The secondary endpoints included the occurrence of intraoperative hypoxemia, haemodynamic parameters, the consciousness index, electromyography and patient outcomes. RESULTS: On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the defined nociception index target was attained in 95.45% and 40.91% of patients receiving dexmedetomidine and midazolam, respectively. Log-rank analysis revealed that the dexmedetomidine group attained the nociception index target significantly faster and the median attainment time of the nociception index target in the dexmedetomidine group was 15 min. Dexmedetomidine group was associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia. There was no significant difference in blood pressure between the dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups. Further, the dexmedetomidine group had a lower maximum visual analogue scale score and lower analgesic consumption postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine has independent analgesia and systemically administered as an adjuvant agent has better analgesic efficacy than midazolam without severe side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov Registry Identifier: NCT-04675372.Registered on 19/12 /2020.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Sedation in Children.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the quality of sedation and additional clinically-meaningful outcomes associated with different intranasal dexmedetomidine-based regimens in children undergoing nonpainful procedures. METHODS: A multicenter prospective observational study of children aged 2 months to 17 years undergoing intranasal dexmedetomidine sedation for MRI, auditory brainstem response testing, echocardiogram, EEG, or computed tomography scan. Regimens varied by dose of dexmedetomidine and use of adjunct sedatives. Quality of sedation was assessed using the Pediatric Sedation State Scale and by determining proportion of children who achieved an acceptable sedation state. Procedure completion, time-based outcomes, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 578 children across 7 sites. Median age was 2.5 years (interquartile range 1.6-3) and 37.5% were female. The most common procedures were auditory brainstem response testing (54.3%) and MRI (22.8%). The most common dose was 3 to 3.9 mcg/kg (55%), with 25.1% and 14.2% of children receiving oral or intranasal midazolam, respectively. Acceptable sedation state and procedure completion was achieved in 81.1% and 91.3% of children, and mean time to onset of sedation and total sedation time were 32.3 and 114.8 minutes, respectively. Twelve interventions were performed in 10 patients in response to an event; no patients required a serious airway, breathing, or cardiovascular intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine-based regimens can achieve acceptable sedation states and high rates of procedure completion in children undergoing sedation for nonpainful procedures. Our findings delineate clinical outcomes associated with intranasal dexmedetomidine-based sedation that can be used to guide the implementation and optimization of such regimens.

Low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of multiple sclerosis fatigue (INKLING-MS): Study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, currently-used medications for the treatment of fatigue probably do not work better than a placebo. In a pilot trial, we showed that one infusion of low-dose ketamine significantly improved fatigue severity measured four weeks after the infusion. METHODS: The proposed study is a single-center, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-placebo-controlled trial of intravenous low-dose ketamine in patients with MS fatigue. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 into three groups: receiving either one or two infusions of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min) or zero to one infusion of the active placebo (midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg over 40 min). Eligibility criteria include adult patients diagnosed with MS based on the latest criteria, complaining of fatigue as one of the main symptoms, and having a screening MFIS score higher than a pre-specified threshold. RESULTS: One hundred and ten participants will be randomized over 30 months at Johns Hopkins MS Center. Complete enrollment is expected by mid-2025. The study's primary outcome will be the MFIS score at the end of week 4, comparing two-thirds of the participants who received ketamine with one-third who received midazolam. The secondary and exploratory outcomes (measured four weeks after the second infusion) will show how long the effects of a single infusion last and if two infusions of ketamine are better than one in improving MS fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study can show whether intervening in the glutamatergic pathways would improves MS fatigue.

Functional connectivity signatures of NMDAR dysfunction in schizophrenia-integrating findings from imaging genetics and pharmaco-fMRI.

Both, pharmacological and genome-wide association studies suggest N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction and excitatory/inhibitory (E/I)-imbalance as a major pathophysiological mechanism of schizophrenia. The identification of shared fMRI brain signatures of genetically and pharmacologically induced NMDAR dysfunction may help to define biomarkers for patient stratification. NMDAR-related genetic and pharmacological effects on functional connectivity were investigated by integrating three different datasets: (A) resting state fMRI data from 146 patients with schizophrenia genotyped for the disease-associated genetic variant rs7191183 of GRIN2A (encoding the NMDAR 2 A subunit) as well as 142 healthy controls. (B) Pharmacological effects of the NMDAR antagonist ketamine and the GABA-A receptor agonist midazolam were obtained from a double-blind, crossover pharmaco-fMRI study in 28 healthy participants. (C) Regional gene expression profiles were estimated using a postmortem whole-brain microarray dataset from six healthy donors. A strong resemblance was observed between the effect of the genetic variant in schizophrenia and the ketamine versus midazolam contrast of connectivity suggestive for an associated E/I-imbalance. This similarity became more pronounced for regions with high density of NMDARs, glutamatergic neurons, and parvalbumin-positive interneurons. From a functional perspective, increased connectivity emerged between striato-pallido-thalamic regions and cortical regions of the auditory-sensory-motor network, while decreased connectivity was observed between auditory (superior temporal gyrus) and visual processing regions (lateral occipital cortex, fusiform gyrus, cuneus). Importantly, these imaging phenotypes were associated with the genetic variant, the differential effect of ketamine versus midazolam and schizophrenia (as compared to healthy controls). Moreover, the genetic variant was associated with language-related negative symptomatology which correlated with disturbed connectivity between the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and the superior lateral occipital cortex. Shared genetic and pharmacological functional connectivity profiles were suggestive of E/I-imbalance and associated with schizophrenia. The identified brain signatures may help to stratify patients with a common molecular disease pathway providing a basis for personalized psychiatry.

Midazolam versus morphine in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema patients with and without atrial fibrillation: findings from the MIMO trial.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The MIMO clinical trial showed that patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) treated with midazolam had fewer serious adverse events than those treated with morphine. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in heart failure and affects patient's outcome. OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of this substudy is to know if AF modified the reduced risk of serious adverse events in the midazolam arm compared to morphine. The first secondary endpoint is to know if AF modified the reduced risk of serious adverse events or death at 30 days in the midazolam arm. The second secondary objective of this substudy is to analyze whether AF modified the reduced risk of midazolam against morphine on the total number of serious adverse events per patient. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of the MIMO trial. Patients more than 18 years old clinically diagnosed with ACPE and with dyspnea and anxiety were randomized (1:1) at emergency department arrival to receive either intravenous midazolam or morphine. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: In this post hoc analysis, we calculated the relative risk (RR) of serious adverse events in patients with and without AF. Calculating the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel interaction test, we evaluated if AF modified the reduced risk of serious adverse events in the midazolam arm compared to morphine. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients (median = 78.9 years; IQR, 72.3-83.7; women, 52.2%) were randomized in the MIMO trial, 55 to receive midazolam and 56 to morphine. All randomized patients received the assigned drug and there were no losses to follow-up. Forty-four patients (39.6%) had AF. In the AF group, the RR for the incidence of serious adverse events in the midazolam versus morphine arm was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.14-1.3). In the group without AF, the RR was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.21-1). The presence of AF did not modify the reduced risk of serious adverse events in the midazolam arm compared with morphine ( P for interaction = 0.88). CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis of the MIMO trial suggests that the reduced risk of serious adverse events in the midazolam group compared to morphine is similar in patients with and without AF.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations.

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

Effects of midazolam vs morphine in patients with acute pulmonary edema with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a secondary analysis of data from the MIMO trial. / Efectos del midazolam frente a la morfina en pacientes con edema agudo de pulmón con disfunción sistólica ventricular izquierda: un análisis secundario del ensayo MIMO.

OBJECTIVES: The midazolam vs morphine (MIMO) trial showed that patients treated with midazolam had fewer serious adverse events than those treated with morphine. In many patients with acute pulmonary edema, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved, at 50% or higher. We aimed to determine whether left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (D), defined by an LVEF of less than 50%, modifies the protective effect of midazolam vs morphine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MIMO trial randomized 111 patients with acute pulmonary edema to receive intravenous midazolam in 1-mg doses to a maximum of 3 mg (n = 55) or morphine in 2- to 4-mg doses to a maximum of 8 mg (n= 56). We calculated the relative risk (RR) for a serious adverse event in patients with and without systolic LVD. RESULTS: LVEF was preserved in 84 (75.7%) of the patients with acute pulmonary edema. In patients with systolic LVD, 4 patients (26.9%) in the midazolam arm vs 6 (50%) in the morphine arm developed serious adverse events (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.2-1.4). In patients without systolic LVD, 6 patients (15%) in the midazolam arm vs 18 (40.9%) in the morphine arm experienced such events (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.83). The presence of systolic LVD did not modify the protective effect of midazolam on serious adverse effects (P=.57). CONCLUSION: The effect of midazolam vs morphine in protecting against the development of serious adverse events or death is similar in patients with and without systolic LVD.

OBJETIVO: El ensayo clínico MIMO demostró que los pacientes con edema agudo de pulmón (EAP) tratados con midazolam tenían menos eventos adversos graves (EAG) que los tratados con morfina. Muchos pacientes con EAP tienen fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) preservada ($ 50%). El objetivo fue conocer si la disfunción sistólica ventricular izquierda (DSVI) (fracción eyección ventrículo izquierdo 50%) modifica el efecto protector del midazolam frente a la morfina. METODO: El estudio MIMO asignó al azar 111 pacientes con EAP a tratamiento con midazolam (dosis de 1 mg intravenosa, hasta una dosis máxima de 3 mg, n = 55) o morfina (dosis de 2-4 mg, hasta una dosis máxima de 8 mg, n = 56). Se calculó el riesgo relativo (RR) de padecer un EAG en pacientes con y sin DSVI. RESULTADOS: La FEVI preservada estuvo presente en 84 (75,7%) pacientes con EAP. En el grupo con DSVI, 4 pacientes (26,9%) en el brazo midazolam frente a 6 (50%) en el brazo morfina presentaron EAG (RR = 0,53; IC 95: 0,2-1,4). En el grupo sin DSVI 6 pacientes (15%) del brazo midazolam frente a 18 (40,9%) del brazo morfina presentaron EAG (RR = 0,37; IC 95: 0,16-0,83). La DSVI no modificó el efecto protector del midazolam en la aparición de EAG con respecto a la morfina (p = 0,57). CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con EAP el efecto protector del midazolam sobre la morfina en la aparición de EAG y EAG o muerte fue similar en pacientes con y sin DSVI.

Histamine H1 receptor antagonist attenuates catecholamine surge and organ injury after severe burns.

Severe burns induce a catecholamine surge, causing severe damage to the organism and raising the possibility of multisystem organ failure. Few strategies are generally acceptable to reduce catecholamine surge and organ injury post-burn. We have previously shown that histamine can amplify the catecholamine surge. In addition, promethazine, a first-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist, alleviates catecholamine surge and organ injury after severe burns in rats. However, evidence is lacking on whether promethazine benefits patients after severe burns. Currently, sedation and analgesia (such as midazolam and fentanyl) are commonly required for patients after severe burns. It remains unclear if patients after severe burns derive clinical benefit from histamine H1 receptor antagonists combined with sedation and analgesia. This study investigates the therapeutic effect of promethazine on patients after severe burns. Moreover, we test the therapeutic effect of cetirizine, a second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist, combined with sedation and analgesia in rats after severe burns. We find that promethazine-pethidine treatment shows a tendency for a lower level of total bilirubin than midazolam-fentanyl in patients 7-day after severe burn. Our study confirms that cetirizine combined with midazolam and fentanyl reduces catecholamine surge and liver and lung damage after severe burns in rats; the effects are better than midazolam and fentanyl treatment. In summary, for the first time, we suggest that histamine H1 receptor antagonist has the potential clinical value of reducing liver injury in patients after severe burns. In addition, we reveal that cetirizine combined with midazolam and fentanyl may be an ideal strategy for treating severe burns.

The Relationship Between Acute Dissociative Effects Induced by Ketamine and Treatment Response in Adolescent Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Objective: Ketamine has proven effective as a rapid-acting antidepressant agent. Several adult studies have investigated the association between ketamine's acute dissociative effects and depression response, but no studies have examined the association in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 16 adolescent participants who participated in a randomized, single-dose, midazolam-controlled crossover trial of ketamine in adolescents with depression. We examined the association between the acute dissociative symptoms (measured at 60 minutes following start of infusion using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale [CADSS], and its three subscales: depersonalization, derealization, amnesia) and response and depression symptom improvement at 1'day (using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale). Results: Within the ketamine group, there were no significant associations between dissociation symptoms or CADSS subscale scores and magnitude of depression symptom improvement or likelihood of ketamine response. When receiving midazolam, there was no significant association between overall dissociation symptoms and magnitude or likelihood of response of depressive symptoms. Higher levels of symptoms on the 'depersonalization' CADSS subscale when receiving midazolam were associated with less improvement in depression symptoms at 1 day following infusion. Conclusions: In contrast to some adult literature, the current data do not show a relationship between acute dissociative effects and antidepressant response to ketamine in pediatric patients with TRD. Interpretation may be limited by the small sample size, reducing the power to detect small or medium associations. Future research should utilize larger samples to more definitively measure the magnitude of association between acute dissociative symptoms and later antidepressant response to ketamine and to assess the relationship to trial design (e.g., crossover vs. parallel trial, comparison condition utilized and number of infusions) within both adult and pediatric populations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02579928.

A comparative evaluation of intranasal α2-adrenoceptor agonists and intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric sedation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Midazolam and α2-adrenoceptor agonists have been widely used off-label as intranasal sedatives for children. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of two interventions in pediatric sedation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2022. All randomized controlled trials used intranasal α2-adrenoceptor agonists and midazolam as sedatives in children were enrolled. Parental separation, anesthesia induction or facemask acceptance, sedation level, different hemodynamic parameters and adverse events were considered as outcomes. RESULTS: Totally 21 studies with 1,495 patients were included. Only one study reported comparison between midazolam and clonidine met the inclusion criteria, and patients in clonidine group had significantly better mask acceptance compared to midazolam group. Compared with midazolam, using of dexmedetomidine was associated with higher rate of satisfactory parental separation (52.88% vs 75.18%, RR = 0.70, with 95%CI [0.55, 0.90]), anesthesia induction or facemask acceptance (60.92% vs 81.47%, RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.68, 0.84]) and less incidence of postoperative pain and nasal irritation. CONCLUSION: Compared with midazolam, dexmedetomidine should be considered as the preferred intranasal sedative option for pediatric patients, since it provides more satisfactory sedative level with less incidence of several side effects. But insufficient evidences about effects of intranasal clonidine and overall low and moderate quality evidences evaluated by GRADE system indicate that superiority of intranasal α2-adrenoceptor agonists in pediatric sedation needs to be validated by more studies with high quality and large sample size in future.

Efectos del midazolam frente a la morfina en pacientes con edema agudo de pulmón con disfunción sistólica ventricular izquierda: un análisis secundario del ensayo MIMO / Effects of midazolam vs morphine in patients with acute pulmonary edema with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a secondary analysis of data from the MIMO trial

Objetivo. El ensayo clínico MIMO demostró que los pacientes con edema agudo de pulmón (EAP) tratados con midazolam tenían menos eventos adversos graves (EAG) que los tratados con morfina. Muchos pacientes con EAP tienen fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) preservada ($ 50%). El objetivo fue conocer si la disfunción sistólica ventricular izquierda (DSVI) (fracción eyección ventrículo izquierdo < 50%) modifica el efecto protector del midazolam frente a la morfina.Método. El estudio MIMO asignó al azar 111 pacientes con EAP a tratamiento con midazolam (dosis de 1 mg intravenosa, hasta una dosis máxima de 3 mg, n = 55) o morfina (dosis de 2-4 mg, hasta una dosis máxima de 8 mg, n = 56). Se calculó el riesgo relativo (RR) de padecer un EAG en pacientes con y sin DSVI.Resultado. La FEVI preservada estuvo presente en 84 (75,7%) pacientes con EAP. En el grupo con DSVI, 4 pacientes (26,9%) en el brazo midazolam frente a 6 (50%) en el brazo morfina presentaron EAG (RR = 0,53; IC 95: 0,2-1,4). En el grupo sin DSVI 6 pacientes (15%) del brazo midazolam frente a 18 (40,9%) del brazo morfina presentaron EAG (RR = 0,37; IC 95: 0,16-0,83). La DSVI no modificó el efecto protector del midazolam en la aparición de EAG con respecto a la morfina (p = 0,57)Conclusiones. En pacientes con EAP el efecto protector del midazolam sobre la morfina en la aparición de EAG y EAG o muerte fue similar en pacientes con y sin DSVI. (AU)

Background and objective. The midazolam vs morphine (MIMO) trial showed that patients treated with midazolam had fewer serious adverse events than those treated with morphine. In many patients with acute pulmonary edema, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved, at 50% or higher. We aimed to determine whether left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (D), defined by an LVEF of less than 50%, modifies the protective effect of midazolam vs morphine. Methods. The MIMO trial randomized 111 patients with acute pulmonary edema to receive intravenous midazolam in 1-mg doses to a maximum of 3 mg (n = 55) or morphine in 2- to 4-mg doses to a maximum of 8 mg (n= 56). We calculated the relative risk (RR) for a serious adverse event in patients with and without systolic LVD. Results. LVEF was preserved in 84 (75.7%) of the patients with acute pulmonary edema. In patients with systolic LVD, 4 patients (26.9%) in the midazolam arm vs 6 (50%) in the morphine arm developed serious adverse events (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.2-1.4). In patients without systolic LVD, 6 patients (15%) in the midazolam arm vs 18 (40.9%) in the morphine arm experienced such events (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.83). The presence of systolic LVD did not modify the protective effect of midazolam on serious adverse effects (P=.57). Conclusions. The effect of midazolam vs morphine in protecting against the development of serious adverse eventsor death is similar in patients with and without systolic LVD. (AU)

Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND (p < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI (p < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. CONCLUSION: IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Oral triclofos (TRI) and intranasal midazolam (INM) have been used for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI with variable success; but the experience with intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is limited. WHAT IS NEW: • IND provides more effective sedation compared to INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI, without any significant adverse events.

Application of low-dose etomidate combined with oxycodone and midazolam in endoscopic injection sclerotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adverse effects and particularly the anesthetic effect of low-dose etomidate combined with oxycodone and midazolam in endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We herein report a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. It included patients with liver cirrhosis (age, 18 - 65 years; BMI, 18 - 25 kg/m2) who were treated with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, and the patients were randomly assigned to the propofol group or the etomidate group. The incidence of respiratory depression was the primary outcome measure. The occurrence of various adverse effects and endoscopist satisfaction score were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: In this study, we enrolled a total of 96 patients. The incidence of respiratory depression in the propofol group was 19%, while that in the etomidate group was only 4% (9/47 vs. 2/49; p = 0.026). Regarding the secondary outcome measures, the incidence of hypoxia in the propofol group was 15%, while that in the etomidate group was only 2% (7/47 vs. 1/49; p = 0.029). Injection-site pain occurred in 0% and 23% of the patients in the etomidate group and propofol group, respectively (p < 0.001). Endoscopist satisfaction scores were classified as "poor", "fair", "good", and "very good". The scores were 17% higher (46/49 vs. 36/47; p = 0.026) for the "very good" level and 15% lower (3/49 vs. 10/47; p = 0.038) for the "good" level in the etomidate group than in the propofol group. CONCLUSION: Low-dose etomidate combined with oxycodone and midazolam for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy could reduce the incidence of hypoxia without increasing the incidence of complications.

A "middle-out approach" for the prediction of human drug disposition from preclinical data using simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.

Simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models using estimated tissue-to-unbound plasma partition coefficients (Kpus) were previously investigated by fitting them to in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) data. After optimization with preclinical data, the performance of these models for extrapolation of distribution kinetics to human were evaluated to determine the best approach for the prediction of human drug disposition and volume of distribution (Vss) using PBPK modeling. Three lipophilic bases were tested (diazepam, midazolam, and basmisanil) for which intravenous PK data were available in rat, monkey, and human. The models with Kpu scalars using k-means clustering were generally the best for fitting data in the preclinical species and gave plausible Kpu values. Extrapolations of plasma concentrations for diazepam and midazolam using these models and parameters obtained were consistent with the observed clinical data. For diazepam and midazolam, the human predictions of Vss after optimization in rats and monkeys were better compared with the Vss estimated from the traditional PBPK modeling approach (varying from 1.1 to 3.1 vs. 3.7-fold error). For basmisanil, the sparse preclinical data available could have affected the model performance for fitting and the subsequent extrapolation to human. Overall, this work provides a rational strategy to predict human drug distribution using preclinical PK data within the PBPK modeling strategy.

Sedative effect with the combination of butorphanol and midazolam on two-dimensional shear wave elastography of pancreas and kidney in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sedative effect of a combination of butorphanol and midazolam on 2-D shear wave elastography (SWE) of the kidneys and pancreas in dogs. ANIMALS: 8 clinically healthy dogs. PROCEDURES: We conducted a 2-D SWE examination of the bilateral kidneys and the pancreas before and after IV of 0.2 mg/kg butorphanol and 0.1 mg/kg midazolam in each dog. We performed 2-D SWE on the left kidney via a subcostal approach with the dog in right lateral recumbency, on the right kidney via the intercostal approach with the dog in left lateral recumbency, and on the right lobe of the pancreas via the subcostal approach. Subsequently, the pancreas and kidney shear wave velocities (SWV) pre- and postsedation were compared. RESULTS: On qualitative evaluation using color mapping, the pancreas and kidneys showed a homogeneous blue-to-green color in pre- and post-sedation 2-D SWE. There was no significant difference in SWV pre- and post-sedation in the pancreas and kidneys. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intravenous administration of a combination of 0.2 mg/kg butorphanol and 0.1 mg/kg midazolam did not change the 2-D SWE of the pancreas and kidneys significantly. The combination of butorphanol and midazolam can be used in healthy dogs for 2-D SWE evaluation of the pancreas and kidneys, especially when the patient is uncooperative during the examination.

Autophagy impairment is involved in midazolam-induced lipid droplet accumulation and consequent phagocytosis decrease in BV2 cells.

An increasing number of experimental and clinical observation suggest that the use of anaesthetics is closely associated with postoperative central nervous system (CNS) complications, such as delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Brain energy rescue is an emerging therapeutic strategy for central nervous system disease (CNSDs). However, the effect of anaesthetics on nerve cell energy utilisation, especially microglia, and its potential effects on cell function still unclear. Elucidating the effects of anaesthetics on lipid droplets, which are specific lipid storage organs, and phagocytosis of microglia is crucial to discover a new therapeutic concept for postoperative CNS complications. Here, we studied the effects of the commonly used anaesthetic midazolam on lipid droplets and phagocytosis in immortalised microglial BV2 cells. Lipid droplets were assessed by flow cytometry and triglyceride quantification. The phagocytosis of BV2 cells was evaluated by detecting their phagocytosis by latex beads. Additionally, the autophagy of BV2 cells was evaluated by western blot and observation under microscopy. Our results showed that midazolam caused lipid droplet accumulation and reduced phagocytosis in BV2 cells, and inhibition of lipid droplet accumulation partially restored phagocytosis. Furthermore, midazolam blocks autophagic degradation by increasing phosphorylated TFEB in BV2 cells, inhibition of midazolam-increased phosphorylated TFEB might contribute to the improvement of autophagic flux by rapamycin. Moreover, promoting autophagy reverse the lipid droplet accumulation and phagocytosis decrease. This study suggests autophagy is a target for attenuating lipid droplet accumulation, normal degradation of lipid droplets is important for maintaining microglia phagocytosis and attenuating the side effects of midazolam on the CNS.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil.

PURPOSE: Regulations have broadened to allow moderate sedation administration for gastrointestinal endoscopy by non-anesthesia personnel. The line between moderate and deep sedation is ambiguous. Deep sedation offers patient comfort as well as greater safety concerns. Unintended deep sedation can occur if drug interactions are overlooked. We present a pharmacodynamic model for moderate sedation using midazolam, alfentanil and propofol. The model is suitable for training and devising rationales for appropriate dosing. METHODS: The study consists of two parts: modeling and validation. In modeling, patients scheduled for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy sedation are enrolled. The modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S) score < 4 is defined as loss of response to represent moderate sedation. Two patient groups receiving bronchoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are used for validation. Model performance is assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). Simulations are performed to demonstrate how the model is used to rationally determine drug regimen for moderate sedation. RESULTS: Interaction between propofol and alfentanil is stronger than the other pairwise combinations. Additional synergy is observed with three drugs. ROC AUC is 0.83 for the modeling group, and 0.96 and 0.93 for ERCP and bronchoscopy groups respectively. Model simulation suggests that 1 mg midazolam, 250 µg alfentanil and propofol maximally benefits from drug interactions and suitable for moderate sedation. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the accurate prediction of a three-drug response surface model for moderate sedation and simulation suggests a rational dosing strategy for moderate sedation with midazolam, alfentanil and propofol.

[Analysis of the effect of midazolam on pain in a rat model of lumbar disc herniation based on the p38 MAPK signaling pathway].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of midazolam on pain in lumbar disc herniation model rats based on p38 MAPK signaling pathway. METHODS: Fifty SPF-grade Sprague-Dawley healthy rats, half male and half female, were selected and randomly divided into normal group, model group, and low-dose, medium-dose, high-dose groups. Model group and low-dose, medium-dose, high-dose groups were initially modeled for lumbar disc herniation. Intraperitoneal injection of saline was performed in rats of normal and model groups; and in the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups, intraperitoneal injection of midazolam was performed with doses of 30, 60, and 90 mg/kg, respectively. Interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), ß-endorphin (ß-EP), substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NPY) were detected in the serum of rats by enzyme-linked immunoassay. The expression of p38 MAPK and matrix metalloproteinase-3(MMP-3) protein were detected by Western blot in the tissues of rats of each group. RESULTS: The levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß and ß-EP were higher and the level of 5-HT was lower in the model group than in the normal group(P<0.05);the levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß and ß-EP were lower and the level of 5-HT was higher in the low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose groups than in the model group(P<0.05). The levels of SP and NPY increased in the model group compared with the normal group (P<0.05) and the levels of SP and NPY decreased in the low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose groups compared with the model group (P<0.05). The expression of p38 MAPK and MMP-3 increased in the model group compared with the normal group (P<0.05); the expression of p38 MAPK and MMP-3 decreased in the low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose compared with the model group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Midazolam may ameliorate the immune inflammatory response in rats with a model of lumbar disc herniation, possibly regulated through the p38MAPK signaling pathway.

Efficacy of median nerve hydrodissection by hyalase versus midazolam in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Background: The objective was to determine which of midazolam or hyalase could improve the pain score and functional disability in median nerve hydrodissection. Methods: In a double-blind study with two groups, both received bupivacaine 15 mg with either 300 IU hyalase in 2 ml of saline (group HA) or 2 mg of midazolam in 2 ml of sterile saline (group MZ). Results: Statistically significantly lower post-injection Visual Analog Scale scores in group MZ compared with group HA at all follow-ups. Group MZ had significantly lower functional disability scores than group HA. Conclusion: Both drugs yielded favorable results. Midazolam was more impactful in alleviating pain and reducing functional disability up to 6 months.