RESUMO
Individuals who have survived an overdose often have myriad needs that extend far beyond their drug use. The social determinants of health (SDOH) framework has been underutilized throughout the opioid overdose crisis, despite widespread acknowledgment that SDOH are contributors to the majority of health outcomes. Post Overdose Response Teams (PORTs) engage with individuals who have experienced 1 or more nonfatal overdoses and bear witness to the many ways in which overdose survivors experience instability with healthcare, housing, employment, and family structure. Employing a harm reduction model, PORTs are well-positioned to reach people who use drugs (PWUD) and to address gaps in basic needs on an individualized basis, including providing social support and a sense of personal connection during a period of heightened vulnerability. The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) PORT program is a harm reduction initiative that utilizes law enforcement data and several public databases to obtain accurate referral information and has been active since 2019 in NYC. This PORT program offers various services from overdose prevention education and resources, referrals to health and treatment services, and support services to overdose survivors and individuals within their social network. This perspective paper provides an in-depth overview of the program and shares quantitative and qualitative findings from the pilot phase and Year 1 of the program collected via client referral data, interviews, and case note reviews. It also examines the barriers and successes the program encountered during the pilot phase and Year 1. The team's approach to addressing complex needs is centered around human connection and working toward addressing SDOH one individualized solution at a time. Application of the NYSDOH PORT model as outlined has the potential to create significant positive impacts on the lives of PWUD, while potentially becoming a new avenue to reduce SDOH-related issues among PWUD.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Redução do Dano , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos , New York , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Apoio Social , Usuários de Drogas/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , FemininoRESUMO
There has been an overall increase in the number of suspected suicide attempts by self-poisoning among the adolescent population. Incidences of self-poisoning have increased since the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, particularly among patients age 10 to 19 years. Common agents used in self-poisoning include over-the-counter and prescription medications. It is crucial to identify adolescent patients with risk factors and provide appropriate resources to reduce the likelihood of intentional toxic ingestion. This article aims to summarize the current state of intentional toxic ingestions by adolescents, provide an overview of the most common agents implicated in self-poisoning, and discuss the best practices in screening patients. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(9):e330-e336.].
Assuntos
Tentativa de Suicídio , Humanos , Adolescente , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Intoxicação/epidemiologia , Intoxicação/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Criança , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/intoxicaçãoRESUMO
In the midst of the opioid crisis in the US, efforts to mitigate overdose risks have become paramount, leading some states to introduce mandates for coprescribing the life-saving overdose reversal drug naloxone. These mandates were designed to specifically address people receiving opioid analgesics who had an elevated risk for overdose. This included people receiving high opioid dosages, those concurrently using benzodiazepines, or those with a history of substance use disorder or overdose. Using a nationally representative, multipayer cohort of patients receiving prescription opioids, we investigated how naloxone codispensing rates changed at the state level from 2016 to 2021 among patients with an elevated risk for overdose. Then we used controlled interrupted time series analyses to assess mandates' longitudinal impact on naloxone codispensing in ten states that implemented mandates. We observed an immediate and significant increase in the naloxone codispensing rates in eight states after the implementation of mandates. Nevertheless, in five of these states, the codispensing rates exhibited a subsequent downward trend after the initial increase. State mandates show potential for improving naloxone codispensing; however, mandates alone might not be adequate for sustained change. Further research is needed to identify strategies complementing and enhancing the impact of mandates in combating the overdose crisis.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Overdose de Drogas , Naloxona , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
We examined a natural history of opioid overdose deaths from 1999-2021 in the United States to describe state-level spatio-temporal heterogeneity in the waves of the epidemic. We obtained overdose death counts by state from 1999-2021, categorized as involving prescription opioids, heroin, synthetic opioids, or unspecified drugs. We developed a Bayesian multivariate multiple change point model to flexibly estimate the timing and magnitude of state-specific changes in death rates involving each drug type. We found substantial variability around the timing and severity of each wave across states. The first wave of prescription-involved deaths started between 1999 and 2005, the second wave of heroin-involved deaths started between 2010 and 2014, and the third wave of synthetic opioid-involved deaths started between 2014 and 2021. The severity of the second and third waves was greater in states in the eastern half of the country. Our study highlights state-level variation in the timing and severity of the waves of the opioid epidemic by presenting a 23-year natural history of opioid overdose mortality in the United States. While reinforcing the general notion of three waves, we find that states did not uniformly experience the impacts of each wave.
Assuntos
Overdose de Opiáceos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Overdose de Opiáceos/mortalidade , Overdose de Opiáceos/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Teorema de Bayes , Heroína/intoxicação , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fentanyl is increasingly pervasive in the unregulated drug supply and is a driver of drug overdose deaths in the United States. The aims of this study were to characterize and identify correlates of fentanyl preference among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Rhode Island (RI). METHODS: Using bivariate analysis, we examined associations between fentanyl preference and sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics at baseline among participants enrolled in the RI Prescription Drug and Illicit Drug Study from August 2020-February 2023. Fentanyl preference was operationalized based on responses to a five-point Likert scale: "I prefer using fentanyl or drugs that have fentanyl in them." Participants who responded that they "strongly disagree," "disagree," or were "neutral" with respect to this statement were classified as not preferring fentanyl, whereas participants who responded that they "agree" or "strongly agree" were classified as preferring fentanyl. RESULTS: Among 506 PWUD eligible for inclusion in this analysis, 15% expressed a preference for fentanyl or drugs containing fentanyl as their drug of choice. In bivariate analyses, preference for fentanyl was positively associated with younger age, white race, lifetime history of overdose, history of injection drug use, past month enrollment in a substance use treatment program, past month treatment with medications for opioid use disorder, and preferences for heroin and crystal methamphetamine (all p < 0.05). Descriptive data yielded further insight into reasons for fentanyl preference, the predominant having to do with perceived effects of the drug and desire to avoid withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Only a relatively small subset of study participants preferred drugs containing fentanyl. Given the increased prevalence of fentanyl contamination across substances within the unregulated drug market, the result for PWUD is increasingly less agency with respect to choice of drug; for example, people may be forced to use fentanyl due to restricted supply and the need to mitigate withdrawal symptoms, or may be using fentanyl without intending to do so. Novel and more effective interventions for PWUD, including increased access to age-appropriate harm reduction programs such as fentanyl test strips and overdose prevention centers, are needed to mitigate fentanyl-related harms.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Fentanila , Humanos , Rhode Island/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides , Usuários de Drogas/psicologia , Usuários de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Preferência do Paciente , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In March 2020, British Columbia, Canada, introduced prescribed safer supply involving the distribution of pharmaceutical grade alternatives to the unregulated toxic drug supply. Prior research has demonstrated positive impacts on overdose mortality, but with limited reach to people who use substances. Objectives of this study were to (1) identify barriers to accessing safer supply prescribing among people who use substances; and (2) determine whether and how barriers differed between people with and without prescriptions, and between urban and rural settings. METHODS: We conducted a participatory mixed-methods study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants (≥ 19 years old) had received a safer supply prescription or were seeking one (survey n = 353; interviews n = 54). RESULTS: Participants who had a prescription were more likely to be living in a large urban centre, compared to medium/smaller centres and rural areas (78.5% vs. 65.8%, standardized mean difference = 0.286). Participants who did not have a prescription were more likely to report an array of structural, interpersonal, and health-related barriers (compared to those who had a prescription). In interviews, participants linked experiences of barriers to stigma and criminalization, low availability of services, lack of information and prescribers, not being able to get what they need, and anxieties, worries and doubts stemming from personal circumstances. There were no notable differences between large urban centres and medium/smaller centres and rural areas in the presence of specific types of barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate restricted access to safer supply prescribing outside of large urban centres and provide future targets for enhancing implementation. Attention is needed to promote equity and counter systemic barriers in the implementation of responses to the ongoing toxic drug emergency.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Colúmbia Britânica , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Rural , Adulto Jovem , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Overdose de DrogasAssuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Naloxona/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Participação da Comunidade , Colaboração Intersetorial , Ciência da Implementação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
Importance: With the implementation of Measure 110 (M110) in 2021, Oregon became the first US state to decriminalize small amounts of any drug for personal use. To date, no analysis of the association of this law with overdose mortality has fully accounted for the introduction of fentanyl-a substance that is known to drive fatal overdose-to Oregon's unregulated drug market. Objective: To evaluate whether the decriminalization of drug possession in Oregon was associated with changes in fatal drug overdose rates after accounting for the rapid spread of fentanyl in Oregon's unregulated drug market. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, the association between fatal overdose and enactment of M110 was analyzed using a matrix completion synthetic control method. The control group consisted of the 48 US states and Washington, DC, all of which did not decriminalize drugs. The rapid spread of fentanyl in unregulated drug markets was determined using the state-level percentage of all samples reported to the National Forensic Laboratory Information System that were identified as fentanyl or its analogues. Mortality data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2022. Data analysis was performed from fall 2023 through spring 2024. Exposures: Measure 110 took effect in Oregon on February 1, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome assessed was fatal drug overdose rates per half-year. A changepoint analysis also determined when each state experienced a rapid escalation of fentanyl in its unregulated drug market. Results: In this analysis, rapid spread of fentanyl in Oregon's unregulated drug supply occurred in the first half of 2021, contemporaneous with enactment of M110. A positive crude association was found between drug decriminalization and fatal overdose rate per 100â¯000 per half year (estimate [SE], 1.83 [0.47]; P < .001). After adjusting for the spread of fentanyl as a confounder, the effect size changed signs (estimate [SE], -0.51 [0.61]; P = .41) and there was no longer an association between decriminalization and overdose mortality in Oregon. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with this result. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of fatal drug overdose and the spread of fentanyl through Oregon's unregulated drug market, no association between M110 and fatal overdose rates was observed. Future evaluations of the health effects of drug policies should account for changes in the composition of unregulated drug markets.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Fentanila , Fentanila/intoxicação , Humanos , Oregon/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Masculino , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Feminino , Drogas Ilícitas/intoxicaçãoRESUMO
Importance: Since 2014, Medicaid expansion has been implemented in many states across the US, increasing health care access among vulnerable populations, including formerly incarcerated people who experience higher mortality rates than the general population. Objective: To examine population-level association of Medicaid expansion with postrelease mortality from all causes, unintentional drug overdoses, opioid overdoses, polydrug overdoses, suicides, and homicides among formerly incarcerated people in Rhode Island (RI), which expanded Medicaid, compared with North Carolina (NC), which did not expand Medicaid during the study period. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted using incarceration release data from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018, linked to death records from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, on individuals released from incarceration in RI and NC. Data analysis was performed from August 20, 2022, to February 15, 2024. Participants included those aged 18 years or older who were released from incarceration. Individuals who were temporarily held during ongoing judicial proceedings, died during incarceration, or not released from incarceration during the study period were excluded. Exposure: Full Medicaid expansion in RI effective January 1, 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality from all causes, unintentional drug overdoses, unintentional opioid and polydrug overdoses, suicides, and homicides. Results: Between 2009 and 2018, 17â¯824 individuals were released from RI prisons (mean [SD] age, 38.39 [10.85] years; 31 512 [89.1%] male) and 160â¯861 were released from NC prisons (mean [SD] age, 38.28 [10.84] years; 209 021 [87.5%] male). Compared with NC, people who were formerly incarcerated in RI experienced a sustained decrease of 72 per 100â¯000 person-years (95% CI, -108 to -36 per 100â¯000 person-years) in all-cause mortality per quarter after Medicaid expansion. Similar decreases were observed in RI in drug overdose deaths (-172 per 100 000 person-years per 6 months; 95% CI, -226 to -117 per 100â¯000 person-years), including opioid and polydrug overdoses, and homicide deaths (-23 per 100 000 person-years per year; 95% CI, -50 to 4 per 100â¯000 person-years) after Medicaid expansion. Suicide mortality did not change after Medicaid expansion. After Medicaid expansion in RI, non-Hispanic White individuals experienced 3 times greater sustained decreases in all-cause mortality than all racially minoritized individuals combined, while non-Hispanic Black individuals did not experience any substantial benefits. There was no modification by sex. Individuals aged 30 years or older experienced greater all-cause mortality reduction after Medicaid expansion than those younger than 30 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Medicaid expansion in RI was associated with a decrease in all-cause, overdose, and homicide mortality among formerly incarcerated people. However, these decreases were most observed among White individuals, while racially minoritized individuals received little to no benefits in the studied outcomes.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Medicaid , Prisioneiros , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Rhode Island/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade/tendências , Adulto Jovem , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Causas de Morte/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Scholarship on how fentanyl affects the complexities of correctional settings is limited in Canada, as scholars have focused on the prevalence of opioid use and overdose in prisons, as well as community treatment and access following release. Fentanyl constitutes a continuing challenge both in prisons and broader society. RESULTS: The current qualitative, interview-based empirical study examines how fentanyl is interpreted by correctional officers (COs, n = 99) across federal prisons in Canada, some of whom have worked in institutions with a high presence of fentanyl, while others have less exposure to the drug. We found that while many COs had responded to an overdose during their first or second year on the job, most COs who had did not perceive the event to be psychologically traumatic nor were concerned about the presence and availability fentanyl in their work environment, or they were indifferent. Yet this finding competes with the 41.4% of officers who did express concern about the presence of fentanyl - suggesting both a "normalization" of fentanyl as a workplace hazard as well as an underpinning social concern. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss the implications of these complicated findings in relation to reducing workplace stressors and countering misinformation that, in addition to other potential occupational factors, may be responsible for the concerns of COs tied to the presence of fentanyl.
Assuntos
Fentanila , Prisões , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Canadá , Feminino , Adulto , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevistas como Assunto , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Servidores PenitenciáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The increase in opioid-related overdoses has caused a decrease in average life expectancy, highlighting the need for effective interventions to reduce overdose risk and prevent subsequent overdoses. Peer support specialists (PSSs) offer an appealing strategy to engage overdose survivors and reduce overdose risk, but randomized controlled trials are needed to formalize peer-led interventions and evaluate their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study is a multisite, prospective, pilot randomized (1:1) controlled trial (CTN protocol 0107) that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED)-initiated, peer-delivered intervention tailored for opioid overdose survivors (Peer Intervention to Link Overdose survivors to Treatment [PILOT]), compared with treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 6-month, PSS-led PILOT intervention compared with TAU on the primary outcome of reducing overdose risk behavior 6 months after enrollment. Adults (aged ≥18 years; N=150) with a recent opioid-related overdose were identified and approached in the ED. Participants were screened and enrolled, either in the ED or within 7 days of ED discharge at research offices or in the community and then asked to complete study visits at months 1, 3, 6 (end of intervention), and 7 (follow-up). Participants were enrolled at 3 study sites in the United States: Greenville, South Carolina; Youngstown, Ohio; and Everett, Washington. Participants randomized to the PILOT intervention received a 6-month, PSS-led intervention tailored to each participant's goals to reduce their overdose risk behavior (eg, overdose harm reduction, housing, medical, and substance use treatment or recovery goals). Participants randomized to TAU received standard-of-care overdose materials, education, and services provided through the participating EDs. This paper describes the study protocol and procedures, explains the design and inclusion and exclusion decisions, and provides details of the peer-led PILOT intervention and supervision of PILOT PSSs. RESULTS: Study enrollment opened in December 2021 and was closed in July 2023. A total of 150 participants across 3 sites were enrolled in the study, meeting the proposed sample size for the trial. Primary and secondary analyses are underway and expected to be published in early 2025. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need to better understand the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED and for rigorous trials evaluating the effectiveness of PSS-led interventions on engaging overdose survivors and reducing overdose risk. Results from this pilot randomized controlled trial will provide a description of the characteristics of overdose survivors presenting to the ED; outline the implementation of PSS services research in ED settings, including PSS implementation of PSS supervision and activity tracking; and inform ED-initiated PSS-led overdose risk reduction interventions and future research to better understand the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05123027; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05123027. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60277.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Grupo Associado , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Overdose de Drogas/terapia , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A substantial number of hospital admissions end in patient-initiated departure before medical treatment is complete. Whether "before medically advised" (BMA) discharge increases the risk of subsequent drug overdose remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data from a 20% random sample of residents of British Columbia, Canada. We focused on nonelective, nonobstetric hospital stays occurring between 2015 and 2019. We used survival analysis to compare the rate of fatal or nonfatal illicit drug overdose in the first 30 days after BMA discharge versus the rate after physician-advised discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 6440 of 189 808 (3.4%) hospital stays ended in BMA discharge. Among 820 overdoses occurring in the first 30 days after any hospital discharge, 755 (92%) involved patients with a history of substance use disorder. Unadjusted overdose rates were 10-fold higher after BMA discharge than after physician-advised discharge, and BMA discharge was associated with subsequent overdose even after adjustment for potential confounders (crude incidence, 2.8% v. 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.89). Before medically advised discharge was associated with increases in subsequent emergency department visits (adjusted HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.83-2.02) and unplanned hospital readmissions (adjusted HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.96-2.19), but there was no significant association with the uncommon outcomes of fatal overdose and all-cause mortality. INTERPRETATION: Before medically advised departure is associated with an increased risk of drug overdose in the first 30 days after discharge. Improved treatment of substance use disorder, expanded access to overdose prevention services, and new means of postdeparture outreach should be explored to reduce this risk.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Alta do Paciente , Humanos , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Feminino , Masculino , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Amidst the ongoing drug poisoning crisis across North America, drug checking services (DCS) are increasingly being implemented as an intervention intended to reduce drug-related harms. This study sought to identify key opportunities and challenges influencing the implementation of DCS in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: Between January 2020 and July 2021, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 individuals involved in the implementation of DCS across BC (i.e., policymakers, health authority personnel, community organization representatives and service providers). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis of the interviews. RESULTS: By bringing in a wealth of knowledge about community needs and concerns, in addition to a passion and energy for social justice and health equity, community members and organizations with a dedication for harm reduction played a critical role in the successful implementation of DCS in BC. Other significant facilitators to implementation included the preventive benefits of DCS that made the intervention compelling to policy influencers and decision makers, the provincial public health emergency regarding overdose that shifted the regulatory environment of DCS, the adaptability of DCS to meet concerns and needs in various contexts, including via ongoing processes of reflection and evaluation. Barriers to implementation included criminalization and stigmatization of drug use and people who use drugs and lack of funding for community-led implementation actions. CONCLUSIONS: Alongside structural reforms that address the underlying contextual factors that influence implementation (e.g., decriminalization of drugs, increased funding for DCS), centering community expertise throughout implementation is critical to the success of DCS. Our findings provide important insights into how BC can successfully implement systems-level harm reduction interventions and offer insights for other jurisdictions in their implementation of DCS.
Assuntos
Redução do Dano , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Colúmbia Britânica , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Entrevistas como Assunto , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Naloxona , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes , Pediatras , Papel do Médico , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Naloxona/administração & dosagem , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Criança , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose is a global health crisis, affecting over 27 million individuals worldwide, with more than 100,000 drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2022-2023. This protocol outlines the development of the PneumoWave chest biosensor, a wearable device being designed to detect respiratory depression in real time through chest motion measurement, intending to enhance early intervention and thereby reduce fatalities. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to (1) differentiate opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) from nonfatal opioid use patterns to develop and refine an overdose detection algorithm and (2) examine participants' acceptability of the chest biosensor. METHODS: The study adopts an observational design over a 6-month period. The biosensor, a small device, will be worn by consenting participants during injecting events to capture chest motion data. Safe injecting facilities (SIF) in Melbourne, Victoria (site 1), and Sydney, New South Wales (site 2), which are legally sanctioned spaces where individuals can use preobtained illicit drugs under medical supervision. Each site is anticipated to recruit up to 100 participants who inject opioids and attend the SIF. Participants will wear the biosensor during supervised injecting events at both sites. The biosensor will attempt to capture data on an anticipated 40 adverse drug events. The biosensor's ability to detect OIRD will be compared to the staff-identified events that use standard protocols for managing overdoses. Measurements will include (1) chest wall movement measured by the biosensor, securely streamed to a cloud, and analyzed to refine an overdose detection algorithm and (2) acute events or potential overdose identified by site staff. Acceptability will be measured by a feedback questionnaire as many times as the participant is willing to throughout the study. RESULTS: As of April 2024, a total of 47 participants have been enrolled and data from 1145 injecting events have already been collected, including 10 overdose events. This consists of 17 females and 30 males with an average age of 45 years. Data analysis is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol establishes a foundation for advancing wearable technology in opioid overdose prevention within SIFs. The study will provide chest wall movement data and associated overdose data that will be used to train an algorithm that allows the biosensor to detect an overdose. The study will contribute crucial insights into OIRD, emphasizing the biosensor's potential step forward in real-time intervention strategies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57367.
Assuntos
Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Overdose de Drogas/diagnóstico , Overdose de Opiáceos/epidemiologia , Overdose de Opiáceos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Técnicas Biossensoriais/instrumentação , Técnicas Biossensoriais/métodos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the occupational pattern of opioid overdose deaths in Maryland between 2018 and 2022 and determine the occupations at higher risk of opioid overdose death. METHODS: The sample included undetermined or unintentional opioid overdose deaths among those aged 16 years or older in Maryland, drawn from the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. We calculated population-based incidence overdose rates by occupation, stratified by sex and race. We further calculated the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing each occupation with all other groups combined and estimated the IRRs among males versus females and non-Hispanic whites versus other racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: The pooled sample included 11 455 opioid overdose decedents (72% male and 55% non-Hispanic whites) of whom 80% were employed. The three occupation groups with the highest incidence rates were 'construction and extraction', 'transportation and material moving' and 'installation/maintenance and repair' with 291, 137 and 133 deaths per 100 000 workers in these respective occupational groups. Incidence rates were significantly higher in males than females in all categories except those 'Not in Labour Force' (IRR=0.51, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic whites relative to other racial/ethnic groups had a lower incidence of opioid overdose death in 'Military-Specific' occupations (IRR=0.53, p=0.031). CONCLUSION: Opioid overdose deaths vary by type of occupation and certain occupations are at higher risk of overdose death. The findings highlight the need for priority setting in the implementation and expansion of existing strategies to target the workers most impacted by opioid overdose.
Assuntos
Ocupações , Overdose de Opiáceos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Overdose de Opiáceos/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Maryland/epidemiologia , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Incidência , Analgésicos Opioides , Idoso , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidadeRESUMO
CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her 70s was found unresponsive and brought to our hospital with respiratory distress, cardiomyopathy and volatile alternation between hypotension and hypertension. She was intubated and admitted to intensive care for supportive treatment of suspected baclofen overdose. She gradually recovered and was discharged 10 days after presentation. Laboratory testing confirmed baclofen overdose. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the classic features of baclofen toxicity but also includes unusual features including ST elevations on ECG and apical ballooning on echocardiogram. Lack of immediate laboratory testing can be a significant diagnostic challenge, so a high index of suspicion is needed to definitively diagnose baclofen overdose. Furthermore, haemodynamic volatility requires careful and frequent re-evaluation of treatment, so early recognition and anticipation of complications are essential for effective management of this life-threatening condition.
Assuntos
Baclofeno , Overdose de Drogas , Humanos , Baclofeno/intoxicação , Feminino , Overdose de Drogas/complicações , Idoso , Relaxantes Musculares Centrais/intoxicação , Eletrocardiografia , EcocardiografiaRESUMO
Objectives. To examine drug overdoses in Colombia by type of substance, sex, age, and intent using data from a health surveillance system from 2010 to 2021. Methods. We characterized data by year, type of substance, and sociodemographic variables. We calculated age-adjusted overdose rates by substance type, sex, age groups, and intent. We used Poisson regression models to examine trend differences across sex and age groups. Results. Age-adjusted rates of drug overdoses increased from 8.51 to 40.52 per 100 000 during 2010 to 2021. Men, compared with women, had higher overdose rates for every substance, except for opioids and psychotropics. Drug overdose rates involving cannabis and stimulants increased steadily until 2017 but decreased afterward. Overdose rates involving psychotropic medication increased greatly during 2018 to 2021, mainly because of intentional overdoses in young women. Conclusions. Overdoses involving illegal drugs decreased in recent years in Colombia; however, the continuous increase in intentional psychotropic overdose rates highlights the need for prevention efforts to curb this trend. Health surveillance systems are an important tool that can guide overdose prevention efforts in countries with limited data resources. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(11):1252-1260. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307786).