True vaginal prolapse associated with retroflection of the urinary bladder in a bitch.

True vaginal prolapse is rare in bitches and is most likely to occur near whelping. A 2-year-old intact female Brazilian mastiff, 39.5 kg, had a true vaginal prolapse associated with urinary bladder retroflection; the female was in estrus, and concomitantly had diarrhea for 3 d, plus vaginal hyperplasia, and ultimately a vaginal prolapse. Ultrasound examination and retrograde urethrocystography were extremely important for detection and identification of the position (retroflection) of the urinary bladder within the prolapsed vagina. These tools, therefore, are recommended for a conclusive diagnosis and surgical planning, to avoid trans- and postoperative complications, e.g., urethral damage or bladder rupture. Prompt diagnosis and surgical correction enabled a favorable prognosis and rapid postoperative recovery, avoiding complications or ultimately death of the dog.

Prolapsus vaginal vrai associé à une rétroflexion de la vessie chez une chienne. Le prolapsus vaginal vrai est rare chez les chiennes et est plus susceptible de se produire près de la mise-bas. Une femelle dogue brésilien intacte de 2 ans, pesant 39,5 kg, a eu un prolapsus vaginal vrai associé à une rétroflexion de la vessie urinaire; la femelle était en oestrus et avait simultanément de la diarrhée pendant 3 jours, plus une hyperplasie vaginale et finalement un prolapsus vaginal. L'examen échographique et l'urétrocystographie rétrograde étaient extrêmement importants pour la détection et l'identification de la position (rétroflexion) de la vessie dans le vagin faisant prolapsus. Ces outils sont donc recommandés pour un diagnostic concluant et une planification chirurgicale, afin d'éviter les complications trans- et postopératoires, par exemple des lésions urétrales ou une rupture de la vessie. Un diagnostic rapide et une correction chirurgicale ont permis un pronostic favorable et une récupération postopératoire rapide, évitant les complications ou éventuellement le décès du chien.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Effect of Vitamin D analog supplementation on levator ani strength and plasma Vitamin D receptor expression in uterine prolapse patients.

Uterine prolapse is a pathological condition that can negatively impact women's quality of life. It is caused by weakening of the pelvic floor muscles. Function of levator ani muscle and other striated muscles is thought to be influenced by Vitamin D levels. Vitamin D exerts its biological effects by adhering to Vitamin D receptors (VDRs) present in striated muscles. We aim to analyze the effect of Vitamin D analog supplementation on levator ani muscle strength in uterine prolapse patients. This was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-post design on 24 postmenopausal women diagnosed with grade III and IV uterine prolapse. Vitamin D levels, VDR, levator ani muscle, and hand grip muscle strength were measured before and after three months of Vitamin D analog supplementation. We found that Vitamin D level, VDR serum level, levator ani muscle strength, and hand grip muscle strength all significantly increase (p < 0.001) following Vitamin D analog supplementation. The correlation coefficient between levator ani muscle and handgrip muscle strength was 0.616 and with p value of 0.001. To conclude, Vitamin D analog supplementation can significantly increase levator ani muscle strength in uterine prolapse patients. We propose that determining Vitamin D level in postmenopausal women and replenishing its deficiency with Vitamin D analog supplementation might aid in preventing POP progression.

Long-term outcomes of cable-suspended suture technique versus conventional suture for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior colporrhaphy (AC) is a conventional surgical repair technique for cystocele but with high recurrence rate. We present a novel technique: Cable-suspended structure (CSS) by non-absorbable suture combined with "bridge" formation in surgical treatment of cystocele. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term outcome of CSS technique for anterior vaginal wall repair with AC. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall repair between January 2012 and March 2017 at our center. All the patients were under a follow-up survey. The primary outcomes were objective cure (anterior prolapse POP-Q ≤ stage 1) and subjective cure (no symptoms of bulge or retreatment for prolapse). Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QOL) and patients' satisfaction, outcomes of site-specific POP-Q points Aa, Ba and C, as well as postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of 91 included participants, 43 underwent AC and 48 underwent CSS. The proportion of sarcrospinous ligament fixation in the CSS group was higher than in the AC group (81.4% vs. 77.1%, P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 69 months, the CSS group showed significantly higher objective cure rate compared with the AC group (72.9% vs. 51.2%, odds ratio 2.57, 95%CI 1.07-6.16). After adjusting for sarcrospinous ligament fixation, the CSS group still significantly showed higher objective cure rate (adjusted odds ratio 2.88, 95%CI 1.16-7.21). The proportion of the patients with POP-Q 0 stage in the CSS group was particularly higher than the AC group (25% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.025). There was no difference between the groups with respect to subjective cure, patients' satisfaction and postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: The CSS technique showed better objective outcome than AC, however, subjective cure rate did not significantly differ between the two. Future prospective trial with large-scale should confirm the effectiveness and safety of CSS in sexually active women.

Perioperative Outcomes of Colpocleisis at a Single Institution: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: There is limited literature reporting perioperative outcomes among colpocleisis types. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe perioperative outcomes after colpocleisis at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent colpocleisis at our academic medical center between August 2009 and January 2019 were included. A retrospective chart review was performed. Descriptive and comparative statistics were generated. RESULTS: A total of 367 of 409 eligible cases were included. Median follow-up was 44 weeks. There were no major complications or mortalities. Le Fort and posthysterectomy colpocleises were faster than transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) with colpocleisis (95 and 98 minutes, respectively, vs 123 minutes; P = 0.00) with decreased estimated blood loss (100 and 100 mL, respectively, vs 200 mL; P = 0.000). Urinary tract infection and postoperative incomplete bladder emptying occurred in 22.6% and 13.4% of all patients, respectively, with no difference among the colpocleisis groups (P = 0.83 and P = 0.90). Patients who underwent concomitant sling were not at increased risk of postoperative incomplete bladder emptying (14.7% for Le Fort and 17.2% for total colpocleisis). Prolapse recurred after 0 Le Fort (0%), 6 posthysterectomy (3.7%), and 0 TVH with colpocleisis procedures (0%) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colpocleisis is a safe procedure with a relatively low complication rate. Le Fort, posthysterectomy, and TVH with colpocleisis have similarly favorable safety profiles and very low overall recurrence rates. Concomitant TVH at the time of colpocleisis is associated with increased operative time and increased blood loss. Concomitant sling procedure at the time of colpocleisis does not increase the risk of short-term incomplete bladder emptying.

The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the recurrence rate, complication rate and subjective satisfaction with laparoscopic uterosacral suspension with or without hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 105 patients between June 2014 and December 2019. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse was defined as any prolapse to or beyond the hymen with straining or needing retreatment. Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi square test or Fisher's exact test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used for the data analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the durability of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension surgery is affected by uterine preservation. RESULTS: 60 patients underwent laparoscopic uterosacral suspension with concomitant hysterectomy (Hysterectomy group), and 45 underwent laparoscopic uterosacral hysteropexy (Hysteropexy group). The median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up for all 105 patients was 31 (22.5-47.5) months. The results of multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that no difference was found in the risk of overall recurrence between the hysterectomy and hysteropexy groups (25 % vs. 22 %; HR, 0.37; 95 % CI, 0.14-1.00). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the overall rates of recurrent prolapse between the two groups (P = 0.30). In addition, the subjective success rates were high in both groups (82 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated equally satisfactory objective and subjective long-term outcomes after laparoscopic uterosacral suspension with or without hysterectomy. Laparoscopic uterosacral hysteropexy can be safely and effectively offered to patients with pelvic organ prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and do not have contraindications.

Differences in Surgical Practice Patterns of Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Between Urologists and Gynecologists.

IMPORTANCE: Surgeon specialty training may influence the combination of transvaginal procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Isolated transvaginal anterior compartment repair (AR) without concurrent apical suspension (ApS) is a known risk factor for POP recurrence. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to compare the prevalence of isolated AR between urologists versus gynecologists. Our secondary aim was to compare associated postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for vaginal POP repair procedures (Current Procedural Terminology codes 57240, 57260, 57265, 57268, 57282, 57283) over a 5-year period by designated surgical specialty. We analyzed the relationships between specialty, vaginal repair type, operative details, and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, we included 16,093 women who underwent transvaginal POP repair, 90% performed by gynecologists and 10% by urologists. Urologists were more likely to perform an isolated AR without concurrent ApS (56% vs 47%, P < 0.0001). Gynecologists performed more isolated ApS (11% vs 9%) and combined AR with ApS (43% vs 35%, P < 0.0001). Overall, concurrent urethral sling placement was performed in 27% of cases, regardless of POP repair type, with no difference between specialties (P > 0.05). There were no differences in 30-day reoperations, readmissions, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, or hospital stay lengths between specialties (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Urologists perform a minority of vaginal POP repairs and were more likely to perform isolated AR than gynecologists. The absence of concurrent ApS may increase the likelihood of prolapse recurrence. Immediate complication rates for each procedure did not differ.

Recurrence of Anterior Vaginal Prolapse After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Does Cervical Preservation Affect Outcome?

IMPORTANCE: Anterior vaginal prolapse (AVP) is the most common site of recurrence after sacrocolpopexy (SCP). Supracervical hysterectomy helps to prevent mesh exposure, but it is unclear if cervical preservation (CP) affects adequate reduction of AVP. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to determine the difference in AVP recurrence rates in patients who have undergone SCP with or without CP. Secondary outcomes were composite failure and complications rates. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of women who underwent robotic SCP between 2012 and 2019 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. The first cohort included women with CP (prior or concomitant supracervical hysterectomy). The second included women without CP (prior or concomitant total hysterectomy). Primary outcome was defined as recurrent AVP beyond the hymen. Patients without 12-month follow-up were included in demographic and surgical data analysis only. RESULTS: The charts of 373 patients with CP and 175 without CP were reviewed. Women with CP were more likely to undergo concomitant anterior repair at the time of SCP (14% vs 6%, P < 0.01); however, rates of AVP recurrence were not significantly different between groups (5% vs 3%, P = 0.26). Median follow-up time was 26 months (interquartile range, 14-38 months). Composite failure was similar between groups (17% vs 11%, P = 0.12). Women with CP were more likely to experience asymptomatic apical failure (6% vs 1%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical preservation at the time of SCP is associated with an increased need for concomitant anterior repair but is not associated with higher rates of AVP recurrence or composite failure.

Stress Urinary Incontinence After Operations for Uterine Prolapse: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Concomitant surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pelvic organ prolapse (POP) operations are debated. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the risk of an SUI operation after a uterine prolapse operation and compare the risk after the Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a nationwide historical cohort study including women with no history of hysterectomy undergoing the Manchester procedure (n = 6065) or vaginal hysterectomy (n = 9,767) for POP during 1998 to 2018. We excluded women with previous surgery for SUI and POP, concomitant surgery for SUI (n = 34, 0.2%), and diagnosed with gynecological cancer before or within 90 days from surgery. Women were followed up until SUI operation/death/emigration/diagnosis of gynecological cancer/December 31, 2018, whichever came first. Women undergoing the Manchester procedure were censored if they had undergone hysterectomy.We assessed the rate of SUI surgery with cumulative incidence plots. We performed Cox Regression to analyze the risk of SUI surgery, adjusting for age, calendar year, income level, concomitant surgery in anterior and posterior compartments, and diagnosis of SUI before POP operation. RESULTS: We found that 12.4% women with and 1.6% without SUI diagnosed before the POP surgery who underwent SUI surgery within 10 years.During follow-up (median, 8.5 years), 129 (2.1%) underwent SUI surgery after the Manchester procedure and 175 (1.8%) after vaginal hysterectomy (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06 [0.84-1.35]). CONCLUSIONS: Of women diagnosed with SUI before POP operation 1 in 8 subsequently underwent SUI surgery. Few women not diagnosed with SUI subsequently underwent SUI surgery. There was no difference in risk of SUI after the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy.

Long-Term Pain After Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.

IMPORTANCE: There are limited long-term data on patient-reported pain after surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate pain in women undergoing minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh (Upsylon) >2 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a planned secondary analysis of a 5-site randomized trial comparing permanent versus absorbable suture for vaginal attachment of a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh during total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy in women with stage ≥2 uterovaginal prolapse. Our primary outcome was patient-reported pain or dyspareunia at >2 years. RESULTS: Of the 185 participants eligible for enrollment in the e-PACT study, 106 enrolled; 98 participants (96%) completed either in-person examinations or study questionnaires regarding pain and are included in this analysis. At >2 years, 28% reported any pain: 14% reported dyspareunia on questionnaires, 5% reported pelvic pain on questionnaires, and 14% of those who had an in-person examination reported pain. Of participants who reported pain or dyspareunia at baseline before surgery, 59% reported resolution of their symptoms >2 years. On multiple logistic regression controlling for age and baseline pain or dyspareunia, baseline pain or dyspareunia was associated with a nearly 3-fold increased risk of reporting any pain >2 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.9). No women had repeat surgical intervention for pain. CONCLUSIONS: Although 60% of women report pain resolution >2 years after surgery, de novo pain was present in 1 of 5 women. Baseline history of pain or dyspareunia is the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing pain >2 years after surgery.

Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how permanent compared with absorbable suture affects anatomic success in native tissue vaginal suspension (uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension) and sacrocolpopexy with mesh. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through March 29, 2022. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Our population included women undergoing apical prolapse surgery (uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy). Our intervention was permanent suture for apical prolapse surgery, and our comparator was absorbable suture. We determined a single anatomic success proportion per study. Adverse events collected included suture and mesh exposure, surgery for suture and mesh complication, dyspareunia, and granulation tissue. Abstracts were doubly screened, full-text articles were doubly screened, and accepted articles were doubly extracted. Quality of studies was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. In single-arm studies using either permanent or absorbable suture, random effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions were used to assess anatomic success. In comparative studies investigating both suture types, random effects meta-analyses of pooled risk ratios were used. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of 4,658 abstracts screened, 398 full-text articles were assessed and 63 studies were included (24 vaginal suspension [13 uterosacral ligament suspension and 11 sacrospinous ligament suspension] and 39 sacrocolpopexy). At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in permanent compared with absorbable suture in uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension (proportional anatomic success rate 88% [95% CI 0.81-0.93] vs 88% [95% CI 0.82-0.92]). Similarly, at 18-month follow-up, there was no difference in permanent compared with absorbable suture in sacrocolpopexy (proportional anatomic success rate 92% [95% CI 0.88-0.95] vs 96% [95% CI 0.92-0.99]). On meta-analysis, there was no difference in relative risk (RR) of success for permanent compared with absorbable suture for uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93-1.33) or sacrocolpopexy (RR 1.00, 95% CI0.98-1.03). CONCLUSION: Success rates were similarly high for absorbable and permanent suture after uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament suspension, and sacrocolpopexy, with medium-term follow-up. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021265848.

[Innovative prolapse surgery without mesh implants]. / Innovative Deszensuschirurgie ohne Gewebeersatz.

BACKGROUND: In many countries, such as France, England, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, alloplastic material in prolapse surgery has been paused due to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning, and restricted in other countries like the Netherlands and Sweden. For Europe and thus Germany, the SCENIHR report allows alloplastic material to be used for prolapse repair after recurrence and in other special situations. QUESTION: Which established and innovative prolapse surgeries without alloplastic material are currently available? METHODS: A literature search was carried out on established, guideline-compliant pelvic floor surgeries without alloplastic material as well as innovative new approaches. RESULTS: An established procedure for a defect in the anterior compartment is anterior colporrhaphy, which is associated with a high recurrence rate. The double-layered anterior colporrhaphy is a new approach and so far is associated with an improved 19-month outcome. Apical pelvic organ prolapse can be corrected by sacrouterine ligament fixation and vaginal sacrospinous fixation. New innovative techniques include laparoscopic unilateral pectineal suspension and the use of the semitendinosus tendon autograft to perform pectopexy or sacropexy. However, long-term data are still pending. In case of a posterior vaginal wall prolapse, posterior colporrhaphy is the therapy of choice and is associated with good success rates. CONCLUSION: Well-known surgical procedures with native tissue are experiencing a renaissance and new, innovative surgical approaches with good postoperative results are being developed. However, long-term studies are still necessary.

The effect of uterine volume on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving apical prolapse repair.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years uterine preservation has become a popular option in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of uterine volume on outcomes following uterine preserving surgical treatment for apical prolapse. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study at a tertiary university hospital. Included were women who had uterine preserving surgical treatment for apical prolapse. The cohort was divided into two groups: 1) Patients with a uterine volume ≥ 35 cm3 (large uterus group); 2) Patients with uterine volume < 35 cm3 (small uterus group). Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were compared between groups. Our primary outcome was composite outcome success including clinical and anatomical success and no need for reoperation. Secondary outcomes included clinical success, anatomical success, and patient satisfaction evaluated using the PGI-I questionnaire. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. The large uterus group (≥35 cm3) consisted of 37 patients as opposed to 47 in the small uterus group (<35 cm3). Clinical (91.9 % vs 87.1 %, p = 0.725) and anatomical success (84.8 % vs 90.9 %, p = 0.508) were high and did not differ between groups. Composite outcome success was 76.1 % in the small uterus group compared to 87.9 % in the large uterus group, but this difference was not statistically significant. Post-operative points Ba, C and Bp were similar between groups. No difference was found in patient satisfaction measured using the PGI-I questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing uterine preserving apical prolapse repair with uterine volume ≥ 35 cm3 have comparable surgical outcomes to patients with a smaller uterus.

Long term surgical outcomes of vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system vs. vaginal vault uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare long-term outcomes (7-10 years) between vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VHUSLS) and sacrospinous hysteropexy with the Uphold™ Lite mesh System (SHU) for management of apical prolapse. METHODS: Patients undergoing VHUSLS or SHU from 2008 to 2012 at a single tertiary referral center were included. Patients were contacted, asked to return for physical examination, and to complete the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Our primary outcome was anatomic failure defined as Stage 2 POP or higher of any compartment. The secondary outcome was subjective changes in symptoms based upon PFDI-20 responses. RESULTS: Two-hundred and two women were identified to have undergone the index surgeries from 2008 to 2012. Sixty-three agreed to return for follow up symptom evaluation and examination (30 VHUSLS and 33 SHU). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Clinical cure was high for both groups reaching 93.4 % and 94.0 % for the VHUSLS and SHU groups, respectively (p = 0.721). Anatomical success was lower with 44.7 % and 66.7 % of patients in the VHUSLS and SHU groups, respectively, meeting criteria for success (p = 0.138). There were no mesh complications among patients returning for exams. However, two patients who were contacted and were not interested in this study reported mesh complications and need for additional surgeries. Anterior vaginal wall support was noted to be significantly better supported for SHU (Ba -2.03 ± 0.75 vs -1.42 ± 0.92, p = 0.008). There were no differences between groups for overall PFDI-20 scores postoperatively. However, SHU patients reported higher rates of stress urinary incontinence compared to VHUSLS patients. CONCLUSION: In women with apical prolapse, VHUSLS and SHU afford similar long-term outcomes. SHU patients reported higher rates of stress urinary incontinence.

Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's preference for modified Manchester (MM) or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SH) as surgery for uterine prolapse. DESIGN: Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). SETTING: Eight Dutch hospitals. POPULATION: Women with uterine prolapse, eligible for primary surgery and preference for uterus preservation. METHODS: DCEs are attribute-based surveys. The two treatment options were labelled as MM and SH. Attributes in this survey were treatment success ( levels SH: 84%, 89%, 94%; levels MM: 89%, 93%, 96%), dyspareunia (levels: 0%, 5%, 10%), cervical stenosis (levels: 1%, 6%, 11%) and severe buttock pain (levels: 0%, 1%). A different combination of attribute levels was used in each choice set. Women completed nine choice sets, making a choice based on attribute levels. Data were analysed in multinomial logit models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's preference for MM or SH. RESULTS: 137 DCEs were completed (1233 choice sets). SH was chosen in 49% of the choice sets, MM in 51%. Of all women, 39 (28%) always chose the same surgery. After exclusion of this group, 882 choice sets were analysed, in which women preferred MM, likely associated with a labelling effect, i.e. description of the procedure, rather than the tested attributes. In that group, MM was chosen in 53% of the choice sets and SH in 47%. When choosing MM, next to the label, dyspareunia was relevant for decision-making. For SH, all attributes were relevant for decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The preference of women for MM or SH seems almost equally divided. The variety in preference supports the importance of individualised healthcare.

Cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy for urinary incontinence and apical prolapse: A systematic review.

Several anatomic theories suggest that lax uterosacral ligaments may result in apical prolapse and urinary incontinence. Therefore, prolapse repair such as cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy, may resolve urinary incontinence. Shortcomings in current treatment options endorse further exploration of the potential benefit of a surgical alternative. This systematically review of the literature aimed to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of cervicosacropexy and vaginosacropexy as alternative surgical treatment options for urge and/or mixed urinary incontinence and apical prolapse. The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed and the review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021267941). Studies from inception to 9/2021 were systematically reviewed and included. Data collection, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were assessed using the standard Cochrane methods. The primary outcome measures were improvements in prolapse and urinary symptoms. Secondary outcomes included surgical safety and reintervention rates for complications and recurrence. The included studies showed a moderate-to-high risk of bias and low certainty of evidence. Owing to their heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed. Cure rates for mixed and urge urinary incontinence and apical prolapse were 47.5 % (CI95%:42.4-52.6), 73.8 % (CI95%:61.9-85.7) and 97-100 % respectively, at a mean follow-up of 9.7 ± 7.3 months. Additional incontinence surgery in 38.9 % (216/555) of women with initial urinary incontinence, and concomitant or subsequent surgery for prolapse was performed in 4.4 % (13/299). Cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy may remedy symptoms of urge and mixed urinary incontinence and seem to correct apical prolapse in the short term. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is low. Therefore, further clinical trials, integrated in the IDEAL framework, targeting better-identified patient selection, and using validated outcome measures are needed.

Overnight removal of urinary indwelling catheter following vaginal prolapse surgery (OVERACT).

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition in women. Adequate timing of urinary catheter removal after vaginal prolapse surgery is essential to reduce post-operative morbidity. We compared midnight removal of the indwelling urinary catheter to removal next morning. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among 266 women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery, of whom 132 women had urinary catheter removal at midnight and 134 women morning after surgery. We compared the occurrence of urinary retention, time till first micturition, need for clean intermittent catherization and duration of hospital admission. Also, we assessed risk factors for the occurrence of retention. RESULTS: Retention occurred less after midnight removal of the urinary catheter, compared to removal next morning (6.1 % versus 23.9 %, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the time till catheter removal and discharge from hospital were shorter and the need for clean intermittent catheterization during hospital admission was lower after midnight compared to next morning removal of the urinary catheter. We identified anterior colporrhaphy as a risk factor for retention. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early removal of the indwelling urinary catheter after vaginal prolapse surgery seems save with respect to urinary retention and leads to earlier mobilization and shorter hospital admission.

Ultralight type I transvaginal mesh: an alternative for recurrent severe posterior vaginal prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the medium-term outcomes of ultralight type I mesh for postmenopausal women with recurrent severe posterior vaginal prolapse (PVP). METHODS: All participants underwent transvaginal ultralight type I mesh repair between April 2016 and April 2021 and were followed until May 2022. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) staging, mesh-related complications, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale and quality of life questionnaire responses were evaluated. The primary outcome was composite surgical success rate at the last follow-up, composite success being defined as no vaginal bulge symptoms, no POP-Q point at or beyond the hymen and no re-treatment for POP. Secondary outcomes included anatomic outcomes (POP-Q score), symptomatic relief and complications. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 37.3 months. At the last follow-up, the composite success rate was 75%, and POP-Q scores for the vault and posterior wall and quality of life questionnaire scores were significantly improved (p < 0.01). The subjective satisfaction (PGI-I ≤ 2) rate was 83.3%. There were no mesh-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Ultralight mesh can achieve good clinical outcomes and substantially improve the quality of life of patients with severe recurrent PVP in the medium term, and may thus be a viable alternative for treating this condition.

Prevalence and surgical outcomes of stage 3 and 4 pelvic organs prolapse in Jimma university medical center, south west Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects about half of the women and affects their quality of life. The current study is, therefore, aimed at determining the prevalence and surgical outcomes of severe stage POP at Jimma University medical center from November 2016 to May 2018. METHOD: A Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on all patients with stage 3 and 4 POP, who were admitted, and had surgery. Data were collected from the patient's chart, and logbooks, which were filled up from entry till her discharge. A Simplified POPQ(S-POPQ) was used to stage the prolapse at admission, at discharge, and three months follow-ups. RESULTS: Among 92 patients who were analyzed, POP accounts for 10.6% of all gynecologic admissions, and 43.8% of all gynecologic surgeries. The mean age of patients is 46 (± 12) years, and nearly 34% of the patients had stage 3 and 66% had stage 4 POP. Based on the type of prolapse, 93.5% of patients had stage 3 and more anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP) and apical prolapse, while 57.6% had stage 3 or more posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Out of 72 patients who had anterior colporrhaphy, 58.7% had anterior colporrhaphy with colposuspension. Out of 83 patients who had apical suspension, 48.2%, 39.8%, and 12% had uterosacral, sacrospinous, and Richardson respectively. Ninety-seven patients had stage 0 or 1 POP at discharge while 90% of 20 patients who returned for follow-up at three months had stage 0 or 1 POP. Eight patients had surgery-related complications; bladder injury, urinary retention, Hemorrhage during SSLF, and rectal injury. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is high and the majority of patients presented with advanced-stage pelvic organ prolapse, with a long duration of symptoms and associated problems. The surgical techniques used have resulted in a high immediate success rate of 97% and 90% at discharge and three months follow up respectively. Therefore, awareness creation activities are important to facilitate an early presentation for treatment to improve the quality of life and the current surgical technique; native tissue vaginal repair (NTVR), being practiced in the setup has had better success.

Uterine prolapse: impact of the condition and practical advice.

Pelvic-organ prolapse is where organs such as the uterus move out of place; in some cases, they can protrude out of the body. It occurs when muscles extending from the pubic bone to the coccyx or the levator ani muscles become weak or are injured. Although it is not life-threatening, the condition can be life limiting, adversely affecting physiological processes, function and quality of life, with patients reporting years of pain, discomfort, humiliation and embarrassment. Uterine prolapse is often under-reported as women may feel resigned to a condition that is viewed as part of getting old or the menopause, or a consequence of childbirth; they may also feel embarrassed. Gynaecology has the fastest growing waiting lists of any NHS specialty, and women may wait a long time for treatment. This article focuses on uterine prolapse, management of symptoms from conservative self-help to surgical options, and includes a case study of a successful laparoscopic hysteropexy with bifurcated polypropylene mesh apical support procedure carried out by a skilled surgeon.