RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT) has garnered attention as a potential diagnostic biomarker for infection in cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and to compare it with C-reactive protein (CRP) in adult non-neutropenic cancer patients with suspected infection. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify all relevant diagnostic accuracy studies. Original articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for infection detection in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic (HSROC) curve, and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 60% (95% CI [45-74%]) and 78% (95% CI [69-86%]). The diagnostic odds ratio was estimated at 5.47 (95% CI [2.86-10.46]). Three studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of PCT and CRP. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for PCT were 57% (95% CI [26-83%]) and 75% (95% CI [68-82%]), and those for CRP were 67% (95% CI [35-88%]) and 73% (95% CI [69-77%]). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT and CRP did not differ significantly (p = 0.61 and p = 0.63). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was similar to that of CRP as measured by the area under the HSROC curve (0.73, CI = 0.61-0.91 vs. 0.74, CI = 0.61-0.95, p = 0.93). CONCLUSION: While elevated PCT levels can be indicative of potential infection, they should not be solely relied upon to exclude infection. We recommend not using the PCT test in isolation; Instead, it should be carefully interpreted in the context of clinical findings.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Pró-Calcitonina , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Proteína C-Reativa , Razão de ChancesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe neutropenia who develop septic shock (SS) have high mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and mortality of SS in patients with HM and febrile neutropenia. METHODOLOGY: We included all patients with hematological malignancies (HM) who presented fever and severe neutropenia, admitted to an oncological tertiary care center in Mexico City for one year. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two episodes of fever and severe neutropenia were documented; 68 patients (23.2%) developed SS. Documented clinical infection was different between SS and non-SS patients (94.1% vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001); pneumonia was the most frequent infection (36.8% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.02). Also, in SS vs. non-SS, there were more positive cultures (69.1% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.001), higher frequency of Gram-negative bacteria (89.3% vs. 63.9%, p < 0.001), particularly Escherichia coli (68% vs. 44.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (23.4% vs. 15.1%). There were no differences when multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms were compared. In the multivariate analysis, associated risk factors for SS were: prolonged neutropenia, a documented site of infection, and having received highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Risk factors for mortality at 30 days were: older patients, prolonged neutropenia, and SS. CONCLUSIONS: Severe and prolonged neutropenia was associated with SS development and mortality at 30 days. ICU management should be offered to all critically ill patients with HM if long-term survival of the underlying malignancy is expected.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Escherichia coli , Neutropenia Febril/microbiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Sepsis is the main cause of nonrelapse mortality, and there are no published data on applicability of supportive care protocols from high-income countries such as Sri Lanka. The aim of the study was to investigate management and mortality of neutropenic episodes among Hemato-Oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, management, morbidity, and mortality of neutropenic Hemato-Oncology patients presented to the Lanka Hospital Blood Cancer Centre from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 was performed. RESULTS: A total of 169 neutropenic episodes were identified; 115 (68%) of such episodes were related to chemotherapy. Acute leukemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, and plasma cell disorders accounted for 23%, 69%, and 8% of patients, respectively. The median age of patients who had sepsis was 56 years, whereas that of those who had no sepsis was 53 years (P = .49). The median time to neutropenia was 9 days for those in the sepsis group compared with 8 days in the group that had no sepsis (0.64). The median neutrophil count in the group that had sepsis was 0.06, whereas it was 0.69 in the group that had no sepsis (P ≤ .05). The median time to commencement of antibiotics was 20 minutes. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the only documented study related to outcome and successful applicability of western supportive care protocols to Sri Lankan patients with neutropenia. In this study, we have shown that neutropenic sepsis can be successfully managed in the setting of limited resources with service development, following guidelines and staff training.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Neutropenia , Sepse , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sri Lanka/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Região de Recursos Limitados , Neoplasias/complicações , Sepse/terapia , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/diagnóstico , Neutropenia/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies residing in low-middle-income countries undergo significant physical and psychological stressors. Despite this, only 16% of them receive proper care during the terminal stages. It is therefore crucial to gain insight into the unique experiences of this population. AIM: To have a better understanding of the needs and experiences of adult patients with advanced hematological malignancy by exploring their perspectives. METHODS: A qualitative interpretive design was employed to collect and analyze data using a phenomenological approach. The study involved in-depth interviews with ten participants aged between 49 and 65 years, utilizing a semi-structured approach. RESULTS: Two primary themes emerged from the participants' experiences of reaching the terminal stage of illness: "Pain, Suffering, and Distress" and "Spiritual Coping." The first theme encompassed physical and emotional pain, suffering, and distress, while the second theme was centered on the participants' spiritual coping mechanisms. These coping mechanisms included seeking comfort in religious practices, relying on spiritual support from family and friends, and finding solace in their beliefs and faith. CONCLUSION: Patients with hematological malignancies in the terminal stages of their disease experience severe pain, considerable physical and psychosocial suffering, and spiritual distress. While they require support to cope with their daily struggles, their experiences often go unnoticed, leading to disappointment and loss of dignity. Patients mainly rely on their spirituality to cope with their situations. Healthcare providers must acknowledge these patients' needs and provide more holistic and effective care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Jordânia , Adaptação Psicológica , Neoplasias/psicologia , Espiritualidade , Dor/psicologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaçõesRESUMO
Cancer survivors are at significant risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality; patients with hematologic malignancies have a higher rate of death due to heart failure compared to all other cancer subtypes. The majority of conventional hematologic cancer treatments is associated with increased risk of acute and long-term CV toxicity. The incidence of cancer therapy induced CV toxicity depends on the combination of patient characteristics and on the type, dose, and duration of the therapy. Early diagnosis of CV toxicity, appropriate referral, more specific cardiac monitoring follow-up and timely interventions in target patients can decrease the risk of CV adverse events, the interruption of oncological therapy, and improve the patient's prognosis. Herein, we summarize the CV effects of conventional treatments used in hematologic malignancies with a focus on definitions and incidence of the most common CV toxicities, guideline recommended early detection approaches, and preventive strategies before and during cancer treatments.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Cardiotoxicidade/prevenção & controle , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy of galactomannan measurements is highly variable depending on the study population, diagnostic procedures, and treatment procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of posaconazole prophylaxis and empiric antifungal treatment upon diagnostic accuracy of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial lavage (BL), and serum in hematological malignancy population. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in a single tertiary care center with hematologic malignancies undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with a preliminary diagnosis of IPA were retrospectively included. RESULTS: In all the study population (n = 327), AUC for BAL, BL, and serum GM were as follows: 0.731 [0.666-0.790], 0.869 [0.816-0.912], and 0.610 [0.540-0.676] with BL samples having the best diagnostic value. GM measurements in patients under posaconazole prophylaxis (n = 114) showed similar diagnostic performance. While specificity was similar between patients with and without posaconazole prophylaxis, sensitivity of GM measurements was lower in patients with prophylaxis. Analyses with patient classified according to antifungal treatment at the time of FOB procedure (n = 166) showed a decreased diagnostic accuracy in serum GM and BAL GM measurements related with the duration of treatment. However, BAL, BL, and serum GM measurements presented similar sensitivity and specificity in higher cut-off values in longer durations of antifungal treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that posaconazole prophylaxis and active short-term (3 days) antifungal treatment do not significantly affect overall diagnostic performance of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial lavage samples. However, using different cut-off values for patients receiving active treatment might be suggested to increase sensitivity.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Hematologia , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/prevenção & controle , Mananas/análiseRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We present an updated overview of the hematological involvementassociated with sarcoidosis, including a management approach forcytopenias and revisiting the association with hematologicalmalignancies. AREAS COVERED: Theetiology of cytopenias in sarcoidosis can be attributed to two majoretiopathogenic mechanisms: infiltration of hematopoietic organs suchas the spleen and bone marrow, and autoimmune-mediated cytopenias.With respect to the association with hematological malignancies, itrequires careful evaluation of patients from a chronologicalperspective. Patients must be classified into one of three pathogenicscenarios, including preexisting hematological malignancies,synchronous development of malignancy and sarcoidosis due to commonpredisposing factors, or sarcoidosis as a predisposing factor formalignancies. EXPERT OPINION: The association between sarcoidosis and hematologic involvement isbest understood as a pathogenic continuum, with cytopenias andhematologic neoplasms intertwined due to various etiopathogenicmechanisms. These mechanisms include sarcoid infiltration ofhematopoietic organs, common predisposing immunogenetics for thedevelopment of autoimmune cytopenias and malignancies, and anincreased risk of neoplasm development in patients with autoimmunecytopenias. Collaboration among the main specialties involved in theclinical management of these patients is crucial for an earlymonitoring and management.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Linfoma , Neoplasias , Sarcoidose , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Trombocitopenia/complicaçõesRESUMO
ABSTRACT: We evaluated malignancy-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (mal-HLH) in Sweden regarding population-based incidence, clinical features, and survival. From 1997 to 2018, we identified 307 adults (≥18 years old) and 9 children (209 males, 107 females; P < .001) with both an HLH-related diagnosis and malignant disease, corresponding to 0.19 per 100 000 adults annually (0.15/100 000 for the entire population), increasing from 0.026 (1997-2007) to 0.34 (2008-2018) (P < .001). In the latest 7-year period (2012-2018), the annual incidence was 0.45 per 100 000 adults (n = 246). This incidence varied between the 6 health care regions in Sweden, from 0.18 to 0.71 (Region Stockholm) per 100 000 adults annually (P < .001), likely due to variable awareness. Mal-HLH was reported in 0.6% of all hematological malignancies, with the highest proportion (2.5%) in young males. Among the 316 patients, the 1-month probability of survival, likely representing the HLH episode, increased significantly from 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40-63) (1997-2007) to 71% (95% CI, 65-76) (2008-2018), whereas 2-year survival remained poor (25%; 95% CI, 20-30). Altogether, 52% were lymphomas, 29% leukemias, 8% other hematological malignancies, and 11% solid tumors. Males were more affected than females by mal-HLH, also taking the over-representation of males with hematological malignancies into account (P = .0012). Validation by medical-file reviews revealed 13% over-reporting of HLH. We conclude that the annual mal-HLH incidence has increased 10-fold and was at least 0.71 per 100 000 adults from 2012 to 2018, that is, 0.62 per 100 000 adults considering 13% estimated HLH over-reporting, and that early survival improved significantly, likely due to increased awareness and more HLH-directed therapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica , Neoplasias , Adulto , Masculino , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Linfo-Histiocitose Hemofagocítica/diagnóstico , Suécia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Assessment of individual VTE risk in cancer patients prior to chemotherapy is critical for determining necessity of interventions. Risk assessment models (RAM) are available but have not been validated for haematological malignancy. We aimed to assess the validity of the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (V-CATS) score in prediction of VTE in a variety of haematological malignancies. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted on 81 newly diagnosed cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Demographic, clinical and cancer related data were collected, patients were followed up for 6 months, and VTE events were recorded. Khorana score (KS) was calculated. Plasma D-dimer and sP-selectin were measured, and then, V-CATS score was calculated. Receiver operator curve (ROC) was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of RAMs. A modified V-CATS was generated and subsequently assessed by using new cut-off levels of d-dimer and sP-selectin based on ROC curve of the patients' results and compared the probability of VTE occurrence using all three RAMs. RESULTS: Among the 81 patients included in this study, a total of 2.7% were diagnosed with advanced metastatic cancer. The most frequent cancer was non-Hodgkin lymphoma (39.5%), and 8 patients (9.8%) developed VTE events. The calculated probability of VTE occurrence using KS, V-CATS and modified V-CATS scores at cut-off levels ≥ 3 was 87.5%, 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The AUC in ROC curve of modified Vienna CATS score showed significant difference when compared to that of V-CATS and KS (P = 0.047 and 0.029, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study highlight the value of three VTE risk assessment models in haematological malignancies. The modified V-CATS score demonstrated higher specificity compared to both V-CATS and KS, while all three scores exhibited similar sensitivity. We encourage the implementation of RAMs in haematological cancers for an appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Anticoagulantes , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias/patologia , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Selectinas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Although several scores stratify venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in solid tumors, hematologic malignancies (HM) are underrepresented. To develop an internal and external validation of a logistic regression model to predict VTE risk in hospitalized HM patients. Validation of the existing VTE predictive model was performed through a prospective case-control study in 496 hospitalized HM patients between December 2010 and 2020 at the Arnaldo Milián University Hospital, Cuba. The predictive model designed with data from 285 patients includes 5 predictive factors: hypercholesterolemia, tumoral activity, use of thrombogenic drugs, diabetes mellitus, and immobilization. The model was internally validated using bootstrap analysis. External validation was realized in a prospective cohort of 211 HM patients. The predictive model had a 76.4% negative predictive value (NPV) and an 81.7% positive predictive value (PPV) in the bootstrapping validation. The area under curve (AUC) in the bootstrapping set was 0.838. Accuracy was 80.1% and 82.9% in the internal and external validation, respectively. In the external validation, the model produced 89.7% of NPV, 67.7% of PPV, 74.6% of sensitivity, and 86.2% of specificity. The AUC in the external validation was 0.900. VTE predictive model is a reproducible and simple tool with good accuracy and discrimination.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Thalassemia management has undergone significant development with the advancement in iron chelation therapy, which has led to a prolonged life expectancy. This has been accompanied by the emergence of several new morbidities and chronic diseases, including cancer. Over the years, multiple cases of solid and hematologic malignancies in thalassemia patients have been reported in the literature, with no clear mechanism for the development of cancer in these patients despite a number of potential mechanisms. However, the results of many studies have been contradictory regarding the risk of development of malignancies in thalassemia. The present review aims to discuss the available data on cancer and thalassemia in the literature, with the latest updates regarding possible malignancy development mechanisms, risks, and the most commonly reported types.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sobrecarga de Ferro , Neoplasias , Talassemia , Humanos , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Talassemia/complicações , Talassemia/epidemiologia , Talassemia/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Sobrecarga de Ferro/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Arterial or venous thrombosis can complicate cancer, and 20% of cancer patients may develop venous thromboembolic disorders. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in some haematologic malignancies and may coexist with thrombocytopenia in those haematologic malignancies. We carried out this survey to assess the knowledge and practice of haematologists and resident doctors in haematology in Nigeria regarding the management of thrombocytopenia and cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: This was a survey that was shared electronically with participants who were consultant haematologists and resident doctors in haematology in Nigeria.. RESULTS: There were 106 respondents, 70 (66%) of which were consultant haematologists. About a third (30.2%) of the respondents saw 6-10 patients with blood malignancies monthly. Fifty-seven (53.8%) of the respondents carried out risk assessment in their patients for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT); 63 (59.4%) of the respondents saw 1-2 cancer patients with thrombosis in 3 months. The most common mode of treatment was pharmacological - 94 (88%) respondents used low molecular weight heparin. The most common haematologic malignancies associated with thrombocytopenia were acute leukaemias (69; 67%). The most common decision taken by respondents was to stop anticoagulants and transfuse platelets because the most frequent concern was the risk of bleeding in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: Many haematologists and haematology residents had a high level of awareness, knowledge and good practice regarding thrombocytopenia with CAT in haematooncology patients; however, there is a need for improved knowledge and unified protocols for treatment in line with newer management guidelines.
CONTEXTE: La thrombose artérielle ou veineuse peut compliquer le cancer, et 20 % des patients cancéreux peuvent présenter des troubles thromboemboliques veineux. La thromboembolie veineuse (TEV) est fréquente dans certaines hémopathies malignes et peut coexister avec une thrombocytopénie dans ces hémopathies malignes. Nous avons mené cette enquête pour évaluer les connaissances et la pratique des hématologues et des médecins résidents en hématologie au Nigeria concernant la gestion de la thrombocytopénie et de la thrombose associée au cancer. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une enquête qui a été partagée électroniquement avec les participants qui sont des hématologues consultants et des médecins résidents en hématologie au Nigéria. RÉSULTATS: 106 personnes ont répondu à l'enquête, dont 70 (66%) étaient des hématologues consultants. Environ un tiers (30,2 %) des personnes interrogées voyaient chaque mois 6 à 10 patients atteints de tumeurs hématologiques malignes. Cinquante-sept (53,8 %) des personnes interrogées ont procédé à une évaluation du risque de thrombose associée au cancer chez leurs patients ; 63 (59,4 %) des personnes interrogées ont vu 1 à 2 patients cancéreux atteints de thrombose en 3 mois. Le mode de traitement le plus courant était pharmacologique - 94 (88%) des personnes interrogées utilisaient de l'héparine de faible poids moléculaire. Les hémopathies malignes les plus fréquemment associées à la thrombocytopénie étaient les leucémies aiguës (69 ; 67%). La décision la plus fréquente prise par les personnes interrogées était d'arrêter les anticoagulants et de transfuser des plaquettes parce que la préoccupation la plus fréquente était le risque de saignement dans ce groupe de patients. CONCLUSION: De nombreux hématologues et résidents en hématologie avaient un niveau élevé de sensibilisation, de connaissances et de bonnes pratiques concernant la thrombocytopénie avec CAT chez les patients hémato-oncologiques; cependant, il est nécessaire d'améliorer les connaissances et d'unifier les protocoles de traitement conformément aux nouvelles directives de prise en charge. Mots clés: Thrombose associée au cancer, Hémato-oncologie, Thrombocytopénie, Hemorragie, Thrombose.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Hematologia , Neoplasias , Trombocitopenia , Trombose , Humanos , Nigéria , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Trombose/terapia , Trombose/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/induzido quimicamenteAssuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos , Neoplasias , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Hematopoiese Clonal , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/complicações , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/genética , Doença Aguda , Células Dendríticas , Neoplasias Cutâneas/complicações , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genéticaRESUMO
Patients with cancer demonstrate an increased vulnerability for infection and severe disease by SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. Risk factors for severe COVID-19 include comorbidities, uncontrolled disease, and current line of treatment. Although COVID-19 vaccines have afforded some level of protection against infection and severe disease among patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, decreased immunogenicity and real-world effectiveness have been observed among this population compared with healthy individuals. Characterizing and understanding the immune response to increasing doses or differing schedules of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with cancer is important to inform clinical and public health practices. In this article, we review SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, and those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant or chimeric-antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neoplasias , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Vacinação , ImunidadeRESUMO
Recent developments of assisted reproduction techniques turned possible to avoid the infertility consequences of oncologic treatments, but fertility preservation (FP) has been somewhat neglected in women with hematologic diseases undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. For these specific cases, the current options for FP include the cryopreservation of embryos, mature oocytes and ovarian tissue, and oocyte in-vitro maturation. We intend to make patients and clinicians aware of this important and relevant issue, and provide hematologists, assisted reproduction physicians and patients, with updated tools to guide decisions for FP. The physicians of the units responsible for female FP should always be available to decide on the best-individualized FP option in strict collaboration with hematologists. With a wide range of options for FP tailored to each case, a greater level of training and information is needed among clinicians, so that patients proposed to gonadotoxic treatments can be previously advised for FP techniques in hematological conditions. ABBREVIATED ABSTRACT: Recent developments of assisted reproduction techniques turned possible to preserve the fertility of women with hematologic diseases undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. Current options for fertility preservation in women with hematologic diseases are presented. It is imperative to offer fertility preservation to all women before starting any gonadotoxic treatment and in some cases after treatment. Fertility preservation methods enable to later achieve the desired pregnancy.
Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Doenças Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Criopreservação/métodos , Doenças Hematológicas/complicações , Doenças Hematológicas/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection delays therapy and in-person evaluation for oncology patients, but clinic clearance criteria are not clearly defined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of oncology patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary care center during the Delta and Omicron waves and compared clearance strategies. RESULTS: Median clearance by two consecutive negative tests was 32.0 days (Interquartile Range [IQR] 22.0-42.5, n = 153) and was prolonged in hematologic malignancy versus solid tumors (35.0 days for hematologic malignancy, 27.5 days for solid tumors, p = 0.01) and in patients receiving B-cell depletion versus other therapies. Median clearance by single negative test was reduced to 23.0 days (IQR 16.0-33.0), with recurrent positive rate 25.4% in hematologic malignancy versus 10.6% in solid tumors (p = 0.02). Clearance by a predefined waiting period required 41 days until an 80% negative rate. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 clearance remains prolonged in oncology patients. Single-negative test clearance can balance delays in care with risk of infection in patients with solid tumors.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Oncologia , Linfócitos BRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) receive palliative care (PC) less often and later than patients with solid tumors (ST). Patients' lack of knowledge about PC and negative feelings about PC are barriers to their willingness to use PC. Is there a difference between patients with HM and ST in their knowledge and willingness to use PC? METHODS: Two hundred ten patients (85 HM, 125 ST) from an oncology day clinic at a university hospital participated in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS: Patients with HM and ST had high knowledge and mainly positive feelings about PC. More than half of the patients answered that they would feel reassured by the use of PC, and one-third would feel anxious or hopeless. The majority of patients (58.3%) were willing to use PC. There are no significant differences between patients with HM and ST. In multiple regression analysis, perceived chance of cure and feelings of reassurance and anxiety are associated with willingness to use PC, but not with the HM/ST disease group. More than half (53.9%) of the participants would like the treating physician to choose the timing of a discussion about PC. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a high level of knowledge and relatively positive feelings of patients about PC, with no differences between patients with HM or ST. They expect their treating physician to initiate communication about PC. Communication should include the patient's feelings about PC and their chances of a cure.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Alemanha , EmoçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colonization of the oropharynx with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) is considered a negative prognostic factor in immunocompromised individuals. Hemato-oncologic patients represent a high-risk group due to their immunodeficiencies and associated treatments. This study aimed to determine the rates of oral colonization by GNB, associated factors, and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: We conducted a comparative study of hemato-oncologic patients and healthy subjects from August to October 2022. Swabs were taken from the oral cavity; specimens with GNB were identified and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: We included 206 participants (103 hemato-oncologic patients and 103 healthy subjects). Hemato-oncologic patients had higher rates of oral colonization by GNB (34% vs. 17%, P = 0.007) and GNB resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (11.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) compared to healthy subjects. Klebsiella spp. was the predominant genus in both groups. The factor associated with oral colonization by GNB was a Charlson index ≥ 3, while ≥ 3 dental visits per year were a protective factor. Regarding colonization by resistant GNB in oncology patients, antibiotic therapy and a Charlson index ≥ 5 were identified as associated factors, while better physical functionality (ECOG ≤ 2) was associated with less colonization. Hemato-oncologic patients colonized with GNB had more 30-day infectious complications (30.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.0001) than non-colonized patients. CONCLUSION: Oral colonization by GNB and resistant GNB are prevalent in cancer patients, especially those with higher scores on the severity scales. Infectious complications occurred more frequently in colonized patients. There is a knowledge gap about dental hygiene practices in hemato-oncologic patients colonized by GNB. Our results suggest that patients' hygienic-dietary habits, especially frequent dental visits, are a protective factor against colonization.
Assuntos
Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaçõesRESUMO
This study aimed to compare the clinical burden and healthcare utilization outcomes of hematologic versus solid malignancies in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This population-based, retrospective study extracted and analyzed the discharge data from the 2016-2018 US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) of hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of acute PE and a subsequent diagnosis of hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. Prolonged length-of-stay (LOS) was defined as ≥75th percentile LOS of the study cohort. Unfavorable discharge was defined as discharged to nursing home or long-term facility. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between cancer type, presence of unstable PE, and in-hospital outcomes in acute PE patients. Patients with acute PE with solid tumors had higher rates of in-hospital deaths and unfavorable discharge than those with hematologic malignancies (6.4% versus 3.2%, P < 0.001; 14.0% versus 11.2%, P = 0.01, respectively). Acute PE patients with hematologic malignancies had a lower risk of in-hospital death (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31-0.60), unfavorable discharge (aOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92), and prolonged LOS (aOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) than those with solid tumors. Stratified analysis showed that male patients aged <60 years with hematologic malignancies had a lower risk of prolonged LOS (aOR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.94; aOR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.68-1.05) and unfavorable discharge (aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.71; aOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.85) than those with solid tumors. In the comparison of the outcomes of acute PE with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, patients with hematologic malignancy had a lower risk of in-hospital deaths, prolonged LOS, and unfavorable discharge than those with solid tumors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Doença AgudaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Parenteral nutrition (PN) has been shown to be a safe method of feeding in the intensive care unit with modern infection prevention practices, but similar analysis in the hematology-oncology setting is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1,617 patients with hematologic malignancies admitted and discharged from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania during 3,629 encounters from 2017 to 2019 was undertaken to evaluate the association of PN administration with risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Proportions of mucosal barrier injury (MBI)-CLABSI and non-MBI-CLABSI were also compared between groups. RESULTS: Risk of CLABSI was associated with cancer type and duration of neutropenia but not with PN administration (odds ratio, 1.015; 95% CI, 0.986 to 1.045; P = .305) in a multivariable analysis. MBI-CLABSI comprised 73% of CLABSI in patients exposed to and 70% in patients not exposed to PN, and there was no significant difference between groups (χ2 = 0.06, P = .800). CONCLUSION: PN was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI in a sample of patients with hematologic malignancy with central venous catheters when adjusting for cancer type, duration of neutropenia, and catheter days. The high proportion of MBI-CLABSI highlights the effect of gut permeability within this population.