Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.052
Filter
1.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(3)2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been extensively studied for its impact on mortality, particularly in older age groups. However, the pandemic effects on stillbirths and mortality rates in neonates, infants, children and youth remain poorly understood. This study comprehensively analyses the pandemic influence on young mortality and stillbirths across 112 countries and territories in 2020 and 104 in 2021. METHODS: Using data from civil registers and vital statistics systems (CRVS) and the Health Management Information System (HMIS), we estimate expected mortality levels in a non-pandemic setting and relative mortality changes (p-scores) through generalized linear models. The analysis focuses on the distribution of country-specific mortality changes and the proportion of countries experiencing deficits, no changes and excess mortality in each age group. RESULTS: Results show that stillbirths and under-25 mortality were as expected in most countries during 2020 and 2021. However, among countries with changes, more experienced deficits than excess mortality, except for stillbirths, neonates and those aged 10-24 in 2021, where, despite the predominance of no changes, excess mortality prevailed. Notably, a fifth of examined countries saw increases in stillbirths and a quarter in young adult mortality (20-24) in 2021. Our findings are highly consistent between females and males and similar across income levels. CONCLUSION: Despite global disruptions to essential services, stillbirths and youth mortality were as expected in most observed countries, challenging initial hypotheses. However, the study suggests the possibility of delayed adverse effects that require more time to manifest at the population level. Understanding the lasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic requires ongoing, long-term monitoring of health and deaths among children and youth, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Stillbirth , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Child , Male , Pregnancy , Female , Young Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Aged , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Global Health , Mortality
2.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 91(4): e13844, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627916

ABSTRACT

Preeclampsia is one of the most common disorders that poses threat to both mothers and neonates and a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Viral infection during pregnancy is not typically considered to cause preeclampsia; however, syndromic nature of preeclampsia etiology and the immunomodulatory effects of viral infections suggest that microbes could trigger a subset of preeclampsia. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Herein, we review the potential role of viral infections in this great obstetrical syndrome. According to in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, viral infections can cause preeclampsia by introducing poor placentation, syncytiotrophoblast stress, and/or maternal systemic inflammation, which are all known to play a critical role in the development of preeclampsia. Moreover, clinical and experimental investigations have suggested a link between several viruses and the onset of preeclampsia via multiple pathways. However, the results of experimental and clinical research are not always consistent. Therefore, future studies should investigate the causal link between viral infections and preeclampsia to elucidate the mechanism behind this relationship and the etiology of preeclampsia itself.


Subject(s)
Pre-Eclampsia , Virus Diseases , Viruses , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/metabolism , Placentation , Trophoblasts/metabolism , Virus Diseases/complications , Virus Diseases/metabolism , Placenta/metabolism
3.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(7)2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38612523

ABSTRACT

To date, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still represents a great clinical challenge worldwide, and effective anti-COVID-19 drugs are limited. For this reason, nutritional supplements have been investigated as adjuvant therapeutic approaches in disease management. Among such supplements, vitamin D has gained great interest, due to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions both in adult and pediatric populations. Even if there is conflicting evidence about its prevention and/or mitigation effectiveness in SARS-CoV-2 infection, several studies demonstrated a strict correlation between hypovitaminosis D and disease severity in acute COVID-19 and MIS-C (multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children). This narrative review offers a resume of the state of the art about vitamin D's role in immunity and its clinical use in the context of the current pandemic, specially focusing on pediatric manifestations and MIS-C. It seems biologically reasonable that interventions aimed at normalizing circulating vitamin D levels could be beneficial. To help clinicians in establishing the correct prophylaxis and/or supportive therapy with vitamin D, well-designed and adequately statistically powered clinical trials involving both adult and pediatric populations are needed. Moreover, this review will also discuss the few other nutraceuticals evaluated in this context.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Adult , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements
4.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1352744, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605969

ABSTRACT

Like other infections, a SARS-CoV-2 infection can also trigger Post-Acute Infection Syndromes (PAIS), which often progress into myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). ME/CFS, characterized by post-exercise malaise (PEM), is a severe multisystemic disease for which specific diagnostic markers or therapeutic concepts have not been established. Despite numerous indications of post-infectious neurological, immunological, endocrinal, and metabolic deviations, the exact causes and pathophysiology remain unclear. To date, there is a paucity of data, that changes in the composition and function of the gastrointestinal microbiota have emerged as a potential influencing variable associated with immunological and inflammatory pathways, shifts in ME/CFS. It is postulated that this dysbiosis may lead to intestinal barrier dysfunction, translocation of microbial components with increased oxidative stress, and the development or progression of ME/CFS. In this review, we detailed discuss the findings regarding alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota and its microbial mediators in ME/CFS. When viewed critically, there is currently no evidence indicating causality between changes in the microbiota and the development of ME/CFS. Most studies describe associations within poorly defined patient populations, often combining various clinical presentations, such as irritable bowel syndrome and fatigue associated with ME/CFS. Nevertheless, drawing on analogies with other gastrointestinal diseases, there is potential to develop strategies aimed at modulating the gut microbiota and/or its metabolites as potential treatments for ME/CFS and other PAIS. These strategies should be further investigated in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Oxidative Stress , Dysbiosis/complications
5.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 457, 2024 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609910

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has strained healthcare systems and presented unique challenges for children requiring cancer care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to cancer care for children and adolescents in Northern Tanzania. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the demographic and clinical characteristics of 547 pediatric and adolescent cancer patients (ages 0-19 years old) between 2016 and 2022 using the population-based Kilimanjaro Cancer Registry (KCR). We categorized data into pre-COVID-19 (2016-2019) and COVID-19 (2020-2022) eras, and performed descriptive analyses of diagnostic, treatment, and demographic information. A secondary analysis was conducted on a subset of 167 patients with stage of diagnosis at presentation. RESULTS: Overall admissions nearly doubled during the pandemic (n = 190 versus 357). The variety of diagnoses attended at KCMC increased during the pandemic, with only five groups of diseases reported in 2016 to twelve groups of diseases in 2021. Most patients were diagnosed at a late stage (stage III or IV) across eras, with the proportion of under-five years old patients increasing late-diagnoses from 29.4% (before the pandemic), 52.8% (during the pandemic), when compared to the overall cohort. Around 95% of children in this age category reported late-stage diagnosis during the pandemic. Six out of the twelve cancer site groups also reported an increase in late-stage diagnosis. During the pandemic, the proportion of children receiving surgery increased from 15.8 to 30.8% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Childhood and adolescent cancer care changed in Northern Tanzania during the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased late-stage diagnoses presentations among younger patients and the increased use of surgical therapies in the context of a growing practice. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric and adolescent cancer care can help us better adapt healthcare systems and interventions to the emerging needs of children and adolescents with cancer in the midst of a health crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tanzania/epidemiology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1339394, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566791

ABSTRACT

Background: Firearm-related injuries (FRI) are an increasing cause of death and injury in children. The etiology for this rise is multifactorial and includes socioeconomic factors. Despite its prevalence and documented increase over COVID-19, there is a paucity of research on disparities and the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) in pediatric FRI. This study aims to explore the epidemiology of this vulnerable population in Atlanta, trends over time and relevant dates such as COVID-19 and a state firearm law, and disparities in clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with FRI (0-20 years-old, x̄=9.8, Median = 11) presenting to our hospital EDs from January 2014 to April 2023 (N = 701) and eligible for the Trauma Registry. This period includes two major events, namely the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020), and passage of state law Constitutional Carry Act (SB 319) (April 2022), allowing for permit-less concealed firearm carry. Single series interrupted time series (ITS) models were run and clinical outcome differences between race and insurance groups were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for confounders using inverse propensity treatment weights (IPTW). The primary outcome was mortality; secondary are admission and discharge. Results: Majority of FRI involved patients who were male (76.7%), Black (74.9%), publicly insured (82.6%), ≤12 years-old (61.8%), and injured by unintentional shootings (45.6%) or assault (43.7%). During COVID-19, there was a sustained increase in FRI rate by 0.42 patients per 1,000 trauma visits per month (95% CI 0.02-0.82, p = 0.042); post-SB 319 it was 2.3 patients per 1,000 trauma visits per month (95% CI 0.23-4.31, p = 0.029). Publicly insured patients had 58% lower odds of mortality than privately insured patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.99, p = 0.047). When controlled for race and mechanism of injury, among other confounding factors, this association was not significant (p = 0.652). Conclusion: Pediatric FRI are increasing over time, with disproportionate burdens on Black patients, at our hospitals. Disparities in mortality based on insurance necessitate further study. As social and economic repercussions of COVID-19 are still present, and state firearm law SB 319 is still in effect, assessment of ongoing trends is warranted to inform preventative strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology
7.
S Afr J Surg ; 62(1): 48-53, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall defects (AWDs), such as gastroschisis and omphalocele, and neural tube defects (NTDs) such as open spina bifida (SB) are common congenital anomalies. These anomalies are considered a leading cause of neonatal mortality and have been advocated as bellwether conditions to measure access to surgical care. METHODS: Newborns with open SB or AWD presenting to the nursery at Queen Nandi Regional Hospital over four years (2018-2021) were retrospectively identified. Clinical and electronic database records were reviewed to determine if transfers to definitive tertiary care occurred timeously. Reasons for delays and associated morbidity and/or mortality were investigated. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified and two were excluded due to unavailable or incomplete records. It took a median of 8 days (IQR 2-18 days) to reach tertiary care, with SB cases waiting significantly longer (median 16 days,IQR 8-25 days) (p = 0.000). Lack of tertiary service capacity was the main reason for delays. The COVID-19 pandemic did not affect time intervals (p = 0.676). Complications were common and overall mortality at our facility was high (n = 11/63, 17.46%). CONCLUSION: Newborns with open SB or AWDs experience marked delays in reaching definitive care. This is more pronounced for cases of SB and was not influenced by the pandemic. Lack of tertiary service capacity (including bed availability, limited staff, and theatre time) is the most important limiting factor.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Digestive System Abnormalities , Spina Bifida Cystica , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , South Africa/epidemiology , Hospitals
8.
BMJ Glob Health ; 9(4)2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580375

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in women before or during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection-related, pregnancy, offspring and reactogenicity outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Major databases between December 2019 and January 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Nine pairs of reviewers contributed to study selection. We included test-negative designs, comparative cohorts and randomised trials on effects of COVID-19 vaccines on infection-related and pregnancy outcomes. Non-comparative cohort studies reporting reactogenicity outcomes were also included. QUALITY ASSESSMENT, DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We undertook random-effects meta-analysis and reported findings as HRs, risk ratios (RRs), ORs or rates with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Sixty-seven studies (1 813 947 women) were included. Overall, in test-negative design studies, pregnant women fully vaccinated with any COVID-19 vaccine had 61% reduced odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.75; 4 studies, 23 927 women; I2=87.2%) and 94% reduced odds of hospital admission (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.71; 2 studies, 868 women; I2=92%). In adjusted cohort studies, the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was reduced by 12% (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.92; 2 studies; 115 085 women), while caesarean section was reduced by 9% (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98; 6 studies; 30 192 women). We observed an 8% reduction in the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 2 studies; 54 569 women) in babies born to vaccinated versus not vaccinated women. In general, vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Pain at the injection site was the most common side effect reported (77%, 95% CI 52% to 94%; 11 studies; 27 195 women). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and related complications in pregnant women. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020178076.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Parturition
9.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 36, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective surface cleaning in hospitals is crucial to prevent the transmission of pathogens. However, hospitals in low- and middle-income countries face cleaning challenges due to limited resources and inadequate training. METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of a modified TEACH CLEAN programme for trainers in reducing surface microbiological contamination in the newborn unit of a tertiary referral hospital in The Gambia. We utilised a quasi-experimental design and compared data against those from the labour ward. Direct observations of cleaning practices and key informant interviews were also conducted to clarify the programme's impact. RESULTS: Between July and September 2021 (pre-intervention) and October and December 2021 (post-intervention), weekly surface sampling was performed in the newborn unit and labour ward. The training package was delivered in October 2021, after which their surface microbiological contamination deteriorated in both clinical settings. While some cleaning standards improved, critical aspects such as using fresh cleaning cloths and the one-swipe method did not. Interviews with senior departmental and hospital management staff revealed ongoing challenges in the health system that hindered the ability to improve cleaning practices, including COVID-19, understaffing, disruptions to water supply and shortages of cleaning materials. CONCLUSIONS: Keeping a hospital clean is fundamental to good care, but training hospital cleaning staff in this low-income country neonatal unit failed to reduce surface contamination levels. Further qualitative investigation revealed multiple external factors that challenged any possible impact of the cleaning programme. Further work is needed to address barriers to hospital cleaning in low-income hospitals.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Infection Control , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Gambia , Tertiary Care Centers
10.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 953, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of hidden hearing loss (HHL) in calm state has not yet been determined, while the nutritional status is not involved in its pathogenic risk factors. In utero iron deficiency (ID) may delay auditory neural maturation in infants. We evaluated the association between ID and HHL as well as the modification effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on this association in newborns. STUDY DESIGN: We included 859 mother-newborns from the baseline of this observational northeast cohort. Data on exposure assessment included iron status [maternal hemoglobin (Hb) and neonatal heel prick serum ferritin (SF)] and SES (occupation, education and income). Auditory neural maturation was reflected by auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and electrocochleography (ECochG). RESULTS: Iron status and SES were independently and jointly associated with the prediction of neonatal HHL by logistic and linear regression model. The mediation effects were performed by Process. ID increased absolute latency wave V, interpeak latency (IPL) III-V, and summting potentials (SP) /action potentials (AP), which were combined as HHL. Low SES showed the highest risk of HHL and the highest levels of related parameters in ID newborns. Moreover, after Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) were positive, preschool children who experience ID in neonatal period were more likely to suffer from otitis media with effusion (OME). High SES also showed similar risk effects. CONCLUSION: Both low and high SES may strengthen the risk of ID on neonatal HHL in Northeast China.


Subject(s)
Iron Deficiencies , Mothers , Infant , Female , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant, Newborn , 60707 , Iron , Social Class
11.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 100(4): 268-274, abril 2024. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-232097

ABSTRACT

Durante el embarazo, los cambios fisiológicos en la respuesta inmunitaria favorecen que las gestantes sean más susceptibles a infecciones graves, tanto para ellas como para el feto, el recién nacido y el lactante. Todas las mujeres deberían entrar en el período reproductivo con su calendario vacunal correctamente cumplimentado, sobre todo en lo que respecta a enfermedades como tétanos, hepatitisB, sarampión, rubeola y varicela. Además de las vacunas recomendadas, en situaciones de riesgo las vacunas inactivadas podrían ser administradas en aquellas mujeres que no estuvieran correctamente inmunizadas con anterioridad, mientras que las atenuadas están contraindicadas.A pesar de que la vacunación durante el embarazo es una medida preventiva muy importante, y de las recomendaciones de autoridades sanitarias, sociedades científicas y profesionales sanitarios, las coberturas vacunales son claramente mejorables, especialmente en lo que respecta a gripe y COVID-19, por lo que todo profesional sanitario que atienda a la embarazada debe ser proactivo en aconsejarlas.La Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP), a través de su Comité Asesor de Vacunas (CAV), y la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO) recomiendan las siguientes vacunaciones durante la gestación: frente a gripe y COVID-19, en cualquier trimestre del embarazo, y durante el puerperio (hasta los 6meses) en aquellas que no hubieran sido vacunadas durante la gestación; frente a tosferina con Tdpa, entre las 27 y 36 semanas de gestación (el CAV-AEP da preferencia entre las 27 y 28 semanas); y frente al VRS con RSVPreF, entre las 24 y 36 semanas de gestación, de preferencia entre las 32 y 36 semanas. (AU)


During pregnancy, physiological changes in the immune response make pregnant women more susceptible to serious infection, increasing the risk for the mother as well as the foetus, newborn and infant. All women should be correctly and fully vaccinated as they enter their reproductive years, especially against diseases such as tetanus, hepatitisB, measles, rubella and varicella. In addition to the recommended vaccines, in risk situations, inactivated vaccines could be administered to women who were not correctly vaccinated before, while attenuated vaccines are contraindicated.Despite the fact that vaccination during pregnancy is a very important preventive measure and the existing recommendations from public health authorities, scientific societies and health professionals, the vaccination coverage could clearly be improved, especially against influenza and SARS-CoV-2, so any health professional involved in the care of pregnant women should proactively recommend these vaccines.The Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), through its Advisory Committee on Vaccines (CAV), and the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO) recommend vaccination against the following diseases during pregnancy: against influenza and COVID-19, in any trimester of pregnancy and during the postpartum period (up to 6months post birth) in women not vaccinated during pregnancy; against pertussis, with the Tdap vaccine, between weeks 27 and 36 of gestation (in the CAV-AEP recommendations, preferably between weeks 27 and 28); and against RSV, with RSVPreF, between weeks 24 and 36 of gestation, preferably between weeks 32 and 36. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pregnancy , Vaccination , Whooping Cough , Influenza, Human , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
12.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 20(4): 223-225, Abr. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-232376

ABSTRACT

Paraguay is currently facing a new outbreak of Chikungunya virus. This report summarizes two severe cases of Chikungunya (CHIKV) infection, confirmed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We present the cases of patients with acute CHIKV infection and multisystem involvement, with fever, rash, abdominal pain, vomiting, myocarditis, and coronary artery anomalies, very similar to the cases described in MIS-C related to SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Both patients received IVIG and methylprednisolone, with good clinical response. In this setting of cytokine storm in Chikungunya, can we call it “Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with Chikungunya”?.(AU)


Paraguay se enfrenta actualmente a un nuevo brote del virus Chikungunya. Este informe resume dos casos graves de infección por Chikungunya (CHIKV), confirmados mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción inversa en tiempo real. Presentamos los casos de pacientes con infección aguda por CHIKV y afectación multisistémica, con fiebre, erupción cutánea, dolor abdominal, vómitos, miocarditis y anomalías de las arterias coronarias, muy similares a los casos descritos en síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico relacionado con el SARS-CoV-2 durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Ambos pacientes recibieron IGIV y metilprednisolona, con buena respuesta clínica. En este escenario de tormenta de citoquinas en Chikungunya, ¿podemos llamarla «síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico asociado a Chikungunya»?.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Child , Cytokines , Chikungunya Fever , Chikungunya virus , /epidemiology , Paraguay , Inpatients , Physical Examination
13.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 294, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641830

ABSTRACT

AIM: Sleep disorders during pregnancy can impact maternal and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between sleep quality and maternal and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Educational-Therapeutic Center of Shohadaye Yaftabad Referral Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from December 2020 to September 2022. A total of 198 eligible participants were randomly assigned to either the sleep disorders group or the no sleep disorders group. Data were collected through demographic questionnaires, the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale (CDAS) questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the checklist for maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, the sleep disorders and no sleep disorders groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index (before pregnancy), education level, employment status, gravida, parity, abortion, and history of COVID-19. Within the sleep disorders group, there was a statistically significant, direct linear correlation between sleep disorders and FBS 34-36 weeks (r = 0.33, P < 0.001) as well as Corona Disease Anxiety (CDA) (r = 0.35, P < 0.001). The linear regression results indicated that for every unit increase in sleep disorders, the risk of FBS 34-36 weeks increased by 1.09 times (ß = 1.09, P < 0.001). Additionally, sleep disorders increased the risk of CDA by 1.36 times (ß = 1.36, P < 0.001). The results showed no statistically significant differences in terms of birth weight, type of delivery (vaginal or cesarean section), gestational age (preterm or full term), length of labor stages (first and second stage), Apgar score at minutes 1 and 5, and NICU admission between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, a certain degree of correlation exists between sleep quality and FBS at 34-36 weeks and CDA. These findings underscore the need for future public health guidelines to formulate detailed strategies to improve sleep quality during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sleep Wake Disorders , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Cesarean Section , Sleep Quality , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Iran/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
14.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0299163, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose was declared a public health emergency in the United States, but much of the focus has been on adults. Child and adolescent exposure and access to unused prescription-opioid medications is a big concern. More research is needed on the trend of pediatric (age 0-17) prescription-opioid overdose emergency department (ED) visits in the United States, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic year. METHODS: This retrospective epidemiological study used the 2008-2020 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample to provide a national estimate of ED visits related to prescription-opioid overdose. Inclusion criteria were 0-17-year-old patients treated at the ED due to prescription-opioid overdose. Eligible visits were identified if their medical records included any administrative billing codes for prescription-opioid overdose. National estimates were broken down by age groups, sex, geographic region, primary payer, median household income by zip code, ED disposition, and hospital location/teaching status. Incidence rate per 100,000 U.S. children was calculated for age groups, sex, and geographic region. RESULTS: Overall, the prescription-opioid overdose ED visits for patients from 0-17 years old in the United States decreased by 22% from 2008 to 2019, then increased by 12% in 2020. Most patients were discharged to home following their ED visit; however, there was a 42% increase in patients admitted from 2019 to 2020. The prescription-opioid overdose rate per 100,000 U.S. children was highest in the 0 to 1 and 12 to 17 age groups, with the 12 to 17 group increasing by 27% in 2020. ED visits in the West and Midwest saw prescription-opioid visits increase by 58% and 20%, respectively, from 2019-2020. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription-opioid overdose ED visits among U.S. children and adolescents decreased over the past decade until 2019. However, there was a substantial increase in ED visits from 2019 to 2020, suggesting the potential impact due to the then-emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Findings suggest focusing on young children and adolescents to reduce further prescription-opioid overdoses in the United States.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Overdose , Opiate Overdose , Prescription Drugs , Adult , Adolescent , Humans , United States , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Analgesics, Opioid , Opiate Overdose/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Prescriptions , COVID-19/epidemiology
15.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e075928, 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604636

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Conflicting evidence for the association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes exists. This study examined the associations between maternal COVID-19 during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA) and fetal death; as well as whether the associations differ by trimester of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study used a retrospective Mexican birth cohort from the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico, between January 2020 and November 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We used the social security administrative dataset from IMSS that had COVID-19 information and linked it with the IMSS routine hospitalisation dataset, to identify deliveries in the study period with a test for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES: PTB, LBW, SGA, LGA and fetal death. We used targeted maximum likelihood estimators, to quantify associations (risk ratio, RR) and CIs. We fit models for the overall COVID-19 sample, and separately for those with mild or severe disease, and by trimester of infection. Additionally, we investigated potential bias induced by missing non-tested pregnancies. RESULTS: The overall sample comprised 17 340 singleton pregnancies, of which 30% tested positive. We found that those with mild COVID-19 had an RR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) for PTB and those with severe COVID-19 had an RR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.19) for LGA. COVID-19 in the first trimester was associated with fetal death, RR=2.36 (95% CI 1.04, 5.36). Results also demonstrate that missing non-tested pregnancies might induce bias in the associations. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall sample, there was no evidence of an association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the findings suggest that severe COVID-19 may increase the risk of some perinatal outcomes, with the first trimester potentially being a high-risk period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Fetal Death , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
16.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(3): 355-361, 2024 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635615

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial injury due to COVID-19 infection is associated with higher mortality rates, higher intensive care unit admissions, and greater levels of inflammatory and cardiac markers. However, given the smaller number of papers regarding pediatric patients, there is still scarce data about mortality predictors in this population. This study aims to identify independent predictors of in-hospital death among pediatric patients hospitalized with myocardial injury related to COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: This is an observational, prospective, and longitudinal study of pediatric patients who were hospitalized between March 2020 and June 2021 in a tertiary pediatric hospital. A total of 1,103 consecutive pediatric patients tested positive for COVID-19, and 232 were admitted. All patients underwent cardiac evaluation with electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac markers. Of these patients, 88 were diagnosed with myocardial injury but 1 patient refused to participate, therefore 87 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 2 years (0-18), 38% had pre-existing comorbidities, and the mortality was 12% (n = 11). Cardiac evaluation has revealed high levels of troponin I in 63%, and electrocardiogram and echocardiogram abnormalities in 81% and 22% respectively. We found that high levels of inflammatory markers had higher mortality, but they didn't emerge as significant predictors of mortality when adjusted for other variables. Patients without pre-existing comorbidities were less likely to die in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may help healthcare providers better understand the cardiac implications of COVID-19 and define the necessity of cardiac surveillance amongst hospitalized pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Child , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Hospital Mortality , SARS-CoV-2 , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies
17.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 28(3): 20-29, 2024 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582973

ABSTRACT

The global response to COVID-19 undermined established public health goals. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health (RMNCH) services in Kiambu County, Kenya. It was a retrospective cross-sectional study, where data on antenatal care (ANC), delivery, postnatal care (PNC), and family planning (FP) before and after COVID-19 was retrieved and compared. New ANC clients and 4th ANC visits decreased by 2.9% and 17% respectively. New clients attending PNC increased by 13.3% (p = 0.007). Skilled deliveries reduced by 0.3%, maternal, neonatal deaths, and fresh stillbirths reduced by 0.7%, 23.9%, and 15.8% respectively. Caesarean sections rose by 12.7% (p=0.001). New clients and revisits for family planning reduced by 15.4% and 6.6% respectively. The pandemic adversely affected most of the RMNCH services. There is a need for health departments to institute robust strategies to recover the gains lost during COVID-19.


La réponse mondiale à la COVID-19 a sapé les objectifs de santé publique établis. Cette étude a examiné l'impact du COVID-19 sur les services de santé reproductive, maternelle, néonatale et infantile (SRMNI) dans le comté de Kiambu, au Kenya. Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale rétrospective, dans laquelle les données sur les soins prénatals (ANC), l'accouchement, les soins postnatals (PNC) et la planification familiale (PF) avant et après la COVID-19 ont été récupérées et comparées. Les nouvelles clientes de CPN et les 4èmes visites de CPN ont diminué respectivement de 2,9 % et 17 %. Les nouveaux clients fréquentant la PNC ont augmenté de 13,3 % (p = 0,007). Les accouchements qualifiés ont diminué de 0,3 %, les décès maternels et néonatals et les nouvelles mortinaissances ont diminué respectivement de 0,7 %, 23,9 % et 15,8 %. Les césariennes ont augmenté de 12,7 % (p=0,001). Les nouveaux clients et les nouvelles visites pour la planification familiale ont diminué respectivement de 15,4% et 6,6%. La pandémie a eu des conséquences néfastes sur la plupart des services de RMNCH. Il est nécessaire que les services de santé mettent en place des stratégies solides pour récupérer les gains perdus pendant la COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maternal Health Services , Infant, Newborn , Child , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Child Health , Kenya/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prenatal Care
18.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0299747, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Seychelles COVID-19 vaccination campaign was initiated using two different vaccines during the first wave of the pandemic in 2021. This observational study estimated vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes (hospitalisation and/or death) from individuals infected with COVID-19 in the Seychelles adult population during Beta and Delta variant transmission. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all Seychellois residents aged ≥ 18 years who tested positive by RT-PCR or rapid antigen test for COVID-19 between January 25, 2021, and June 30, 2021. We measured the relative risk (RR) of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation and/or death among individuals partially or fully vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (SII Covishield) or BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccines compared to unvaccinated individuals using modified Poisson regression. Controlling for age, gender and calendar month, vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 1-RR ≥14 days after the first dose and ≥7 days after the second dose for each available vaccine versus an unvaccinated control group. RESULTS: A total of 12,326 COVID-19 infections were reported in adult Seychellois residents between January 25, 2021, and June 30, 2021. Of these, 1,287 individuals received one dose of either BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) or ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 (SII Covishield) vaccine, and 5,225 individuals received two doses. Estimated adjusted effectiveness of two doses of either Sinopharm or SII Covishield was high, at 70% (95% CI 58%-78%) and 71% (95% CI 62%-78%) respectively. Sinopharm maintained high levels of protection against severe outcomes in partially vaccinated individuals at 61% (95% CI 36%-76%), while the effectiveness of one dose of SII Covishield was low at 29% (95% CI 1%-49%). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrated high levels of protection of two doses of two vaccine types against severe outcomes of COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic driven by Beta (B.1.351) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variant predominance. One dose of ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 (Covishield SII) was found to be inadequate in protecting the general adult population against hospitalisation and/or death from COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines, Inactivated , Adult , Humans , Infant, Newborn , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Retrospective Studies , Seychelles , Hospitalization
19.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 21(1): 29, 2024 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of longitudinal studies examining changes in device-measured physical activity and sedentary time from childhood to young adulthood. We aimed to assess changes in device-measured physical activity and sedentary time from childhood, through adolescence, into young adulthood in a Norwegian sample of ostensibly healthy men and women. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort of 731 Norwegian boys and girls (49% girls) participated at age 9 years (2005-2006) and 15 years (2011-2012), and 258 of these participated again at age 24 years (2019-2021; including the COVID-19 pandemic period). Physical activity and sedentary time were measured using ActiGraph accelerometers. Linear mixed models were used to analyse changes in physical activity and sedentary time and whether low levels of childhood physical activity track, i.e., persist into young adulthood (nchange=721; ntracking=640). RESULTS: The most prominent change occurred between the ages of 9 to 15 years, with an increase in sedentary time (150 min/day) and less time spent in light (125 min/day), moderate (16 min/day), and vigorous physical activity (8 min/day). Only smaller changes were observed between the ages of 15 and 24 years. Changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from childhood to young adulthood differed between subgroups of sex, tertiles of body mass index at baseline and tertiles of peak oxygen uptake at baseline. While the tracking models indicated low absolute stability of physical activity from childhood to young adulthood, children in the lowest quartiles of moderate-to-vigorous (OR:1.88; 95%CI: 1.23, 2.86) and total physical activity (OR: 1.87; 95%CI: 1.21, 2.87) at age 9 years were almost 90% more likely to be in these quartiles at age 24 years compared to those belonging to the upper three quartiles at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial reduction in physical activity and increase in time spent sedentary between age 9 and 15 years. Contrary to previous studies, using mainly self-reported physical activity, little change was observed between adolescence and young adulthood. The least active children were more likely to remain the least active adults and could be targeted for early intervention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adolescent , Adult , Male , Child , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Infant, Newborn , Follow-Up Studies , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/epidemiology , Exercise
20.
Viruses ; 16(3)2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543752

ABSTRACT

The human adenovirus (HAdV) is a common pathogen in children that can cause acute respiratory virus infection (ARVI). However, the molecular epidemiological and clinical information relating to HAdV among hospitalized children with ARVI is rarely reported in Russia. A 4-year longitudinal (2019-2022) study among hospitalized children (0-17 years old) with ARVI in Novosibirsk, Russia, was conducted to evaluate the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of HAdV. Statistically significant differences in the detection rates of epidemiological and virological data of all positive viral detections of HAdV were analyzed using a two-tailed Chi-square test. The incidence of HAdV and other respiratory viruses such as human influenza A and B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus, parainfluenza virus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, bocavirus, and SARS-CoV-2 was investigated among 3190 hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reaction. At least one of these respiratory viruses was detected in 74.4% of hospitalized cases, among which HAdV accounted for 4%. A total of 1.3% co-infections with HAdV were also registered. We obtained full-genome sequences of 12 HAdVs, which were isolated in cell cultures. Genetic analysis revealed the circulation of adenovirus of genotypes C1, C2, C5, C89, and 108 among hospitalized children in the period from 2019-2022.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus Infections, Human , Adenoviruses, Human , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Virus Diseases , Child , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Adenoviruses, Human/genetics , Child, Hospitalized , Hospitalization , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Russia/epidemiology , Genetic Variation , Adenovirus Infections, Human/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...