Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.999
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Optom ; 105(6): 561, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35912953
3.
Circulation ; 146(1): 1-3, 2022 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858167
4.
Hypertens Res ; 45(8): 1276-1297, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790879

RESUMEN

In 2021, 217 excellent manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research. Editorial teams greatly appreciate the authors' contribution to hypertension research progress. Here, our editorial members have summarized twelve topics from published work and discussed current topics in depth. We hope you enjoy our special feature, "Update on Hypertension Research in 2021".


Asunto(s)
Políticas Editoriales , Hipertensión , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
J Vis Commun Med ; 45(3): 133, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881082
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(14): e020913, 2022 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35861810
7.
J Pain ; 23(7): 1097-1098, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35803694
8.
Food Funct ; 13(15): 7959, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796245
13.
BMC Res Notes ; 15(1): 203, 2022 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35690782

RESUMEN

The rising rate of preprints and publications, combined with persistent inadequate reporting practices and problems with study design and execution, have strained the traditional peer review system. Automated screening tools could potentially enhance peer review by helping authors, journal editors, and reviewers to identify beneficial practices and common problems in preprints or submitted manuscripts. Tools can screen many papers quickly, and may be particularly helpful in assessing compliance with journal policies and with straightforward items in reporting guidelines. However, existing tools cannot understand or interpret the paper in the context of the scientific literature. Tools cannot yet determine whether the methods used are suitable to answer the research question, or whether the data support the authors' conclusions. Editors and peer reviewers are essential for assessing journal fit and the overall quality of a paper, including the experimental design, the soundness of the study's conclusions, potential impact and innovation. Automated screening tools cannot replace peer review, but may aid authors, reviewers, and editors in improving scientific papers. Strategies for responsible use of automated tools in peer review may include setting performance criteria for tools, transparently reporting tool performance and use, and training users to interpret reports.


Asunto(s)
Políticas Editoriales , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Proyectos de Investigación , Informe de Investigación
15.
Artif Life ; 28(1): 1-2, 2022 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35687108
16.
J Prim Health Care ; 14(2): 91-92, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35771701
18.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 28(1): 134-135, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35666558
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...