The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health care services in Kiambu County, Kenya.

The global response to COVID-19 undermined established public health goals. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health (RMNCH) services in Kiambu County, Kenya. It was a retrospective cross-sectional study, where data on antenatal care (ANC), delivery, postnatal care (PNC), and family planning (FP) before and after COVID-19 was retrieved and compared. New ANC clients and 4th ANC visits decreased by 2.9% and 17% respectively. New clients attending PNC increased by 13.3% (p = 0.007). Skilled deliveries reduced by 0.3%, maternal, neonatal deaths, and fresh stillbirths reduced by 0.7%, 23.9%, and 15.8% respectively. Caesarean sections rose by 12.7% (p=0.001). New clients and revisits for family planning reduced by 15.4% and 6.6% respectively. The pandemic adversely affected most of the RMNCH services. There is a need for health departments to institute robust strategies to recover the gains lost during COVID-19.

La réponse mondiale à la COVID-19 a sapé les objectifs de santé publique établis. Cette étude a examiné l'impact du COVID-19 sur les services de santé reproductive, maternelle, néonatale et infantile (SRMNI) dans le comté de Kiambu, au Kenya. Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale rétrospective, dans laquelle les données sur les soins prénatals (ANC), l'accouchement, les soins postnatals (PNC) et la planification familiale (PF) avant et après la COVID-19 ont été récupérées et comparées. Les nouvelles clientes de CPN et les 4èmes visites de CPN ont diminué respectivement de 2,9 % et 17 %. Les nouveaux clients fréquentant la PNC ont augmenté de 13,3 % (p = 0,007). Les accouchements qualifiés ont diminué de 0,3 %, les décès maternels et néonatals et les nouvelles mortinaissances ont diminué respectivement de 0,7 %, 23,9 % et 15,8 %. Les césariennes ont augmenté de 12,7 % (p=0,001). Les nouveaux clients et les nouvelles visites pour la planification familiale ont diminué respectivement de 15,4% et 6,6%. La pandémie a eu des conséquences néfastes sur la plupart des services de RMNCH. Il est nécessaire que les services de santé mettent en place des stratégies solides pour récupérer les gains perdus pendant la COVID-19.

Secondary Gains of Strategies to Prevent COVID-19 Infection in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Has the Frequency of Healthcare-Associated Infections Decreased?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and distribution of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We compared all cases hospitalized in the NICU and diagnosed with HAIs between 1 March - 1 September 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and 1 March - 1 September 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 957 babies, 427 babies in the pre-COVID-19 period and 530 babies during the COVID-19 pandemic. HAIs were determined in 47 patients (60 attacks) and 39 patients (44 attacks) in the pre-COVID-19 period and during the COVID-19 period, respectively. HAIs incidence density (per1000 hospitalization days) was found 5.43 in pre-COVID-19 period and 4.87 in COVID-19 period. During the COVID-19 period, there was a significant decrease in the HAI incidence density and bloodstream infection (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infection prevention strategies helped reduce the frequency of HAIs especially in bloodstream infection in NICU.

Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: With the identification of COVID-19 disease in China, a pandemic began that affected health-care systems. The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Hospital de Ginecobstetricia del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente experienced an increase in patient flow as part of the COVID-19 strategy of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal care and mortality indicators in our unit. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the number of hospital births, pre-term newborns (PTNB), NICU admissions, and deaths. Changes in frequencies between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed using Poisson distribution. Changes in PTNB births, proportion of admissions, and deaths/NICU discharges were analyzed by z-test for two proportions. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2021, the number of births increased by more than 2-fold. NICU admissions increased from 770 in 2019 to 1045 in 2021 (p < 0.01). The ratio of deaths/discharge from the service was 16.9% in 2019 and 13.1% in 2021 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality indicators in the NICU decreased from 2019 to 2021, even with the increase in the number of patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Con la identificación de la enfermedad por COVID-19 en China, inició una pandemia que afectó a los sistemas de salud. La Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales (UCIN) del Hospital de Ginecobstetricia del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) vio incrementado su flujo de pacientes como parte de la Estrategia COVID-19 del IMSS. El objetivo fue analizar el impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en los indicadores de atención y mortalidad neonatal en nuestra unidad. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo para comparar el número de nacimientos en el hospital, nacimientos de recién nacidos prematuros (RNPT), ingresos a UCIN y defunciones. Se analizaron los cambios en frecuencias entre los años 2019 a 2021 mediante la distribución de Poisson. Los cambios en nacimientos de RNPT, proporción de ingresos y defunciones/egreso en UCIN se analizaron mediante prueba Z para dos proporciones. RESULTADOS: Entre los años 2019 a 2021, el número de nacimientos incrementó más de 2 veces. Los ingresos a UCIN aumentaron de 770 en 2019, a 1045 en 2021 (p < 0.01). La proporción de defunciones/egreso del servicio fue de 16.9% en 2019, y 13.1% en 2021 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONES: Los indicadores de mortalidad en la UCIN disminuyeron de 2019 a 2021, aun con el incremento en el número de pacientes atendidos durante la pandemia COVID-19.

Acompañar una doble hospitalización en pandemia: la experiencia de padres con bebés hospitalizados mientras las madres se encuentran hospitalizadas por COVID-19 / Supporting a double hospitalization during the pandemic: The experience of fathers whose infants were hospitalized while their mothers were also hospitalized due to COVID-19

Introducción. La hospitalización de un hijo en la unidad de pacientes críticos neonatal puede ser altamente estresante para padres y madres, lo cual se intensificó en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19. A la fecha, no se han encontrado estudios que describan la experiencia de padres que vivieron la doble hospitalización simultánea de su pareja y de su hijo/a al nacer, durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Objetivos. Explorar la vivencia de los padres de tener a sus hijos/as hospitalizados en Neonatología mientras su pareja se encontraba hospitalizada por agravamiento de COVID-19. Población y método. Cuatro entrevistas semiestructuradas fueron realizadas y analizadas mediante un análisis interpretativo fenomenológico. Resultados. Se identificaron cuatro momentos cuando surgieron emociones específicas: a) inicio del contagio, b) hospitalización de la pareja, c) nacimiento del bebé y d) hospitalización del bebé. Culpa, miedo, angustia de muerte, soledad e incertidumbre aparecen muy tempranamente y luego se combinan con emociones como felicidad y empoderamiento, entre otras. La falta de contacto físico con sus parejas e hijos, y las fallas en la comunicación con los equipos de salud se destacan como factores que obstaculizan el ejercicio del rol paternal, mientras que una comunicación fluida con el equipo y una participación activa en los cuidados del bebé son factores protectores. Los padres cumplen una multiplicidad de roles, en la que prima el rol protector. Conclusiones. La comunicación y la atención centrada en la familia, y la participación activa en los cuidados de los bebés tienen el potencial de proteger contra el impacto de esta experiencia compleja de doble hospitalización.

Introduction. The hospitalization of a baby in the neonatal intensive care unit may be highly stressful for both mothers and fathers, and this was even more intense in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.To date, no studies have been found that describe the experience of fathers who underwent the simultaneous hospitalization of their partner and newborn infant during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives. To explore the experience of fathers who had their babies hospitalized in the Neonatal Unit while their partner were hospitalized due to worsening of COVID-19. Population and method. Four semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results. Four moments were identified when specific emotions arose: a) onset of infection, b) partner hospitalization, c) baby birth, and d) baby hospitalization. Guilt, fear, death anxiety, loneliness, and uncertainty appear very early and are later combined with emotions such as happiness and empowerment, among others. The lack of physical contact with their partners and babies and failures in communication with the health care team stand out as factors that hinder the exercise of the paternal role, while an effective communication with the health care team and active participation in the baby's care are protective factors. Fathers fulfill multiple roles, the most important of which is their role as protectors. Conclusions. Family-centered communication and care and active involvement in baby care may potentially protect against the impact of this complex experience of double hospitalization.

Cuidado e formação no campo da saúde em diálogo com os saberes populares / Health care and training in dialog with popular knowledge

Esta obra intitulada "Cuidado e formação no campo da saúde em diálogo com os saberes populares" é uma coletânea de produções, escrita a muitas mãos, no campo da educação popular em saúde, trazendo as reflexões de Paulo Freire para o campo da saúde em outros países, em especial, na América Latina, experiências vivenciadas no enfrentamento à pandemia da covid-19 e reflexões baseadas nos processos atuais de promoção, educação e cuidado em saúde nos territórios. Nos 10 anos da Política Nacional de Educação Popular em Saúde no Sistema Único de Saúde (PNEPS-SUS), esta obra expressa a força e a potência desta política que foi resistindo e se implantando, apesar das adversidades dos contextos históricos que o Brasil vivenciou. Como a força e a flexibilidade da água, os processos de educação popular em saúde foram contornando obstáculos, enfrentando barreiras, ocupando, ampliando espaços e se expandindo. Assim, as práticas e os conceitos da educação popular em saúde vão se constituindo no movimento das marés, das águas, do ar, da terra, das sementes e se espalhando nos diferentes territórios do Brasil e da América Latina.

Post-COVID in women after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy - a pilot study with follow-up data from the COVID-19-related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS).

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes; data on maternal long-term outcome is scarce. We analyzed long-term follow-ups on women who experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy to evaluate post-COVID symptoms, particularly fatigue, and their association with quality of life (QoL). METHODS: 773 women who enrolled in the CRONOS registry between April 2020 and August 2021 were contacted for follow-up from December 2022 to April 2023. Data was gathered through a web-based questionnaire. Subsequently, study coordinators matched the follow-up data with the existing CRONOS data. RESULTS: 110/773 (14%) women provided data. 20.9% experienced only acute symptoms during their SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, while 2.7% women experienced symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks (long COVID). Symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks (post-COVID) were reported by 63.6% women and occurred more often after severe COVID-19. Fatigue was the most frequently reported symptom (88%), with 55% of women still experiencing it more than one year after initial infection. 76% of women rated their QoL as "good" or "very good". Women experiencing post-COVID reported a significantly lower QoL. CONCLUSION: This is the first German long-term data on women after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, showing a high rate of post-COVID, a persistence of fatigue, and the impact on QoL. Continuous monitoring of pregnant women with COVID-19 is needed to develop comprehensive management strategies.

Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 - data from the German COVID-19 related obstetric and neonatal outcome study (CRONOS).

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in newborns born to mothers with peripartum SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German cohort, to identify potential risk factors associated with neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to present short-term outcomes of newborns with vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Data on women with SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring anytime during their pregnancy was gathered prospectively within the CRONOS registry. From April 2020 to February 2023 a total of 8,540 women had been registered. The timing and the probability of mother-to-child transmission in neonates born to women with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection were classified using the WHO classification system. The severity of maternal infection, maternal vaccination status, type of dominant virus, and perinatal outcome parameters were analyzed as potential risk factors for neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: 6.3 % resp. 42.9 % of tested newborns and stillbirths were SARS-CoV-2 positive. 2.1 % of newborns with confirmed and possible SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Severe maternal COVID-19 (odds ratio 4.4, 95 % confidence interval 1.8-11.1) and maternal infection with the Delta virus (OR 3.2, 1.4-7.7) were associated with neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Newborns with a confirmed or possible infection were significantly more often admitted to the NICU (65.2 % neonatal infection vs. 27.5 % non, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 positivity was higher in our cohort than previously reported, neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections were rare. Our data emphasizes confirmative testing should be performed in newborns of SARS-CoV-2 infected mothers to identify neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection as an underlying pathology leading to NICU admission.

Management of neonates with maternal prenatal coronavirus infection and influencing factors.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy causes adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Neonates are at risk of vertical transmission and in-utero infection. Additionally, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and impairment in the organ systems of the mother are associated with neonatal outcomes, including impaired intrauterine growth, prematurity, and neonatal ICU admission. The management of neonates born from infected mothers has changed over the progress of the pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, cesarean section, immediate separation of mother-infant dyads, isolation of neonates, and avoiding of skin-to-skin contact, breast milk, and breastfeeding were the main practices to reduce vertical and horizontal transmission risk in the era of insufficient knowledge. The effects of antenatal steroids and delayed cord clamping on COVID-19 were also not known. As the pandemic progressed, data showed that prenatal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates can be performed as pre-pandemic practices. Variants and vaccines that affect clinical course and outcomes have emerged during the pandemic. The severity of the disease and the timing of infection in pregnancy also influence maternal and neonatal outcomes. The knowledge and lessons from COVID-19 will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens. IMPACT: Prenatal infection with COVID-19 is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review includes the management of neonates with prenatal COVID-19 infection exposure, maternal-fetal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates, clinical features, treatment of neonates, and influencing factors such as variants, vaccination, severity of maternal disease, and timing of infection during pregnancy. There is a growing body of data and evidence about the COVID-19 pandemic. The knowledge and lessons from the pandemic will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens.

Factors influencing community-facility linkage for case management of possible serious bacterial infections among young infants in Kenya.

Despite evidence showing the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the World Health Organization's guidelines on managing possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) in Kenya, the initial implementation revealed sub-optimal community-facility referrals and follow-up of PSBI cases. This study explores facilitators and barriers of community-facility linkages in implementing PSBI guidelines in Busia and Migori counties, Kenya. We used an exploratory qualitative study design drawing on endline evaluation data from the 'COVID-19: Mitigating Neonatal Mortality' project collected between June and July 2022. Data include case narratives with caregivers of sick young infants (0-59 days old) (18), focus group discussions with community health volunteers (CHVs) (6), and in-depth interviews with facility-based providers (18). Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis framework. Between August 2021 and July 2022, CHVs assessed 10 187 newborns, with 1176 (12%) identified with PSBI danger signs and referred to the nearest facility, of which 820 (70%) accepted referral. Analysis revealed several factors facilitating community-facility linkage for PSBI treatment, including CHVs' relationship with community members and facilities, availability of a CHV desk and tools, use of mobile app, training and supportive supervision. However, challenges such as health system-related factors (inadequate providers, stockout of essential commodities and supplies, and lack of transport/ambulance) and individual-related factors (caregivers' refusal to take referrals) hindered community-facility linkage. Addressing common barriers and fostering positive relationships between community health workers and facilities can enhance acceptance and access to PSBI services at the community level. Combining community health workers' efforts with a mobile digital strategy can improve the efficiency of the identification, referral and tracking of PSBI cases in the community and facilitate linkage with primary healthcare facilities.

[Retrospective clinical-causal evaluation of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients across the age spectrum in a primary care hospital]. / Retrospektive klinisch-kausale Bewertung einer positiven PCR für SARS-CoV-2 bei hospitalisierten Patienten des gesamten Altersspektrums in einem Krankenhaus der Schwerpunktversorgung.

INTRODUCTION: It is often discussed that a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients may not be causally linked to the hospital stay, but no scientific data are available from Germany. Therefore, we analyzed to what extent a positive PCR test could be assessed as causal or secondary to admission according to clinical criteria in a tertiary care hospital of the first 4 months of 2022. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2-positive patients of RoMed-Klinikum Rosenheim/Bavaria from 01/01/2022 to 30/04/2022 were included. Patients were divided into a group with COVID-19 as direct reason for admission (CAW), and a group, in which this did not apply according to a comprehensive clinical assessment (nCAW). Patients with no clear allocation to these groups were counted separately. Categorization was based on a multilevel procedure and performed by an internist experienced in COVD-19 (M.H.). It included all available clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings as well as treatment decisions. RESULTS: 647 cases were included (age 10 days to 101 years, median 68 years; 49.5% women), including 13 patients in two admissions with positive PCR. 45.3% (n=293) were attributable to the group with COVID as the reason for admission, 48.8% (n=316) were not, no clear decision could be made in 35 patients, 3 patients were transferred from other clinics for isolation. In infants (up to 1 year), a positive PCR test was more frequently categorized as causative than in older patients. Leading symptoms of classification were found to be fatigue/fatigue, fever/chills, and cough on admission. Febrile convulsions accounted for the reason for admission in 10 cases of children (age 1.1-7.6 years). Length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (median (quartiles) 5 (2; 10) days for CAW, 5 (2; 12) for nCAW), nor did in-hospital mortality and median age of deceased or survivors. DISCUSSION: A retrospective analysis of all clinical data revealed that positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR played a major and - according to clinical criteria - causative role for admission and hospitalization in nearly 50% of cases, whereas it was an incidental finding in just under 50%. These results confirm data from other countries and demonstrate that the role of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test for hospitalization can only be answered by a comprehensive and elaborate analysis of individual data.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antenatal care provision and associated mental health, obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed many challenges on pregnant women, including rapid changes to antenatal care aimed at reducing the societal spread of the virus. This study aimed to assess how the pandemic affected perinatal mental health and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary unit in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women booked for care between March 2019 - June 2019 and March 2020 - June 2020. A total of 1984 women were included with no confirmed cases of COVID-19. The primary outcome of this study was adverse maternal mental health defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≥13 or an affirmative response to 'EPDS Question 10'. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth <37 weeks and <32 weeks, mode of birth, low birth weight, malpresentation in labour, hypertensive disease, anaemia, iron/vitamin B12 deficiency, stillbirth and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were no differences in the primary perinatal mental health outcomes. The rates of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (27 vs. 34 %, p<0.001) during the pandemic were higher; however, there was no difference in perinatal mortality (p=1.0), preterm birth (p=0.44) or mode of delivery (p=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no adverse consequences on maternal mental health during the pandemic, there was a concerning increase in neonatal morbidity potentially due to the altered model of maternity care implemented in the early COVID-19 pandemic.

Trends in COVID-19 diagnoses and outcomes in infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Characterize the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis among mothers with infants hospitalized in 294 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and demographics and outcomes of infants with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure in utero. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of infants discharged from NICUs 01/2020-09/2021. We defined groups based on infant diagnosis, infant testing, and maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 150,924 infants, 94% had no COVID-related diagnosis or test; 247 (0.2%) infants tested positive for COVID-19 and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation. Infants with unknown maternal status and negative testing were more commonly premature, outborn, and had longer hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of hospitalized infants, most had no known exposure to COVID-19. Adverse outcomes and mortality were rare. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of COVID-19 in this population.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early intervention utilization and need for referral after NICU discharge in VLBW infants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on early intervention (EI) services in VLBW infants. STUDY DESIGN: 208 VLBW infants seen in NICU follow-up (FU) pre-COVID-19 were compared to 132 infants seen during COVID-19 at 4, 8 and 20 months corrected age (CA) in terms of enrollment in Child and Family Connections (CFC; intake agency for EI), EI therapies, need for CFC referral and Bayley scores. RESULTS: Infants seen during COVID-19 at 4, 8 and 20 months CA were 3.4 (OR, 95% CI 1.64, 6.98), 4.0 (1.77, 8.95) and 4.8 (2.10, 11.08) times more likely to need CFC referral at FU based on severity of developmental delay. Infants followed during COVID-19 had significantly lower mean Bayley cognitive and language scores at 20 months CA. CONCLUSIONS: VLBW infants seen during COVID-19 had significantly higher odds of needing EI and significantly lower cognitive and language scores at 20 months CA.

Evaluating Standard of Care and Obstetrical Outcomes in a Reduced Contact Prenatal Care Model in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate the impact of reduced contact prenatal care necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic on meeting standards of care and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients in low-risk obstetrics clinic at a tertiary care county facility serving solely publicly insured patients comparing reduced in-person prenatal care (R) over 12 weeks with a control group (C) receiving traditional prenatal care who delivered prior. RESULTS: Total 90 patients in reduced contact (R) cohort were matched with controls (C). There were similar rates of standard prenatal care metrics between groups. Gestational age (GA) of anatomy ultrasound was later in R (p = 0.017). Triage visits and missed appointments were similar, though total number of visits (in-person and telehealth) was higher in R (p = 0.043). R group had higher GA at delivery (p = 0.001). Composite neonatal morbidity and length of stay were lower in R (p = 0.017, p = 0.048). Maternal and neonatal outcomes did not otherwise differ between groups. Using Kotelchuck Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index, R had higher rates of adequate prenatal care (45.6% R vs. 24.4% C, p = 0.005). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates the non-inferiority of a hybrid, reduced schedule prenatal schedule to traditional prenatal scheduling. In a reduced contact prenatal care model, more patients met criteria for adequate prenatal care, likely due to higher attendance of telehealth visits. These findings raise the question of revising the prenatal care model to mitigate disparities in disadvantaged populations.

Supporting a double hospitalization during the pandemic: The experience of fathers whose infants were hospitalized while their mothers were also hospitalized due to COVID-19. / Acompañar una doble hospitalización en pandemia: la experiencia de padres con bebés hospitalizados mientras las madres se encuentran hospitalizadas por COVID-19.

Introduction. The hospitalization of a baby in the neonatal intensive care unit may be highly stressful for both mothers and fathers, and this was even more intense in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, no studies have been found that describe the experience of fathers who underwent the simultaneous hospitalization of their partner and newborn infant during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives. To explore the experience of fathers who had their babies hospitalized in the Neonatal Unit while their partner were hospitalized due to worsening of COVID-19. Population and method. Four semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results. Four moments were identified when specific emotions arose: a) onset of infection, b) partner hospitalization, c) baby birth, and d) baby hospitalization. Guilt, fear, death anxiety, loneliness, and uncertainty appear very early and are later combined with emotions such as happiness and empowerment, among others. The lack of physical contact with their partners and babies and failures in communication with the health care team stand out as factors that hinder the exercise of the paternal role, while an effective communication with the health care team and active participation in the baby's care are protective factors. Fathers fulfill multiple roles, the most important of which is their role as protectors. Conclusions. Family-centered communication and care and active involvement in baby care may potentially protect against the impact of this complex experience of double hospitalization.

Introducción. La hospitalización de un hijo en la unidad de pacientes críticos neonatal puede ser altamente estresante para padres y madres, lo cual se intensificó en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19. A la fecha, no se han encontrado estudios que describan la experiencia de padres que vivieron la doble hospitalización simultánea de su pareja y de su hijo/a al nacer, durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Objetivos. Explorar la vivencia de los padres de tener a sus hijos/as hospitalizados en Neonatología mientras su pareja se encontraba hospitalizada por agravamiento de COVID-19. Población y método. Cuatro entrevistas semiestructuradas fueron realizadas y analizadas mediante un análisis interpretativo fenomenológico. Resultados. Se identificaron cuatro momentos cuando surgieron emociones específicas: a) inicio del contagio, b) hospitalización de la pareja, c) nacimiento del bebé y d) hospitalización del bebé. Culpa, miedo, angustia de muerte, soledad e incertidumbre aparecen muy tempranamente y luego se combinan con emociones como felicidad y empoderamiento, entre otras. La falta de contacto físico con sus parejas e hijos, y las fallas en la comunicación con los equipos de salud se destacan como factores que obstaculizan el ejercicio del rol paternal, mientras que una comunicación fluida con el equipo y una participación activa en los cuidados del bebé son factores protectores. Los padres cumplen una multiplicidad de roles, en la que prima el rol protector. Conclusiones. La comunicación y la atención centrada en la familia, y la participación activa en los cuidados de los bebés tienen el potencial de proteger contra el impacto de esta experiencia compleja de doble hospitalización.

Changes in Oral Health-Related Behaviors and Oral Health of Children in Early Childhood during Social Isolation Caused by COVID-19

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess changes in oral health-related behavior and oral health status in Brazilian children in early childhood perceived by their parents/caregivers during social isolation caused by COVID-19. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study with parents/caregivers of children in southeastern Brazil aged 0-5 years who responded to an online questionnaire about sociodemographic data, dietary changes, oral hygiene, and oral health status of children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Of the 119 parents/caregivers, 54.60% did not observe any changes in eating habits, and 81.50% maintained their children's oral hygiene. Associations were observed between the impact of the pandemic on the family income and changes in eating habits (p=0.02) and between lower family income and dental caries perceived by parents/caregivers (p=0.05). Z tests with Bonferroni correction showed that families with drastic income reduction were more likely to consume lower-cost foods (62.50%) than families with no impact or slight reduction on family income. Parents/caregivers did not identify dental caries (89.10%), toothache (92.40%), and dental trauma (92.40%) in their children. Conclusion: Parents/caregivers of children in southeastern Brazil aged 0-5 years observed behavioral changes in the dietary habits of families whose income was impacted by the pandemic, and their perception of dental caries was significantly associated with family income.

Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Periods of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Health Outcomes During Delivery Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis at delivery and adverse maternal health and pregnancy outcomes during pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron variant predominance, with a focus on the time period of Omicron variant predominance. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with data from delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Healthcare Database from February 2020 to August 2023. The pre-Delta (February 2020-June 2021), Delta (July 2021-December 2021), and Omicron (January 2022-August 2023) periods of variant predominance were examined. Exposure to COVID-19 was identified by having a diagnostic code for COVID-19 during the delivery hospitalization. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were calculated to compare the risks of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes for women with and without COVID-19 diagnoses at the time of delivery for each variant period. RESULTS: Among 2,990,973 women with delivery hospitalizations, 1.9% (n=56,618) had COVID-19 diagnoses noted at delivery admission discharge, including 26,053 during the Omicron period. Across all variant time periods, the prevalence of many adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes during the delivery hospitalization was significantly higher for pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with pregnant women without COVID-19. In adjusted models, COVID-19 during the Omicron period was associated with significant increased risks for maternal sepsis (COVID-19: 0.4% vs no COVID-19: 0.1%; aPR 3.32, 95% CI, 2.70-4.08), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.6% vs 0.1%; aPR 6.19, 95% CI, 5.26-7.29), shock (0.2% vs 0.1%; aPR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.62-2.84), renal failure (0.5% vs 0.2%; aPR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.73-2.49), intensive care unit admission (2.7% vs 1.7%; aPR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.52-1.77), mechanical ventilation (0.3% vs 0.1%; aPR 3.15, 95% CI, 2.52-3.93), in-hospital death (0.03% vs 0.01%; aPR 5.00, 95% CI, 2.30-10.90), stillbirth (0.7% vs 0.6%; aPR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.01-1.36), and preterm delivery (12.3% vs 9.6%; aPR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.24-1.33). CONCLUSION: Despite the possibility of some level of immunity due to previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, vaccination, or testing differences, risks of adverse outcomes associated with COVID-19 diagnosis at delivery remained elevated during the Omicron variant time period.

No change in mother's own milk provision and breastfeeding rates in preterm infants during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the duration of mother's own milk (MOM) provision to preterm very low-birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) infants during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesised that COVID-19 restrictions would reduce the duration of MOM provision. METHODS: This retrospective study compared VLBW infants born at the Berlin university hospital during the pandemic (15 March 2020 to 14 March 2021, n = 108) with infants born in the pre-pandemic year (01 January 2019 to 31 January 2019, n = 121). We calculated the duration of MOM provision and analysed factors associated with its early cessation. RESULTS: During the pandemic, the rate of primiparous mothers increased from 29% to 44% while the distribution of all other parental and infants' characteristics remained similar. There were no differences in the median duration of MOM provision (47 vs. 51 days), feeding type (MOM 67% vs. 65%) and breastfeeding rates at discharge (exclusive, 8% vs. 13%; partial 69% vs. 60%). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed smoking during pregnancy and parental school education consistently as independent risk factors for early cessation of MOM provision. CONCLUSION: Supply of MOM for VLBW infants can be upheld also during pandemic restrictions.

Evolução Clínica e Fatores Prognósticos de Pacientes Oncológicos com Covid-19 em Ventilação Mecânica / Clinical Evolution and Prognostic Factors of Cancer Patients with COVID-19 in Mechanical Ventilation

Introdução: Pacientes com câncer apresentaram risco de desenvolver quadros respiratórios graves quando acometidos por covid-19, com necessidade de suporte intensivo e de ventilação mecânica invasiva (VMI). Objetivo: Avaliar os fatores associados ao óbito em pacientes oncológicos que tiveram covid-19 e evoluíram com insuficiência respiratória e necessidade de VMI. Método: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo de pacientes com câncer em uma unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) oncológica, com covid-19 e em VMI de abril de 2020 a dezembro de 2021. Foram incluídos de forma sequencial todos os pacientes com câncer admitidos na UTI em VMI ou que evoluíram com VMI por agravamento da covid-19, sendo excluídos aqueles em controle da doença oncológica há mais de cinco anos. Para a análise estatística, foram utilizadas medidas de tendência central e dispersão, assim como frequências absolutas e relativas. A regressão logística múltipla foi aplicada para a avaliação dos fatores associados à mortalidade, considerando estatisticamente significantes valores de p < 0,05. Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo 85 pacientes. O óbito foi maior entre os pacientes com tumores sólidos (OR = 3,64; IC 95%: 1,06-12,52; p = 0,04), entre os que necessitaram de suporte renal durante a internação na UTI (OR = 6,88; IC 95%: 1,82-25,98; p = 0,004), os que não puderam ser extubados (OR = 8,00; IC 95%: 2,16-29,67; p = 0,002) e os que apresentaram o valor de pressão de distensão alveolar maior do que 15cmH2O por pelo menos um dia (OR = 5,9; IC 95%: 1,76-19,80; p = 0,004). Conclusão: Características clínicas e de VMI estavam associadas à morte de pacientes oncológicos com covid-19 e em VMI.

Los pacientes con cáncer corrían riesgo de desarrollar afecciones respiratorias graves al ser afectados por la COVID-19, requiriendo soporte intensivo y ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI). Objetivo: Evaluar los factores asociados a la muerte en pacientes con cáncer que tuvieron COVID-19 y que desarrollaron insuficiencia respiratoria y necesidad de VMI. Método: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en pacientes oncológicos internados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) de oncología, con COVID-19 y en VMI de abril de 2020 a diciembre de 2021. Se incluyeron secuencialmente todos los pacientes con cáncer ingresados en UCI con VMI o que necesitaron VMI por empeoramiento de la COVID-19, excluyendo a aquellos que llevaban más de cinco años bajo control de la enfermedad oncológica. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron medidas de tendencia central y dispersión, así como frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Se aplicó regresión logística múltiple para evaluar los factores asociados a la mortalidad, considerando valores de p<0,05 estadísticamente significativos. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 85 pacientes. La muerte fue mayor entre los pacientes con tumores sólidos (OR= 3,64; IC 95%, 1,06-12,52; p=0,04), entre los que requirieron soporte renal durante la estancia en UCI (OR = 6,88; IC 95%, 1,82-25,98; p= 0,004), entre los que no pudieron ser extubados (OR= 8,00; IC 95%, 2,16-29,67; p= 0,002) y entre los que presentaron un valor de presión de distensión alveolar mayor a 15cmH2O durante al menos un día (OR = 5,9; IC 95%, 1,76-19,80; p=0,004). Conclusión: Las características clínicas y de VMI se asociaron con la muerte en pacientes oncológicos con COVID-19 y en VMI.

Cancer patients were at risk of developing severe respiratory conditions when affected by COVID-19, requiring intensive support and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Objective: Evaluate the factors associated with death of cancer patients by COVID-19 who developed respiratory failure and need of IMV. Method: Retrospective cohort study of cancer patients in an oncology intensive care unit (ICU), with COVID-19 and on IMV was carried out from April 2020 to December 2021. All patients with cancer admitted to the ICU on IMV or who developed IMV due to worsening of COVID-19 were sequentially included, excluding those who had been in follow-up of the oncological disease for more than five years. For statistical analysis, measures of central tendency and dispersion were used, as well as absolute and relative frequencies. Multiple logistic regression was applied to evaluate factors associated with mortality, considering statistically significant values of p < 0.05. Results: 85 patients were included in the study. Death was higher for patients with solid tumors (OR= 3.64; 95% CI, 1.06-12.52; p = 0.04), in addition to those who required renal support while in ICU (OR = 6.88; 95% CI, 1.82-25.98; p = 0.004), those who could not be extubated (OR= 8.00; 95% CI, 2.16-29.67; p = 0.002) and who presented an alveolar distension pressure value greater than 15cmH2O for at least one day (OR= 5.9; 95% CI, 1.76-19.80; p = 0.004). Conclusion:Clinical and IMV characteristics were associated with death in cancer patients with COVID-19 and IMV

Perceptions of pregnant women on antenatal care visit during their first trimester at area 25 health center in Lilongwe, Malawi - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Initiation of antenatal care during the first trimester is crucial for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, only 24% of pregnant women in Malawi initiate antenatal care during this time with even lower rates of 15% at Area 25 Health Centre in Lilongwe. Despite such cases, there is little literature on obstacles that prevent women from accessing first-trimester antenatal care in Malawi. AIM: To explore perceptions of pregnant women and how they influence antenatal care visits during the first trimester at Area 25 Health Centre in Lilongwe, Malawi. METHODS: We employed a qualitative exploratory study on 55 purposely identified participants. The participants were aged between 18 and 37 years with a gestational period of 36 weeks and below and attended antenatal care at Area 25 Health Centre in Lilongwe Urban, Malawi. Data were collected by MN and 2 data collectors from 19th March 2021 to 16th April 2021 through a total of 15 In-depth Interviews (IDIs) and four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Data were manually analysed using thematic analysis, which included categorization and deductive theme identification with reference to the study objectives and the Health Belief Model (HBM). RESULTS: Pregnant women perceived that the first-trimester antenatal care visits were only for those experiencing ill health conditions like backache, headache, and HIV/AIDS during pregnancy. First-trimester pregnancy was perceived as too small and not worthy of seeking antenatal care; the women placed a low value on it. The majority of those who initiated antenatal care in the first trimester had previously experienced disorders and complications such as previous cesarean sections and abortions. In addition to limited knowledge about the required total number of ANC visits, challenges such as long-distance, preoccupation with business, multiple antenatal visits, scheduling of antenatal care visits, negative attitude of health workers, adherence to COVID-19 containment measures, and inadequate partner support, were identified as barriers to seeking antenatal care during the first trimester. CONCLUSION: The negative perceptions among pregnant women, coupled with various health systems, socio-economic and individual barriers, contributed to low attendance rates for first trimester antenatal care in Malawi. Addressing knowledge gaps and overcoming barriers related to economic, individual and health care delivery can improve women's early antenatal care visits. Future research should consider the pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds to gain a better understanding of these perceptions and barriers.