Paving the way for affordable and equitable liposomal amphotericin B access worldwide.

Amphotericin B has long been crucial for treating many serious infectious diseases, such as invasive fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis, particularly for patients who are immunocompromised, including those with advanced HIV infection. The conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation has largely been replaced in high-income countries with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB), which has many advantages, including lower rates of adverse events, such as nephrotoxicity and anaemia. Despite an evident need for LAmB in low-income and middle-income countries, where mortality from invasive fungal infections is still substantial, many low-income and middle-income countries still often use the amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation because of a small number of generic formulations and the high price of the originator LAmB. The pricing of LAmB is also highly variable between countries. Overcoming supply barriers through the availability of additional quality-assured, generic formulations of LAmB at accessible prices would substantially facilitate equitable access and have a substantial effect on mortality attributable to deadly fungal infections.

Canadian status of "not acceptable" drugs as evaluated by Prescrire: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The independent French drug bulletin Prescrire International rates the therapeutic innovation of new drug-indications approved for marketing in France using an ordinal scale with the lowest rating being "not acceptable". This study investigates whether these drugs were approved by Health Canada. METHODS: A list of "not acceptable" drug-indications was generated by handsearching all issues of Prescrire International between January 2013 and December 2022. The generic names, indications and reasons why Prescrire labeled them not acceptable were recorded. The approval date was determined by consulting the website of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The status of these drug-indications in Canada was determined by searching multiple Health Canada websites. Therapeutic Evaluations for new drug-indications done by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) were recorded. RESULTS: Prescrire rated 57 new drug-indications and 42 new indications for existing drugs as not acceptable. Seventy of these drug-indications were available in Canada- 42 new drug-indications and 28 new indications for existing drugs. Twenty (90.9%) of the 22 new drugs evaluated by the PMPRB were rated as slight/no therapeutic improvement and 2 as moderate therapeutic improvement. The median difference, in days, between approval times by the EMA/ANSM and Health Canada was 129 (interquartile range -102, 341) in favour of the former. DISCUSSION: The majority of the not acceptable drug-indications were approved by Health Canada. The difference between when Prescrire and Health Canada examined the evidence for these drug-indications is unlikely to explain the difference in their evaluations. A change in regulatory standards at Health Canada may be one factor behind the presence of these drugs. To what degree those drugs led to more harms than benefits for patients who are taking them needs to be urgently investigated. Finally, the reasoning behind Health Canada's approval of these drugs should be interrogated.

Analytical considerations for characterization of generic peptide product: A regulatory insight.

The Peptide therapeutics market was evaluated to be around USD 45.67 BN in 2023 and is projected to witness massive growth at a CAGR of around 5.63 % from 2024 to 2032 (USD 80.4 BN). Generic peptides are expected to reach USD 27.1 billion by 2032 after the patent monopoly of the pioneer peptides expires, and generic peptides become accessible. The generic manufacturers are venturing into peptide-based therapeutics for the aforementioned reasons. There is an abundance of material accessible regarding the characterization of peptides, which can be quite confusing for researchers. The FDA believes that an ANDA applicant may now demonstrate that the active component in a proposed generic synthetic peptide drug product is the "same" as the active ingredient in a peptide of rDNA origin that has previously been approved. To ensure the efficacy, safety, and quality of peptide therapies during development, regulatory bodies demand comprehensive characterization utilizing several orthogonal methodologies. This article elaborates the peptide characterization by segmenting into different segments as per the critical quality attribute from identification of the peptide to the physicochemical property of the peptide therapeutics which will be required to demonstrate the sameness with reference product based on the size of the peptide chain and molecular weight of the peptides. Article insights briefly on each individual technique and the orthogonal techniques for each test were explained. The impurities requirements in the generic peptides as per the regulatory requirement were also discussed.

Drug Prices After Patent Expirations in High-Income Countries and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.

Importance: Understanding how patent expirations affect drug prices is crucial because price changes directly inform accurate cost-effectiveness assessments. This study investigates the association between patent expirations and drug prices in 8 high-income countries and evaluates how the changes affect cost-effectiveness assessments. Objective: To analyze how the expiration of drug patents is associated with drug price changes and to assess the implications of these price changes for cost-effectiveness evaluations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study performed an event study design using data from 8 high-income countries to assess the association between patent expiration and drug prices, and created a simulation model to understand the implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. The simulation cost-effectiveness model analyzed the implications of including or ignoring postpatent price dynamics. Exposure: Drug patent expiration. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in drug prices and differences in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering vs ignoring postpatent price dynamics. Results: The sample comprised 505 drugs undergoing patent expiration in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, UK, and US. Price decreases were statistically significant over the 8 years after patent expiration, with the fastest price declines observed in the US: 32% (95% CI, 24%-39%) in year 1 after patent expiration and 82% (95% CI, 71%-89%) in the 8 years after patent expiration. Estimates for other nations ranged from a decrease of 64% in Australia to 18% in Switzerland in the 8 years after expiration. The cost-effectiveness simulation model indicated that not accounting for generic entry into the market may produce biased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 40% to -40%, depending on the scenario. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study demonstrate that drug prices were reduced substantially after patent expirations in high-income countries. Therefore, incorporating information on patent status and pricing dynamics in cost-effectiveness assessment analyses is necessary for producing accurate economic evaluations of new drugs.

Establishing Virtual Bioequivalence and Clinically Relevant Specifications for Omeprazole Enteric-Coated Capsules by Incorporating Dissolution Data in PBPK Modeling.

Currently, Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III are the only biological exemptions of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms eligible for regulatory approval. However, through virtual bioequivalence (VBE) studies, BCS class II drugs may qualify for biological exemptions if reliable and validated modeling is used. Here, we sought to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR), and VBE models for enteric-coated omeprazole capsules, to establish a clinically-relevant dissolution specification (CRDS) for screening BE and non-BE batches, and to ultimately develop evaluation criteria for generic omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. To establish omeprazole's IVIVR based on the PBPK model, we explored its in vitro dissolution conditions and then combined in vitro dissolution profile studies with in vivo clinical trials. The predicted omeprazole pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and parameters closely matched the observed PK data. Based on the VBE results, the bioequivalence study of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules required at least 48 healthy Chinese subjects. Based on the CRDS, the capsules' in vitro dissolution should not be < 28%-54%, < 52%, or < 80% after two, three, and six hours, respectively. Failure to meet these dissolution criteria may result in non-bioequivalence. Here, PBPK modeling and IVIVR methods were used to bridge the in vitro dissolution of the drug with in vivo PK to establish the BE safety space of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. The strategy used in this study can be applied in BE studies of other BCS II generics to obtain biological exemptions and accelerate drug development.

Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence and Safety Assessment of Two Venlafaxine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release (ER) capsules are commonly used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of generic formulations with reference products is essential to ensure therapeutic equivalence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of Chinese-manufactured venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release capsules compared with USA-manufactured EFFEXOR® XR in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed conditions. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in China) or the reference formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in the USA). The bioequivalence of the two drugs was assessed using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC0-t) and the maximum observed concentration (Cmax). RESULTS: A total of 28 subjects were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either the test or reference capsule. All the subjects completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety analyses. The mean AUC0-t and Cmax of venlafaxine and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine were comparable between the test and reference products with both parameters close to 100% and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals within the specified 80-125% bioequivalence boundary. Safety was also assessed between the two products and all adverse events (AEs) in this study were mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Both the test and reference venlafaxine hydrochloride ER capsules were bioequivalent and showed a similar safety and tolerability profile in the population studied. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Publicity Platform ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html ) with registration number CTR20211243, date: June 1, 2021.

Effectiveness and safety of GnRH antagonist originator and generic in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aims to determine whether the live birth rates were similar between GnRH antagonist original reference product Cetrotide® and generic Ferpront®, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigates COS cycles utilizing GnRH antagonist protocols. The research was conducted at a specialized reproductive medicine center within a tertiary care hospital, spanning the period from October 2019 to October 2021. Within this timeframe, a total of 924 cycles were administered utilizing the GnRH antagonist originator, Cetrotide® (Group A), whereas 1984 cycles were undertaken using the generic, Ferpront® (Group B). Results: Ovarian reserve markers, including anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle number, and basal follicular stimulating hormone, were lower in Group A compared to Group B. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance these markers between the groups. After PSM, baseline clinical features were similar, except for a slightly longer infertile duration in Group A versus Group B (4.43 ± 2.92 years vs. 4.14 ± 2.84 years, P = 0.029). The duration of GnRH antagonist usage was slightly longer in Group B than in Group A (6.02 ± 1.41 vs. 5.71 ± 1.48 days, P < 0.001). Group B had a slightly lower number of retrieved oocytes compared to Group A (14.17 ± 7.30 vs. 14.96 ± 7.75, P = 0.024). However, comparable numbers of usable embryos on day 3 and good-quality embryos were found between the groups. Reproductive outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate, did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses suggested that the type of GnRH antagonist did not independently impact the number of oocytes retrieved, usable embryos, good-quality embryos, moderate to severe OHSS rate, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rate. Conclusion: The retrospective analysis revealed no clinically significant differences in reproductive outcomes between Cetrotide® and Ferpront® when used in women undergoing their first and second COS cycles utilizing the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Does Price Really Matter for Generic Alternatives? Supervised learning Approaches in Deciding the Right Price for Acceptable Quality Attributes of Amlodipine Besylate among Generic Alternatives.

The price and safety of finished pharmaceutical preparations are two major concerns while prescribing medicine. In this work, machine learning-based classification models were developed with respect to the quality attributes of 258 samples covering 9 marketed amlodipine (AMLO) formulations. The quantitation of AMLO and its three sulfonate ester genotoxic impurities of besylate counter ion was settled using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-diode-array detection method. The classification of correlation between dependent and independent variables was exercised using linear discriminant analysis models. The linear dispersion of acceptable quality attributes was significantly different for AMLO besylate formulation with unit price per tablet "<1 Rs." Although the correlations between price and quality are well-understood associations group centroid distance for price group "2-3 Rs." and "1-2 Rs." reveal that acceptable quality dispersion was similar for both groups. Nonetheless, a higher price could allow storage of the finished formulation to be kept on the shelf for a longer period.

Measuring and Understanding Market Exclusivity Length for New Prescription Drugs in France, Australia, and the USA.

BACKGROUND: Originator drug manufacturers use several strategies to delay generic competition in the USA, but it remains unclear whether this results in longer market exclusivity compared to other countries. OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand how drug market exclusivity lengths vary between the USA and two comparable countries. METHODS: We focused on drugs approved within 2 years of each other in the USA, France, and Australia from 1995 to 2005, and we compared the lengths of exclusivity from marketing approval through first generic competition or June 2023 using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Among 165 drugs in common between the USA and France, the median length of exclusivity was slightly longer in France (15.0 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0-19.6) than the USA (14.5 years, IQR: 11.7-17.6). Among 100 drugs in common between the USA and Australia, the median length of exclusivity was longer in Australia (16.3 years, IQR: 13.9-22.4) than in the USA (14.4 years, IQR: 12.0-17.1). CONCLUSIONS: Market exclusivity lengths in the USA are not longer than in France and Australia. Potential reasons include the larger US market and incentives that offer transient high generic drug prices in the USA for manufacturers that successfully challenge originator market exclusivity.

Cheaper is not always better: Drug shortages in the United States and a value-based solution to alleviate them.

Drug shortages threaten patients' access to medications and are associated with adverse health outcomes and increased costs. Drug shortages disproportionately occur among generic drugs of limited profitability, most notably drugs administered by injection. In this perspective, we discuss how reimbursement and purchasing practices that were meant to create an efficient marketplace for generics have generated strong price pressure that threatens profitability in certain markets. We further explain how, faced with limited profitability, manufacturers lack incentives to invest in resilient supply chains, and in some cases, engage in cost-containment strategies or decide to exit the market, ultimately contributing to shortages. We propose the development and implementation of value-based reimbursement to provide needed incentives for drug purchasers and manufacturers to establish a more reliable supply chain as part of the policy solution to reduce the number and extent of drug shortages. This reimbursement model would necessitate the development of a rating system that measures supply chain resilience and maturity for each generic product. This rating would then be applied as a value-based modifier to reimbursement rates for generic products. The proposed model would result in higher reimbursement rates for generic products from more dependable supply chains, generating incentives for manufacturers to invest in supply chain resiliency. We propose the application of this reimbursement system originally in Medicare given Congressional interest on reforming Medicare payment to prevent drug shortages.

Evaluation of the Generic Drug User Fee Act (GDUFA) Program for Fiscal Years 2013-2022.

The effectiveness of the regulatory initiatives, strategies, and incentives put forth in the first two authorizations of the Generic Drug User Fees Act (GDUFA) were evaluated using factors including the number of Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) withdrawals and first-cycle approvals. GDUFA was originally authorized in 2012 for FY 2013-2017 (GDUFA I) and reauthorized for FY 2018-2022 (GDUFA II). ANDA approvals were analyzed from the Drugs @ FDA database covering 2013-2022. From the applications, the approval time, dosage form and route of administration (ROA), product indication, market status of the product, first generic status, company and company size filing the ANDA were noted. Despite the COVID pandemic, there was more than a 40% increase in ANDA approvals during GDUFA II relative to GDUFA I. Oral and parenteral drugs were the two leading categories of approved generics during both iterations of GDUFA. There was more than a 120% increase in withdrawn applications during GDUFA II, which reflects the partial refund that is now offered to incentivize companies to withdraw inadequate applications prior to review. This also appears to have contributed to an increase in the number of first-cycle approvals, which increased by 100% between GDUFA I and II. Due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, there was a decrease in activity within the generic drug program and market. Therefore, it is important to consider this impact when observing actual trends from this study.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Estradiol Valerate Tablet and Its Generic: A Phase 1 Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Chinese Postmenopausal Female Subjects.

Purpose: Estradiol valerate (Progynova®) is used as hormone therapy to supplement estrogen deficiency. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of an estradiol valerate tablet and its generic form, under fasting and fed conditions. Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was conducted on healthy postmenopausal Chinese female volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. For each period, the subjects received either a 1 mg tablet of estradiol valerate or its generic. Blood samples were collected before dosing and up to 72 hours after administration. Plasma levels of total estrone, estradiol, and unconjugated estrone were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Results: A total of 54 volunteers were enrolled in this study. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, were similar for the two drugs under both fasting and fed conditions, with 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of these parameters, all meeting the bioequivalence criterion of 80-125%. A total of 48 adverse events (AEs) were reported in the fed study compared with 24 AEs in the fasting study. Conclusion: Estradiol valerate and its generic form were bioequivalent and well tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.

Prescription writing pattern among the dental practitioners of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency and types of prescription errors, assess adherence to WHO prescribing indicators, and highlight the gaps in current prescribing practices of Junior dental practitioners in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2021 to March 2021. The study included the prescriptions by house surgeons and junior postgraduate medical trainees for walk-in patients visiting the dental outpatient department. A total of 466 prescriptions were evaluated for WHO core drug prescribing indicators. The prescription error parameters were prepared by studying the WHO practical manual on guide to good prescribing and previous studies. Prescription errors, including errors of omission related to the physician and the patients, along with errors of omission related to the drug, were also noted. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 25. Descriptive analysis was performed for qualitative variables in the study. RESULTS: The average number of drugs per encounter was found to be 3.378 drugs per prescription. The percentage of encounters with antibiotics was 96.99%. Strikingly, only 16.95% of the drugs were prescribed by generic names and 23.55% of drugs belonged to the essential drug list. The majority lacked valuable information related to the prescriber, patient, and drugs. Such as contact details 419 (89.9%), date 261 (56%), medical license number 466 (100%), diagnosis 409 (87.8%), age and address of patient 453 (97.2%), form and route of drug 14 (3%), missing drug strength 69 (14.8%), missing frequency 126 (27%) and duration of treatment 72 (15.4%). Moreover, the wrong drug dosage was prescribed by 89 (19%) prescribers followed by the wrong drug in 52 (11.1%), wrong strength in 43 (9.2%) and wrong form in 9 (1.9%). Out of 1575 medicines prescribed in 466 prescriptions, 426 (27.04%) drug interactions were found and 299 (64%) had illegible handwriting. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the prescription writing practices among junior dental practitioners are below optimum standards. The average number of drugs per encounter was high, with a significant percentage of encounters involving antibiotics. However, a low percentage of drugs were prescribed by generic name and from the essential drug list. Numerous prescription errors, both omissions and commissions, were identified, highlighting the need for improved training and adherence to WHO guidelines on good prescribing practices. Implementing targeted educational programs and stricter regulatory measures could enhance the quality of prescriptions and overall patient safety.

Pharmacokinetics of Generic Pediatric Dolutegravir Dispersible Tablet in Thai Young Children Living With HIV Weighing Below Twenty Kilograms.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir (DTG) dispersible tablet (DTG-DT) is a pediatric-friendly formulation. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics and virologic responses of generic DTG-DT in children weighing <20 kg. METHODS: Children living with HIV-1 and <7 years of age weighing 6 to <20 kg were eligible. A generic 10-mg scored DTG-DT was administered to children using 3 weight bands (WB): WB1 (6 to <10 kg), WB2 (10 to <14 kg) and WB3 (14 to <20 kg), at doses of 20 mg (higher than World Health Organization recommendation of 15 mg), 20 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Steady-state intensive pharmacokinetics (PK) was performed in fasting condition with blood sampling at predose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 24 hours postdose. DTG PK parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental analysis, and DTG trough concentrations (C 24 ) and 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve were calculated. Comparisons were made with ODYSSEY and IMPAACT 2019. And 90% effective concentration of 0.32 mg/L was used as a reference individual DTG C 24 concentration. RESULTS: From August 2021 to March 2023, 29 Thai children with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.2 (1.5-4.8) years were enrolled; 8 in WB1, 9 in WB2 and 12 in WB3. All children were treatment experienced and 59% had HIV RNA <200 copies/mL. Overall geometric mean (coefficient of variation percentage) DTG C 24 was 1.0 (46%) mg/L [WB1, 0.9 (53%); WB2, 0.9 (27%); WB3, 1.2 (51%)]. Geometric mean (coefficient of variation percentage) 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve was 83.2 (24%) mg h/L [WB1, 84.3 (31%); WB2, 76.9 (16%); WB3, 87.6 (25%)]. At weeks 24 and 48, 90% and 92% of participants had plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Generic DTG-DT provided adequate drug exposure in children weighing 6 to <20 kg. The exploratory dose of DTG 20 mg for children weighing 6 to <10 kg showed similar PK parameters to World Health Organization doses in the other WB.

A phase III, multicentre, randomised, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of generic preservative-free Latanoprost (Polpharma S.A.) compared to Xalatan® (Pfizer) in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), often associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP), can lead to permanent damage of the optic nerve, concomitant visual field loss, and blindness. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analogue, reduces IOP and is used to treat glaucoma. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of Latanoprost Polpharma, a generic preservative-free latanoprost 0.05 mg/ml eye drops solution, in lowering IOP when compared to the originator Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution, Pfizer). METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial carried out in 5 sites in Hungary and Russia. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test product when compared to the reference product with respect to the differences in the mean diurnal IOP on Day 1 (baseline) and Day 29. The secondary endpoints included efficacy, ocular tolerance, safety, and usability. We recruited adult patients (18-75 years) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomised and received at least one dose of the test or reference product. A virtually identical reduction of the mean diurnal IOP of 7.04 ± 2.14 mmHg or 7.17 ± 2.11 mmHg was found after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 44). In the intention to treat analysis, the reduction was 7.29 ± 2.53 mmHg (95% CI: 6.55-8.04) or 7.43 ± 2.78 mm Hg (95%CI: 6.61-8.24) after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 47). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost Polpharma was shown to be non-inferior to Xalatan®. Both investigational products were equally well tolerated and safe. The data show a trend in favour of the test product with regards to the severity of hyperaemia and to the velocity of remission of ocular discomfort. Latanoprost Polpharma, being preservative-free, also avoids the cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride, the side effects of which may affect patient compliance and lower the quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had the ethical and regulatory approval from the National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYEI, OGYEI/41,779- 11/2018) and the Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology (KFEB) of Hungary and from the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (MOH of Russia) prior to the beginning of the study (642/25.12.2018) (clinical trial identification number: 848,300,144/0103/1 - POP03; IND number/EudraCT number: 2018-001727-39).

Therapeutic-driven framework for bioequivalence assessment of complex topical generic drug products.

Despite the continuous research on understanding how topical drugs and the skin interact, the development of a topical generic product remains a challenge. Due to their local action effect rather than systemic, establishing suitable frameworks for documenting bioequivalence between reference and test formulations is anything but straightforward. In previous years, clinical endpoint trials were considered the gold standard method to demonstrate bioequivalence between topical products. Nevertheless, significant financial and time resources were required to be allocated owing to the inherent complexity of these studies. To address this problem, regulatory authorities have begun to accept alternative approaches that could lead to a biowaiver, avoiding the need for clinical endpoint trials. These alternatives encompass various in vitro and/or in vivo techniques that have been analysed and the benefits and drawbacks of each method have been considered. Furthermore, other factors like the integration of a quality by design framework to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the product and process quality attributes have also been taken into account. This review delves into international regulatory recommendations for semisolid topical products, with a focus on those established by the European Medicines Agency, as well as the Food and Drug Administration. Both approaches were carefully examined, discussing aspects such as acceptance criteria, sample size, and microstructure evaluation. Additionally, novel and innovative therapeutic-driven approaches based on in vitro disease models for the rapid and effective development of topical generic products are presented.

Underdosed generic specialty medications: A prescription for patient harm?

The use of generic specialty medications amongst individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) has expanded due to an increase in the number of available agents. We describe a woman who was denied continued use of brand name teriflunomide (AubagioⓇ), despite being clinically stable for 2.5 years, and switched to generic teriflunomide. She experienced a significant spinal cord exacerbation within a few months of starting treatment. We analyzed 3 generic teriflunomide agents, including the one used for treatment, in addition to AubagioⓇ. The generic teriflunomide used by our patient contained 55.5 % content of the labeled amount, well below U.S. FDA specifications.

[Comparison of Preparation Efficiency and Therapeutic Safety between Brand-Name and Generic Products of Pemetrexed].

At Oita University Hospital, we switched our usage of pemetrexed(PEM)from brand-name to generic drugs. We conducted a comparative study of the preparation efficiency and therapeutic safety with the brand-name product and examined the economic effect thereof. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was investigated retrospectively using electronic medical records for patients who received PEM brand-name and generic drugs at our hospital between April 2021 and December 2022. The preparation time per mg was significantly shorter in the generic group at 0.17(0.08-0.38)seconds compared to 0.34(0.15-0.94)seconds for the brand-name group(p<0.01). Regarding the safety comparison, none of the 13 eligible patients developed new hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities of Grade 2 or higher after switching to the generic product. The switch to generics had an economic impact of 7,369,278 yen during the study period. The results suggest that switching from brand-name to generic products is reasonable from the perspectives of therapeutic safety and economic benefits, as well as the expected improvement in preparation efficiency.

Why sedative hypnotics often fail in development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug development to support anaesthesia and sedation has been slow with few candidates emerging from preclinical discovery and limited innovation beyond attempted reformulation of existing compounds. RECENT FINDINGS: The market is well supported by low-cost generic products and development compounds have not been shown to improve patient outcomes or possess other distinctive characteristics to justify the cost of development. SUMMARY: To make progress in a large-volume, low margin and highly competitive environment requires meaningful advances in relevant basic science. Opportunities exist, but probably require bolder initiatives than further attempts at reformulation or fiddling with the structure of propofol. Extending development ambitions to include nonanaesthesiologist providers challenges professional boundaries but may facilitate cost-effective changes in patterns of care.