Successful Premedication With Sublingual Midazolam Using a Suction Toothbrush.

Premedication is often used to reduce the stress associated with anesthesia-related procedures. However, in some cases, patients may not cooperate with medication delivery because of significant fear and anxiety. We report a case of an uncooperative patient with severe intellectual disabilities who was successfully premedicated with the unique technique of sublingual midazolam administration using a suction toothbrush. The 38-year-old male patient was planned to receive dental treatment under deep intravenous sedation (IVS), but he refused both intravenous cannulation and mask induction. Preanesthetic medication delivery using other routes was attempted but not accepted. As the patient tolerated toothbrushing, we used repeated practice with sublingual water administration through the toothbrush's suction hole to gradually desensitize the patient. Using that same method, sublingual midazolam was administered as a successful premedication to allow placement of a face mask for inhalational induction without distress and completion of the dental treatment under IVS. For patients who refuse other premedication routes, sublingual administration during toothbrushing with a suction toothbrush may provide a successful alternative.

Use of Video Directly Observed Therapy and Characteristics Associated With Use Among Patients Treated With Buprenorphine in an Office-based Setting.

OBJECTIVES: Video directly observed therapy (video DOT) is a tool for confirming buprenorphine adherence that could complement the use of urine toxicology; research is needed to characterize the patients who are receptive and able to use this technology. We aimed to describe video DOT utilization and assess participant characteristics associated with use. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a pilot randomized controlled trial of adults who recently initiated sublingual buprenorphine in office-based programs, restricting to intervention arm participants, which consisted of 12 weeks of video DOT via a mobile health technology platform. Participants were instructed to record at least 1 daily video of buprenorphine self-administration. Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to measure associations between participant characteristics and frequency of submitted videos. RESULTS: The sample included 39 participants. Of 3276 possible videos, 1002 (31%) were submitted. Age ≥40 years (relative risk [RR], 2.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.31-4.91]) and once-daily buprenorphine dosing (RR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.76-5.48]) were positively associated with video submissions. Non-White race (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.19-0.97]), less than high school education (RR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10-0.74]), history of previous buprenorphine treatment (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.25-0.97]), and ≥3 previous treatment attempts (RR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07-0.37]) were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Video DOT utilization resulted in about a third of expected videos, although there were differences in use according to age, race, buprenorphine treatment factors, and educational status. Such differences underscore that mobile-health interventions such as video DOT may not be equally used by all patients.Trial Registration : ClinicalTrails.gov , NCT03779997 , registered on December 19, 2018.

Dental adverse effects of sublingual buprenorphine and naloxone.

Overview of: Etminan M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, et al. Association between sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone exposure and dental disease. JAMA. 2022;328:2269-71.

Efficacy of reconstituted intravenous fentanyl to sublingual solution versus oral morphine syrup for breakthrough pain among patients with chronic gynecologic cancer pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Rapid-acting fentanyl formulations are superior to oral morphine (OM) syrup in controlling breakthrough pain among patients with cancer, but they are expensive and unavailable in many countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of reconstituted intravenous fentanyl to sublingual solution (IFS) in relieving breakthrough pain as compared with OM. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial, patients with gynecologic cancer aged ≥18 years experiencing chronic cancer pain with breakthrough pain were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either 50 µg IFS or 5 mg OM. Pain intensity level was assessed at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after treatment. The primary outcome was the reduction in pain intensity at 15 min in the intention-to-treat population (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05037539). RESULTS: Between June 15, 2021 and December 30, 2021, 40 participants were equally and randomly assigned to receive IFS or OM. The primary outcome was significantly higher in the IFS group (4.25 vs. 1.05, p < 0.0001). The secondary outcomes also showed higher reduction in pain intensity at 5 min in the IFS group. Subsequent breakthrough pain did not differ between the two groups. However, the reduction in pain was lower in the IFS group at 45, 60, and 120 min, where pain was classified as mild. No severe adverse effects were observed in both groups. Burning sensation without noticeable lesion was found in 20% of the IFS group. CONCLUSION: IFS can reduce early breakthrough pain. IFS may be considered for breakthrough pain when rapid-acting fentanyl formulations are unavailable.

[Development of New Sublingual Formulation for Transmucosal Delivery of Peptides].

Since oral bioavailability of peptides is extremely low, self-injectable and intranasal formulations have been developed; however, these treatments have problems such as storage and discomfort. The sublingual route is considered suitable for peptide absorption because there is less peptidase and it is not subject to hepatic first-pass effects. In this study, we attempted to develop a new jelly formulation for sublingual delivery of peptides. Gelatins with molecular weights of 20000 and 100000 were used as the jelly base. The gelatin was dissolved in water with a small amount of glycerin and air-dried for at least 1 d to form a thin jelly formulation. A mixed base of locust bean gum and carrageenan was used as the outer layer of the two-layer jelly. Jelly formulations with various compositions were prepared, and we evaluated the dissolution time of the jelly formulations and urinary excretion. It was found that the dissolution time of the jelly became slower as the amount of gelatin and the molecular weight increased. Using cefazolin as a model drug, urinary excretion after sublingual administration was measured, and it was found that urinary excretion tended to increase when using a two-layer jelly covered with a mixed base of locust bean gum and carrageenan compared to oral administration of an aqueous solution. Our findings suggest that sublingual drug absorption could be improved by allowing the drug eluted from the jelly formulation to remain in sublingual region for a longer time.

Cationic nanocapsule suspension as an alternative to the sublingual delivery of nifedipine.

Nifedipine (NIFE) is a calcium channel blocker drug used to treat cardiovascular diseases, angina, and hypertension. However, NIFE is photolabile, has a short biological half-life, low aqueous solubility, and undergoes an intense first-pass effect, compromising its oral bioavailability. Thus, this study aimed to develop NIFE-loaded nanocapsules for sublingual administration. Nanocapsule suspensions of Eudragit® RS100 and medium chain triglycerides containing NIFE were prepared by the interfacial deposition of preformed polymer technique. The developed formulations showed particle size around 170 nm, polydispersity index below 0.2, positive zeta potential, and acid pH. The NIFE content was 0.98 ± 0.03 mg/mL, and the encapsulation efficiency was 99.9%. The natural light photodegradation experiment showed that the nanocapsules were able to provide NIFE photoprotection. The nanocapsules reduced the cytotoxicity of NIFE and showed no genotoxic effects in the Allium cepa model. Through the HET-CAM test, the formulations were classified as non-irritating. The developed nanocapsule suspension demonstrated a controlled release of NIFE and mucoadhesive potential. The in vitro permeation assay showed that the nanocapsules favored the NIFE permeation to the receptor compartment. In addition, the nanocapsules provided greater drug retention in the mucosa. Thus, the development of polymeric nanocapsule suspensions showed that this system could be a promising platform for NIFE sublingual administration.

Case series: Voluntary discontinuation of sublingual buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder using extended-release buprenorphine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite its efficacy, patients may still seek to voluntarily discontinue sublingual (SL) buprenorphine treatment, but little guidance exist on how to safely conduct a taper. We, therefore, report on the use of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) to facilitate voluntary treatment discontinuation. METHODS: A case series (n = 4). RESULTS: Four individuals interested in voluntary discontinuation of sublingual buprenorphine treatment were transitioned to varying durations of XR-BUP, after which all were able to discontinue buprenorphine with minimal withdrawal symptoms. One individual had a brief recurrence to illicit opioid use. All remained engaged in treatment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The use of XR-BUP, given its long terminal half-life, may be a helpful option for individuals who are interested in voluntary buprenorphine discontinuation. Collaboration with the patient must include information about the risk of lapse to use and overdose following discontinuation. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The cases reported here provide preliminary support for the use of XR-BUP to help individuals discontinue buprenorphine treatment. There is only one other case series showing the use of XR-BUP in helping individuals successfully discontinue buprenorphine treatment. Buprenorphine discontinuation is clinically relevant and there is little guidance in the current literature.

Association Between Sublingual Buprenorphine-Naloxone Exposure and Dental Disease.

This study examines the association of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone and dental adverse events using the IQVIA health claims database.

[ENHANCED CLINICAL EFFECTS OF CEDARCURE® TABLETS OF SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY OVER THE YEARS OF TREATMENT AND THE IMPACT OF OUTCOME BY COMBINED USE OF MITE SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY (DUAL SLIT) FOR JAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSIS].

BACKGROUND: We examined the clinical effects of Cedarcure® tablets for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and examined the enhancement of the effects over the years of treatment. METHODS: The subjects were 358 patients who treated with SLIT (126 of third year of treatment, 102 of second year, 130 of first year) in a single clinic. The clinical efficacy was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) of nose, eye and total symptoms during the peak season of moderate amount of pollen dispersal (2485 grains/cm2/season) in 2022. Concomitant medication scores were calculated by Japanese guidelines. Because many cases of combined use of mite SLIT (dual SLIT) were included in the subjects, we compared cedar SLIT alone and dual SLIT as a secondary analysis. RESULTS: Clinical efficacy improved with the years of treatment, and all assessments of VAS in the 3rd year were significantly better than in the 1st year of treatment (p<0.01). The third year was better with sneezing and nasal discharge than the 2nd year, and the 2nd year was better with itchy eyes than the 1st year (p<0.05). Drug scores were also lower in the 3rd and 2nd years than in the 1st year (p<0.05). Additional mite SLIT did not affect the results. CONCLUSION: Cedarcure® showed enhancement of the effects over the years of treatment by the analysis up to the third year. Both Cedar SLIT alone and Dual SLIT showed similar efficacy on cedar pollinosis.

Mucosal Adjuvants Delivered by a Mucoadhesive Patch for Sublingual Administration of Subunit Vaccines.

Among mucosal administration routes for vaccines, the sublingual route has been proven capable of inducing a potent systemic and mucosal immune response. However, the absence of a simple and compliant delivery system and the lack of robust mucosal adjuvants impede the development of sublingual vaccines. Here, we describe a mucoadhesive patch made of a layer-by-layer assembly of polysaccharides, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid. The mucoadhesive patch was covered by adjuvanted nanoparticles carrying viral proteins. We showed that the nanoparticles effectively cross the outer layers of the sublingual mucosa to reach the epithelium. Furthermore, the encapsulated adjuvants, 3M-052 and mifamurtide, targeting toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 (NOD2), respectively, remain fully active after encapsulation into nanoparticles and exhibit a cytokine/chemokine signature similar to the mucosal gold-standard adjuvant, the cholera toxin. However, the particulate adjuvants induced more moderate levels of proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6 and keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC), suggesting a controlled activation of the innate immune response.

Comparison of the characteristics of patients treated with sublingual vs. long-acting injectable buprenorphine formulations for treatment of opioid use disorder: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-BPN) was introduced in recent years as a novel treatment for opioid use disorder. Despite growing evidence-base of its effectiveness, there is limited research on the relationship between this treatment and patient characteristics. METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective cohort study compared sociodemographic and clinical variables between patients treated with SL-BPN and those treated with LAI-BPN at a large metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia. RESULTS: Patients that transitioned to LAI-BPN were more likely to be single, have a comorbid mental illness, untreated hepatitis C infection and longer duration of unsanctioned opioid use. Patients continuing treatment with SL-BPN were more likely to fail to attend appointments and have urine drug screen results positive for gabapentinoids. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contribute to currently limited literature on this novel treatment option in an Australian context, highlighting factors which may influence patient and prescriber treatment choices. Clinicians may be more inclined to prescribe LAI-BPN to patients with higher psychosocial comorbidity to facilitate engagement in treatment.

Cell-penetrating albumin enhances the sublingual delivery of antigens through macropinocytosis.

Innovations in oral immunotherapy have greatly advanced the therapeutic control of allergies. However, these therapeutic effects suffer from the fact that the amount of antigen delivered to antigen-presenting cells is limited given the formulations that are currently available. We recently designed a cell-penetrating albumin and found that this modified albumin enters cells via the induction of macropinocytosis. Herein, we report on a novel system for delivering antigens based on cell-penetrating albumin-inducible macropinocytosis that allows larger amounts of antigens to be delivered to antigen-presenting cells. A treatment with cell-penetrating albumin significantly increased the permeability of ovalbumin (45 kDa) or dextran (2000 kDa) on monolayers derived from human oral squamous carcinoma cells. Flow cytometric analyses showed that the cell-penetrating albumin treatment resulted in a significant elevation in the amount of dextran that was delivered to two types of antigen-presenting cells. Finally, mice that had been sensitized by Japanese cedar pollen extract (JCPE) and cell-penetrating albumin showed a decline in the frequency of nose-rubbing against a subsequent intranasal administration of JCPE. These findings suggest that the sublingual administration of cell-penetrating albumin efficiently delivers antigens to antigen-presenting cells via the induction of macropinocytosis, resulting in an enhancement in the therapeutic effect of sublingual immunotherapy.

Sublingual apomorphine therapy as an alternative to complex continuous infusion pumps in advanced Parkinson's disease treatment: a district nurse-led intervention.

In the UK, Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to affect an annual incidence of 15-20 per 100 000 of the population over the age of 60. Service users living with advanced-stage PD require the use of apomorphine, which is generally used to control symptoms. The district nursing service plays a key role in monitoring and in the administration of apomorphine therapy. Although apomorphine is effective, skin problems such as nodules are commonly reported adverse events that can complicate efficiency of treatment. A sublingual delivery route to apomorphine has been known for years as a feasible alternative to subcutaneous route. Collaboration between the multidisciplinary team is essential to meet the complex needs of service users with advanced PD. However, due to the increase in demands of the district nurse service, this time crucial intervention can be unpredictable to meet. An alternative route can enable district nurses to become less task-orientated. However, an increased risk of oral cavity related adverse events should be taken into consideration with the sublingual administration of apomorphine.

Pediatric sublingual allergen immunotherapy.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) offers an important therapeutic modality in the management of children with respiratory allergies. Along with subcutaneous immunotherapy, these modalities are the only selections that have shown not merely relief of symptoms but also disease-modifying activity. SLIT can be given as either a dissolvable tablet (SLIT-T) or liquid drops (SLIT-D). In studies that examined the efficacy and safety in allergic rhinitis and asthma, SLIT-T and SLIT-D both show efficacy in reducing symptoms and the need for medication, although it seems that SLIT-T may show a better response. Almost all SLIT-D efficacy studies are with single allergens. There are virtually no data on the efficacy of mixing unrelated allergens in the same prescription. Both SLIT-T and SLIT-D treatments are safe, with the most common adverse effects being local ones, such as oral pruritus and mouth irritation, which tend to be mild and short lived. Studies that assess the role of SLIT in the prevention of new sensitizations and asthma in the pediatric population are insufficient and of mixed results; therefore, no conclusions can be made. In the treatment of other pediatric conditions, such as food allergy and atopic dermatitis, there are few studies that assessed if, and the degree of, the benefit with SLIT. In determining if SLIT should be prescribed for the pediatric patient, there is a need for shared decision-making to allow the older child and parents or caregivers to understand the pros and cons, and the costs of all the options and relate their values and preferences to the physician.

Long-term efficacy of the sublingual and subcutaneous routes in allergen immunotherapy.

Allergen immunotherapy is highly effective in selected patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, and Hymenoptera venom allergy. Unlike anti-allergic drugs, both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies have been shown to modify the underlying cause of the disease, with proved long-term clinical benefits after treatment cessation. In this review, we analyzed 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy that included blinded follow-up for at least 1 year after treatment withdrawal. Three studies of pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy provided evidence that a sustained, tolerogenic effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy can be achieved after 3 years of treatment. Six trials of sublingual immunotherapy provided robust evidence for long-term clinical benefit and persistent immunologic changes after grass pollen, house-dust mite, or Japanese cedar immunotherapy, whereas a clinical trial of both sublingual and subcutaneous grass pollen immunotherapies showed that 2 years of immunotherapy were efficacious but insufficient to induce long-term tolerance. These studies strongly supported international guidelines that recommend at least 3 years of allergen immunotherapy of proven value to achieve disease modification and sustained clinical and immunologic tolerance.