Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) disturbs the estrous cycle, ovulation rate, oocyte cell communication and calcium homeostasis in mice.

Perfluoroalkyl substances are man-made chemicals with ample consumer and industrial applications. They are widely used and are resistant to environmental and metabolic degradation. Several studies have evaluated the effects of Perfluorohexane sulfonate on reproduction. However, there are few reports exploring the cell and molecular mechanisms of its toxicity in the ovary. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of PFHxS exposure on the estrous cycle, ovulation rate, and the underlying mechanisms of action in female mice in vivo. The animals received a single sub-lethal dose of PFHxS (25.1 mg/kg, 62.5 mg/kg) or vehicle and were stimulated to obtain immature cumulus cell-oocyte complexes (COCs) from the ovaries, or superovulated to develop mature COCs. To evaluate oocyte physiology, Gap-junction intercellular communication (GJIC) was analyzed in immature COCs and calcium homeostasis was evaluated in mature oocytes. PFHxS exposure prolonged the estrous cycle and decreased ovulation rate in female mice. Connexins, Cx43 and Cx37, were downregulated and GJIC was impaired in immature COCs, providing a possible mechanism for the alterations in the estrous cycle and ovulation. No morphological abnormalities were observed in the mature PFHxS-exposed oocytes, but calcium homeostasis was affected. This effect is probably due, at least partially, to deregulation of the endoplasmic reticulum calcium modulator, Stim1. These mechanisms of ovarian injury could explain the reported correlation among PFHxS levels and subfertility in women undergoing fertility treatments.

Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations.

Objective: To compare cumulative live birth rate (LBR) between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and GnRH antagonist protocols of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles in different populations. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 865 patients were enrolled and separate analyses were performed for three populations: 498 patients with predicted normal ovarian response (NOR), 285 patients with PCOS, and 82 patients with predicted poor ovarian response (POR). The primary outcome was cumulative LBR for one oocyte retrieval cycle. The results of response to ovarian stimulation were also investigated, including numbers of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, 2PN, blastocysts, good-quality blastocysts, and usable blastocysts after biopsy, as well as rates of oocyte yield, blastocyst formation, good-quality blastocysts, and moderate or severe OHSS. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify potential confounders that may be independently associated with cumulative live birth. Results: In NOR, the cumulative LBR of PPOS protocol was significantly lower than that of GnRH antagonists (28.4% vs. 40.7%; P=0.004). In multivariable analysis, the PPOS protocol was negatively associated with cumulative LBR (adjusted OR=0.556; 95% CI, 0.377-0.822) compared to GnRH antagonists after adjusting for potential confounders. The number and ratio of good-quality blastocysts were significantly reduced in PPOS protocol compared to GnRH antagonists (2.82 ± 2.83 vs. 3.20 ± 2.79; P=0.032 and 63.9% vs. 68.5%; P=0.021), while numbers of oocytes, MII oocytes and 2PN did not show any significant difference between GnRH antagonist and PPOS protocols. PCOS patients had similar outcomes as NOR. The cumulative LBR of PPOS group appeared to be lower than that of GnRH antagonists (37.4% vs. 46.1%; P=0.151), but not significantly. Meanwhile, the proportion of good-quality blastocysts in PPOS protocol was also lower compared to GnRH antagonists (63.5% vs. 68.9%; P=0.014). In patients with POR, the cumulative LBR of PPOS protocol was comparable to that of GnRH antagonists (19.2% vs. 16.7%; P=0.772). There was no statistical difference in the number and rate of good-quality blastocysts between the two protocols in POR, while the proportion of good-quality blastocysts appeared to be higher in PPOS group compared to GnRH antagonists (66.7% vs. 56.3%; P=0.182). In addition, the number of usable blastocysts after biopsy was comparable between the two protocols in three populations. Conclusion: The cumulative LBR of PPOS protocol in PGT cycles is lower than that of GnRH antagonists in NOR. In patients with PCOS, the cumulative LBR of PPOS protocol appears to be lower than that of GnRH antagonists, albeit lacking statistical difference, whereas in patients with diminished ovarian reserve, the two protocols were comparable. Our findings suggest the need for caution when choosing PPOS protocol to achieve live births, especially for normal and high ovarian responders.

Adverse cardiovascular effect following gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus GnRH agonist for prostate cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy is the mainstay of medical treatment for prostate cancer (Pca); however, it is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events and death. To date, CV death has been the leading noncancer cause of death in Pca patients. Both GnRH antagonists (an emerging class of drugs) and GnRH agonists (most frequently prescribed) are efficacious against Pca. However, the adverse effects, especially the adverse CV effect between them remain unclear. Methods: Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, all available studies comparing the safety of CV risk between GnRH antagonists and GnRH agonists in Pca patients were extracted. Comparisons of outcomes of interest between these two classes of drugs were calculated using the risk ratio (RR). Subgroup analyses were performed depending on the study design and preexisting CV disease at baseline. Results: Nine randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and five real-world observational studies comprising 62160 Pca patients were included in our meta-analysis. Patients receiving GnRH antagonists experienced fewer CV events (RR: 0.66, 95% CI:0.53-0.82, P<0.001), CV death (RR:0.4, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P<0.001) and myocardial infarctions (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, P=0.03). No difference was found in the incidence of stroke and heart failure. Moreover, GnRH antagonists were associated with fewer CV events in patients with preexisting CV disease but not in those without preexisting CV disease in the RCT series. Conclusion: GnRH antagonists appear to offer favorable safety in terms of adverse CV events and CV death compared with GnRH agonists among men diagnosed with Pca, especially those who had established CV disease at baseline. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-2-0009/, identifier INPLASY202320009.

Comparison of uterine, endometrial and subendometrial blood flows in predicting pregnancy outcomes between fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer after GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare endometrial receptivity and pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in normal ovarian responders. The patients were divided into two groups: the fresh ET group and the frozen-thawed ET group. Uterine artery resistance index (RI) and endometrial thickness were lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial-subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. There was no significant difference in miscarriage rate between the two groups. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher CPR (56.0% vs. 48.1%), implantation rate (32.2% vs. 26.4%), and LBR (45.4% vs. 36.5%) than the fresh ET group. In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The clinical pregnancy rate following fresh embryo transfer (ET) was lower than frozen-thawed ET after GnRH antagonist protocol. IVF success depends on embryo quality, embryo-endometrium interaction and endometrial receptivity. A good blood supply toward the endometrium is generally considered a requirement for implantation.What do the results of this study add? Uterine artery RI and endometrial thickness were significantly lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial-subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate than the fresh ET group after GnRH antagonist protocol.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate.

Effect of anti-estrogen and anti-progesterone on spermatogenesis, testosterone production and expression of steroidogenic enzyme genes in adult male rats.

The present study was planned to investigate the anti-spermatogenic and anti-steroidogenic effects of Clomiphene Citrate (CC) an anti-estrogen and Mifepristone (MT) an anti-progesterone in the testis of male rats. Following the oral administration of 1.0 mg and 5.0 mg/kg b.w/day of each for the duration of 30 and 60 days, quantitation of spermatogenesis, RIA for serum and intra-testicular testosterone levels, western blotting and RT-PCR for expression of StAR, 3ß-HSD and P450arom enzymes in the testis was done. Clomiphene Citrate at 5.0 mg/kg b.w/day for 60 days significantly reduced testosterone (T) levels however the effect was not significant with the lower doses. Reproductive parameters in animals treated by Mifepristone remained mostly unaffected, however, a significant decline in testosterone levels and altered expression of selected genes was observed in 5.0 mg for the 30d treatment group. Clomiphene Citrate at higher doses affected the weights of the testis and secondary sex organs. Seminiferous tubules revealed hypo-spermatogenesis with a significant decrease in the number of maturing germ cells and a reduction in tubular diameter. Attenuation in serum testosterone was associated with the downregulation of expression in StAR, 3ß-HSD, and P450arom mRNA and protein levels in the testis even after 30 d of CC administration. The results indicate that the anti-estrogen (Clomiphene Citrate) but not anti-progesterone (Mifepristone) induces hypo-spermatogenesis in rats which are associated with a downregulation of expression of two of the steroidogenic enzymes, 3ß-HSD and P450arom mRNA and StAR protein.

Controlled ovarian stimulation for endometriosis patients with ultra-long GnRH-agonist or GnRH-antagonist protocols: A retrospective study by propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVES: Although in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer is the most effective treatment for infertile patients with endometriosis, ovarian stimulation protocols are controversial. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 639 patients with endometriosis from January 2016 to June 2020; 111 and 528 patients were treated with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and ultra-long GnRH agonist protocols, respectively. Potential baseline differences between the regimens were adjusted by propensity score matching. Clinical and laboratory data, including the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), were compared. RESULTS: Ovulation induction required significantly longer use of gonadotropins in the GnRH agonist group. However, the GnRH agonist group had a lower starting dose of gonadotropin (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, significantly lower clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates were observed in the GnRH antagonist group receiving fresh assisted reproductive technology cycles (all p < 0.05); however, pregnancy outcomes using the subsequent freeze-thaw cycles for the same oocyte retrieval were not significantly different. CCPR and CLBR for the oocyte retrieval cycles of the antagonist and ultra-long agonist protocols were similar. The ultra-long agonist protocol resulted in more favorable implantation of fresh embryos and improved clinical outcomes of the fresh cycle. CONCLUSIONS: This novel strategy could be appropriate for endometriosis patients who are temporarily unsuitable for fresh embryo transfer. The GnRH antagonist protocol can be combined with the whole embryo freezing strategy to achieve CCPR and CLBR similar to the ultra-long agonist regimen, thus simultaneously avoiding the long pre-treatment duration of GnRH agonists during the ultra-long agonist protocol.

Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve.

Objective: To evaluate different starting doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) on pregnancy outcomes for patients with normal ovarian reserve during gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol-controlled ovarian stimulation of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 1138 patients undergoing IVF cycles following the GnRH-ant protocol were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the starting dose of rhFSH. 617 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU, and 521 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU. We compared demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation and embryological characteristics, and pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the possible effects of the known potential confounding factors on pregnancy outcomes. Results: The number of oocytes retrieved in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly lower than those in the 225 IU rhFSH group. There was no significant difference between the two groups referring to embryological characteristics. The proportion of fresh embryo transfer in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly higher than that in the 225 IU rhFSH group (48.30% vs. 40.90%), and there was no difference in the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU for ovarian stimulation has a similar pregnancy outcome as starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU in GnRH-ant protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve. Considering the potential cost-effectiveness and shorter time to live birth, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU may be more suitable than 225 IU.

Recombinant-luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GNRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the beneficial effect of recombinant-luteinizing Hormone (r-LH) addition in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and whether an optimal time of Recombinant-Luteinizing Hormone (r-LH) supplementation exist during the controlled of stimulation (COS). The primary outcomes are clinical Pregnancy rate and the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary outcomes are the number of metaphase II oocytes, miscarriage rate and live birth rate. Results show that supplementation of LH generated a greater number of oocytes retrieved than patients who did not receive LH supplementation, but it did not help with other pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, the result of the subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the outcomes with different LH addition times.

Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.

Profile of Linzagolix in the Management of Endometriosis, Including Design, Development and Potential Place in Therapy: A Narrative Review.

Estrogens play a critical role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and it is logical to assume that lowering estradiol levels with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may prove effective, especially in women who fail to respond to progestogens. Indeed, due to progesterone resistance, oral contraceptives and progestogens work well in two-thirds of women suffering from endometriosis, but are ineffective in 33% of women. Oral GnRH antagonists have therefore been evaluated for management of premenopausal women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. The first publication on these drugs reported the efficacy of elagolix. The present paper is a narrative review of linzagolix, which is an orally administered GnRH receptor antagonist with low pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability. It binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, resulting in a dose-dependent drop in luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production. This reduction in LH and FSH levels in turn leads to a dose-dependent decline in estrogen. Phase 2 and 3 trials are reviewed and discussed here. There is a place for GnRH antagonists in the management of symptomatic endometriosis, and linzagolix with or without add-back therapy (ABT) is one option that can be used at low doses, avoiding the need for ABT, which is contraindicated in some patients.

Stop GnRH-agonist/GnRH-antagonist protocol: a different insight on ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Ovarian stimulation (OS) is one of the key factors in the success of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), by enabling the recruitment of numerous healthy fertilizable oocytes and, thereby, multiple embryos. The Stop GnRH-agonist/GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ag/GnRH-ant), which offers all the advantages of using long suppressive GnRH-ag, with GnRH-ant, is in my opinion a valuable addition to the armamentarium of OS protocols. It allows cycle programming, better follicular synchronization and offers successful outcome in a variety of challenging cases such as poor responders, Poseidon group 4 poor prognosis patients, those with elevated peak progesterone (P) serum levels, poor embryo quality or repeated IVF failures.

Transcranial direct current stimulation for bipolar depression: systematic reviews of clinical evidence and biological underpinnings.

Despite multiple available treatments for bipolar depression (BD), many patients face sub-optimal responses. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been advocated in the management of different conditions, including BD, especially in treatment-resistant cases. The optimal dose and timing of tDCS, the mutual influence with other concurrently administered interventions, long-term efficacy, overall safety, and biological underpinnings nonetheless deserve additional assessment. The present study appraised the existing clinical evidence about tDCS for bipolar depression, delving into the putative biological underpinnings with a special emphasis on cellular and molecular levels, with the ultimate goal of providing a translational perspective on the matter. Two separate systematic reviews across the PubMed database since inception up to August 8th 2022 were performed, with fourteen clinical and nineteen neurobiological eligible studies. The included clinical studies encompass 207 bipolar depression patients overall and consistently document the efficacy of tDCS, with a reduction in depression scores after treatment ranging from 18% to 92%. The RCT with the largest sample clearly showed a significant superiority of active stimulation over sham. Mild-to-moderate and transient adverse effects are attributed to tDCS across these studies. The review of neurobiological literature indicates that several molecular mechanisms may account for the antidepressant effect of tDCS in BD patients, including the action on calcium homeostasis in glial cells, the enhancement of LTP, the regulation of neurotrophic factors and inflammatory mediators, and the modulation of the expression of plasticity-related genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the matter to concurrently provide a synthesis of the clinical evidence and an in-depth appraisal of the putative biological underpinnings, providing consistent support for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tDCS.

Prediction of ovarian response using the automated Elecsys anti-Müllerian hormone assay in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the capability of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measured using the automated Elecsys® AMH immunoassay to (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd) determine ovarian response after fertility treatment? DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective, observational, cohort study including women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Serum AMH concentrations were determined using the Elecsys AMH immunoassay based on one blood sample drawn 6 months or less before treatment. Stimulation was conducted in accordance with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Patients were divided into four ovarian response categories based on their oocyte yield: low (0-3), suboptimal (4-9), optimal (10-15) and high (>15). Areas under the curve were calculated for each ovarian response group. RESULTS: Overall, 1248 patients were enrolled. The AMH concentration had a strong positive correlation with oocyte yield (Spearman's rho = 0.74, P < 0.001). Areas under the curve (95% CI) for AMH predicting ovarian response were 0.85 (0.83 to 0.88) for low and 0.89 (0.87 to 0.91) for high response. Optimal serum AMH cut-offs for predicting a low and high response using the Elecsys AMH immunoassay were 6.4 pmol/l (0.89 ng/ml) and 14.2 pmol/l (1.99 ng/ml), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis showed that 47% (R2 = 0.470) of variation in ovarian response could be attributed to AMH alone, increasing to 50.9% (R2 = 0.509) with the addition of age, body weight, and total dose of gonadotrophin. CONCLUSION: Ovarian response and oocyte yield after stimulation in a GnRH antagonist cycle can be predicted with high accuracy using a single determination of serum AMH before ovarian stimulation.

Targeting the Progesterone Receptor in Breast Cancer: Mind the Short Form!

SUMMARY: The presurgical window of opportunity trial (WOT) MIPRA provides evidence that neoadjuvant treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist mifepristone (RU486) may benefit patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer characterized by a high ratio of PR-A versus PR-B isoform (>1.5), suggesting that PR may be targeted in a subset of patients. See related article by Elía et al., p. 866.

Analysis of relative factors and prediction model for optimal ovarian response with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

Objective: To explore the relative factors for best ovarian response in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and to establish a nomogram prediction model of ovarian response. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of the clinical data of 1,944 patients who received assisted reproductive treatment in the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from April 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020. According to the number of oocytes obtained, there were 659 cases in the low ovarian response group (no more than five oocytes were retrieved), 920 cases in the normal ovarian response group (the number of retrieved oocytes was >5 but ≤18), and 365 cases in the high ovarian response group (>18 oocytes retrieved). Independent factors affecting ovarian responsiveness were screened by logistic regression, which were the model entry variables, and a nomogram prediction model was established based on the regression coefficients. Results: There were statistically significant differences in age, anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle count, the diagnosis of endometriosis, decreased ovarian reserve, polycystic ovary syndrome, basal follicle-stimulating hormone and basal luteinizing hormone among the three groups (P < 0.001). Multifactorial stepwise regression analysis showed that female age (0.95 [0.92-0.97], P = 0.000), decreased ovarian reserve (0.27 [0.19-0.38]), P = 0.000), endometriosis (0.81 [0.56-0.86], P = 0.000), antral follicle count (1.09 [1.06-1.12], P = 0.000), basal follicle-stimulating hormone (0.90 [0.85-0.96], P = 0.001), Anti-Mullerian hormone (1.19 [1.13-1.26], P= 0.000) and luteinizing hormone on trigger day (0.73 [0.66-0.80], P= 0.000), were independent factors for the occurrence of different ovarian responses during ovarian hyperstimulation. The predictive model of ovarian responsiveness was constructed based on the above factors, and the model was verified with 589 patients' data from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, at this center. The predicted ovarian response (number of eggs obtained) of a total of 450 patients was consistent with the actual results, with a coincidence degree of 76.4%, and the consistency index of the model is 0.77. Conclusion: The nomogram model was successfully developed to effectively, intuitively, and visually predict the ovary reactivity in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and provide guidance for clinical practice.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Plenty of studies explored the most optimal treatment protocol for infertile women with adenomyosis in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) /intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), however, there is still no consensus on which treatment protocol is ideal for these women at present. So, we conducted this study comparing the pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis who underwent GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy or long-acting GnRH agonist protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study and a propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis including 282 women diagnosed with adenomyosis undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle from January 2016 to July 2021 at the Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, China. The patients were divided into two groups: the GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy (n = 168) and the long-acting GnRH agonist protocol with fresh embryo transfer (n = 114) according their treatment protocols. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Cumulative live birth rate was also calculated. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, clinical pregnancy rate (49.40% vs 64.04%; odds ratio (OR) 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.37; P = 0.358), live birth rate (36.90% vs 45.61%; OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.61 to 2.00, P = 0.753) and cumulative live birth rate (51.79% vs 64.04%; OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.74, P = 0.796) were not significantly different between the GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol. Similar results were conducted in PSM analysis with clinical pregnancy rate (46.48% vs 60.56%; OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.76 to 2.34; P = 0.321), live birth rate (32.39% vs 45.07%; OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.72, P = 0.463) and cumulative live birth rate (54.90% vs 60.60%; OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.74, P = 0.958). CONCLUSIONS: For infertile women with adenomyosis, these two treatment protocols resulted in similar pregnancy outcomes. Larger, prospective studies are needed in the future.

Comparison of clinical effects between early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in 3310 cycles: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It is the duty of doctors to choose a safe, simple, economic and effective controlled ovulation stimulation (COS) protocol for the patients. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of the early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist (EFPL) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-Ant) protocols, hoping to provide some reference for clinicians when choosing COS program. METHODS: A retrospective study included 3310 ovum pick up cycles undergoing assisted reproductive technology during January 2019 to May 2022 in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to improve the comparability between the two protocols. Subgroups were divided according to age, body mass index (BMI) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). The live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, the endometrial thickness, fresh embryo transplantation rate, chemical pregnancy rate, CPR were significantly higher in EFPL group than that in GnRH-Ant group (P < 0.001). The E2, LH, P values on trigger day were significantly lower in EFPL group (P < 0.001). The cycle cancellation rate was significantly reduced in EFPL group (P < 0.001). However, the total amount of Gn and duration of Gn were significantly increased in the EFPL group (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the LBR was significantly higher in EFPL group after matching [OR (95%CI), 1.86 (1.13, 3.05), P = 0.02], especially for those with age < 35 years [OR (95%CI), 1.95 (1.14, 3.34), P = 0.02], BMI < 24 kg/m2 [OR (95%CI), 2.08 (1.14, 3.80), P = 0.02], AMH levels ≥ 4.5 ng/ml [OR (95%CI), 4.19 (1.53, 11.43), P < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: EFPL regimen is more suitable to elicit live birth for those young patients with BMI < 24 kg/m2 and AMH ≥ 4.5 ng/ml. However, for patients with decreased ovarian reserve or advanced age, EFPL regimen has no advantage over the GnRH-Ant regimen.

High initial FSH dosage reduces the number of available cleavage-stage embryos in a GnRH-antagonist protocol: Real-world data of 8,772 IVF cycles from China.

To evaluate the relationship between the initial follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) dose and the number of available cleavage-stage embryos in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.We included 8772 fresh IVF cycles using a GnRH antagonist protocol at the Genetic and Reproductive Institution of Chongqing, P. R. China, from January 2016 to June 2021.Univariate linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between the initial FSH dosage (≤ 150, 187.5-200, 225, 250, or 300 IU) with the number of available cleavage-stage embryos on day 3. A two-factor linear regression model was applied to calculate the threshold effect of the initial FSH dosage on the number of available cleavage-stage embryos based on a smoothing plot. The initial FSH dose was negatively correlated with the number of available cleavage-stage embryos, independent of female age, body mass index, infertility factors, duration of infertility, anti-Müllerian hormone and basal FSH levels, antral follicle count and the proportions of patients with poor ovarian response or polycystic ovarian syndrome. Using a two-factor linear regression model, we calculated the inflection point to be 200 IU of FSH. The relationship between the initial FSH dose and the number of available cleavage-stage embryos was nonlinear. The initial FSH dose was negatively associated with the number of available cleavage-stage embryos when the initial FSH dose was > 200 IU. Therefore, clinicians should try to avoid unnecessarily increasing the initial FSH dose.

Repositioning Mifepristone as a Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality and is projected to become the second-most common cause of cancer mortality in the next decade. While gene-wide association studies and next generation sequencing analyses have identified molecular patterns and transcriptome profiles with prognostic relevance, therapeutic opportunities remain limited. Among the genes that are upregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), the leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cytokine belonging to IL-6 family, has emerged as potential therapeutic candidate. LIF is aberrantly secreted by tumour cells and promotes tumour progression in pancreatic and other solid tumours through aberrant activation of the LIF receptor (LIFR) and downstream signalling that involves the JAK1/STAT3 pathway. Since there are no LIFR antagonists available for clinical use, we developed an in silico strategy to identify potential LIFR antagonists and drug repositioning with regard to LIFR antagonists. The results of these studies allowed the identification of mifepristone, a progesterone/glucocorticoid antagonist, clinically used in medical abortion, as a potent LIFR antagonist. Computational studies revealed that mifepristone binding partially overlapped the LIFR binding site. LIF and LIFR are expressed by human PDAC tissues and PDAC cell lines, including MIA-PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. Exposure of these cell lines to mifepristone reverses cell proliferation, migration and epithelial mesenchymal transition induced by LIF in a concentration-dependent manner. Mifepristone inhibits LIFR signalling and reverses STAT3 phosphorylation induced by LIF. Together, these data support the repositioning of mifepristone as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of PDAC.