Genetic factors in the pathogenesis of cardio-oncology.

In recent years, with advancements in medicine, the survival period of patients with tumours has significantly increased. The adverse effects of tumour treatment on patients, especially cardiac toxicity, have become increasingly prominent. In elderly patients with breast cancer, treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity has surpassed cancer itself as the leading cause of death. Moreover, in recent years, an increasing number of novel antitumour drugs, such as multitargeted agents, antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs), and immunotherapies, have been applied in clinical practice. The cardiotoxicity induced by these drugs has become more pronounced, leading to a complex and diverse mechanism of cardiac damage. The risks of unintended cardiovascular toxicity are increased by high-dose anthracyclines, immunotherapies, and concurrent radiation, in addition to traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and obesity. However, these factors do not fully explain why only a subset of individuals experience treatment-related cardiac toxicity, whereas others with similar clinical features do not. Recent studies indicate that genetics play a significant role in susceptibility to the development of cardiovascular toxicity from cancer therapies. These genes are involved in drug metabolism, oxidative damage, cardiac dysfunction, and other processes. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that epigenetics also plays a role in drug-induced cardiovascular toxicity. We conducted a review focusing on breast cancer as an example to help oncologists and cardiologists better understand the mechanisms and effects of genetic factors on cardiac toxicity. In this review, we specifically address the relationship between genetic alterations and cardiac toxicity, including chemotherapy-related genetic changes, targeted therapy-related genetic changes, and immune therapy-related genetic changes. We also discuss the role of epigenetic factors in cardiac toxicity. We hope that this review will improve the risk stratification of patients and enable therapeutic interventions that mitigate these unintended adverse consequences of life-saving cancer treatments.

Adverse social determinants of health elevate uncontrolled hypertension risk: a cardio-oncology prospective cohort study.

The role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in controlling hypertension (HTN) in cancer patients is unknown. We hypothesize that high SDOH scores correlate with uncontrolled HTN in hypertensive cancer patients. In our prospective study, patients completed the Protocol for Responding to & Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks & Experiences questionnaire. After integrating home and clinic blood pressure readings, uncontrolled HTN was defined as systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Using Cox regression, we analyzed the impact of SDOH on HTN control, adjusting for relevant factors. The study involved 318 participants (median age 66.4, median follow-up 166 days, SDOH score 6.5 ± 3.2), with stress, educational insecurity, and social isolation as prevalent adverse SDOH. High SDOH scores led to 77% increased risk of uncontrolled HTN (adjusted hazards ratio = 1.77; 95% confidence interval = 1.10 to 2.83, P = .018). Urban residents with high SDOH scores were at an even greater risk. Identifying SDOH and mitigating underlying factors may help control HTN, the most typical disease process treated in all cardio-oncology clinics.

Understanding cardiac events in breast cancer (UCARE): pilot cardio-oncology assessment and surveillance pathway for breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In Ireland, over 3000 patients are diagnosed with breast cancer annually, and 1 in 9 Irish women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. There is evidence that female breast cancer survivors are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than their age-matched counterparts. Specific services for cancer patients suffering from cancer therapy related cardiovascular toxicity have led to a higher incidence of safe anti-cancer treatment completion. Such services are not widely available in our jurisdiction, and the purpose of this trial is to remedy this situation. METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective, single arm, pilot feasibility study implementing a dedicated Cardio-Oncology assessment and surveillance pathway for patients receiving multimodal breast cancer treatment. It incorporates novel biomarker and radiomic surveillance and monitoring approaches for cancer-therapy related cardiac dysfunction into routine care for breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Declaration of results will via peer reviewed academic journals, and communicated directly to key knowledge users both nationally and internationally. This engagement will be critical to enable to healthcare services and policy sector make informed decisions or valuable changes to clinical practice, expenditure and/or systems development to support specialized Cardio-Oncology clinical pathways. All data is to be made available upon request. CONCLUSION: Dedicated cardio-oncology services have been recommended in recent literature to improve patient outcomes. Our protocol describes a feasibility study into the provision of such services for breast cancer.

Cardio-Oncology: A New Discipline in Medicine and Its Relevance to Hematology.

Cardio-oncology, a burgeoning subspecialty, addresses the complex interplay between cardiology and oncology, particularly in light of increased cardiovascular (CV) disease mortality in cancer patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cardio-oncology with a focus on the therapies used in hematological malignancies. We explore the bidirectional relationship between heart failure and cancer, emphasizing the need for collaborative care. The review discusses risk stratification, highlighting the importance of baseline CV risk assessment and personalized surveillance regimens. Primary and secondary prevention strategies, including pharmacological interventions, are outlined. The review also delves into the cardiotoxicity associated with hematological cancer therapies, focusing on anthracyclines, Bruton kinase inhibitors, BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, multiple myeloma treatments, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We then highlight the high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolisms in cancer patients and the challenges of anticoagulation management in cardio-oncology. Finally, the review touches on the importance of long-term follow-up and appropriate screening in cancer survivors at high risk of CV morbidity and mortality, based on their CV risk profile and the type and dose of cardiotoxic therapies they received such as anthracyclines or high radiation doses.

[The Cardio-Oncology Guideline - A Comprehensive Approach to Managing Cardiovascular Risks in Cancer Patients]. / Update zur ESC-Leitlinie Kardioonkologie.

The emerging field of cardio-oncology addresses the critical need for specialized cardiovascular care in cancer patients, given the overlapping risk factors and potential cardiovascular complications of oncological therapies. In collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the first cardio-oncology guideline was developed and published in 2022. This guideline comprises 272 recommendations covering risk stratification before therapy initiation, monitoring during oncological treatment, and the diagnosis and treatment of therapy-associated cardiovascular side effects.A significant innovation in this guideline is the comprehensive risk stratification approach, which categorizes patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on therapy-specific factors. This allows for tailored cardiovascular care during therapy, with varying frequencies of follow-up examinations depending on the patient's risk level. Notably, the guideline emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists to optimize patient outcomes.Overall, the cardio-oncology guideline represents a significant advancement in addressing the complex cardiovascular needs of cancer patients. Its comprehensive recommendations and emphasis on interdisciplinary care underscore the importance of optimizing cardiovascular health throughout the oncological treatment journey.This review provides an overview of the guidelines and updates on the risk stratification and therapy of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis (ICIM), as well as the role of statins in protecting against anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity.

Dutch cardio-oncology cohort: Incident cardiovascular disease predisposes to a higher cancer mortality rate.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are the two leading causes of death worldwide. Given their high prevalence, it is important to understand the disease burden of cancer mortality in CVD patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether patients with incident CVD have a higher risk of malignancy-related mortality, compared to the general population without CVD. METHODS: We performed a national population-based cohort study selecting patients with incident CVD in the Netherlands between 01 April 2000 and 31 December 2005. A reference cohort was selected from the Dutch population using age, sex and ethnicity. Mortality follow-up data were evaluated after data linkage of national registries from Statistics Netherlands until 31 December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2,240,879 individuals were selected with a mean follow-up of 12 years (range 0.4-21.0), of which 738,666 patients with incident CVD with a mean age of 71 ± 15 years. Malignancy mortality per 1000 person years was 84 for the reference group and 118 for patients with CVD, with the highest rate of 258 in patients with heart failure. Patients with CVD had a higher malignancy mortality risk, compared to the reference group: HR 1.35 (95%CI 1.33-1.36). Highest risks were observed in patients with venous diseases (HR 2.27, 95%CI 2.17-2.36) and peripheral artery disease (HR 1.87, 95%CI 1.84-2.01). CONCLUSION: Results show that CVD predisposes to a higher cancer mortality rate. Of all CVD subtypes, HF patients have the highest cancer mortality rate and the hazards were highest in patients with venous diseases and peripheral artery disease.

[Exploration and practice of cardio-oncology].

With the improvement of oncology diagnosis and treatment, the survival time of cancer patients has been significantly prolonged, and the cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery are becoming more and more prominent, and it is in this context that the germ of Cardio-Oncology exploration has come into being. The multidisciplinary Cardio-Oncology team aims to establish a multidisciplinary prevention and control system to assess patients' baseline risk factors, individualized monitoring, and weighing the risk-benefit ratio of cancer therapy. At present, the connotation of the discipline of Cardio-Oncology has been expanded horizontally and deepened vertically in China, and Cardio-Oncology treatment centers have blossomed all over the country. Moreover, international and domestic scholars continue to improve Cardio-Oncology guidelines and consensus through their own practice, and develop artificial intelligence software to help the development of the discipline. It is believed that in the future, with the training of Cardio-Oncologists and the output of high-quality clinical research evidence, cardiovascular safety of cancer patients can be ensured more scientifically and effectively.

Cardiorenal Impact of Anti-Cancer Agents: The Intersection of Onco-Nephrology and Cardio-Oncology.

BACKGROUND: The evolving landscape of cancer treatments has introduced new challenges, particularly related to adverse events associated with chemotherapeutic agents. To address these challenges, the fields of cardio-oncology and onco-nephrology have arisen, focusing on the management of cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity attributable to anti-cancer drugs. SUMMARY: Numerous intersections between these disciplines exist, including onco-hypertension (HTN) and cardiorenal toxicities induced by chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may cause myocarditis and nephritis. This paper aimed to explore the intersection between cardio-oncology and onco-nephrology. A detailed review will be undertaken, focusing on onco-HTN and the cardiorenal toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents, with a specific emphasis on the adverse effects associated with ICIs. KEY MESSAGES: Multidisciplinary collaboration among oncologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, and other healthcare professionals is crucial for developing tailored approaches to optimize treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in modern oncology practice.

Therapy-naïve malignancy causes cardiovascular disease: a state-of-the-art cardio-oncology perspective.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Although generally thought of as distinct diseases, the intersectional overlap between CVD and cancer is increasingly evident in both causal and mechanistic relationships. The field of cardio-oncology is largely focused on the cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation). Furthermore, the cumulative effects of cardiotoxic therapy exposure and the prevalence of CVD risk factors in patients with cancer lead to long-term morbidity and poor quality of life in this patient population, even when patients are cancer-free. Evidence from patients with cancer and animal models demonstrates that the presence of malignancy itself, independent of cardiotoxic therapy exposure or CVD risk factors, negatively impacts cardiac structure and function. As such, the primary focus of this review is the cardiac pathophysiological and molecular features of therapy-naïve cancer. We also summarize the strengths and limitations of preclinical cancer models for cardio-oncology research and discuss therapeutic strategies that have been tested experimentally for the treatment of cancer-induced cardiac atrophy and dysfunction. Finally, we explore an adjacent area of interest, called "reverse cardio-oncology," where the sequelae of heart failure augment cancer progression. Here, we emphasize the cross-disease communication between malignancy and the injured heart and discuss the importance of chronic low-grade inflammation and endocrine factors in the progression of both diseases.

Precision Cardio-oncology: Update on Omics-Based Diagnostic Methods.

OPINION STATEMENT: Cardio-oncology is an emerging interdisciplinary field dedicated to the early detection and treatment of adverse cardiovascular events associated with anticancer treatment, and current clinical management of anticancer-treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) remains limited by a lack of detailed phenotypic data. However, the promise of diagnosing CTR-CVT using deep phenotyping has emerged with the development of precision medicine, particularly the use of omics-based methodologies to discover sensitive biomarkers of the disease. In the future, combining information produced by a variety of omics methodologies could expand the clinical practice of cardio-oncology. In this review, we demonstrate how omics approaches can improve our comprehension of CTR-CVT deep phenotyping, discuss the positive and negative aspects of available omics approaches for CTR-CVT diagnosis, and outline how to integrate multiple sets of omics data into individualized monitoring and treatment. This will offer a reliable technical route for lowering cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in cancer patients and survivors.