Perinatal outcomes of twin emergency cerclage: comparison with expectant treatment and singleton emergency cerclage.

The present study aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes and influencing factors in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cervical cerclage. The present retrospective cohort study included clinical data that were recorded between January 2015 and December 2021 at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (China). The study included data from 103 pregnancies (26 twin and 77 singleton pregnancies) that underwent emergency cerclage and 17 twin pregnancies that underwent expectant treatment. The median gestational age of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but higher than that of expectant treatment (28.5, 34.0 and 24.0 weeks, respectively). The median interval to delivery of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but significantly higher than that of expectantly treated twin pregnancies (37.0, 78.0 and 7.0 days, respectively).IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? An important cause of premature birth is cervical insufficiency. Cervical cerclage extends the gestational period of women with cervical insufficiency. According to 2019 SOGC's No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage, both twin and single pregnancies benefit from emergency cerclage. However, there is minimal information about the pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies.What the results of this study add? This study shows that the outcomes of pregnancy in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage were better than that of expectant treatment but worse than that in singleton pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In this study, pregnant women with cervical insufficiency in twin pregnancies can benefit from emergency cerclage, we should treat those pregnant women as early as possible.

Delayed interval delivery in a quadruplet pregnancy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: As the rate of multiple pregnancies increases, delayed interval delivery (DID) is increasingly being implemented to improve perinatal outcomes. But there are no international guidelines for DID in multiple pregnancies. We report a case of DID in a quadruplet pregnancy and review the relevant literature to summarize the management of DID in multiple pregnancies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old woman, 22 2/7 weeks' gestation, with quadruplets, was admitted to the hospital for a first cervical cerclage due to cervical dilation. Twenty-five days later, it was found that the cervix was dilated again, so after removing the cervical cerclage, the first quadruplet was delivered vaginally (25 6/7 weeks), and a second cervical cerclage was performed. Four days later, due to re-dilation of the cervix, after removal of the cervical cerclage, the second quadruplet was delivered vaginally (26 3/7 weeks), followed by a third cervical cerclage. Six days later, the pregnancy was terminated by cesarean section due to fetal distress, and the third and fourth quadruplets were delivered (27 2/7 weeks). The patient had no postoperative complications, and all four infants were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit and discharged successfully. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes that comprehensive management of delayed interval delivery can improve perinatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies, including anti-infection, tocolytic therapy, practice to promote fetal lung, and cervical cerclage.

"A stitch in time saves nine": the impact of video-based training for surgical procedures in low-resource settings.

Access to training and education in novel surgical and medical techniques is challenging in low-and- middle income settings where the burden of maternal morbidity and mortality is highest. Video-based education tools are cost effective and sustainable, and enable clinicians, even those based in rural, remote settings, to develop new skills, to improve the quality of care delivered to their patients. This is illustrated by the case of a clinician in Tanzania who successfully performed a transabdominal cerclage on two patients, after studying a video our team developed describing the technique. Both women who underwent the procedure had successful pregnancy outcomes, despite poor obstetric histories. Video is a versatile medium for delivery of training and education to medical students and doctors, and should be further integrated into surgical training curricula globally.

Efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies and factors affecting the clinical effects of emergency cerclage.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate clinical effects of emergency cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with cervical dilation ≥1.0 cm in mid-trimester of gestation and to identify risk factors after cerclage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 99 twin pregnancies with cervical dilation ≥1cm in the mid-trimester of gestation at three institutions, from December 2015 through December 2021. The cases were treated with emergency cervical cerclage (52 cases) or expectant management (47 cases). Compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors associated with cerclage. RESULTS: Cerclage placement was associated with significantly longer gestation age and prolongation of the gestational latency (p < .05). In the cases, compared to expectant treatments, spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) at <26, <28, <30, <32 weeks was significantly less frequent (p < .05). Pre-operation WBC > 11.55 × 109/L, CRP > 10.1 and cervical dilation >3.5 cm were found to be independent risk factors for delivery 28 weeks after cerclage. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with cervical dilation ≥1.0 cm in mid-trimester of gestation may prolong pregnancy and gestation age, and improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes compared with expectant management. The strongest predictor of sPTB before 28 weeks after ECC were pre-operation WBC >11.55 × 109/L, CRP > 10.1 and cervical dilation >3.5 cm.

Cervical cerclage for short cervix at 24 to 26 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether cervical cerclage for a transvaginal ultrasound-detected short cervical length after 24 weeks of gestation in singleton pregnancies reduces the risk for preterm birth. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using the following terms: "cerclage, cervical," "uterine cervical incompetence," "obstetrical surgical procedures," "cervix uteri," "randomized controlled trial," and "controlled clinical trial." STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials comparing cerclage placement with no cerclage in singleton gestations with a transvaginal ultrasound-detected short cervical length ≤25 mm between 24+0/7 and 29+6/7 weeks of gestation were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: Individual patient-level data from each trial were collected. If an eligible trial included patients with both multiple and singleton gestations with a short cervical length detected either before or after 24+0/7 weeks of gestation, only singletons who presented at or after 24+0/7 weeks were included. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation, gestational age at delivery, latency, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Individual patient-level data from each trial were analyzed using a 2-stage approach. Pooled relative risks or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as appropriate. RESULTS: Data from the 4 eligible randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 131 singletons presented at 24+0/7 to 26+6/7 weeks of gestation and were further analyzed; there were no data on patients with a cerclage at 27+0/7 weeks' gestation or later. Of those included, 66 (50.4%) were in the cerclage group and 65 (49.6%) were in the no cerclage group. The rate of preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation was similar between patients who were randomized to the cerclage group and those who were randomized to the no cerclage group (27.3% vs 38.5%; relative risk, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.28). Secondary outcomes including preterm birth <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation, gestational age at delivery, time interval from randomization to delivery, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and adverse neonatal outcomes such as low birthweight, very low birthweight, and perinatal death were similar between the 2 groups. Planned subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in the rate of preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation between the 2 groups when compared based on cervical length measurement (≤15 mm or ≤10 mm), gestational age at randomization (24+0/7 to 24+6/7 weeks or 25+0/7 to 26+6/7 weeks), or history of preterm birth. CONCLUSION: Cervical cerclage did not reduce or increase the rate of preterm birth among singleton pregnancies with a short cervical length detected after 24 weeks of gestation. Because there was a 22% nonsignificant decrease in preterm birth associated with cerclage, which is a similar amount of risk reduction often associated with ultrasound-indicated cerclage before 24 weeks' gestation, further randomized controlled trials in this patient population are warranted.

Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ultrasound-indicated cerclage and identification the influence factors for predicting preterm birth: A retrospective study of 87 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors influencing preterm birth in patients after ultrasound-indicated cerclage with different cervical lengths (CL), and explore the optimal cut-off value of CL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 87 pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and second-trimester loss that received ultrasound-indicated cerclage in our hospital between January 2004 and April 2021. Groups were divided by CL at the demarcation point of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 cm respectively. The pregnancy outcomes were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent influence factors. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the prediction capability of the associated factors. RESULTS: Significant difference was found in terms of patients delivered at ≥32 weeks of gestation (19 [55.9%]vs. 41 [77.4%], p < 0.05) and neonatal birth weight (2495 [1138,3185]vs. 2995 [2155,3235] g, p < 0.05), when the CL was categorized at the demarcation point of 1.5 cm. Body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.224, p < 0.05), a history of preterm birth and second-trimester loss (OR = 3.153, p < 0.05), and C-reactive protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L (OR = 8.097, p < 0.05) were independent risk factors for gestational age more than 28 weeks. The AUC of joint predictor A included those factors was 0.849 (95% CI: 0.701-0.998, p < 0.05). CRP>5 mg/L was found to be a significant independent risk factor for different gestational age at delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A CL of 1.5 cm was the optimal cut-off value that could help women who underwent serial CL surveillance choose ultrasound-indicated cerclage at an appropriate time. High BMI, more history of preterm birth and second-trimester loss and abnormal CRP could be used as combined predictors to recognize the risk of preterm birth (<28 weeks) post-surgery.

Effects of emergency/nonemergency cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women with cervical incompetence.

Background: Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of cerclage on preterm birth (PTB) caused by cervical incompetence remains challenging. The vaginal microbiome is associated with preterm births. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the vaginal microbiota of patients with cervical incompetence, explore the relationship between the composition of the vaginal microbiota before cervical cerclage and at term delivery, and assess the effect of cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiota. Methods: Patients (n = 30) underwent cerclage performed by the same surgical team. Vaginal swabs were obtained pre-surgery and seven days post-surgery. A gestational age-matched cohort of healthy pregnant women (n = 20) (no particular abnormality during pregnancy, delivery at term) was used as the control group and sampled during a comparable pregnancy. All collected vaginal swabs were analysed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: When comparing the healthy control and cervical cerclage groups, the enriched microorganism in the healthy controls was G. Scardovia, and the enriched microorganism of the cerclage was G. Streptococcus. α diversity was significantly increased in patients who received cerclage with preterm delivery compared with those with full-term delivery, and the enriched microorganism was F. Enterococcus. A comparison before and after nonemergency cerclage suggested that the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus and F. Lactobacillaceae before surgery. After nonemergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were F. Enterobacteriaceae and C. Gammaproteobacteria. Vaginal microbiota diversity significantly increased, and the proportion of women with Lactobacillus spp.-depleted microbiomes increased after emergency cerclage. Significant differences in ß diversity were found between the groups. Before the emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus, O. Alteromonadales, and P. Firmicutes. After emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were P. Actinobacteria, C. Actinobacteria, P. Proteobacteria, F. Bifidobacteriaceae, O. Bifidobacteriales, G. Gardnerella, and G. Veillonella. Conclusion: Cerclage (particularly emergency cerclage) may alter the vaginal microbiota by increasing microbiota diversity, decreasing vaginal Lactobacillus abundance, and increasing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria that are not conducive to pregnancy maintenance, thereby affecting surgical efficacy. Therefore, the role of the vaginal microbiome should be considered when developing treatment strategies for pregnant women with cervical incompetence. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100046305.

McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage has been used for decades to reduce preterm birth. The Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage are the most commonly used techniques with no current consensus on the preferred technique. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage techniques in preventing preterm birth. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were sourced from six electronic databases and reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies including women with a singleton pregnancy, requiring a cervical cerclage, using either the Shirodkar or McDonald technique that ran comparative analyses between the two techniques. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was preterm birth before 37 weeks, with analyses at 28, 32, 34 and 35 weeks. Secondary data were also collected on neonatal, maternal and obstetric outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen papers were included: 16 were retrospective cohort studies and one was a randomised controlled trial. The Shirodkar technique was significantly less likely to result in preterm birth before 37 weeks than the McDonald technique (relative risk [RR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98). This finding was supported by a statistically significant reduction in rates of preterm birth before 35, 34 and 32 weeks, PPROM, difference in cervical length, cerclage to delivery interval, and an increase in birthweight in the Shirodkar group. No difference was seen in preterm birth rates <28 weeks, neonatal mortality, chorioamnionitis, cervical laceration or caesarean section rates. The RR for preterm birth prior to 37 weeks was no longer significant when sensitivity analyses were performed removing studies with a serious risk of bias. However, similar analyses removing studies that utilised adjunctive progesterone strengthened the primary outcome (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93). CONCLUSION: Shirodkar cerclage reduces the rate of preterm birth prior to 35, 34 and 32 weeks' gestation when compared with McDonald cerclage; however, the overall quality of the studies in this review is low. Further, large, well-designed randomised controlled trials are required to address this important question to optimise care for women who may benefit from cervical cerclage.

Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy. METHODS: A combination of subject words and free words was used to search major domestic and foreign databases. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 studies were included that met the criteria and quality evaluation and data extraction was carried out. The data were analyzed using STATA 15 and the reporting was done in reference to the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Emergency cervical cerclage was superior to expectant treatment for the primary outcome of pregnancy prolongation (WMD = 5.752, 95% CI 5.194-6.311, 22 studies, N = 1435, I2 = 97.1%, P = 0.000). Cervical cerclage was also superior to expectant treatment for the secondary outcomes of neonatal birth weight (WMD = 1051.542, 95% CI 594.107-1508.977, 9 studies, N = 609, I2 = 96.4%, P = 0.000), neonatal Apgar 1' (WMD = 2.8720, 95% CI: 2.105-3.639, 11 studies, N = 716, I2 = 99.0%, P = 0.000), number of live births (OR = 6.018, 95% CI 2.882-12.568, 10 studies, N = 724, I2 = 55.3%, P = 0.000), deliveries after 32 weeks (OR = 8.030, 95% CI 1.38-46.892, 8 studies, N = 381, I2 = 85.9%, P = 0.021). deliveries after 34 weeks (OR = 15.91, 95% CI 5.92-42.77, 9 studies, N = 560, I2 = 59.6%, P = 0.000), number of vaginal deliveries (OR = 3.24, 95% CI 1.32-7.90, 8 studies, N = 502, I2 = 69.4%, P = 0.018), and number of neonatal survivals (OR = 9.300, 95% CI 3.472-24.910, 10 studies, N = 654, I2 = 80.5%, P = 0.000). No difference between emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment was found in patients with chorioamnionitis (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.602-4.583, 4 studies, N = 296, I2 = 16.3%, P = 0.273). CONCLUSION: Before the 28th week of pregnancy, emergency cervical cerclage can significantly prolong the gestational week and improve the neonatal survival rate, compared to expectant treatment, in women with singleton pregnancies who have a dilated uterine orifice caused by cervical insufficiency.

Measurement of cervical softness before cerclage placement with an aspiration-based device.

BACKGROUND: An abnormally soft cervix could contribute to the pathophysiology of cervical shortening and cervical insufficiency. Multiple techniques to measure cervical softness have been developed but none are used routinely in clinical practice. A clinically acceptable technique to measure cervical softness could improve identification of patients at risk for cervix-related preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure cervical softness in patients with cervical insufficiency and in normal controls using a novel, aspiration-based device. We hypothesized that the cervix is softer in patients with cervical insufficiency. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of patients presenting for cerclage at a single academic medical center. Cervical softness was measured using a noninvasive, aspiration-based device placed on the anterior lip of the cervix during a speculum examination. The device measured the aspiration pressure required to displace cervical tissue to a predefined deformation level. Stiff tissue required increased aspiration pressure, whereas soft tissue required lower pressure values. Cerclage patients were subdivided into 3 groups, namely history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, and examination-indicated cerclage. Controls were healthy volunteers between 12+0 weeks and 23+6 weeks of gestation without a history of cervical insufficiency and were matched by gestational age to the patients in the cerclage groups. Women with a cerclage in place, multiple gestations, active genital infection, or previous cervical excision procedures were excluded. Delivery information was subsequently recorded as well. RESULTS: Data from 133 women were analyzed; of those, 54 patients were in the cerclage group (23 history-indicated, 12 ultrasound-indicated, and 19 examination-indicated participants) and 79 were controls (40 in the first trimester and 39 in the second trimester groups). Patients who presented for ultrasound-indicated cerclage had significantly softer cervices (median; interquartile range) than second trimester controls (62 mbar; 50.5-114 vs 81 mbar; 75-101; P=.042). The difference in cervical softness was not significantly different between the history-indicated and examination-indicated cerclage groups and their respective control groups. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting for ultrasound-indicated cerclage had significantly softer cervices than normal controls as measured by an aspiration-based device. Quantitative measurement of cervical softness with the aspiration-based device is a promising technique for objective measurement of cervical softness during pregnancy.

[Comparison of maternal-fetal outcomes between laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and McDonald cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency].

Objective: To compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of women with cervical insufficiency (CI) undergoing McDonald cerclage (MC) and laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage (LCC), so as to provide evidence for the selection of cerclage methods. Methods: A retrospective trial was carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 221 women who underwent the prophylactic cerclage were divided into MC group (n=54), LCC with MC history group (n=28) and LCC without MC history group (n=129) by the mode of operation and whether the pregnant women who underwent LCC had MC history. General clinical data, pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the three groups. Results: (1) General clinical data: the proportion of women accepted cervical cerclage during pregnancy in MC group, LCC with MC history group and LCC without MC history group were 100.0% (54/54), 7.1% (2/28) and 27.1% (35/129), respectively (P<0.001). The indications of the three groups showed statistical significance (P=0.003), and the main indication was the history of abortion in the second and third trimester [75.9% (41/54) vs 89.3% (25/28) vs 84.5% (109/129)]. (2) Pregnancy complications: the incidence of abnormal fetal position [7.8% (4/51) vs 17.4% (4/23) vs 19.8% (24/121)], placenta accrete [5.9% (3/51) vs 13.0% (3/23) vs 11.6% (14/121)], uterine rupture [0 vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 5.8% (7/121)] in the MC group were all lower than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups. However, there were no statistical significances (all P>0.05). Intrauterine inflammation or chorioamnionitis [15.7% (8/51) vs 0 vs 0.8% (1/121)] and premature rupture of membrane [23.5% (12/51) vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 0] were both significantly higher in MC group than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (all P<0.001). (3) Pregnancy outcomes: the cesarean section rate was significantly lower in MC group (41.2%, 21/51) than that in LCC with MC history group (100.0%, 23/23) and LCC without MC history group (100.0%, 121/121; P<0.001). MC group was associated with lower expenditure than LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (12 169 vs 26 438 vs 27 783 yuan, P<0.001). The success rates of live birth cerclage did not differ significantly in MC (94.4%, 51/54), LCC with MC history (82.1%, 23/28) and LCC without MC history (93.8%, 121/129) groups (χ2=5.649, P=0.059). There was no significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit occupancy, neonatal birth weight and neonatal asphyxia between the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Both LCC and MC are the treatment choice for women with CI, which may get similar liver birth. However, MC has the advantages of low cesarean section rate, economical and easy operation. Therefore, MC is recommended as the first choice for CI patients, and LCC is for women with failed MC.

Tips and Tricks for Robotic-Assisted Trans-Broad Ligament Abdominal Cerclage in Pregnant Patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for improving safety in robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage via broad ligament window dissection. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage. SETTING: An academic tertiary care hospital. Our patient is a 32-year-old G8P2143, with a history of pregnancy loss at 19 and 23 weeks and 1 failed vaginal cerclage, presented to us at 13 weeks and 5 days for abdominal cerclage. We have completed a total of 5 successful procedures with this technique on pregnant patients ranging from 9 to 14 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal cerclage during pregnancy can be very risky and challenging to perform; however, it offers an increased success rate for continuing pregnancy [1]. Excessive bleeding and the rupture of membrane during the procedure could lead to pregnancy loss and a failed abdominal cerclage [2,3]. Therefore, seeking a feasible and safer technique would be preferable for the surgeons to decrease surgical risk and complications. We have developed a trans-broad ligament technique that would allow for the bilateral uterine vessels to be clearly exposed, thereby reducing the possibility of accidental damage to a major vessel and eliminating the risk of blind needle placement piercing through the amniotic sac resulting in rupture of membrane and subsequent pregnancy loss [4,5]. A dense adhesion band from the anterior uterus to the anterior abdominal wall was carefully taken down using the monopolar scissors. The assistant gently performed a digital vaginal examination to assist with the creation of a bladder flap. The bladder was carefully dissected off the lower uterine segment and uterus using the monopolar scissors. Bilateral uterine vessels were further skeletonized and exposed anteriorly using blunt dissection and the monopolar scissors. On the right, a window was created in the broad ligament using the monopolar scissors. The right uterine vessels were then further dissected and lateralized, creating a small window medial to the uterine vessels at the level of the internal cervical os. The mersilene tape was guided through the window from anterior to posterior. In a similar fashion, a window was created on the left; the mersilene tape was then guided from posterior to anterior. The mersilene tape was completely placed around the cervix circumferentially at the level of the internal cervical os, medial to the uterine vessels. Both ends of the mersilene tape were then pulled gently, while ensuring that the tape was lying flat on the anterior of the uterus. The tape was then tied anteriorly at the 12 o'clock position in an appropriate tension. A 2-0 silk was then sutured to the tails of the tape to ensure that it would remain in the correct location and prevent the loosening of the knot of mersilene tape. The pelvis was copiously irrigated, and hemostasis was assured. The fetal heart rate was 126 bpm, and patient was discharge next day. A healthy baby, 6 pounds 14 ounces, was delivered by cesarean section at 36 weeks 5 days because of early contractions and pain (Supplemental Appendix 1-4). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage via broad ligament window dissection offers a possibly feasible and safe technique for surgeons seeking to reduce risks, although further research is needed.

Predicting spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with cervical cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance of the predictive markers of spontaneous preterm birth, cervicovaginal quantitative fetal fibronectin (fFN) and cervical length, in asymptomatic high-risk women with transabdominal, history-indicated or ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of asymptomatic high-risk women with cervical cerclage and no other prophylactic intervention (including progesterone), who attended the preterm birth clinic at a central London teaching hospital between October 2010 and September 2016. Women had either transabdominal cerclage, placed prior to conception, history-indicated cerclage, placed before 14 weeks' gestation, or ultrasound-indicated cerclage for a short cervix (< 25 mm), placed before 24 weeks. All women underwent serial cervical length assessment on transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester (16-28 weeks), and quantitative fFN testing from 18 weeks onward. Test performance was analyzed for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks (cerclage failure), 34 weeks and 37 weeks, using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 181 women were included in the analysis. Cervical length and fFN were strong predictors of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with cerclage, with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.92), respectively. Cervical length was a better predictor of preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with history-indicated compared to those with ultrasound-indicated cerclage, although both showed clinical utility (AUC, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1.00) vs 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.91); P = 0.01). Quantitative fFN was a strong predictor of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with history-indicated cerclage (AUC, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-1.00)) and retained clinical utility in those with ultrasound-indicated cerclage (AUC, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.89)). There were no spontaneous deliveries before 34 weeks in women with a transabdominal cerclage, so AUC was not calculated. Delivery was delayed significantly in this group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical length and quantitative fFN retain clinical utility for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with cervical cerclage, and prediction is best in women with a history-indicated stitch. These tests can be relied upon to discriminate risk and have utility when planning clinical management with regard to treatment failure. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes of History-Indicated and Ultrasound-Indicated Cervical Cerclage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Cervical cerclage is the procedure of choice for preventing preterm delivery due to cervical insufficiency. The indication for its application may be based on the woman's reproductive history, findings at ultrasound, or clinical findings on vaginal examination. Pregnancy outcomes from these indications are variable according to the available literature. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and reproductive outcomes (miscarriage, preterm birth rates, and birth weights) of McDonald's cervical cerclage after history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in pregnant women. Methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted at Life International Hospital Awka, Nigeria and Life Specialist Hospital Nnewi, Nigeria. Pregnant women, who had a McDonald's cervical cerclage performed due to either history or ultrasound indication between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, were included in the study. Women with multiple pregnancies and those with physical examination-indicated or emergency cerclages were excluded. The main outcome measures included the prevalence of cervical cerclage, miscarriage, and preterm delivery rates. Outcomes were compared between groups with the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t test. p value of < 0.5 was set as significant value. Results: Overall, during the study period, 5392 deliveries occurred in the study sites, of which 103 women had a history-indicated or ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. This resulted in a 1.91% prevalence rate for history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Of these, 68 (66%) had history indicated, while 35 (34%) had ultrasound-indicated cerclage. There was no difference in the sociodemographic characteristics of both groups. Both groups had similar miscarriage rates: 1.18 in 1000 and 1.04 in 1000 deliveries, respectively (RR 1.160, 95% CI: 0.3824 to 3.5186, p = 0.793). There was more preterm delivery in history-indicated cerclage than ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage (26.50% vs. 17.10%; p = 0.292), though the difference was not statistically significant. The ultrasound group had a higher average birthweight than the history group (2.67 ± 0.99 vs. 2.53 ± 0.74). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The effectiveness and reproductive outcomes (miscarriage, preterm birth rates, and birth weights) of pregnant women with cervical cerclage due to history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage appear similar. When needed, cervical cerclage should be freely applied for cervical insufficiency, irrespective of the type of indication.

The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. RESULTS: There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). CONCLUSION: Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor.

Cervical cerclage training: Development and assessment of a simulator.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is a mainstay intervention for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk women. Simulation training facilitates high-level skill transfer in a low-consequence environment, and is being integrated into obstetrics and gynecology training. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a simulator for cervical cerclage, determine its validity as a simulator, and identify parameters suitable as proxy markers for performance. STUDY DESIGN: The 3 aims of this study were achieved, namely: (1) simulator design by obstetricians and a commercial company; (2) survey of obstetricians and gynecologists across a variety of training stages to determine need for and opinion of the simulator; and (3) comparison of novice and expert groups across a variety of proxy markers for successful cerclage insertion. RESULTS: Obstetricians and gynecologists found the simulator to be similar to clinical scenarios and suitable for skill training. Novice participants stated that the use of the simulator improved their confidence (P=.016). In a comparison between 6 expert and 8 novice surgeons, there seemed to be variations across multiple measurements of cerclage placement. CONCLUSION: Simulation is an increasingly prominent training modality for surgical skills. The simulator described herein was considered suitable for training by obstetricians and gynecologists. Further work should focus on the validations of proxy markers of successful insertion, longitudinal assessment of trainees, and correlation of training outcomes with clinical outcomes.

Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies: a retrospective case-control study matched by cervical length.

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancies with a progressively shortening cervix in the midterm pregnancy have an increasing risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Currently, there is no known effective method to prevent preterm birth among those women, and the use of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate whether a combination of ultrasound-indicated cerclage, indomethacin, and antibiotics in twin pregnancies between 18 and 26 weeks' gestation could extend the pregnancy, reduce the risk for spontaneous preterm birth, and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The ultrasound-indicated cerclage group included twin pregnancies with a transvaginal cervical length <25 mm that underwent cerclage at 18 to 26 weeks of gestation in the Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from December 2015 through August 2021. Twin pregnancies in our study that underwent cerclage also received antibiotics and indomethacin. A control group of twin pregnancies that were managed expectantly were matched with the treatment group in terms of transvaginal cervical length at diagnosis (±3 mm), gestational age at presentation of diagnosis (±3 weeks), and maternal age (±5 years). An additional subanalysis was performed in which the patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on transvaginal cervical length of either <15 mm or between 15 and 24 mm. The primary outcome was gestational age at delivery. The secondary outcomes were pregnancy latency, the rate of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <32, <34, <36 weeks' gestation, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 90 twin pregnancies with a transvaginal cervical length <25 mm were managed with either a cerclage (ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, n=45) or expectantly (control group, n=45). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. When compared with the control group, the gestational age at delivery was significantly higher (33.11±3.16 vs 30.22±4.12 weeks; P=.001) and the pregnancy latency was significantly longer (72.40±22.51 vs 45.56±28.82 days; P<.001) in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group. The rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <32, <34, and <36 weeks' gestation were significantly lower in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group than in the control group. In terms of neonatal outcomes, there were significant reductions in the overall perinatal mortality (4.4% vs 20.0%; P<.001), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (69.0% vs 92.6%; P<.001), and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (43.7% vs 64.7%; P=.010) for the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group when compared with the control group. In the subgroup of women with a transvaginal cervical length of between 15 and 24 mm (with 21 in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group vs 21 controls), the data were adjusted for maternal age, pregestational body mass index, in vitro fertilization, operative hysteroscopy, previous cervical surgery, previous spontaneous preterm birth, white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein level, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and the shortest transvaginal cervical length measured at diagnosis. In ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, gestational age at delivery was significantly higher (32.95±3.81 vs 30.24±4.01 weeks; beta, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-6.55; P=.042), pregnancy latency was significantly prolonged (77.19±24.81 vs 48.52±29.67 days; beta, 33.81; 95% confidence interval, 12.29-55.34; P=.003), and the rates of spontaneous preterm birth <36 weeks' gestation (57.1% vs 95.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.69; P=.029) was significantly decreased, and for neonatal outcomes, there were significant reductions in neonatal intensive care unit admissions (53.7% vs 96.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.32; P=.003) and the composite adverse neonatal outcomes (39.0% vs 73.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.68; P=.008) in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group when compared with the control group. In the subgroup of women with a transvaginal cervical length <15 mm, gestational age at delivery was higher (33.25±2.52 vs 30.00±4.33 weeks; beta, 3.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-6.42; P=.002), pregnancy latency was significantly prolonged (68.21±19.85 vs 42.96±28.43 days; beta, 30.11; 95% confidence interval, 12.42-47.81; P=.001), rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <32 weeks (16.7% vs 54.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.61; P=.020) and <34 weeks (54.2% vs 83.3%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.66; P=.019) of gestation was significantly decreased, and neonatal birthweight was significantly increased (2023.96±510.35 vs 1421.77±611.40 g; beta, 702.40; 95% confidence interval, 297.02-1107.78; P=.001) in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group when compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Cerclage among women with twin pregnancies with a transvaginal cervical length <25 mm may reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm birth and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes when compared with expectant management. It is worth noting that even with a short transvaginal cervical length of 15 to 24 mm, cerclage will significantly decrease the risk of delivery at <36 weeks' gestation and prolong pregnancy latency. Among women with a short transvaginal cervical length <15 mm, cerclage will significantly decrease the risk of delivery at <32 and <34 weeks' gestation and prolong pregnancy latency.

Median effective dose of ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage in Chinese women: a dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: Although intrathecal ropivacaine has been widely used for caesarean delivery, there are limited data for the use of ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage. We sought to determine the median effective dose of intrathecal ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage in 50% of patients (ED50) and the calculated dose required for successful block in 95% of patients (ED95). METHODS: We included Chinese women scheduled for prophylactic cervical cerclage under combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in the first or second trimester. A predetermined dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine was administered. If this determined dose achieved an effective block at a level not lower than T12, the next dose was decreased by 0.5 mg. Otherwise, the next dose was increased by 0.5 mg. The primary outcome was the ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine. Secondary outcomes included the calculated ED95, time from CSE to the start of surgery and so on. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study, 23 (57.5%) of 40 received an effective block only with intrathecal ropivacaine, while 17 (42.5%) patients needed extra epidural lidocaine to achieve a successful block. The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine confirmed by isotonic regression was 6.9 mg (95% CI, 6.68 to 7.12 mg), and the calculated ED95 was 7.8 mg (95% CI, 7.69 to 10.05 mg). When an effective block was achieved with intrathecal ropivacaine alone, the time to resolution of the sensory and motor blocks was 90 (75-100) min and 90 (60-100) min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage was 6.9 mg. Intrathecal ropivacaine (7.8 mg) is likely to produce successful anaesthesia in 95% of patients undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100051418.

Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB), defined as birth prior to 37 weeks of gestation, occurs in ten percent of all pregnancies. PTB is responsible for more than half of neonatal and infant mortalities and morbidities. Because cervical insufficiency is a common cause of PTB, one possible preventive strategy involves insertion of a cervical pessary to support the cervix. Several published studies have compared the use of pessary with different management options and obtained questionable results. This highlights the need for an up-to-date systematic review of the evidence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and risk factors for cervical insufficiency compared to no treatment, vaginal progesterone, cervical cerclage or bedrest. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 22 September 2021. We also searched the reference lists of included studies for additional records. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cervical pessary with no treatment, vaginal progesterone, cervical cerclage or bedrest for preventing PTB. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. Our primary outcome was delivery before 34 weeks' gestation. Our secondary outcomes were 1. delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, 2. maternal mortality, 3. maternal infection or inflammation, 4. preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, 5. harm to woman from the intervention, 6. maternal medications, 7. discontinuation of the intervention, 8. maternal satisfaction, 9. neonatal/paediatric care unit admission, 10. fetal/infant mortality, 11. neonatal sepsis, 12. gestational age at birth, 13. harm to offspring from the intervention 14. birthweight, 15. early neurodevelopmental morbidity, 15. late neurodevelopmental morbidity, 16. gastrointestinal morbidity and 17. respiratory morbidity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and risk of bias, evaluated trustworthiness based on criteria developed by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Review Group, extracted data, checked for accuracy and assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs (2983 participants). We included five RCTs (1830 women) in the comparison cervical pessary versus no treatment, three RCTs (1126 pregnant women) in the comparison cervical pessary versus vaginal progesterone, and one study (13 participants) in the comparison cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage. Overall, the certainty of evidence was low to moderate due to inconsistency (statistical heterogeneity), imprecision (few events and wide 95% confidence intervals (CIs) consistent with possible benefit and harm), and risk of performance and detection bias. Cervical pessary versus no treatment Cervical pessary compared with no treatment may reduce the risk of delivery before 34 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.55; 5 studies, 1830 women; low-certainty evidence) or before 37 weeks (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.05; 5 studies, 1830 women; low-certainty evidence). However, these results should be viewed with caution because the 95% CIs cross the line of no effect. Cervical pessary compared with no treatment probably has little or no effect on the risk of maternal infection or inflammation (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.26; 2 studies, 1032 women; moderate-certainty evidence). It is unclear if cervical pessary compared with no treatment has an effect on neonatal/paediatric care unit admission (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.59; 3 studies, 1332 infants; low-certainty evidence) or fetal/neonatal mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.48; 5 studies, 1830 infants; low-certainty evidence) because the 95% CIs are compatible with a wide range of effects that encompass both appreciable benefit and harm. Cervical pessary versus vaginal progesterone Cervical pessary may reduce the risk of delivery before 34 weeks (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.02; 3 studies, 1126 women; moderate-certainty evidence) or before 37 weeks (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.09; 3 studies, 1126 women; moderate-certainty evidence), but we are uncertain of the results because the 95% CI crosses the line of no effect. The intervention probably has little or no effect on maternal infection or inflammation (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; 2 studies, 265 women; moderate-certainty evidence). It is unclear if cervical pessary compared with vaginal progesterone has an effect on the risk of neonatal/paediatric care unit admission (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.98; low-certainty evidence) or fetal/neonatal mortality (RR 1.97, 95% CI 0.50 to 7.70; 2 studies; 265 infants; low-certainty evidence) because the 95% CIs are compatible with a wide range of effects that encompass both appreciable benefit and harm. Cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage Only one very small study of 13 pregnant women contributed data to this comparison; the results were unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In women with a singleton pregnancy, cervical pessary compared with no treatment or vaginal progesterone may reduce the risk of delivery before 34 weeks or 37 weeks, although these results should be viewed with caution due to uncertainty around the effect estimates. There is insufficient evidence with regard to the effect of cervical pessary compared with cervical cerclage on PTB. Due to low certainty-evidence in many of the prespecified outcomes and non-reporting of several other outcomes of interest for this review, there is a need for further robust RCTs that use standardised terminology for maternal and offspring outcomes. Future trials should take place in a range of settings to improve generalisability of the evidence. Further research should concentrate on comparisons of cervical pessary versus cervical cerclage and bed rest. Investigation of different phenotypes of PTB may be relevant.

Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage in Twin Pregnancies: A Cohort Study.

Background: To report the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in patients with twin pregnancies who underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) and to compare them to patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing the same procedures. Methods: Patients who underwent UIC between January 2010 and December 2020 at Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital were reviewed. We compared characteristics, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes between patients with singleton and twin pregnancies. Results: A total of 94 women (56 singleton and 38 twin pregnancies) underwent UIC were included. The mean gestational age (GA) at cerclage and preoperative cervical length (CL) were not significantly different. Twin pregnancies were more likely to deliver at earlier median gestations than singletons (singleton, 36 + 1 weeks vs twin, 32 + 6 weeks, and p = 0.004). The frequency of preterm delivery <34 weeks in twin group was higher than in singleton group (15 (26.8%) vs 20 (52.6%) and p =0.016). However, the frequency of preterm delivery <32, <28, and <24 weeks was not significantly different between two groups. Although neonatal weights in singleton pregnancies were heavier than twin pregnancies, neonatal mortality and morbidities were not significantly different between two groups. Among various factors contributing to preterm birth, preoperative CL ≤ 15 mm was independently associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks. Furthermore, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with cervical length ≤ 15 mm are comparable with those of singleton pregnancies (GA at delivery, singleton, 35 + 1 weeks vs twin, 32 + 5 weeks, and p = 0.24; neonatal mortality, singleton, 3.4% vs twin, 4.8%, and p = 0.64). Conclusion: The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of UIC in twin pregnancies were comparable to those in singleton pregnancies, especially when CL is ≤15 mm. UIC might be considered a safe procedure for twin pregnancies.