Brazil is hoping and waiting for a new vaccine as dengue rages.

A locally produced vaccine did well in a phase 3 clinical trial but won't be available until at least 2025.

Machine Learning Predicts Oxaliplatin Benefit in Early Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: A combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard for adjuvant therapy of resected early-stage colon cancer (CC). Oxaliplatin leads to lasting and disabling neurotoxicity. Reserving the regimen for patients who benefit from oxaliplatin would maximize efficacy and minimize unnecessary adverse side effects. METHODS: We trained a new machine learning model, referred to as the colon oxaliplatin signature (COLOXIS) model, for predicting response to oxaliplatin-containing regimens. We examined whether COLOXIS was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting among 1,065 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FULV; n = 421) or FULV + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 644) from NSABP C-07 and C-08 phase III trials. The COLOXIS model dichotomizes patients into COLOXIS+ (oxaliplatin responder) and COLOXIS- (nonresponder) groups. Eight-year recurrence-free survival was used to evaluate oxaliplatin benefits within each of the groups, and the predictive value of the COLOXIS model was assessed using the P value associated with the interaction term (int P) between the model prediction and the treatment effect. RESULTS: Among 1,065 patients, 526 were predicted as COLOXIS+ and 539 as COLOXIS-. The COLOXIS+ prediction was associated with prognosis for FULV-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.15]; P = .017). The model was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits: COLOXIS+ patients benefited from oxaliplatin (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89]; P = .0065; int P = .03), but COLOXIS- patients did not (COLOXIS- HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.52]; P = .65). CONCLUSION: The COLOXIS model is predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting. The results provide evidence supporting a change in CC adjuvant therapy: reserve oxaliplatin only for COLOXIS+ patients, but further investigation is warranted.

Implementing a contextually appropriate foot-ankle exercise programme in primary care for the prevention of modifiable risk factors for ulcers in people with diabetes: protocol for a hybrid type 2 study.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is a highly prevalent disease that negatively impacts people's health and quality of life. It can result in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and foot complications, which in turn lead to ulcers and amputations. The international guidelines on diabetic foot included specific foot-ankle exercises as preventive strategy capable of modifying the risk factors for ulcers. Our aim is to test the effectiveness and to implement a contextually appropriate preventive intervention-a foot-ankle exercises programme alongside educational strategies-in a primary care setting to improve range of motion (ROM), strength, functionality of foot-ankle, and quality of life in people with diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study organised in four phases, being undertaken in Limeira, São Paulo. Phase 1, preimplementation, aims to gather information about the contextual characteristics, barriers, and facilitators and to form the implementation team. In phase 2, the implementation team will structure the foot-ankle programme, adapting it to the context of primary healthcare, and develop the training for health professionals. In phase 3, effectiveness of the 12 week group-based intervention will be tested by a cluster randomised controlled trial. Primary care units (18 clusters) will be randomly allocated to a control or intervention group, with a total sample of 356 people. Primary outcomes will be DPN symptoms and ankle and first metatarsal phalangeal joint ROM. Reach, adoption, and implementation will be evaluated by Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. In phase 4, maintenance and expansion of the programme in the municipality will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and the informed consent to be signed by the participants were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (CAAE:63457822.0.0000.0068, 29 November 2022). The project will generate and share data in a public repository. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and electronic communications for health professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05639478.

Novedades en el calendario de vacunas de Argentina. Primera parte: virus sincicial respiratorio / News in Argentina's vaccine schedule. Part one: respiratory syncytial virus

A fines de 2023 la autoridad sanitaria de Argentina realizó modificaciones en el Calendario Nacional obligatorio, que serán implementadas en forma progresiva durante 2024. Este artículo está enfocado en la introducción de la vacuna contra el virus sincicial respiratorio en las personas embarazadas que cursan las semanas 32 a 36 de gestación durante la temporada de circulación del virus. (AU)

At the end of 2023, the Argentine health authority modified the mandatory National Calendar, which will be implemented progressively during 2024. This article focuses on the introduction of the vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus in pregnant women in the 32nd to 36th weeks of gestation during the season of the virus's circulation. (AU)

Novedades en el calendario de vacunas de Argentina. Tercera parte: neumococo / News in Argentina's vaccine schedule. Third part: pneumococcus

A fines de 2023 la autoridad sanitaria de Argentina realizó modificaciones en el Calendario Nacional obligatorio, que serán implementadas en forma progresiva durante 2024. Este artículo está enfocado en el reemplazo progresivo de las vacunas antineumocóccicas conjugada de 13 serotipos y polisacárida no conjugada de 23 serotipos por la vacuna conjugada de 20 serotipos. (AU)

At the end of 2023, the Argentine health authority modified the mandatory National Calendar, which will be implemented progressively during 2024. This article focuses on the progressive replacement of the 13-serotype pneumococcal conjugate and the 23-serotype polysaccharide vaccines by the 20-serotype conjugate vaccine. (AU)

Comparison of clinical outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if participation in a cancer clinical trial confers clinical benefits to patients. There is not enough scientific evidence in this regard and the available publications are scarce and provide ambiguous and limited information. OBJECTIVE: Compare overall and progression-free survival and response to treatment among those who met the eligibility criteria and accepted to participate and those who refused to participate in cancer clinical trials. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component was carried out, which included patients diagnosed with cancer who participated in phase III clinical trials and patients who, being eligible, refused to participate. The patients were cared for at the National Institute of Cancerology in Colombia between 2019 and 2022. Analysis of differences in proportions and means of sociodemographic and clinical variables was included; overall survival and progression-free survival time were described and the survival curves between groups were compared. Variables related to survival were determined using a Cox regression model and Hazard Ratios were calculated. RESULTS: 62 women and 50 men were included. In the women group, we found a statistical association between clinical trial participation and non-serious events adverse and progression. The stable disease and complete response were higher in participants than in refusers. The median progression-free survival for refusers was 7,4 m meantime for participants the median was not reached and 74,1% remained without progression at 28 months. In the men group, we also found a statistical association between clinical trial participation and the occurrence of non-serious events adverse meanwhile there were no significant differences in overall response, progression, and death, even though the proportion of progression was minor in participants 20% vs. refusers 26% respectively. The median survival was not reached for any group, even though in the participants group 55,2% were still alive at month 20 and in the refusers group still alive at 56,8% at month 45. Covariables included for the multivariate Cox regression only age had a statistical association with overall survival in the women's group and the men group any covariables reached statistical association. CONCLUSION: It can be considered that participation in clinical trials could give participants a better response to treatment, without increasing the probability of death and with the probability of decreasing the progression of the disease. Participation in trials could improve the outcomes of clinical response rates, no change in overall survival, and progression-free.

Moving beyond single-agent checkpoint inhibition in biliary tract cancers: what is the next frontier?

Background: Immunotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with cancer. Biliary tract cancers are a group of lethal diseases, and immunotherapy is an exciting new strategy to treat patients in advanced stages. Role of immunotherapy in biliary cancers: Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, is a new immunotherapy option for patients with advanced biliary cancers. In a randomized phase III trial, the combination of durvalumab and chemotherapy improved disease outcomes, including overall survival, in patients with advanced biliary cancers regardless of PD-L1 expression. Future perspective: Promising new combinations with new and potent antibodies or antiangiogenics are under development. Combinations with new immunotherapy agents targeting CTLA-4 or OX40 can enhance T-cell activation and improve outcomes compared with single anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Furthermore, ctDNA is being used as an alternative to tissue genomic analysis and can be used to identify actionable targets. In this review, we will discuss the most important studies involving immunotherapy in biliary cancers as well as future perspectives in the field.

New treatment strategies for advanced biliary cancers with chemoimmunotherapy combinations have been shown to lead to better tumor responses and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. The combination of durvalumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine may become a new standard of care for advanced disease despite the modest improvement in median overall survival of less than 2 months. Promising combinations with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies or antiangiogenics are underway with the objective of improvement in survival. Although multiple combinations are available with the potential to establish a new standard of care, concerns regarding toxicities should also be evaluated. In this review, we will discuss the most important studies involving immunotherapy in biliary cancers as well as future perspectives in the field.

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing antiretroviral therapy for treatment-experienced HIV adult patients using an optimized background therapy approach: is there evidence enough for a standardized third-line strategy?

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the need for evidence on third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for adults living with HIV/AIDS, given that some controversy remains as to the best combinations of ART for experienced HIV-1-infected patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to (i) assess the efficacy of third-line therapy for adults with HIV/AIDS based on randomized controlled trials (RCT) that adopted the "new antiretroviral (ARV) + optimized background therapy (OBT)" approach and (ii) address the key issues identified in WHO's guidelines on the use of third-line therapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for RCTs assessing third-line ARV therapy that used an OBT approach between 1966 and 2015. Data was extracted using an Excel-structured datasheet based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) recommendations. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was the proportion of patients reaching undetectable HIV RNA levels (< 50 copies/mL) at 48 weeks of follow-up. Included studies were evaluated using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias assessment tool. Summarized evidence was rated according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Eighteen trials assessing 9 new ARV + OBT combinations defined as third-line HIV therapy provided the efficacy data: 7 phase IIb trials and 11 phase III trials. Four of the 18 trials provided extension data, thus resulting in 14 trials providing 48-week efficacy data. In the meta-analysis, considering the outcome regarding the proportion of patients with a viral load below 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks, 9 out of 14 trials demonstrated the superiority of the new combination being studied (risk difference = 0.18, 95% CI 0.13-0.23). The same analysis stratified by the number of fully active ARVs demonstrated a risk difference of 0.29 (95% CI 0.12-0.46), 0.28 (95% CI 0.17-0.38) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.10-0.24) respectively from zero, one, and two or more active drugs strata. Nine of the 18 trials were considered to have a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy results demonstrated that the groups of HIV-experienced patients receiving the new ARV + OBT were more likely to achieve viral suppression when compared to the control groups. However, most of these trials may be at a high risk of bias. Thus, there is still not enough evidence to stipulate which combinations are the most effective for therapeutic regimens that are to be used sequentially due to documented multi-resistance.

Bounded-width confidence interval following optimal sequential analysis of adverse events with binary data.

In sequential testing with binary data, sample size and time to detect a signal are the key performance measures to optimize. While the former should be optimized in Phase III clinical trials, minimizing the latter is of major importance in post-market drug and vaccine safety surveillance of adverse events. The precision of the relative risk estimator on termination of the analysis is a meaningful design criterion as well. This paper presents a linear programming framework to find the optimal alpha spending that minimizes expected time to signal, or expected sample size as needed. The solution enables (a) to bound the width of the confidence interval following the end of the analysis, (b) designs with outer signaling thresholds and inner non-signaling thresholds, and (c) sequential designs with variable Bernoulli probabilities. To illustrate, we use real data on the monitoring of adverse events following the H1N1 vaccination. The numerical results are obtained using the R Sequential package.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: what have we learned?

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor, remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their role in glioblastoma is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To review the state of immunotherapies in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on recently published ICPi clinical trials. METHODS: In this editorial/opinion article, we critically review results of the first generation of trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in glioblastoma, as well as future directions. RESULTS: Expression of PD-L1 is frequent in glioblastoma, ranging from 60-70% of patients. Phase 1 studies of nivolumab with and without ipilimumab, as well as pembrolizumab, showed no new safety concerns in brain tumors, and no neurotoxicity. However, randomized phase 3 trials of nivolumab showed no survival improvements over bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma; no role in newly diagnosed disease as a replacement for temozolomide in unmethylated MGMT promoter tumors; and no benefit as an addition to temozolomide in methylated MGMT tumors. However, studies examining post treatment tumor samples have shown signs of increased immunologic response, and occasional long lasting radiographic responses have been seen. A small study of pembrolizumab suggested a potential role as a "neoadjuvant" treatment in resectable recurrent glioblastoma, while other studies are investigating selection of patients with higher mutational burden and novel agents and combinatorial strategies. CONCLUSION: Despite initial negative trials, immunotherapy remains of high interest in glioblastoma, and many trials are still ongoing. Improving our mechanistic understanding of the immunosuppression and T cell dysfunction induced by both tumor and the CNS microenvironment remains however crucial for the development of successful immunotherapeutic approaches in this disease.

Evaluation of Provider Preferences in First-Line Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison Between Dual Immunotherapy vs. Immunotherapy/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Dual immunotherapy (ipilimumab/nivolumab, IO/IO) and immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) combinations (e.g. pembrolizumab/axitinib) are approved for the first-line treatment of intermediate/poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but there is limited comparative data between these two options. We sought to understand how oncologists decide between IO/IO vs. IO/TKI. METHODS: We sent a 10-question electronic survey centered on a patient scenario of intermediate/poor risk metastatic RCC to 294 academic/disease-focused and general oncologists in the US. RESULTS: We received 105 responses (36% response rate): 61% (64) of providers chose IO/IO, 39% (41) chose IO/TKI. 78% (82) of oncologists were academic or disease-focused, 22% (23) were general. Academic/disease-focused oncologists were significantly more likely to choose IO/IO (56/82, 68%) than general oncologists (8/23, 35%), P = .004. Among those who chose IO/IO, the perceived main issue with IO/TKI was: long-term toxicities - 31% (20), short-term toxicities - 28% (18), less effective - 28% (18), less convenient - 8% (5). Among those who chose IO/TKI, the perceived main issue with IO/IO was: short-term toxicities - 43% (17), less effective - 28% (11), long-term toxicities - 15% (6), and risk of death - 10% (4). 88% (92) of providers would be comfortable enrolling patients into a phase III trial comparing IO/IO vs. IO/TKI. We found no associations between therapy chosen by a provider and participation as PI in a trial of IO/IO or IO/TKI, or receipt of outside funding from an IO/IO or IO/TKI company. CONCLUSION: In response to a patient scenario of intermediate/poor risk metastatic RCC, 61% of providers chose IO/IO, 39% chose IO/TKI. There was a significant association between type of practice and choice of therapy, with academic/disease-focused oncologists more likely to choose IO/IO. The majority of oncologists would be comfortable enrolling patients into a phase III trial comparing IO/IO vs. IO/TKI.

La aprobación de CoronaVac en Brasil y Chile: algunas lecciones sobre los retos regulatorios de vacunas

[RESUMEN]. Este análisis compara y sistematiza algunos hitos de la aprobación en Brasil y Chile de la vacuna CoronaVac del laboratorio chino Sinovac, desde diciembre 2020 hasta octubre 2021, respecto de cómo se fundamentó su eficacia e inmunogenicidad. A tal fin se realizó un análisis exhaustivo de la documentación oficial pública sobre la aprobación de la vacuna en ambos países; asimismo, se consideraron artículos técnicos pertinentes sobre la materia, y la divulgación y discusión realizada en los medios de comunicación. En uno y otro caso se expresó nítidamente una puja de una amplia gama de actores privados y públicos en torno a la medición y difusión de las cifras de eficacia. Esto permite visualizar los sendos retos que enfrentan y enfrentarán los países de medianos ingresos para certificar la calidad de productos en una era epidemiológica pandémica, y la necesidad de fortalecer institucionalmente las autoridades regulatorias, para viabilizar una evaluación proba y certera de la calidad de las vacunas, en cuanto a su seguridad y eficiencia.

[ABSTRACT]. This analysis compares and systematizes some of the milestones (between December 2020 and October 2021) in the approval by Brazil and Chile of the CoronaVac vaccine made by the Chinese laboratory Sinovac, with regard to how the efficacy and immunogenicity of the vaccine was determined. To this end, a compre- hensive analysis was conducted of official public documentation of the vaccine's approval in both countries; likewise, relevant technical articles on the subject, as well as dissemination and discussion in the media were considered. In both cases, a wide range of private and public actors expressed clearly competing interests in the measurement and dissemination of figures on the vaccine's efficacy. This reveals the challenges that middle-income countries face—and will continue to face—when certifying the quality of products in a pande- mic period, and the need to institutionally strengthen regulatory authorities to ensure a sound and accurate evaluation of vaccine quality, in terms of safety and efficiency.

[RESUMO]. Esta análise compara e sistematiza alguns marcos da aprovação, no Brasil e no Chile, da vacina Corona- Vac, do laboratório chinês Sinovac, de dezembro de 2020 a outubro de 2021, especificamente sobre como sua eficácia e imunogenicidade foram fundamentadas. Para tanto, foi realizada uma análise exaustiva da documentação pública oficial sobre a aprovação da vacina em ambos os países. Da mesma forma, foram considerados artigos técnicos pertinentes sobre o assunto, e divulgações e discussões realizadas na mídia. Em ambos os casos, uma disputa de interesses de uma ampla gama de atores privados e públicos em torno da medição e divulgação dos números referentes à eficácia foi claramente expressa. Isso permite visualizar os enormes desafios que os países de renda média enfrentam e enfrentarão para certificar a qualidade dos produtos em um contexto epidemiológico de pandemia e a necessidade de fortalecer institucionalmente as autoridades reguladoras para viabilizar uma avaliação íntegra e acertada da qualidade das vacinas em relação a sua segurança e eficiência.

Antivirals for adult patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A randomized, Phase II/III, multicenter, placebo-controlled, adaptive study, with multiple arms and stages. COALITION COVID-19 BRAZIL IX - REVOLUTIOn: protocol and statistical analysis plan. / Antivirais para pacientes adultos hospitalizados com infecção por SARS-CoV-2: Um estudo de Fase II/III, randomizado, multicêntrico, controlado por placebo, adaptativo, com múltiplos braços e estágios. COALITION COVID-19 BRAZIL IX - REVOLUTIOn: protocolo e plano de análise estatística.

Repurposed drugs are important in resource-limited settings because the interventions are more rapidly available, have already been tested safely in other populations and are inexpensive. Repurposed drugs are an effective solution, especially for emerging diseases such as COVID-19. The REVOLUTIOn trial has the objective of evaluating three repurposed antiviral drugs, atazanavir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir, already used for HIV- and hepatitis C virus-infected patients in a randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive, multiarm, multistage study. The drugs will be tested simultaneously in a Phase II trial to first identify whether any of these drugs alone or in combination reduce the viral load. If they do, a Phase III trial will be initiated to investigate if these medications are capable of increasing the number of days free respiratory support. Participants must be hospitalized adults aged ≥ 18 years with initiation of symptoms ≤ 9 days and SpO2 ≤ 94% in room air or a need for supplemental oxygen to maintain an SpO2 > 94%. The expected total sample size ranges from 252 to 1,005 participants, depending on the number of stages that will be completed in the study. Hence, the protocol is described here in detail together with the statistical analysis plan. In conclusion, the REVOLUTIOn trial is designed to provide evidence on whether atazanavir, daclatasvir or sofosbuvir decrease the SARS-CoV-2 load in patients with COVID-19 and increase the number of days patients are free of respiratory support. In this protocol paper, we describe the rationale, design, and status of the trial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04468087.

Os medicamentos reaproveitados são importantes em contextos de recursos limitados porque as intervenções estão mais rapidamente disponíveis, já foram testadas com segurança em outras populações e são, em geral, mais baratas. Os medicamentos reaproveitados são uma solução eficaz, especialmente para doenças emergentes, como a COVID-19. O estudo REVOLUTIOn visa avaliar três medicamentos antivirais reaproveitados: atazanavir, daclatasvir e sofosbuvir, já utilizados em pacientes infectados pelo HIV ou pelo vírus da hepatite C, em um estudo randomizado, controlado por placebo, adaptativo, multibraço e em múltiplos estágios. Os medicamentos serão testados simultaneamente em um ensaio de Fase II para primeiro identificar se algum deles, isoladamente ou em combinação, reduz a carga viral. Se reduzirem, será iniciado um estudo de Fase III para investigar se tais medicamentos são capazes de aumentar o número de dias sem suporte respiratório. Os participantes devem ser adultos hospitalizados com idade ≥ 18 anos com início dos sintomas ≤ 9 dias e saturação de oxigênio ≤ 94% em ar ambiente ou necessidade de oxigênio suplementar para manter saturação de oxigênio > 94%. O tamanho total esperado da amostra varia entre 252 e 1.005 participantes, dependendo do número de estágios que serão concluídos no estudo. Assim, o protocolo é aqui descrito em detalhes, juntamente do plano de análise estatística. Em conclusão, o estudo REVOLUTIOn foi concebido para fornecer evidências se o atazanavir, o daclatasvir ou o sofosbuvir reduzem a carga viral de SARS-CoV-2 em pacientes com COVID-19 e aumentam o número de dias em que os pacientes ficam sem suporte respiratório. Neste artigo de protocolo, descrevem-se a fundamentação, o desenho e a situação do ensaio. Identificador do ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04468087.

BMI and Treatment Response in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is increasingly prevalent in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but is associated with improved survival, creating an "obesity paradox" in PAH. It is unknown if the improved outcomes could be attributable to obese patients deriving a greater benefit from PAH therapies. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does BMI modify treatment effectiveness in PAH? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using individual participant data, a meta-analysis was conducted of phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of treatments for PAH submitted for approval to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from 2000 to 2015. Primary outcomes were change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and World Health Organization (WHO) functional class. RESULTS: A total of 5,440 participants from 17 trials were included. Patients with overweight and obesity had lower baseline 6MWD and were more likely to be WHO functional class III or IV. Treatment was associated with a 27.01-m increase in 6MWD (95% CI, 21.58-32.45; P < .001) and lower odds of worse WHO functional class (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.70; P < .001). For every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, 6MWD was reduced by 0.66 m (P = .07); there was no significant effect modification of treatment response in 6MWD according to BMI (P for interaction = .34). Higher BMI was not associated with odds of WHO functional class at end of follow-up; however, higher BMI attenuated the treatment response such that every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI increased odds of worse WHO functional class by 3% (OR, 1.03; P for interaction = .06). INTERPRETATION: Patients with overweight and obesity had lower baseline 6MWD and worse WHO functional class than patients with normal weight with PAH. Higher BMI did not modify the treatment response for change in 6MWD, but it attenuated the treatment response for WHO functional class. PAH trials should include participants representative of all weight groups to allow for assessment of treatment heterogeneity and mechanisms.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by acute optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM). NMO is caused by a pathogenic serum IgG antibody against the water channel aquoporin 4 (AQP4) in the majority of patients. AQP4-antibody (AQP4-ab) presence is highly specific, and differentiates NMO from multiple sclerosis. It binds to AQP4 channels on astrocytes, triggering activation of the classical complement cascade, causing granulocyte, eosinophil, and lymphocyte infiltration, culminating in injury first to astrocyte, then oligodendrocytes followed by demyelination and neuronal loss. NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has recently been defined and stratified based on AQP4-ab serology status. Most NMOSD patients experience severe relapses leading to permanent neurologic disability, making suppression of relapse frequency and severity, the primary objective in disease management. The most common treatments used for relapses are steroids and plasma exchange.Currently, long-term NMOSD relapse prevention includes off-label use of immunosuppressants, particularly rituximab. In the last 2 years however, three pivotal clinical trials have expanded the spectrum of drugs available for NMOSD patients. Phase III studies have shown significant relapse reduction compared to placebo in AQP4-ab-positive patients treated with satralizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibitor, inebilizumab, an antibody against CD19+ B cells; and eculizumab, an antibody blocking the C5 component of complement. In light of the new evidence on NMOSD pathophysiology and of preliminary results from ongoing trials with new drugs, we present this descriptive review, highlighting promising treatment modalities as well as auspicious preclinical and clinical studies.