Reflective practice of nurse residents in the teaching-learning process in teaching hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze reflective practice in the teaching-learning process of nurses in residency programs in teaching hospitals in Minas Gerais, Brazil. METHODS: Case study, based on the reflective practice framework, conducted in two teaching hospitals. Observation and interviews were conducted with first and second-year residents, and five participants were included for in-depth analysis, with their data subjected to frequency distribution analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. RESULTS: In 519 observed activities, elements of reflection were identified in 22.2%, especially active listening and expression of doubts. Discourses indicated practice as the best moment for teaching-learning due to its potential to generate reflections. Learning by doing and case discussion were considered potential strategies for reflective learning. CONCLUSION: Know-in-action reflection was evidenced as the predominant formative aspect for residents, with few opportunities for reflection on reflection-in-action.

Community perspectives on the use of electronic health data to support reflective practice by health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records and other clinical information systems have crucial roles in health service delivery and are often utilised for patient care as well as health promotion and research. Government agencies and healthcare bodies are gradually shifting the focus on how these data systems can be harnessed for secondary uses such as reflective practice, professional learning and continuing professional development. Whilst there has been a presence in research around the attitudes of health professionals in employing clinical information systems to support their reflective practice, there has been very little research into consumer attitudes towards these data systems and how they would like to interact with such structures. The study described in this article aimed to address this gap in the literature by exploring community perspectives on the secondary use of Electronic Health Data for health professional learning and practice reflection. METHODS: A qualitative methodology was used, with data being collected via semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted via phone and audio recordings, before being transcribed into text for analysis. Reflective thematic analysis was undertaken to analyse the data. RESULTS: Fifteen Australians consented to participate in an interview. Analysis of interview data generated five themes: (1) Knowledge about health professional registration and professional learning; (2) Secondary uses of Electronic Health Data; (3) Factors that enable the use of Electronic Health Data for health professional learning; (4) Challenges using Electronic Health Data for health professional learning and (5) Expectations around consent to use Electronic Health Data for health professional learning. CONCLUSIONS: Australians are generally supportive of health professionals using Electronic Health Data to support reflective practice and learning but identify several challenges for data being used in this way.

The Essentials of Debriefing and Reflective Practice.

Debriefing is a specific type of reflective learning. Debriefing follows an experience, with the goal of taking meaningful learning away from the experience. It is often used following a simulation-based educational experience but the same techniques can be used following actual clinical care. Early studies in simulation suggest that learning does not occur in simulation-based education in the absence of debriefing. There are phases of a debriefing discussion and specific conversational strategies that are used to engage learners and provoke engaging learning discussions. Standards of practice call for facilitators with specialized training and a debriefing method that is theory based.

Escucha activa

Invita a los jóvenes a practicar la escucha activa durante las conversaciones con amigos, familiares o compañeros. Pídeles que se centren completamente en lo que la otra persona está diciendo, sin interrumpir ni juzgar. Después de que la otra persona haya hablado, pueden reflexionar sobre lo que han escuchado antes de responder.

"You go in heavy and you come out light": An interpretative phenomenological analysis of reflective practice experiences in an Irish infant mental health setting.

Reflective practice (RP) is a core component of infant mental health (IMH); however, there is limited published empirical research on IMH practitioner experiences of RP. This two-stage, qualitative, multimodal study explored Irish IMH practitioners' experiences of RP spaces. Visual and verbal data from seven individual interviews and a participatory arts-based focus group with seven participants (eight participants in total, all white Irish females) were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Five group experiential themes (Just get on with it; What should I be bringing to this space?; Who are my "hands"?; Taking a step back; and You go in heavy and you come out light) were generated by the analysis. These were used to construct a developmental and experiential model of learning in an RP space. The themes portray how a practitioner's RP experience can change over time: influenced by prior experiences and practice development stage, practitioners move from initial uncertainty, anxiety, and perceived pressure in a busy workload to developing the trust and ability to be vulnerable in an RP space. Through relationships (supervisor/facilitator or group members), a shared safe space can be created, which addresses practitioners' needs for containment, allowing for experiential learning through a process of transformational moments.

La práctica con reflexión (RP) es un componente central de la salud mental infantil (IMH), sin embargo, existe una limitada investigación empírica publicada sobre las experiencias de RP de los profesionales de la práctica de IMH. Este estudio multimodal, cualitativo, en dos etapas, exploró las experiencias de los espacios de RP de profesionales irlandeses en la práctica de IMH. Se analizó la información visual y verbal de siete entrevistas individuales y un grupo de enfoque participativo con base artística de siete participantes (ocho participantes en total, todas mujeres blancas irlandesas) usando el Análisis Fenomenológico Interpretativo. El análisis generó cinco temas de la experiencia de grupo (Manos a la obra; ¿Qué debo aportar a este espacio?; ¿Quiénes son mis 'manos'?; Dar un paso atrás; y Se comienza pesado y se termina liviano). Estos temas se usaron para construir un modelo de desarrollo y experimental de aprendizaje dentro de un espacio de RP. Los temas describieron cómo la experiencia de RP de un profesional de la práctica puede cambiar a lo largo del tiempo: influida por experiencias previas y un estado de desarrollo práctico, los profesionales de la práctica pasan de la incertidumbre inicial, la ansiedad y la percibida presión dentro de una ocupada carga de trabajo a desarrollar la confianza y la habilidad de ser vulnerable dentro de un espacio de RP. A través de relaciones (supervisor/facilitador o miembros de grupo), se puede crear un espacio seguro compartido, el cual aborda las necesidades de contención de los profesionales de la práctica, permitiendo el aprendizaje experimental a través de un proceso de momentos transformacionales.

Storylines of family medicine V: ways of thinking-honing the therapeutic self.

Storylines of Family Medicine is a 12-part series of thematically linked essays with accompanying illustrations that explore the many dimensions of family medicine, as interpreted by individual family physicians and medical educators in the USA and elsewhere around the world. In 'V: ways of thinking-honing the therapeutic self', authors present the following sections: 'Reflective practice in action', 'The doctor as drug-Balint groups', 'Cultivating compassion', 'Towards a humanistic approach to doctoring', 'Intimacy in family medicine', 'The many faces of suffering', 'Transcending suffering' and 'The power of listening to stories.' May readers feel a deeper sense of their own therapeutic agency by reflecting on these essays.

Delphi and consensus in science: necessary reflections / Delphi e o consenso nas ciências: reflexões necessárias

A utilização da técnica Delphi como ferramenta para construção de consenso na ciência tem sido recorrente. Como explicam Linstone e Turoff, a técnica composta de uma série de questionários sequenciais, ou "rodadas" intercaladas por feedback controlado, que buscam obter o consenso mais confiável de opinião de um grupo, é útil para situações em que julgamentos individuais devem ser aproveitados e combinados. Os padrões de consenso geralmente envolvem o acordo de especialistas, profissionais, pacientes, cuidadores ou familiares sobre termos, padrões e recomendações na área da saúde.

Use of the Delphi technique for consensus-building in science has become trivial. As explained by Linstone & Turoff, this technique is composed of a series of sequentially administered questionnaires, or "rounds", with controlled feedback following each round; it aims to obtain the most reliable consensus of opinion of a group of experts and is useful for situations where individual judgments must be tapped and combined. In the field of health, consensus generally involves an agreement among specialists, providers, patients, and caregivers or family members regarding terms, standards, and recommendations.

Clinical Instruction in Nursing: A Leveraging Tool.

BACKGROUND: Clinical educators influence the preparation of nursing students for complex professional roles. Although classroom instruction is well-structured and guided by an array of frameworks, clinical instruction remains vague. This study explored components of effective clinical instruction and the support needs of clinical educators. METHOD: A qualitative multiple case study design was used to examine the teaching experiences of 14 clinical faculty and preceptors, guided by Danielson's teaching framework. RESULTS: When teaching domains of "planning" and "instruction" were emphasized, assessment of students' needs, behavioral management, and reflective practice were understated. Findings identified events and concepts deemed essential for effective clinical instruction, and participants' needs for ongoing support and guidance concurred with teaching gaps. CONCLUSION: This study attested to the complexity of clinical instruction, yet generated a clinical tool that may guide academia on designing professional programs to advance instruction in challenging clinical environments. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):163-170.].

Debriefing, a dialogical space for the development of reflective thinking in nursing.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the pedagogical elements necessary for the debriefing to favor the development of reflective thinking. METHOD: A single case study developed at the Centro de Simulación en Salud of the Escuela de Enfermería of the Universidad de Costa Rica in October 2018. Data were collected through interviews, observation and document analysis. For data analysis, the strategy of theoretical propositions and the construction of explanation technique were used. RESULTS: The data originated two categories: 1) pedagogy of the organization, addressed elements thought by the professor to facilitate the dialogue; 2) facilitation pedagogy, brought elements from the dialogue itself that enrich the discussion, mobilize the group, provoke reflection and engagement. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: It is essential to include the following as pedagogical elements in order to favor the development of reflective thinking: prior planning, adequate environment, systematization, pedagogical training in facilitating debriefing, openness to dialogue, pedagogical respect, valorization of positive aspects, patience, and motivation.

Further development of the reflective practice questionnaire.

Background: This article provides an update of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ). The original RPQ consisted of 40-items with 10-sub-scales. In this article, the RPQ is streamlined into a 10-item single reflective practice construct, and a 30-item extended version that includes additional sub-scales of confidence, uncertainty/stress, and work satisfaction. Methods: A total of 501 university students filled out an online questionnaire that contained the original Reflective Practice Questionnaire, and two general measures of reflection: The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale, and the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire. Results: Based on factor analysis, the RPQ was streamlined into a brief 10-item version, and an extended 30-item version. Small positive correlations were found between the RPQ reflective practice measure and the two measures of general reflection, providing discriminant validity evidence for the RPQ. The RPQ was found to be sensitive to differences among industries, whereas the general measures of reflection were not. Average reflective practice scores were higher for health and education industries compared to retail and food/accommodation industries.

Reflective questioning to guide socially just global health reform: a narrative review and expert elicitation.

Recent research has highlighted the impacts of colonialism and racism in global health, yet few studies have presented concrete steps toward addressing the problems. We conducted a narrative review to identify published evidence that documented guiding frameworks for enhancing equity and inclusion in global health research and practice (GHRP). Based on this narrative review, we developed a questionnaire with a series of reflection questions related on commonly reported challenges related to diversity, inclusion, equity, and power imbalances. To reach consensus on a set of priority questions relevant to each theme, the questionnaire was sent to a sample of 18 global health experts virtually and two rounds of iterations were conducted. Results identified eight thematic areas and 19 reflective questions that can assist global health researchers and practitioners striving to implement socially just global health reforms. Key elements identified for improving GHRP include: (1) aiming to understand the historical context and power dynamics within the areas touched by the program; (2) promoting and mobilizing local stakeholders and leadership and ensuring measures for their participation in decision-making; (3) ensuring that knowledge products are co-produced and more equitably accessible; (4) establishing a more holistic feedback and accountability system to understand needed reforms based on local perspectives; and (5) applying systems thinking to addressing challenges and encouraging approaches that can be sustained long-term. GHRP professionals should reflect more deeply on how their goals align with those of their in-country collaborators. The consistent application of reflective processes has the potential to shift GHRP towards increased equity.

Practicalities of promoting practice-based learning in end of life care for care home staff: Lessons from "online" supportive conversations and reflection sessions.

INTRODUCTION: Deaths in care homes and "at home" are anticipated to account for a third of UK deaths by 2040. Currently, palliative and end of life care are not part of statutory training in care homes. Reflective practice is a tool that can facilitate practice-based learning and support. Following a feasibly study to test "online" supportive conversations and reflection sessions (OSCaRS) to support care home staff in relation to death/dying during the first months of the COVID pandemic, a one-year practice development follow-up project was undertaken with the aim to create a team of NHS/specialist palliative care (SPC)-based facilitators to lead and support OSCaRS provision in up to 50 care homes in one region in Scotland-the focus of this paper. METHODS: Forty care home managers attended an on-line session explaining the project, with a similar session held for 19 NHS/SPC-based nurses external to care homes. Those interested in facilitating OSCaRS then attended three education sessions. DATA COLLECTED: records of all activities; reflective notes on OSCaRS organised/delivered; a summary of each OSCaRS reflection/learning points; final interviews with NHS/SPC trainee facilitators. RESULTS: A total of 19 NHS/SPC facilitators delivered one or more OSCaRS in 22 participating care homes. However, as of January 2022 only six trained facilitators remained active. Out of the 158 OSCaRS arranged, 96 took place with a total of 262 staff attending. There were three important aspects that emerged: the role, remit, and resources of NHS/SPC supporting OSCaRS; requirements within care homes for establishing OSCaRS; and, the practice-based learning topics discussed at each OSCaRS. CONCLUSION: Attempts to establish a team of NHS/SPC facilitators to lead OSCaRS highlights that end of life care education in care homes does not clearly fall within the contractual remit of either group or risks being missed due to more pressing priorities.

Using reflective practice to support PhD students in the biosciences.

Postgraduate study can be mentally, physically and emotionally challenging. The levels of anxiety and depression in postgraduate students are much higher than those in the general population, and isolation can also be a problem, especially for students who are marginalised due to gender, race, sexuality, disability or being a first-generation and/or international student. These challenges are not new, but awareness of them has increased over the past decade, as have efforts by institutions to make students feel supported. Under the umbrella of a Doctoral Training Partnership, we developed a programme in which reflective practice is employed to help postgraduate students navigate work environments, deal with difficult supervisory or professional relationships, and improve their work-life balance. Additionally, this reflective practice is allowing the training partnership to tailor support to its students, enabling them to effectively nurture our next generation of bioscientists.

Reflective practice in medicine: The hidden curriculum challenge.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefits of reflection in various health care professions, it is still not a thriving practice in medical education. The literature suggests that this may be due to tensions between epistemological tenets of reflection and biomedicine. Further research is needed into experiences of doctors as they implement reflection in medical education settings. We set out to explore how these experiences were influenced by hidden curricula to provide insights into personal and contextual features of medical settings influencing engagement in reflection. METHODS: Using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach, four semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted virtually. Participants were doctors who graduated from a postgraduate diploma in clinical education with core reflective practice components. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed using IPA. Opportunities to review and amend transcriptions were provided. FINDINGS: Three superordinate themes were identified including epistemological divergence, fear of showing vulnerability and reflection volte-face. Challenges in engaging in practices epistemologically different to predominant discourses in medicine were compounded by fears of vulnerability and a common antipathy towards reflection. All developed more accommodating perspectives towards reflection with shared experiences of a programme incorporating reflective practice. CONCLUSION: The hidden curriculum can have positive and negative impacts on doctors' engagement in reflection. In facilitating reflective practice for this group, we recommend assisting with awareness of ways of thinking and being in medicine, offering reassurance that reflection may initially feel like running contrary to predominant discourses and finally, role modelling openness to vulnerability to better integrate and promote meaningful engagement in reflection.

Reflective supervision and reflective practice in infant mental health: A scoping review of a diverse body of literature.

Reflective practice is a core component of Infant Mental Health (IMH) training and work in the form of reflective supervision/consultation (RS/C). RS/C supports and facilitates relationship-based practice, and is considered to help prevent burnout and promote work satisfaction. In response to an identified gap in empirical research on RS/C, this scoping review aimed to give an overview of the broad range of study designs and outcomes by systematically charting empirical studies on RS/C in IMH-based work with children and families. Searches of Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsychArticles, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science were supplemented with a Google Scholar search and citation searching. Following title/abstract screening (n = 233) and full-text review (n = 168), 35 reports met criteria for inclusion. Key findings were organized into four categories: Essential components and processes of RS/C; Experiences and outcomes of RS/C; Emerging issues in RS/C literature; and Measuring, researching, and reporting on RS/C. Results describe the components and experience of engaging in quality RS/C, and show that practitioners generally experience RS/C as supportive and beneficial. The existing literature has some methodological limitations and further empirical research is needed on outcomes of RS/C. Practice implications and potential future research directions are discussed.

La práctica con reflexión es un componente central del entrenamiento y trabajo en el campo de Salud Mental Infantil (IMH), en forma de una supervisión/consulta con reflexión (RS/C). RS/C apoya y facilita la práctica que tiene como base la relación y se considera que ayuda a prevenir el agotamiento y a promover la satisfacción en el trabajo. Como respuesta a un identificado vacío en la investigación empírica sobre RS/C, esta revisión de los antecedentes se propuso presentar una visión general de la amplia gama de diseños y resultados de estudios por medio de un trazado sistemático de estudios empíricos sobre RS/C en el trabajo basado en IMH con niños y familias. La búsqueda en Academic Search Complete (Completa Búsqueda Académica), en CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA, PsychArticles, APA PsycInfo y Web of Science (Red de la Ciencia) se suplementó con una búsqueda en Google Scholar y una búsqueda de citas anotadas. Después de seguir la detección de título/resumen (n = 233) y una revisión del texto completo (n = 168), 35 reportes reunieron los criterios para ser incluidos. Los resultados claves se organizaron en 4 categorías: Componentes y procesos esenciales de RS/C; Experiencias y resultados de RS/C; Asuntos incipientes en la literatura sobre RS/C; y Medir, investigar y reportar sobre RS/C. Los resultados describen los componentes y experiencias de participar en RS/C de calidad, y muestran que los profesionales de la práctica generalmente experimentan RS/C como un proceso de apoyo y beneficioso. La literatura existente tiene algunas limitaciones metodológicas y se necesita una mayor investigación empírica sobre los resultados de RS/C. Se discuten las implicaciones en la práctica y las potenciales directrices para la futura investigación.

Improbable but possible: Training children to accept the possibility of unusual events.

Young children tend to deny the possibility of events that violate their expectations, including events that are merely improbable, like making onion-flavored ice cream or owning a crocodile as a pet. Could this tendency be countered by teaching children more valid strategies for judging possibility? We explored this question by training children aged 4-12 (n = 128) to consider either the similarity between the target event and unusual events that have actually occurred or causal mechanisms that might bring the target event about. Both trainings increased children's acceptance of improbable events but only for the types of events addressed during training. Older children were more likely to accept improbable events, as were children who scored higher on a measure of cognitive reflection, but neither age nor cognitive reflection moderated the effects of training. These findings indicate that children can use both similarity and causality to assess possibility, but the use of this information is highly circumscribed, further demonstrating how robustly children conflate improbability with impossibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).