Fluorescent Marker as a Tool to Improve Strategies to Control Contaminated Surfaces and Decrease Danger of Cross-Contamination in Dental Clinics, during and beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic posed an increased threat to dental personnel and patients. Close encounters with patients' breath and saliva and the use of intraoral rotating instruments which disperse microscopic airborne particles both increase the possibility of environmental infection. In this study, fluorescent marker (FM) was used to assess and enhance surface cleanliness in the dental clinics and public areas of a major dental school. Initially, 574 surfaces in various areas of a dental school were marked with FM for 3 consecutive months to monitor the surface cleanliness. The initial evaluation results were visually presented to both students and para-dental and cleaning personnel during a designated educational session, and were used to stress the importance of preventing cross-contamination. Following educational intervention, 662 surfaces were re-examined for an additional 3 months, using the same method. A significant improvement in the surfaces' cleanliness (ANOVA, F(1) = 10.89, p < 0.005) was observed post-intervention. The results were more prominent in students' clinics, which were the students' cleaning responsibility. The results show that fluorescent markers can serve as an educational tool to improve strategies to control contaminated surfaces in large clinics, such as dental schools. Their use can substantially decrease the hazard of cross-contamination during the pandemic and beyond.

Differentiating between stress- and EPT-induced electrodermal activity during dental examination.

Dental pain invokes the sympathetic nervous system, which can be measured by electrodermal activity (EDA). In the dental clinic, accurate quantification of pain is needed because it could enable optimized drug-dose treatments, thereby potentially reducing drug addiction. However, a confounding factor is that during pain there is also lingering residual stress, hence, both contribute to the EDA response. Therefore, we investigated whether EDA can differentiate stress from pain during dental examination. The use of electrical pulp test (EPT) is an ideal approach to tease out the dynamics of stress and mimic pain with lingering residual stress. Once the electrical sensation is felt and reaches a critical current threshold, the subject removes the probe from their tooth, hence, this stage of data represents largely EPT stimulus and the residual stress-induced EDA response is smaller. EPT was performed on necrotic and vital teeth in fifty-one subjects. We defined four different data groups of reactions based on each individual's EPT intensity level expectation based on the visual analog scale (VAS) of their baseline trial, as follows: mild stress, mild stress + EPT, strong stress, and strong stress + EPT. EDA-derived features exhibited significant difference between residual lingering stress + EPT groups and stress groups. We obtained 84.6% accuracy with 76.2% sensitivity and 86.8% specificity with multilayer perceptron in differentiating between pure-stress groups vs. stress + EPT groups. Moreover, EPT induced much greater EDA amplitude and faster response than stress. Our finding suggests that our machine learning approach can discriminate between stress and EPT stimulation in EDA signals.

Current tobacco use and COVID-19 diagnoses in a cohort of adult clients of public dental clinics in Sweden.

Smoking has been linked with both increased and decreased risk of COVID-19, prompting the hypothesis of a protective role of nicotine in the pathogenesis of the disease. Studies of the association between use of smokeless tobacco and COVID-19 would help refining this hypothesis. We analysed data from 424,386 residents in the Stockholm Region, Sweden, with information on smoking and smokeless tobacco (snus) use prior to the pandemic obtained from dental records. Diagnoses of COVID-19 between February and October 2020 were obtained from health-care registers. We estimated the risk of receiving a diagnosis of COVID-19 for current smokers and for current snus users relative to non-users of tobacco, adjusting for potential confounders (aRR). The aRR of COVID -19 was elevated for current snus users (1.09 ;95%CI = 0.99-1.21 among men and 1.15; 95%CI = 1.00-1.33 among women). The risk for women consuming more than 1 can/day was twice as high as among non-users of tobacco. Current smoking was negatively associated with risk of COVID-19 (aRR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.61-0.75); including hospital admission (aRR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.47-0.76) and intensive care (aRR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.21-0.89). The hypothesis of a protective effect of tobacco nicotine on COVID-19 was not supported by the findings. The negative association between smoking and COVID-19 remains unexplained.

[Barriers for visiting a dental clinic among (frail) older individuals; the momentum of the influenza vaccination as finding place]. / Barrières bij (kwetsbare) ouderen voor bezoek tandartspraktijk; griepprikmomentum als vindplaats.

As age increases, the proportion of older people visiting a dental practice decreases. The aim of this survey was to gain insight into the extent to which frailty and/or dental status are related to visiting a dental practice and what barriers older (frail) people experience in this respect. A questionnaire was distributed among people eligible for the annual flu vaccination in Winschoten, The Netherlands. In total, 1027 people aged 60 and over completed the questionnaire. 60-80% of them had recently visited a dental practice depending on their frailty. Dental status was the decisive factor for not visiting a dental practice. Edentulous individuals were more likely not to visit than (partially) dentate individuals. Barriers to visiting a dental practice were related to making an appointment, costs, and/or the services provided. The flu vaccination seems to be an interesting momentum to identify people who do not, or no longer, visit a dental practice.

Risk Factors Associated with Children Receiving Treatment at Emergency Dental Clinics: A Case-Control Study.

(1) Background: The process of managing children at the emergency dental clinic (ER-C) is a difficult challenge. This matched case-control study assessed risk factors associated with children visiting the ER-C compared to visits at the regular dental clinic (RD-C). (2) Methods: The participants included 421 children aged three to 12 years who were recruited at the ER-C (cases) and RD-C (controls) at King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital, with each group matched for gender and age. A data-collection form was developed and validated in both Arabic and English, containing the following four sections: DMFT/dmft index, Frankl's behaviour rating scale, Dental Neglect Scale, and Dental Care Barriers questionnaire. (3) Results: The ER-C (vs RD-C) group showed significantly more uncooperative behaviour (p = 0.002), a higher total mean dental neglect score (p = 0.003), and a higher dental barrier score (p < 0.001). Binary regression analysis showed that those making their first visit (AOR: 2.65, p < 0.001) and with higher dental barriers (AOR: 1.121, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly more associated with ER-C visitation. (4) Conclusion: These findings suggest that children who visit the ER-C are more prone to dental care barriers, uncooperative behaviour, and dental neglect, thus highlighting the importance of encouraging and planning their attendance to ensure optimal dental care.

Emergency protocol in the dental clinic: Assessing medical emergency training requirements and guidelines for dentists.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergencies are an unavoidable reality affecting dental practices. This review synthesizes and examines the guidelines offered by governmental and professional organizations. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: Licensing agencies and professional associations were chosen as organizations of focus based on legal authority, high professional regard, or both. International and interprofessional organizational counterparts were chosen as points of comparison. In total, 11 organizations were examined. Guidelines reported were compiled by examination of documents published on official agency websites and in associated peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Guidelines for the handling of medical emergencies in the dental clinic vary in level of detail and scope among sources. Licensing agencies provide basic requirements for training, encouraging oral health care providers to develop and integrate their own emergency response plans. Professional associations provide extensive detail on instruction in medical emergency management. Both licensing agencies and professional associations provide lists of emergency medications and equipment, with varying levels of instruction on drug maintenance and organization. Professional associations emphasize regular review of training and office emergency drills. CONCLUSION: Oral health care professionals are provided with basic and required elements of medical emergency training by licensing agencies. They may seek out recommended, but not required, instruction from professional associations. Although guidance is provided, literature on protocol instituted in dental practices is limited. Further research is necessary to determine the oral health care community's approach to emergency management. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Providers must be prepared to handle medical emergencies that they encounter. Accessible and understandable guidelines are crucial to safe dental practice.

Current tobacco use and COVID-19 diagnoses in a cohort of adult clients of public dental clinics in Sweden.

Smoking has been linked with both increased and decreased risk of COVID-19, prompting the hypothesis of a protective role of nicotine in the pathogenesis of the disease. Studies of the association between use of smokeless tobacco and COVID-19 would help refining this hypothesis. We analysed data from 424,386 residents in the Stockholm Region, Sweden, with information on smoking and smokeless tobacco (snus) use prior to the pandemic obtained from dental records. Diagnoses of COVID-19 between February and October 2020 were obtained from health-care registers. We estimated the risk of receiving a diagnosis of COVID-19 for current smokers and for current snus users relative to non-users of tobacco, adjusting for potential confounders (aRR). The aRR of COVID -19 was elevated for current snus users (1.09 ;95%CI = 0.99-1.21 among men and 1.15; 95%CI = 1.00-1.33 among women). The risk for women consuming more than 1 can/day was twice as high as among non-users of tobacco. Current smoking was negatively associated with risk of COVID-19 (aRR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.61-0.75); including hospital admission (aRR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.47-0.76) and intensive care (aRR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.21-0.89). The hypothesis of a protective effect of tobacco nicotine on COVID-19 was not supported by the findings. The negative association between smoking and COVID-19 remains unexplained.

Urgent care frequency of the assessment carried out in a School Clinic of a Dental College of Minas Gerais

To evaluate the frequency of dental emergencies and specifications, along with the patient's profile attended at the Clinical School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Juiz de Fora Health (Supreme). We selected 152 medical records of clinical dental school of Juiz de Fora University Hospital - MG were selected and assessed the patient's profile and the classification of emergency cases. It was found that 57.2% of the patients were female and 42.7% male. The age of these patients is on average 44 years and the most frequent causes of visits were: dental prosthesis, endodontic and dental trauma. It can be conclude that some of the diseases found in dental emergencies are likely to be prevented or identified early on. Patients with pain are part of most attending emergency care services. In order to control the emergency care and improve the solvability, preventive actions should be developed, promoting a preventive rather than curative health.

Follow-up study of veterans with white and red oral mucosal lesions at Veterans Affairs Dental Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis examined the clinical and histopathological characteristics of white and red oral mucosal lesions and patient lifestyle behaviors to understand how the lesions changed over 19-23 years, including among patients who developed oral and pharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five individuals with red and/or white oral mucosal lesions with clinical diagnoses of smokeless tobacco lesions, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen planus, ulcer, and virus-associated lesions were identified in six Veterans Affairs Medical Center Dental Clinics (VAMC) from 1996 to 2001. Biopsy results and patients' sociodemographic, medical, and tobacco/alcohol use characteristics were obtained. Study dentists used standardized forms to capture information about the lesions. Study participants were re-examined at intervals through January 2002. In 2020, a retrospective review of VAMC and public records ascertained whether participants developed oral cancer or died. RESULTS: The most common red or white oral mucosal lesions among the 75 study participants were leukoplakia (36.0%), smokeless tobacco lesions (26.7%), virus-associated lesions (18.7%), and lichen planus (16.0%). Lesions in 11% of participants with leukoplakia and one-third of participants with lichen planus persisted for 5 years or more. Dysplasia was present in four participants with leukoplakia. Seventeen percent of participants developed a new white or red oral mucosal lesion. Five patients (6.1%) developed oral or pharyngeal cancer, four among participants with leukoplakia (one with prior dysplasia) and one among participants with lichen planus. Four of the cancers developed 6-20 years after enrollment, and only one was at the original lesion site. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of oral and pharyngeal cancers in some study participants with white and red oral mucosal lesions many years after enrollment reinforces the need for patients, dentists, and health care systems to have better methods to identify and assess the malignant potential of oral lesions, monitor patients over time, and intercept high-risk oral lesions before they become cancerous.

Prevalence and Patterns of Traumatic Dental Injuries in the Permanent Dentition: A Three-Year Retrospective Overview Study at the University Dental Clinic of Vienna.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the prevalence and patterns of traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) in permanent teeth at the University Dental Clinic of Vienna and examine influential variables. The study included all patients with dental trauma in permanent teeth who presented at the University Dental Clinic of Vienna (Austria) between 2014 and 2016. Dental records, including age, gender, location of trauma, type of trauma, cause of TDI, and location of the traumatic incident, were obtained. Clinical oral and radiographic examinations were conducted in accordance with the current guidelines of the German Society of Dental, Oral, and Craniomandibular Sciences (DGZMK). The sample comprised 1132 permanent teeth of 578 patients with TDIs. The most frequently injured teeth were upper central incisors (n = 719, 63.5%), followed by upper lateral incisors (n = 231, 20.4%). Fractures were the most frequent injury type (53%, n = 596). TDIs mostly occur due to falling accidents. The majority of traumatic incidents occurred at home (79.4%, n = 459). The injury characteristics are comparable to the results of other international studies. Due to the high prevalence of TDIs in dental medicine, dental practitioners should be equipped to effectively manage their immediate care and treat potential long-term complications.

The potential of articaine as new generation of local anesthesia in dental clinics: A review.

As a new drug for local dental anesthesia, articaine has become popular in the clinic in recent years. In this review, we describe the development of articaine, explain its mechanism of action, compare its efficacy with that of other commonly used local anesthetics in dental treatment, and summarize the application of articaine in special populations. In conclusion, the anesthetic efficacy of articaine in clinical dental treatment is better than that of lidocaine, and its safety is not statistically different from that of lidocaine. In particular, articaine has several advantages and can be selected flexibly for clinical use. Atecaine has great potential for wide application in dental clinics in the near future.

Bacterial Profile, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern, and Associated Factors among Dental Caries-Suspected Patients Attending the Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and Private Dental Clinic in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia.

Background: Dental caries is a major public oral infectious disease globally due to its high prevalence and significant social impact. Many studies have been conducted on dental caries in Ethiopia; however, they fail to convey the antimicrobial resistance in the oral environment. Objective: This study was conducted to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and biofilm formation in the bacteria isolated from dental caries and its associated factors of dental caries in THE Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and private dental clinics located at Mekelle, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2019 to October 2020. Sociodemographic characteristic, behavioral, and clinical data were collected using structured questionnaires. A total of 422 dental caries-suspected patients were selected and coronal caries scraps were collected by the dentist aseptically; these samples were transported to a microbiological laboratory to identify the antibiotic sensitivity assay and biofilm formation by the isolated pathogens. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. The P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The overall prevalence of culture-positive samples was found to be 196 (46.4%). From the 196 culture-positive samples, 327 bacteria were isolated. Out of 327 bacterial isolates, 196 (46.4%) were identified as Streptococcus mutans and 69 (35.2%) were identified to be Staphylococcus aureus. From the isolated bacteria, 311 (95.1%) organisms were identified as positive for biofilm formation. From the AST assay, we have identified that penicillin has the highest resistance rate of 76.5%, followed by tetracycline at 64.8%. In contrast, the antibiotics such as cefoxitin and chloramphenicol have a sensitivity of 83.5% and 81.6% to all the bacterial isolates. The overall prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) in the isolates was found to be 40.4%. With respect to the associated risk factors, the white spot (AOR = 3.885, 95% CI 1.282-11.767, P = 0.016), gum bleeding (AOR = 2.820, 95% CI 1.006-7.907, P = 0.049), toothache (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 0.58-0.885, P = 0.033), and chocolate consumption (AOR = 5.314, 95% CI 1.760-16.040, P = 0.003) were statically associated with dental caries bacterial infection. Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend the integration of routine culture and AST into clinical practice that might support the diagnosis and management of MDR in dental caries. The education on proper dietary habits might support the prevention and control of dental caries. It is important to provide health education on how to improve oral health in the study area. The education on proper dietary habits might support the prevention and control of dental caries. Further study is needed to find the other determinant factors of dental caries.

The Healing Environment of Dental Clinics through the Eyes of Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Pilot Study.

The physical environment of healthcare settings can promote both the healing process and patient feelings of well-being, as well as instill positive emotions in employees. The present study aimed to evaluate the dental work environment of a typical private and public dental clinic to identify key parameters that determine the perception of health facilities by patients and employees. The study was carried out from 1 to 20 December 2021, in two dental clinics in Ekaterinburg (Russian Federation) using 'ASPECT'. The participants were 58 staff and 94 patients. The results showed that, compared with patients, staff reported higher views scores, nature and outdoors scores, and comfort and control scores. The common criterion that distinguishes private clinics from public ones was comfort and control. Compared with patients in state clinics, patients in private clinics reported higher privacy, company and dignity scores, comfort and control scores, interior appearance scores, and facility scores. In general, while views scores and nature parameters can be singled out as a universal absolute value for everyone in a particular environment, staff pay more attention to factors that contribute to long-term comfortable stay and performance of their duties.

Evaluation of microbial air quality and aerosol distribution in a large dental clinic.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the microbial air quality during dental clinical procedures in a large clinical setting with increasing patient capacity. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational study design evaluating the microbial air quality and aerosol distribution during normal clinical sessions at 5% (sessions 1 and 2) and at > 50% (session 3) treatment capacity of dental aerosol generating procedures. Sessions 1 and 2 were evaluated on the same day with a 30-minute fallow time between the sessions. Session 3 was evaluated on a separate day. For each session, passive air-sampling technique was performed for three collection periods: baseline, treatment, and post-treatment. Blood agar plates were collected and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. Colonies were counted using an automatic colony counter. Mean colony forming units (CFU) per plate were converted to CFU/m²/h. RESULTS: Kruskal Wallis test was performed to compare the mean CFU/m²/h between the clinic sessions. Statistically significant differences were observed between sessions 1 and 2 (P< 0.05), but not between sessions 2 and 3 (P> 0.05). Combining all clinical sessions, the mean CFU/m²/h were 977 (baseline), 873 (treatment), and 1,631 (post-treatment) for the collection periods. A decrease-to-increase CFU/m²/h trend was observed from baseline to treatment, and from treatment to post-treatment that was observed for all clinic sessions and was irrespective to treatment capacity. Higher amounts of CFU/m²/h were found near the air exhaust outlets for all three clinic sessions. Microbial aerosol distribution is most likely due to the positions and power levels of the air inlets and outlets, and to a lesser extent with patient treatment capacity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental clinics should be designed and optimized to minimize the risk of airborne transmissions. The results of this study emphasize the need to evaluate dental clinic ventilation systems.

The impact of vaccination upon dental clinic avoidance and the cessation of individual protection measures.

The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of germ aversion, to perceived infectability and to the fear of COVID-19 from the beginning of the pandemic until the arrival of the vaccines. A repeated measures design was used with three time points during the pandemic. The survey consisted of: Scale of perceived vulnerability to disease; Scale of fear of COVID-19; They were asked if they were vaccinated and if that vaccination is complete. They were asked if they would avoid the dental clinic through fear of COVID-19; and if they have reduced preventive practice in response to COVID-19. A T0-T1 increase in perceived infectability and germ aversion was reported. However, fear of COVID-19 decreased at T1-T2. The vaccinated experienced a greater reduction than the unvaccinated and a greater relaxation of their preventive practice. The frequency of dental avoidance decreased in the vaccinated group from T1 to T2 by 68.3% while in the non-vaccinated this reduction was only 4.9%; X 2 = 18.58 (p < 0.01). In summary, vaccination has had an impact in the reduction of perceived infectability and in reducing fear of COVID-19. Nevertheless, germ aversion has remained stable and independent of vaccination. Empirical support is found for the affirmation that vaccination can reduce certain preventive behavior and dental avoidance.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to COVID-19 among patients attending public dental clinics in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of contracting COVID-19 through dental treatment is potentially high, thus several guidelines have been developed to minimize the spread of COVID-19 in the dental office worldwide. These changes have posed some relevant questions among oral health professionals regarding the understanding and attitudes of dental patients toward COVID-19. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of dental patients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was carried out in 4 public hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania involving 472 adult patients. Data were collected using a questionnaire that had a set of questions regarding knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) related to COVID-19. Data were analyzed using the SPSS computer software version 26. For descriptive analysis means, standard error of the mean, and proportion were used. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized for the response analysis. Alpha of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Good levels of knowledge, attitude, and practices related to COVID-19 were found in 76.5%, 74.8%, and 58.1% of participants respectively. On performing multivariate analysis, odds of having good knowledge regarding COVID-19 were almost 2 folds higher in participants who were females, with high education levels, those without partners, and those with stable income. Females were 1.5 folds more likely to have a good attitude toward COVID-19 and odds of good practice against COVID-19 were 3 folds higher in young adults compared to the elderly. CONCLUSION: A majority of dental patients have good knowledge and attitude related to COVID-19. Predictors of good knowledge were sex, education level, marital status, and income of the participants. Sex predicted good attitude and age predicted good practice.

Cases of dental clinic visits by COVID-19-confirmed patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to review cases of dental visits by patients who had confirmed COVID-19 infection in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. It analyses the patterns of infection transmission among dental healthcare professionals and dental clinic visitors. METHODS: This study obtained data from reports on disease trends and press releases published by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) on its COVID-19 website. RESULTS: After examining cases of patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection, 24 people (10 in Seoul and 14 in Gyeonggi-do) visited the dental office 1-13 days prior to their case confirmation; however, the spread of the virus in the dental office was not confirmed. CONCLUSION: The WHO and KCDC guidelines must be followed to curb transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus among dental patients and professionals.

Subjective cognitive complaints and dental clinic visits: A cross-sectional study from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.

AIM: We investigated the association between subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) and dental visits in older Japanese adults. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (carried out in 2019). The participants were independent older adults aged ≥65 years without dementia. The presence/absence of dental treatment visits and dental checkup visits within the past 12 months were used as outcome variables. The SCC score measured using the Kihon Checklist was set as the explanatory variable. Possible confounders were also included as covariates. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The mean age was 74.1 years (standard deviation 6.0 years). Among the 19 677 eligible participants, 12 359 (62.8%) had dental treatment visits and 11 063 (56.3%) had dental checkup visits. Of these, 5966 (30.3%) had an SCC score of ≥1. The proportion of participants with dental treatment and dental checkup visits within the past 12 months was 63.2% and 56.7% among those with SCC score = 0, and 52.8% and 35.2% among those with SCC score = 3, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, no significant association was observed for participants with SCC scores of 1 and 2. Those with SCC score = 3 had less frequent dental checkup visits (prevalence ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that SCC was not associated with limited access to dental care among those with mild SCC. However, those with the highest SCC score seemed to have disturbed access to dental care. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 773-778.

Perception and Concerns about the Use of Gloves, Facemask, and HIV Discriminatory Attitude of Children attending Dental Clinics in Southern Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: The use of face masks and gloves can prevent possible cross infection between dental patients and health care practitioners. AIM: The study identified the perception of paediatric dental patients on the need for dentists to use face masks and gloves; and their attitude towards using the same clinic with paediatric dental patients living with HIV. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study that recruited 438 children aged 8-15 years attending three paediatric dental clinics located in Southern Nigeria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The dependent variables were perception of cross infection control and attitude towards children living with HIV. The independent variables were age, sex, socioeconomic status and location of clinic. Chi-square analysis was conducted to determine the associations between the dependent and independent variables. Logistic regression analysis was also conducted to assess the effect size of the associations between the dependent and independent variables. The level of statistical significance was inferred at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Majority of the respondents agreed that it was necessary to wear gloves (98.6%) and facemasks (88.1%) during patients' management. More females 62(28.2%) than males 38(17.4%) assumed gloves were used by dentists to protect themselves from patients' bad breath (p=0.007). More children from Benin 97(64.2%) were aware that face masks protect the dentists and the patients (p=0.004), and a few believed that it is embarrassing to patients for dentists to wear facemasks (p=0.001). More children 102(70.8%) from Ile-Ife perceived that face masks protects from bad breath (p=0.004).Children less than 10 years (AOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.42-1.70; p=0.64), with high socioeconomic status (AOR: 0.90; 95% CI:0.53-1.52; p=0.70) and children aged 10 to 14 years (AOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.44-1.63; p=0.62), in the middle socioeconomic status (AOR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.39-1.33; p=0.30) were less willing to use the dental clinic alongside children living with HIV. CONCLUSION: There were sex, and clinic location disparity in the perception and attitude of children towards the use of Personal Protective Equipment and the use of the dental clinic alongside children living with HIV.

INTRODUCTION: L'utilisation de masques faciaux et de gants peut prévenir une éventuelle infection croisée entre les patients dentaires et les praticiens de santé. OBJECTIF: L'étude a identifié la perception des patients dentaires pédiatriques sur la nécessité pour les dentistes d'utiliser des masques et des gants ; et leur attitude vis-à-vis de l'utilisation de la même clinique avec des patients dentaires pédiatriques vivant avec le VIH. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une étude transversale qui a recruté 438 enfants âgés de 8 à 15 ans fréquentant trois cliniques dentaires pédiatriques situées dans le sud du Nigeria. ANALYSE STATISTIQUE: Les variables dépendantes étaient la perception du contrôle des infections croisées et l'attitude envers les enfants vivant avec le VIH. Les variables indépendantes étaient l'âge, le sexe, le statut socio-économique et le lieu de la clinique. Une analyse du chi carré a été réalisée pour déterminer les associations entre les variables dépendantes et indépendantes. Une analyse de régression logistique a également été réalisée pour évaluer la taille de l'effet des associations entre les variables dépendantes et indépendantes. Le niveau de signification statistique a été déduit à P < 0,05. RÉSULTATS: La majorité des répondants étaient d'accord pour dire qu'il était nécessaire de porter des gants (98,6 %) et des masques (88,1 %) pendant la prise en charge des patients. Plus de femmes 62(28,2%) que d'hommes 38(17,4%) ont supposé que les gants étaient utilisés par les dentistes pour se protéger de la mauvaise haleine des patients (p=0,007). Plus d'enfants béninois 97(64,2%) savaient que les masques faciaux protègent les dentistes et les patients (p=0,004), et quelques-uns pensaient que le port de masques faciaux par les dentistes était gênant pour les patients (p=0,001). Les enfants de moins de 10 ans (AOR : 0.85 ; 95% CI : 0.42-1.70 ; p=0.64), avec un statut socio-économique élevé (AOR : 0.90 ; 95% CI:0.53-1.52 ; p=0.70) et les enfants âgés de 10 à 14 ans (AOR : 0,85 ; IC 95% : 0,44-1,63; p=0,62), au statut socio-économique moyen (AOR : 0,72 ; IC 95% : 0,39-1,33 ; p=0,30) étaient moins disposés à utiliser la clinique dentaire aux côtés des enfants vivant avec le VIH. CONCLUSION: Il y avait une disparités de sexe et de lieu de clinique dans la perception et l'attitude des enfants vis-à-vis de l'utilisation des équipements de protection individuelle et de l'utilisation de la clinique dentaire avec les enfants vivant avec le VIH. Mots clés: Masque, Gants, VIH, Discriminatoire, Enfants.