EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with pathological staging.

OBJECTIVE: Although EBUS-TBNA combined with EUS-FNA or EUS-B-FNA stands as the primary approach for mediastinal staging in lung cancer, guidelines recommend mediastinoscopy confirmation if a lymph node identified on chest CT or showing increased PET scan uptake yields negativity on these techniques. This study aimed to assess the staging precision of EBUS/EUS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study comparing the clinical staging of non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing EBUS/EUS with their post-surgery pathological staging. We analyzed the influence of histology, location, tumor size, and the time lapse between EBUS and surgery. Patients with N0/N1 staging on EBUS/EUS, undergoing surgery, and with at least one station approached in both procedures were selected. Post-surgery, patients were categorized into N0/N1 and N2 groups. RESULTS: Among the included patients (n = 47), pathological upstaging to N2 occurred in 6 (12.8%). Of these, 4 (66.7%) had a single N2 station, and 2 (33.3%) had multiple N2 stations. The adenopathy most frequently associated with upstaging was station 7. None of the analyzed variables demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of upstaging. PET scan indicated increased uptake in only one of these adenopathies, and only one was visualized on chest CT. CONCLUSIONS: Upstaging proved independent of the studied variables, and only 2 patients with negative EBUS/EUS would warrant referral for mediastinoscopy. Exploring other noninvasive methods with even greater sensitivity for detecting micrometastatic lymph node disease is crucial.

[Changes in mediastinal lymph node sampling practices]. / Évolution des pratiques concernant l'exploration ganglionnaire médiastinale.

INTRODUCTION: While mediastinoscopy is considered the gold standard for mediastinal node sampling, it is to some extent being superseded by endobronchial ultrasound. The objective of this study was to evaluate the different practices in our center regarding mediastinal lymph node sampling in lung cancer patients. METHODS: Data were collected from patients having undergone mediastinal lymph node sampling by video-assisted-mediastinoscopy (VM) or by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in our center between August 2020 and July 2023. The modalities of the two procedures and their diagnostic accuracy were analyzed, as was their evolution over time. RESULTS: The 362 patients comprised 217 who were sampled by EBUS and 145 by VM. Overall, the procedures became more frequent, with EBUS tending to supersede VM. The number of harvested lymph nodes gradually grew, and less unforeseen lymph node invasion and upstaging occurred. CONCLUSION: The arrival in our center of endobronchial ultrasound yielded an overall increase of lymph node sampling despite a decrease in the number of mediastinoscopy procedures performed. Reinforced compliance with guidelines is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques and to better ensure quality of care.

An update on the minimally invasive diagnosis of lymphoma for the chest physicians.

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy has a broad differential diagnosis which includes lymphoma. The current preferred biopsy technique for mediastinal lymph nodes is transbronchial needle aspiration which has mixed results in terms of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic yields; there are also limitations with subtyping lymphomas with needle aspiration alone which can be a barrier to determine management strategies. Invasive mediastinal lymph node sampling such was with mediastinoscopy provides higher yields and preserved lymph node architecture for both diagnosis and subtyping of lymphoma but carries a higher risk of morbidity and complications. Novel techniques that may increase the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lymphoma are core biopsy needles, intranodal forcep biopsy, and intranodal cryobiopsy. The evidence is limited due to a relatively small number of cases, so further research is needed to standardize best practices for the bronchoscopic diagnosis of lymphoma. Pleural effusions in lymphoma can be present in up to 30 % of cases with the majority being non-Hodgkins's lymphoma. The presence of exudative effusion in the setting of an existing or prior diagnosis of lymphoma should raise clinical suspicions. Other less common subtypes of lymphoma presenting as primary pleural effusions are explored as well.

Tracheal repair with sternocleidomastoid flap in mediastinoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.

Tracheal injury during mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a life-threatening complication that is challenging to manage. However, no precise treatment has been defined. An 80-year-old male patient with upper esophageal cancer underwent a mediastinoscopic esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction through the posterior mediastinal route. When the esophagus was separated from the trachea using a bipolar vessel sealing system, the left side of the membranous trachea incurred a 3-cm defect 7 cm below the sternal notch. We successfully repaired the tracheal injury not by directly suturing the defect but by reinforcing it with a pedicle sternocleidomastoid flap. The gastric tube was placed over the tracheal repair for esophageal reconstruction via a posterior mediastinal route. As a result, the patient recovered well and was discharged. A sternocleidomastoid flap might be another surgical option for reinforcement flaps in tracheal injuries.

Substitute or coexistence? Mediastinoscopy-assisted versus thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Currently, mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE) and thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy (TAE) represent two prevalent forms of minimally invasive esophagectomy extensively employed in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess and compare these two surgical approaches concerning perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, offering valuable insights for refining surgical strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in this field. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CNKI databases until 1 March 2024, for studies comparing MAE and TAE. Outcomes of interest included perioperative outcomes (intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications) and survival rates. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity dictating the use of fixed or random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 21 relevant studies were finally included. MAE was associated with significantly shorter operation times [mean difference (MD)=-59.58 min, 95% CI: -82.90 to -36.26] and less intraoperative blood loss (MD=-68.34 ml, 95% CI: -130.45 to -6.23). However, MAE resulted in fewer lymph nodes being dissected (MD=-3.50, 95% CI: -6.23 to -0.78). Postoperative recovery was enhanced following MAE, as evidenced by reduced hospital stays and tube times. MAE significantly reduced pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81] but increased the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.60). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, cardiac complications, wound infections, and gastric retention between MAE and TAE. The long-term survival outcomes showed no statistical difference [hazard ratio (HR)=1.05, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.54]. CONCLUSIONS: MAE offers advantages in reducing operation time, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, with a shorter recovery period compared to TAE. However, it poses a higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and results in fewer lymph nodes being dissected. No difference in long-term survival was observed, indicating that both techniques have distinct benefits and limitations. These findings underscore the need for personalized surgical approaches in EC treatment, considering individual patient characteristics and tumor specifics.

Minimally Invasive with Maximal Yield: A Narrative Review of Current Practices in Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States despite declining incidence and improved outcomes because of advancements in early detection and development of novel therapies. Accurate mediastinal lymph node staging is crucial for determining prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and January 2024 focusing on preoperative lymph node staging in adults with NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Results: Various imaging modalities, surgical and nonsurgical procedures for mediastinal lymph node staging were reviewed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography, cervical mediastinoscopy, video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and computed tomography-guided percutaneous lymph node biopsy. EBUS-FNA emerged as the preferred initial staging procedure because of its high sensitivity and low complication rate. Combining it with other procedures or confirmatory testing may be helpful in determining appropriate treatment. Conclusions: Although cervical mediastinoscopy remains a valuable confirmatory procedure in select cases, its role as a first-line staging modality is diminishing with the widespread adoption of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA. The combination of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA allows access to nearly all mediastinal lymph node stations with high diagnostic accuracy. Future research may further refine the selection criteria for invasive mediastinal staging procedures, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes in the management of NSCLC.

Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers.

OBJECTIVE: To report technical feasibility and describe procedural details of a novel single incision minimally invasive approach to the mediastinum in cadaver dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. ANIMALS: Large breed (25-40 kg) cadaver dogs (n = 10). METHODS: Three of 10 cadavers were used for preliminary technique development without data recording. Cadaver specimens underwent pre- and postoperative thoracic computed tomographic scans. Seven dogs were placed in dorsal recumbency and mediastinoscopy was performed via a SILS port placed cranial to the thoracic inlet with CO2 insufflation of the mediastinum at 2-4 mmHg. Retrieval of all CT and visually identified mediastinal lymph nodes (LN) was attempted; endoscopic compartmental and individual LN dissection times and subjective operative challenges were recorded. Procedural success scores for visualization and dissection as well as NASA-task force index scores were recorded per lymph node, per cadaver. RESULTS: Median time required for initial approach including SILS placement was 5 min (range 5-10 min). Individual LN retrieval times ranged from 2 to 32 min. Mediastinoscopic retrieval of LNs was most commonly successful for the left tracheobronchial LN (7/7), followed by the right tracheobronchial LN (4/7), the left and right sternal LNs (3/7 each), and the cranial mediastinal LNs (1/7). Post-procedure pleural gas was identified on CT in 4/7 cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinoscopy as reported was feasible in large breed canine cadavers and retrieval or cup biopsy of a variety of lymph nodes is possible from the described approach. Application in living animals and its associated challenges should be further investigated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Mediastinoscopy may provide a novel minimally invasive approach to the evaluation and oncologic staging of the cranial mediastinum in dogs.

Transhiatal bilateral cervical approach for mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (McMIE) procedure has various limitations, including surgical contraindications and a high rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. A novel mediastinoscopic esophagectomy procedure was described in this study by using esophageal invagination and a transhiatal and bilateral cervical approach (EITHBC). METHODS: According to the mode of operation, a total of 259 patients were divided into two groups, among which 106 underwent EITHBC and 153 underwent McMIE. The number of lymph nodes dissected, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The results revealed that the average number of resected lymph node in the EITHBC group was significantly higher in the recL106 and TbL106 stations (recL106: 1.75 vs. 1.51, p = 0.016, TbL106: 1.53 vs. 1.19, p = 0.016) and significantly lower in the 107 stations (1. 74 vs. 2. 07, p < 0.001) than in the McMIE group. The intraoperative blood loss in the EITHBC group was significantly lower than that in the McMIE group (63.30 vs. 80.45 mL, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the EITHBC group was lower than that in the McMIE group (14.15% vs. 27.45%, p = 0.008). The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in the EITHBC group was significantly higher than that in the McMIE group (26.41% vs. 10.46%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Compared with the McMIE procedure, the EITHBC procedure has advantages in terms of removing the upper mediastinal lymph nodes and reducing postoperative pulmonary complications.

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach for thoracic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic esophageal cancer resection through the neck approach has recently been reported as mediastinoscopic surgery. We present the first report of a new minimally invasive technique for thoracic esophageal cancer: robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach. METHODS: Ten cases of robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy performed at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, from February 2023 to August 2023 were reviewed. The short-term surgical outcomes were presented, and the feasibility and efficacy of this procedure were discussed. RESULTS: The mean operation time for the cervical procedure was 184.2 ± 23.6 min. The total time for the whole procedure was 472.7 ± 28.4 min, and total intraoperative blood loss was 162.2 ± 40.0 ml. Among the 10 cases, one patient developed recurrent nerve paralysis, one patient developed pulmonary complications, and no patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The median postoperative hospital stay was 22 (range: 12-43) days. No patients developed severe postoperative surgical complications, which were graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III. The total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes was 37.2 ± 11.2. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy, a novel procedure for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible. Using this procedure, the incidence of recurrent nerve palsy, which is a problem with transcervical esophagectomy and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy, is expected to decrease.