Ambulance nurses' experiences of pain management with Penthrox® in Swedish ambulance care: A mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Methoxyflurane (MTX) is an inhalation agent that has several potential benefits for limiting various types of pain in ambulance care. AIM: To elucidate how ambulance nurses experience the characteristics of MTX in an ambulance care setting. METHOD: This cross-sectional study applied a mixed-methods approach, using a questionnaire together with complementary interviews. The questionnaire survey was analyzed using descriptive statistics (10-point Likert scale and question index values [Q-IV], range: 0-1.0). The interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. Study results were reported following the STROBE statement. RESULTS: The ambulance nurses' overall general satisfaction with the MTX concept had a median of 7.0 (IQR 5-8), corresponding to a mean Q-IV of 0.84 (very good experience). The qualitative part was divided into three categories: sense of security, patient participation, and general usefulness. The results revealed varying experiences of usefulness, including pain-relieving effect and the possibility of patient participation. The perceived strong odor of MTX seemed to concern the ambulance nurses and their patients. CONCLUSION: In general, MTX was experienced as a safe and effective analgesic. However, the experiences of the overall usefulness varied, particularly since the product had a perceived strong odor. Increasing knowledge of using MTX, could likely increase the overall usefulness.

Literature review on the use of methoxyflurane in the management of pain in cancer-related procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Self-administered methoxyflurane, also known as Penthrox, at a sub-anesthetic dose is a short-term, fast-acting, and safe analgesic that may provide suitable pain relief for cancer patients. This review aims to compile the existing evidence on methoxyflurane and its efficacy in reducing pain during cancer-related procedures. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through OVID Medline and Embase. The search was limited to articles published between 2012 and 2021 and studies were included if they assessed the efficacy of methoxyflurane to reduce pain in cancer-related procedures. All types of cancer were included. RESULTS: The literature search yielded seven studies published between 2012 and 2021. The studies analyzed assessed methoxyflurane use in prostate biopsy, colonoscopy, removal of brachytherapy rods, and bone marrow biopsy. Various research designs were employed, including three randomized controlled trials, two prospective observational studies, one retrospective, and one non-randomized controlled trial. In all, methoxyflurane has a demonstrated ability to reduce pain in these procedures. CONCLUSION: In the limited studies available in evaluating the efficacy of methoxyflurane for reducing procedural pain during cancer-related procedures, all have demonstrated clinical equivalency or superiority. Pain relief appears to be equivalent however methoxyflurane overcomes the standard limitations of respiratory sedation and has demonstrated quicker procedural recovery times than traditional sedation methods. The accumulated data to date supports the use of methoxyflurane which can supplement or supplant current methods of analgesia in cancer-related procedures.

How I Do It: Penthrox in Urology.

Penthrox is a portable handheld inhaler that delivers a low dose of methoxyflurane - an anesthetic with analgesic effects, rapid onset of action, and a favorable side-effect profile. It has been widely used for acute pain management in Australia for the past 40 years. Currently, it is approved for use in over 55 countries, including Canada. Prospective randomized studies highlight Penthrox analgesic effectiveness and safety profile for emergency, prehospital and outpatient settings. In addition, the use of multimodal analgesia, specifically Penthrox, can play an important role in the analgesic management of urological procedures, such as prostatic biopsies and office-based minimally invasive surgical therapies. Herein readers will familiarize themselves with Penthrox, significant studies, and technique used for outpatient urological procedures.

A narrative review on pain control interventions for non-surgical pleural procedures.

Pleural diseases are common and frequently result in disabling symptoms, impaired health-related quality of life and hospitalisation. Both diagnosis and management often require pleural procedures and despite a variety of pain control strategies available for clinicians to employ, many procedures are still complicated by pain and discomfort. This can interfere with procedure success and can limit patient satisfaction. This review examines the evidence for pain control strategies for people undergoing non-surgical pleural procedures. A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify published studies examining different pain control strategies including pharmacological (sedatives, paravertebral blocks, erector spinae blocks, intrapleural anaesthesia, epidural anaesthesia, local anaesthetic, methoxyflurane, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids) and non-pharmacological measures (transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation [TENS], cold application and changes to the intervention or technique). Current literature is limited by heterogeneous study design, small participant numbers and use of different endpoints. Strategies that were more effective than placebo or standard care at improving pain included intrapleural local anaesthesia, paravertebral blocks, NSAIDs, small-bore intercostal catheters (ICC), cold application and TENS. Inhaled methoxyflurane, thoracic epidural anaesthesia and erector spinae blocks may also be useful approaches but require further evaluation to determine their roles in routine non-surgical pleural procedures. Future research should utilise reliable and repeatable study designs and reach consensus in endpoints to allow comparability between findings and thus provide the evidence-base to achieve standardisation of pain management approaches.

Efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for pain control during water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) for benign prostatic enlargement.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of low dose methoxyflurane disposable inhaler (Penthrox) was assessed in this study of men undergoing Rezum water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open-labeled, single-center study was conducted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of using methoxyflurane inhaler during a Rezum procedure. Patients assessed current pain intensity using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Pain at 4 timepoints including (1) before any medication, (2) initially after insertion of the rigid cystoscope and before any Rezum treatment, (3) immediately after final injection of Rezum treatment and (4) at discharge. Patients were asked to fill out the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM 1.4) and one question about pain relief at discharge. Treating physician also completed the TSQM 1.4. RESULTS: Ten patients were recruited. Median prostate volume was 53.4 cc (range 24-158 cc). Patients received a median of 10.5 Rezum injections, with a median procedure time of 4.5 minutes. Median VAS scores were 0, 0.1, 0 (primary efficacy outcome) and 0 (out of scale of 10) at the 4 timepoints, respectively. TSQM scores on effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global median satisfaction rated by patients were respectively 69.4, 100.0, 77.8 and 82.1 (out of scale of 100). Treatment satisfaction on pain relief was rated as 4.0 (very good). There were no observed adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane inhaler (Penthrox) was low cost, rapid, feasible and easy to administer as a pain management strategy for Rezum therapy. Further data from a larger comparative study will be conducted.

Prevalence and Perinatal Outcomes Following In Utero Exposure to Prehospital Emergency Methoxyflurane: A 17-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of exposure and perinatal outcomes associated with in utero exposure to methoxyflurane. DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION: Whole-population ambulance data in Western Australia (WA) were linked to the statutory perinatal data collection to identify pregnant women transferred by ambulance between 2000 and 2016. The proportion of neonates in WA exposed to methoxyflurane, fentanyl or no analgesia during an ambulance transfer was calculated. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies exposed to methoxyflurane (n=1579) were compared to those exposed to fentanyl (n=203) or no analgesia (n=10524) using multivariable logistic regression modelling. Perinatal outcomes were considered overall and by trimester of exposure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the prevalence of in utero methoxyflurane exposure and Apgar score on the day of delivery. RESULTS: In the study period, 0.4% of all neonates born in WA were exposed to methoxyflurane in utero. Methoxyflurane exposure on the day of delivery (n=657) was not associated with an increased likelihood of a low Apgar score at five minutes compared with no analgesia (n=2667) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.91-1.67). Whereas fentanyl exposure (n=22) was associated with an increased likelihood of low Apgar score compared with methoxyflurane (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.18-11.48). CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane is commonly used by ambulance services to treat pain in pregnant women in WA. While not recommended for use in pregnancy, pregnancies exposed to methoxyflurane did not have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in this study.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate clinical benefits and economic costs of inhaled methoxyflurane when used by ambulance staff for prehospital emergency patients with trauma. Comparison is to usual analgesic practice (UAP) in the UK in which patient records were selected if treatment had been with Entonox® or intravenous morphine or intravenous paracetamol. METHODS: Over a 12-month evaluation period, verbal numerical pain scores (VNPS) were gathered from adults with moderate to severe trauma pain attended by ambulance staff trained in administering and supplied with methoxyflurane. Control VNPS were obtained from ambulance database records of UAP in similar patients for the same period. Statistical modelling enabled comparisons of methoxyflurane to UAP, where we employed an Ordered Probit panel regression model for pain, linked by observational rules to VNPS. RESULTS: Overall, 96 trained paramedics and technicians from the East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (EMAS) prepared 510 doses of methoxyflurane for administration to a total of 483 patients. Comparison data extracted from the EMAS database of UAP episodes involved: 753 patients using Entonox®, 802 patients using intravenous morphine, and 278 patients using intravenous paracetamol. Modelling results included demonstration of faster pain relief with inhaled methoxyflurane (all p-values < 0.001). Methoxyflurane's time to achieve maximum pain relief was estimated to be significantly shorter: 26.4 min (95%CI 25.0-27.8) versus Entonox® 44.4 min (95%CI 39.5-49.3); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.0-27.9) versus intravenous morphine 41.8 min (95%CI 38.9-44.7); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.1-28.0) versus intravenous paracetamol 40.8 (95%CI 34.7-46.9). Scenario analyses showed that durations spent in severe pain were significantly less for methoxyflurane. Costing scenarios showed the added benefits of methoxyflurane were achieved at higher cost, eg versus Entonox® the additional cost per treated patient was estimated to be £12.30. CONCLUSION: When administered to adults with moderate or severe pain due to trauma inhaled methoxyflurane reduced pain more rapidly and to a greater extent than Entonox® and parenteral analgesics. Inclusion of inhaled methoxyflurane to the suite of prehospital analgesics provides a clinically useful addition, but one that is costlier per treated patient.

Trauma pain management in the emergency department: use of methoxyflurane as a patient-administered analgesic.

Evidence suggests that pain is highly prevalent among patients with traumatic injuries who attend emergency departments (EDs), yet accurate assessment and management of patients with acute pain can be challenging in this setting. Effective and rapid pain management is beneficial for patients and can support timely discharge from the ED, which is particularly important in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This article describes a service development project that introduced the use of a patient-administered analgesic, methoxyflurane, for patients with traumatic injuries with moderate to severe pain in one ED. The author outlines the benefits and rationale for using methoxyflurane as a first-line analgesic in this patient group and describes the main elements of training sessions for emergency nurses and other ED clinicians in the administration and supervision of patient-administered methoxyflurane.

Usability and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane for prehospital analgesia - a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Pain relief in the prehospital setting is often insufficient, as the administration of potent intravenous analgesic drugs is mostly reserved to physicians. In Australia, inhaled methoxyflurane has been in routine use by paramedics for decades, but experience in Central European countries is lacking. Thus, we aimed to assess whether user friendliness and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane as sole analgesic match the specific capabilities of local ground and air-based EMS systems in Austria. METHODS: Observational study in adult trauma patients (e.g. dislocations, fracture or low back pain following minor trauma) with moderate to severe pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] ≥4). Included patients received a Penthrop® inhaler containing 3 mL of methoxyflurane (maximum use 30 min). When pain relief was considered insufficient (NRS reduction < 3 after 10 min), intravenous analgesics were administered by an emergency physician. The primary endpoint was effectiveness of methoxyflurane as sole analgesic for transport of patients. Secondary endpoints were user friendliness (EMS personell), time to pain relief, vital parameters, side effects, and satisfaction of patients. RESULTS: Median numeric pain rating was 8.0 (7.0-8.0) in 109 patients. Sufficient analgesia (reduction of NRS ≥3) was achieved by inhaled methoxyflurane alone in 67 patients (61%). The analgesic effect was progressively better with increasing age. Side effects were frequent (n = 58, 53%) but mild. User satisfaction was scored as very good when pain relief was sufficient, but fair in patients without benefit. Technical problems were observed in 16 cases (14.7%), mainly related to filling of the inhaler. In every fifth use, the fruity smell of methoxyflurane was experienced as unpleasant. No negative effects on vital signs were observed. CONCLUSION: In prehospital use, inhaled methoxyflurane as sole analgesic is effective for transport of trauma patients (62%) with moderate to severe pain. Older patients benefit especially from inhaled methoxyflurane. Side effects are mild and vital parameters unaffected. Thus, inhaled methoxyflurane could be a valuable device for non-physician EMS personnel rescue services also in the central Europe region.

[Volatile anesthetics for prehospital analgesia by paramedics-An overview]. / Volatile Anästhetika zur präklinischen Analgesie durch Rettungssanitäter ­ Eine Übersicht.

Treatment of acute pain is a central task in emergency medicine. Yet, prehospital pain relief is often insufficient or delayed since the administration of potent intravenous analgesic drugs (such as opioids) is mostly limited to physicians due to legal restrictions or training deficiencies in Germany and Austria. Frequently, prehospitally operating emergency physicians have to be demanded later for anguished patients limiting disposability of physicians for patients who are in a potentially life-threatening condition. Thus, inhaled analgesics could represent an interesting alternative.A mixture of 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen (N2O, Livopan®) has been available in Germany and Austria for several years; however, prehospital use of Livopan has been merely realized and only one trial has been published. In addition, methoxyflurane (Penthrop®), a volatile anesthetic from the group of the dialkyl esters (2-dichloro-1:1-difluoroethyl-methyl-ester) was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe pain following trauma in adults in many European countries in recent years and was brought onto the market in Austria in 2018. Several in-hospital trials demonstrated high effectiveness in this setting.This article discusses the effects and prehospital areas of application of both substances in the light of the existing literature. We provide a narrative overview of the current study situation and report on a recently performed prehospital application study of methoxyflurane (Penthrop®) from Austria.The need for pressurized gas cylinders for the use of N2O represents a certain limitation in prehospital use. Furthermore, in certain injuries such as of the inner ear or a pneumothorax N2O should not be used and the risk of diffusion hypoxemia has to be addressed. Users should be particularly careful and limit the use in alcohol addicts and vegans. The advances of N2O are that it is odorless, has a fast onset of action, the usability in patients over 1 month old and has stabilizing effects on the circulation. Plenty of literature regarding prehospital as well as in-hospital use of nitrous oxide in emergency, obstetric and pediatric settings show its effectiveness as a single drug as well as in combination with other analgesics, such as paracetamol or various opioids. Its long tradition in Anglo-American countries is also based on its safety and low rate of side effects.Methoxyflurane is easier to store and handle and may be slightly more effective in severe pain after trauma; however, its approval is restricted to adults, where it works significantly better with increasing age, based on the declining minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of all inhaled anesthetics with increasing age. Furthermore, decades of use of inhaled methoxyflurane in Australia have shown the drug is effective, safe and low in side effects and has a broad spectrum of applications. The use of methoxyflurane is limited in patients with severe hepatic or renal insufficiency and the characteristic odor has been described as unpleasant by some patients. In Europe, three large in-hospital trials showed strong pain relief in trauma patients, even comparable to opioids.Overall, based on the current evidence, the use of nitrous oxide and even more of methoxyflurane may be recommended also for prehospital use by skilled paramedics.

'Pain-free TRUS B': a phase 3 double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of methoxyflurane with periprostatic local anaesthesia to reduce the discomfort of transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (ANZUP 1501).

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of inhaled methoxyflurane to periprostatic infiltration of local anaesthetic (PILA) during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies (TRUSBs) improved pain and other aspects of the experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial, involving 420 men undergoing their first TRUSB. The intervention was PILA plus a patient-controlled device containing either 3 mL methoxyflurane, or 3 mL 0.9% saline plus one drop of methoxyflurane to preserve blinding. The primary outcome was the pain score (0-10) reported by the participant after 15 min. Secondary outcomes included ratings of other aspects of the biopsy experience, willingness to undergo future biopsies, urologists' ratings, biopsy completion, and adverse events. RESULTS: The mean (SE) pain scores 15 min after TRUSB were 2.51 (0.22) in those assigned methoxyflurane vs 2.82 (0.22) for placebo (difference 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.75 to 0.14; P = 0.18). Methoxyflurane was associated with better scores for discomfort (difference -0.48, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.03; P = 0.035, adjusted [adj.] P = 0.076), whole experience (difference -0.50, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.08; P = 0.021, adj. P = 0.053), and willingness to undergo repeat biopsies (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.12-2.49; P = 0.01) than placebo. Methoxyflurane resulted in higher scores for drowsiness (difference +1.64, 95% CI 1.21-2.07; P < 0.001, adj. P < 0.001) and dizziness (difference +1.78, 95% CI 1.31-2.24; P < 0.001, adj. P < 0.001) than placebo. There was no significant difference in the number of ≥ grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that methoxyflurane improved pain scores at 15 min, however, improvements were seen in patient-reported discomfort, overall experience, and willingness to undergo repeat biopsies.

Frequency and duration of ambulance officer exposure to nitrous oxide and methoxyflurane in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: Nitrous oxide (Entonox®) and methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) are inhaled analgesics administered in paramedicine. Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide has been associated with negative health effects, and may inhibit professional capability. The effect of occupational exposure to methoxyflurane has not yet been clearly determined. This study identifies the frequency and duration of ambulance officer (AO) occupational exposure to nitrous oxide and methoxyflurane to provide a foundation for future assessments of occupational toxicity risk. METHODS: A retrospective database review of Patient Report Forms (PRFs) in 11 months between February 2016 and February 2018 was conducted. Nitrous oxide was available for the first 5 months studied, followed by 6 months methoxyflurane availability. AO-specific measures of attendance, rate of inhaled analgesic use, and duration of analgesic use were determined. Subgroup analysis by AO qualification and rostered work hours was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 46,759 PRFs were examined, identifying 1,033 cases of nitrous oxide administration and 1456 cases of methoxyflurane was administration. There was a significant increase in the proportion of cases where inhaled analgesia was administered following the replacement of nitrous oxide with methoxyflurane. Relative risk of exposure to methoxyflurane compared with nitrous oxide was 1.22, while median duration of each exposure remained unchanged (32 vs. 33 min). CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane via the Penthrox® inhaler was more likely to be administered than nitrous oxide. Most AOs are infrequently exposed to inhaled analgesics and are exposed for durations slightly greater than previously reported. Relative risk of exposure was greatest for lower-qualified AOs. Peak number of exposures and duration values suggest a subset of AOs with higher occupational health risk.

Serum fluoride levels in ambulance staff after commencement of methoxyflurane administration compared to meta-analysis results for the general public.

OBJECTIVES: Ambulance officers administering methoxyflurane as an inhalational analgesic may be exposed to trace vapor. Fluoride is a methoxyflurane metabolite, and has been associated with acute renal failure in anesthesia patients and skeletal fluorosis with chronic elevated serum levels from other sources. However, there has been no direct measurement of serum fluoride in occupationally exposed ambulance officers. Thus, this study directly measures serum fluoride over a prolonged period in order to determine renal toxic and skeletal fluorosis risk to ambulance officers who are administering methoxyflurane. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum inorganic fluoride concentrations were measured in a prospective observational study of 12 emergency medical technicians (EMTs). The study took 7 serum fluoride measurements over 24 months. A meta-analysis of healthy adult serum fluoride ranges was also conducted. RESULTS: The typical healthy adult serum fluoride range was determined to be 0.21-2.11 µmol/l (p < 0.001). The EMTs' baseline median (IQR) serum fluoride concentrations were 0.4 µmol/l (0.2; 1.0) with maximum 1.6 µmol/l. The EMTs' overall median serum fluoride was 0.4 µmol/l (0.2; 1.3) with maximum 4.0 µmol/l, usually within healthy reference ranges. All results were ≤10% of the suggested single-dose renal toxic threshold. One result was above a threshold for skeletal fluorosis. The highest measured serum fluoride was 24% of the lowest level associated with radiologic evidence of fluorosis. There was no evidence overall of increasing serum fluoride levels. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that EMTs' exposure to methoxyflurane resulted in sustained increased serum fluoride. These results imply EMTs' occupational safety from acute renal toxicity when activated carbon filtration is used on patient exhalation. However, 1 serum fluoride result above a skeletal fluorosis threshold suggests that the risk of mild skeletal fluorosis cannot be excluded. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(6):767-77.

Methoxyflurane toxicity: historical determination and lessons for modern patient and occupational exposure.

AIM: Historically methoxyflurane was used for anaesthesia. Evidence of nephrotoxicity led to abandonment of this application. Subsequently, methoxyflurane, in lower doses, has re-emerged as an analgesic agent, typically used via the Penthrox inhaler in the ambulance setting. We review the literature to consider patient and occupational risks for methoxyflurane. METHOD: Articles were located via PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Anesthesiology journal and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Early studies investigated pharmacokinetics and considered the resulting effects to pose minimal risk. Pre-clinical rodent studies utilised a species not vulnerable to the nephrotoxic fluoride metabolite of methoxyflurane, so nephrotoxicity was not identified until almost a decade after its introduction, and was initially met with scepticism. Further evidence of nephrotoxicity led to abandonment of methoxyflurane use for anaesthesia. Subsequent research suggested there are additional risks potentially relevant to recurrent patient or occupational exposure. Specifically, greater than expected fluoride production after repeated low-dose exposure, increased fluoride production due to medication-caused hepatic enzyme induction, fluoride deposition in bone potentially acting as a slow-release fluoride compartment, which suggests a risk of skeletal fluorosis, and hepatotoxicity. Gestational risk is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane poses a potentially substantial health risk in high (anaesthetic) doses, and there are a number of pathways whereby repeated exposure to methoxyflurane in lower doses may pose a risk. Single analgesic doses in modern use generally appear safe for patients. However, the safety of recurrent patient or occupational healthcare-worker exposure has not been confirmed, and merits further investigation.

Determination of equi-analgesic doses of inhaled methoxyflurane versus intravenous fentanyl using the cold pressor test in volunteers: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled methoxyflurane for acute pain relief has demonstrated an analgesic effect superior to placebo. Data comparing methoxyflurane to an opioid are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the equi-analgesic doses of inhaled methoxyflurane vs i.v. fentanyl. Both drugs have an onset within minutes and an analgesic effect of 20-30 min. METHODS: Twelve subjects were included in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study with four treatments: placebo (NaCl 0.9%), fentanyl 25 µg i.v., fentanyl 50 µg i.v., or inhaled methoxyflurane 3 ml. The subjects reported pain intensity using the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) from 0 to 10 during the cold pressor test (CPT). The CPT was performed before (CPT 1), 5 min (CPT 2), and 20 min (CPT 3) after drug administration. RESULTS: Inhaled methoxyflurane and fentanyl 25 µg reduced VNRS scores significantly compared with placebo at CPT 2 (-1.14 [estimated difference in VNRS between treatment groups with 95% confidence interval {CI}: -1.50 to -0.78]; -1.15 [95% CI: -1.51 to -0.79]; both P<0.001) and CPT 3 (-0.60 [95% CI: -0.96 to -0.24]; -0.84 [95% CI: -1.20 to -0.47]; both P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two drugs. Methoxyflurane had significantly higher VNRS scores than fentanyl 50 µg at CPT 2 (0.90 [95% CI: 0.54-1.26]; P<0.001) and CPT 3 (0.57 [95% CI: 0.21-0.94]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled methoxyflurane 3 ml was equi-analgesic to fentanyl 25 µg i.v. at CPT 2. Both resulted in significantly less pain than placebo. Fentanyl 50 µg i.v. demonstrated analgesia superior to methoxyflurane. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03894800.

ANalgesic Efficacy and safety of MOrphiNe versus methoxyflurane in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the rationale and design of the ANEMON-SIRIO 3 study: a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The unfavourable influence of morphine on the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor resulting in weaker and retarded antiplatelet effect in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been previously shown. Replacing morphine with methoxyflurane, a potent, non-opioid analgesic agent, that does not weaken or delay the effect of antiplatelet agents may improve the clinical efficacy of treatment of patients with ACS. METHODS: The ANEMON-SIRIO 3 study was designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised clinical trial aimed to test the analgesic efficacy and safety of methoxyflurane in patients with ACS. The study population will comprise patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST-elevation ACS admitted to the study centres with typical chest pain requiring analgesic treatment. Before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the patients with index ACS will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive methoxyflurane administered by inhalation, or to obtain morphine administered intravenously. Analgesic treatment will be followed by 300 mg loading dose of aspirin and 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. Patients will be assessed with regard to pain intensity according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale at baseline, 3 min after study drug administration and immediately after PCI. Moreover, patients will be actively monitored with regard to the occurrence of side effects of evaluated therapies, as well as adverse events that may be related to insufficient platelet inhibition (no-reflow phenomenon assessed immediately after PCI, administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during PCI, acute stent thrombosis). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in six Polish clinical centres from the beginning of in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04476173.

Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for analgesia in trauma: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: More than 75% of patients presenting to the Emergency Department are suffering symptoms of pain. Despite this, 67% will not receive any analgesia. Methoxyflurane is a fluorinated hydrocarbon gas which has analgesic properties when inhaled. Penthrox is a methoxyflurane autoinhaler recently licenced in Europe. Its ease of administration, safety, and fast onset of action make it of particular relevance to emergency medicine. Additionally, outside the hospital, it has the advantage of increased temperature stability and portability over current standard care. New evidence of its efficacy is emerging; however, currently, its use in Europe is not widespread. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence on inhaled methoxyflurane to determine if it is a superior analgesia in the acute trauma setting. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomised controlled trials, comparing inhaled methoxyflurane and either placebo or standard care. A comprehensive search will be conducted from database inception onwards in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL database, concurrent with a search of the grey literature for other relevant studies, including clinical trial databases. Only randomised controlled trials will be included. No limitations will be imposed on publication status or language of publication. The primary outcome will be mean difference in patient-reported pain at time points within the first 30 min of administration. Secondary outcomes will be mean difference in time to clinically significant pain relief and relative risk of adverse effects. Two reviewers will independently screen all returned studies and collect data. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third reviewer. Individual study methodological quality will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis; if this is not possible, we will construct a narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if inhaled methoxyflurane is a superior analgesia to standard care in the acute trauma setting. This knowledge will directly impact emergency care in the UK and worldwide and may require amendments to European pain relief guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020189119 .