In-bag abdominal manual morcellation versus contained power morcellation in laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes and costs.

BACKGROUND: To compare the surgical outcomes and costs of in-bag abdominal manual morcellation (AMM) and contained power morcellation (PM) in laparoscopic myomectomy. METHODS: A total of 61 patients were divided into two groups based on their myomectomy specimen extraction methods: AMM group (n = 33) and electromechanical contained PM group (n = 28). The surgical outcomes and cost were compared between groups. During AMM, a glove bag (in 27 patients) and an endo bag were used (in 6 patients) according to the myoma size. RESULTS: Morcellation time (18 ± 9.2 min vs. 37.4 ± 14.1 min) and total operation time (100 ± 24.3 min vs. 127 ± 33.1 min) were significantly lower in the AMM group compared to those in the PM group. Other surgical outcomes, which were similar between groups, included delta hemoglobin, length of hospital stay and VAS score at 12 and 24 h postoperatively. There were no per- or postoperative complications in both group with no conversion to laparotomy. One patient was transfused with two units of erythrocyte suspension postoperatively in the PM group. Sarcoma was not diagnosed in any of the cases in both group. CONCLUSION: The in-bag AMM or contained PM for specimen extraction resulted in similar outcomes in terms of delta hemoglobin, postoperative pain intensity (VAS score at 12 and 24 h postoperatively), the need for additional analgesia, and the length of hospital stay; however, total operation time and morcellation time were significantly shorter in the AMM group, indicating a prominent advantage. Significant cost-effectiveness is also a critical advantage of in-bag AMM compared to containing PM.

An intrauterine cavity morcellator: A novel approach to high volume uterus morcellation. Ex-vivo study.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine size is one of the essential factors determining the feasibility of a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery approach. A traditional electromechanical morcellator is a well-known tool but not without flaws. We aim to assess feasibility and safety of a novel intrauterine power morcellation device for uterine size reduction to overcome these limitations during hysterectomy. METHODS: This single-arm, observational study was conducted in a single tertiary care medical center from April 2022 to July 2022. Feasibility and safety of a novel intrauterine morcellation device for uterine size reduction was tested in ten post-hysterectomy uteri (Ex-vivo). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ten uteri were examined in this trial. No major complications occurred during the procedure. All ten (10) uteri were successfully reduced in size (size reduction range was between 9% to 54%). The average resection time using the Heracure Device was 4.3 minutes (range: 1min- 10min). Mean uterus weight reduction was 21%, with a mean circumference reduction of 25%. No leakage was observed from the outer surface of the uterus/serosa after the saline injection post-procedure examination. CONCLUSION: In this novel experiment, we verified the feasibility and safety of the Heracure device for vaginal intra-uterine morcellation for uterine size reduction. This technique could enable rapid and easy removal of the uterus through the vaginal orifice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Number Identifier: NCT05332132.

Manual morcellation (Resectr™ 9Fr) vs electromechanical morcellation (TruClear™) for hysteroscopic polypectomy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: Meta-analyses comparing hysteroscopic electromechanical morcellation with electrosurgical resection showed a shorter operating time for electromechanical morcellation, mainly for polypectomy. The Resectr™ 9Fr is a new hysteroscopic manual morcellator, designed to simplify this procedure. We aimed to compare manual with electromechanical morcellation for hysteroscopic polypectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This two-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was performed from 2018 to 2021 in the Catharina Hospital and the Ghent University Hospital. The study was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (NL6922; ICTRP ID: NTR7118). One hundred and forty women with polyps (between 8 and 20 mm) scheduled for hysteroscopic removal were randomized between manual (Resectr™ 9Fr) or electromechanical (TruClear™) morcellation. The primary outcome was time (instrumentation set-up, resection, and total procedure time). RESULTS: The non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome time was 1.3. Mean instrumentation set-up time was 10% shorter with the manual compared with the electromechanical morcellator (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 0.9; 97.5% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.1). Mean resection time was 30% longer with the manual compared with the motor-driven system (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 1.3; 97.5% CI 0.9-1.9). Mean total procedure time was 10% longer with the manual compared with the electromechanical morcellator (estimated mean ratio manual/electromechanical = 1.1; 95% CI 0.91-1.298). The estimated odds (electromechanical/manual) of better surgeon's safety, effective and comfort scores were, respectively, 4.5 (95% CI 0.9-22.1), 7.0 (95% CI 1.5-31.9), and 5.9 (95% CI 1.1-30.3) times higher with the motor-driven compared with the manual morcellator. Conversion rates and incomplete resection rates were comparable in both groups (manual vs electromechanical) (7.6% [4/66] vs 2.9% [2/68] and 6.1% [4/66] vs 3.0% [2/66], respectively). No intraoperative and postoperative complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The manual morcellator was non-inferior to the electromechanical morcellator for hysteroscopic polypectomy in terms of mean instrumentation set-up time and total procedure time. Results on resection time were inconclusive. Conversion and incomplete resection rates were within the range reported in the literature. Surgeon's reported rating for both devices was high, however, in favor of the motor-driven tissue removal system.

Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy followed by in-bag transvaginal corpus uteri morcellation and extraction: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) is a possible treatment for patients with benign uterine disease. Once the hysterectomy has been completed, morcellation and extraction of the corpus uteri is a crucial step of the procedure. We here present a case series to evaluate the feasibility of the in-bag transvaginal specimen retrieval following LSH. STUDY DESIGN: We report a case series of consecutive patients who underwent LSH followed by in-bag transvaginal specimen retrieval. LSH was accomplished in a standard fashion. Once the uterus was detached from the cervix, a 2 cm posterior colpotomy was performed laparoscopically with a monopolar hook under direct view to insert a specimen retrieval bag into the abdomen. The corpus uteri was placed into the bag and transvaginal contained manual morcellation was performed. The colpotomy was then sutured transvaginally. Baseline patients' characteristics and surgical data were collected. Postoperative complications, same-hospital readmissions, and reoperations were registered if occurred within 30 days from surgery. RESULTS: Patients' median age and BMI were 45,5 and 22,7, respectively. Median operative time was 71.5 min (range 34-143) and uterus weight ranged from 60 g to 470 g (median 210 g). The estimated blood loss was 100 mL (median) and no blood transfusion was required. No conversions to open surgery, nor intraoperative complications occurred. Median hospital stay was 2 days (1-3) and no postoperative complications within 30 days from surgery were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: LSH followed by in-bag transvaginal specimen extraction is a promising technique and might be considered a reliable and safe option to further reduce the invasiveness of the procedure.

Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.

Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.

The role of power morcellation in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize recent data and knowledge of laparoscopic power morcellation. METHODS: Review of articles. RESULTS: Laparoscopic morcellation has been introduced to gynecologic surgery in 90s. In 2014, Food and Drug Administration announced negative statement about the morcellation use due to the risk of potential spreading of malignant tumor cells. This statement reduced utilization of morcellation, especially in the United States. Since that, many health institutions and organizations started new researches focused on the safety of this surgical technique. After a couple of years, the morcellation is considered as a useful tool if certain rules are followed. CONCLUSION: Morcellation has a place in laparoscopic operative procedures even in 2022, in condition of correct selection of patients and possible utilization of contained in-bag morcellation.

Vaginal transisthmic myomectomy: a step by step video tutorial.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a video tutorial on vaginal transisthmic myomectomy in women with large submucosal fibroids. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the technique, with a narrated video footage. SETTING: Submucosal fibroids protrude into the uterine cavity and can cause numerous symptoms, including abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, subfertility, and obstetric complications. Over the last decades, hysteroscopic resection has become the preferred surgical approach for submucosal fibroids because it provides significant advantages regarding perioperative morbidity and postoperative recovery time when compared with laparotomy or laparoscopy with complete transection of the uterine wall. However, in large or multiple fibroids, longer surgery durations of hysteroscopic resection can lead to higher complication rates and incomplete resection. In some cases, hysteroscopic resection might even be impossible to perform. Furthermore, in many regions, special equipment for hysteroscopic myomectomy might not be available. Herein, we present a minimally invasive surgical alternative for approaching submucosal fibroids. PATIENT(S): A 26-year-old woman presenting with hypermenorrhea and dysmenorrhea (on a numeric rating scale from 0-10) caused by a recurrent International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) type 0 fibroid measuring 5 cm in diameter. INTERVENTION(S): Vaginal transisthmic myomectomy performed with a longitudinal transection of the uterine cervix and isthmus, morcellation of the fibroid with a scalpel, and multilayer reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vaginal transisthmic myomectomy is a fast and relatively simple, minimally invasive surgical technique suitable for large or multiple FIGO 0 and some FIGO 1 fibroids, necessitating the use of only basic surgical equipment. RESULT(S): Vaginal transisthmic myomectomy provides an additional minimally invasive surgical approach for submucosal fibroids. CONCLUSION(S): This surgical option for selected patients may help prevent complications resulting from prolonged hysteroscopic surgery, repeated hysteroscopic procedures owing to incomplete resection, and the morbidity of transabdominal approaches for myomectomy. With this video, we aim to expedite the clinical learning curve of this technique, which should be investigated on a broader scale in the future.

Being the ultimate travel companion of a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Uterine fibroids are difficult to distinguish from malignant masses using standard ultrasonography; and morcellation carries the risk of disseminating occult cancer in a small but relevant group of women with an undetected uterine malignancy. In this context, we follow the progress of a woman diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma after suboptimal initial surgery for an assumed fibroid. Evidence is reviewed that guided multidisciplinary tumor board decisions about optimal management approaches after local seeding and development of distant metastases, and informed treatment selection at each line of therapy. As the case study illustrates, choice of treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcomas frequently involves finding an appropriate balance between the efficacy and toxicity of available options, aiming to allow patients to maintain their normal lives.

Containment Bag Use Among Women Who Undergo Hysterectomy With Laparoscopic Power Morcellation.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate trends in use of laparoscopic power morcellators in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy and to examine use of containment systems in these patients in relation to safety guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS: We examined data that were recorded in the Premier Healthcare Database from patients who underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy from 2010 to 2018. Patients were stratified based on use of laparoscopic power morcellators. The cohort was further stratified as either pre-FDA guidance (2010 quarter 1-2014 quarter 1) or post-FDA guidance (2014 quarter 2-2018 quarter 2). Interrupted time series analyses were performed to determine the effect of FDA guidance on the use of laparoscopic power morcellators and containment bags. RESULTS: Among 67,115 patients, laparoscopic power morcellator use decreased from 66.7% in 2013 quarter 4 to 13.3% by 2018 quarter 2. The likelihood of laparoscopic power morcellator use decreased by 9.5% for each quarter elapsed in the post-FDA warning period (risk ratio [RR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.91). Containment bag use rose from 5.2% in 2013 quarter 4 to 15.2% by 2018 quarter 2. The likelihood of containment bag use increased by 3% for each quarter elapsed in the post-FDA warning period (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05). Among women who had laparoscopic power morcellator use, uterine cancers or sarcomas were identified in 54 (0.17%) before the FDA guidance compared with seven (0.12%) after the guidance ( P =.45). Containment bags were used in 11.1% of women with uterine cancers or sarcomas before the FDA guidance compared with 14.3% after the guidance ( P =.12). The perioperative complication rate was 3.3% among women who had laparoscopic power morcellator use without a containment bag compared with 4.5% ( P =.001) in those with a containment bag (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.64). CONCLUSION: Use of laparoscopic power morcellators has decreased over time. Containment bag use increased after the FDA's 2014 guidance; however, most procedures employing laparoscopic power morcellators are still performed without a containment bag.

Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND Hysteroscopic surgery has been widely used in clinical practice for more than 30 years due to its advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, and direct vision. The aim of this study was to compare hysteroscopic morcellation versus conventional resectoscopy for removal of endometrial lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS For the database search, we used the keywords "morcellator," "morcellators," "morcellate," "morcellation," and "morcellated" combined with "hysteroscopy," "hysteroscopy," "uteroscope," and "transcervical". The last search was conducted on February 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS According to our retrieval scheme and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found 6 studies including 565 patients. For enumeration data, we calculated the effect size as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), while for quantitative data we used the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). There was no significant difference between success rate of hysteroscopic morcellation and conventional resectoscopy (relative risk and 95% confidence interval 1.05(0.97,1.13); P=0.232). Procedure time was also shorter with hysteroscopic morcellation, the procedure time of the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 3.43 min shorter compared with the conventional resectoscopy group, and the operating time in the hysteroscopic morcellation group was 2.81 min shorter. In terms of fluid deficit, there was no statistically significant difference in fluid loss between the 2 groups (P=0.209). CONCLUSIONS Hysteroscopic morcellation is associated with a shorter procedure time and operative time among patients with endometrial lesions compared with resectoscopy.

Uterine fibroids morcellation: a puzzle topic.

The laparoscopic approach for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma is increasingly practiced. The necessity to remove large specimens from the small laparoscopic incision has always been one of the main limits of this procedure. The unrestricted use of morcellation, to overtake this weak point of minimally invasive surgery, has opened in recent years a broad debate, especially on the risk of unintended dissemination of cells that could in some cases lead to extremely negative repercussions. This review analyzes these aspects and the principal recommendations from the major gynecological society on this topic surveying their effects. Furthermore, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the different morcellation techniques and how they are performed, evaluating their advantages and disadvantages. Contained morcellation seems to overcome many limits; however, based on recent data, an appropriate evaluation and selection of patients, as well as complete counseling before the surgery, are mandatory.

[Application of transvaginal morcellation within disposable extraction bag with traction wire in laparoscopic myomectomy].

To investigate the effect and clinical value of morcellation within disposable extraction bag with traction wire through posterior vaginal fornix in laparoscopic myomectomy. A total of 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation through posterior vaginal fornix in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from June 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. After the uterine fibroids were removed, the fibroids were placed into the extraction bag, tightening the mouth of the bag with a traction wire to make it airtight. After the uterine incisions were sutured, the extraction bag was taken out through the posterior fornix of the vagina, and the fibroids were broken up with a scalpel in the bag and taken out. The fibroids were successfully removed from the 42 patients through the posterior fornix of the vagina. There were no fibroids fragments found in the peritoneal cavity and vagina. There were no malignant cells or spindle cells found in the peritoneal lavage cytology before and after the operation. After filling the extraction bags with water, there was no leakage. There were 39 cases of uterine leiomyoma, 2 cases of cell-rich uterine leiomyoma, and 1 case of smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential in postoperative pathological diagnosis. Forty-two cases were followed up for 6 to 30 months. The posterior vaginal fornix incision healed well and there was no recurrence or metastasis. Morcellation within disposable extraction bag with traction wire through posterior vaginal fornix in laparoscopic myomectomy is a safe and feasible method for fibroids removal, which may help to reduce the dissemination of iatrogenic tumors.

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect and safety of Piranha and VersaCut morcellation devices in transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is reported to be widely used in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which consists of two procedures: enucleation and morcellation. This study is to examine the efficiency and safety of two different morcellator systems within a cohort of men undergoing HoLEP for BPH. METHODS: A total of 210 consecutive patients undergoing HoLEP and morcellation procedures were enrolled. Individuals were randomly divided into 2 separated groups: the first group (105 patients) was performed with a nephroscope using a mechanical Versacut morcellator and the second (105 patients) was performed with the new morcellation system, nephroscopes and Piranha morcellator. Perioperative characteristics were studied and analyzed. RESULTS: The morcellation time and the morcellation rate was similar when the prostate volume (PV) ≤ 60 mL while the morcellation time was significantly shorter and the morcellation rate was higher in the Piranha group with PV > 60 mL. No significant difference was observed according to the bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time, and discharge time. CONCLUSION: Piranha morcellator presents a higher efficiency for the prostate over 60 mL.

Incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma in a Turkish province: a retrospective multi-centre study in a low income setting.

The aim of the current study was to estimate the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma (LMS) in patients who underwent surgery due to leiomyomas in Konya province, and to contribute to the literature discussing comparisons with similar studies. The digital archives of eight high-volume hospitals were studied for surgeries performed due to leiomyomas between January 2012 and January 2019, and leiomyosarcoma incidence was calculated based on the data obtained. Twenty-one patients in 3703 cases were found to have unexpected leiomyosarcoma, which means we can expect one leiomyosarcoma in 176 (0.56%) surgeries. Six more malignant tumours were detected among the remaining cases. Thus, our study estimated the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma as 1/176 (0.56%), which is higher than most of the studies in the literature justifying the debate started by the FDA in 2014. As the tumour biology is not yet clear, and the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma tends to be so high, the key focus must be to try to detect uterine leiomyosarcomas preoperatively for robust patient care.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma varies widely from 1/498 to 1/8300 depending on the study method and the type of procedure, and there is still controversy, even after the FDA statement that led to a major restriction in laparoscopic surgeries due to concerns about inadvertent morcellation of leiomyosarcomas.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, the current study found the highest incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma, and consequently a serious evaluation of all patients undergoing surgery due to leiomyomas preoperatively considering a leiomyosarcoma candidate is recommended.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Studies on tumour biology and novel markers must be supported for accurate preoperative diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma.

A self-developed contained bag for laparoscopic myomectomy morcellation.

OBJECTIVES: Open power morcellation during a laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) can result in the dissemination of benign or occult malignant tumor cells in the abdominopelvic cavity. The development of a new contained collection bag for power morcellation is now favored by gynecologic surgeons worldwide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a single-arm trial comprising 20 women who consecutively underwent an LM involving the use of a newly designed contained collection bag for power morcellation between November 3rd 2017 and April 31st 2018. There was also a historical control group consisting of 30 women who underwent open power morcellation during an LM between May 1st 2017 and October 31st 2017. All the essential information concerning the patients and surgically related data, including the myoma size, the operation duration, and the cell count of the intraperitoneal irrigating fluid, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The uterus size and the maximum diameters of the uterus and the myoma of the two groups were not significantly different (p = 0.65, p = 0.71, and p = 0.31, respectively). Pseudopneumoperitoneum was established and clear visualization was guaranteed in all 20 cases in the experimental group. The remaining fragment tissue amount (mean ± SD) and weight (mean ± SD) in the collection bag after morcellation in the experimental group were 5.00 ± 1.48 and 3.87 ± 1.31 (g). All the collection bags were routinely examined after the LM using normal saline, and no leaks or lesions were found. The cell counts of the intraperitoneal irrigating fluid both before and after morcellation were less than 105-106/L. The pathology of all the tissues confirmed that there were no malignant tumors. The operation of the experimental group was 18 mins longer than that of the historical control group (p = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: This newly designed collection bag system for LM morcellation is effective, feasible, and safe.