Cronología del diagnóstico de la neurofibromatosis tipo 1 en la infancia / Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Diagnostic Timelines in Children

Antecedentes y objetivos El diagnóstico de la neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) plantea dificultades en niños sin antecedentes familiares durante la primera infancia. En este estudio pretendemos estimar la demora diagnóstica de los pacientes sin antecedentes familiares de NF1 y definir la repercusión de considerar las manchas café con leche y las efélides como un único criterio diagnóstico. Pacientes y métodos Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo en el que se revisaron los hitos diagnósticos de la NF1 en las historias clínicas de los pacientes menores de 18 años atendidos en nuestro centro. Distribuimos a los pacientes en dos grupos en función de la existencia de antecedentes de NF1 entre sus progenitores, considerando las manchas café con leche y las efélides como un único criterio y aceptando el estudio genético como criterio de confirmación en casos de elevada sospecha. Resultados Se incluyeron en el estudio 108 menores con diagnóstico de NF1. La edad media de diagnóstico en nuestra serie fue de 3,94 años (desviación estándar:±3,8 años). En el grupo 1, sin antecedentes, la edad media de diagnóstico fue de 4 años y 8 meses, mientras que en el grupo 2, con antecedentes, fue de 12 meses, siendo la demora en el diagnóstico de 3 años y 8 meses entre ambos grupos. Conclusión Las lesiones cutáneas representan, en la mayoría de los casos, las primeras manifestaciones clínicas de la enfermedad. Consideramos necesaria la actualización de los criterios diagnósticos del NIH con el fin de facilitar el diagnóstico en los primeros años de vida (AU)

background and objectives The neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) diagnosis is challenging in young children without a family history of NF1. The aims of this study were to estimate diagnostic delays in children without a family history of NF1 and to examine the effects of using café au lait macules and skin fold freckling as a single diagnostic criterion. Patients and methods Retrospective, descriptive, observational study of all patients diagnosed with NF1 before the age of 18 years who were seen at our hospital. The medical records of those included were reviewed to identify the date on which the diagnostic criteria of NF1 were objectified. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with a known parental history of NF1 and those without. Café au lait macules and skin fold freckling were assessed as a single diagnostic criterion, and genetic evidence was considered to confirm highly suspicious cases. Results We studied 108 patients younger than the age of 18 years with a diagnosis of NF1. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 3.94 (±3.8) years for the overall group, 1 year for patients with a parental history of NF1, and 4 years and 8 months for those without. Diagnosis was therefore delayed by 3 years and 8 months in patients without a family history. Conclusion Skin lesions were the first clinical manifestation of NF1 in most patients. We believe that the National Institutes of Health's diagnostic criteria for NF1 should be updated to aid diagnosis in young children (AU)

[Translated article] Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Diagnostic Timelines in Children / Cronología del diagnóstico de la neurofibromatosis tipo 1 en la infancia

background and objectives The neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) diagnosis is challenging in young children without a family history of NF1. The aims of this study were to estimate diagnostic delays in children without a family history of NF1 and to examine the effects of using café au lait macules and skin fold freckling as a single diagnostic criterion. Patients and methods Retrospective, descriptive, observational study of all patients diagnosed with NF1 before the age of 18 years who were seen at our hospital. The medical records of those included were reviewed to identify the date on which the diagnostic criteria of NF1 were objectified. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with a known parental history of NF1 and those without. Café au lait macules and skin fold freckling were assessed as a single diagnostic criterion, and genetic evidence was considered to confirm highly suspicious cases. Results We studied 108 patients younger than the age of 18 years with a diagnosis of NF1. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 3.94 (±3.8) years for the overall group, 1 year for patients with a parental history of NF1, and 4 years and 8 months for those without. Diagnosis was therefore delayed by 3 years and 8 months in patients without a family history. Conclusion Skin lesions were the first clinical manifestation of NF1 in most patients. We believe that the National Institutes of Health's diagnostic criteria for NF1 should be updated to aid diagnosis in young children (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos El diagnóstico de la neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) plantea dificultades en niños sin antecedentes familiares durante la primera infancia. En este estudio pretendemos estimar la demora diagnóstica de los pacientes sin antecedentes familiares de NF1 y definir la repercusión de considerar las manchas café con leche y las efélides como un único criterio diagnóstico. Pacientes y métodos Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo en el que se revisaron los hitos diagnósticos de la NF1 en las historias clínicas de los pacientes menores de 18 años atendidos en nuestro centro. Distribuimos a los pacientes en dos grupos en función de la existencia de antecedentes de NF1 entre sus progenitores, considerando las manchas café con leche y las efélides como un único criterio y aceptando el estudio genético como criterio de confirmación en casos de elevada sospecha. Resultados Se incluyeron en el estudio 108 menores con diagnóstico de NF1. La edad media de diagnóstico en nuestra serie fue de 3,94 años (desviación estándar:±3,8 años). En el grupo 1, sin antecedentes, la edad media de diagnóstico fue de 4 años y 8 meses, mientras que en el grupo 2, con antecedentes, fue de 12 meses, siendo la demora en el diagnóstico de 3 años y 8 meses entre ambos grupos. Conclusión Las lesiones cutáneas representan, en la mayoría de los casos, las primeras manifestaciones clínicas de la enfermedad. Consideramos necesaria la actualización de los criterios diagnósticos del NIH con el fin de facilitar el diagnóstico en los primeros años de vida (AU)

Neurofibromatosis type 1-dependent alterations in mouse microglia function are not cell-intrinsic.

We previously discovered a sex-by-genotype defect in microglia function using a heterozygous germline knockout mouse model of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1 ± mice), in which only microglia from male Nf1 ± mice exhibited defects in purinergic signaling. Herein, we leveraged an unbiased proteomic approach to demonstrate that male, but not female, heterozygous Nf1 ± microglia exhibit differences in protein expression, which largely reflect pathways involved in cytoskeletal organization. In keeping with these predicted defects in cytoskeletal function, only male Nf1 ± microglia had reduced process arborization and surveillance capacity. To determine whether these microglial defects were cell autonomous or reflected adaptive responses to Nf1 heterozygosity in other cells in the brain, we generated conditional microglia Nf1-mutant knockout mice by intercrossing Nf1flox/flox with Cx3cr1-CreER mice (Nf1flox/wt; Cx3cr1-CreER mice, Nf1MG ± mice). Surprisingly, neither male nor female Nf1MG ± mouse microglia had impaired process arborization or surveillance capacity. In contrast, when Nf1 heterozygosity was generated in neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes by intercrossing Nf1flox/flox with hGFAP-Cre mice (Nf1flox/wt; hGFAP-Cre mice, Nf1GFAP ± mice), the microglia defects found in Nf1 ± mice were recapitulated. Collectively, these data reveal that Nf1 ± sexually dimorphic microglia abnormalities are likely not cell-intrinsic properties, but rather reflect a response to Nf1 heterozygosity in other brain cells.

Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cell Populations in the Teeth of Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 - Therapeutic Potential for Bone Tissue Engineering.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Neurofibromas (NF) are the most common benign nerve sheath tumors in the tongue, gingiva, major salivary glands, and jaw bones. Nowadays, tissue engineering is a revolutionary technique for reconstructing tissues. To explore the feasibility of using stem cells derived from NF teeth to treat orofacial bone defects, the differences in cell biological properties between an NF teeth group and Normal teeth group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The intra-dental pulp tissues from each tooth were extracted. The cell survival rates, morphology, proliferation rates, cell activity, and differentiation abilities were contrastively analyzed between the NF teeth group and Normal teeth group. RESULTS: Between the two groups, there were no differences in the primary generation (P0) cells (p>0.05), the cell yield, and the time required for the cells to grow out of the pulp tissue and attach to the culture plate. Furthermore, no differences were found at the first generation (passage) between the two groups in colony formation rate and cell survival rate. The proliferation capacity, cell growth curve, and surface marker expression of dental pulp cells was not altered in the third generation (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Dental pulp stem cells from NF teeth were successfully obtained and were not different from normal dental pulp stem cells. Although, clinical research using tissue-engineered bone to repair bone defects is still in its infancy, it will eventually enter the clinic and become a routine means of bone defect reconstruction treatment as related disciplines and technologies develop.

Co-occurrence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and pseudoachondroplasia - a first case report.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pseudoachondroplasia are both rare autosomal dominant disorders, caused by pathogenic mutations in NF1 and COMP genes, respectively. Both neurofibromin 1 and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) play a role in the development of the skeleton. Carrying both germline mutations has not been previously reported; however, it can affect the developing phenotype. CASE PRESENTATION: The index patient, an 8-year-old female presented with several skeletal and dermatologic anomalies resembling the coexistence of multiple syndromes. Her mother had dermatologic symptoms characteristic for neurofibromatosis type 1, and her father presented with distinct skeletal anomalies. NGS-based analysis revealed a heterozygous pathogenic mutation in genes NF1 and COMP in the index patient. A previously unreported heterozygous variant was detected for the NF1 gene. The sequencing of the COMP gene revealed a previously reported, pathogenic heterozygous variant that is responsible for the development of the pseudoachondroplasia phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present the case of a young female carrying pathogenic NF1 and COMP mutations, diagnosed with two distinct heritable disorders, neurofibromatosis type 1 and pseudoachondroplasia. The coincidence of two monogenic autosomal dominant disorders is rare and can pose a differential diagnostic challenge. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported co-occurrence of these syndromes.

Pigmented neurofibroma with hypertrichosis.

BACKGROUND: Pigmented (or melanocytic) neurofibroma (PN) constitutes only 1% of cases and is considered a rare variant of neurofibroma containing melanin-producing cells. In addition, the association of PN with hypertrichosis is infrequent. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of an 8-year-old male with a neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) diagnosis, who presented a light brown hyperpigmented plaque, smooth and well-demarcated, and hypertrichosis on the left thigh. The skin biopsy showed characteristics of neurofibroma; however, in the deep portion of the lesion, melanin deposits positive for S100, Melan-A, and HMB45 were observed, thus establishing the diagnosis of pigmented neurofibroma. CONCLUSIONS: Although PN is a rare subtype of neurofibroma, it is considered a chronically progressive benign tumor containing melanin-producing cells. These lesions can appear alone or in association with neurofibromatosis. Since this is a tumor that can be confused with other skin lesions, biopsy analysis is essential to differentiate it from other pigmented skin tumors, such as melanocytic schwannoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, neurocristic hamartoma, or neuronevus. Surveillance is part of the treatment, and surgical resection is sometimes performed.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El neurofibroma pigmentado (NP) o melanocítico constituye solamente el 1% de los casos y se considera como una variante rara del neurofibroma que contiene células productoras de melanina. Además, la asociación de NP con hipertricosis es muy rara. CASO CLÍNICO: Se describe el caso de un paciente de sexo masculino de 8 años 2 meses de edad con diagnóstico de neurofibromatosis tipo 1 (NF1), quien presentaba en la cara anterior del muslo izquierdo una placa hiperpigmentada de color café claro, bien delimitada y de consistencia suave, e hipertricosis. La biopsia de piel presentó cambios característicos de neurofibroma; sin embargo, en la porción profunda de la lesión se observaron depósitos de melanina positivos para S100, Melan-A y HMB45, con lo que se estableció el diagnóstico de neurofibroma pigmentado. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque el NP es un subtipo raro del neurofibroma, se considera que es un tumor benigno de evolución crónica de células productoras de melanina. Estas lesiones aparecen en solitario o asociadas con neurofibromatosis. Dado que es un tumor que puede confundirse con otras lesiones cutáneas, es fundamental el análisis de la biopsia para diferenciarlo de otros tumores cutáneos pigmentados, como el schwanoma melanocítico, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, hamartoma neurocrístico o neuronevus. La vigilancia es parte del tratamiento y, en ocasiones, se lleva a cabo la resección quirúrgica.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in a patient with Neurofibromatosis-1.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST) is an uncommon type of soft tissue tumour which most commonly arises in the setting of Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1) or in the presence of another nerve sheath tumour. NF-1 is an autosomal dominant syndrome which is diagnosed based on clinical criteria. People suffering from NF-1 are at a higher risk of developing tumours, especially MPNST. MPNST can occur anywhere along the distribution of nerve roots but most commonly involves the limbs and trunk. The prognosis of MPNST in the setting of NF-1 is grave as the distant metastasis develops earlier than non-syndromic cases. Pre-operative diagnosis is difficult as there is no gold standard radiologic technique or characteristic radiological features. The diagnosis is established after histological evaluation supplemented by immunohistochemistry of the tumour tissue. We present a case of a 38-year-old female, a known case of NF-1, who presented with a single, irregular, cystic swelling in the left flank which was increasing in size. The patient underwent complete surgical excision of a 6cm tumour which was diagnosed as MPNST after histopathological examination. The rare nature of this tumour makes the diagnosis and treatment extremely hard. Awareness regarding this disease should be increased so that proper treatment plans can be made.

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome and growth deficiency in an Iranian girl due to a pathogenic variant in NF1 gene.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in NF1 gene could cause allelic disorders with clinical spectrum of Neurofibromatosis type 1 to Noonan syndrome. Here, a 7-year-old Iranian girl is described with Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome due to a pathogenic variant in NF1 gene. METHODS: Clinical evaluations were performed along with genetic testing using whole exome sequencing (WES). The variant analysis including pathogenicity prediction was also done using bioinformatics tools. RESULTS: The chief compliant of the patient was short stature and lack of proper weight gain. Other symptoms were developmental delay, learning disability, inadequate speech skill, broad forehead, hypertelorism, and epicanthal folds, low set ears and webbed neck. A small deletion, c.4375-4377delGAA, was found in NF1 gene using WES. This variant was classified as pathogenic according to ACMG. CONCLUSIONS: NF1 variants may show variable phenotypes among the patients; identifying such variants is helpful in therapeutic management of the disease. WES is considered as an appropriate test to diagnose Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome.

Lymphomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): another malignancy in the NF1 syndrome?

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant multisystem syndrome caused by mutations in the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) gene that encodes for the protein neurofibromin acting as a tumour suppressor. Neurofibromin functions primarily as a GTPase-activating protein for the Ras family of oncogenes, which activates many signalling pathways for cell proliferation and differentiation; without neurofibromin, Ras is constitutively activated, thereby turning on many downstream signalling pathways related to oncogenesis. Patients with NF1 have a well known predisposition for certain types of malignancies including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, gliomas, and breast cancers, as well as a potential association of NF1 with lymphoproliferative disorders such as lymphomas. In this article, we review the pathophysiology and tumourigenesis of NF1, previously reported cases of cutaneous lymphomas in NF1 patients along with our case demonstration of a NF1-associated scalp B-cell lymphoma, and NF1-associated extra cutaneous lymphomas. The diagnosis of lymphomas particularly cutaneous lymphomas may be difficult in NF1 patients as they often have skin lesions and/or cutaneous/subcutaneous nodules or tumours like neurofibromas, which raises the possibility of underdiagnosed cutaneous lymphomas in NF1 patients. We also comprehensively discuss the association between NF1 and lymphomas. In summary, most studies support a potential association between NF1 and lymphomas. Further investigation is needed to clarify the association between NF1 and lymphomas in order to bring clinical awareness of possibly underdiagnosed NF1-associated lymphomas and individualised management of NF1 patients to practice.

Assessment of Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in a National Cohort of Children With a Neoplasm.

Importance: To improve diagnostics of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) in children with cancer, it is essential to evaluate the effect of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer and compare it with genetic testing based on clinical selection. However, a reliable comparison is difficult because recent reports on a phenotype-first approach in large, unselected childhood cancer cohorts are lacking. Objective: To describe a national children's cancer center's experience in diagnosing CPSs before introducing routine next-generation sequencing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the National Retinoblastoma Treatment Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology (Utrecht, Netherlands) and included Dutch pediatric patients with a new diagnosis of neoplasm between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Follow-up was at least 18 months after neoplasm diagnosis. Data analysis was conducted from July 2021 to February 2022. Exposures: As part of routine diagnostics, pediatric oncologists and ophthalmologists checked for characteristics of CPSs and selected children for referral to clinical geneticists and genetic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Detected cancer predisposition syndromes. Results: A total of 824 patients (median [range] age at diagnosis 7.5 [0-18.9] years; 361 girls [44%]) were assessed, including 335 children with a hematological neoplasm (41%) and 489 (59%) with a solid tumor. In 71 of 824 children (8.6%), a CPS was identified, of which most (96%) were identified by a phenotype-driven approach. Down syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 were the most common CPSs diagnosed. In 42 of 71 patients (59%), a CPS was identified after these children developed a neoplasm. The specific type of neoplasm was the most frequent indicator for genetic testing, whereas family history played a minor role. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of children with a neoplasm, the prevalence of CPSs identified by a phenotype-driven approach was 8.6%. The diagnostic approach for identifying CPSs is currently shifting toward a genotype-first approach. Future studies are needed to determine the diagnostic value, as well as possible disadvantages of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer compared with the phenotype-driven approach.

Identification of therapeutic sensitivities in a spheroid drug combination screen of Neurofibromatosis Type I associated High Grade Gliomas.

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) patients develop an array of benign and malignant tumors, of which Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST) and High Grade Gliomas (HGG) have a dismal prognosis. About 15-20% of individuals with NF1 develop brain tumors and one third of these occur outside of the optic pathway. These non-optic pathway gliomas are more likely to progress to malignancy, especially in adults. Despite their low frequency, high grade gliomas have a disproportional effect on the morbidity of NF1 patients. In vitro drug combination screens have not been performed on NF1-associated HGG, hindering our ability to develop informed clinical trials. Here we present the first in vitro drug combination screen (21 compounds alone or in combination with MEK or PI3K inhibitors) on the only human NF1 patient derived HGG cell line available and on three mouse glioma cell lines derived from the NF1-P53 genetically engineered mouse model, which sporadically develop HGG. These mouse glioma cell lines were never exposed to serum, grow as spheres and express markers that are consistent with an Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell (OPC) lineage origin. Importantly, even though the true cell of origin for HGG remains elusive, they are thought to arise from the OPC lineage. We evaluated drug sensitivities of the three murine glioma cell lines in a 3D spheroid growth assay, which more accurately reflects drug sensitivities in vivo. Excitingly, we identified six compounds targeting HDACs, BRD4, CHEK1, BMI-1, CDK1/2/5/9, and the proteasome that potently induced cell death in our NF1-associated HGG. Moreover, several of these inhibitors work synergistically with either MEK or PI3K inhibitors. This study forms the basis for further pre-clinical evaluation of promising targets, with an eventual hope to translate these to the clinic.

Inhibition of YAP Sensitizes the Selumetinib Treatment for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Related Plexiform Neurofibroma.

Background: Targeted therapy of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) related plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) aiming at MEK molecule has not demonstrated a convincing result for complete disease inhibition, probably due to other signal pathways crosstalk. Our previous study revealed an increased nuclear translocation of YAP molecule in NF1 related pNF. Herein, we decided to further investigate the therapeutic relations of YAP interference during the MEK treatment against NF1 related pNF. Methods: By means of selumetinib (MEK-inhibitor), RNA-sequencing was firstly performed to identify the changes of signal pathways in pNF Schwann cells, which was probably related to YAP regulation. Nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation and western blotting were performed to show the intracellular YAP changes under selumetinib treatment. Thirdly, a series of in vitro assays were performed including flow cytometry, CCK-8, and colony/sphere formation under dual treatment of selumetinib and verteporfin (YAP-inhibitor). In addition, Chou-Talalay method was adopted to evaluate the synergistic inhibiting effects of such drug combination. Xenograft study was also used to detect the combining effects in vivo. Results: RNA-sequencing revealed that selumetinib treatment might be associated with the undesirable activation of Hippo pathway in NF1 related pNF tumor cells, which might reduce its pharmaceutic effects. Next, nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation and further studies demonstrated that selumetinib could promote the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of YAP in vitro, which might cause the aforementioned resistance to selumetinib treatment. Additionally, when combined treatments were performed based on verteporfin and selumetinib, synergistic effects were observed on cytotoxicity of NF1 related pNF tumor cells in vitro and in vivo xenograft models. Conclusion: YAP inhibition can effectively sensitize NF1 related pNF tumor cells to selumetinib. Dual targeting of YAP and MEK might be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating NF1 related pNF.

Safety and Efficacy of Mek Inhibitors in the Treatment of Plexiform Neurofibromas: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Plexiform neurofibromas (PN) represent the main cause of morbidity in patients affected by Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Until recently, surgery has been the main treatment option in these patients, but it is burdened with a low efficacy rate and a high incidence of side effects as well as recurrence. In recent years, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) such as selumetinib and trametinib have shown great promise. METHODS: We retrospectively describe a single center cohort of NF1 patients affected by PN1 and treated with MEKi since 2019 to 2021. Patients recruited in the study were affected by PN that were not eligible to complete surgical excision, symptomatic or with major cosmetic deformation or functional neurological deficits. RESULTS: Most patients experienced improvement in clinical symptoms and quality of life, with reduction or stabilization of lesions. However, no complete response was achieved. The most common adverse effects involved the skin, affecting every patient. Importantly, no life-threatening adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, MEKi treatment has been shown to be both safe and effective in improving symptomatology and quality of life.

Synchronous cutaneous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor and jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and submucosal angiomyolipoma in type 1 neurofibromatosis: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) is one of the most prevalent genetic conditions. NF1 is characterized by cutaneous plexiform neurofibromas and café au lait skin pigmentation, and is inherited in an autosomal dominant trait with mutation in the neurofibromin 1 gene on chromosome 17. Neurofibromin is involved in Ras proto-oncogene regulation. Accordingly, NF1 may lead to malignancies, with a lifetime cancer risk of 60%. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is the leading cause of mortality due to NF1. The relevance of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in NF1 is increasingly being reported in the literature and NF1-associated GIST has been identified to have an alternative molecular pathogenesis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 62-years-old female had a 7 × 5 cm growing back mass in the background of various sized cutaneous neurofibromas with café au lait spots. Computed tomography performed in the workup revealed a 4.1 cm enhancing mass near the ileal mesentery. DIAGNOSES: NF1 affected by cutaneous MPNST of the back, and synchronous GIST and submucosal angiomyolipoma (AML) of the jejunum. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent laparoscopic jejunal mass excision, and excision and flap coverage for the back mass owing to the suspicion of multiple MPNSTs. However, the abdominal masses were diagnosed as GIST and AML following confirmation of the immunohistochemical profiles. Accordingly, the patient was administered adjuvant radiotherapy to the MPNST after surgery. OUTCOMES: Symptomatic improvements were achieved, and no subsequent relapses were observed. LESSONS: Although MPNST and GIST are not rare neoplasm in NF1, only 2 case reports have been published on the synchronous occurrence of these tumors. Moreover, no case report has been published on AML in NF1, except 1 renal AML in segmental neurofibromatosis. Identifying the clinical and pathologic significances of the NF1 is important to achieve improved diagnostic accuracy.

[Translated article] Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Diagnostic Timelines in Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) diagnosis is challenging in young children without a family history of NF1. The aims of this study were to estimate diagnostic delays in children without a family history of NF1 and to examine the effects of considering café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling as a single diagnostic criterion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, observational study of all patients diagnosed with NF1 before the age of 18 years who were seen at our hospital. The medical records of those included were reviewed to identify the date on which the diagnostic criteria of NF1 were objectified. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with a known parental history of NF1 and those without. Café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling were assessed as a single diagnostic criterion, and genetic evidence was considered to confirm highly suspicious cases. RESULTS: We studied 108 patients younger than the age of 18 years with a diagnosis of NF1. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 3.94 (±3.8) years for the overall group, 1 year for patients with a parental history of NF1, and 4 years and 8 months for those without. Diagnosis was therefore delayed by 3 years and 8 months in patients without a family history. CONCLUSION: Skin lesions were the first clinical manifestation of NF1 in most patients. We believe that the National Institutes of Health's diagnostic criteria for NF1 should be updated to aid diagnosis in young children.