Treatment Effect of Phototherapy with Low-Level Energy in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: A Single-Arm Observational Study.

Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common health challenges and has a chronic and repetitive course that requires symptomatic treatment. We aimed to investigate the effect of phototherapy on allergic rhinitis and how long it takes to demonstrate treatment effect. Twenty-one patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis using the skin prick test were enrolled. Red light (660 nm) and infrared light (940 nm) with a low power energy of 5 mW were used three times a day at intervals of at least 5 h. The Rhinoconjuntivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to measure the changes in symptoms. The median RQLQ and VAS scores before treatment were 62 (49-81.5) and 3 (2-5) points, respectively. The RQLQ score improved significantly at two and four weeks after treatment (52 [39-62.5]) and 46.0 [30.5-57.0], respectively). The VAS scores also improved significantly at two and four weeks after treatment. Nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea improved significantly at one week after the procedure. Low-power (5 mW) light irradiation (660 nm red light and 940 nm infrared) was effective in improving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. In addition, symptom improvement became clear approximately a week after use. Further studies are required to reach a definitive conclusion.

The analysis of reason for the presence and treatment of chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses in own material.

SummaryIntroduction. . The aim of the study was the analysis of reasons for the occurrence and treatment results of chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses in own materail. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed on 520 women aged 18 - 87 and 789 men aged 19-85, diagnosed and treated for the chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses in 2016 - 2020. The analysis was based on disease medical history, taking into account: gender; age of patients; type of symptoms; allergy diagnosis; probable cause of inflammation; type of anatomical anomalies; assessment of the advancement of lesions based on CT images in the Lund- Mackay scale; number of operations; histopathological result of the removed lesions; complications that occured after surgical treatment.ResultsThe study showed that the hospitalized patients were most often aged 41-50, 51-60 and 31-40 among women and men aged 51-60, 41-50 and 31- 40 . The results of allergological diagnostics among patients with chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses showed that women were most often allergic to pyralgin + ketonal + paracetamol + ibuprofen in 4.50 % , to penicillins in 1.07 % and to house dust saprophytes in 0.92%, while among men, positive reactions were found in 3.36 % for pyralgin + ketonal + paracetamol + ibuprofen, 0.99% for house dust saprophytes and 0.92% for cats and dogs fur. Absence of anatomical anomalies was found among 20.75 % of woman and 26.36 % of men, but most often they occurred in the form of nasal septal curvature and excessively dilated middle nasal turbinate. In the histopathological examination of the lesions from the paranasal sinuses, the following were found: chronicinflammation of mucous membrane, chronic polypoid inflammation, chronic cystic inflammation and chronic allergic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The main symptoms among patients with chronic inflammation of paranasal sinuses were: nasal congestion + rhinorrhea, nasal congestion + rhinorrhea + smell impairment and nasal congestion + rhinorrhea+ headache. The most common probable causes for chronic inflammation of nasal sinuses among the examined patients were: anatomical anomalies, allergies, irritant factors, including tobacco smoke. Depending on the assessment of the severity of changes in the paranasal sinuses according to the Lund- Mackay scale, it appears that medium and large inflammatory lesions prevailed in the examined patients. KEY WORDS: reason/cause, occurrence, treatment results, chronic inflammation of the paranasal sinuses.

Outcome of childhood epistaxis with treatment of allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled study.

The purpose of this study is to (1) to determine if treatment of underlying allergic rhinitis (AR) in children will affect epistaxis outcome, (2) to compare efficacy of three outpatient AR treatment regimens in epistaxis outcomes, and (3) to investigate potential factors in the pathogenesis of epistaxis with underlying AR. A single-blind randomized-controlled study was conducted in the Otolaryngology clinic in KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Sixty children aged below 18 years with underlying untreated AR, with first presentation of epistaxis, were randomized to three different AR treatments: treatment 1, antihistamine (20 patients); treatment 2, nasal steroid spray (20 patients); and treatment 3, both antihistamine and nasal steroid spray (20 patients). Epistaxis severity and frequency were assessed. Pre-treatment, 95% of patients within each of the three treatment groups described epistaxis symptoms. Post-treatment, there was improvement in epistaxis outcome (resolution of epistaxis) with 20% (4/20), 40% (8/20), and 60% (12/20) of patients in treatment groups 1 (antihistamine), 2 (nasal steroid spray), and 3 (combined therapy) respectively, who reported resolution of epistaxis. Treatment regimens containing nasal steroid spray resulted in greater improvement of epistaxis severity and frequency. Combined therapy (treatment 3) resulted in the best epistaxis outcome at 1-month follow-up. Majority (90%) reported nose-picking/rubbing behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal corticosteroids are superior to oral antihistamines in relieving itch or rhinorrhea in AR. Intranasal corticosteroids may be important in treating epistaxis with underlying AR, because digital trauma from itch/rhinorrhea-related nose-picking/rubbing frequently leads to epistaxis. Results from this study will be important to primary and emergency physicians, community pediatricians, and pediatric allergists and otolaryngologists. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Childhood epistaxis commonly co-exists with allergic rhinitis (AR), causing significant symptoms and distress to patients. • There are currently no studies reporti ng on epistaxis outcome aft er treatment of underlying AR. WHAT IS NEW: • This is a single-blind randomized-controlled study of 60 children aged below 18 years with underlying untreated AR, with first presentation of epistaxis to a children's hospital in Singapore Patients were randomized to three different regimens to treat AR: treatment 1, antihistamine; treatment 2, nasal steroid spray; and treatment 3, both antihistamine and nasal steroid spray. • Treatment regimens containing nasal steroid spray improved epistaxis outcomes, with combined therapy of antihistamine and nasal steroid spray resulting in the best outcome for resolution of epistaxis among the three treatment regimens.

High detection rate of viral pathogens in nasal discharge in children aged 0 till 5 years.

Respiratory tract infections (RTI) in children remain a cause of disease burden worldwide. Nasopharyngeal (NP) & oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are used for respiratory pathogen detection, but hold disadvantages particularly for children, highlighting the importance and preference for a child friendly detection method. We aimed to evaluate the performance and tolerability of a rhinorrhea swab (RS) in detecting viral pathogens when compared to a combined OP(/NP) or mid-turbinate (MT) nasal swab. This study was conducted between September 2021 and July 2022 in the Netherlands. Children aged 0-5 years, with an upper RTI and nasal discharge, were included and received a combined swab and a RS. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 PCR were used for viral pathogen detection. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. During 11 months 88 children were included, with a median age of 1.00 year [interquartile range 0.00-3.00]. In total 122 viral pathogens were detected in 81 children (92%). Sensitivity and specificity of the RS compared to a combined swab were respectively 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91%-100%) and 78% (95% CI 45%-94%). Rhinorrhea samples detected more pathogens than the (combined) nasal samples, 112 versus 108 respectively. Median VAS scores were significantly lower for the RS in both children (2 vs. 6) and their parents (0 vs. 5). A RS can therefore just as effectively/reliably detect viral pathogens as the combined swab in young children and is better tolerated by both children and their parents/caregivers.

High detection rate of viral pathogens in nasal discharge in children aged 0 till 5 years.

Respiratory tract infections (RTI) in children remain a cause of disease burden worldwide. Nasopharyngeal (NP) & oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are used for respiratory pathogen detection, but hold disadvantages particularly for children, highlighting the importance and preference for a child friendly detection method. We aimed to evaluate the performance and tolerability of a rhinorrhea swab (RS) in detecting viral pathogens when compared to a combined OP(/NP) or mid-turbinate (MT) nasal swab. This study was conducted between September 2021 and July 2022 in the Netherlands. Children aged 0-5 years, with an upper RTI and nasal discharge, were included and received a combined swab and a RS. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 PCR were used for viral pathogen detection. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. During 11 months 88 children were included, with a median age of 1.00 year [interquartile range 0.00-3.00]. In total 122 viral pathogens were detected in 81 children (92%). Sensitivity and specificity of the RS compared to a combined swab were respectively 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91%-100%) and 78% (95% CI 45%-94%). Rhinorrhea samples detected more pathogens than the (combined) nasal samples, 112 versus 108 respectively. Median VAS scores were significantly lower for the RS in both children (2 vs. 6) and their parents (0 vs. 5). A RS can therefore just as effectively/reliably detect viral pathogens as the combined swab in young children and is better tolerated by both children and their parents/caregivers.

[Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules in treatment of chronic sinusitis].

The present study conducted a systematic review and Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules in the treatment of chronic sinusitis. CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules in the treatment of chronic sinusitis. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and the final included trials underwent Meta-analysis with RevMan 5.4.1. Fifty-four RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 7 278 cases. The results of Meta-analysis showed that the clinical efficacy of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules alone or in combination in the experimental group in the treatment of chronic sinusitis was superior to that in the control group with conventional western medicine, Chinese medicinal preparations, or surgery only(RR=1.19, 95%CI[1.15, 1.24], P<0.000 01). The combined use of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules on the basis of the control group was superior to the control group in improving the main symptoms and signs of chronic sinusitis [RR_(nasal congestion)=1.33, 95%CI[1.21, 1.45], P<0.000 01, RR_(runny nose)=1.28, 95%CI[1.18, 1.40], P<0.000 01, RR_(turbinate congestion or swelling)=1.28, 95%CI[1.16, 1.41], P<0.000 01]. Biyuan Tongqiao Granules alone or in combination could effectively reduce the Snot-20 score, which was superior to the control group(MD=-2.94, 95%CI[-3.60,-2.28], P<0.000 01). Biyuan Tongqiao Granules alone and in combination could effectively reduce the VAS score, which was superior to the control group(MD_(total score)=-4.44, 95%CI[-6.05,-2.82], P<0.000 01; MD_(nasal congestion VAS score)=-0.99, 95%CI[-1.38,-0.60], P<0.000 01; MD_(runny nose VAS score)=-1.19, 95%CI[-1.62,-0.76], P<0.000 01; MD_(dysosmia VAS score)=-0.96, 95%CI[-1.26,-0.65], P<0.000 01; MD_(head and face pain VAS score)=-0.73, 95%CI[-0.98,-0.47], P<0.000 01). The combined use of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules could effectively reduce the sinus CT score and the Lund-Mackey score of the endoscopic mucosal morphology(MD_(sinus CT score)=-3.68, 95%CI[-5.47,-1.88], P<0.000 1, MD_(endoscopic mucosal morphology score)=-3.06, 95%CI[-5.53,-0.59], P=0.02). Compared with the control group with conventional western medicine, Chinese medicinal preparations, or surgery only, combined use of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules did not increase the occurrence of adverse reactions(RR=0.68, 95%CI[0.26, 1.77], P=0.43). As demonstrated by the existing evidence, Biyuan Tongqiao Granules can improve the clinical efficacy of chronic sinusitis, relieve the clinical symptoms and signs, and reduce the Snot-20 score, VAS score, and Lund-Mackey score, without inducing serious adverse reactions, indicating that Biyuan Tongqiao Granules alone or in combination are more effective and safe in the treatment of chronic sinusitis than conventional western medicine, Chinese medicinal preparations, or surgical treatment. Since the quality of the included trials was generally low, large-scale, high-quality, rigorous, multi-center, and blinded-designed RCTs that meet international standards should be adopted in the future to increase the strength and level of evidence.

[Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Lianhua Qingwen preparations combined with Oseltamivir in treatment of influenza].

This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen preparations combined with Oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched for the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving the comparison between the influenza patients treated with Lianhua Qingwen preparations combined with Oseltamivir and those treated with Oseltamivir alone. Fever clearance time was taken as the primary outcome indicator. Clinical effective rate(markedly effective and effective), time to muscle pain relief, time to sore throat relief, time to cough relief, time to nasal congestion and runny nose relief, time to negative result of viral nucleic acid test, and adverse reactions were taken as the secondary outcome indicators. The data were extracted based on the outcome indicators and then combined. The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to evaluate the quality of a single RCT, and the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluations(GRADE) system to assess the quality of a single outcome indicator. RevMan 5.3 was employed to analyze data and test heterogeneity. Finally, 16 RCTs involving 1 629 patients were included for analysis. The Meta-analysis showed that Lianhua Qingwen preparations combined with Oseltamivir was superior to Oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in terms of clinical effective rate(RR=1.16, 95%CI [1.12, 1.20], P<0.000 01), fever clearance time(SMD=-2.02, 95%CI [-2.62,-1.41], P<0.000 01), time to muscle pain relief(SMD=-2.50, 95%CI [-3.84,-1.16], P=0.000 2), time to sore throat relief(SMD=-1.40, 95%CI [-1.93,-0.85], P<0.000 01), time to cough relief(SMD=-1.81, 95%CI [-2.44,-1.19], P<0.000 01), time to nasal congestion and runny nose(SMD=-2.31, 95%CI [-3.61,-1.01], P=0.000 5), and time to negative result of viral nucleic acid test(SMD=-0.68, 95%CI [-1.19,-0.16], P=0.01). However, due to the low quality of the trials, the above conclusions need to be proved by more high-quality clinical studies. In addition, we still need to attach importance to the adverse reactions of the integrated application of Chinese and western medicines.

The Clinical Significance of Otolaryngology Manifestations in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective Although the absence of a runny nose and sore throat, both ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptoms, suggests community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the association between ENT symptoms and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia remains unclear. We therefore investigated the association between ENT symptoms and COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods We retrospectively recruited consecutive confirmed COVID-19 inpatients with and without pneumonia admitted to a single institution from April 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. After a descriptive analysis, we implemented univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess the association between ENT symptoms and COVID-19 pneumonia. Results The present study included 385 patients. Pneumonia patients exhibited lower rates of positive runny nose and sore throat than non-pneumonia patients. Univariable analyses found mean odds ratios of 0.59 and 0.61 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.30-1.16 and 0.32-1.17 for runny nose and sore throat, respectively, and multivariable analyses found mean odds ratios of 0.73 and 0.70 and 95% CIs of 0.34-1.56 and 0.34-1.46, respectively. Conclusion Our study found no statistically significant association between ENT symptoms and COVID-19 pneumonia. Clinicians should be aware that, unlike CAP, there is no correlation between ENT symptoms and pneumonia among patients with COVID-19, so it is necessary to consider the possibility of pneumonia even in the presence of ENT symptoms.

Diagnostic Value of Radioisotope Cisternography Using 111In-DTPA in a Patient with Rhinorrhea and Purulent Meningitis.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a rare condition. Prompt diagnosis and early treatment of CSF leakage minimizes the risk of severe complications such as bacterial meningitis. Different diagnostic modalities are used to detect the site of CSF leakage but often with unreliable results. The literature offers limited evidence-based guidance on the diagnostic approach for rhinorrhea. Correct localization of the defect is the mainstay for successful surgical treatment. Herein, we describe a case of recurrent meningitis due to cranio-nasal fistula and rhinorrhea successfully localized with radioisotope cisternography (RIC). We provide a detailed and practical overview of the RIC procedure and compare different imaging modalities used to detect the site of CSF leakage.

Efficacy of Vidian Neurectomy and Posterior Nasal Neurectomy in the Management of Nonallergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) is characterized by rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, and sneezing, in the absence of systemic sensitization to allergens. For cases refractory to medical therapy and conservative surgical interventions, more targeted procedures, such as endoscopic vidian neurectomy (EVN) and posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN), including surgical (SPNN) and cryoablative (CPNN) methods, may reduce symptoms of NAR. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, side effect profile, and complication rate between EVN and PNN for NAR. METHODS: A systematic review of primary articles that reported original patient data for either EVN or PNN was conducted using Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane databases since 2006, according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome of the study was an improvement in NAR symptom severity. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative side effects or complications. RESULTS: In total, 58 articles met the search criteria with a total of 9 studies (including 2 RCTs) eligible for inclusion. There was a pooled sample of 229 NAR patients that underwent EVN (n = 65; 28.4%), SPNN (n = 50; 21.8%), or CPNN (n = 114; 49.8%). For all 3 techniques, there was a statistically significant improvement in nasal symptoms, particularly rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and obstruction along with quality of life. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting prevented meta-analysis and direct comparison of efficacy. The pooled incidence of postoperative complications for EVN (n = 65), SPNN (n = 50), and CPNN (n = 70) was 30.8% versus 0% versus 2.9% for dry eye, 16.9% versus 0% versus 1.4% for palatal/cheek numbness, and 0% versus 6% versus 4.3% for bleeding. CONCLUSION: EVN, SPNN, and CPNN are similarly efficacious for patients with NAR refractory to medical management. SPNN and CPNN are associated with lower rates of complications (dry eye and palatal/cheek numbness) compared with EVN.

Epidemiology of rhinovirus under the COVID-19 pandemic in Guangzhou, China, 2020.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the epidemic characteristics of the human rhinovirus (HRV) outbreaks in Guangzhou, China, in 2020. METHODS: Descriptive epidemiological methods were used to analyze the HRV-related outbreaks in Guangzhou, 2020. RESULTS: Seventeen outbreaks were reported in 2020 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Guangzhou, a total of 465 patients (290 males and 175 females) were enrolled, with a median age of 10. A total of 223 (47.96%) had been tested for HRV, 89 (39.91%) of which were positive; 344/465 (73.98%) had a fever, 138/465 (29.68%) had a runny nose, 139/465 (29.89%) had a sore throat, 86/465 (18.49%) had a cough, 41/465 (8.82%) had a headache, and 37/465 (7.96%) had a sneeze. Patients at age of 13-15 had the highest rate of sore throat and runny nose, patients aged 11-12 had the highest rate of sneezing, and patients at age of 12-14 had the highest rate of positive rate. Patients tested positive had a higher rate of fever (χ2 = 11.271, p = .001), cough (χ2 = 6.987, p = .008), runny nose (χ2 = 7.980, p = .005), and sneeze (χ2 = 4.676, p = .031). CONCLUSION: The HRV was restored during the fighting of the COVID-19 pandemic. The conventional COVID-19 control measures were not effective enough in preventing rhinovirus. More appropriate control measures should be used to control HRV.

Association between Concentration of Air Pollutants and Prevalence of Inflammatory Sinonasal Diseases: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Air pollution is a serious health concern and affects inflammatory sinonasal diseases such as allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Clarifying the relationship between air pollutants and upper respiratory diseases could help the patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the concentration of air pollutants and the prevalence of AR and CRS among South Koreans. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, nationwide data were reviewed for participants of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008 to 2012. Participants were surveyed with health questionnaires, examined with endoscopies by otolaryngologists, and tested with serum immunoglobulin E levels. The concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤10 µm (PM10) were measured in 16 areas of South Korea. Air pollutant concentrations of geographic districts were matched to each participant's residence. Logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among 27 863 eligible adults, 3359 and 1606 participants had AR or CRS, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis for AR, PM10 showed statistically significant results (odds ratio [OR] = 1.145, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.042-1.258). No air pollutants showed statistically significant differences in the prevalence of CRS. In AR, PM10 (OR = 1.458, 95% CI = 1.201-1.770) was associated with endoscopic findings of watery rhinorrhea, whereas SO2 (OR = 1.202, 95% CI = 1.100-1.313) was associated with pale mucosa. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AR was significantly associated with PM10 concentration. In patients with AR, endoscopic findings of watery rhinorrhea were associated with PM10. However, CRS was not associated with the air pollutant concentrations. Lower concentration of PM10 might help managing the clinical symptoms in patients of AR.

Predictive Value of Isolated Symptoms for Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Children Tested During Peak Circulation of the Delta Variant.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing policies for symptomatic children attending US schools or daycare vary, and whether isolated symptoms should prompt testing is unclear. We evaluated children presenting for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing to determine if the likelihood of having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test differed between participants with 1 symptom vs ≥2 symptoms, and to examine the predictive capability of isolated symptoms. METHODS: Participants aged <18 years presenting for clinical SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing in 6 sites in urban/suburban/rural Georgia (July-October, 2021; Delta variant predominant) were queried about individual symptoms. Participants were classified into 3 groups: asymptomatic, 1 symptom only, or ≥2 symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 test results and clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) for isolated symptoms were calculated by fitting a saturated Poisson model. RESULTS: Of 602 participants, 21.8% tested positive and 48.7% had a known or suspected close contact. Children reporting 1 symptom (n = 82; odds ratio [OR], 6.00 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.70-13.33]) and children reporting ≥2 symptoms (n = 365; OR, 5.25 [95% CI, 2.66-10.38]) were significantly more likely to have a positive COVID-19 test than asymptomatic children (n = 155), but they were not significantly different from each other (OR, 0.88 [95% CI, .52-1.49]). Sensitivity and PPV were highest for isolated fever (33% and 57%, respectively), cough (25% and 32%), and sore throat (21% and 45%); headache had low sensitivity (8%) but higher PPV (33%). Sensitivity and PPV of isolated congestion/rhinorrhea were 8% and 9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With high Delta variant prevalence, children with isolated symptoms were as likely as those with multiple symptoms to test positive for COVID-19. Isolated fever, cough, sore throat, or headache, but not congestion/rhinorrhea, offered the highest predictive value.

Efficacy and safety of the Chinese herbal medicine Xiao-qing-long-tang for allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: The classic Chinese herbal medicine formula Xiao-qing-long-tang (XQLT) is commonly recommended to manage allergic rhinitis (AR), but the treatment efficacy and safety of XQLT are uncertain. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of XQLT in treating AR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine databases were searched from their inception to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating XQLT for AR were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis and a subgroup meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of XQLT. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. XQLT was compared to both placebo and Western medicine (WM), and XQLT combined with WM was compared with WM alone. Meta-analyses were conducted for total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), four individual nasal symptom scores, quality of life (QoL), effective rate, and recurrence rate. The TNSS decreased after XQLT treatment and combination treatment (mean difference (MD): -0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) [-1.20, -0.38], standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.42; 95% CI [-1.59, -1.24], and SMD: -1.84; 95% CI [-2.08, -1.60]). The two individual nasal symptom scores decreased after XQLT treatment and combination treatment; these nasal symptoms comprised rhinorrhea (SMD: -0.30; 95% CI [-0.58, -0.02] and SMD: -0.48; 95% CI [-0.70, -0.26]), and nasal obstruction (SMD: -0.54; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.30] and SMD: -0.54; 95% CI [-0.76, -0.32). XQLT and XQLT combined with WM achieved a better effective rate than WM (risk ratio (RR): 1.18; 95% CI [1.11, 1.25] and RR: 1.16; 95% CI [1.10, 1.23]) and a lower recurrence rate than WM (RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.13, 0.43] and RR: 0.47; 95% CI [0.31, 0.72]). XQLT was well tolerated in patients being treated for AR. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that oral XQLT may alleviate the TNSS, rhinorrhea scores, and nasal obstruction scores of AR and is safe to use in clinical practice. However, more RCTs that follow rigorous methodologies and evaluate well-accepted outcome measures are required to evaluate the effectiveness of XQLT.