Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) based prioritisation of new patient symptomatic cases referred for colorectal investigation.

AIM: Quantitative faecal haemoglobin (fHb) measurement by faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a powerful biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) and is incorporated in referral, prioritisation and triage protocols for symptomatic cases in other countries. We report our use of FIT to prioritise new patient symptomatic cases referred for colorectal investigation. METHOD: Cases referred for investigation of new colorectal symptoms who were aged ≥50 years (≥40 years Maori/Pacific peoples), who would otherwise be triaged to non-urgent colonoscopy, were asked to provide a stool sample for FIT. Following FIT testing, cases were re-triaged to either urgent colonoscopy, non-urgent colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography (CTC) depending on fHb concentration (measured in micrograms haemoglobin per gram of stool [mcg/g]) and incorporating clinical judgement. At pathway initiation, cases already waiting for colonoscopy on the non-urgent new patient waiting list were approached first, and then new patient (NP) referrals for colonoscopy could be triaged to the pathway at the discretion of the triaging consultant. RESULTS: Out of 739 cases, 715 (97%) returned FIT samples, and 691 cases completed colorectal investigations. Overall FIT positivity ≥10mcg/g was 17.1%. Fifteen colorectal cancers (CRC) were detected (2.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of FIT ≥10mcg/g for CRC were 80.0% (54.0-93.7%) and 84.3 (81.4-86.9%) respectively. A total of 432 cases (62.5%) completed the pathway without recourse to colonoscopy, and the median time to CRC diagnosis for NP from referral was 25 days. CONCLUSION: FIT based prioritisation of cases referred with symptoms concerning for CRC is feasible and reduces time to CRC diagnosis.

Gastric Cancer Screening: Intention to Adhere and Patients' Perspective.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third cause of cancer mortality worldwide. A screening strategy that combines an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) with a screening colonoscopy may be cost-effective in intermediate-risk regions. This study aimed to evaluate the intention to adhere to combined endoscopic screening and assess knowledge of GC symptoms, risk factors, and barriers to screening. METHODS: Cross-sectional study enrolling individuals eligible for CRC screening in northern Portugal, where a populational fecal occult blood test (FOBT) program is implemented. The validated PERCEPT-PREVENT tool was applied across three groups: (a) not yet invited to CRC screening, (b) FOBT-positive referred to colonoscopy, and (c) primary colonoscopy screening. RESULTS: A high acceptance rate was observed for combined endoscopic screening (94%; n = 264) [not yet invited to CRC screening 98% (n = 90) vs. FOBT-positive referred to colonoscopy 90% (n = 103) vs. primary colonoscopy 97% (n = 71); p = 0.017], with the vast majority reporting intention to adhere in the setting of full reimbursement (97%; n = 255). Most respondents were unaware of any possible GC symptom (76%; n = 213), risk factor (73%; n = 205), and UGIE-related complication (85%; n = 237). Regular follow-up with the primary care physician (Odds Ratio (OR) 27.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.99-254.57), lower perceived negative health consequences of UGIE (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13-1.74), and lower perceived financial burden (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.04-5.85) were the only factors independently associated with a higher intention to undergo combined screening. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to undergo combined endoscopic screening was notably high and positively impacted by lower perceived barriers. Additional efforts should be undertaken to improve levels of digestive health literacy.

Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low. OBJECTIVES: We compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age groups and sex over 20 years in a large Italian population. We particularly focused on changes in trends following FIT-screening implementation in the target population (50-69 years). DESIGN: This retrospective study analysed data from the Veneto Region's administrative Hospital Discharge Dataset, involving over 54 000 patients aged 40-89 (43.4% female) who underwent CRC surgery between 2002 and 2021. RESULTS: Overall, surgery rates increased until 2007 (annual percentage changes: 2.5% in males, 2.9% in females) and then declined (-4.2% in males, -3.4% in females). This decline was steeper for distal and rectal cancers compared with proximal cancer, suggesting a shift towards more right-sided CRC surgery.In males, the prescreening increase in proximal surgery was reversed after screening implementation (slope change: -6%) while the prescreening decline accelerated for distal (-4%) and rectal (-3%) surgeries. In females, stable prescreening trends shifted downward for all sites (-5% for proximal, -8% for distal and -7% for rectal surgery). However, the change in trends between prescreening and postscreening periods was not different across anatomic sites for either sex (all slope change differences in pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant). CONCLUSION: The shift towards proximal surgery may not be entirely due to the FIT's low sensitivity but may reflect an underlying upward trend in proximal cancers independent of screening.

Barriers and proposed solutions to at-home colorectal cancer screening tests in medically underserved health centers across three US regions to inform a randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: At-home colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an effective way to reduce CRC mortality, but screening rates in medically underserved groups are low. To plan the implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial comparing two population-based outreach approaches, we conducted qualitative research on current processes and barriers to at-home CRC screening in 10 community health centers (CHCs) that serve medically underserved groups, four each in Massachusetts and California, and two tribal facilities in South Dakota. METHODS: We conducted 53 semi-structured interviews with clinical and administrative staff at the participating CHCs. Participants were asked about CRC screening processes, categorized into eight domains: patient identification, outreach, risk assessment, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) workflows, FIT-DNA (i.e., Cologuard) workflows, referral for a follow-up colonoscopy, patient navigation, and educational materials. Transcripts were analyzed using a Rapid Qualitative Analysis approach. A matrix was used to organize and summarize the data into four sub-themes: current process, barriers, facilitators, and solutions to adapt materials for the intervention. RESULTS: Each site's process for stool-based CRC screening varied slightly. Interviewees identified the importance of offering educational materials in English and Spanish, using text messages to remind patients to return kits, adapting materials to address health literacy needs so patients can access instructions in writing, pictures, or video, creating mailed workflows integrated with a tracking system, and offering patient navigation to colonoscopy for patients with an abnormal result. CONCLUSION: Proposed solutions across the three regions will inform a multilevel intervention in a pragmatic trial to increase CRC screening uptake in CHCs.

Colorectal Cancer Detection during a Screening Awareness Campaign in a High-Risk Region in Oman.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in Oman.  This study report the result of a community based screening campaign to promote the early detection and explore the associated risk factors of CRC amongst Omani population. METHODS: We launched a colorectal cancer awareness campaign in Oman's South Ash Sharqiyah Governorate between January and March, 2023. We conducted a stratified random study including 688 adult Omani participants aged over 40 years old. Local Health Centers collected the questionnaire forms. Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) were carried out at Local Health Centers; while medical professionals performed the colonoscopy examination in Sur University Hospital. RESULTS: Overall, the screening response rate was 68.8%. The data indicated that 8.1% of the total sample yielded positive FOBTs; of whom, 85.7% were aged 40-59 years old and 67.9% were obese or overweight. Abnormal colonoscopy was reported in 7 participants. One participant had a confirmed CRC of stage I. CONCLUSION: Screening and early detection campaign can have effect and increase the rate of early detection among population in Oman.

Evaluation of a Faith-Placed Health Education Service on Bowel Cancer Screening in Mosques in East London.

BACKGROUND: Bowel cancer screening using faecal immunochemical testing is provided in the United Kingdom with the aim of reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. However, there are low participant rates among ethnic minorities across the United Kingdom. Faith-placed interventions have the potential to improve screening rates among such populations, but studies examining their effectiveness are scarce. METHODS: We delivered a presentation on bowel cancer screening to 204 Muslims in seven mosques in East London (intervention group). All participants completed a questionnaire regarding attitudes, perceptions and knowledge of bowel cancer screening before and after the presentation. Concurrently, we administered the questionnaire to 72 subjects attending a mosque that did not receive the presentation (comparison group). RESULTS: The intervention group showed a greater willingness to do the test (90% vs. 67%, p < 0.001) and to recommend it to others (96% vs. 74%, p < 0.001), ability to complete the test by themselves (94% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and confidence in noticing symptoms (78% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) after the presentation compared to before. There was a significant difference between the intervention group post-presentation and the comparison group on intention to do the test (90% vs. 79%, p = 0.02), recommending it to others (96% vs. 83%, p < 0.001), and confidence in their ability to complete the test by themselves (94% vs. 63%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A culture-sensitive, faith-placed health education intervention delivered in mosques can substantially improve knowledge of bowel cancer screening and increase the intention to participate in the screening programme. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The intervention presentation was developed using insights from four public involvement sessions with four to six members representative of the East London Muslim community. The sessions sought attendees' thoughts on appropriate ways to approach the intervention design for their community and asked for their views on the acceptability, appropriateness of messaging, format/design and likely impact of the presentation. Their views were then utilised to improve the presentation.

Factors Affecting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Physician Practices in Ukraine.

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify the factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices, along with the barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Ukraine. Considering health care system challenges, including those posed by the ongoing war, this research seeks to inform improvements in CRC screening and outcomes in Ukraine and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A survey was designed and distributed electronically to Ukrainian PCPs, focusing on CRC screening practices, beliefs, and barriers. The survey incorporated questions adapted from established cancer screening surveys and frameworks. Complete responses were collected from 740 PCPs. Sample statistics were computed, and population-level perceptions and associations with CRC screening practices were estimated by standardizing responses to national PCP demographics. RESULTS: The majority of respondents were women (91%) and specialized in family medicine (84%). Respondents believed in the effectiveness of colonoscopy for reducing CRC mortality (80%), with 75% of PCPs referring patients for this screening modality. Major barriers identified include inadequate training of PCPs in screening and lack of resources. Respondents reported high utilization of fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy for screening when these tests were said to be available in their practices. Self-reported familiarity with CRC screening guidelines and participation in educational workshops were positively associated with screening referrals. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the role of access to CRC screening tests and awareness of screening guidelines in enhancing CRC screening practices among Ukrainian PCPs. Addressing training and resource barriers, alongside public health interventions targeting patient-related barriers, is essential. These findings offer valuable insights for LMICs facing similar challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to improve cancer screening in these health care settings.

Optimization of colorectal cancer screening strategies: New insights.

In this editorial, we discuss the article by Agatsuma et al. We concentrate specifically on the current routinely used screening tests recommended by society guidelines and delve into the significance of early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its substantial impact on both incidence and mortality rates. Screening is highly recommended, and an early diagnosis stands out as the most crucial predictor of survival for CRC patients. Therefore, it is essential to identify and address the barriers hindering adherence to screening measures, as these barriers can vary among different populations. Furthermore, we focus on screening strategy optimization by selecting high-risk groups. Patients with comorbidities who regularly visit hospitals have been diagnosed at an early stage, showing no significant difference compared to patients undergoing regular screening. This finding highlights the importance of extending screening measures to include patients with comorbidities who do not routinely visit the hospital.

Income differences in time to colon cancer diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: People with low income have worse outcomes throughout the cancer care continuum; however, little is known about income and the diagnostic interval. We described diagnostic pathways by neighborhood income and investigated the association between income and the diagnostic interval. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of colon cancer patients diagnosed 2007-2019 in Ontario using routinely collected data. The diagnostic interval was defined as the number of days from the first colon cancer encounter to diagnosis. Asymptomatic pathways were defined as first encounter with a colonoscopy or guaiac fecal occult blood test not occurring in the emergency department and were examined separately from symptomatic pathways. Quantile regression was used to determine the association between neighborhood income quintile and the conditional 50th and 90th percentile diagnostic interval controlling for age, sex, rural residence, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 64,303 colon cancer patients were included. Patients residing in the lowest income neighborhoods were more likely to be diagnosed through symptomatic pathways and in the emergency department. Living in low-income neighborhoods was associated with longer 50th and 90th-percentile symptomatic diagnostic intervals compared to patients living in the highest income neighborhoods. For example, the 90th percentile diagnostic interval was 15 days (95% CI 6-23) longer in patients living in the lowest income neighborhoods compared to the highest. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal income inequities during the diagnostic phase of colon cancer. Future work should determine pathways to reducing inequalities along the diagnostic interval and evaluate screening and diagnostic assessment programs from an equity perspective.

Faecal immunochemical tests can improve colonoscopy triage in patients with iron deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Use of the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to triage patients with iron deficiency (ID) for colonoscopy due to suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) may improve distribution of colonoscopic resources. We reviewed the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia, including CRC and advanced pre-cancerous neoplasia (APCN), in patients with ID, with or without anaemia. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of three databases for studies comprising of patients with ID, with or without anaemia, completing a quantitative FIT within six months prior to colonoscopy, where test performance was compared against the reference standard colonoscopy. Random effects meta-analyses determined the diagnostic performance of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: Nine studies were included on a total of n=1761 patients with ID, reporting FIT positivity thresholds between 4-150 µg haemoglobin/g faeces. Only one study included a non-anaemic ID (NAID) cohort. FIT detected CRC and APCN in ID patients with 90.7 % and 49.3 % sensitivity, and 81.0 % and 82.4 % specificity, respectively. FIT was 88.0 % sensitive and 83.4 % specific for CRC in patients with ID anaemia at a FIT positivity threshold of 10 µg haemoglobin/g faeces. CONCLUSIONS: FIT shows high sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia and may be used to triage those with ID anaemia where colonoscopic resources are limited, enabling those at higher risk of CRC to be prioritised for colonoscopy. There is a need for further research investigating the diagnostic performance of FIT in NAID patients.

Increasing Colorectal Screening Uptake in Spouses of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Using a Randomized Behavioral Trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the few cancers for which screening has been associated with better survival and morbidity, but screening uptake has been underexplored in spouses of existing patients with CRC. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a brief, structured behavioral intervention delivered to spouses of patients with CRC in a colorectal clinical setting could increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) uptake within 3 months of the study period. METHODS: This study was designed as a block randomized, unblinded, parallel trial conducted in the colorectal outpatient clinics of 2 public tertiary hospitals in Singapore from December 2017 to February 2023. The intervention group received a structured informational pamphlet on CRC screening by the Singapore Ministry of Health and a printed guide with instructions on how to properly use a FIT kit. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the 2 groups. There was a statistically significant difference (P<.001) in FIT screening uptake between spouses in each group, with 86.2% (n=25) in the intervention group and 38.7% (n=12) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that a brief, structured behavioral intervention offered to spouses accompanying patients with CRC while they wait for the clinic appointment is useful in increasing FIT screening uptake rates. Colorectal clinics can consider setting aside 10 to 15 minutes to educate accompanying spouses in the future as a complementary avenue to holistically promote CRC prevention, subjected to the resources available in each clinic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04544852.

The impact of primary-care led, faecal immunochemical test-based, triage of new-onset colorectal symptoms on time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer-An observational study.

AIM: Since December 2015, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been provided to primary care in NHS Tayside as an adjunct to clinical acumen in the assessment of new-onset bowel symptoms. The aim of this work was to assess the impact of this approach on time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: NHS Tayside Cancer audit data from January 2013 to December 2019 were reviewed to identify all CRC patients diagnosed via the primary-care referral pathway for a period before and after the introduction of FIT. Their electronic patient records were accessed and date of referral and any contemporaneous FIT and full blood count (FBC) result were recorded. Time from referral to diagnosis of CRC was calculated for each patient and compared between subgroups. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 959 patients: 378 and 581 from the time periods before and after the introduction of FIT, respectively. The median time to diagnosis before FIT was 30 days [interquartile range (IQR) 16-57 days] versus 25 days (IQR 14-47 days) following the introduction of FIT (p = 0.006). Following the introduction of FIT, patients who completed a FIT had a median of time to diagnosis of 23 days (IQR 14-43 days) compared with 30 days (IQR 16-62 days) for patients not completing a FIT (p = 0.019). FBC results were available for 97.5% of FIT patients to aid safety-netting of patients with a low or undetectable faecal haemoglobin concentration. CONCLUSION: The introduction of FIT-based triage of new bowel symptoms in primary care as an adjunct to clinical acumen is associated with a reduced time to CRC diagnosis.

Effectiveness and Acceptability of Targeted Text Message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial (M-TICS Study).

BACKGROUND: Mobile phone-based SMS text message reminders have the potential to improve colorectal cancer screening participation rates. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of adding targeted SMS text message reminders to the standard procedure for those who picked up but did not return their screening kit at the pharmacy within 14 days in a colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: We performed a randomized control trial among individuals who picked up a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit for colorectal cancer screening at the pharmacy but did not return it within 14 days. The intervention group (n=4563) received an SMS text message reminder on the 14th day of kit pick up and the control group (n=4806) received no reminder. A 30-day reminder letter was sent to both groups if necessary. The main primary outcome was the FIT completion rate within 30, 60, and 126 days from FIT kit pick up (intention-to-treat analysis). A telephone survey assessed the acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention. The cost-effectiveness of adding an SMS text message reminder to FIT completion was also performed. RESULTS: The intervention group had higher FIT completion rates than the control group at 30 (64.2% vs 53.7%; P<.001), 60 (78.6% vs 72.0%; P<.001), and 126 (82.6% vs 77.7%; P<.001) days. Participation rates were higher in the intervention arm independent of sex, age, socioeconomic level, and previous screening behavior. A total of 339 (89.2%) interviewees considered it important and useful to receive SMS text message reminders for FIT completion and 355 (93.4%) preferred SMS text messages to postal letters. We observed a reduction of US $2.4 per participant gained in the intervention arm for invitation costs compared to the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Adding an SMS text message reminder to the standard procedure significantly increased FIT kit return rates and was a cost-effective strategy. SMS text messages also proved to be an acceptable and appropriate communication channel for cancer screening programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04343950; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04343950. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1371/journal.pone.0245806.

Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence.

AIM: Insufficient adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening impedes individual and population health benefits, with about one-third of individuals non-adherent to available screening options. The impact of poor adherence is inadequately considered in most health economics models, limiting the evaluation of real-world population-level screening outcomes. This study introduces the CAN-SCREEN (Colorectal cANcer SCReening Economics and adherENce) model, utilizing real-world adherence scenarios to assess the effectiveness of a blood-based test (BBT) compared to existing strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAN-SCREEN model evaluates various CRC screening strategies per 1,000 screened individuals for ages 45-75. Adherence is modeled in two ways: (1) full adherence and (2) longitudinally declining adherence. BBT performance is based on recent pivotal trial data while existing strategies are informed using literature. The full adherence model is calibrated using previously published Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models. Outcomes, including life-years gained (LYG), CRC cases averted, CRC deaths averted, and colonoscopies, are compared to no screening. RESULTS: Longitudinal adherence modeling reveals differences in the relative ordering of health outcomes and resource utilization, as measured by the number of colonoscopies performed per 1,000, between screening modalities. BBT outperforms the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mtsDNA) test with more CRC deaths averted (13) compared to FIT and mtsDNA (7, 11), more CRC cases averted (27 vs. 16, 22) and higher LYG (214 vs. 157, 199). BBT yields fewer CRC deaths averted compared to colonoscopy (13, 15) but requires fewer colonoscopies (1,053 vs. 1,928). LIMITATIONS: Due to limited data, the CAN-SCREEN model with longitudinal adherence leverages evidence-informed assumptions for the natural history and real-world longitudinal adherence to screening. CONCLUSIONS: The CAN-SCREEN model demonstrates that amongst non-invasive CRC screening strategies, those with higher adherence yield more favorable health outcomes as measured by CRC deaths averted, CRC cases averted, and LYG.

This study explored the impact of poor adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, where about one-third of people face barriers to screening. Common models don't consider real-world adherence, so we introduced the CAN-SCREEN model. It uses real-world data to determine how well a blood-based test (BBT) could work compared to existing tests. We studied people starting CRC screening at age 45. The model looked at two adherence scenarios: assuming everyone follows guidelines, and using real-world data about how people follow screening guidelines over time. The BBT's performance was based on a recent study, and we compared it to existing methods using data from the literature. Results per 1,000 simulated patients showed that the BBT outperforms two guideline-recommended stool-based tests, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mtsDNA) test, with more CRC deaths averted (13) compared to FIT and mtsDNA (7, 11), more CRC cases averted (27 vs. 16, 22) and higher LYG (214 vs. 157, 199). BBT prevents less CRC deaths than colonoscopy (13 vs. 15), but it leads to fewer colonoscopies (1,053 compared to 1,928). Despite some limitations due to limited data, our model relies on informed assumptions for the natural history of CRC and real-world adherence. In conclusion, our CAN-SCREEN model shows that CRC screening strategies combining good test performance with high adherence give better health outcomes. Adding a blood test, which could be easier for people to use, could save lives and reduce the number of colonoscopies needed.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Fecal Immunochemical Test, Fecal Calprotectin, and Serum C-Reactive Protein in Diagnosing Patients With Chronic Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate early detection of ileocolonic lesions in patients with chronic lower gastrointestinal symptoms (LGISs) is often difficult due to the rarity of early-stage alarm signs. This study assesses the effectiveness of noninvasive blood and stool biomarkers in diagnosing ileocolonic lesions in patients with chronic LGISs undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study between April 2020 and July 2022 involving patients with LGISs lasting a month or more. Before colonoscopy, we gathered clinical data, blood samples for C-reactive protein (CRP) and stool samples for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) analysis. RESULTS: Of 922 participants analyzed (average age 62 years, 37% male), 130 (14.1%) had significant colonoscopy findings, including cancer, advanced adenoma, and inflammatory conditions. Test effectiveness showed an area under the curve of 0.630 for alarm features, 0.643 for CRP, 0.781 for FIT, and 0.667 for FC. Combining stool tests with alarm features improved diagnostic precision. Those without alarm features had a high negative predictive value of 0.97 with low threshold FIT and FC, missing minimal significant lesions, and no cancer. For patients with alarm features, dual high-cutoff test positivity showed a positive predictive value of 0.67. Adding CRP to fecal tests did not enhance accuracy. DISCUSSION: FIT and FC are valuable in evaluating LGISs. Negative results at low cutoffs can delay colonoscopy in limited resource settings while positive results at dual high cutoffs substantiate the need for the procedure.

Improving colorectal cancer screening programs.

In this editorial we comment on the article by Agatsuma et al published in the World Journal of Gastroenterology. They suggest policies for more effective colorectal screening. Screening is the main policy that has led to lower mortality rates in later years among the population that was eligible for screening. Colonoscopy is the gold standard tool for screening and has preventive effects by removing precancerous or early malignant polyps. However, colonoscopy is an invasive process, and fecal tests such as the current hemoglobin immunodetection were developed, followed by endoscopy, as the general tool for population screening, avoiding logistical and economic problems. Even so, participation and adherence rates are low. Different screening options are being developed with the idea that if people could choose between the ones that best suit them, participation in population-based screening programs would increase. Blood tests, such as a recent one that detects cell-free DNA shed by tumors called circulating tumor DNA, showed a similar accuracy rate to stool tests for cancer, but were less sensitive for advanced precancerous lesions. At the time when the crosstalk between the immune system and cancer was being established as a new hallmark of cancer, novel immune system-related biomarkers and information on patients' immune parameters, such as cell counts of different immune populations, were studied for the early detection of colorectal cancer, since they could be effective in asymptomatic people, appearing earlier in the adenoma-carcinoma development compared to the presence of fecal blood. sCD26, for example, detected 80.37% of advanced adenomas. To reach as many eligible people as possible, starting at an earlier age than current programs, the direction could be to apply tests based on blood, urine or salivary fluid to samples taken during routine visits to the primary health system.

Colorectal cancer screening: Modalities and adherence.

In the last decade, several studies have explored various modalities and strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, taking into account epidemiological data, individual characteristics, and socioeconomic factors. In this editorial, we comment further on a retrospective study by Agatsuma et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology. Our focus is on screening trends, particularly in relation to efforts to improve the currently suboptimal uptake among the general population worldwide, aiming to enhance early diagnosis rates of CRC. There is a need to raise awareness through health edu-cation programs and to consider the use of readily available, non-invasive screening methods. These strategies are crucial for attracting screen-eligible populations to participate in first-line screening, especially those in high- or average-risk groups and in regions with limited resources. Liquid biopsies and biomarkers represent rapidly evolving trends in screening and diagnosis; however, their clinical relevance has yet to be standardized.

[Colorectal cancer in 45-49-year-olds: systematic or targeted screening?] / Cancer du côlon chez les 45-49 ans : dépistage systématique ou ciblé ?

Principles to guide and inform population-based screening decisions cover a wide range of aspects beyond the screening test. Colorectal cancer (CRC) meets these requirements for individuals at moderate risk aged 50 to 69. In Switzerland, screening using a biennial faecal occult blood test or colonoscopy every 10 years is reimbursed free of deductible in 12 programs covering 15 cantons. This article assesses the appropriateness of systematic screening from age 45 in the Swiss context. Prioritizing measures to raise awareness among healthcare professionals and high-risk subjects rather than lowering the age of eligibility would not only be more sensible but would also benefit to the population over 50 years old.

Les critères pour proposer un dépistage organisé couvrent de nombreuses dimensions, au-delà des caractéristiques du test de dépistage. Le cancer colorectal (CCR) répond à ces exigences pour les personnes à risque modéré de 50 à 69 ans. En Suisse, un dépistage par un test biennal de détection de sang occulte dans les selles ou par coloscopie tous les 10 ans est remboursé hors franchise dans 12 programmes couvrant 15 cantons. Cet article fait le point de la situation concernant l'adéquation d'un dépistage organisé du CCR dès 45 ans dans le contexte suisse. Prioriser des mesures de sensibilisation auprès des professionnel-le-s de santé et des sujets à haut risque de CCR serait non seulement plus judicieux que d'abaisser l'âge d'éligibilité au dépistage organisé mais bénéficierait aussi à la population de plus de 50 ans.