Comprehensive management of pericoronitis in lower third molars: extraction, operculectomy, and coronectomy approaches.

Pericoronitis is a common dental condition involving the inflammation of soft tissues around a partially erupted wisdom tooth, typically the lower third molars. It is most frequently diagnosed in young adults aged 20-29, with a higher prevalence in women. The condition often results from the accumulation of bacteria and food debris under the operculum, leading to infection and inflammation. Common symptoms include localized pain, gum swelling, trismus, and sometimes pus discharge. This study aims to discuss the types of clinical management of pericoronitis of the lower third molar as described in the literatureTooth extraction eliminates the source of inflammation, providing long-term relief but carries a higher risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage and greater postoperative discomfort compared to other methods.This minimally invasive procedure removes the gingival cap to prevent food and bacteria accumulation. It is suitable for patients with good oral hygiene and proper tooth angulation. Electrosurgery and laser methods reduce bleeding and swelling but have contraindications. Coronectomy, an alternative to extraction, avoids nerve damage by leaving the roots in place. Suitable for non-carious, pathology-free teeth, it shows lower risk of sensory disturbances and postoperative complications, though root migration may occur. Pericoronitis requires personalized treatment based on patient condition and tooth positioning. Thorough diagnostics and tailored approaches are crucial for effective management and improved outcomes.

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block compared to intraoral conductive block of the inferior alveolar nerve after lower third molar alveolectomy: a clinical prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The analgesia after lower third molar alveolectomy is based on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that have significant risks, and are contraindicated in the third trimester of pregnancy. Aiming to reduce NSAIDs use after this surgery, we quantified analgesic effects of ultrasound (US)-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were equally allocated to the experimental or control group, based on their willingness to receive experimental US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block for postoperative analgesia. The experimental block applied prior to lower third molar alveolectomy, was followed by standard intraoral inferior alveolar nerve block. In the control group, patients received only intraoral block of inferior alveolar nerve. All patients reported pain level (visual analogue scale, VAS) right after the application of blocks. The next day, patients reported duration of pain-free time and the use of analgesic. RESULTS: The US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block prolonged the pain-free time to 8 h (vs. 4 in control group, P < 0.001) and reduced NSAIDs use (12 patients needed analgesic in experimental vs. 17 patients in control group, P = 0.038). The application of experimental block was less painful (VAS = 2) than the application of intraoral inferior alveolar nerve block (VAS = 4, P = 0.011). In 8/18 patients in the experimental group US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block solely achieved adequate surgical anesthesia. CONCLUSION: US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block prolonged pain-free period and reduced the use of NSAIDs after lower third molar alveolectomy, thus proving to be successful analgesia method for this dental surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT06009302 , identification number: NCT06009302, date of registration: 18/08/2023.

The efficiency of two different synthetic bone graft materials on alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a split-mouth study.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar Bone loss occurs frequently during the first six months after tooth extraction. Various studies have proposed different methods to reduce as much as possible the atrophy of the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. Filling the socket with biomaterials after extraction can reduce the resorption of the alveolar ridge. We compared the height of the alveolar process at the mesial and distal aspects of the extraction site and the resorption rate was calculated after the application of HA/ß-TCP or synthetic co-polymer polyglycolic - polylactic acid PLGA mixed with blood to prevent socket resorption immediately and after tooth extraction. METHODS: The study was conducted on 24 extraction sockets of impacted mandibular third molars bilaterally, vertically, and completely covered, with a thin bony layer. HA/ß-TCP was inserted into 12 of the dental sockets immediately after extraction, and the synthetic polymer PLGA was inserted into 12 of the dental sockets. All sockets were covered completely with a full-thickness envelope flap. Follow-up was performed for one year after extraction, using radiographs and stents for the vertical alveolar ridge measurements. RESULTS: The mean resorption rate in the HA/ß-TCP and PLGA groups was ± 1.23 mm and ± 0.1 mm, respectively. A minimal alveolar bone height reduction of HA/ß-TCP was observed after 9 months, the reduction showed a slight decrease to 0.93 mm, while this rate was 0.04 mm after 9 months in the PLGA group. Moreover, the bone height was maintained after three months, indicating a good HA/ß-TCP graft performance in preserving alveolar bone (1.04 mm) while this rate was (0.04 mm) for PLGA. CONCLUSION: The PLGA graft demonstrated adequate safety and efficacy in dental socket preservation following tooth extraction. However, HA/ß-TCP causes greater resorption at augmented sites than PLGA, which clinicians should consider during treatment planning.

Prophylactic third molar removal: are oral surgeons and orthodontists aligned in preventive approaches?

BACKGROUND: There is a general consensus among dental professionals regarding the extraction of impacted third molars in the presence of clinical symptoms. However, there is less agreement on the management of asymptomatic third molars. The objective of this study is to compare the perspectives of oral surgeons and orthodontists regarding the indications for the extraction of asymptomatic third molars. It is possible that healthcare professionals from different specialties may approach the extraction of these teeth in different ways. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a web-based questionnaire has been employed to collect data by inquiring about the reasons why participants prefer the extraction of asymptomatic third molars. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the data obtained. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Prophylactic extraction of partially impacted molars was more favored among the participants (P < 0.05). The orthodontists preferred prophylactic extraction due to the risk of late anterior dental crowding (LADC); however, the oral surgeons preferred pre-pregnancy extractions (P < 0.05). The extraction decision for partial impaction was higher in females when the risk of distal caries was considered. For fully impacted ones, it was higher in males when the risk of caries and pericoronitis were considered (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontists preferred extraction because of the risk of LADC and caries, while oral surgeons focused on preventing pericoronitis, pathology, focal infection, and symptoms during pregnancy. This divergence between the participants may inform the guidelines for prophylactic management of third molars. These findings may be pertinent in gender medicine. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study has been enlightening for departments to consult each other before the extraction of a patient's asymptomatic third molar.

A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional instruments: a split-mouth clinical investigation.

BACKGROUND-OBJECTIVE(S): This randomized, split-mouth study aimed to compare postoperative complications following the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars using piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients, aged 18-35 years, with bilaterally and symmetrically impacted lower third molars, were randomly assigned to undergo extraction using piezosurgery on one side and conventional rotary instruments on the other. RESULTS: The piezosurgery method required a longer operation time. However, it resulted in quicker resolution of postoperative swelling by the 7th day compared to the conventional method, where swelling persisted longer. Mandibular angle-tragus measurements were significantly higher with the conventional method on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. Although mouth opening decreased significantly after piezosurgery, it returned to preoperative levels by the 7th day, outperforming the conventional method. Postoperative pain was notably higher with the conventional method during the first four days but showed no significant difference from the 5th day onward. Alveolar bone healing was significantly better with piezosurgery at the 3rd and 6th months. Temporary paresthesia occurred in one patient from the conventional group, resolving within four weeks. Neither method resulted in alveolar osteitis. CONCLUSION(S): Within the study's limitations, piezosurgery demonstrated a reduction in postoperative discomfort, suggesting its advantage in enhancing patient recovery following lower third molar extractions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Piezosurgery, when used appropriately, can reduce postoperative complications compared to conventional methods. Clinicians should be aware of its indications, benefits, and potential challenges. Trial registration This study was registered as a clinical trial to the ClinicalTrials.gov, and the registration ID is NCT06262841 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06262841 ).

Effects of lactic acid etching on immediate and aged bond strength of resin-dentin bonding interface.

To investigate the effects of lactic acid etching on the immediate and aged bond strength of the resin-dentin bonding interface, the resin-dentin bonding interface was evaluated 24 hours and 6 months later. A total of 42 isolated third molars were randomly divided into 6 experimental groups according to different lactate concentration (35%, 40%, 45%) and acid etching time (30 s, 45 s), with 37% phosphoric acid etching 15 s as a control. In each group, dentin samples were etched under different acidic conditions and bonded with Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) as directed. The immediate group was immediately stored in deionized water at 37 °C for 24 h, and the aging group was stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 6 months. Immediate and aged bond strengths were measured by a micro-tensile tester, and the specimen fracture surface was observed under a microscope. 14 isolated third molars were randomly divided into 7 groups, and each group was etched with acid. Collagen fibers morphology in dentin was examined after gradient dehydration with ethanol by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistically, there was no difference between the resin-dentin immediate bonding strength of 35% lactic acid for 30 s and 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s, but the aged bond strength was greater than that of the phosphoric acid group. According to scanning electron microscope observations, the collagen fiber morphology in 35% and 40% lactate etching dentin 30 s groups was relatively intact compared with other groups. In conclusion, 35% lactic acid etching of dentin 30 s ensures both immediate and aged resin-dentin bond strength.

Comprehensive analysis of bone tissue in extraction sockets of third molars after leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin and photobiomodulation applications.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and photobiomodulation (PBM) applications, which have been repeatedly reported to be superior to control groups, in terms of pain, soft tissue and bone healing in tooth extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, randomized clinical study was completed with 34 patients, who had an indication for extraction of their bilaterally impacted teeth. The right and left teeth of the patients were randomly divided into L-PRF and PBM groups. L-PRF group was treated with the blood product centrifuged for 12 min at 2700 rpm, and the PBM group was treated with a diode laser at different points for 60 s with a wavelength of 940 nm in repeated sessions. Postoperative pain was evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), soft tissue healing with Landry Index (LI), tissue healing in the distal region of mandibular second molar by probing depth measurement, and bone healing via panoramic x-ray using the Image J program. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found for any variable compared between the groups. CONCLUSION: L-PRF and PBM applications provide similar support in the healing of extraction sockets. Nevertheless, the advantages and disadvantages of both methods determine their usage areas. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While L-PRF is advantageous in the early healing of extraction sockets, PBM may be preferred in terms of bone trabeculation in the long term.

Degree of conversion and interfacial adaptation of touch-cure resin cement polymerized by self-curing or dual-curing with reduced light.

OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in degree of conversion (DC) of touch-cure cements polymerized by self-curing with adhesive or dual-curing under reduced light. The second aim was to compare interfacial adaptation of zirconia restoration cemented using touch-cure cements self-cured or dual-cured by reduced light. METHODS: The DC of touch-cure resin cements with adhesive was measured continuously using Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Experimental groups differed depending on touch-cure cement. Each group had three subgroups of polymerization method. For subgroup 1, the DC was measured by self-curing. For subgroups 2 and 3, the DCs were measured by dual-curing with reduced light penetrating 3 mm and 1 mm zirconia blocks, respectively. For interfacial adaptation evaluation, Class I cavity was prepared on an extracted third molar, and zirconia restoration was fabricated. The restoration was cemented using the same cement. Groups and subgroups for interfacial adaptation were the same as those of the DC measurement. After thermo-cycling, interfacial adaptation at the tooth-restoration interface was evaluated using swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging. RESULTS: The DC of touch-cure cement differed depending on the measurement time, resin cement, and polymerization method (p < 0.05). Interfacial adaptation was different depending on the resin cement and polymerization method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For touch-cure cement, light-curing with higher irradiance presented a higher DC and superior interfacial adaptation than light-curing with lower irradiance or self-curing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although some adhesives accelerate the self-curing of touch-cure cement, light-curing for touch-cure cement is necessary for zirconia cementation.

[Impacted third molar root abnormality with mandibular canal close position as a presupposing factor to inferior alveolar nerve trauma]. / Anomalii stroeniya kornei tret'ikh molyarov, tesno prilegayushchikh k nizhnechelyustnomu kanalu, kak predraspolagayushchii faktor travmy nizhnego al'veolyarnogo nerva.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is reducing the risks of surgical injury to the inferior alveolar nerve, by taking into account individual topographic and anatomical features, improving diagnostic methods, and techniques for removing retinated teeth with a close fit to the mandibular canal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An examination was conducted in the Department of Surgical Dentistry (CBCT/OPG) and surgical treatment of 223 patients, with a close fit of the roots of the retinated lower third molar to the mandibular canal. Microslips of teeth with roots intact during removal (n=96) of the main group and the control group (n=52) were prepared with a Micromet Remet manual petrographic machine. The sections were carried out along the longitudinal axis of the tooth with the capture of the area of close fitting of the nerve, the teeth from the control group were sawed longitudinally along the axis of the root. The measurement of the macroanatomic features of the roots was carried out with a micrometer (MCC-MP-100 0.001 electronic «CHEESE¼, manufactured in the Russian Federation), measurements of the thickness of dentine and cement tissues on macroglyphs were carried out using a microscope calibration ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. RESULTS: In the main group, three types of attachment of the mandibular canal to the root of the third molars were distinguished: 20 (96) cases of inter-root attachment of the mandibular canal, 42 (96) apical, 34 (96) lateral (buccal and lingual). A number of anomalies in the structure of the roots of the third molars have been revealed, which are a factor in injury to the neurovascular bundle of the mandibular canal during tooth extraction. The surface of the roots, as well as the microscopes of the tooth sections adjacent to the mandibular canal, were studied under a microscope. CONCLUSION: A number of specific anomalies of the roots of retinated third molars formed by root dilaceration, thinning of cement tissues, hypercementosis, which are formed at the site of the mandibular canal.In the presence of a deep indentation on the root of the tooth, as well as in the presence of areas of apical hypercementosis in the form of a «spike¼, the probability of nerve injury during tooth extraction increases many times, which must be taken into account when removing retinated third molars.

The use of miniplates for nontraditional orthodontic treatment: clinical considerations for referring general dentists.

Distalization of mandibular molars comes with significant challenges, especially in adult and young adult patients. In selected cases, third molar extraction procedures offer the opportunity to place miniplates for anchorage to distalize mandibular molars, providing additional solutions to the traditional extraction of premolars or a single incisor. This approach can be of special interest to adult patients, who may have life commitments and time restraints that limit traditional orthodontic and surgical treatment options, and it can improve the efficiency of dental care. This case series describes 3 clinical scenarios in which miniplates were placed with minimal invasiveness during the removal of impacted third molars, offering the patients nontraditional orthodontic treatment options. Awareness of these options is essential for general dentists so that they can explain all treatment possibilities and provide appropriate referrals to patients with impacted third molars.

[Validation of method for estimation age of majority by the third molar maturity index on the sample of Ufa population]. / Validatsiya metoda opredeleniya vozrasta sovershennoletiya po indeksu zrelosti tret'ego molyara na vyborke naseleniya g. Ufy.

The assessment of majority age is important for determining legal responsibility. The definition of the 3rd molar maturity index (Im3) have proven to be a simple and effective method of majority age establishment, the accuracy of which has been tested in different populations. There is a clear lack of studies in this scientific area in Russia. OBJECTIVE: To test diagnostic accuracy of majority age assessment method by 3rd molar (Cameriere index) in the Ufa sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The number of orthopantomograms equal 120 from males and females aged from 14 to 23 years without apparent pathological changes of the pulp of teeth 38 and 48 was examined. The measures were conducted using the standard R. Cameriere method. The method of logistic regression, determination of predictive values of sensitivity and specificity were used. RESULTS: The Im3 cut-off point, that was equal 0.08, had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 95% in the male sample, accuracy of age group determination was 93%. In the female sample the method sensitivity was 93%, specificity - 97%, accuracy - 97%. CONCLUSION: The study results confirmed the absence of population variability of the Cameriere index value, that makes it possible to use the majority age determination method by 3rd molar for practical application in the examination of a living person at the territory of the Russian Federation.

A finite element analysis on the indication for extracting partially impacted mandibular third molars considering mandibular trauma.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with partially impacted lower third molars (M3) have a higher likelihood of experiencing angle fractures while simultaneously decreasing the risk of condylar fractures. However, the specific biomechanical mechanism responsible for this occurrence remains unclear. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate regarding whether the removal of M3s might actually increase the risk of condylar fractures. This study aimed to evaluate how the presence of M3s influences mandibular fractures resulting from blows to the symphysis and lateral mandibular body, and to determine the indication for extracting M3s in such cases. METHODS: Models of the mandible with a partially M3-impacted model (M3I), M3-extracted model (M3E), and M3-absent model (M3A) were generated using a computer. A traumatic blown force of 2000 N was applied to the symphysis and the right body of the mandible. Von Mises and principal stresses were analyzed, and failure indexes were determined. Two cases of mandibular linear fractures were chosen for model verification and interpretation. RESULTS: When force was applied to the symphysis, the condylar region exhibited the highest stress levels, while stress in the mandibular angle region was much less regardless of the M3 state. On applying the force to the right mandibular body, stress in the condylar region decreased while stress in the mandibular body increased, especially in the blown regions. Impacted tooth or cavity formation post-M3 extraction led to uneven stress distribution on the blown side of the mandible, increasing the risk of mandibular angle fractures. In cases where M3 was absent or the extraction socket had healed, stress from lateral traumatic blown force was evenly distributed along both the inner and outer oblique lines of the mandible, thereby reducing the risk of mandibular fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced risk of condylar fractures in patients with partially impacted lower M3s and mandibular angle fractures is mainly due to lateral blows on the mandible, which generate less stress in the condylar region than blows on the mandibular symphysis, rather than being caused by the M3 itself. Extraction of the lower M3 can decrease the risk of mandibular fractures, with a minor influence on condylar fractures.

Factors influencing inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of mandibular third molar.

BACKGROUND: This study sought toexplore the manifestations of clinical symptoms and identify the risk factors linked to inferior alveolar nerve injury (IANI) in the context of mandibular third molar extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 172 patients admitted to our hospital for mandibular third molar extraction from June 2021 to December 2022 were selected for the study, and the clinical data of the participants were retrospectively analyzed, and the risk factors of IANI associated with mandibular third molar extraction were analyzed by uni/multi-factor logisitic regression. RESULTS: Noticeable distinctions were noted between the groups with and without injuries in relation to age, time of surgery, number of broken roots, angle of blockage, CEJ (cementoenamel junction) distance, curved roots of the molar, clarity of the upper and lower walls of the nerve canal, and Pell & Gregory classification. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, time of surgery, number of broken roots, angle of blockage (40°-70°), CEJ distance (10-12 mm, >12 mm), and curved roots of the molar were independent risk factors for IANI. Multi-factor logistic regression analysis further confirmed that age, number of broken roots, angle of blockage (40°-70°), CEJ distance (10-12 mm, >12 mm), and curved roots of the molar were associated with IANI. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar nerve injury manifests as hyperalgesia or absence of sensation, numbness and abnormal pain in the lower lip. Factors influencing IANI associated with mandibular third molar extraction were age, number of broken roots, angle of blockage (40°-70°), CEJ distance (10-12 mm, >12 mm), and curved roots of the molar.

Effect of a Single Dose of Deflazacort on Postoperative Pain, Swelling, and Trismus after Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery: Randomised Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of deflazacort on pain, swelling, and trismus after impacted lower third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomised, prospective, double-blind, split-mouth clinical study included 26 healthy individuals with bilaterally impacted lower third molars. Group 1 was given a placebo (single-dose vitamin C tablet), and group 2 was given a single 30 mg dose of deflazacort 1 h prior to surgery. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale for 1 week postoperatively. Oedema (in mm) and trismus (in mm) were evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative days 2 and 7. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for group analyses. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the deflazacort group at the 6th and 12th hours after surgery (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in trismus between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). There was less oedema in the deflazacort group on postoperative days 2 and 7, without any statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A single preoperative dose of 30 mg deflazacort was found to be clinically effective in reducing pain and oedema after extraction of impacted lower third molars.

Comparison of the effects of submucosal hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection following impacted third molar surgery.

BACKGROUND: Limiting postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection is crucial for smooth healing. This prospective, controlled clinical trial investigated and compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in relieving these complications. METHODS: In groups Ia and IIa, 8 mg of dexamethasone and 150 IU of hyaluronidase were administered following the removal of impacted teeth, respectively. The contralateral sides (groups Ib and IIb) were determined as control groups. Edema, pain, trismus, and infection were clinically evaluated on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Hyaluronidase provided significantly more edema relief than dexamethasone on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (P = 0.031, 0.002, 0.000, and 0.009, respectively). No statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in VAS and rescue analgesic intake amount values for all time points. Hyaluronidase was more effective in reducing trismus than dexamethasone on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative days (P = 0.029, 0.024, respectively). Neither of the agents significantly increased the postoperative infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase can be selected when postoperative excessive edema and trismus are anticipated. Dexamethasone may be a cost-effective option if postoperative pain control is merely targeted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT05466604) on 20/07/2022.

Evaluation of adhesive properties and enzymatic activity at the hybrid layer of a simplified adhesive loaded with 0.2 % Cu and 5 % ZnO nanoparticles: A Randomized Clinical Trial and ex vivo analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an adhesive loaded with 0.2 % copper (Cu) and 5 % zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (Nps) on its adhesive properties and enzymatic activity at the hybrid layer ex vivo in a randomized clinical model. METHODS: Fifteen patients participated in this study, and a total of 30 third molars were used. Occlusal cavities (4 × 4 × 2 mm) were made in each tooth, and randomly divided into 2 groups: (i) Experimental group: commercial adhesive loaded with 0.2wt % CuNps and 5wt % ZnONps; and (ii) Control Group: non-loaded commercial adhesive. Teeth were restored with resin composite. Thirty days later, extractions were performed. Extracted teeth were longitudinally sectioned. Nps in powder were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Microtensile bond strength (µTBS), degree of conversion (DC), and nanoleakeage (NL) tests were executed. In situ zymography (Zym) was performed to evaluate the gelatinolytic activity at the hybrid layer. Student's t-test (α = 0.05) was applied for all tests. RESULTS: µTBS and DC did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) between both groups. However, NL and gelatinolytic activity at the hybrid layer showed significant values (p < 0.05) for experimental group in comparison with control group. CONCLUSION: The addition of 0.2 % CuNps and 5 % ZnONps to a universal adhesive decreases NL and gelatinolytic activity at the hybrid layer, without jeopardizing its adhesive properties. SIGNIFICANCE: This randomized clinical trial with ex vivo analysis demonstrate that a commercial adhesive modified with 0.2wt % Cu and 5wt % ZnO Nps that does not affect its adhesive properties, reducing gelatinolytic activity and nanoleakage at the hybrid layer, which should contribute to an improvement of long term bonding-dentine clinical performance.

Localised 0.2% chlorhexidine irrigation delivery system versus oral antibiotics in reducing postoperative complications in the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM). - a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of the use of 0.2% chlorhexidine irrigation and the oral antibiotics for the prevention of postoperative complication like pain, trismus, swelling and infection after the surgical extraction of IMTM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised, double blinded clinical trial was planned with two equal groups. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer-generated codes with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group I (Control): Standard preoperative and postoperative systemic oral antibiotics and Group II (Study): No systemic antibiotics and Chlorhexidine irrigation local delivery. The primary outcomes evaluated were postoperative pain, mouth opening, swelling and infection. The secondary outcome variables were the number of analgesics and antibiotics taken by the patient in the postoperative period, the satisfaction of the patient and adverse events, were followed up regulary for 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients, divided into two equal groups participated in the study. In intergroup comparison of swelling, the difference was non-significant on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 7, except for POD 3, where it showed significantly lower results in the antibiotic group (p = 0.012). However, there was no significant difference in pain found between both groups at any of the postoperative time points, and the study group had a lesser need for rescue analgesics than the control group. A statistically significant difference in incidence of dry socket was observed (p = 0.03) and gastrointestinal adverse symptoms, but it showed insignificant results for wound dehiscence and pus discharge. Also, patient satisfaction was higher in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: both antibiotics and localised delivery demonstrated comparable results in terms of swelling, pain and trismus. However, with lesser adverse events, the localised chlorhexidine delivery with curved tips outperformed the antibiotic group.

A Comparison of Immunohistochemical Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Dental Follicles with Different Radiographic Sizes.

Background: Odontogenic cysts and tumors develop from the dental follicle of asymptomatic impacted teeth. Odontogenic tissues express the epidermal growth factor receptor family (EGFR), which mediates cell proliferation, survival, and neoplastic differentiation. The present study aimed to compare the immunohistochemical expression of EGFR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the dental follicle of impacted wisdom teeth with normal and abnormal radiographic size. Methods: In this analytical study, immunohistochemical staining of EGFR and HER2 was performed on 30 normal and 30 abnormal follicles of impacted third molars. Follicles with a width of <2.5 mm were considered normal, whereas those with a width of ≥2.5 mm were regarded as abnormal. The immunoreactive score (IRS) was used to report the expression levels of EGFR and HER2. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software. Age and sex were compared in normal and abnormal groups with independent t test and Chi square test, respectively. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The EGFR and HER2 overall expression was high in all normal and abnormal follicles. The comparison of the percentage of stained cells and intensity of EGFR and HER2 staining in normal and abnormal follicles were not significantly different (P=0.73, P=0.63, P=0.95, respectively). Conclusion: Due to the high expression of EGFR and HER2 in normal and abnormal follicles, as well as the lack of significant differences in these two groups, the radiographic size of dental follicles might not indicate the potential capabilities of their cells, and more research in this field is recommended.

Removal of mandibular third molars: An overview of risks, a proposal for international community and guidance.

The aim of this proposal is to (1) review the current literature, (2) shed light on the importance of creating universally accepted guidelines, (3) provide help and guidance in the decision-making process with regard to the removal of mandibular third molars (M3Ms), and (4) reduce the risk of exposing the patient to unnecessary harm and complications due to the inappropriate removal or retention of M3Ms.It is obvious that the indications for the extraction of M3Ms will continue to be an area of controversy and strong debate. The evidence for or against prophylactic extraction is ambivalent; there is evidence to accept or reject the stance against prophylactic extraction in some specific cases, and there are published articles to support both opposing views. The available guidelines on the extraction of third molars are limited in number, and are mostly tailored to fit specific settings or countries. There are no available guidelines that might be widely used to help in the decision-making process for the international community. We hope this proposal will constitute an important first step toward creating universally accepted guidance.