Interventions for preventing the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading inherited cause of kidney disease. Clinical management has historically focused on symptom control and reducing associated complications. Improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in kidney cyst growth and disease progression has resulted in new pharmaceutical agents targeting disease pathogenesis and preventing disease progression. However, the role of disease-modifying agents for all people with ADPKD is unclear. This is an update of a review first published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions to prevent the progression of ADPKD and the safety based on patient-important endpoints, defined by the Standardised Outcomes in NephroloGy-Polycystic Kidney Disease (SONG-PKD) core outcome set, and general and specific adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplants Register of Studies up to 13 August 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any interventions for preventing the progression of ADPKD with other interventions, placebo, or standard care were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study risks of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effects were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 57 studies (8016 participants) that investigated 18 pharmacological interventions (vasopressin 2 receptor (V2R) antagonists, antihypertensive therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, somatostatin analogues, antiplatelet agents, eicosapentaenoic acids, statins, kinase inhibitors, diuretics, anti-diabetic agents, water intake, dietary intervention, and supplements) in this review. Compared to placebo, the V2R antagonist tolvaptan probably preserves eGFR (3 studies, 2758 participants: MD 1.26 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.78; I2 = 0%) and probably slows total kidney volume (TKV) growth in adults (1 study, 1307 participants: MD -2.70 mL/cm, 95% CI -3.24 to -2.16) (moderate certainty evidence). However, there was insufficient evidence to determine tolvaptan's impact on kidney failure and death. There may be no difference in serious adverse events; however, treatment probably increases nocturia, fatigue and liver enzymes, may increase dry mouth and thirst, and may decrease hypertension and urinary and upper respiratory tract infections. Data on the impact of other therapeutic interventions were largely inconclusive. Compared to placebo, somatostatin analogues probably decrease TKV (6 studies, 500 participants: SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.16; I2 = 11%), probably have little or no effect on eGFR (4 studies, 180 participants: MD 4.11 mL/min/1.73 m3, 95% CI -3.19 to 11.41; I2 = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), and may have little or no effect on kidney failure (2 studies, 405 participants: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.49; I2 = 39%; low certainty evidence). Serious adverse events may increase (2 studies, 405 participants: RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.25; low certainty evidence). Somatostatin analogues probably increase alopecia, diarrhoea or abnormal faeces, dizziness and fatigue but may have little or no effect on anaemia or infection. The effect on death is unclear. Targeted low blood pressure probably results in a smaller per cent annual increase in TKV (1 study, 558 participants: MD -1.00, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.33; moderate certainty evidence) compared to standard blood pressure targets, had uncertain effects on death, but probably do not impact other outcomes such as change in eGFR or adverse events. Kidney failure was not reported. Data comparing antihypertensive agents, mTOR inhibitors, eicosapentaenoic acids, statins, vitamin D compounds, metformin, trichlormethiazide, spironolactone, bosutinib, curcumin, niacinamide, prescribed water intake and antiplatelet agents were sparse and inconclusive. An additional 23 ongoing studies were also identified, including larger phase III RCTs, which will be assessed in a future update of this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although many interventions have been investigated in patients with ADPKD, at present, there is little evidence that they improve patient outcomes. Tolvaptan is the only therapeutic intervention that has demonstrated the ability to slow disease progression, as assessed by eGFR and TKV change. However, it has not demonstrated benefits for death or kidney failure. In order to confirm the role of other therapeutic interventions in ADPKD management, large RCTs focused on patient-centred outcomes are needed. The search identified 23 ongoing studies, which may provide more insight into the role of specific interventions.

The Vasopressin Receptor Antagonist Tolvaptan Counteracts Tumor Growth in a Murine Xenograft Model of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

We have previously demonstrated that the vasopressin type 2 receptor (AVPR2) antagonist tolvaptan reduces cell proliferation and invasion and triggers apoptosis in different human cancer cell lines. To study this effect in vivo, a xenograft model of small cell lung cancer was developed in Fox1nu/nu nude mice through the subcutaneous inoculation of H69 cells, which express AVPR2. One group of mice (n = 5) was treated with tolvaptan for 60 days, whereas one group (n = 5) served as the control. A reduced growth was observed in the tolvaptan group in which the mean tumor volume was significantly smaller on day 60 compared to the control group. In the latter group, a significantly lower survival was observed. The analysis of excised tumors revealed that tolvaptan effectively inhibited the cAMP/PKA and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. The expression of the proliferative marker proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was significantly lower in tumors excised from tolvaptan-treated mice, whereas the expression levels of the apoptotic marker caspase-3 were higher than those in control animals. Furthermore, tumor vascularization was significantly lower in the tolvaptan group. Overall, these findings suggest that tolvaptan counteracts tumor progression in vivo and, if confirmed, might indicate a possible role of this molecule as an adjuvant in anticancer strategies.

Prognostic effect of a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist in acute congestive heart failure patients with hypoperfusion, the wet-cold pattern.

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether the oral vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan has beneficial effects on mortality in real-world congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with hypoperfusion (i.e. the wet-cold pattern), from the viewpoint of cardiorenal syndrome. METHODS: Data on 5511 consecutive CHF patients were extracted from the Tokyo CCU Network data registry. Congestion and hypoperfusion were defined by Nohria-Stevenson clinical profiles at the time of hospitalization. Propensity scores for tolvaptan use were calculated for each patient and used to assemble two matched cohorts of patients receiving tolvaptan or not in the CHF with and without hypoperfusion groups. RESULTS: Of the entire study cohort, 1073 patients (19%) had CHF with hypoperfusion (i.e. the wet-cold pattern). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for CHF patients with than without hypoperfusion (log-rank, P < 0.001). The rate of tolvaptan use did not differ significantly between CHF patients with and without hypoperfusion (15% vs. 14%, respectively; P = 0.7848). In the propensity-matched CHF with hypoperfusion cohort, there was a significant association between the use of tolvaptan and a reduction in in-hospital mortality (log-rank, P = 0.0052). Conversely, in the matched CHF without hypoperfusion cohort, tolvaptan use was not associated with in-hospital mortality (log-rank, P = 0.4417). CONCLUSION: There was a significant association between the use of tolvaptan and a reduction in in-hospital mortality in CHF patients with, but not without, hypoperfusion. These findings hint at possible individualized therapies for patients with CHF.

Impact of Tolvaptan Combined with Low-Dose Dopamine in Heart Failure Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

The impact of tolvaptan and low-dose dopamine on heart failure (HF) patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains uncertain from a clinical standpoint.HF patients with AKI were selected and divided in a 1:1 fashion into the dopamine combined with the tolvaptan group (DTG), the tolvaptan group (TG), and the control group (CG). According to the standard of care, TG received tolvaptan 15 mg orally daily for a week. DTG received combination treatment, including 7 consecutive days of dopamine infusion (2 µg/kg・minutes) and oral tolvaptan 15 mg. Venous blood and urine samples were taken before and after therapy. The primary endpoint was the cardiorenal serological index after 7 days of treatment.Sixty-five patients were chosen randomly for the DTG (22 patients), TG (20 patients), and CG (23 patients), which were similar before the treatment. The serum indexes related to cardiac function (N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin I) in DTG were decreased, compared with TG and CG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the serological markers of renal function (serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) in DTG were lower than those in TG and CG (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among groups.Low-dose dopamine combined with tolvaptan can markedly improve patients' cardiac and renal function. This may be considered a new therapeutic method for HF patients with AKI.

Development, validation and application of a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of OPC-61815 and its metabolites tolvaptan, DM-4103 and DM-4107 in human plasma.

OPC-61815 is an intravenous formulation vasopressin antagonist designed to treat heart failure patients, especially who have difficulty in oral intake. Tolvaptan together with DM-4103 and DM-4107 are considered as the major metabolites of OPC-61815 biotransformed in the liver via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. An efficient and robust ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for quantification of OPC-61815 and its three metabolites in human plasma was developed and fully validated. To our best knowledge, it was the first published method that simultaneously quantified all of these four analytes in only one run. Simple and rapid sample preparation procedure and very short UPLC-MS/MS run time (3.5 min) offered OPC-61815 and its metabolites relatively high throughput detection, which was greatly beneficial to further clinical bio-sample analysis. The method showed good linearity and sufficient sensitivity in the range of 2.00-1000 ng/mL with a low limit of quantitation (2.00 ng/mL) for each analyte. For samples with concentrations above 1000 ng/mL, 100-fold dilution with blank plasma before sample preparation was accepted. High precision and accuracy, high selectivity and satisfactory recovery of this method were demonstrated. For all of the four analytes, no significant matrix effect or carry-over was observed. The stability of analytes and internal standards under different conditions were evaluated to ensure they were stable during the whole period of storage, preparation and detection. Also, re-injection reproducibility was investigated. In addition, the conversion test showed that almost no OPC-61815 converted into DM-4103 and DM-4107 during sample processing, while attention should be paid to the concentration difference between OPC-61815 and tolvaptan in bioanalysis. The developed UPLC-MS/MS method was successfully applied to an open, single and multiple dose administration phase I trial for monitoring the pharmacokinetics of OPC-61815. This work provided a promising way for further pharmacokinetic study of OPC-61815.

Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate to Evaluate Rapid Progression and Changes over Time in Autosomal Polycystic Kidney Disease: Potential Impact on Therapeutic Decision-Making.

Autosomal polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic form of kidney failure, reflecting unmet needs in management. Prescription of the only approved treatment (tolvaptan) is limited to persons with rapidly progressing ADPKD. Rapid progression may be diagnosed by assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline, usually estimated (eGFR) from equations based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr) or cystatin-C (eGFRcys). We have assessed the concordance between eGFR decline and identification of rapid progression (rapid eGFR loss), and measured GFR (mGFR) declines (rapid mGFR loss) using iohexol clearance in 140 adults with ADPKD with ≥3 mGFR and eGFRcr assessments, of which 97 also had eGFRcys assessments. The agreement between mGFR and eGFR decline was poor: mean concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) between the method declines were low (0.661, range 0.628 to 0.713), and Bland and Altman limits of agreement between eGFR and mGFR declines were wide. CCC was lower for eGFRcys. From a practical point of view, creatinine-based formulas failed to detect rapid mGFR loss (-3 mL/min/y or faster) in around 37% of the cases. Moreover, formulas falsely indicated around 40% of the cases with moderate or stable decline as rapid progressors. The reliability of formulas in detecting real mGFR decline was lower in the non-rapid-progressors group with respect to that in rapid-progressor patients. The performance of eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys equations was even worse. In conclusion, eGFR decline may misrepresent mGFR decline in ADPKD in a significant percentage of patients, potentially misclassifying them as progressors or non-progressors and impacting decisions of initiation of tolvaptan therapy.

Clinical efficacy of tolvaptan in acute decompensated heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the LOHAS registry.

BACKGROUND: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are risk factors of hemodynamic instability in heart failure (HF) management due to low cardiac output, respectively. Therefore, the treatment of HF due to severe AS complicated with AF is anticipated to be difficult. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor inhibitor, is effective in controlling acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with hemodynamic stability. However, its clinical efficacy against ADHF caused by AS with AF remains to be determined. METHODS: Clinical information (from September 2014 to December 2017) of 59 patients diagnosed with ADHF due to severe AS (20 patients with AF; 39 patients with sinus rhythm [SR]) was obtained from the LOHAS registry. The registry collected data from seven hospitals and assessed the short-term effects of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for ADHF with severe AS. We attempted to identify clinical differences from baseline up to 4 days, comparing patients with AF (AF group) versus those with SR (SR group). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in age (83.7 ± 4.5 vs. 85.8 ± 6.9 years, respectively; p = 0.11) and aortic valve area (0.60 [0.46-0.73] vs. 0.56 [0.37-0.70] cm2, respectively; p = 0.50). However, left atrial volume was larger (104 [85-126] vs. 87 [64-103] mL, respectively; p < 0.01), whereas stroke volume was lower (51.6 ± 14.8 vs. 59.0 ± 18.7 mL, respectively; p = 0.08) in the AF group versus the SR group. Body weight decreased daily from baseline up to day 4 in both groups (from 55.4 to 53.2 kg [p < 0.01] and from 53.5 to 51.0 kg [p < 0.01], respectively) without change in heart rate. Notably, the systolic blood pressure decreased slightly in the AF group after 2 days of treatment with tolvaptan. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with tolvaptan improved HF in patients hospitalized for severe AS, regardless of the presence of AF or SR. After achieving sufficient diuresis, a slight decrease in blood pressure was observed in the AF group, suggesting an appropriate timeframe for safe and effective use of tolvaptan.

Juxtaglomerular apparatus-mediated homeostatic mechanisms: therapeutic implication for chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA)-mediated homeostatic mechanism links to how sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) slow progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may link to how tolvaptan slows renal function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). AREA COVERED: JGA-mediated homeostatic mechanism has been hypothesized based on investigations of tubuloglomerular feedback and renin-angiotensin system. We reviewed clinical trials of SGLT2is and tolvaptan to assess the relationship between this mechanism and these drugs. EXPERT OPINION: When sodium load to macula densa (MD) increases, MD increases adenosine production, constricting afferent arteriole (Af-art) and protecting glomeruli. Concurrently, MD signaling suppresses renin secretion, increases urinary sodium excretion, and counterbalances reduced sodium filtration. However, when there is marked increase in sodium load per-nephron, as in advanced CKD, MD adenosine production increases, relaxing Af-art and maintaining sodium homeostasis at the expense of glomeruli. The beneficial effects of tolvaptan on renal function in ADPKD may also depend on the JGA-mediated homeostatic mechanisms since tolvaptan inhibits sodium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb.The JGA-mediated homeostatic mechanism regulates Af-arts, constricting to relaxing according to homeostatic needs. Understanding this mechanism may contribute to the development of pharmacotherapeutic compounds and better care for patients with CKD.

Case report: Secondary failure to tolvaptan in a patient with SCLC and paraneoplastic SIADH.

The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is frequent in lung cancer patients. Here, we report a case with persistent hyponatremia, which suggested malignant SIADH and facilitated an early diagnosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A combined radio-chemotherapy led to a partial remission and resolution of SIADH. An early relapse was indicated by reoccurring severe hyponatremia and increased copeptin levels, which were used as surrogate markers for the antidiuretic hormone (ADH). As palliative immunochemotherapy, together with fluid restriction and solute substitution, were unable to control hyponatremia, treatment with the ADH V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan was initiated. Over time, the dose of tolvaptan needed to be increased, paralleled by a well-documented exponential increase of copeptin levels. In summary and conclusion, this is a rare case of a secondary failure to tolvaptan with unique documentary evidence of increasing copeptin levels. This observation supports the hypothesis that exceedingly high ADH levels may lead to competitive displacement of tolvaptan from the V2 receptor.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the long-term use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is limited. The aim was to evaluate the tolvaptan effectiveness and safety in real clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center observational study (2016-2022) involving ADPKD patients treated with tolvaptan was conducted. Annual change in serum creatinine (sCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after treatment initiation were evaluated. Change in total kidney volume (TKV), blood pressure (BP) and urinary albuminuria at 12, 24 and 36 months after initiation were also determined. Adverse events (AEs) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were included. No significant differences pre- vs post tolvaptan treatment in annual rate of change in eGFR (-3.52ml/min/1.73m2 [-4.98%] vs -3.98ml/min/1.73m2 [-8.48%], p=0.121) and sCr (+0.06mg/dL [4.22%] vs +0.15mg/dL [7.77%], p=0.429) were observed. Tolvaptan improved urinary osmolality at 12 (p=0.019) and 24 months (p=0.008), but not at 36 months (p=0.11). There were no changes in TKV, BP control and urinary albuminuria at 12, 24 or 36 months. A worse response was shown in patients with rapid kidney function decline (p=0.042). A 36.4% of the patients developed grade III/IV AEs. A 22.7% discontinued treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a modest benefit of tolvaptan in ADPKD patients, as well as safety concerns.

Tolvaptan therapy for edema in patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Tolvaptan is a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed to alleviate edema associated with renal diseases. However, the clinical benefits of tolvaptan in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tolvaptan in managing edema caused by CKD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy and treatment regimen of tolvaptan were assessed in a cohort of 96 patients with renal edema and CKD. During the treatment, the patients' creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were monitored as important indicators of kidney function. Coagulation-associated molecules including fibrinogen, D-dimer, and fibrin degradation products (FDPs) were measured. Electrolyte disorders and acute kidney injury were closely monitored. Tolvaptan was administered at a daily dose of 7.5 mg, and 30 mg of edoxaban was administered to manage deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: During the course of tolvaptan therapy, the eGFR of the patients was not declined. Edema was eliminated in 82.18% of patients. Proteinuria was reduced in the patients (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in serum sodium levels throughout treatment, and no significant difference was observed in blood volume between the end of treatment and baseline levels. Importantly, acute kidney injury did not occur, and renal edema and deep vein thrombosis were successfully treated. CONCLUSION: As long as a rational treatment regimen is followed, tolvaptan is a safe and effective diuretic for treating edema in CKD, even in the late stages of CKD without reducing residual renal function in the patients.

Visceral Adiposity and Progression of ADPKD: A Cohort Study of Patients From the TEMPO 3:4 Trial.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Body mass index (BMI) is an independent predictor of kidney disease progression in individuals with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Adipocytes do not simply act as a fat reservoir but are active endocrine organs. We hypothesized that greater visceral abdominal adiposity would associate with more rapid kidney growth in ADPKD and influence the efficacy of tolvaptan. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 1,053 patients enrolled in the TEMPO 3:4 tolvaptan trial with ADPKD and at high risk of rapid disease progression. PREDICTOR: Estimates of visceral adiposity extracted from coronal plane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using deep learning. OUTCOME: Annual change in total kidney volume (TKV) and effect of tolvaptan on kidney growth. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multinomial logistic regression and linear mixed models. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, the highest tertile of visceral adiposity was associated with greater odds of annual change in TKV of≥7% versus<5% (odds ratio [OR], 4.78 [95% CI, 3.03-7.47]). The association was stronger in women than men (interaction P<0.01). In linear mixed models with an outcome of percent change in TKV per year, tolvaptan efficacy (% change in TKV) was reduced with higher visceral adiposity (3-way interaction of treatment ∗ time ∗ visceral adiposity, P=0.002). Visceral adiposity significantly improved classification performance of predicting rapid annual percent change in TKV for individuals with a normal BMI (DeLong's test z score: -2.03; P=0.04). Greater visceral adiposity was not associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope in the overall cohort; however, visceral adiposity was associated with more rapid decline in eGFR slope (below the median) in women (fully adjusted OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11] per 10 unit increase in visceral adiposity) but not men (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.95-1.02]). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective; rapid progressors; computational demand of deep learning. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral adiposity that can be quantified by MRI in the coronal plane using a deep learning segmentation model independently associates with more rapid kidney growth and improves classification of rapid progression in individuals with a normal BMI. Tolvaptan efficacy decreases with increasing visceral adiposity. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We analyzed images from a previous study with the drug tolvaptan conducted in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) to measure the amount of fat tissue surrounding the kidneys (visceral fat). We had previously shown body mass index can predict kidney growth in this population; now we determined whether visceral fat was an important factor associated with kidney growth. Using a machine learning tool to automate measurement of fat in images, we observed that visceral fat was independently associated with kidney growth, that it was a better predictor of faster kidney growth in lean patients than body mass index, and that having more visceral fat made treatment of ADPKD with tolvaptan less effective.

The screening, diagnosis, and management of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A national consensus statement from Taiwan.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ADPKD in Taiwan remains unavailable. In this consensus statement, we summarize updated information on clinical features of international and domestic patients with ADPKD, followed by suggestions for optimal diagnosis and care in Taiwan. Specifically, counselling for at-risk minors and reproductive issues can be important, including ethical dilemmas surrounding prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Studies reveal that ADPKD typically remains asymptomatic until the fourth decade of life, with symptoms resulting from cystic expansion with visceral compression, or rupture. The diagnosis can be made based on a detailed family history, followed by imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging). Genetic testing is reserved for atypical cases mostly. Common tools for prognosis prediction include total kidney volume, Mayo classification and PROPKD/genetic score. Screening and management of complications such as hypertension, proteinuria, urological infections, intracranial aneurysms, are also crucial for improving outcome. We suggest that the optimal management strategies of patients with ADPKD include general medical care, dietary recommendations and ADPKD-specific treatments. Key points include rigorous blood pressure control, dietary sodium restriction and Tolvaptan use, whereas the evidence for somatostatin analogues and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors remains limited. In summary, we outline an individualized care plan emphasizing careful monitoring of disease progression and highlight the need for shared decision-making among these patients.

Long-Residence Time Peptide Antagonist for the Vasopressin V2 Receptor to Treat Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

The dysregulated intracellular cAMP in the kidneys drives cystogenesis and progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Mounting evidence supports that vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) antagonism effectively reduces cAMP levels, validating this receptor as a therapeutic target. Tolvaptan, an FDA-approved V2R antagonist, shows limitations in its clinical efficacy for ADPKD treatment. Therefore, the pursuit of better-in-class V2R antagonists with an improved efficacy remains pressing. Herein, we synthesized a set of peptide V2R antagonists. Peptide 33 exhibited a high binding affinity for the V2R (Ki = 6.1 ± 1.5 nM) and an extended residence time of 20 ± 1 min, 2-fold that of tolvaptan. This prolonged interaction translated into sustained suppression of cAMP production in washout experiments. Furthermore, peptide 33 exhibited improved efficacies over tolvaptan in both ex vivo and in vivo models of ADPKD, underscoring its potential as a promising lead compound for the treatment of ADPKD.

Renal ultrasonography predicts worsening renal function in patients with heart failure under tolvaptan administration.

AIMS: Renal dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure predicts a poor prognosis. Tolvaptan has a diuretic effect in patients with chronic kidney disease and heart failure without adverse effects on renal function. We aimed to determine the effects of tolvaptan and predictors of worsening renal function in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This post hoc analysis was a sub-analysis of a single-centre prospectively randomized trial on the early and short-term tolvaptan administration. We enrolled 201 participants with decompensated heart failure between January 2014 and March 2019 (early group, n = 104; age: 79.0 ± 12.8 years; late group, n = 97; age: 80.3 ± 10.8 years). Renal ultrasonography was performed before and after the administration of tolvaptan. Urine output and oral water intake significantly increased during tolvaptan administration. The difference between water intake and urine volume increased during tolvaptan administration. Changes in body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in both groups were comparable. The changes in peak-systolic velocity (PSV), acceleration time (AT) of the renal arteries, and resistance index were comparable. The changes in PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of the interlobar arteries increased following tolvaptan administration (Δmax PSV: 0.0 ± 14.8 cm/s before tolvaptan vs. 5.6 ± 15.7 cm/s after tolvaptan, P = 0.002; Δmean PSV: 0.4 ± 12.3 vs. 4.9 ± 12.7 cm/s, P = 0.002; Δmax EDV: -0.2 ± 3.5 vs. 1.4 ± 4.0 cm/s, P = 0.001; Δmean EDV: -0.0 ± 3.1 vs. 1.1 ± 3.4 cm/s, P = 0.003). The renal artery AT was negatively correlated with the eGFR (Δmax AT: beta = -0.2354, P = 0.044; Δmean AT: beta = -0.2477, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan increased the PSV and EDV of the interlobar artery, which may mean tolvaptan increased renal blood flow. The renal artery AT may be a surrogate for worsening renal function.

Additional renoprotective effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in a patient with ADPKD receiving tolvaptan treatment.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a major cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Vasopressin plays a pivotal role in ADPKD progression; therefore, the selective vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan is used as a key drug in the management of ADPKD. On the other hand, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), which may possibly stimulate vasopressin secretion due to the diuretic effect of the drug, have been shown to have both renal and cardioprotective effects in various populations, including those with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. However, the effect of SGLT2i in patients with ADPKD have not been fully elucidated. Herein, we report the case of a patient with ADPKD on tolvaptan who was administered the SGLT2i dapagliflozin. The patient was a Japanese woman diagnosed with ADPKD at age 30. Despite the treatment with tolvaptan, eGFR was gradually declined from 79.8 to 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 in almost 5 years and 10 mg of dapagliflozin was initiated in the hope of renoprotective effects. Although a small increase in vasopressin levels was observed, eGFR decline rate was moderated after dapagliflozin initiation. This case suggested an additional renoprotective effect of dapagliflozin in patient with ADPKD receiving tolvaptan. Although there is no evidence about the renal protective effect of SGLT2i in patients with ADPKD, we hereby report a case successfully treated with dapagliflozin for approximately 2 years. Further research, including clinical trials, is needed to evaluate whether SGLT2i are effective in patients with ADPKD.