Needlessly Treated: Evaluation of Prehospital Needle Thoracostomy.

BACKGROUND: Needle thoracostomy is a potentially life-saving intervention for tension pneumothorax but may be overused, potentially leading to unnecessary morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To review prehospital needle thoracostomy indications, effectiveness, and adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on registry data for a United States Midwestern Level I trauma center for a 7.5-year period (January 2015 to May 2022). Included were patients who received prehospital needle thoracostomy and trauma activation before hospital arrival. The primary outcomes were correct indications and improvement in vital signs. Secondary outcomes were the need for chest tubes, correct needle placement, complications, and survival. RESULTS: A total of n = 67 patients were reviewed, of which n = 63 (94%) received a prehospital thoracostomy. Of the 63 prehospital thoracostomies, 54 (86%) survived to arrival. Of these 54, 44 (n = 81%) had documented reduced/absent breath sounds, 15 (28%) hypotension, and 19 (35%) with difficulty breathing/ventilating. Only four patients met all three prehospital trauma life support criteria: hypotension, difficulty ventilating, and absent breath sounds. There were no significant changes in prehospital vitals before and after receiving needle thoracostomy. In patients receiving imaging (n = 54), there was evidence of 15 (28%) lung lacerations, 6 (11%) of which had a pneumothorax and 3 (5%) near misses of important structures. Review of needle catheters visible on computer tomography imaging found 11 outside the chest and 1 in the abdominal cavity. CONCLUSION: The study presents evidence of potential needle thoracostomy overuse and morbidity. Adherence to specific guidelines for needle decompression is needed.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the postresuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover IHCA study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. OBJECTIVES: Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individuals enrolling in hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study collects data on patient characteristics, including prearrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on postarrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures postarrest temperature control interventions and postarrest prognostication methods. RESULTS: The majority of participating hospital systems are large, academic, tertiary care centers serving urban populations. The analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA and be a vital resource for future investigations into best practices for managing patients after IHCA.

A Multidisciplinary Curriculum to Standardize Chest Procedures Training for Trainees in General Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Critical Care.

Introduction: Critical care, emergency medicine, and surgical trainees frequently perform surgical and Seldinger-technique tube thoracostomy, thoracentesis, and thoracic ultrasound. However, approaches to teaching these skills are highly heterogeneous. Over 10 years, we have developed a standardized, multidisciplinary curriculum to teach these procedures. Methods: Emergency medicine residents, surgical residents, and critical care fellows, all in the first year of their respective programs, underwent training in surgical and Seldinger chest tube placement and securement, thoracentesis, and thoracic ultrasound. The curriculum included preworkshop instructional videos and 45-minute in-person practice stations (3.5 hours total). Sessions were co-led by faculty from emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, and pulmonary/critical care who performed real-time formative assessment with standardized procedural steps. Postcourse surveys assessed learners' confidence before versus after the workshop in each procedure, learners' evaluations of faculty by station and specialty, and the workshop overall. Results: One hundred twenty-three trainees completed course evaluations, demonstrating stable and positive responses from learners of different backgrounds taught by a multidisciplinary group of instructors, as well as statistically significant improvement in learner confidence in each procedure. Over time, we have made incremental changes to our curriculum based on feedback from instructors and learners. Discussion: We have developed a unique curriculum designed, revised, and taught by a multidisciplinary faculty over many years to teach a unified approach to the performance of common chest procedures to surgical, emergency medicine, and critical care trainees. Our curriculum can be readily adapted to the needs of institutions that desire a standardized, multidisciplinary approach to thoracic procedural education.

Bilothorax: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review of the Rare Entity.

Background: Bilothorax is defined as the presence of bile in the pleural space. It is a rare condition, and diagnosis is confirmed with a pleural fluid-to-serum bilirubin ratio of >1. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases were searched using predetermined Boolean parameters. The systematic literature review was done per PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective studies, case series, case reports, and conference abstracts were included. The patients with reported pleural fluid analyses were pooled for fluid parameter data analysis. Results: Of 838 articles identified through the inclusion criteria and removing 105 duplicates, 732 articles were screened with abstracts, and 285 were screened for full article review. After this, 123 studies qualified for further detailed review, and of these, 115 were pooled for data analysis. The mean pleural fluid and serum bilirubin levels were 72 mg/dL and 61 mg/dL, respectively, with a mean pleural fluid-to-serum bilirubin ratio of 3.47. In most cases, the bilothorax was reported as a subacute or remote complication of hepatobiliary surgery or procedure, and traumatic injury to the chest or abdomen was the second most common cause. Tube thoracostomy was the main treatment modality (73.83%), followed by serial thoracentesis. Fifty-two patients (51.30%) had associated bronchopleural fistulas. The mortality was considerable, with 18/115 (15.65%) reported death. Most of the patients with mortality had advanced hepatobiliary cancer and were noted to die of complications not related to bilothorax. Conclusion: Bilothorax should be suspected in patients presenting with pleural effusion following surgical manipulation of hepatobiliary structures or a traumatic injury to the chest. This review is registered with CRD42023438426.

Delayed hemothorax following blunt thoracic trauma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Late hemothorax is a rare complication of blunt chest trauma. The longest reported time interval between the traumatic event and the development of hemothorax is 44 days. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly patient with right-sided rib fractures from chest trauma, managed initially with closed thoracostomy, presented with a delayed hemothorax that occurred 60 days after initial management, necessitating conservative and then surgical intervention due to the patient's frail condition and associated complications. CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the clinical challenge and significance of delayed hemothorax in chest trauma, highlighting the need for vigilance and potential surgical correction in complex presentations, especially in the elderly.

Is there a change in the view of treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax?: The effect of thoracic CT and autologous blood pleurodesis: a retrospective cohort study.

This study investigated recurrence rates and treatment efficacy based on tomographic findings during a long-term follow-up after primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) treatment. We retrospectively analyzed patients with PSP treated at our hospital between 2003 and 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings: group 1 (no bulla/bleb) and group 2 (bullae-bleb <3 cm). Data on demographics, recurrence, treatment methods, and outcomes were also collected and compared. A total of 251 PSP cases were evaluated, predominantly male (93.6%) with a mean age of 29.23 ±â€…1.14 years. Most cases (57%) occurred on the right side. Recurrence rates were highest within the first year (77.8%), with the first and second recurrences occurring at rates of 26% and 27.3%, respectively. In group 1 (n = 117), conservative treatment was applied in 15 cases, tube thoracostomy in 81, autologous blood pleurodesis (ABP) in 19, and surgery in 12. Recurrence rates were 46.6%, 21%, 5.3%, and 8.3%, respectively. In group 2 (n = 134), the recurrence rates were 50%, 32.7%, 20%, and 3.1%, respectively (P < .001). No mortality was observed for any patient. The treatment groups included conservative (n = 19), thoracostomy (n = 179), ABP (n = 34), and surgical (n = 44) groups. Recurrence rates were 47.3%, 27.4%, 11.8% (group 1: 5.3%, group 2: 20%, P = .035), and 4.5% (0% vs 6.3%), respectively. ABP effectively reduced recurrence in group 1 PSP patients without bullae or blebs on CT, potentially avoiding surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery should be preferred in group 2 cases with bullae or blebs to minimize recurrence. These results underscore the importance of tailoring treatment strategies based on CT findings to optimize PSP management outcomes.

A Novel Technique for Temporally Securing a Chest Tube in a Resource-Limited Environment.

In the prehospital, transport, and resource-limited setting, patients with traumatic hemothorax, pneumothorax, or cardiac arrest require emergency tube thoracostomy for stabilization and transport. With the possibility of multiple patients, limited providers, and inability to commit a 1:1 provider-to-patient ratio for safe tubeless thoracostomies, a chest tube is often the safest option. Mercy Health Life Flight Air Medical program has developed practice over decades using towel clamps and tape to achieve securement rapidly and reliably. We report on this subject as an option for temporarily securing a chest tube in the disaster, resource-poor, prehospital, or critical care transport setting.

An Analysis of Tube Thoracostomy in Combat Implications for Improved Prehospital Recognition and Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic trauma occurs frequently in combat and is associated with high mortality. Tube thoracostomy (chest tube) is the treatment for pneumothorax resulting from thoracic trauma, but little data exist to characterize combat casualties undergoing this intervention. We sought to describe the incidence of these injuries and procedures to inform training and materiel development priorities. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) data set from 2007 to 2020 describing prehospital care within all theaters in the registry. We described all casualties who received a tube thoracostomy within 24 hours of admission to a military treatment facility. Variables described included casualty demographics; abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score by body region, presented as binary serious (=3) or not serious (<3); and prehospital interventions. RESULTS: The database identified 25,897 casualties, 2,178 (8.4%) of whom received a tube thoracostomy within 24 hours of admission. Of those casualties, the body regions with the highest proportions of common serious injury (AIS >3) were thorax 62% (1,351), extremities 29% (629), abdomen 22% (473), and head/neck 22% (473). Of those casualties, 13% (276) had prehospital needle thoracostomies performed, and 19% (416) had limb tourniquets placed. Most of the patients were male (97%), partner forces members or humanitarian casualties (70%), and survived to discharge (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Combat casualties with chest trauma often have multiple injuries complicating prehospital and hospital care. Explosions and gunshot wounds are common mechanisms of injury associated with the need for tube thoracostomy, and these interventions are often performed by enlisted medical personnel. Future efforts should be made to provide a correlation between chest interventions and pneumothorax management in prehospital thoracic trauma.

Comparing Chest Tube Thoracostomy in East Tennessee Trauma Centers: A Prospective Study Highlighting Differences in Urban vs Rural Locations.

Chest tube thoracostomy (CTT) is essential for lung expansion, but protocol discrepancies exist across trauma centers. This prospective study compared CTT protocols between an urban (center 1) and rural (center 2) level 1 trauma center in East Tennessee from June to August 2023. 66 trauma patients required CTT (51 from center 1 and 15 from center 2). Diagnostic practices and post-pull chest X-rays (CXR) differed significantly. Center 1 favored CXR for diagnosis (P = 0.012), while center 2 relied more on clinical presentation (P = 0.012). Post-pull CXR was less common at center 2 (P = 0.012). Center 2 had lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P = 0.028), shorter tube duration (P = 0.044), and more needle thoracostomy use (P = 0.393). These findings underscore the need for regional protocols considering pre-arrival factors, hospital practices, and injury patterns. Protocol adjustments aim to improve adherence and patient outcomes, with ongoing data collection exploring factors influencing protocol evolution.

Ultrasound Investigation of the Fifth Intercostal Space Landmark for Chest Tube Thoracostomy Site Selection in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Chest tube thoracostomy site selection is typically chosen through landmark identification of the fifth intercostal space (ICS). Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), studies have shown this site to be potentially unsafe in many adults; however, no study has evaluated this in children. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the fifth ICS for pediatric chest tube placement, with the secondary aim to identify patient factors that correlate with an unsafe fifth ICS. METHODS: This was an observational study using POCUS to evaluate the safety of the fifth ICS for chest tube thoracostomy placement using a convenience sample of pediatric emergency department patients. Safety was defined as the absence of the diaphragm appearing within or above the fifth ICS during either tidal or maximal respiration. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify patient factors that correlated with an unsafe fifth ICS. RESULTS: Among all patients, 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.45-16.1) of diaphragm measurements crossed into or above the fifth ICS during tidal respiration and 27.2% (95% CI 19.0-37.3) during maximal respiration. The diaphragm crossed the fifth ICS more frequently on the right when compared with the left, with an overall rate of 45.0% (95% CI 36.1-54.3) of right diaphragms crossing during maximal respiration. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, a 1-kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was associated with an increase of 10% or more in the odds of crossing during both tidal and maximal respiration ( P = 0.003 or less). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of pediatric patients have diaphragms that cross into or above the fifth ICS, suggesting that placement of a chest tube thoracostomy at this site would pose a significant complication risk. POCUS can quickly and accurately identify these unsafe sites, and we recommend it be used before pediatric chest tube thoracostomy.

Thoracic Ultrasound for Detection of Pneumothorax Following Thoracostomy Tube Removal in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for pneumothorax (PTX) is standard practice after thoracostomy tube removal, with postpull CXR being the gold standard. However, studies have shown that point-of-care thoracic ultrasound (POCTUS) is effective at detecting PTX and may represent a viable alternative. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POCTUS for evaluation of clinically significant postpull PTX compared with chest x-ray (CXR). METHODS: We performed a prospective, cohort study at a Level 1 trauma center between April and December 2022 comparing the ability of POCTUS to detect clinically significant postpull PTX compared with CXR. Patients with thoracostomy tube placed for PTX, hemothorax, or hemopneumothorax were included. Clinically insignificant PTX was defined as a small residual or apical PTX without associated respiratory symptoms or need for thoracostomy tube replacement while clinically significant PTX were moderate to large or associated with physiologic change. RESULTS: We included 82 patients, the most common etiology was blunt trauma (n = 57), and the indications for thoracostomy tube placement were: PTX (n = 38), hemothorax (n = 15), and hemopneumothorax (n = 14). One patient required thoracostomy tube replacement for recurrent PTX identified by both ultrasound and X-ray. Thoracic ultrasound had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 60%, and negative predictive value of 100% for the detection of clinically significant postpull PTX. CONCLUSIONS: The use of POCTUS for the detection of clinically significant PTX after thoracostomy tube removal is a safe and effective alternative to standard CXR. This echoes similar studies and emphasizes the need for further investigation in a multicenter study.

Does pre-injury anticoagulation make chest tubes any less safe? A nationwide retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation is becoming more common with the aging population, which raises concern for the risk of invasive procedures that can cause bleeding, such as chest tube placement (thoracostomy). With the increase in CT imaging, more pneumothoraces and hemothoraces are being identified. The relative risk of thoracostomy in the presence of anticoagulation is not well-established. The objective of this study was to determine whether pre-injury anticoagulation affects the relative risk of tube thoracostomy following significant chest trauma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the 2019 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Program (ACS-TQP) database using R version 4.2.2. Data from the database was filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes were then assessed with the population of interest. Demographics, vitals, comorbidities, and injury parameters were also collected for each patient. This study included all adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with traumatic hemothorax, pneumothorax, or hemopneumothorax. Patients with missing data in demographics, vitals, comorbidities, injury parameters, or outcomes, as well as those with no signs of life upon arrival, were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they had pre-injury anticoagulation and whether they had a chest tube placed in the hospital. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Logistic and standard regressions were used by a statistician to control for age, sex, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: Our study population included 72,385 patients (4250 with pre-injury anticoagulation and 68,135 without pre-injury anticoagulation). Pre-injury anticoagulation and thoracostomy were each independently associated with increased mortality and LOS. However, there was a non-significant interaction term between pre-injury anticoagulation and thoracostomy for both outcomes, indicating that their combined effects on mortality and LOS did not differ significantly from the sum of their individual effects. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both pre-injury anticoagulation and thoracostomy are risk factors for mortality and increased LOS in adult patients presenting with hemothorax, pneumothorax, or hemopneumothorax, but they do not interact with each other. We recommend further study of this phenomenon to potentially improve clinical guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

[Surgical Experience with Three Cases of Open-window Thoracostomy for Chronic Empyema Under Local Anesthesia].

We may encounter patients with chronic empyema for whom open-window thoracostomy is unavoidable. However, patients with chronic empyema are sometimes at high-risk for surgery under general anesthesia. We, herein, present our surgical experience with three chronic empyema cases who underwent open-window thoracostomy under local anesthesia. Indications for open-window thoracostomy under local anesthesia were raised PaCO2 in Case 1, old age and poor performance status in Case 2, and a history of esophageal reconstruction and vocal cordoplasty in Case 3. All patients were well during the surgery. Case 1 developed type 2 respiratory failure postoperatively and had to be put on a ventilator, but finally recuperated. The sedatives used could have exacerbated raised PaCO2 in this patient, and careful selection of anesthetic agents is mandatory. Considering pain and stress that patients suffer during open-window thoracostomy under local anesthesia, case selection is necessary. Nevertheless, we believe that open-window thoracostomy under local anesthesia is an effective option for high-risk patients.

Successful Needle Aspiration of a Traumatic Pneumothorax: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) occurs in up to 50% of patients with severe polytrauma and chest injuries. Patients with a traumatic PTX with clinical signs of tension physiology and hemodynamic instability are typically treated with an urgent decompressive thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy, or needle decompression. There is recent evidence that non-breathless patients with a hemodynamically stable traumatic PTX can be managed conservatively through observation or a percutaneous pigtail catheter. We present here a 52-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with a 55 mm traumatic PTX. Following aspiration of 1500 mL of air, a clinical improvement was immediately observed, allowing the patient to be discharged shortly thereafter. In hemodynamically stable patients with a post-traumatic PTX, without specific risk factors or oxygen desaturation, observation or simple needle aspiration can be a reasonable approach. Although the recent medical literature supports conservative management of small traumatic PTXs, guidelines are lacking for hemodynamically stable patients with a significantly large PTX. This case report documents our successful experience with needle aspiration in such a setting of large traumatic PTX. We aimed in this article to review the available literature on needle aspiration and conservative treatment of traumatic pneumothorax. A total of 12 studies were selected out of 190 articles on traumatic PTX where conservative treatment and chest tube decompression were compared. Our case report offers a novel contribution by illustrating the successful resolution of a sizable pneumothorax through needle aspiration, suggesting that even a large PTX in a hemodynamically stable patient, without other risk conditions, can be successfully treated conservatively with simple needle aspiration in order to avoid tube thoracostomy complications.

Chest Tube Size Selection: Evaluating Provider Practices, Treatment Efficacy, and Complications in Management of Thoracic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The standard for managing traumatic pneumothorax (PTX), hemothorax (HTX), and hemopneumothorax (HPTX) has historically been large-bore (LB) chest tubes (>20-Fr). Previous studies have shown equal efficacy of small-bore (SB) chest tubes (≤19-Fr) in draining PTX and HTX/HPTX. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, treatment efficacy, and complications related to the selection of chest tube sizes for patients with thoracic trauma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for traumatic PTX, HTX, or HPTX at a Level 1 Trauma Center from January 2016 to December 2021. Comparison was made between SB and LB thoracostomy tubes. The primary outcome was indication for chest tube placement based on injury pattern. Secondary outcomes included retained hemothorax, insertion-related complications, and duration of chest tube placement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-one patients were included and 297 (87.1%) received LB tubes. No significant differences were found between the groups concerning tube failure and insertion-related complications. LB tubes were more frequently placed in patients with penetrating MOI, higher average ISS, and higher average thoracic AIS. Patients who received LB chest tubes experienced a higher incidence of retained HTX. DISCUSSION: In patients with thoracic trauma, both SB and LB chest tubes may be used for treatment. SB tubes are typically placed in nonemergent situations, and there is apparent provider bias for LB tubes. A future randomized clinical trial is needed to provide additional data on the usage of SB tubes in emergent situations.

Surgical approach and presence of preoperative pleural effusion impact thoracostomy tube usage in dogs and cats following thoracic surgery for suspected neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with increased pleural fluid and air evacuation, longer duration of thoracostomy tube usage, and longer hospitalization in dogs and cats following surgery for thoracic neoplasms. ANIMALS: 62 dogs and 10 cats. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for dogs and cats undergoing thoracic surgeries between August 1, 2019, and June 30, 2023, for resection of suspected neoplasia in which a thoracostomy tube was placed. Data collected included patient signalment, type of procedure performed, histologic diagnosis of the primary mass removed, volume of fluid and air evacuated from the thoracostomy tube, and time in hospital. RESULTS: Median sternotomy was associated with increased total fluid evacuation (median, 12.1 mL/kg; IQR, 15.4 mL/kg; P = .012), whereas rib resection was associated with increased total air evacuation (median, 2.1 mL/kg; IQR, 13.6 mL/kg; P = .06). The presence of preoperative pleural effusion was associated with higher total fluid evacuation (20.6 mL/kg; IQR, 32.1 mL/kg; P = .009), longer duration with a thoracostomy tube in place (42.5 hours; IQR, 41.9 hours; P = .027), and longer hospitalization period (61 hours; IQR, 52.8 hours; P = .025). Cats had a thoracostomy tube in place for a longer time compared to dogs (median, 42.6 hours; IQR, 23.5 hours; P = .043). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Animals undergoing median sternotomy and rib resection may be expected to have higher fluid and air volumes, respectively, evacuated postoperatively. This often leads to an increased duration of thoracostomy tube usage and a longer period of hospitalization.

Late video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracostomy tube reinsertion for retained hemothorax after penetrating trauma, a prospective randomized control study.

BACKGROUND: Early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the recommended treatment of choice for retained hemothorax (RH). A prospective single-center randomized control study was conducted to compare outcomes between VATS and thoracostomy tube (TT) reinsertion for patients with RH after penetrating trauma in a resource constrained unit. Our hypothesis was that patients with a RH receiving VATS instead of TT reinsertion would have a shorter hospital stay and lesser complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to November 2019, stable patients with thoracic penetrating trauma complicated with retained hemothoraces were randomized to either VATS or TT reinsertion. The outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications. RESULTS: Out of the 77 patients assessed for eligibility, 65 patients were randomized and 62 analyzed: 30 in the VATS arm and 32 in the TT reinsertion arm. Demographics and mechanisms of injury were comparable between the two arms. Length of hospital stay was: preprocedure: VATS 6.8 (+/-2.8) days and TT 6.6 (+/- 2.4) days (p = 0.932) and postprocedure: VATS 5.1 (+/-2.3) days, TT 7.1 (+/-6.3) days (p = 0.459), total LOS VATS 12 (+/- 3.9) days, and TT 14.4 (+/-7) days (p = 0.224). The TT arm had 15 complications compared to the VATS arm of four (p = 0.004). There were two additional procedures in the VATS arm and 10 in the TT arm (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: VATS proved to be the better treatment modality for RH with fewer complications and less need of additional procedures, while the LOS between the two groups was not statistically different.

Retreatment after primary spontaneous pneumothoraxes managed with primary tube thoracostomy or surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a paucity of data on later healthcare visits and retreatments after primary treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. The main purpose of this study was to describe retreatment rates up to 5 years after primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated with either surgery or tube thoracostomy (TT) at index hospitalization in Finland between 2005 and 2018 to estimate the burden of primary spontaneous pneumothorax on the healthcare system. METHODS: Retrospective registry-based study of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated with TT or surgery in Finland in 2005-2018. Rehospitalization and retreatment for recurrent pneumothorax and complications attributable to initial treatment were identified. RESULTS: The total study population was 1594 patients. At 5 years, 53.2% (384/722) of TT treated and 33.8% (295/872) of surgically treated patients had undergone any retreatment. Surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence than TT (hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.56, p < 0.001). Male sex was associated with a lower risk of recurrent treatment (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90, p = 0.001). Higher age decreased the risk of recurrent treatment (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99, p < 0.001). At 5 years, 36.0% (260/722) of the TT treated and 18.8% (164/872) of the surgically treated had undergone reoperation at some point. CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention rates and repeat hospital visits after TT and surgery were surprisingly high at long-term follow-up. Occurrences of retreatment and reoperation were significantly higher among primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients treated with TT at index hospitalization than among patients treated with surgery.

Thoracic cavity irrigation prevents retained hemothorax and decreases surgical intervention in trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Retained hemothorax (HTX) is a common complication following thoracic trauma. Small studies demonstrate the benefit of thoracic cavity irrigation at the time of tube thoracostomy (TT) for the prevention of retained HTX. We sought to assess the effectiveness of chest irrigation in preventing retained HTX leading to a secondary surgical intervention. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study from 2017 to 2021 at a Level I trauma center, comparing bedside thoracic cavity irrigation via TT versus no irrigation. Using the trauma registry, patients with traumatic HTX were identified. Exclusion criteria were TT placement at an outside hospital, no TT within 24 hours of admission, thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) prior to or within 6 hours after TT placement, VATS as part of rib fixation or diaphragmatic repair, and death within 96 hours of admission. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 225 (61%) were irrigated. Patients who were irrigated were more likely to suffer a penetrating injury (41% vs. 30%, p = 0.03) and less likely to have a flail chest (10% vs. 21%, p = 0.01). On bivariate analysis, irrigation was associated with lower rates of VATS (6% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) and retained HTX (10% vs. 21%, p < 0.001). The irrigated cohort had a shorter TT duration (4 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, thoracic cavity irrigation had lower odds of VATS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.54), retained HTX (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74), and a shorter TT duration ( ß = -1.58; 95% CI, -2.52 to -0.75). CONCLUSION: Our 5-year experience with thoracic irrigation confirms findings from smaller studies that irrigation prevents retained HTX and decreases the need for surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.