RESUMO
Background and Objectives: The health-related mobile applications (app) might assist in promoting inclusive health and tele-treatment, especially for the less severe diseases. In this paper, a study had been done to determine the app's reliability in terms of raters and the app's agreement with the Snellen chart. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional sectional study was conducted between November 2019 and September 2020. Participants were selected via purposive sampling from selected communities in Terengganu state. All participants underwent vision testing with the Vis-Screen app and Snellen chart for validity and reliability accordingly. Results: A total of 408 participants were involved, with a mean age of 29.3. The sensitivity of the presenting vision of the right eye (PVR) ranged from 55.6% to 88.4%, with specificity between 94.7% to 99.3%, while the positive and negative predictive values were between 57.9% and 81.7% and 96.8% and 99.0%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios ranged between 16.73 and 73.89, whereas the negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.12 to 0.45. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for all cut-off points ranged between 0.93 and 0.97, and the optimum cut-off point was at 6/12. The kappa values for intra-rater and inter-rater were 0.85 and 0.75, respectively, while the app's reliability with the Snellen chart was 0.61. Conclusions: Vis-Screen was concluded to be valid and reliable for use as a screening tool for detecting individuals with visual impairment and blindness in the community. A valid and reliable portable vision screener like Vis-Screen will help expand the eye care feasibility while providing similar accuracy as the conventional charts in clinical practices.
Assuntos
Smartphone , Seleção Visual , Humanos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cegueira/diagnósticoRESUMO
A liquid simulated eye was designed to detect different spherical diopter indexes in the type inspection of medical equipment vision screening instrument. This liquid test simulation eye design is composed of three parts: lens, cavity and retina-imitation piston. By using the principle of geometric optics and the optical scattering effect of human retina, the relationship between the accommodation displacement of the designed adjustable liquid simulated eye and the spherical mirror power was calculated and analyzed. The designed liquid test simulated eye can be applied to vision screening instruments, computer refractometers and other optometry equipments based on photography principle in spherical lens measurement and so on.
Assuntos
Cristalino , Seleção Visual , Humanos , Visão Ocular , Retina , FotografaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Myopia prevalence has increased in the UK at age 10-16y, but little is known about younger children. We hypothesise that if the 'myopia epidemic' is affecting young children, then there will be increasing rates of bilateral reduced unaided vision (V) at vision screenings of children 4-5 years of age. METHODS: Retrospective anonymised data from computerised vision screening at age 4-5 years were analysed from serial cross-sectional data. Refractive error is not assessed in UK vision screening, so vision was investigated. Data were only included from schools that screened every year from 2015/16 to 2021/22. The criterion used was unaided monocular logMAR (automated letter-by-letter scoring) vision >0.20 in both the right and left eyes, so as to maximise the chances of detecting bilateral, moderate myopia rather than amblyopia. RESULTS: Anonymised raw data were obtained for 359,634 screening episodes from 2075 schools. Once schools were excluded where data were not available for every year and data were cleaned, the final database comprised 110,076 episodes. The proportion (percentage and 95% CI) failing the criterion from 2015/16 to 2021/22 were 7.6 (7.2-8.0), 8.5 (8.1-8.9), 7.5 (7.1-7.9), 7.8 (7.4-8.2), 8.7 (8.1-9.2), 8.5 (7.9-9.0) and 9.3 (8.8-9.7), respectively. The slope of the regression line showed a trend for increasing rates of reduced bilateral unaided vision, consistent with increasing frequency of myopia (p = 0.06). A decreasing linear trendline was noted for children 'Under Professional Care'. CONCLUSIONS: For children 4-5 years of age, there were signs of reduced vision over the last 7 years in England. Consideration of the most likely causes support the hypothesis of increasing myopia. The increase in screening failures highlights the importance of eye care in this young population.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Miopia , Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Baixa Visão , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Miopia/diagnóstico , Miopia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Inglaterra/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background and aim: The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.5 billion and 2.2 billion people have hearing and vision impairment, respectively. The burden of these non-communicable diseases is highest in low- and middle-income countries due to a lack of services and health professionals. The WHO has recommended universal health coverage and integrated service delivery to improve ear and eye care services. This scoping review describes the evidence for combined hearing and vision screening programs. Method: A keyword search of three electronic databases, namely Scopus, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science, was conducted, resulting in 219 results. After removing duplicates and screening based on eligibility criteria, data were extracted from 19 included studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews were followed. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Most studies (63.2%) were from high-income countries, with 31.6% from middle-income and 5.2% from low-income countries. The majority of studies (78.9%) involved children and the four studies reporting on adults all included adults above 50 years of age. Vision screening was most commonly performed with the "Tumbling E" and "Snellen Chart," while hearing was typically screened using pure tone audiometry. Studies reported referral rates as the most common outcome with sensitivity and specificity rates not reported in any included articles. Reported benefits of combined vision and hearing screenings included earlier detection of vision and hearing difficulties to support functioning and quality of life as well as resource sharing for reduced costs. Challenges to combined screening included ineffective follow-up systems, management of test equipment, and monitoring of screening personnel. Conclusions: There is limited research evidence for combined hearing and vision screening programs. Although potential benefits are demonstrated, especially for mHealth-supported programs in communities, more feasibility and implementation research are required, particularly in low- and middle-income countries and across all age groups. Developing universal, standardized reporting guidelines for combined sensory screening programs is recommended to enhance the standardization and effectiveness of combined sensory screening programs.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva , Seleção Visual , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Pessoal de Saúde , Audição , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Vision impairment among children is associated with lower levels of educational attainment. School-based eye health programs have the potential to provide high-quality and cost-effective services that assist in the prevention of blindness and uncorrected vision impairment, particularly in low-resources settings. The aim of this study was to identify key factors that inhibit or facilitate the provision of school-based eye health programs, including referral to eye care services, for Malawian children in the Central Region. In-depth interviews (n = 10) and focus groups (n = 5) with children, parents, school staff, eye care practitioners, government and NGO workers (total participants n = 44) in rural and urban contexts within central region, Malawi, were conducted. Taking a rights-based approach, we used the AAAQ (availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality) framework to identify barriers and enablers to school eye health programs. Complex factors shape access to school-based eye health programs. While intersectoral collaboration between ministries was present, infrastructure and resourcing restricted the delivery of school eye health programs. School staff were supportive of being trained as vision screeners. Parents voiced geographic access to follow up eye care, and spectacle cost as a barrier; and children revealed experiences of stigma related to spectacle as barriers to uptake. School-based eye care may be facilitated through teachers, community informants and health workers through; the provision of school vision screening; increased awareness of the impact of vision impairment on education and future employment; and through educational approaches that seek to decrease stigma and misconceptions associated with wearing spectacles.
Assuntos
Seleção Visual , Criança , Humanos , Malaui , Instituições Acadêmicas , Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of vision screening among children with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the rate of photoscreening compared with visual acuity screening, and the effect of demographic factors on vision screening for children with ASD. METHODS: Data from well visits for 3- to 5-year-olds between January 2016 and December 2019 were collected via PEDSnet. Billing codes for vision screening were a proxy for the completion of vision screening. χ2 analysis examined the relationship of age, sex, race, ethnicity, region, and socioeconomic status to vision screening rate and rate of photoscreening versus visual acuity screening. Multivariate logistic regression assessed factors that impacted the odds of vision screening. RESULTS: We analyzed 63 829 well-child visits. Children with ASD were less likely to have a vision screening (36.5%) compared with children without ASD (59.9%). The lowest rates of screening occurred during the 3-year visit. Of those with ASD, Black children had a lower screening rate (27.6%) than white (39.7%) and other/multiracial children (39.8%). The use of photoscreening was higher in Hispanic children, increasing the overall rate of vision screening greater than non-Hispanic children. Practice region influenced the rates of vision screening for children with ASD because of more photoscreening. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ASD are less likely to receive vision screening at well visits compared with typically developing children. This disparity was greatest among younger children and Black children. One practice region used more photoscreening and had higher rates of screening. Photoscreening is a useful tool to decrease disparity, especially among high-risk patient groups.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Seleção Visual , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Negro ou Afro-Americano , BrancosRESUMO
Purpose: To study the prevalence and determinants of compliance with spectacle wear among school-age children in South India who were given spectacles free of charge under a school vision screening program. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed. The participants were recruited from the school from Tirunelveli and Tuticorin districts of Tamil Nadu, where a school vision screening camp was conducted between January 2012 and October 2012. The school screening was performed under. "Lavelle Pediatric Eye Care Project": . Of the 129,720 children examined of 249 schools, 4253 of children had refractive error and 3333 were prescribed and dispensed spectacles. A total of 683 children were interviewed, who were not wearing glasses on follow-up. Results: About 20% of the participants (683/3333) were not wearing their spectacles at examination. The most common reasons given for non-wear were lost (44.9%) or broken (35.3%) spectacles. There was no gender preference on compliance to spectacles. Conclusion: Compliance with spectacle wear is less even when spectacles are provided free of cost, particularly in children among the age group of 5-15 years. Because factors such as type of school, area (urban or rural), parent's income, occupation, and their education were not significantly affecting the compliance of spectacle wear, proper encouragement and counseling of the parents and the child become extremely important.
Assuntos
Óculos , Cooperação do Paciente , Erros de Refração , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Óculos/estatística & dados numéricos , Índia/epidemiologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Erros de Refração/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Seleção VisualRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective vision screening programs for children require follow-up with eye care providers, but studies demonstrate poor follow-up rates after failed screenings. Programs have attempted to address this issue by providing free examinations and glasses after failed screenings. This study presents data from a mobile clinic program that provides instrument-based vision screening, eye examinations, and free glasses directly to children at school. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2021, a nonprofit organization provided in-school instrument-based screening and noncycloplegic examinations and refractions in elementary, middle, and high schools. Deidentified screening and clinic data were reviewed retrospectively. Information about each school regarding total student enrollment, enrollment based on race, and number of economically disadvantaged students was obtained from the Virginia Department of Education. RESULTS: In the 2019-2020 school year, 14,006 students from 58 schools were screened, and 4,238 (30.3%) were referred. The percentage of economically disadvantaged students was positively correlated to referral rate (R2 = 0.406). Between 2019 and 2020, the mobile clinic examined 3,095 students from the same 58 schools. Of these, 72.9% were prescribed glasses, and 16.3% were referred for a more comprehensive eye examination and treatment. Students were also diagnosed with cataracts, nystagmus, amblyopia, and strabismus. CONCLUSIONS: A combined screening program and mobile clinic traveling directly to schools can provide a pipeline for delivering eye care to vulnerable populations.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Seleção Visual , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Unidades Móveis de Saúde , Visão Ocular , Ambliopia/diagnóstico , Ambliopia/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to understand the barriers and facilitators of vision screening in the US primary care setting for children aged 3 to 17 years. INTRODUCTION: Childhood vision screening is crucial because it detects children at risk of undiagnosed vision problems. Previous studies report low rates of appropriate vision screening in the primary care setting. We aim to identify barriers and facilitators of pediatric primary care vision screening to inform future interventions to improve childhood vision screening. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies of all types that identify barriers and facilitators of vision screening in children aged 3 to 17 years in the pediatric primary care setting in the US will be considered for inclusion. METHODS: We will search PubMed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus, Web of Science (SCI-EXPANDED, ESCI, CPCI-S, SSCI), Cochrane Library, and Embase. We will also search gray literature, including conference proceedings, professional organization reports, and clinical trials. We will use supplemental search strategies, including citation tracking and contacting authors for unpublished data. Titles and abstracts will be screened independently by 2 reviewers and selected for full-text screening based on prespecified inclusion criteria. Only studies in English will be considered. Each included study will be appraised using the mixed methods appraisal tool. Data will be extracted using a modified JBI mixed methods data extraction form. Qualitative and quantitative data will be integrated using a convergent integrated approach. DETAILS OF THE REVIEW AVAILABLE AT: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/nhf5d/.
Assuntos
Seleção Visual , Criança , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The blinq (Rebion Inc) is a new screening device designed to directly detect amblyopia and strabismus rather than amblyopia risk factors. We performed an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the blinq in detecting amblyopia and strabismus. DESIGN: Prospective clinical validity analysis of a screening device based on sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: Children presenting for examination in the pediatric ophthalmology clinic underwent screening with the blinq before examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist blinded to the screening results. Results of the blinq and examination findings of strabismus or amblyopia were compared. RESULTS: In our cohort of 267 children with an average age of 6.3 years, the sensitivity of the blinq to detect amblyopia or any constant strabismus was 87.5% (78.2%-93.8%) and specificity was 51.3% (43.9%-58.7%). Using the previously described "appropriate referral gold standard" criteria, including children with intermittent strabismus and high refractive error, the sensitivity increased to 91.3% and the specificity to 63.2%. We found a high number of children (44 [16%]) upon whom the blinq timed out and were included as automatic referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support use of the blinq as a screening device to detect amblyopia and strabismus in children.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Erros de Refração , Estrabismo , Seleção Visual , Criança , Humanos , Ambliopia/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estrabismo/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener according to updated 2021 AAPOS Vision Screening Committee guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screen validation. METHODS: As part of an IRB-approved ongoing prospective study, children were screened with the Spot prior to a complete examination. RESULTS: Spot screening was successful in 1,036 of 1,090 children (95%). Forty-eight percent of participants were referred for further screening using the Spot manufacturer guidelines, and 40% of all children were found to have a 2021 amblyopia risk factor or visually significant refractive error by gold standard examination. The Spot recommendation compared reasonably well to the 2021 criteria, with an overall sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.78. Applying updated guidelines to the Spot for hyperopia, anisometropia, and astigmatism yielded moderate-to-poor sensitivity (0.27-0.77) but excellent specificity (>0.9). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrates overall good prediction performance for the Spot for each diagnosis-myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, anisometropia (range, 0.87-0.97). Results of our study suggest increasing the instrument referral criterion for astigmatism from 1.5 D (manufacturer thresholds of the screener used in this study) to 2 D in older children. Decreasing the anisometropia cut-off from 1 D to 0.75 D would improve sensitivity from 0.59 to >0.8. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, the overall predictive ability of the Spot is good, with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.78. We recommend specific device refractive referral criteria to maximize screening effectiveness using the updated AAPOS guidelines.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Anisometropia , Astigmatismo , Hiperopia , Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Criança , Humanos , Astigmatismo/diagnóstico , Anisometropia/diagnóstico , Hiperopia/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ambliopia/diagnósticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the ocular health status of primary and secondary schoolchildren in Rwanda and to explore the use of the World Health Organization (WHO) primary eye care screening protocol. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study across 19 schools in Rwanda. Initial screening was carried out using the WHO screening protocol, whereby visual acuity was measured using a tumbling E Snellen chart (6/60 and 6/12). Abnormal ocular features were identified using a flashlight and history against a checklist. All children with abnormal screening were referred to an on-site ophthalmic clinic for full examination. Those who could not be treated on-site were referred to an ophthalmologist at a hospital for specialist care. RESULTS: A total of 24,892 children underwent ocular health screening. Of those, 1,865 (7.5%) failed the primary screening; 658 (2.6%) were false positives (35.3% of those who failed screening), and 1,207 (4.8%) true positives. The most frequently observed ocular diagnoses were allergic conjunctivitis (3.11%) and strabismus (0.26%). Refractive error was very rare (0.18%). CONCLUSIONS: The WHO primary eye care curriculum provides existing health personnel with an approach to school-based vision screening that uses a standardized checklist and low-cost resources. In our study cohort, results indicated a low frequency of refractive error; the overwhelming majority of ocular problems could be identified on visual inspection.
Assuntos
Conjuntivite Alérgica , Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Ruanda , Acuidade Visual , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Seleção Visual/métodosRESUMO
SIGNIFICANCE: The Lanthony D15 has been reported to have poorer repeatability than the Farnsworth D15. This study found that two trials of the test provide high short-term repeatability and can be administered this way for occupational testing. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the short-term repeatability of the Lanthony D15 in patients with color vision deficiency. Repeated trials were used to examine if learning effects occur and to determine how many trials would be necessary to ensure the highest short-term repeatability for occupational testing. METHODS: Twenty male subjects (mean [standard deviation] age, 27.2 [4.3] years) with congenital color vision deficiency, ranging from mild to severe, participated in this single-visit study. Visual acuity, color vision book screening, Farnsworth D15, and anomaloscope testing were performed for classification purposes. Ten trials of the Lanthony D15 were performed. Color confusion index scores from each trial were determined, and a repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the scores across trials. Orthogonal polynomial analysis was performed to detect any trends across trials through the third order. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: No differences in color confusion index (mean [standard error of the mean], 3.57 [0.04]) were found across the 10 trials ( P = .18). Legendre polynomials showed no statistical significance (all P > .39). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.90). Based on the method of Shrout and Fleiss, intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 could be achieved with an average of one, two, and four trials of the test, respectively. However, empirically, 0.9 was not achievable. CONCLUSIONS: The Lanthony D15 test has fairly high short-term repeatability. Thus, although more trials would likely improve clinical certainty, the mean result of two trials appears sufficient for occupational testing.
Assuntos
Defeitos da Visão Cromática , Visão de Cores , Seleção Visual , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Percepção de Cores , Testes de Percepção de Cores/métodos , Defeitos da Visão Cromática/diagnósticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report the outcomes and positive predictive value (PPV) of vision screening in schoolchildren 4-7 years of age through the Primary School Nurse Health Readiness Program (PSNHRP) in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective review of schoolchildren who underwent vision screening between January 2017 and December 2020 was conducted. Vision screening was performed through a dual-examination method, using the Parr 4m letter-matching vision test with crowding bars and the Spot photoscreener. Children were referred to an optometrist or ophthalmologist for review as required and if they failed either screening modality. PPVs were calculated based on whether a visual abnormality was confirmed by an ophthalmologist or optometrist. RESULTS: Of 185,685 eligible children, 176,164 (94.9%) consented to vision screening, 164,890 (93.6%) consented children underwent vision screening, and of those 12,148 (7.4%) were referred for an eye assessment. Of the 8,659 children with a known outcome (71.3% of referred), 6,011 (69.4% of known outcomes) had a confirmed visual abnormality and 2,648 (30.6%) children did not. The PPV was 0.73 when a referral was indicated by the photoscreener result, 0.76 when indicated by visual acuity testing, and 0.91 when indicated by both the photoscreener and visual acuity testing. CONCLUSIONS: The PSNHRP vision screening program showed a high uptake, and the dual screening method was effective in identifying visual abnormalities, with higher PPV when both visual acuity and photoscreener results indicated a need for referral.
Assuntos
Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Humanos , Criança , Seleção Visual/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Queensland , Estudos Retrospectivos , Austrália , Erros de Refração/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was - 0.13D for M, - 0.0002D (J0) and - 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was - 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/- 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/- 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel.
Assuntos
Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Aberrometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Refração Ocular , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Testes Visuais , Seleção Visual/métodosRESUMO
Early detection and treatment of refractive defects during school age are essential to avoid irreversible future vision loss and potential school problems. Previously, vision screening of preschool children used methods based on subjective visual acuity; however, technologies such as photorefraction have promoted the detection of refractive errors quickly and easily. In this study, 1347 children from 10 schools in Madrid aged 4 to 12 years participated in a program of early detection of visual problems, which consisted of visual screening composed of anamnesis and photorefraction with a PlusOptix A12R. The prevalence of refractive errors was analyzed in terms of spherical equivalent, cylinder and its orientation, and potential cases of development of high myopia or amblyopia. Hyperopia predominates in the early years, but the number of myopic subjects is higher than that of hyperopic subjects from the age of ten onwards. At all ages, the predominant orientation of astigmatism was with-the-rule. On average, 80% of the myopic subjects were uncorrected. Potential high myopia increased with age, from 4 to 21% of the measured population. Potential amblyopia cases decreased across age groups, from 19 to 13.7%. There is a need to raise awareness of the importance of vision screening at school age to address vision problems.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Astigmatismo , Hiperopia , Miopia , Erros de Refração , Seleção Visual , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Hiperopia/epidemiologia , Refração Ocular , Seleção Visual/métodos , Astigmatismo/epidemiologia , Miopia/diagnóstico , Miopia/epidemiologia , Ambliopia/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate universality of access, screening rate, and outcomes from the New South Wales (NSW) Statewide Eyesight Preschooler Screening (StEPS) over the period of 2009 to 2016. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. METHODS: The StEPS program provides vision screening to 4-year-old children residing in NSW and is administered within Local Health Districts (LHDs). Visual acuity (VA) was examined by trained lay and nurse screeners using HOTV logMAR. Children who had VA <6/9-2 were referred to local practitioners while those with VA <6/18 were referred to public hospital pediatric ophthalmic outpatient clinics where available. Activity data were collected by NSW Health and screening rates determined from population projections of 4-year-olds per LHD based on adjusted 2014 Census data. To determine factors impacting screening and referral rates, a random effects panel analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 719,686 (96.4%) NSW 4-year-old children were offered StEPS vision screening between 2009 and 2016, 84% accepted and 564,825 children (75.6%) were screened. The screening rate increased from 67.3% in 2009 to 74.5% in 2016, with an 80% target reached for 3 consecutive years from 2013 to 2015. Of those screened, 19.2% were referred to an eye health professional or advised to have a vision retest in 12 months. This referral rate remained steady over the period studied, with little variation between metropolitan, and rural and regional LHDs. CONCLUSIONS: StEPS is an ideal service model for preschool vision screening providing coverage that is comparable to school-based screening programs and at an age likely to facilitate optimal treatment outcomes.
Assuntos
Seleção Visual , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
Objetivo: estimar la prevalencia de la ambliopía y su tratamiento en niños de preescolar de la provincia de Alicante (España) durante un periodo de larga duración, así como la influencia de diferentes factores sociodemográficos. Material y método: estudio observacional descriptivo transversal (2002-2015) mediante protocolo de detección de ambliopía validado (sensibilidad 89,3%; especificidad 93,1%) en niños escolarizados de 4 a 6 años. La variable principal fue la clasificación, de los 140 102 niños examinados, según el resultado de las pruebas (normales, sospechosos de patología o en tratamiento previo) y las variables explicativas: edad, sexo, curso escolar, tipo de gestión del colegio y su ubicación. Resultados: la prevalencia de niños con sospecha de ambliopía osciló significativamente, entre los cursos escolares, desde 8,54% hasta 23,9% (p = 0,00000). Los niños de 6 años presentaron valores de sospecha de ambliopía notablemente más altos (16,68%; p = 0,00000) y los niños matriculados en colegios privados, los más bajos (8,05%; p = 0,00000). La probabilidad de que un niño no-normal estuviera ya tratado aumentaba con la edad (OR 2,06; p <0,001) y con el hecho de asistir a un colegio privado (OR 1,56; p = 0,001). Conclusiones: la prevalencia de la sospecha de ambliopía fue alta en el área de estudio, siendo los niños de mayor edad y los niños pertenecientes al grupo de nivel socioeconómico más bajo los de mayor riesgo. Los programas de cribado escolar para la detección temprana de la ambliopía son recomendados para aumentar y equiparar la probabilidad de acceso al tratamiento, reduciendo así la prevalencia y la gravedad de la ambliopía en niños (AU)
Objective: to estimate the prevalence of amblyopia and its treatment in preschool children in the province of Alicante over a long time period, and assess the influence of different sociodemographic factors.Methods: cross-sectional descriptive observational study (2002-2015) using a validated amblyopia detection protocol (sensitivity, 89.3%; specificity, 93.1%) in preschool children aged 4 to 6 years. The primary outcome was the classification of the 140 102 examined children based on the test results ('normal', 'suspected amblyopia' or 'in treatment') and the explanatory variables: age, sex, school year, private/public ownership of school and school location.Results: the prevalence of children with suspected amblyopia varied significantly between school years, ranging from 8.54% to 23.9% (p=0.00000). The prevalence of suspected amblyopia was significantly higher in children aged 6 years (16.68%; p=0.00000) and lowest in those attending private schools (8.05%; p=0.00000). The probability that a child with abnormal results was already in treatment increased with age (OR 2.06; p<0.001) and with enrolment in a private school (OR 1.56; p=0.001).Conclusions: the prevalence of suspected amblyopia was high in the study area, with a higher risk in older children and children in to the lowest socioeconomic status group. School-based screening programs for early detection of amblyopia are recommended to increase and equalize access to treatment, thereby reducing the prevalence and severity of amblyopia in children. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Ambliopia/epidemiologia , Seleção Visual , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estudos Transversais , Espanha/epidemiologia , Ambliopia/terapia , Ambliopia/diagnóstico , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Introducción: la ambliopía es la causa más común de pérdida de visión prevenible en los países desarrollados. Dicha prevención depende de una detección y tratamiento precoces mediante un adecuado cribado visual en la infancia. Nuestro objetivo es describir la situación del cribado visual en Atención Primaria en España y su relación con la formación de los profesionales. Material y métodos: estudio observacional descriptivo mediante encuesta telemática a los pediatras de Atención Primaria acerca de sus conocimientos sobre el desarrollo visual y las técnicas de cribado, material y formación al respecto. Análisis estadístico descriptivo y univariado en busca de relación entre la formación recibida y sus conocimientos. Resultados: el 79,3% de los participantes acierta más de la mitad de las preguntas teóricas. El 82,8% tiene optotipos estandarizados y el 30,7%, el test de Lang. El 72,7% conoce la distancia óptima y el 76,6% la altura óptima para explorar la agudeza visual con optotipos. El 50%, 68,3% y 44,5% realiza el reflejo rojo, el test de Hirschberg y el Cover test en las revisiones indicadas, respectivamente. Más del 90% conoce los criterios de derivación al oftalmólogo. El 3,1% ha recibido formación institucional y el 54,8% autónoma. Existen diferencias en la puntuación obtenida entre los profesionales según la formación recibida. Conclusiones: se detectan aspectos a mejorar. Se debe explorar el reflejo rojo en todas las revisiones del lactante y la alineación ocular desde los 6 meses, así como disponer y mejorar la utilización del test de Lang y de optotipos estandarizados. Existe relación entre un mayor nivel de conocimientos teóricos y prácticos y la formación recibida (AU)
Introduction: amblyopia is the most frequent cause of preventable vision loss in developed countries. Its prevention depends on early detection and treatment through adequate vision screening in childhood. Our objective was to describe the current situation in vision screening at the primary care level in Spain and its association with the training of professionals.Material and methods: observational descriptive study via a remote survey of primary care paediatricians of their knowledge on visual development and vision screening techniques, equipment and training. We conducted a statistical descriptive and univariate analysis to assess the association between the training received and the level of knowledge. Results: of all respondents, 79.3% answered the theoretical questions correction, 82.8% had standardised optotypes and 30.7% used the Lang test. Also, 72.7% knew the adequate distance and 76.6% the optimal height to assess visual acuity with optotypes. Fifty percent used the red reflex test, 68.3% the Hirschberg test and 44.5% the cover test in the appropriate check-ups. As regards training, 3.1% received it from their institutions, and 54.8% independently. Over 90% knew the criteria for referral to the ophthalmologist. We found differences in the scores of the respondents based on the training received.Conclusion: we identified opportunities for improvement: the red reflex test should be performed during all infant check-ups and ocular alignment checked from 6 months, and the Lang test and standardised optotypes should be available and their use improved. Higher levels of theoretical and practical knowledge are positively correlated with the amount of training received by health professionals. (AU)