Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 736
Filtrar
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1377866, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560433

RESUMEN

Background: The persistence of symptoms or the development of new symptoms following a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 has given rise to a multifaceted clinical condition referred to as "long COVID" (LC). The understanding of LC among China's non-hospitalized population continues to be insufficient. This investigation was designed to evaluate the protracted consequences amongst this demographic, as well as to identify the associated risk factors. Methods: This research constitutes a prospective cohort study focusing on non-hospitalized individuals, aged between 18 and 59, who have been positively diagnosed with COVID-19. Each participant was subjected to a sequence of questionnaire-based surveys, designed to evaluate symptoms as well as the status of depression and anxiety. A logistic regression model, adjusted for multiple variables, was employed to scrutinize the correlation between demographic elements, lifestyle attributes, and health-related risk factors in relation to conditions and symptoms post COVID-19 infection. Results: A total of 706 individuals participated in the 3 months follow-up, with 620 continuing on to the 6 months follow-up. The median age was 35 (28, 43) years, and 597 (85%) are female. Upon follow-up, Compared with patients without LC, patients with LC have a higher proportion of females (420 (87%) vs. 177 (79%); p = 0.010), were older (35 (29, 44) years vs. 33 (27, 41) years; p = 0.010) and have more comorbidities. Out of all participants, 483 (68.4%) reported experiencing at least one symptom at the 3 months mark, while 49.7% reported symptoms persisting at the 6 months mark. At the 3 months follow-up, the most prevalent persistent symptoms were cough (46%), fatigue (38%), and shortness of breath (34%). By the 6 months follow-up, fatigue (25%), shortness of breath (22%), and sleep disorders (16%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Anxiety and depression were consistently reported as prevalent symptoms throughout the follow-up period. Most patient symptoms fade over time, with the quickest decreases observed in cough (from 46 to 9%), expectoration (from 26 to 6.3%), smell disorder (from 16 to 3.9%), and taste disorder (from 18 to 3.5%). Male and those possessing advanced educational qualifications exhibit a decreased susceptibility to the sustained incidence of coughing. Conversely, older age and the presence of comorbidities were identified as risk factors for persistent fatigue and shortness of breath. Conclusion: In the after of COVID-19, it has been observed that the majority of patient symptoms tend to decrease over time. The primary residual symptoms noticed after a 6 month follow-up were fatigue, dyspnea, and sleep disturbances. However, it's noteworthy that the risk factors associated with these symptoms exhibit subtle variations. Furthermore, psychological sequelae, namely depression and anxiety, are frequently reported among COVID-19 survivors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Prospectivos , Tos , Disnea , Fatiga
2.
J Int Adv Otol ; 20(1): 19-25, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Objectives: (1) To determine whether the incidence of Bell's Palsy (BP) increased during the pandemic. (2) To investigate whether the outcomes of patients with BP and COVID-19 infection or vaccination differ from those in the pre-pandemic era. METHODS: Patients with BP were studied in 2 periods retrospectively (March 2021-March 2022 and August 2018-August 2019). A prospective study from March 2021 to March 2022 was also performed. Primary outcome was grade ≤Ⅱ in the House-Brackmann (HB) and/or >70 in the Sunnybrook facial grading system (SFGS) scales at the 12-week visit. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based SARS-CoV-2 immuonoglobulin G (IgG) test (blood) were measured. RESULTS: About 162 and 196 patients with BP were identified between March 2021 and March 2022 and August 2018 and August 2019, respectively. Forty-seven patients (29%) entered the prospective study; 85% had HB grades I or II, while 92% had an SFGS score of 71-100 at the last visit. Only 3 patients (6.5%) had a positive PCR during the initial episode, whereas 35 patients (77%) had positive IgG SARS-CoV-2. There was no association between positive PCR and facial function outcomes. Of the 162 patients, 105 (67%) had received COVID-19 vaccine. In 23 of them (22%), the paralysis appeared within the first 30 days after a vaccine dose. CONCLUSION: Coronavirus disease 2019 did not increase the incidence of BP. A direct association between the coronavirus and BP outcome cannot be established. The considerable number of patients developing BP within the first month suggests a possible association between COVID-19 vaccines and BP.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis de Bell , COVID-19 , Parálisis Facial , Humanos , Parálisis de Bell/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Incidencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Inmunoglobulina G
3.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(3): e1219, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501534

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Down syndrome (DS) is associated with multiple comorbid conditions and chronic immune dysfunction. Persons with DS who contract COVID-19 are at high risk for complications and have a poor prognosis. We aimed to study the clinical symptoms, laboratory and biochemical profiles, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes of patients with DS and COVID-19. METHOD: We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library using the keywords COVID-19 or coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2 and DS or trisomy 21. Seventeen articles were identified: eight case reports and nine case series published from December 2019 through March 2022, with a total of 55 cases. RESULTS: Patients averaged 24.8 years (26 days to 60 years); 29 of the patients were male. The most common symptoms were fever, dyspnea, and cough. Gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tract symptoms were commonly reported for pediatric patients. The most common comorbidities present in patients with DS were obesity (49.0%), hypothyroidism (21.6%) and obstructive sleep apnea (15.6%). The patients were hospitalized for a mean of 14.8 days. When the patients were compared with the general COVID-19 population, the mean number of hospitalized days was higher. Most patients had leukopenia, lymphopenia, and elevated inflammatory markers (d-dimer and C-reactive protein). Bilateral infiltrations and bilateral ground-glass opacifications were frequently seen in chest radiographs and chest computed tomographic imaging. Most of the patients were treated with methylprednisolone, macrolides, and hydroxychloroquine. Of the 55 patients, 22 died. The mean age of the patients who died was 42.8 years. Mortality rate was higher in individuals with DS over 40 years of age. CONCLUSION: More studies are needed to better understand COVID-19 infections among persons with DS. In addition, the study was limited by a lack of statistical analyses and a specific comparison group.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Down , Linfopenia , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tos/epidemiología , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
4.
Euro Surveill ; 29(13)2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551095

RESUMEN

BackgroundScarce European data in early 2021 suggested lower vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages than previous variants.AimWe aimed to estimate primary series (PS) and first booster VE against symptomatic BA.1/BA.2 infection and investigate potential biases.MethodsThis European test-negative multicentre study tested primary care patients with acute respiratory symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 in the BA.1/BA.2-dominant period. We estimated PS and booster VE among adults and adolescents (PS only) for all products combined and for Comirnaty alone, by time since vaccination, age and chronic condition. We investigated potential bias due to correlation between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination and explored effect modification and confounding by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.ResultsAmong adults, PS VE was 37% (95% CI: 24-47%) overall and 60% (95% CI: 44-72%), 43% (95% CI: 26-55%) and 29% (95% CI: 13-43%) < 90, 90-179 and ≥ 180 days post vaccination, respectively. Booster VE was 42% (95% CI: 32-51%) overall and 56% (95% CI: 47-64%), 22% (95% CI: 2-38%) and 3% (95% CI: -78% to 48%), respectively. Primary series VE was similar among adolescents. Restricting analyses to Comirnaty had little impact. Vaccine effectiveness was higher among older adults. There was no signal of bias due to correlation between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination. Confounding by previous infection was low, but sample size precluded definite assessment of effect modification.ConclusionPrimary series and booster VE against symptomatic infection with BA.1/BA.2 ranged from 37% to 42%, with similar waning post vaccination. Comprehensive data on previous SARS-CoV-2 infection would help disentangle vaccine- and infection-induced immunity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Adolescente , Anciano , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacuna BNT162 , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud
5.
Med J Aust ; 220(6): 323-330, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508863

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of long COVID among Western Australian adults, a highly vaccinated population whose first major exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was during the 2022 Omicron wave, and to assess its impact on health service use and return to work or study. STUDY DESIGN: Follow-up survey (completed online or by telephone). SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Adult Western Australians surveyed 90 days after positive SARS-CoV-2 test results (polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen testing) during 16 July - 3 August 2022 who had consented to follow-up contact for research purposes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of respondents with long COVID (ie, reporting new or ongoing symptoms or health problems, 90 days after positive SARS-CoV-2 test result); proportion with long COVID who sought health care for long COVID-related symptoms two to three months after infection; proportion who reported not fully returning to previous work or study because of long COVID-related symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 70 876 adults with reported SARS-CoV-2 infections, 24 024 consented to contact (33.9%); after exclusions, 22 744 people were invited to complete the survey, of whom 11 697 (51.4%) provided complete responses. Our case definition for long COVID was satisfied by 2130 respondents (18.2%). The risk of long COVID was greater for women (v men: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.6) and for people aged 50-69 years (v 18-29 years: aRR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9) or with pre-existing health conditions (aRR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7), as well as for people who had received two or fewer COVID-19 vaccine doses (v four or more: aRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8) or three doses (aRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). The symptoms most frequently reported by people with long COVID were fatigue (1504, 70.6%) and concentration difficulties (1267, 59.5%). In the month preceding the survey, 814 people had consulted general practitioners (38.2%) and 34 reported being hospitalised (1.6%) with long COVID. Of 1779 respondents with long COVID who had worked or studied before the infection, 318 reported reducing or discontinuing this activity (17.8%). CONCLUSION: Ninety days after infection with the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant, 18.2% of survey respondents reported symptoms consistent with long COVID, of whom 38.7% (7.1% of all survey respondents) sought health care for related health concerns two to three months after the acute infection.


Asunto(s)
Pueblos de Australasia , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología
6.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2003, 2024 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443359

RESUMEN

Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol remains contentious. Importantly, whether cough or breath-generated bioaerosols can harbor viable and replicating virus remains largely unclarified. We performed size-fractionated aerosol sampling (Andersen cascade impactor) and evaluated viral culturability in human cell lines (infectiousness), viral genetics, and host immunity in ambulatory participants with COVID-19. Sixty-one percent (27/44) and 50% (22/44) of participants emitted variant-specific culture-positive aerosols <10µm and <5µm, respectively, for up to 9 days after symptom onset. Aerosol culturability is significantly associated with lower neutralizing antibody titers, and suppression of transcriptomic pathways related to innate immunity and the humoral response. A nasopharyngeal Ct <17 rules-in ~40% of aerosol culture-positives and identifies those who are probably highly infectious. A parsimonious three transcript blood-based biosignature is highly predictive of infectious aerosol generation (PPV > 95%). There is considerable heterogeneity in potential infectiousness i.e., only 29% of participants were probably highly infectious (produced culture-positive aerosols <5µm at ~6 days after symptom onset). These data, which comprehensively confirm variant-specific culturable SARS-CoV-2 in aerosol, inform the targeting of transmission-related interventions and public health containment strategies emphasizing improved ventilation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Cinética , Aerosoles y Gotitas Respiratorias
7.
J Psychosom Res ; 178: 111602, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38359637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the temporal trend of anxiety and depression prevalences up to 2 years of follow-up for COVID-19 patients during the recovery period and to compare regional differences. METHODS: We performed a systematic review from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP using keywords such as "COVID-19", "anxiety", "depression", and "cohort study". Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression at five follow-up time intervals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by different regions. RESULTS: 34 cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled anxiety prevalence rates at 0-1 month, 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and 12-24 months were 18% (95% CI: 11% to 28%), 18% (95% CI: 12% to 28%), 22% (95% CI: 16% to 29%), 15% (95% CI: 11% to 21%), and 10% (95% CI: 0.05% to 20%), respectively, and the pooled depression prevalence rates were 22% (95%CI: 15% to 33%), 19% (95% CI: 13% to 29%), 21% (95% CI: 15% to 28%), 15% (95% CI: 11% to 20%), and 9% (95% CI: 0.4% to 21%) respectively. The prevalence of depression in Asian and non-Asian countries was statistically different at 0-1 month (χ2 = 15.248, P < 0.001) and 1-3 months (χ2 = 28.298, P < 0.001), and prevalence of anxiety was statistically different at 3-6 months (χ2 = 9.986, P = 0.002) and 6-12 months (χ2 = 7.378, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients generally tends to decrease after 2 years of recovery, but may temporarily increase at 3-6 months. There are regional differences in the changes in prevalence of anxiety and depression.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Depresión , Humanos , Depresión/epidemiología , Prevalencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología
8.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 37(4): 360-362, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410000

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine changes in case rates of youth onset type 2 diabetes in the three years following the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective medical record review was conducted for patients newly diagnosed with T2D between 3/1/18 and 2/28/23 at a pediatric tertiary care center. The number of patients referred to CHLA with a T2D diagnosis date between 3/1/2020 and 2/28/2023 was compared to historical rates between 3/1/2018 and 2/29/2020. χ2 or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between each year and 2019. RESULTS: Compared to prepandemic baseline (3/1/19-2/29/20, 11.8±3.7 cases/month), there was a significant increase in new T2D monthly case rates in pandemic year 1 (3/1/20-2/28/21, 20.1±6.0 cases/month, 171 %, p=0.005) and pandemic year 2 (3/1/21-2/28/22, 25.9±8.9 cases/month, 221 %, p=0.002). Case rates declined in pandemic year 3 to 14.5±4.1 cases/month (3/1/22-2/28/23, p=0.43). Compared to prepandemic year 1, the frequency of DKA at diagnosis was higher in pandemic year 1 (13.3 vs. 5.0 %, p=0.009). The DKA rate in pandemic years 2 (6.8 %) and 3 (3.4 %) were comparable to prepandemic year 1 (p=0.53 and 0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Youth onset type 2 diabetes cases and DKA rates in year 3 of the pandemic have returned to prepandemic level.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cetoacidosis Diabética , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4479, 2024 02 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396092

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic, triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected millions of people worldwide. Much research has been dedicated to our understanding of COVID-19 disease heterogeneity and severity, but less is known about recovery associated changes. To address this gap in knowledge, we quantified the proteome from serum samples from 29 COVID-19 convalescents and 29 age-, race-, and sex-matched healthy controls. Samples were acquired within the first months of the pandemic. Many proteins from pathways known to change during acute COVID-19 illness, such as from the complement cascade, coagulation system, inflammation and adaptive immune system, had returned to levels seen in healthy controls. In comparison, we identified 22 and 15 proteins with significantly elevated and lowered levels, respectively, amongst COVID-19 convalescents compared to healthy controls. Some of the changes were similar to those observed for the acute phase of the disease, i.e. elevated levels of proteins from hemolysis, the adaptive immune systems, and inflammation. In contrast, some alterations opposed those in the acute phase, e.g. elevated levels of CETP and APOA1 which function in lipid/cholesterol metabolism, and decreased levels of proteins from the complement cascade (e.g. C1R, C1S, and VWF), the coagulation system (e.g. THBS1 and VWF), and the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (e.g. PFN1 and CFL1) amongst COVID-19 convalescents. We speculate that some of these shifts might originate from a transient decrease in platelet counts upon recovery from the disease. Finally, we observed race-specific changes, e.g. with respect to immunoglobulins and proteins related to cholesterol metabolism.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Factor de von Willebrand , Proteínas Sanguíneas , Inflamación , Colesterol , Profilinas
10.
Gesundheitswesen ; 86(3): 237-246, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316408

RESUMEN

In the school years 2019/20 and 2020/21, children were physically, psychologically, and socially stressed by school closures caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To ensure attendance with optimal infection protection, PCR pool testing was conducted during the 2021/22 school year at Bavarian elementary schools and schools for pupils with special needs for timely detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study analyzes the results of PCR pool testing over time stratified by region, school type, and age of children. The data were obtained from classes in elementary and special needs schools, involving pupils aged 6 to 11 years, who participated in the Bavaria-wide PCR pool testing from 09/20/21 to 04/08/22. Samples were collected twice weekly, consisting of PCR pool samples and individual PCR samples, which were only evaluated in case of a positive pool test. A class was considered positive if at least one individual sample from that class was positive within a calendar week (CW). A school (class) was considered to be infection-prone if three or more classes in that school (students in that class) were positive within a CW. The data included 2,430 elementary schools (339 special needs schools) with 23,021 (2,711) classes and 456,478 (29,200) children. A total of 1,157,617 pools (of which 3.37% were positive) and 724,438 individual samples (6.76% positive) were analyzed. Larger schools exhibited higher PR compared to smaller schools. From January 2022, the Omicron variant led to a massive increase in PR across Bavaria. The incidence rates per 100,000 person-weeks within the individual school samples were significantly lower than the concurrently reported age-specific and general infection incidences in the overall Bavarian population. PCR pool testing revealed relatively few positive pools, with an average of four children per one hundred pools testing positive. Schools and classes were rarely considered infection-prone, even during periods of high incidences outside of schools. The combination of PCR pool testing and hygiene measures allowed for a largely safe in-person education for pupils in primary and special needs schools in the school year 2021/22.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Niño , Humanos , Vigilancia de Guardia , Pandemias , Alemania , Instituciones Académicas , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prueba de COVID-19
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e079106, 2024 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346886

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and drivers of distress, a composite of burnout, decreased meaning in work, severe fatigue, poor work-life integration and quality of life, and suicidal ideation, among nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design to evaluate distress levels of nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic between June and August 2021. SETTING: Cardiovascular and oncology care settings at a Canadian quaternary hospital network. PARTICIPANTS: 261 nurses and 167 physicians working in cardiovascular or oncology care. Response rate was 29% (428 of 1480). OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey tool to measure clinician distress using the Well-Being Index (WBI) and additional questions about workplace-related and COVID-19 pandemic-related factors. RESULTS: Among 428 respondents, nurses (82%, 214 of 261) and physicians (62%, 104 of 167) reported high distress on the WBI survey. Higher WBI scores (≥2) in nurses were associated with perceived inadequate staffing (174 (86%) vs 28 (64%), p=0.003), unfair treatment, (105 (52%) vs 11 (25%), p=0.005), and pandemic-related impact at work (162 (80%) vs 22 (50%), p<0.001) and in their personal life (135 (67%) vs 11 (25%), p<0.001), interfering with job performance. Higher WBI scores (≥3) in physicians were associated with perceived inadequate staffing (81 (79%) vs 32 (52%), p=0.001), unfair treatment (44 (43%) vs 13 (21%), p=0.02), professional dissatisfaction (29 (28%) vs 5 (8%), p=0.008), and pandemic-related impact at work (84 (82%) vs 35 (56%), p=0.001) and in their personal life (56 (54%) vs 24 (39%), p=0.014), interfering with job performance. CONCLUSION: High distress was common among nurses and physicians working in cardiovascular and oncology care settings during the pandemic and linked to factors within and beyond the workplace. These results underscore the complex and contextual aspects of clinician distress, and the need to develop targeted approaches to effectively address this problem.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Médicos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Calidad de Vida , Canadá/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Hospitales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción en el Trabajo
12.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 82: 103623, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215559

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence and distribution of pressure injuries (PIs) with two approaches to prone positioning for mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, and to determine the prevalence of these PIs on intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Adult patients admitted to a quaternary ICU with COVID-19-associated acute lung injury, between September 2021 and February 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and anatomical distribution of PIs during ICU stay for "Face Down" and "Swimmers Position" as well as on ICU and hospital discharge. RESULTS: We investigated 206 prone episodes in 63 patients. In the Face Down group, 26 of 34 patients (76 %) developed at least one PI, compared to 10 of 22 patients (45 %) in the Swimmers Position group (p = 0.02). Compared to the Swimmers Position group, the Face Down group developed more pressure injuries per patient (median 1 [1, 3] vs 0 [0, 2], p = 0.04) and had more facial PIs (p = 0.002). In a multivariate logistic regression model, patients were more likely to have at least one PI with Face Down position (OR 4.67, 95 % CI 1.28, 17.04, p = 0.02) and greater number of prone episodes (OR 1.75, 95 % CI 1.12, 2.74, p = 0.01). Over 80 % of all PIs were either stage 1 or stage 2. By ICU discharge, 29 % had healed and by hospital discharge, 73 % of all PIs had healed. CONCLUSION: Swimmers Position had a significantly lower incidence of PIs compared to the Face Down approach. One-quarter of PIs had healed by time of ICU discharge and three-quarters by time of hospital discharge. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: There are differences in incidence of PIs related to prone positioning approaches. This study validates and helps better inform current prone position guidelines recommending the use of Swimmers Position. The low prevalence of PIs at hospital discharge is reassuring.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Úlcera por Presión , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Posición Prona , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
13.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 46(2): e164-e168, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277622

RESUMEN

Supporting schooling for current and past pediatric oncology patients is vital to their quality of life and psychosocial recovery. However, no study has examined the perspectives toward in-person schooling among pediatric oncology families during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this online survey study, we determined the rate of and attitudes toward in-person school attendance among current and past pediatric oncology patients living in Ontario, Canada during the 2020-2021 school year. Of our 31-family cohort, 23 children (74%) did attend and 8 (26%) did not attend any in-person school during this time. Fewer children within 2 years of treatment completion attended in-person school (5/8; 62%) than those more than 2 years from treatment completion (13/15; 87%). Notably, 22 of 29 parents (76%) felt that speaking to their care team had the greatest impact compared to other potential information sources when deciding about school participation, yet 13 (45%) were unaware of their physician's specific recommendation regarding whether their child should attend. This study highlights the range in parental comfort regarding permitting in-person schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatric oncologists should continue to address parental concerns around in-person school during times of high transmission of COVID-19 and potentially other communicable diseases in the future.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Niño , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Pandemias , Calidad de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia
14.
Respir Care ; 69(3): 281-289, 2024 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the first months of the pandemic, prior to the introduction of proven-effective treatments, 15-37% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were discharged on home oxygen. After proven-effective treatments for acute COVID-19 were established by evidence-based guidelines, little remains known about home oxygen requirements following hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of subjects hospitalized for COVID-19 between October 2020-September 2021 at 3 academic health centers. Information was abstracted from electronic health records at the index hospitalization and for 60 d after discharge. The World Health Organization COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale score was used to identify patients with severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 517 subjects (mean age 58 y, 47% female, 42% Black, 36% Hispanic, 22% with severe COVID-19), 81% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 61% with remdesivir, and 2.5% with tocilizumab. About one quarter of subjects were discharged on home oxygen (26% [95% CI 22-29]). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02 per 5 y [95% CI 1.02-1.02]), higher body mass index (aOR 1.02 per kg/m2 [1.00-1.04]), diabetes (yes vs no, aOR 1.73 [1.46-2.02]), severe COVID-19 (vs moderate, aOR 3.19 [2.19-4.64]), and treatment with systemic corticosteroids (yes vs no, aOR 30.63 [4.51-208.17]) were associated with an increased odds of discharge on home oxygen. Comorbid hypertension (yes vs no, aOR 0.71 [0.66-0.77) was associated with a decreased odds of home oxygen. Within 60 d of hospital discharge, 50% had documentation of pulse oximetry; in this group, home oxygen was discontinued in 46%. CONCLUSIONS: About one in 41 subjects were prescribed home oxygen after hospitalization for COVID-19, even after guidelines established proven-effective treatments for acute illness. Evidence-based strategies to reduce the requirement for home oxygen in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 are needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización , Oxígeno , Corticoesteroides
15.
Int J Cancer ; 154(10): 1731-1744, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38268160

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on cancer patients and services but has been difficult to quantify. We examined how the entire cancer pathway-from incidence, presentation, diagnosis, stage, treatment and survival-was affected in Northern Ireland during April-December 2020 compared to equivalent 2018-2019 periods using retrospective, observational cancer registry data from the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (NICR). There were 6748 cancer cases in April-December 2020 and an average 7724 patients in April-December 2018-2019. Incident cases decreased by 13% (almost 1000). Significant differences were found across age cohorts and deprivation quintiles, with reductions greatest for younger people (<55 years; 19% decrease) and less deprived (22% decrease). A higher proportion had emergency admission (16%-to-20%) with lower proportions diagnosed pathologically (85%-to-83%). There was a significant stage shift, with lower proportions of early stage (29%-to-25%) and higher late-stage (21%-to-23%). Lower proportions received surgery (41%-to-38%) and radiotherapy (24%-to-22%) with a higher proportion not receiving treatment (29%-to-33%). One-year observed-survival decreased from 73.7% to 69.8% and 1-year net-survival decreased from 76.1% to 72.9%, with differences driven by five tumours; Lung (40.3%-to-35.0%), Head-and-Neck (77.4%-to-68.4%), Oesophageal (53.5%-to-42.3%), Lymphoma (81.1%-to-75.2%) and Uterine cancer (87.4%-to-80.4%). Our study reveals profound adverse impact of COVID-19 on the entire cancer patient pathway, with 13% fewer cases, greater emergency admissions and significant stage-shift from early to more advanced-stage disease. There was major treatment impact with lower rates of surgery and radiotherapy and higher proportions receiving no treatment. There were significant reductions in 1-year survival. Our study will support service recovery and protect cancer services in future pandemics or disruptions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Irlanda del Norte , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19
16.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 6(2): e92-e104, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the first-line treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and reduces vaccine-induced immunity. We evaluated if a 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination improved antibody response against the S1 receptor binding domain (S1-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and live SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation compared with uninterrupted treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. METHOD: We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, superiority trial in secondary-care rheumatology and dermatology clinics in 26 hospitals in the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases taking methotrexate (≤25 mg per week) for at least 3 months, who had received two primary vaccine doses from the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised validated computer program, to temporarily suspend methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks immediately after COVID-19 booster vaccination or continue treatment as usual. The primary outcome was S1-RBD antibody titres 4 weeks after COVID-19 booster vaccination and was assessed masked to group assignment. All randomly assigned patients were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN11442263; following a pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was stopped early. FINDING: Between Sept 30, 2021, and March 7, 2022, we screened 685 individuals, of whom 383 were randomly assigned: to either suspend methotrexate (n=191; mean age 58·8 years [SD 12·5], 118 [62%] women and 73 [38%] men) or to continue methotrexate (n=192; mean age 59·3 years [11·9], 117 [61%] women and 75 [39%] men). At 4 weeks, the geometric mean S1-RBD antibody titre was 25 413 U/mL (95% CI 22 227-29 056) in the suspend methotrexate group and 12 326 U/mL (10 538-14 418) in the continue methotrexate group with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 2·08 (95% CI 1·59-2·70; p<0·0001). No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases enhanced antibody responses after COVID-19 booster vaccination that were sustained at 12 weeks and 26 weeks. There was a temporary increase in inflammatory disease flares, mostly self-managed. The choice to suspend methotrexate should be individualised based on disease status and vulnerability to severe outcomes from COVID-19. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 13, 2024 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244147

RESUMEN

Several concerns have been raised about a causal relationship between COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines and the development of herpes zoster (HZ). We performed a prospective analysis of the Vax-On-Third-Profile study to investigate the incidence of HZ after the third dose of mRNA-BNT162b2 (tozinameran) and its correlation with immune responses. Patients who had received a booster dose and had been actively treated for at least 8 weeks were eligible. Serologic assessment was performed before the third dose of tozinameran (timepoint-1) and 4 weeks later (timepoint-2). We also assessed the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections at predefined time points. The current analysis included 310 patients, of whom 109 (35.2%) and 111 (35.8%) were being treated with targeted therapies and cytotoxic chemotherapy, respectively. All participants received a third dose of tozinameran between September 26 and October 30, 2021. After a mean follow-up of 17.3 (IQR 15.1-18.4) months, HZ occurred in 8 recipients, for a cumulative incidence of 2.6%, and an incidence rate of 0.310 per person-year (95% CI 0.267-0.333). All HZ cases occurred within 30 days of booster dosing (range 5-29 days), with a median time to onset of 15 (IQR 9-22) days. Among the 7 patients (2.2%) who also contracted a SARS-CoV-2 infection, all cases preceded COVID-19 outbreaks. No instances of complicated HZ were reported. In multivariate analysis, impaired T helper and T cytotoxic cell counts independently correlated with HZ occurrence. These findings provide the first evidence that cancer patients on active treatment have a not negligible risk of developing HZ within 30 days after the third dose of tozinameran. The favorable clinical outcome of all observed cases confirms that protective effects of boosters in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 outweigh the potential risk of HZ occurrence.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Herpes Zóster , Neoplasias , Humanos , Vacuna BNT162 , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , ARN Mensajero
18.
Lancet HIV ; 11(2): e96-e105, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the HIV prevalence among South African adults was 18% and more than 2 million people had uncontrolled HIV and, therefore, had increased risk of poor outcomes with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated trends in COVID-19 admissions and factors associated with in-hospital COVID-19 mortality among people living with HIV and people without HIV. METHODS: In this analysis of national surveillance data, we linked and analysed data collected between March 5, 2020, and May 28, 2022, from the DATCOV South African national COVID-19 hospital surveillance system, the SARS-CoV-2 case line list, and the Electronic Vaccination Data System. All analyses included patients hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2 with known in-hospital outcomes (ie, who were discharged alive or had died) at the time of data extraction. We used descriptive statistics for admissions and mortality trends. Using post-imputation random-effect multivariable logistic regression models, we compared characteristics and the case fatality ratio of people with HIV and people without HIV. Using modified Poisson regression models, we compared factors associated with mortality among all people with COVID-19 admitted to hospital and factors associated with mortality among people with HIV. FINDINGS: Among 397 082 people with COVID-19 admitted to hospital, 301 407 (75·9%) were discharged alive, 89 565 (22·6%) died, and 6110 (1·5%) had no recorded outcome. 270 737 (68·2%) people with COVID-19 had documented HIV status (22 858 with HIV and 247 879 without). Comparing characteristics of people without HIV and people with HIV in each COVID-19 wave, people with HIV had increased odds of mortality in the D614G (adjusted odds ratio 1·19, 95% CI 1·09-1·29), beta (1·08, 1·01-1·16), delta (1·10, 1·03-1·18), omicron BA.1 and BA.2 (1·71, 1·54-1·90), and omicron BA.4 and BA.5 (1·81, 1·41-2·33) waves. Among all COVID-19 admissions, mortality was lower among people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (adjusted incident rate ratio 0·32, 95% CI 0·29-0·34) and with partial (0·93, 0·90-0·96), full (0·70, 0·67-0·73), or boosted (0·50, 0·41-0·62) COVID-19 vaccination. Compared with people without HIV who were unvaccinated, people without HIV who were vaccinated had lower risk of mortality (0·68, 0·65-0·71) but people with HIV who were vaccinated did not have any difference in mortality risk (1·08, 0·96-1·23). In-hospital mortality was higher for people with HIV with CD4 counts less than 200 cells per µL, irrespective of viral load and vaccination status. INTERPRETATION: HIV and immunosuppression might be important risk factors for mortality as COVID-19 becomes endemic. FUNDING: South African National Institute for Communicable Diseases, the South African National Government, and the United States Agency for International Development.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Humanos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología
19.
Transfusion ; 64(1): 53-67, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38054619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety of transfusion of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in high plasma volume blood components to recipients without COVID-19 is not established. We assessed whether transfusion of plasma or platelet products during periods of increasing prevalence of blood donor SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination was associated with changes in outcomes in hospitalized patients without COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who received plasma or platelet transfusions at 21 hospitals during pre-COVID-19 (3/1/2018-2/29/2020), COVID-19 pre-vaccine (3/1/2020-2/28/2021), and COVID-19 post-vaccine (3/1/2021-8/31/2022) study periods. We used multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to adjust for demographics and comorbidities to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 21,750 hospitalizations of 18,584 transfusion recipients without COVID-19, there were 697 post-transfusion thrombotic events, and oxygen requirements were increased in 1751 hospitalizations. Intensive care unit length of stay (n = 11,683) was 3 days (interquartile range 1-5), hospital mortality occurred in 3223 (14.8%), and 30-day rehospitalization in 4144 (23.7%). Comparing the pre-COVID, pre-vaccine and post-vaccine study periods, there were no trends in thromboses (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.8, 1.1]; p = .22) or oxygen requirements (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.9, 1.1]; p = .41). In parallel, there were no trends across study periods for ICU length of stay (p = .83), adjusted hospital mortality (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.9-1.0]; p = .36), or 30-day rehospitalization (p = .29). DISCUSSION: Transfusion of plasma and platelet blood components collected during the pre-vaccine and post-vaccine periods of the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with increased adverse outcomes in transfusion recipients without COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Donantes de Sangre , COVID-19 , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Oxígeno , Transfusión de Plaquetas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/efectos adversos , Plasma , Hospitalización
20.
Lancet Microbe ; 5(1): e34-e42, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Deployment of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as face masking and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic could have altered the transmission dynamics and carriage of respiratory organisms. We evaluated colonisation with Streptococcus pneumoniae and other upper respiratory tract bacterial colonisers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We did two cross-sectional surveys in Soweto, South Africa from July 3 to Dec 13, 2018 (pre-COVID-19 period) and from Aug 4, 2021, to March 31, 2022 (COVID-19 period) in healthy children (aged ≤60 months) who had recorded HIV status and had not received antibiotics in the 21 days before enrolment. At enrolment, we collected nasopharyngeal swab samples from child participants. Following nucleic acid extraction, nanofluidic quantitative PCR was used to screen all samples for 92 S pneumoniae serotypes and 14 other bacteria. The primary objective was to compare the prevalence and density of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonisation, overall and stratified by 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) serotypes and non-vaccine serotypes. Secondary study objectives included a comparison of serotype-specific pneumococcal colonisation and density, as well as colonisation by the 14 other bacteria in the COVID-19 versus pre-COVID-19 period. We used an adjusted multiple logistic and linear regression model to compare the colonisation prevalence and density between study periods. FINDINGS: We analysed nasopharyngeal swabs from 1107 children (n=571 in the pre-COVID-19 period; n=536 in the COVID-19 period). We observed no change in overall pneumococcal colonisation between periods (274 [51%] of 536 in the COVID-19 period vs 282 [49%] of 571 in the pre-COVID-19 period; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·03 [95% CI 0·95-1·12]). The prevalence of PCV13 serotypes was lower in the COVID-19 than in the pre-COVID-19 period (72 [13%] vs 106 [19%]; 0·87 [0·78-0·97]), whereas the prevalence of non-typeable S pneumoniae was higher (34 [6%] vs 63 [12%]; 1·30 [1·12-1·50]). The mean log10 density for overall pneumococcal colonisation was lower in the COVID-19 period than in the pre-COVID-19 period (3·96 [95% CI 3·85-4·07] vs 4·72 [4·63-4·80] log10 genome equivalents per mL; p<0·0001). A lower density of non-vaccine serotypes (3·63 [3·51-3·74] vs 4·08 [3·95-4·22] log10 genome equivalents per mL; p<0·0001) and non-typeable S pneumoniae (3·11 [2·94-3·29] vs 4·41 [4·06-4·75] log10 genome equivalents per mL; p<0·00001) was also observed in the COVID-19 period. There was no difference in the density of PCV13 serotypes between the periods. The prevalence of colonisation during the COVID-19 versus pre-COVID-19 period was lower for non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (280 [49%] vs 165 [31%]; aOR 0·77 [95% CI 0·71-0·84]), Moraxella catarrhalis (328 [57%] vs 242 [45%]; 0·85 [0·79-0·92]), and Neisseria lactamica (51 [9%] vs 13 [2%]; 0·64 [0·52-0·78]), but higher for Acinetobacter baumannii (34 [6%] vs 102 [19%]; 1·55 [1·35-1·77]) and Staphylococcus aureus (29 [5%] vs 52 [10%]; 1·28 [1·10-1·50]). INTERPRETATION: There were variable effects on the colonisation prevalence and density of bacterial organisms during the COVID-19 compared with the pre-COVID-19 period. The lower prevalence of PCV13 serotype together with other respiratory organisms including non-typeable H influenzae and M catarrhalis could have in part contributed to a decrease in all-cause lower respiratory tract infections observed in South Africa during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pathophysiological mechanism for the increase in A baumannii and S aureus colonisation warrants further investigation, as does the clinical relevance of these findings. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Niño , Humanos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Portador Sano/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Moraxella catarrhalis , Haemophilus influenzae , Staphylococcus aureus
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...