Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of etodolac and diclofenac sodium injection in patients with postoperative orthopedic pain.
Pareek, Anil; Chandurkar, Nitin; Gupta, Anil; Desai, Yatin; Kumar S, Hiranya; Swamy, Amit; Sirsikar, Ashish.
Affiliation
  • Pareek A; Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai, India. anilpareek@ipca.co.in
Curr Med Res Opin ; 27(11): 2107-15, 2011 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21942465
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of etodolac injection and diclofenac injection in patients with postoperative orthopedic pain. METHODS: This was multicentric, randomized, assessor-blind and parallel-group study. A group of 158 patients with moderate to severe pain following orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive either etodolac 400 mg twice a day (n = 78) or diclofenac 75 mg thrice a day (n = 80). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome measures were pain intensity difference, sum of pain intensity differences and pain relief whereas secondary efficacy variables included maximum fall in pain intensity, number of doses of study medication consumed, number of patients who required rescue medication and overall response to therapy. RESULTS: Mean pain intensity differences assessed on 10 cm VAS were significantly better for etodolac arm compared to diclofenac arm at 4, 8, 20 and 24 hours (p < 0.05). Sum of pain intensity differences over the first 8 hours (-21.31 ± 6.26 for etodolac vs. -19.13 ± 6.98 for diclofenac; p = 0.041) and over the 24 hours (-39.83 ± 10.70 for etodolac vs. -35.25 ± 12.00 for diclofenac; p = 0.012) for the etodolac group was significantly superior than diclofenac group. Assessment of pain relief showed that etodolac injection was significantly more effective than diclofenac injection (p < 0.0001) over the 24 hour assessment period. Maximum fall in pain intensity score, number of doses of study medication consumed and patients' and investigators' overall response to the drug at the end of treatment period were also significantly superior in the etodolac arm as compared to the diclofenac arm (p < 0.05). However, the number of patients who were rescued was comparable in both the treatment arms. A change in emotional functioning of the patients was not captured in this study. Both the study medications were well tolerated with no incidence of SAE throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Etodolac can be considered as an effective alternative to traditional NSAIDS in the treatment of post operative pain.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Pain, Postoperative / Diclofenac / Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors / Etodolac Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Pain, Postoperative / Diclofenac / Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors / Etodolac Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: