Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers.
Atherly, A J; Camidge, D R.
Affiliation
  • Atherly AJ; Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Br J Cancer ; 106(6): 1100-6, 2012 Mar 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22374459
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effectiveness of targeted drugs in lung cancer, using ALK and crizotinib to build the initial model.

METHODS:

Health economic modeling of cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year was based on literature review and expert opinion. The modeled population represented advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eligible for predictive biomarker screening with prescribing restricted to biomarker-positive patients.

RESULTS:

For assays costing $1400 per person, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for ALK screening all advanced NSCLC, excluding treatment cost, is $106,707. This falls to $4756 when only a highly enriched population is screened (increasing biomarker frequency from 1.6 to 35.9%). However, the same enrichment involves missing 56% patients who segregate within the unscreened group. Cheaper screening tests that miss some true positives can be more cost-effective if proportional reductions in cost exceed proportion of subjects missed. Generic modeling of idealised screening assays, including treatment cost, reveals a dominant effect of screening cost per person at low biomarker frequencies. Cost-effectiveness of <$100,000 per QALY gained is not achievable at biomarker frequencies <5% (with drug costs $1-5000 per month and screening costs $600-1400 per person).

INTERPRETATION:

Cost-effectiveness of oncology drugs whose prescribing is restricted to biomarker-positive subgroups should address the cost of detecting marker-positive patients. The cost of screening dominates at low frequencies and strategies to improve cost-effectiveness based on the assay cost, drug cost and the group screened should be considered in these scenarios.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyrazoles / Pyridines / Biomarkers, Tumor / Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Cancer Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyrazoles / Pyridines / Biomarkers, Tumor / Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Cancer Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: