Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metal measurement in aquatic environments by passive sampling methods: Lessons learning from an in situ intercomparison exercise.
Dabrin, A; Ghestem, J-P; Uher, E; Gonzalez, J-L; Allan, I J; Schintu, M; Montero, N; Balaam, J; Peinerud, E; Miège, C; Coquery, M.
Affiliation
  • Dabrin A; Irstea, UR MALY, Freshwater Systems, Ecology and Pollution Research Unit, 5 rue de la Doua, CS 70077, F-69626, Villeurbanne, France. Electronic address: aymeric.dabrin@irstea.fr.
  • Ghestem JP; BRGM, 3 Avenue C. Guillemin, BP 36009, Orléans Cedex 2, France.
  • Uher E; Irstea, UR HBAN, F-92163, Antony, France.
  • Gonzalez JL; Ifremer, Département Biogéochimie et Ecotoxicologie, B.P. 330 Zone Portuaire de Brégaillon, 83507, La Seyne/mer cedex, France.
  • Allan IJ; Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustalleen 21, O349, Oslo, Norway.
  • Schintu M; Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Montero N; AZTI-Tecnalia, Marine Research Division, Herrera kai, Portualdea z/g, Pasaia, 20110, Spain.
  • Balaam J; Cefas, Centre for the Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, United Kingdom.
  • Peinerud E; ALS Scandinavia, Box 511, SE-183 25, Taby, Sweden.
  • Miège C; Irstea, UR MALY, Freshwater Systems, Ecology and Pollution Research Unit, 5 rue de la Doua, CS 70077, F-69626, Villeurbanne, France.
  • Coquery M; Irstea, UR MALY, Freshwater Systems, Ecology and Pollution Research Unit, 5 rue de la Doua, CS 70077, F-69626, Villeurbanne, France.
Environ Pollut ; 208(Pt B): 299-308, 2016 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26589099
ABSTRACT
Passive sampling devices (PS) are widely used for pollutant monitoring in water, but estimation of measurement uncertainties by PS has seldom been undertaken. The aim of this work was to identify key parameters governing PS measurements of metals and their dispersion. We report the results of an in situ intercomparison exercise on diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) in surface waters. Interlaboratory uncertainties of time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations were satisfactory (from 28% to 112%) given the number of participating laboratories (10) and ultra-trace metal concentrations involved. Data dispersion of TWA concentrations was mainly explained by uncertainties generated during DGT handling and analytical procedure steps. We highlight that DGT handling is critical for metals such as Cd, Cr and Zn, implying that DGT assembly/dismantling should be performed in very clean conditions. Using a unique dataset, we demonstrated that DGT markedly lowered the LOQ in comparison to spot sampling and stressed the need for accurate data calculation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Environmental Monitoring / Metals Language: En Journal: Environ Pollut Journal subject: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Environmental Monitoring / Metals Language: En Journal: Environ Pollut Journal subject: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2016 Document type: Article