Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The biological response to orthopedic implants for joint replacement. II: Polyethylene, ceramics, PMMA, and the foreign body reaction.
Gibon, Emmanuel; Córdova, Luis A; Lu, Laura; Lin, Tzu-Hua; Yao, Zhenyu; Hamadouche, Moussa; Goodman, Stuart B.
Affiliation
  • Gibon E; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Córdova LA; Laboratoire de Biomécanique et Biomatériaux Ostéo-Articulaires-UMR CNRS 7052, Faculté de Médecine-Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
  • Lu L; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hopital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Lin TH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Yao Z; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Chile-Conicyt, Santiago, Chile.
  • Hamadouche M; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Goodman SB; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 105(6): 1685-1691, 2017 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27080740
ABSTRACT
Novel evidence-based prosthetic designs and biomaterials facilitate the performance of highly successful joint replacement (JR) procedures. To achieve this goal, constructs must be durable, biomechanically sound, and avoid adverse local tissue reactions. Different biomaterials such as metals and their alloys, polymers, ceramics, and composites are currently used for JR implants. This review focuses on (1) the biological response to the different biomaterials used for TJR and (2) the chronic inflammatory and foreign-body response induced by byproducts of these biomaterials. A homeostatic state of bone and surrounding soft tissue with current biomaterials for JR can be achieved with mechanically stable, infection free and intact (as opposed to the release of particulate or ionic byproducts) implants. Adverse local tissue reactions (an acute/chronic inflammatory reaction, periprosthetic osteolysis, loosening and subsequent mechanical failure) may evolve when the latter conditions are not met. This article (Part 2 of 2) summarizes the biological response to the non-metallic materials commonly used for joint replacement including polyethylene, ceramics, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), as well as the foreign body reaction to byproducts of these materials. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 105B 1685-1691, 2017.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyurethanes / Ceramics / Foreign-Body Reaction / Polymethyl Methacrylate / Bone-Implant Interface / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polyurethanes / Ceramics / Foreign-Body Reaction / Polymethyl Methacrylate / Bone-Implant Interface / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article