Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Taking the Fellowship In-Service Hematopathology Examination and Performance Relate to Success on the American Board of Pathology Hematology Examination?
Monaghan, Sara A; Felgar, Raymond E; Kelly, Melissa A; Ali, Asma M; Anastasi, John; Bellara, Aarti P; Rinder, Henry M; Sargent, Rachel L; Wagner, Jay; Swerdlow, Steven H; Johnson, Rebecca L.
Affiliation
  • Monaghan SA; From the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas sara.monaghan@utsouthwestern.edu.
  • Felgar RE; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Kelly MA; Department of Evaluation, Measurement, and Assessment, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, IL.
  • Ali AM; Department of Evaluation, Measurement, and Assessment, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, IL.
  • Anastasi J; Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Bellara AP; American Board of Pathology, Tampa, FL Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Rinder HM; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Sargent RL; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Wagner J; Department of Evaluation, Measurement, and Assessment, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, IL.
  • Swerdlow SH; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA American Board of Pathology, Tampa, FL.
  • Johnson RL; American Board of Pathology, Tampa, FL.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 146(1): 107-12, 2016 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27357289
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The biannual Fellow In-Service Hematopathology Examination (FISHE) assesses knowledge in five content areas. We examined the relationship between taking the FISHE and performance on it with outcomes on the first attempted American Board of Pathology Hematology subspecialty certifying examination (ABP-HE).

METHODS:

The pass rate between the ABP-HE candidates who took the spring FISHE and those who did not were compared. The likelihood of fellows passing the ABP-HE based on their percentiles on the FISHE was also assessed.

RESULTS:

ABP-HE candidates who took the spring FISHE had a higher pass rate (96.4%) than those who did not (76.1%, P < .001). Spring FISHE performance, including total percentile and percentiles in four of five FISHE content areas, was only a weak predictor of passing the ABP-HE.

CONCLUSIONS:

Candidates who take the spring FISHE do better on the ABP-HE than those who do not. Most fellows passed the first attempted ABP-HE regardless of FISHE performance. Whether this is due to fellows making use of the FISHE as a self-evaluation tool to help identify and then correct their knowledge deficiencies remains to be determined.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Competence / Education, Medical, Graduate / Educational Measurement / Fellowships and Scholarships Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Competence / Education, Medical, Graduate / Educational Measurement / Fellowships and Scholarships Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2016 Document type: Article