Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of the accuracy of rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis]. / Comparaison de l'échoendoscopie rectale et de l'IRM pour le diagnostic de l'atteinte colorectale par l'endométriose.
Kanté, F; Belghiti, J; Roseau, G; Thomassin-Naggara, I; Bazot, M; Daraï, E; Ballester, M.
Affiliation
  • Kanté F; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France. Electronic address: kantefanta95@yahoo.fr.
  • Belghiti J; Service de chirurgie et oncologie gynécologique et mammaire, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France. Electronic address: jeremie.belghiti@aphp.fr.
  • Roseau G; Centre chirurgical Trocadéro, département d'endoscopie digestive, Paris, France. Electronic address: gilles.roseau@free.fr.
  • Thomassin-Naggara I; Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France; GRC6-UPMC, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMR_S938, université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Paris 6, 75012 Paris, France. Electronic address: isabelle.thomassin@aphp.fr.
  • Bazot M; Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France; GRC6-UPMC, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMR_S938, université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Paris 6, 75012 Paris, France. Electronic address: marc.bazot@aphp.fr.
  • Daraï E; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; GRC6-UPMC, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMR_S938, université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Paris 6, 75012 Paris, France. Electronic address: emile.darai@aphp.fr.
  • Ballester M; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; GRC6-UPMC, centre expert en endométriose (C3E), Paris, France; UMR_S938, université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Paris 6, 75012 Paris, France. Electronic address: marcos.ballester@aphp.fr.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 45(3): 131-136, 2017 Mar.
Article in Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28256410
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis.

METHODS:

In retrospective study, 407 patients operated on service of gynecology of Tenon hospital for deep endometriosis with suspected colorectal involvement. All patients underwent MRI and then RES.

RESULTS:

In the study, 239 patients (59%) had colorectal endometriosis which were diagnosed with the histology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of RES and MRI for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis were respectively 92%, 87%, 91%, 88% and 85%, 88%, 91%, 80%. The accuracy of RES was not significantly different than MRI (90% versus 86%, P=0.09).

CONCLUSION:

RES is a good exam to diagnose colorectal endometriosis. It is able to improve diagnosis performances.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Diseases / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Ultrasonography / Colonic Diseases / Endometriosis / Endoscopy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: Fr Journal: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol Year: 2017 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Diseases / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Ultrasonography / Colonic Diseases / Endometriosis / Endoscopy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: Fr Journal: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol Year: 2017 Document type: Article