Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The practice of platelet transfusion prior to central venous catheterization in presence of coagulopathy: a national survey among clinicians.
van de Weerdt, E K; Peters, A L; Goudswaard, E J; Binnekade, J M; van Lienden, K P; Biemond, B J; Vlaar, A P J.
Affiliation
  • van de Weerdt EK; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peters AL; Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology (L.E.I.C.A.), Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Goudswaard EJ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Binnekade JM; Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology (L.E.I.C.A.), Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Lienden KP; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Biemond BJ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vlaar APJ; Department of Interventional Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vox Sang ; 112(4): 343-351, 2017 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28261815
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Correction of coagulopathy prior to central venous catheter (CVC) placement is advocated by guidelines, while retrospective studies support restrictive use of transfusion products. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We conducted a mixed vignette and questionnaire web survey to investigate current practice and preferences for CVC placement. Clinical vignettes were used to quantify the tendency to administer platelet concentrate. A positive ß-coefficient is in favour of administering platelet concentrate.

RESULTS:

Ninety-seven physicians answered the survey questions (36 critical care physicians, 14 haematologists, 20 radiologists and 27 anaesthesiologist). Eighty-six physicians subsequently completed the clinical vignettes (response rate 71%). Preferences in favour of correcting thrombocytopenia prior CVC placement were platelet counts of 10 × 109 /L and 20 × 109 /L (ß = 3·9; ß = 3·2, respectively), the subclavian insertion site (ß = 0·8). An elevated INR (INR = 3; ß = 0·6) and an elevated aPTT (aPTT = 60 s; ß = 0·4) showed a positive trend towards platelet transfusion. Platelet transfusion was less likely in an emergency setting (ß = -0·4). Reported transfusion thresholds for CVC placement varied from <10 × 109 /L to 80 × 109 /L for platelet count, from 1·0 to 10·0 for INR and from 25 s to 150 s for aPTT. Implementation of ultrasound guidance as standard practice was limited.

CONCLUSION:

Current transfusion practice prior to CVC placement is highly variable. Physicians adjust the decision to correct coagulopathy prior CVC placement based on clinical parameters, insertion site and technique applied.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Thrombocytopenia / Blood Coagulation Disorders / Catheterization, Central Venous / Platelet Transfusion Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Thrombocytopenia / Blood Coagulation Disorders / Catheterization, Central Venous / Platelet Transfusion Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: