Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of multidetector computed tomography on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis.
Schleder, S; Luerken, L; Dendl, L M; Redel, A; Selgrad, M; Renner, P; Stroszczynski, C; Schreyer, A G.
Affiliation
  • Schleder S; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. stephan.schleder@ukr.de.
  • Luerken L; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Dendl LM; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Redel A; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Selgrad M; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Renner P; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Stroszczynski C; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Schreyer AG; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Eur Radiol ; 27(11): 4544-4551, 2017 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608164
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the impact of CT scans on diagnosis or change of therapy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and obscure clinical infection.

METHODS:

CT records of patients with obscure clinical infection and SIRS or sepsis were retrospectively evaluated. Both confirmation of and changes in the diagnosis or therapy based on CT findings were analysed by means of the hospital information system and radiological information system. A sub-group analysis included differences with regard to anatomical region, medical history and referring department.

RESULTS:

Of 525 consecutive patients evaluated, 59% had been referred from internal medicine and 41% from surgery. CT examination had confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 26% and had resulted in a different diagnosis in 33% and a change of therapy in 32%. Abdominal scans yielded a significantly higher (p=0.013) change of therapy rate (42%) than thoracic scans (22%). Therapy was changed significantly more often (p=0.016) in surgical patients (38%) than in patients referred from internal medicine (28%).

CONCLUSIONS:

CT examination for detecting an unknown infection focus in patients with SIRS or sepsis is highly beneficial and should be conducted in patients with obscure clinical infection. KEY POINTS • Evaluation of patients with obscure clinical infection is a challenging task. • CT examination of patients with SIRS or sepsis seems to be beneficial. • CT examination confirmed suspected diagnosis in 26% of patients. • CT examination yielded a new infection focus in 33% of patients. • CT examination changed therapy in up to 32% of patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / Sepsis / Multidetector Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / Sepsis / Multidetector Computed Tomography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...