Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing SNP genotyping of noninvasively collected wildlife samples using microfluidic arrays.
von Thaden, Alina; Cocchiararo, Berardino; Jarausch, Anne; Jüngling, Hannah; Karamanlidis, Alexandros A; Tiesmeyer, Annika; Nowak, Carsten; Muñoz-Fuentes, Violeta.
Affiliation
  • von Thaden A; Conservation Genetics Group, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Clamecystraße 12, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany. alina.vonthaden@senckenberg.de.
  • Cocchiararo B; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Biologicum, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. alina.vonthaden@senckenberg.de.
  • Jarausch A; Conservation Genetics Group, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Clamecystraße 12, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany.
  • Jüngling H; Conservation Genetics Group, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Clamecystraße 12, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany.
  • Karamanlidis AA; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Biologicum, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Tiesmeyer A; Conservation Genetics Group, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Clamecystraße 12, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany.
  • Nowak C; ARCTUROS, Civil Society for the Protection and Management of Wildlife and the Natural Environment, Aetos, GR-53075, Florina, Greece.
  • Muñoz-Fuentes V; Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 10768, 2017 09 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28883428
ABSTRACT
Noninvasively collected samples are a common source of DNA in wildlife genetic studies. Currently, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping using microfluidic arrays is emerging as an easy-to-use and cost-effective methodology. Here we assessed the performance of microfluidic SNP arrays in genotyping noninvasive samples from grey wolves, European wildcats and brown bears, and we compared results with traditional microsatellite genotyping. We successfully SNP-genotyped 87%, 80% and 97% of the wolf, cat and bear samples, respectively. Genotype recovery was higher based on SNPs, while both marker types identified the same individuals and provided almost identical estimates of pairwise differentiation. We found that samples for which all SNP loci were scored had no disagreements across the three replicates (except one locus in a wolf sample). Thus, we argue that call rate (amplification success) can be used as a proxy for genotype quality, allowing the reduction of replication effort when call rate is high. Furthermore, we used cycle threshold values of real-time PCR to guide the choice of protocols for SNP amplification. Finally, we provide general guidelines for successful SNP genotyping of degraded DNA using microfluidic technology.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Genotyping Techniques / Animals, Wild Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Genotyping Techniques / Animals, Wild Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: