Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A phase II randomised study to evaluate the efficacy of aprepitant plus palonosetron for preventing delayed-phase CINV associated with TC therapy in gynaecological cancer.
Sugimori, Yayoi; Ota, Tsuyoshi; Ujihira, Takafumi; Ishiguro, Tomonori; Ogishima, Daiki.
Affiliation
  • Sugimori Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ota T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ujihira T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishiguro T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ogishima D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 43(9): 1454-1459, 2017 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28952201
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most frequently encountered side effects of cancer treatment. Severe CINV can lead patients to refuse chemotherapy, which ultimately affects cancer outcomes. The development of fairly new antiemetic agents, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists, palonosetron and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and aprepitant has reduced the risk and incidence of CINV. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of aprepitant plus palonosetron against palonosetron for CINV in patients receiving moderately emetic cancer chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin combination [TC] therapy).

METHODS:

Between November 2010 and March 2014, 78 patients with gynecological cancer treated with TC therapy were randomized into two groups an aprepitant group (administered aprepitant, dexamethasone and palonosetron) and a control group (administered dexamethasone and palonosetron). The primary study endpoint was complete response, defined as the complete absence of emetic events in the delayed phase.

RESULTS:

The complete response rate in the delayed phase differed significantly between the two groups, with 82% in the aprepitant group and 97% in the control group (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION:

The combination of aprepitant and palonosetron appears to be of greater efficacy than palonosetron alone for the prevention of delayed-phase CINV induced by TC therapy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quinuclidines / Vomiting / Morpholines / Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists / Genital Neoplasms, Female / Isoquinolines / Antiemetics / Nausea / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quinuclidines / Vomiting / Morpholines / Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists / Genital Neoplasms, Female / Isoquinolines / Antiemetics / Nausea / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: